Understanding Media Cultures: Social Theory and Mass Communication
Publication Year: 2002
The Second Edition of this book provides a comprehensive overview of the ways in which social theory has attempted to theorize the importance of the media in contemporary society. Understanding Media Cultures is now fully revised and takes account of the recent theoretical developments associated with New Media and Information Society, as well as the audience and the public sphere.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Marxism and Mass Communication Research: Debates within Political Economy and Ideology
- Marxism, Political Economy and Ideology
- Raymond Williams: Communications and the Long Revolution
- Cultural Materialism and Hegemony
- Raymond Williams and Material Culture: Television and the Press
- Raymond Williams and Communication Theory
- The Glasgow University Media Group and Television Bias
- Two Case Studies: Bad News and Good News
- The Eye of the Beholder and Objectivity in Media Studies
- Ideology and the Glasgow University Media Group
- Stuart Hall, Mass Communications and Hegemony
- Policing the Crisis: The Press, Moral Panics and the Rise of the New Right
- Ideology: The Return of the Repressed?
- Encoding and Decoding Media Discourse
- The Over-Inflation of Discourse and other Related Critiques
- Chapter 2: Habermas, Mass Culture and the Public Sphere
- Public Cultures
- The Bourgeois Public Sphere
- Habermas, Mass Culture and the Early Frankfurt School
- Problems with Mass Culture: Habermas and the Frankfurt School
- The Public Sphere and Public Broadcasting
- Habermas, the Public Sphere and Citizenship
- Chapter 3: Critical Perspectives within Audience Research: Problems in Interpretation, Agency, Structure and Ideology
- The Emergence of Critical Audience Studies
- David Morley and the Television Audience: Encoding/Decoding Revisited
- Semiotics, Sociology and the Television Audience
- Class, Power and Ideology in Domestic Leisure
- John Fiske and the Pleasure of Popular Culture
- Life's More Fun with the Popular Press
- Pointless Populism or Resistant Pleasures?
- Feminism and Soap Opera: Reading into Pleasure
- Feminism, Mass Culture and Watching Dallas
- Psychoanalysis, Identity and Utopia
- Reading Magazine Cultures
- Feminism and Critical Theory
- Chapter 4: Marshall McLuhan and the Cultural Medium: Space, Time and Implosion in the Global Village
- Technical Media
- Innis, McLuhan and Canadian Social Theory
- The Medium is the Message
- Space and Time: Technology and Cultural Studies
- Oral, Print and Modern Cultures: Jack Goody and Anthony Giddens
- More Critical Observations
- Chapter 5: Baudrillard's Blizzards: Postmodernity, Mass Communications and Symbolic Exchange
- Postmodernism as a Heterogeneous Field
- Baudrillard, Althusser and Debord
- Postmodernism, Symbolic Exchange and Marxism
- The French McLuhan: Simulations, Hyperreality and the Masses
- Baudrillard and Jameson
- Baudrillard's Irrationalism
- Chapter 6: New Media and the Information Society: Schiller, Castells, Virilio and Cyberfeminism
- Herb Schiller and Media Imperialism
- Informationalism, Networks and Social Movements: Manuel Castells
- The Limitations of Informational Politics
- Virilio, Speed and Communication
- Virilio and the Media of Mass Communications
- Critical Questions within Cyberfeminism
- Chapter 7: Conclusion
- The Three Paradigms of Mass Communication Research
- Possible Futures
© Nick Stevenson 2002
First published 2002
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
SAGE Publications Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
32, M-Block Market
Greater Kailash I
New Delhi 110 048
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 0 7619 73621
ISBN 0 7619 7363X (pbk)
Library of Congress catalog card number available
Typeset by Keystroke, Jacaranda Lodge, Wolverhampton.
Printed in Great Britain by The Cromwell Press Ltd, Trowbridge, Wiltshire
Preface for the Second Edition[Page ix]
The main aim of this new edition has been to revise and expand the text to take account of recent media theory and research, and the development of new media. Since the first publication of this book in 1995, there has been a great deal of fresh thinking in this respect. This has given rise to a considerable amount of debate as to whether society has now entered into an information age unlike any other. However we theorise this transition it has posed new and of course old questions within the sociology of the media. Not surprisingly those who are trying to think about the impact of new media have increasingly looked to developments in sociology and social theory to help them in this task. Hence the central aim of my book remains the same as it was in 1995. That is I attempt to demonstrate why a grounding in social theory remains key for the study of the media. This claim remains consistent whether we are talking of new or old media. Whether I successfully make this case remains for the reader to judge.
There are a number of people I should like to thank for help in the preparation of the manuscript. Firstly, and above everyone else, I would like to praise my publisher Julia Hall. Without her vision and commitment this book would not have happened. Secondly, I would like to acknowledge my debt to a number of colleagues and friends whose conversations and insights have helped along the way. They are: Micheal Kenny, Anthony Elliott, Alex MacDonald, David Moore, Paul Ransome, Joke Hermes, Ann Gray, John Downey, Maurice Roche, John B. Thompson, Sharon MacDonald, Peter Jackson, Jagdish Patel, Gaye Flounders, Chris Docx, Chris Baber, Anthony Giddens, Andrew Gamble, Dave Hesmond-haugh, David Rose, Matthew Dickson, Robert Unwin, Jim McGuigan, Claire Annesley, and Kate Brooks. Finally, I would like to thank my partner Lucy James for putting up with my tastes in television, magazines, radio, newspapers, Internet, and cinema. While we remain divided on Radio One and Wim Wenders we have found solace in Ally McBeal. In addition, Lucy has devoted a considerable amount of time to reading through the chapters that are enclosed within. This book owes a great deal to her continual support. However, this new edition is dedicated with love to our daughter Eve Anna James.Nottingham, [Page x]
people within the narrowest horizons grow stupid at the point where their interest begins, and then vent their rancour on what they do not want to understand because they could understand it only too well, so the planetary stupidity which prevents the present world from perceiving the absurdity of its own order is a further product of the unsublimated, unsuperseded interest of the rulers.(Adorno, 1974:198)[Page xii]
You either shut up or get cut up. It's only inches on the reel to reel. And the radio is in the hands of such a lot of fools trying to anaesthetise the way you feel. Radio is the sound salvation. Radio is cleaning up the nation. They say you better listen to the voice of reason. But they don't give you any choice ‘cause they think that it's treason. So you had better do as you are told. You better listen to the radio.(‘Radio, Radio’, Elvis Costello)
Please note glossary terms appear in bold in the text on first use.
- Agency The ability to be able to act within a social and cultural context while making a difference to the flow of events. Agency should not be thought of as the opposite of structure, but dependent upon rules and resources generated by social structures. To have agency is defined by the ability to be able to actively intervene.
- Audience The audience may exist in a number of senses. The first is in the imaginations of advertisers and programme makers who symbolically shape their message in order to reach a certain segment in the population. The audience in this respect is always allusive as broadcasting institutions can never be certain (despite advances in new technology) as to who is actually watching. The other way of thinking about the audience is more sociological. Here the audience is assumed to be able to make active sense of different symbolic forms (films, advertisements, etc.) often reading them against the grain. Further, sociologists have also sought to investigate the different sets of public and private relationships entered into in the consumption of the media.
- Bias News reporting that is accused as being unbalanced, inaccurate and partial.
- Civil society Usually refers to an intermediate zone between private life and the state, where relatively independent organisations are able to operate and circulate information relatively autonomously. This term is usually thought to offer a different understanding of the media to one which refers to control by the state or the market. [Page 227]
- Commodification Refers to the extent to which media messages and symbolic goods have become products to be bought and sold on the market.
- Cosmopolitanism Literally, a citizen of the world. Can also refer to a set of perspectives that have sought to jettison viewpoints that are solely determined by the nation, or their geographical standing within the world. A cosmopolitan viewpoint would need to carefully investigate whether or not it was reaffirming prejudice towards the West or Western nations.
- Critical theory An approach to the study of mass media that seeks to link media institutions and the analysis of texts in order to reveal relations of domination or emancipation. A critical theory of the media will usually seek to offer a historically informed account of modern society and the cultural industries, and suggest how they might be democratically reformulated.
- Cultural imperialism Demonstrates how the global domination of a few multinational organisations (usually from the USA) is dominating the consumption of the media in less powerful nations. The term is also linked to the idea that the world is increasingly becoming a monoculture whereby cultural diversity is being displaced by the homogeneity of consumer culture.
- Culture There are many different definitions of this term. Has been used to indicate the spread of civilised ideas and beliefs. This usage is no longer acceptable. Here is used more neutrally to describe the symbols, meanings and practices that can be associated with living within a media-dominated society.
- Cyborg The emergence of organisms either in reality or within the imagination that call into question the boundaries between humans, animals and technology.
- Discourse Particular ways of talking, writing and thinking that can be organised into identifiable patterns of usage across time and space. Whether we are analysing a news broadcast or chat show we might be able to identify a number of different codes or ways of speaking that are more prevalent than others.
- Feminism A political and social movement that aims to foster a society where men and women can live together equally while respecting their differences. Within media studies its main influence (so far) has been on developing more critical understandings of media audiences, and different textual readings of media products.
- Globalisation Describes a process whereby the world's financial markets, political systems and cultural dimensions form increasingly intense relationships. There [Page 228]are a number of different consequences that may result from such processes. Some commentatators view globalisation mainly negatively as media markets are increasingly owned and control by a handful of large media conglomerates, resulting in the privatization of public space and the commodification of the public sphere. Others are less pessimistic seeing the possible emergence of a new politics that aims for a more responsible world society based upon communication rather than domination.
- Hegemony Implies a view that domination in society depends upon winning the active consent of the people. The mass media in this view either conceals or marginalises critical voices in order to reaffirm the status quo. However, within most accounts hegemony is always in process and employs military metaphors such as ‘strategy’ or ‘war of position’, implying the possibility of challenge and change.
- Hybridity Process whereby new cultural forms and identities come into being by combining different cultural elements. This term can be linked to globalisation (the increasing movement of peoples and cultures) and/or media technological implosion whereby different technological elements combine to produce new hardware.
- Hyperreal Connecting to the increasing number of ‘real’ life stories, confessional forms and ‘real’ time cultural forms that are currently available on mainstream television. The hyperreal aims to demonstrate that what passes for ‘reality’ actually depends upon certain cultural conventions. This process tends to become exaggerated in a media culture whereby programme makers/advertisers have to compete with increasing levels of competition, and where a great deal of faith is still invested in ideas of the authentic.
- Identity Not something which is either natural or fixed but evolves within a cultural context. Usually depends upon ideas of personal selfhood and other characteristics including class, sex and gender, race and nation.
- Ideology Can be taken to mean a particular set of ideas or a belief system. Yet has also a long history in mass communication research as referring to symbolic processes that either leave unquestioned or reaffirm relations of dominance.
- Implosion The eradication of barriers that define separate social spheres. This usually occurs through the impact of media technology. For example, the idea that in the modern world politics has become entertainment and entertainment has become politics. That is, it would be hard to argue that soap operas are not a political phenomenon, as advice is offered on the raising of children, masculinity is problematicised, personal ethics and relations are discussed, and of course they [Page 229]may be watched to avoid more troubling subjects. Further, that politics in the age of spin-doctors, image manipulation and media proliferation will all attempt to construct a certain image, as do products sold in supermarkets. To say they have imploded is to say they are becoming more alike.
- Information society The argument that we have entered into a society different from that which came into being during the industrial revolution. Here information and knowledge become the key resources in determining economic success or failure. Further, such developments are also connected to the growth of the service sector and the enhanced role of culture in questions of social exclusion.
- Internet The worldwide system of computer-based interactive networks that support the growth in web pages, e-mail, interactive forms of communication and economic activity.
- Intertextuality Refers to the ability of media texts and readers to make connections to one another across different genres. This might include advertising's ability to associate itself with a well-known film, or the ability of fans to take on characteristics of their heroes.
- Liberalism A political philosophy that emphasises the capacity of individuals to make autonomous and informed decisions. In terms of mass media, it was thought that a free media enabling individuals to maximise autonomy would be best delivered by the market rather than by state control.
- Marxism A social theory which argues that the major ills of modern society can be attributed to its capitalist nature. In respect of the media, this means that large multinational companies are currently constructing the cultural horizons of most of the world's citizens in their interests. However, other Marxists have argued that the media's main significance is not in terms of ideological control, but in the commodification of everyday life. This ultimately means that most of the media-related material we consume would be done so for the profit of a few rather than the community as a whole.
- Mass culture The idea that the increased bureaucratic and capitalist control over culture is producing a world of sameness, alienating technology, efficiency and commodification.
- Mediums of communication The possibility that different mediums (radio, television, or the Internet) have a direct and differentiated impact on shaping human society. [Page 230]
- Network A set of interconnected points within a circuit, which may involve actors (human, animals, technology) or organisations.
- Objectivity The idea that you can gain accurate information about the world that is not tainted or informed by your social or cultural location.
- Ominopolis The view that new media has not so much opened up a diversity of new realities, but has lead to a reduction in the field of vision. The media, in this respect, has imposed upon us a culture of speed and immediacy that has blunted the human senses.
- Political economy A view of mass communications that emphasises it should be studied in terms of its institutional make up, in historical context, in ways which are also alive to different mixes between commercial and public forms of regulation. More broadly the term refers to the determining power of economics and politics.
- Postmodernism The ideas that features that were associated with modern society have come to an end. Currently postmodern societies are witnessing the intermixing of the popular and educated forms of culture, the end of ideology/utopias (the death of socialism), and the idea that language mirrors rather than produces reality. Some versions of postmodernism believe this spells the end of critical politics, whereas others welcome a cultural context that is more ambivalent and less certain.
- Public sphere The existence of a social space (whether real or mediated) where matters of public importance can be discussed to determine the public interest.
- Reflexivity The ability to be able to revise your actions in the light of new information. The argument is often made that information societies are becoming reflexive societies. That is as the world becomes defined through information overload rather than information scarcity, it is argued, it also becomes increasingly reflexive. This means opening up questions on nature, gender, sexuality, etc. that were repressed in previous historical eras.
- Simulation The idea that media age changes the relationship between fabrication and reality, and image and truth. The development of new technologies produce their own worlds and different reality effects that can no longer be contradicted by pointing to brute data.
- Surveillance New media technologies are increasingly being used to make visible the activities of citizens within public and private contexts. These activities are [Page 231]usually connected to powerful agencies that attempt to normalise and thereby control the behaviour of ordinary people.
- Time-space compression The idea that new technologies have made it possible to go travelling without leaving home. The arrival of real time media experiences mean that we are able to view an event irrespective of our geographical location and without any noticeable time delay. Within the economy this has introduced the possibility of ‘just in time’ forms of production, and within urban contexts the 24-hour city.
- Virtual reality The development of new human experiences (involving all the senses) through the use of computer technology.
1. For this see the excellent Denis McQuail (1992), Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction.Marxism and Mass Communication Research
1. Leavis's influence on Williams's thought was at its most marked directly after the Second World War. Williams and Leavis were both tutors during this period at Cambridge University. Williams, however, increasingly developed a respectful scepticism about Leavis's aesthetic theory while remaining connected to this tradition. While Leavis remains important, Williams's theory of cultural materialism is strongly influenced by Althusser, Gramsci and Volosinov.
2. Williams had previously discussed hegemony in ‘Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory’ (1973).
3. This point retains a crucial criticism of anti-humanism (Foucault and Althusser) popular on the Left in the late 1970s.
4. Webster argues that Jews as well as Arabs are often dehumanised by being represented as animals.
5. Hobsbawm undoubtedly overstates the reactive nature of the new nationalism. For a more positive reading see Neil Ascherson, ‘In defence of new nationalism’ (1991).
6. A similar approach is offered by David Morrison (1992).
7. Hall has remained consistently critical of Althusser's specific formulations. See Stuart Hall, ‘Thatcherism amongst the theorists: toad in the garden’ (1988b).
8. It is the lack of theoretical fit between the signifier and the signified that allows Laclau and Mouffe to argue that ideological discourse has no necessary belongingness.
9. In particular, Hall's work found a wide Left audience through the pages of Marxism Today throughout the 1980s.[Page 233]Habermas, Mass Culture and the Public Sphere
1. The work of John Fiske is discussed at length in Chapter 3.
2. This point has been brought out well in the clash between Channel 4, the state and the Royal Ulster Constabulary over the TV series, Dispatches. For an outline of this conflict see David Cox, ‘Caught in the act’ (1992).Critical Perspectives within Audience Research
1. This point was more extensively discussed in Chapter 1, pp. 48–56.
2. A similar point is made by Peter Dews in conversation with Laclau. According to Dews, Laclau's version of the subject seems to be self-determining, and constructed through language. See Ernesto Laclau, New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (1990: 209–10).
4. Here Fiske falls into precisely the same trap as Raymond Williams. As we saw in Chapter 1, he accuses Williams of assuming that a literary theorist would read the popular in the same way as the audience. Here I am suggesting that Fiske is assuming the audience would always read the popular as an enthusiastic fan might.
5. I am particularly grateful to Charlotte Brunsdon (1997) for her perceptive criticisms of the first edition of this book. I have tried to rework my ideas in respect of audience theory, feminism and the public in light of her reflections.Marshall McLuhan and the Cultural Medium
1. These intellectual connections could probably be accounted for by the fact that both Williams and McLuhan were strongly influenced by the literary critic F.R. Leavis. Meanwhile, the early Frankfurt school, as is now widely recognised, had a marked impact on a wide range of American postwar academic criticism.
2. This probably explains Baudrillard's enthusiasm for McLuhan. Both writers share a desire to analyse the technological development of the mass media, media of communication, and notions of implosion.
3. Here Giddens differs from the analysis previously offered by Habermas. Habermas argues that expert cultures are progressively being decoupled from a culturally impoverished life-world, whereas Giddens suggests that systems of expertise are routinely caught up in everyday practices. These views are not necessarily irreconcilable, and both characterise important features of modern experience. If we take an issue like AIDS, Giddens would point to the fact that most people are aware that sexual activity within modernity involves different degrees of risk. In making informed, or not so informed, choices we will make use of so-called expert advice that stems from the medical profession, the media, lesbian and gay activists, etc. A more Habermasian approach would point to the way in which community-wide discussion of AIDS has been distorted by the operation of money and power. For instance, some of the tabloid press ran sensationalistic stories that bracketed off wider forms of rational debate.
4. Lefebvre explicitly criticises post-structuralist writers such as Derrida and Barthes [Page 234]whom he views as having reduced space to the metaphoric operation of language. This creates a theoretical dualism between physical space and social space. The conversion of space into a language that needs to be read abstracts from the ways in which space is constructed through social practices. This is why Lefebvre puts so much emphasis on the production of space.Baudrillard's Blizzards
1. These works have not yet been completely translated. Here I am reliant on the selections in Baudrillard (1988a).
2. The Durkheimian implications of this argument should be obvious. Mauss is not offering a nostalgic critique of the sort Baudrillard proposes. Instead, he argues that collective forms of solidarity could be promoted by the provision of unemployment insurance and other welfare measures.
3. Baudrillard's remarks on death and dying have much in common with the recent work of Zygmunt Bauman (1992b).
4. Although as Sadie Plant (1992) points out, the situationists were seeking to provide a critique of the spectacle which would lead to transformation of real social relations. In addition, the situationists fully expected their actions to be reincorporated into the system. It is not clear that the same could be said of Baudrillard.
5. This essay was originally written in 1968.
6. Jameson argues that each respective phase of capitalist production has a corresponding regime of space. See Jameson (1988b).
7. I would like to thank Sean Homer for helping me come to a more informed appreciation of Jameson's writing. The influence of his thinking is particularly marked in the preceding section.New Media and the Information Society
1. Whether Castells should be connected to the tradition of critical theory is a complex issue. Please see Frank Webster's (1995) first rate discussion of Castells and his intellectual context.
2. I continue to be grateful to Nina Wakeford for her conversations on the subject of cyberfeminism. That she is now a leading thinking within this particular field is not a surprise to me.
References[Page 235]Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. and Turner, B. (eds) (1980) The Dominant Ideology Thesis, London, Allen and Unwin.1990) Time and Social Theory, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1974) Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life, London, Verso.(1991) The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, London, Routledge.(1973) The Dialectic of the Enlightenment, London, Allen Lane.and (1999) ‘Introduction: Three Phases of Reception Studies’, in Alasuutari, P.Rethinking the Media Audience, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216996(2001) ‘Of Mind, Body and Machine: Cyborg cultural politics in the age of hypertext’http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_culture/Gender_issues/cyberfeminism.article(1977) ‘Marxism and humanism’, in For Marx, London, Verso.(1984) ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses’, in Essays on Ideology, London, Verso.(1983) Imagined Communities, London, Verso.(1992) ‘The last empires’, New Left Review, 193: 3–13.(1964) ‘Origins of the present crisis’, New Left Review23.(1979) Considerations on Western Marxism, London, Verso.(1980) Arguments within English Marxism, London, Verso.(1983) In the Tracts of Historical Materialism. The Wallek Library Lectures, London, Verso.(1992) English Questions, London, Verso.(1985) Watching ‘Dallas’: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination, London, Methuen.(1991) Desperately Seeking the Audience, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203321454(1958) The Human Condition, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.(2000a) ‘Introduction’, in Armitage, J. (ed.) Paul Virilio; From Modernism to Hypermodernism, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218242([Page 236]2000b) ‘From modernism to hypermodernism and beyound: an interview with Paul Virilio’, in Armitage, J. (ed.) Paul Virilio; From Modernism to Hypermodernism, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218242(1991) ‘In defence of new nationalism’, New Statesman, 20 and 27 December.(1991) Women's Worlds: Ideology, Femininity and the Woman's Magazine, Basingstoke, Macmillan., , and (1994) ‘Cable firms stake superhighway claim’, Guardian 28 July: 15.(1993) Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From Media to Mediations, London, Sage.(1992) ‘Broadcasting and national identity in Ireland’, Media, Culture and Society, 14(2): 203–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344392014002005(1992) Destabilising Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, Cambridge, Polity Press.and (1973) Mythologies, trans. AnnetteLavers, St Albans, Paladin.(1975) The Mirror of Production, trans. with introduction by MarkPoster, St Louis, Telos.(1981a) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, St Louis, Telos.(1981b) ‘Requim for the media’, in For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, St Louis, Telos.(1982) ‘The Beauborg effect: implosion and deterrence’, October, 20, (Spring): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/778604(1983) ‘The ecstasy of communication’, ed. and introduced by Hal Foster, in Postmodern Culture, London, Pluto Press.(1985) ‘The masses: the implosion of the social in the media’, New Literary History, 16(3): 577–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/468841(1987a) ‘When Bataille attacked the metaphysical principle of economy’, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 11(3).(1987b) The Evil Demon of Images, The First Mari Kuttna Memorial Lecture, Power Institute Publications Number 3.(1988a) Selected Writings, ed. and introduced by MarkPoster, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1988b) America, trans. C.Turner, London, Verso.(1990a) Fatal Strategies, trans. PhilipBeitchman and W.G.J.Niesluchowski, London, Pluto Press.(1990b) ‘Mass media culture’, in Revenge of the Crystal: Selected Writings on the Modern Object and its Destiny, 1968–1983, ed. and trans. PaulFoss and JulianPefanis, London, Pluto Press.(1991) ‘The reality gulf’, Guardian, 11 January, p. 25.(1993a) Symbolic Exchange and Death, trans. Iain HamiltionGrant, with an introduction by Mike Gane, London, Sage.(1993b) Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena, trans. J.Benedict, London, Verso.(1993c) ‘Games with vestiges’, interview with Silvatore Mele and Mark Titmarsh, in M.Gane (ed.), Baudrillard Live, London, Routledge.(1998) Paraoxysm: Interviews with Phillipe Petit, London, Verso.(1992a) Intimations of Postmodernity, London, Routledge.(1992b) Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies, Cambridge, Polity Press.([Page 237]1993) Postmodern Ethics, Oxford, Blackwell.(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M.Ritter, London, Sage.(1998) Democracy Without Enemies, Polity Press, Cambridge.(1996) A Magazine of Her Own? Domesticity and Desire in the Woman's Magazine, 1800–1914. London, Routledge.(1992) Situating the Self Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York, Basic Books.(1988) The Bonds of Love, London, Virago.(1973) ‘The Work of Art in an age of mechanical reproduction’, in Illuminations, London, Fontana.(1984) The Rise and Fall of Structural Marxism, London, Macmillan.(1993) Normal Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice, London, Verso.(1991) Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom, Oxford, Blackwell.(1997) ‘“What a Story!” Understanding the Audience for Scandal’, (eds) Lull, S. and Hinerman, S.Media Scandals, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1992) Television and the Public Interest: Vulnerable Values in Western European Broadcasting, London, Sage.(1987) ‘Democracy and invisible power’, in The Future of Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1984) Distinction, London, Routledge.(1990) In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1991) Language and Symbolic Power, ed. and with an introduction by John B.Thompson, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1977) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, London, Sage.and (1977) Mass Communications in Cross-cultural Contexts: The Case of the Third World, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.(1994) ‘Building a communicative democracy: the birth and death of citizen politics in East Germany’, Media, Culture and Society, 16 (2): 183–215.(1986) ‘Ethics Revisited: Women and/in Philosophy’, in C.Pateman and E.Cross (eds), Feminist Challenges: Social and Political Theory, Hemel Hempstead, Allen and Unwin.(2001) ‘Cyberfeminism with a difference’http://www.let.ruu.nl/womens_studies/rosi/cyberfem.htm(1994). ‘In spite of women: Esquire magazine and the construction of the male consumer’. Signs: journal of women in culture and society20, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494952(1976) The Melodramatic Imagination, New Haven, Yale University Press.(1997) Screen Tastes: Soap Opera to Satellite Dishes, London, Routledge.(1986). ‘Lad overboard’. The Face70, 28–31.(1983) ‘The context, performance and meaning of ritual: the British monarchy and the “invention of tradition”, c. 1820–1977’, in E.Hobsbawm and T.Ranger (eds), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(1969) ‘Harold Adams Innis and Marshall McLuhan’, in R.Rosental (ed.), McLuhan Pro and Con, Harmondsworth, Penguin.([Page 238]1989) Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, London, Unwin Hyman.(1989) The Information City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and Urban-regional Process, Oxford, Blackwell.(1996) The Rise of the Network Society; The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 1. Oxford, Blackwell.(1997) The Power of Identity; The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 2, Oxford, Blackwell.(1998a) End of Millennium; The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 3, Oxford, Blackwell.(1998b) ‘Information Technology, Globalisation and Social Development’, UNRISD Conference On Information Technologies and Social Development, Plais des Nations, Geneva, 22–24 June 1998.(1994) Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-First Century Industrial Complexes, Routledge, London.and (1987) The Imaginary Institution of Society, trans. KathleenBlamey, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1991) Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy; Essays in Political Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.(1989). ‘The great pretender: variations on the new man theme’, in R.Chapman and J.Rutherford (eds), Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London, Lawrence & Wishart, 225–48.(Chapman, R. and Rutherford, J. (eds) (1989) Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London, Lawrence & Wishart.Chartier, R. (ed.) (1989) The Culture of Print: Power and the Uses of Print in Early Modern Europe, Princeton, Princeton University Press; Cambridge, Polity Press.1978) The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley, University of California Press.(1992) ‘Caught in the act’, New Statesman and Society, 24 July.(1986) ‘Bias that lies in the eye of the beholder’, Guardian, 19 May.(1986) Broadcasting Research Unit Report, London, Broadcasting Research Unit., , , with (1990) ‘The “new revisionism” in mass communications research’, European Journal of Communications, 5 (2–3): 135–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323190005002002(1991) ‘Mass media and democracy: a reappraisal’, in J.Curran and M.Gurevitch (eds), Mass Media and Society, London, Edward Arnold.(1985) Power without Responsibility: The Press and Broadcasting in Britain, London, Methuen.and (2001) ‘The Transformation of Democracy?’, in Axford, B. and Huggins, R. (eds) New Media and Politics, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218846(1990) Reflections on the Revolution in Europe (Chatto Counterblasts Special), London, Chatto and Windus.(1988) Magazine Journalism Today, Oxford, Focal Press.(1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, University of California Press.(1987) Society of the Spectacle.(Comments on the Society of the Spectacle, London, Verso.and (1990)Dews, P. (1986) (ed.) Habermas: Autonomy and Solidarity, London, Verso.[Page 239]2000) ‘Inequality and the Information Age: the Recent Work of Manuel Castells’, Key Words3, 45–58.(1991) A Theory of Human Need, London, Macmillan.and (1989) ‘Base and superstructure in Raymond Williams’, in T.Eagleton (ed.), Raymond Williams: Critical Perspectives, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1990) The Ideology of the Aesthetic, Oxford, Blackwell.(1991) Ideology: An Introduction, London, Verso.(1997). Men in the Mirror: Men's Fashion, Masculinity and Consumer Society. London, Cassell.(1983) The Hearts of Men: American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment, New York, Anchor Press.(1992) Social Theory and Psychoanalysis in Transition: Self and Society from Freud to Kristeva, Oxford, Blackwell.(1994) Psychoanalytic Theory: An Introduction, Oxford, Blackwell.(1987) Althusser: The Detour of Theory, London, Verso.(1983) Televising Terrorism, London, Sage., and (1976a) ‘The industrialisation of the mind’, in Raids and Reconstructions, London, Pluto Press.(1976b) ‘Constituents of a theory of the media’, in Raids and Reconstructions, London, Pluto Press.(1990) ‘The interpretive turn in media research: innovation, iteration, or illusion?’, Critical Mass Communication, 7: 147–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360170(1981) ‘Media imperialism: an assessment’, Media Culture and Society, Vol. 3(3): 281–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344378100300306(1990) ‘Electronic media and redefining time and space’, in M.Ferguson (ed.), Public Communication, the New Imperatives: Future Directions for Media Research, London, Sage.(1991) ‘Marshall McLuhan revisited: 1960s zeitgeist victim or pioneer postmodernist?’, Media, Culture and Society, 13(1): 71–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344391013001005(1968) Sense and Nonsense of McLuhan, New York, International Publishers.(1982) Introduction to Communication Studies, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203323212(1987a) ‘British cultural studies and television’, in R.Allen. (ed.), Channels of Discourse, London, Methuen.(1987b) Television Culture, London, Methuen.(1989a) Understanding Popular Culture, London, Unwin Hyman.(1989b) Reading the Popular, London, Unwin Hyman.(1992) ‘Popularity and the politics of information’, in P.Dahlgren and C.Sparks (eds), Journalism and Popular Culture, London, Sage.(1993) Power Plays, Power Works, London, Verso.(1978) Reading Television, London, Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203356623and (1990) Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West, Berkeley, University of California Press.(1989) ‘Gramsci and Marxism in Britain’, New Left Review, 176: 70–88.(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. AlanSheridan, Harmondsworth, Penguin.(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, New York, Pantheon.([Page 240]1992) ‘The uses and abuses of French discourse theories for feminist politics’, in M.Featherstone (ed.), Cultural Theory and Cultural Change, London, Sage.(1994) ‘The case of Habermas and gender’, in The Polity Reader in Social Theory, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1995) ‘False Antitheses’, in S.Benhabib, J.Butler, D.Cornell, and N.Fraser, Feminist Contentions; A Philosophical Exchange, London, Routledge.(1992). ‘Teenage girls reading Jackie’, in Scannell, P., Schlesinger, P. and Sparks, C. (eds), Culture and power, London, Sage, 182–200 (originally published in Media, Culture and Society9 (1987), 407–25).(1981) Sociological Impressionism, London, Heinemann.(1991) ‘Michel de Certeau and the practice of representation’, Cultural Studies, 5(1): 52–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502389100490041(1991a) Baudrillard: Critical and Fatal Theory, London, Routledge.(1991b) Baudrillard's Bestiary. Baudrillard and Culture, London, Routledge.(1986a) ‘Contribution to a political economy of mass communication’, in R.Collins et al. (eds), Media, Culture and Society: a Critical Reader, London, Sage.(1986b) ‘Extended review: Bourdieu's distinction’, Sociological Review, 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1986.tb02709.x(1990) ‘The media and the public sphere’, in Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information, London, Sage.(2000) ‘Information society as theory or ideology’, Information, Communication and Society3:2, pp.139–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180050123677(1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books.(1991) Women and Soap Opera: A Study of Prime Time Soaps, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1997) ‘Feminism and Media Consumption’ in J.Curran, D.Morley and V.Walkerdine (eds) Cultural Studies and Communications, London, Edward Arnold.(1983) Marx and Human Nature; Refutation of a Legend, London, Verso.(1987) ‘Post-Marxism?’, New Left Review, 163 (May–June): 40–82.(1981) The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1985) The Nation-State and Violence, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1987a) ‘Out of the Orrey: E.P. Thompson on consciousness and history’, in Social Theory and Modern Sociology, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1987b) ‘Structuralism, post-structuralism and the production of culture’, in Social Theory and Modern Sociology, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1994) Beyound Left and Right; The Future of Radical Politics, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1987) There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack, London, Hutchinson.(1999) The Mouse that Roared; Disney and the End of Innocence, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Maryland.(Glasgow University Media Group (1976a) Bad News, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Glasgow University Media Group (1976b) More Bad News, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.[Page 241]Glasgow University Media Group (1982) Really Bad News, London, Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.Glasgow University Media Group (1985) War and Peace News, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.1971) Relations in Public, London, Allen Lane.(1990) ‘Political communication and citizenship: the media and democracy in an inegalitarian social order’, in M.Ferguson (ed.), Public Communication: The New Imperatives, London, Sage(1993) ‘The mass media and the public sphere: the crisis of the information society’, Discussion paper for panel at The Public Sphere conference, University of Salford, 10 January.(2000) ‘Forthcoming features: information and communication technologies and the sociology of the future’, Sociology, Vol 34, No 1: 165–84.(1979) ‘Ideology and the mass media: the question of determination’, in M.Barrett et al., (eds), Ideology and Cultural Production, London, Croom Helm.and (1991) ‘Culture, communication, and political economy’, in J.Curran and M.Ourevitch, (eds), Mass Media and Society, London, Edward Arnold.and (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(1968) ‘The consequences of literacy’, in J.Goody (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.and (1971) Selections from Prison Notebooks, London, Lawrence and Wishart.(1992) Video Playtime: The Gendering of a Leisure Technology, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203317280(1999) ‘Audience and reception research in retrospect: The trouble with audiences’, in P.Alasuutari (ed.), Rethinking the Media Audience, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216996(1976) The Legitimation Crisis, London, Heinemann Educational.(1981a) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and Rationalisation, Boston, Beacon Press.(1981b) ‘Modernity versus postmodernity’, New German Critique, Winter.(1983a) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2: The Critique of Functionalist Reason, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1983b) ‘Walter Benjamin: consciousness-raising or rescuing critique’, in Philosophical-Political Profiles, London, Heinemann Educational.(1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. ThomasMacCarthy, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1990a) ‘What does socialism mean today? The rectifying revolution and the need for new thinking on the Left’, New Left Review, 183: 3–21.(1990b) Morality and Ethical Life: Does Hegel's Critique of Kant Apply to Discourse Ethics? Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1993) Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, trans. C.P.Cronin, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1994) ‘Citizenship and national identity’, in B.V.Steenbergen (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250600(1972a) External Influences on Broadcasting: Television's Double Bind, CCCS Occasional Paper 1.([Page 242]1972b) ‘The determinations of news photographs’, Cultural Studies, 3.(1973) Encoding and Decoding in Television Discourse, CCCS Occasional Paper, Birmingham.(1975) Television as a Medium and its Relation to Culture, CCCS Occasional Paper 34, Birmingham.(1977) ‘Culture, the media and the ideological effect’, in J.Curran (ed.), Mass Communication and Society, London, Edward Arnold.(1980) ‘Encoding and decoding’, in Culture, Media, Language, London, Hutchinson.(1982) ‘The rediscovery of “ideology”: return of the repressed in media studies’, in M.Ourevitch, Culture, Society and the Media, London, Methuen.(1983) ‘The great moving Right show’, in S.Hall and M.Jacques (eds), The Politics of Thatcherism, London, Lawrence and Wishart.(1986) ‘Postmodernism and articulation’ interview by L. Orossberg, Journal of Communications Inquiry, 10 (2): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019685998601000204(1988a) The Hard Road to Renewal, London, Verso.(1988b) ‘Thatcherism amongst the theorists: toad in the garden’, in C.Nelson and L.Orossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, London, Macmillan.(1991) ‘Old and new identities, old and new ethnicities’, in A.King (ed.), Culture, Globalization and the World System, London, Macmillan Education.(1996) ‘Introduction: Who needs identity?’, Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds), Questions of Cultural Identity, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221907(Hall, S. and Jefferson, T. (eds) (1976) Resistance through Rituals, London, Hutchinson.Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. and Roberts, B. (eds) (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order, LondonMacmillan.1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge, London.(1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_Onco-Mouse, London, Routledge.(2000) How Life a Leaf; An Interview With Thyrza Nichols Goodeve, London, Routledge.(2000) ‘World Wide Women and the Web’, Gauntlett, D. (ed.) http://Web.Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age, London, Arnold.(1993) Sharper Vision: The BBC and the Communications Revolution, London, Demos.(1992) From Class Struggle to the Politics of Pleasure: The Effects of Gramscianism on Cultural Studies, London, Routledge.(1985) Television News: Whose Bias?Berkshire, Hermitage.(1992) The Politics of Pictures: The Creation of the Public in the Age of Popular Media, London, Routledge.(1989) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford, Blackwell.(1989) ‘After the masses’, Marxism Today, January.(1989) ‘Legitmation problems and crisis tendencies’, in Political Theory and the Modern State, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1996). Reading Women's Magazines. Cambridge, Polity Press.(1997) ‘Gender and media studies: No woman, no cry’, Corner, J. and Schlesinger, P. (eds) International Media Research, London, Sage.([Page 243]1990) Nations and Nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(1986) Children and Television, Cambridge, Polity Press.and (1950) Empire and Communications, Oxford, Oxford University Press.(1951) The Bias of Communication, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.(2001) Making Sense of Men's Magazines, Cambridge, Polity Press., and (1977) Aesthetics and Politics, London, Verso.(1991) Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, London, Verso.(1988a) ‘Postmodernism and consumer society’, in E.A.Kaplan (ed.), Postmodernism and its Discontents: Theories, Practices, London, Verso.(1988b) ‘Cognitive mapping’, in C.Nelson and L.Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, London, Macmillan(1990) Redeeming Modernity: Contradictions in Media Criticism, London, Sage.(1984) ‘Authoritarian populism, two nations and Thatcherism’, New Left Review, 147 (September–October): 32–60., , and (1985) ‘Mutual aid in the decoding of Dallas: preliminary notes from a cross-cultural study’, in P.Drummond and R.Paterson (eds), Television in Transition: Papers from the First International Television Studies Conference, London, British Film Institute.and (1988) Democracy and Civil Society, London, Verso.(1991) The Media and Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1996) Reflections on Violence, London, Verso.(1981) ‘Network television and American society: introduction to a critical theory of television’, Theory and Society, 10(1): 31–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00209562(1989) Jean Baudrillard. From Marxism to Post-Modernism and Beyond, Cambridge, Polity Press.(2000) ‘Virilio, war and technology: Some critical reflections’, in Armitage, J. (ed.) Paul Virilio; From Modernism to Hypermodernism, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218242(Key Note Market Report (1996) Men's Magazines.King, A. (ed.) (1991) Culture, Globalisation and the World System, Basingstoke, Hampshire, Macmillan.1993) Out of the Garden: Toys and Children's Culture in the Age of TV Marketing, London, Verso.(1977) Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory, London, Verso.(1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, London, Verso.(1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London, Verso.and (1991) ‘Raymond Williams and the cultural analysis of television’, Media Culture & Society, 13 (2): 153–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344391013002003(1994) Economies of Signs and Space, London, Sage., and (1990) The Politics of Free Speech, London, Faber and Faber.(1991) The Production of Space, trans. , Oxford, Blackwell.(1992) Critique of Everyday Life, Vol. 1, London, Verso.(1991) ‘In defence of objectivity’, in J.Curran and M.Gurevitch (eds), Mass Media and Society, London, Edward Arnold.([Page 244]1991) ‘Citizenship engendered’, Critical Social Policy, 32 (Autumn).(1990) ‘Feminism and postmodernism’, in R.Boyne and A.Rattansi (eds) Postmodernism and Society, London, MacMillan.(1991) China Turned On; Television, Reform and Resistance, London, Routledge.(1993) ‘Globo Village: Television in Brazil’, in T.Dowmunt (ed.), Channels of Resistance: Global Television and Local Empowerment, London, BFI Publishing(1970) ‘The social cohesion of liberal democracy’, American Sociological Review, June.(1988) States, War and Capitalism, Oxford, Blackwell.(1977) The Aesthetic Dimension: Towards a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics, London, Macmillan.(1994) ‘Reinventing federalism’, New Left Review, 203:17–26.(1992) Citizenship and Social Class, London, Pluto Press.(1992) Rethinking Media Theory: Signposts and New Directions, trans. J.A.Cohen and M.Urquidi, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press.and (1984) International Image Markets, London, Comedia., and (1990) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, London, Routledge.(1951) The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy; the Making of Typographic Man, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1969) Counterblast, New York, Harcourt, Brace and World.(1994) Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man, London, Routledge.(1967) The Medium is the Message, Harmondsworth, Penguin.and (1968) War and Peace in the Global Village, New York, Bantam Books.and (1989) The Global Village, Oxford, Oxford University Press.and (1994) News and Journalism in the UK: A Textbook, London, Routledge.(1992) Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction,(2nd edition, London, Sage.1992) Cultural Populism, London, Routledge.(1978). ‘Jackie: an ideology of adolescent femininity’; reprinted as ‘Jackie magazine: romantic individualism and the teenage girl’, in McRobbie, A.1991. Feminism and Youth Culture. London, Macmillan, 81–134.(1991). Jackie and Just Seventeen: girls’ comics and magazines in the 1980s, in McRobbie, A.Feminism and Youth Culture. London, Macmillan, 135–88.(1994) Postmodernism and Popular Culture, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203168332(1989) Nomads of the Present, London, Hutchinson Radius.(1996) Challenging Codes; Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891(1991) ‘Walter Benjamin's theory of myth’, in O.Smith, (ed.), On Walter Benjamin, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.(1985) No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, New York, Oxford University Press.([Page 245]1971) McLuhan, London, Fontana/Collins.(Mintel Market Intelligence (1997) Men's Lifestyle Magazines (see http://www.mintel.com for details).1988) Loving with a Vengeance: Mass Produced Fantasies for Women, London, Routledge.(1989) ‘Getting a bit of the other – the pimps of postmodernism’, in R.Chapman and J.Rutherford eds. Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London, Lawrence & Wishart, 165–92.(1980) The ‘Nationwide’ Audience, London, British Film Institute.(1981) ‘The Nationwide audience: a critical postscript’, Screen Education, 39.(1988) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure, London, Routledge.(1992) Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies, London, Routledge.(1992) Television and the Gulf War (Acamedia Research monograph 7), London, John Libbey.(1996). Cultures of Consumption: Masculinities and Social Space in Late Twentieth-century Britain. London, Routledge.(1996) The Political Economy of Communication, London, Sage.(1997) Connexity, London, Chatto and Windus.(1978) ‘Blindspots in Western Marxism – a reply to Dallas Smythe’, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 2(2).(1992) ‘Citizens, consumers, and public culture’, in M.Skovmand and M. ChristianSchroder (eds), Media Cultures, London, Routledge.(1969) ‘McLuhanism: the myth of our time’, in R.Rosenthal, McLuhan Pro and Con, Harmondsworth, Penguin.(1964) ‘The British political elite’, New Left Review, 23.(1988) The Enchanted Glass: Britain and its Monarchy, London, Radius.(1994) Politics of the Mass Media, London, Routledge.(1993) Looking for the holy grail: publishing and advertising strategies for contemporary men's magazines. Cultural Studies7, 467–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502389300490311(1996) Hard Looks: Masculinities, Spectatorship and Contemporary Consumption, London, UCL Press.(1997). ‘Exhibiting masculinity’, in S.Hall (ed.) Representtion: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London, Sage, 291–336.(1990) What's Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1977) Interfaces of the Word, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.(1991) ‘British citizenship and cultural difference’, in G.Andrews (ed.), Citizenship, London, Lawrence and Wishart.(1982) ‘Critique of the public/private dichotomy’, in A.Phillips (ed.), Feminism and Equality, Oxford, Blackwell.(1989) The Disorder of Women, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1991) Engendering Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1992) ‘Homeward bound: leisure, popular culture and consumer capitalism’, in D.Strinati and S.Wagg (eds), Come on Down? Popular Media Culture, London, Routledge.and (1987) ‘Whose news?’, Media, Culture & Society, 9(4): 397–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344387009004002(1990) Seeing and Believing: The Influence of Television, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203326251([Page 246]1995) ‘Shifting imaginaries: decolonization, internal decolonization, postcoloniality’, in J.N.Pieterse and B.Parekh (eds) The Decolonization of the Imagination; Culture, Knowledge and Power, London, Zed Books.and (1992) The Most Radical Gesture: The Situationist International in a Postmodern Age, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203210260(1996) ‘On the Matrix: cyberfeminist simulations’, in Sheilds, R. (ed.) Cultures of the Internet, London, Sage.(1997) Zeros + Ones: Digital Women + The New Technoculture, Fourth Estate, London.(1990) The Mode of Information, Chicago, Chicago University Press.(1994) ‘The mode of information and postmodernity’, in D.Crowley and D.Mitchell (eds), Communication Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1995) The Second Media Age, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1996) ‘Cyberdemocracy; Internet and the public sphere’, in Porter, D. (ed.) Internet Culture, London, Routledge.(1997) ‘Postmodern Virtualities’ in Featherstone, M. and Burrows, R. (eds)Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk; Cultures of Technological Embodiment, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250198(1982) The Disappearence of Childhood, New York, Dell.(1985) Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, London, Methuen.(1993) Technopoly; The Surrender of Culture to Technology, New York, Alfred A. Knot.(1994) ‘The present tense’, interview with Melvyn Bragg, New Left Review, 205:131–40.(1975) Political Power and Social Classes, London, Verso.(1978) State, Power Socialism, London, Verso.(1987) Life's More Fun with your Number One ‘Sun’ – Interviews with some ‘Sun’ Readers, CCCS Occasional Paper, No 85, Birmingham.(1986) ‘Identifying ideological seams: mass culture, analytical method, and political practice’, Communication, 9 : 93–123.(1987) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature, London, Verso.(1992) Antonio Gramsci: a New Introduction, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1993) Communications and the ‘Third World’, London, Routledge.(1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, trans. and ed. J.B.Thompson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(1992) Globalisation: Social Theory and Global Culture, London, Sage.(1997) ‘Cyberspace and the world we live in’, in Featherstone, M. and Burrows, R.Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk; Cultures of Technological Embodiment, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250198(1999) Times of the Technoculture; From the information society to the vitual life, London, Routledge.and (1994) ‘The new smartness’ in Bender, G. and Druckrey, T.Culture on the Brink; Ideologies of Technology, Seattle, Bay Press.(1986) The Cult of Information, Cambridge, Lutterworth Press.(1992) ‘Democracy and social rights’, New Left Review, 191.([Page 247]1978) Orientalism, London, Routledge.(1993) Culture and Imperialism, London, Chatto and Windus.(1974) Course in General Linguistics, London, Fontana.(1986) Sexual Contradictions: Psychology, Psychoanalysis, and Feminism, London, Tavistock.(1986) ‘Broadcasting and the politics of unemployment 1930–1935’, in R.Collins et al. (eds), Media, Culture and Society: a Critical Reader, London, Sage.(1990) ‘Public service broadcasting: the history of a concept’, in A.Goodwin and G.Whannel (eds), Understanding Television, London, Routledge.(1992) ‘Public service broadcasting and modern public life’, in PScannell et al. (eds), Culture and Power: a Media, Culture and Society Reader, London, Sage.(1970) Mass Communication and American Empire, New York, M.E. Sharpe.(1986) ‘Electronic information flows: new basis for global domination?’, in P.Drummond and R.Paterson (eds), Television in Transition, London, British Film Institute.(1991) ‘Not yet the post-imperialist era’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, Vol 8: 13–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366777(1996) Information Inequality; The Deepening Crisis of America, London, Routledge.(1978) Putting ‘Reality’ Together, London, Constable.(1990) ‘Rethinking the sociology of journalism: sources, strategies and the limits of media-centrism’, in M.Ferguson (ed.), Public Communication: The New Imperatives, London, Sage.(1991) Media, State and Nation – Political Violence and Collective Identities, London, Sage.(1992) Women Viewing Violence, London, British Film Institute., , and (1993) Advertising, the Uneasy Persuasion: Its Dubious Impact on American Society, London, Routledge.(1999) Why Feminism?, Cambridge, Polity Press.(Seidler, V.J. (1991) (ed.) The Achilles Heel Reader; Men, Sexual Politics and Socialism, London, Routledge.1992) Dynamics of Media Politics: Broadcast and Electronic Media in Western Europe, London, Sage.and (1992) Modern Conditions, Postmodern Controversies, London, Routledge.(1993) ‘Europe/America: Baudrillard's fatal comparison’, in C.Rojek and B.S.Turner (eds), Forget Baudrillard?, London, Routledge.(1990) ‘Towards a global culture?’, in M.Featherstone (ed.), Nationalism, Globalisation and Modernity, London, Sage.(1977) ‘Communications – blindspots of Western Marxism’, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1(3): 1–27.(1989) Postmodern Geographies: The Assertion of Space in Critical Social Theory, London, Verso.(1990) Sex Crime in the News, London, Routledge.and (1979) ‘Marxism, materialism and biology’, in J.Mepham (ed.), Issues in Marxist Philosophy: Materiallsm, Brighton, Harvester.(1990) Troubled Pleasures, London, Verso.(1987) ‘Striking results’, Media, Culture & Society, 9.([Page 248]1992a), ‘Popular journalism: theories and practice’, in P.Dahlgren and C.Sparks (eds), Journalism and Popular Culture, London, Sage.(1992b) ‘The popular press and political democracy’, in P.Scannell et al. (eds), Culture and Power: a Media, Culture and Society Reader, London, Sage.(1996) ‘Fabulous feminist futures and lure of cybercultures’, in J.Dovey (ed.) Fractural Dreams; New Media in a Social Context, London, Lawerence and Wishart.(1996) Gargantura; Manufactured Mass Culture, London, Verso.(1995) Culture, Ideology and Socialism: Raymond Williams and E.P Thompson, Aldershot, Avebury Press.(1999) The Transformation of the Media; globalisation, morality and ethics, Harlow, Longman.(2001) Mass Media, Politics and Democracy, Houndmills, Palgrave.(1989) Sources of Self: The Making of Modern Identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(1991) ‘Language and Society’, in A.Honneth and H.Jonas (eds), Communicative Action, Cambridge Polity Press.(1999) ‘The moral consequentiality of television’European Journal of Social Theory2(4):469–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13684319922224617(1978) ‘The peculiarities of the English’, in The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin; New York, Monthly Review Press.(1984) Studies in the Theory of Ideology, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1990) Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1994) ‘Social theory and the media’, in D.Crowley and D.Mitchell (eds), Communication Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1995) The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media, Cambridge, Polity Press(1997) ‘Scandal and social theory’, in Lull, S. and Hinerman, S. (eds) Media Scandals, Cambridge, Polity Press.(1991) Cultural Imperialism, London, Pinter.(1978) Hearth and Home: Images of Women and the Media, New York, Oxford University Press.(1993a) ‘Contemporary problems in the theory of citizenship’, in Citizenship and Social Theory, London, Sage.(1993b) ‘Cruising America’, in C.Rojek and B.S.Turner, Forget Baudrillard?, London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203412886(1994) ‘Postmodern culture/modern citizens’, in B.V.Steenbergen (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250600(1991) British Cultural Studies: An Introduction, Boston, Unwin Hyman.(2000) Sociology Beyond Societies; mobilities for the twenty-first century, London, Routledge.(1991) Racism and the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration, London, Routledge.(1999) The Network Society, London, Sage.(1998) ‘The ethics of making private life public’, Brants, K., Hermes, J. and van Zoonen, L. (eds) The Media in Question, London, Sage.(1989) War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception, London, Verso.([Page 249]1994) The Vision Machine, trans. JulieRose, Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University.(1995) The Art of the Motor, trans. JulieRose, Minneapolis, London, University of Minnesota Press.(1997) Open Sky, London, Verso.(1998) ‘Military space’, in Der Derran, J. (ed.) The Virilio Reader, Oxford, Blackwell.(1999) Politics of the Very Worst – An Interview by Philippe Petit trans. MichealCaraliere, Semiotext(e), Columbia University, New York.(2000a) The Information Bomb, London, Verso.(2000b) Polar Inertia, London, Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218099(2000c) Strategy of Deception, London, Verso.(1986) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. L.Matejka and I.R.Titunik, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.(2001) ‘Networking women and girls with information/communication technology: surfing tales of World Wide Web’, in Bell, D. and Kennedy, B.A. (eds) The Cybercultures Reader, London, Routledge.(1990) A Brief History of Blasphemy, Southwold, Orwell Press.(1995) Theories of the Information Society, London, Routledge.(1970) Women's Magazines, 1693–1968, London, Michael Joseph.(1988) The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.(2001) ‘Where is Feminism in Cyberfeminism?’http://www-art.cfa.cmu.edu/www-wilding/wherefem.html(1952) Drama from Ibsen to Eliot, London, Chatto and Windus.(1961) Culture and Society (1780–1950), Harmondsworth, Penguin.(1962) Communications, Harmondsworth, Penguin.(1965) The Long Revolution, Harmondsworth, Penguin.(1973) ‘Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory’, New Left Review, 82.(1974) Television: Technology and Cultural Form, London, Fontana/Collins. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203426647(1978) ‘Problems of materialism’, New Left Review, 109: 3–17.(1979a) Politics and Letters: Interviews with ‘New Left Review’, London, Verso.(1979b) Marxism and Literature, Oxford, Oxford University Press.(1980) Problems in Materialism and Culture, London, Verso.(1982) Culture, London, Fontana.(1985) Towards 2000, London, Penguin.(1987) ‘The press we don't deserve’, in J.Curran, The British Press: A Manifesto, London, Macmillan.(1988) ‘Culture is ordinary’ (1958), in Resources of Hope, London, Verso.(1989a) ‘A defence of realism’, in What I Came to Say, London, Hutchinson.(1989b) ‘Isn't the news terrible?’, in What I Came to Say, London, Hutchinson.(1989c) The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists, London, Verso.(1954) Preface to Film, London, Film Drama.and (1990) Common Culture, Buckingham, Open University Press.(1987) Inside Women's Magazines. London, Pandora Press.(