Transforming Nursery Education
Publication Year: 2003
`This is an important publication, which I urge colleagues to read and to consider carefully all the implications'- Early Years `... this provocative analysis with its clear examples is worth reading for its fresh look at where we could be headed come the 21st century'- Nursery Equipment Early childhood services in the UK have been badly neglected. The consequences are serious: chronic underfunding and increasing fragmentation; most staff poorly paid and trained; access often a matter of potluck and money; low aspirations and even lower expectations. Increasingly, young children are seen as important for what they may become rather than for what they are, and the
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Title: Transforming Nursery Education
Replacement title-verso page
© Peter Moss and Helen Penn, 1996
First published 1996
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
Paul Chapman Publishing
A SAGE Publications Company
1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B—42 Panchsheel Enclave
PO Box 4109
New Delhi 110 017
British library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Printed digitally and bound in Great Britain by
Lightning Source UK Ltd., Milton Keynes, Bedfordshire
Preface[Page vii]Why We Have Written This Book?
Early childhood services in Britain have a lot going for them. A long and rich tradition of innovative work, by individuals and organisations. A resourceful and committed workforce. Membership of a European Union which provides many opportunities for cross-national exchange and collaboration.
Yet despite these considerable advantages, early childhood services are in a critical state and at a critical stage. The services are fragmented, inflexible, incoherent and full of inequalities, unable to meet the changing and varied needs of families. They rely on a workforce most of whom are poorly paid and poorly trained. Like many other parts of the national infrastructure, early childhood services suffer the consequences of chronic under-resourcing.
In a centralised state such as Britain has increasingly become, much of the responsibility for the critical situation we are now in must be assigned to the action, or inaction, of successive governments. There has been a history of missed opportunities to develop a national policy on early childhood services. [Page viii]Instead, obstacles have actually been placed in the way of the future development of such a policy, as a result of policy measures introduced elsewhere without consideration given to their consequences for early childhood services – for example, education legislation over the last 15 years which has virtually ignored early childhood services while having major implications for them. Developments have been allowed to go forward unhindered without considering their longer-term implications or the relative merits of different development options – for example, the growth of a large unsubsidised private market in ‘day care’ services or the expansion of part-time nursery classes. Growing numbers of public and private agencies (e.g. TECs, the Home Office, employers) have identified an ‘interest in early childhood services, but this proliferation has increased fragmentation and lack of coherence as different agencies focus narrowly on one particular service role or one particular group of service users. Questionable concepts and structures have gone unquestioned – for example, starting compulsory and primary schooling at 5 (or, for most children in Northern Ireland, 4) and the validity of dividing early childhood services into two separate systems labelled ‘day care’ and ‘education’. Legislation has been introduced requiring local authorities to review their early childhood services – but no parallel duty has been placed on central government to do the same nationally.
Instead of the development of a national policy on early childhood services based on continuous debate and regular review, there has been a history of occasional, narrowly focused government initiatives: for example, the 1972 Education White Paper, the Government's conference on ‘Low-Cost Day Provision for the Under Fives’ in 1976, the ‘day care’ parts of the Children Act 1989, the childcare disregard introduced in the 1993 budget. Most recently, there has been the decision to provide vouchers for pre-school education for all 4 year olds.
There are some positive features to emerge from this latest proposal, in particular the recognition that education can and should take place across the whole range of services for 4 year olds, not just in nursery schools and classes. But these cannot disguise the fact that, once again, an opportunity for a more fundamental rethink of early childhood services has been missed. The voucher scheme does not come out of a wider review and analysis of current early childhood services and future options. There has been no questioning of ends, no discussion of the various values that might underpin services, no review of means, no assessment of different options for service development. Consequently, the voucher scheme is irrelevant to the main issues confronting early childhood services.
Because none of the succession of government initiatives has been grounded in any longer-term and developmental process of political and public debate about early childhood services, each has failed to identify, define and address the critical questions. What are the functions of early childhood services? What age range should these services cover? On what values and principles should services be based? In the light of these questions, what are the most [Page ix]appropriate types of service provision? Should there be an integrated or split system of services? Should there be coherence across services in certain areas? What training is needed for staff? What are the costs and what are the benefits of early childhood services? Who should contribute to these costs and on what basis should costs be allocated between responsible parties? How should early childhood services relate to education and other services for older children?
Without answering these questions, it is impossible to judge, for example, whether vouchers as a method of funding are in the best interests of children, families and early childhood services. Without answers to these questions, there is little chance of creating a national policy and a national framework for implementing that policy which will enable Britain to move beyond individual examples of good practice to an integrated and coherent system of early childhood services that will meet the needs of all our children and parents. Without answering these questions, there can be no vision, a critical ingredient of policy and practice.
We have observed this sad state of national affairs over the last 25 years, while at the same time being involved in initiatives and developments in this country and abroad which have shown what could be done, given sustained political commitment and understanding. We have been driven to write this book by a combination of frustration, concern and hope. Frustration, because of a failure of vision and action, brought home vividly by the quotation at the beginning of this preface – written 20 years ago but still applicable today. Concern, because we fear that the situation in Britain may soon reach a point of no return. Hope, because we know what is possible, from what we have seen in this country and abroad; and because we are aware that many of our ideas are also shared by others (for example, Pugh, 1994).
This book is a contribution to the development of debate about ends, means and values in early childhood services. We offer a vision of a comprehensive, integrated and coherent early childhood service for children from 0 to 6, which would be the first stage of the education system but equally committed to meeting other needs of children and parents including care, socialisation and support. We also offer specific proposals for making this vision a reality, in the course of which we have tried to grasp firmly some of the most painful nettles. We suggest that the debate about ends and means must be accompanied by a debate about values, not just what values we wish to adopt or reject but the priority we attach to different values.Why Have We Called the Book Transforming Nursery Education?
Nursery education is one of the main services we have for young children and it has many good and enduring features; it is the most widespread, well-known and respected publicly funded early years service. But we think that nursery education as it is presently understood and delivered is inadequate. It is a limited service, part-time, short-term and for a narrow age range of children, [Page x]predicated on a view of mothers at home and available to look after their children; and whose main task is to prepare and funnel children into primary school. To state this is not to denigrate what currently exists, but to begin the process of examining how nursery education might develop.
We suggest that given the fundamental changes in social context and the direction of recent theoretical perspectives, which we explore in later chapters, it would be sensible to rethink nursery education – in terms of who it is for, how long it is available, and the prominence of curricular initiatives and children's learning as its central goal.
But the need for development and transformation goes beyond nursery education. It is not only nursery education which is inappropriate. We think most forms of services have major shortcomings. It is one of our central contentions that the legacy of years of neglect is a large amount of service provision that is ill-suited to provide the type of comprehensive, multifunctional and responsive early childhood service we envision. Yet when public, political and media attention pays one of its fleeting visits to early childhood services, the discussion assumes more of the same. As well as nursery education there are hundreds of private nurseries geared to the need of employed parents for care, but which often ignore children's need for education or the need to provide a community resource. Children with high levels of social need are segregated into yet another system of services – ‘day care’ organised by social services departments – and are also often excluded from education. Other places are provided by playgroups which offer a meagrely resourced part-time service dependent on cheap female labour; or by childminders who are also poorly resourced and often ill-trained and ill-paid.
But things do not have to be like this. The services we have in Britain today are not inevitable. They are not the consequence of regular and reflective review. There is no intrinsic reason why ‘nursery education’ should be equated with classes tacked on to primary schools in which, if lucky, children will spend a few hours a week during less than a year of early childhood. The best features of today's ‘nursery education’ – and some of the practice is undoubtedly good – could be applied in a new context. A transformed nursery education could be at the centre of a new comprehensive, integrated and coherent early years service.
There is a role for privately managed services, parent and community-run services and school-based services in the system of early childhood services that we propose. But the system requires transformation of what we have, not more of the same; it requires clear direction to be given to service development, not leaving development to the free play of market forces. It requires recognition that services are social and cultural institutions, not mere purveyors of services to private consumers. It requires a new, broader view of ‘nursery education’, which might become the generic name for the 0 to 6 early childhood service we propose, an umbrella title spanning a range of community-based services, all capable of meeting a variety of needs including care, socialisation, support and learning.[Page xi]The Plan of the Book
Transforming Nursery Education begins and ends with our vision of a comprehensive, integrated and coherent early childhood service. We start with a chapter setting out this vision, exploring the principles that would be necessary to provide a service system capable of delivering high quality, flexible and multi-functional services to children from 0 to 6 years and their parents. We end it with a chapter on how this vision might be fulfilled, letting our imagination run riot and offering three examples of services in the year 2000 – fictitious examples, but based on projects that we have come across or which have been sent to us.
In between we offer a critique of what is already available, from a number of different perspectives. We look at evidence of what parents want which, we argue, is well in tune with our vision. We show what the current plethora of services means in terms of what is actually on offer to children and parents in one local community. We look at the staff who work in the current services, and at the poor deal most get in terms of training, pay and conditions. We look at the history of nursery education, a perspective which helps explain how we have got to be where we are today, as well as at contemporary practices in nursery education. We emphasise that from both these perspectives, historical and contemporary, there is more than one way to conceptualise and deliver nursery education.
We explore initiatives in Britain, and services in two European countries, where our vision of a comprehensive, integrated and coherent early childhood service has already partly or wholly been translated into practice. We consider the costs, benefits and funding of such a comprehensive, integrated and coherent early childhood service and make some specific policy suggestions about the steps which should be taken at national level in the UK to achieve this service. It is here in particular that we have had to grasp nettles by putting forward our conclusions about some long-running and contentious issues such as staffing and financing.
We have tried to make the book lively and down to earth, using examples to illustrate our points. Where positive examples are given, and we have had permission, we have used real and identifiable cases. Where the examples are more negative, we have been careful to disguise them. Some of the examples are real cases. In other instances we have composited cases drawing from several examples known to us. We hope that in doing so we have been able to mirror the ‘real world’ in representing the dilemmas that parents, workers, politicians and other stakeholders commonly face in addressing and trying to resolve the complex issues of early childhood services.
We would like to thank Mary Hart, Maureen Leck, Margaret Orchard and Robin Duckett for their help with preparing Chapters 8 and 12. We are also very grateful to a number of colleagues for their comments on earlier drafts, including Angela Hobsbaum, Sally Holtermann, Gill Haynes, Susan McQuail, Sue Owen, Richard Stainton and Margy Whalley. They did not agree with all of our views and conclusions, and as authors we take complete responsibility for the contents of the book, including any mistakes it contains. Finally, our thanks are due to Loveday Penn and Clemency Penn for their help in preparing the text.
References[Page 167]1995) Instigating change in the early years: financial management implications, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 9, no. 3, 10–12.(Audit Commission (1995) Local Authority Performance Indicators: Appendix to Volumes 1 and 2, HMSO, London.Audit Commission (1995) Where Did You Learn That: Education of Children Under Five, Audit Commission, London.1994) The paradox of services for children 0–3 years, in EC Childcare Network Annual Report 1992, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.(1994) Start Right: the Importance of Early Learning, Royal Society of Arts, London.(Belle, D. (ed.) (1989) Children's Social Networks and Social Supports, Wiley, New York.Blenkin, G. M., and Kelly, A. V. (eds.) (1987) Early Childhood Education: A Developmental Curriculum, Paul Chapman, London.1994) The National Curriculum and Early Learning, Paul Chapman, London., and (1995) Principles into Practice: Improving the Quality of Children's Early Learning - Phase One Report, mimeographed report from Early Childhood Education Research Project, Goldsmiths' College., , and (1993) The Transition from Infancy to Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(Bornstein, M. (ed.) (1991) Cultural Approaches to Parenting, Lawrence Erlbaum: London.1952) Maternal Care and Mental Health, World Health Organisation, Geneva.(1976) Margaret McMillan, Denholm House Press - National Christian Education Council, Surrey.(1994) Employment and Family Life: A Review of Research in the UK, Employment Department, London., , and (1983) Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass.(1983) An evolution of environmental models in developmental research, in W.Kessen (ed.) History, Theory and Methods; Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York.and ([Page 168]1980) Under Fives in Britain, Grant McIntyre, London.(1994) Archigrad 1: The Frankfurt Kindergarten Programme, Corporate Identities Production, Frankfurt.(Central Advisory Council on Education (1967) Children and Their Primary Schools (the Plowden Report), HMSO, London.Central Statistical Office (1995a) Social Trends 25 (1995 Edition), HMSO, London.Central Statistical Office (1995b) Economic Trends, HMSO, London.1988): Children under Five: Educational Research and Evidence. Final Report to the Department of Education and Science, Gordon and Breach, London.(Cochran, M. (ed.) (1993) International Handbook of Childcare Policies and Programmes, Greenwood Press, Connecticut.1991) Childcare in a Modern Welfare State, Institute of Public Policy Research, London.and (Commission on Social Justice (1994) Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal, Vintage, London.Consultative Committee on the Primary School (1931) Report of the Committee, HMSO, London.1985) Friendship and Peer Culture in the Early Years, Ablex Publishing Co., Norwood NJ.(1994) Evaluation and regulation: a question of empowerment, in P.Moss, and A.Pence (eds.) Valuing Quality in Early Childhood Services, Paul Chapman, London.and (1993) The social pedagogues in Western Europe - some implications for European inter-professional care, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 8, no. 1.(1994) Social Workers or Social Educators? The International Context for Developing Social Care. National Institute of Social Work Paper No.2, National Institute of Social Work, London.(1995) Interview in Guardian Education, 16 May.(1978) Education Under Six, Croom Helm, London.(Department for Education (1995) Pupils under Five Years of Age in Schools in England - January 1995 (Statistical Bulletin 2/95), Department for Education, London.Department of Education and Science (1973) Circular 2/73, HMSO, London.Department of Education and Science (1989) Aspects of Primary Education: The Education of Children Under Five, HMSO, London.Department of Education and Science (1990) Starting with Quality: The Rumbold Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Quality of the Educational Experience offered to 3- and 4-year-olds, HMSO, London.Department of Health (1995) Children's Day Care Facilities at 31 March 1994 England, Department of Health, London.Department of Health and Social Security/Department of Education and Science (1976) Low Cost Day Provision for the Under-Fives. Papers from a Conference held on 9–10 January 1976.Department of Social Security (1993) Households below Average Income: a Statistical Analysis, HMSO, London.Doise, W. and Palmonari, A. (eds.) (1984) Social Interaction and Individual Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.1995) The Impact of Subsidising Childcare, Equal Opportunities Commission, Manchester., and ([Page 169]1993) Young Children's Close Relationships: Beyond Attachment, Sage, London.(Early Years Curriculum Group (1992) The Early Years Curriculum, Trentham Books, Stoke on Trent.Education Enquiry Committee (1929) The Case For Nursery Schools, George Phillip & Son, London.Education, Science and Arts (House of Commons) (1988) Educational Provision for the Under Fives, Vol 1, HMSO, London.1994) Effective Early Years Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.and (1995) Parental Views on the Development of Day Care and Education Services for Children under Eight in England, National Children's Bureau, London.(EC Childcare Network (European Commission Network on Childcare and Other Measures to Reconcile Employment and Family Responsibilities) (1994a) Men as Carers: Towards a Culture of Responsibility, Sharing and Reciprocity between Women and Men in the Care and Upbringing of Children, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.EC Childcare Network (European Commission Network on Childcare and Other Measures to Reconcile Employment and Family Responsibilities) (1994b) Leave Arrangements for Workers with Children, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.EC Childcare Network (European Commission Network on Childcare and Other Measures to Reconcile Employment and Family Responsibilities) (1995) The Costs and Funding of Services for Young Children, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.EC Childcare Network (European Commission Network on Childcare and Other Measures to Reconcile Employment and Family Responsibilities) (forthcoming) Services for Young Children in the European Union 1990–1995, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.1990) Working with Under Fives: In Service Training Pack PE 635, Open University School of Education/Centre for Human Development and Learning, Milton Keynes.(1981) Combined Nursery Centres, MacMillan, London., , and (1897) Pedagogics of the Kindergarten, Edward Arnold, London.(1969) Susan Isaacs, Methuen Educational, London.(1995) Dad, How Did You Learn to Care for Me? The Role of Services for Young Children in Supporting More Equal Sharing of Family Responsibilities, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels., , and (1994) For Richer, For Poorer: the Changing Distribution of Income in the United Kingdom 1961–1991, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.and (1990) Development According to Parents: The Nature, Sources and Consequences of Parents' Ideas, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.and (1995) Trends in parental employment, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 421–44.and (1995) Investing In Young Children ((revised edn) National Children's Bureau, London.1992) Investing In Young Children: Costing and Funding an Educational and Day Care Service for Young Children, National Children's Bureau, London.([Page 170]1994) Children's relationships with peers: different associations with aspects of teacher-child relationships, Child Development, Vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 253–63., and (1989) Comparison of nursery education in Scotland and Guandong Province, China. Unpublished MEd thesis, Glasgow University.(1994) Parents and Their Children's Schools, Blackwell, Oxford., and (1993) Early Education in Jeopardy, Early Years Curriculum Group/BAECE, London., and (1995a) The State We're In, Jonathon Cape, London.(1995b) Forget Austerity era - Britain's rich, Guardian, 16 October.(1929) The Nursery Years: The Mind of the Child from Birth to Six Years, Routledge, London.(1930) Intellectual Growth in Young Children, Lund Humphries, London.(1954) The Educational Value of the Nursery School, Nursery School Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, London.(1994) Winners and Losers: a Portrait of the UK Income Distribution during the 1980s (Swansea Economic Discussion Paper 94–07), Department of Economics, Swansea.(1994) Fragments for a discussion about quality, in P.Moss, and A.Pence (eds.) Valuing Quality in Early Childhood Services, Paul Chapman, London.(1993) Age integrated centres in Denmark, in EC Childcare NetworkAnnual Report 1992, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.(Men as Workers in Services for Young Children, European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit, Brussels.(forthcoming)1984) The Nature of the Child, Basic Books, New York.(1991) Childhood: A Multicultural View, Little, Brown and Company, London.(1993) Poverty and Inequality in the UK: the Effects on Children, National Children's Bureau, London.(Lamb, M., Sternberg, K., Hwang, C. P., and Broberg, A. (eds.) (1992) Childcare in Context, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.1991) Learning to Think, Routledge, London., and (Mallory, B. and New, R. (eds.) (1994) Diversity and Developmentally Appropriate Practice, Teachers College Press, New York.1993) Controversy, Theory and Social Context in Contemporary Day Care Research, Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3–23., , and (1995): Staff-Child Ratios in Care and Education Services for Young Children, HMSO, London., , , and (1930) The Nursery School,(1930 Edition, Dent, London.1991) Maternity Rights in Britain: the PSI Report on the Experience of Women and Employers, Policy Studies Institute, London.(1994) Day Care Services for Children, HMSO, London.(Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (1989) Ejemplificaciones del Diseño Curricular Base: Infantil y Primaria, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid.[Page 171]Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (1991) General Law of Spanish Educational System, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid.Ministry of Education (1944) Education Act 1944, HMSO, London.Ministry of Health (1945) Circular 221/45, HMSO, London.1992) ‘Employee Child Care’ - or services for children, carers and employers, Employee Relations, Vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 20–32.(Moss, P. and Pence, A. (eds.) (1994) Valuing Quality, Paul Chapman, London.Moss, P. (ed.) (1995) Father Figures: Fathers in the Families of the 1990s, HMSO, Edinburgh.1993) Literacy and numeracy events in social interactive contexts, International Journal of Early Years Education, Vol. 1, no. 3.and (National Commission on Education (1993) Learning to Succeed. Report of the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, Heinemann, London.National Union of Teachers (1977) The Needs of the Under Fives, National Union of Teachers, London.1995) Power and Participatory Development, Intermediate Technology Publications, London.and (Nursery World (1995) The Professional Nanny, September 1995, Nursery World, London.OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1994) Education at a Glance, OECD Indicators, OECD, Paris.OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1995) Long-term leave for parents in OECD countries, in Employment Outlook, July 1995, OECD, Paris.1989) How Nations Serve Young Children, High Scope Press, Ypsilanti, Michigan.and (1989) Patterns of pre-school provision in English local authorities, Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 309–28.and (1928) Nursery School Education, Dutton, London.(1836): A New View of Society and other Writings,(1927 edition, Everyman's Library, London.1964) Development and learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 2, pp. 176–86.(1995) Cross-Cultural Partnerships in Training. Paper given at the Institute of Education Early Years Seminar Series, July.(1990) The Rise of Private Nurseries. Paper given at a Local Government Management Board/EOC Conference. INLOGOV. BirminghamUniversity.(1992) The View from Strathclyde. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.(1995a) Nursery education: What is it for?, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 4–9.(1995b) Development of integrated provision for pre-fives in the UK, Early Child Development and Care, Vol. 108, pp. 5–18.(The Relationship of Private Daycare and Nursery Education in the UK, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal.(forthcoming)1992) Learning for All: Right from the Start (Unit 5, Course E242), Open University, Milton Keynes., and (1995) We Are Getting Them Ready for Life, SCRE, Edinburgh., , and (1994) The Sooner the Better: Early Education. Paper given at a Conference ‘Our Children, Our Future’, Birmingham, 18–19 November.([Page 172]1983) War in the Nursery, Virago, London.(1990) Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, Oxford University Press.(School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (1995) Pre-school Education Consultation: Desirable Outcomes for Children's Learning and Guidance for Providers, SCAA, London.1986) Child-initiated activities in early childhood programs may help prevent delinquency, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 303–11., and (1993) A Summary of Significant Benefits: The High Scope Perry Pre-School Study Through Age 27, High Scope UK, Ypsilanti, Michigan., and (1969) Robert Owen on Education, Cambridge University Press.(1995) Psychology, teachers and the early years, International journal of Early Years Education, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–23.(1990) Childhood, Culture and Class in Britain: Margaret McMillan 1860–1931, Virago, London.(1986) The developmental niche: a conceptualization of the interface of child and culture, International Journal of Behavioural Development, Vol. 9, pp. 546–69.and (1983) Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century, Virago, London.(1995) Business Basics, Who Minds Summer, 22–3.(1985) ‘Social relationships between adults and young children and their impact on intellectual functioning’ in R.Hinde, A.-N.Perret-Clermont and J.Stevenson-Hinde, (eds.) Social Relationships and Cognitive Development (Fyssen Foundation Symposium), Clarendon Press, Oxford.(1984) Young Children Learning: Talking and Thinking at Home and at School, Fontana, London.and (1976) All Our Children, Temple-Smith, London., and (Van der Eyken, W. (ed.) (1973) Education, The Child and Society: A Documentary History, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.1978) Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.(1986) Thought and Language (revised and edited by A. Kozulin), MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.(1992) The Nature of Nurture, Sage, London.(1989) High/Scope curriculum in practice, in F.Macleod (ed.) The High/Scope Project (Perspectives 40), School of Education, University of Exeter.(1989) Cultural and universal aspects of social support for children: evidence from the Abuluyia of Kenya, in D.Belle (ed.) Childrens' Social Networks and Social Support, Wiley, New York.(1987) The Meaning Makers: Children Learning Language and Using Language to Learn, Hodder & Stoughton, London.(1975) Children of Six Cultures - A Psycho-Cultural Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.and (1994) Flagships: An Evaluation/Research Study of Community Nurseries in Strathclyde Region 1989–92, Department of Education, University of Glasgow.(1995) Children Speak: Perspectives on their Social Worlds, in Brannen, J. and O'Brien, M. (eds) Childhood and Parenthood (1995) London. Proceedings of the International Sociological Association Committee for Family Research Conference, Institute of Education, pp. 294–308.and ([Page 173]1964) The Child, the Family and the Outside World, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.(1988) How Children Think and team, Blackwell, Oxford.(1988) The case of early childhood intervention, American Psychologist, Vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 443–54.(Working Party on Early Childhood Care and Education (1988) Education to be More, Government Printer, Wellington.[Page 174]