Tools for Teaching in the Block

Books

Roberta L. Sejnost

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Dedication

    This book is dedicated to my husband, Arthur, who supported every page with patience and understanding when dinner was late, the house was a mess, and the laundry piled up while I wrote, revised, and wrote some more. Thanks, Art!

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Preface

    The movement toward the use of “block schedules,” with the main goal of increasing the traditional class period of 45–50 minutes to an extended period of up to 90 minutes, has caused apprehension among many middle and high school teachers. Although good reasons are provided for going to a block schedule, some teachers, already concerned about being able to “reach” an increasingly diverse student population, feel unprepared to teach in longer time periods. Teachers wonder: “Students have a hard enough time sitting for 50 minutes; how can I expect them to sit for 90 minutes?” or “I am not sure I can be creative enough for 90 minutes.”

    Many teachers, committed to reaching all students in their classroom, are searching for ways to best use these new extended periods of time. Rather than merely extending what they had been doing for 50 minutes or simply adding busy work to fill up the time allotments that have been created, teachers want to ensure that they use additional time to actually increase student learning. This book presents research-based best practices and offers a lesson plan format, as well as content area strategies, that enable teachers to increase learning by more effectively integrating reading, writing, and critical thinking into a 90-minute block of instructional time. These strategies are grounded in the theory of multiple intelligences and brain-based research, which can be applied in every classroom, no matter what the subject or grade level. Examples and blackline masters for implementing the strategies are included in this book to assure immediate transfer to all content area classrooms.

    Chapter 1 (Preparing to Teach the Adolescent Learner) paints a picture of adolescent learners and their instructional needs. The chapter details methods to best facilitate adolescent learning, including extending the teaching time in the classroom from the usual 45–50 minutes to an extended period of 90 minutes. In order to assure that effective instruction takes place during this extended period of time, the concept of comprehensive curriculum mapping and organized lesson planning is discussed and examples of curriculum maps and 90-minute lesson plans are provided.

    Chapter 2 (Tools for Teaching in the Block) presents specific techniques that will most effectively and efficiently help teachers deliver the curriculum and lessons they will teach. Specifically, this chapter provides a discussion and examples of (1) cooperative learning strategies, (2) brain-compatible learning strategies, (3) effective questioning techniques and strategies, and (4) the use of graphic organizers.

    Chapter 3 (Entice the Learner) discusses the first phase of the block schedule lesson plan format and provides teachers with strategies to prepare students for learning by fostering recall of their prior knowledge, helping them to set a purpose for reading and learning, teaching them the vocabulary necessary for understanding, and arousing their interest in and motivation for learning.

    Chapter 4 (Enlighten the Learner) presents the second phase of the block schedule lesson plan format. In essence, this chapter suggests strategies teachers may use to help students find the information necessary to allow them to proceed to phase three. Specific strategies presented in this chapter are considered in two categories, teacher-centered strategies and teacher-student interactive strategies.

    Chapter 5 (Engage the Learner) presents the elements of the third phase of the block schedule lesson plan format. In this chapter, teachers are presented strategies and instructional frameworks—such as study guides, note-taking formats, and graphic organizers—that encourage students to actively interact with and process what they have learned by making predictions, keeping their purpose for reading in mind, self-monitoring their understanding, and making connections between what they are learning (new knowledge) and what they already know (old knowledge). These strategies are presented in two categories: strategies for monitoring learning and strategies for guiding learning.

    Chapter 6 (Extend the Learner) presents the final phase of the block schedule time format. During this phase students clarify, reinforce, and extend what they have learned by organizing the information they have gathered and using their critical thinking skills to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate it. In addition, in this phase students have an opportunity to reflect on their learning in order to clarify their understanding, setting them upon the road to lifelong learning. Strategies to accomplish this are the highlight of this chapter.

    Chapter 7 (Enact the Learning) provides readers with a summary of the four-phase lesson plan format as well as a listing of the strategies and activities that are appropriate for use in each phase. In addition, a series of lesson ideas for a range of content area disciplines is presented.

    Acknowledgments

    I wish to thank my colleagues at the Kane County, Illinois, Regional Office of Education and the teachers who teach in Kane County, Illinois, who called my attention to the need to write a book to help teachers effectively teach in a block schedule.

    Publisher's Acknowledgments

    Corwin gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following reviewers:

    • Michael A. Baker
    • Eighth Grade Science Teacher/TAG Coordinator, Memorial Middle School, Albany, OR
    • Jeremy Jones
    • Assistant Professor of Education, Athens State University College of Education, Athens, AL
    • Eve Lindsay
    • Seventh Grade Teacher, Monroe Middle School, San Jose, CA
    • Paul Mack
    • Associate Professor of Education, Maryville University, St. Louis, MO
    • Barbara Meyer
    • Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Illinois State University, Normal, IL

    About the Author

    Roberta L. Sejnost received her master of education from the University of Illinois at Chicago and her doctorate of education in curriculum and instruction from Loyola University, Chicago. She has been a university professor and is currently literacy consultant to the Regional Office of Education, Kane County, Illinois. She has taught social studies, reading, and English at the secondary school level and courses in literacy, authentic assessment, brain-based learning, multiple intelligences, and cooperative learning at the college level. Sejnost is currently the International Reading Association's state coordinator for Illinois and has been a member of the board of directors for the International Reading Association's Secondary Reading Special Interest Group as well as a member of the executive board of the Illinois Reading Council, and she has served as an officer in several of the Illinois Reading Council's special interest groups.

    A nationally recognized staff developer, Roberta is a certified trainer in authentic assessment, brain-based learning, portfolio assessment, multiple intelligences, and reading and writing across content areas. She has presented at more than 200 educational conferences across the country. In addition to authoring this text and coauthoring Reading and Writing Across Content Areas (Corwin, 2007), Dr. Sejnost was featured in the videotapes to accompany Drake University's online course EDDL219—Reading Across the Curriculum. In 1986, she was named Teacher of the Year in her district; in 1993, she was awarded the International Reading Association's Contribution to Literacy Award for the State of Illinois; in 1996, she was recognized in Who's Who of American Educators; in 2003, she was given the Reading Educator of the Year award for 2003 by the Illinois Reading Council; and in 2007, she was awarded a Certificate of Recognition by the Illinois Reading Council for her contributions to literacy in Illinois.

  • References

    ABC News. (1993, January 23). Common miracles—the new revolution in American learning [Television broadcast]. New York: American Broadcasting Corporation.
    Adams, C. (n.d.). Guidelines for Participants in a Socratic Seminar. Retrieved November 6, 2008, from http://www.studyguide.org/socratic_seminar.htm#Guidelines
    Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35 (2), 309-332.
    Alvermann, D. E. (1991). The discussion web: A graphic aid for learning across the curriculum. The Reading Teacher, 45 (2), 92-99.
    Alvermann, D. E., & Phelps, S. F. (2001). Content reading and literacy: Succeeding in today's diverse classrooms. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Armbruster, B., Anderson, T., Armstrong, J., Wise, M., Janisch, C., & Meyer, L. (1991). Reading and questioning in content areas. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23 (1), 35-59.
    Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    At the Turning Point: The Young Adolescent Learner (n.d.). Retrieved November 2, 2008, from http://www.turningpts.org/pdf/YALGuide2.pdf
    Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D.Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. I, pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
    Ball, W. H. (1996). Socratic Questioning: Then and now. In R. L.Canady & M.Rettig, Teaching in the block: Strategies for engaging active learners (pp. 29-64). Cranbury, NJ: Eye on Education.
    Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach to enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Bellanca, J., & Fogarty, R. (2003). Blueprints for achievement in the cooperative classroom. Glenview, IL: Pearson Professional Development.
    Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (1991). Vocabulary instruction in content classes for special needs learners: Why and how?Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 7 (4), 297-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0748763910070403
    Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
    Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Bugaj, S. J. (1999). Teacher/administrator perceptions of intensive scheduling: Implications for secondary gifted students. NASSP Bulletin, 83 (610), 62-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263659908361009
    Burke, K. (2005). How to assess authentic learning (
    4th ed.
    ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Busching, B. A., & Slesinger, B. A. (1995). Authentic questions: What do they look like? Where do they lead?Language Arts, 72 (5), 341-351.
    Caine, R., & Caine, G. (2008). Overview of the systems principles of natural learning. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.cainelearning.com/files/Principles_overview.pdf
    Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Canady, R. L., & Rettig, M. (1995). Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schools. Cranbury, NJ: Eye on Education.
    Canady, R. L., & Rettig, M. (1996). Block scheduling: What is it? Why do it? How do we harness its potential to improve teaching and learning? In R. L.Canady & M.Rettig, Teaching in the block: Strategies for engaging active learners (pp. 1-28). Cranbury, NJ: Eye on Education.
    Carter, C. J. (1997). Why reciprocal teaching?Educational Leadership, 54 (6), 64-68.
    Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Center for Teaching Excellence. (2007a). Level and types of questions. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/Did/docs/QUESTION/quest1.htm
    Center for Teaching Excellence. (2007b). Planning questions. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/Did/docs/QUESTION/quest2.htm
    Ciardello, A. V. (1998). You ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42 (3), 210-219.
    Cioffi, G. (1992). Perspective and experience: Developing critical reading abilities. Journal of Reading, 36 (6), 48-53.
    Commander, N. E., & Smith, B. D. (1996). Learning logs: A tool for cognitive monitoring. Journal of Reading, 39 (6), 446-453.
    Cowen, G., & Cowen, E. (1980). Writing. New York: Wiley.
    Crapse, L. (1995). Helping students construct meaning through their own questions. Journal of Reading, 38 (5), 389-390.
    Crawford, G. B. (2007). Brain-based teaching with adolescent learning in mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Cross, K., & Angelo, T. (1988). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
    deBono, E. (1992). Serious creativity. New York: Harper Collins.
    Dillion, J. T. (2004). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice. New York: Resource.
    Duffelmeyer, F. A., Baum, D. D., & Merkley, D. J. (1987). Maximizing reader-text confrontation with an extended anticipation guide. Journal of Reading, 31 (2), 146-150.
    Durkin, D. (1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 14 (4), 481-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.14.4.2
    Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. London: Oxford University Press.
    Ellis, E. (2004). About graphic organizers: Q & A: What's the big deal with graphic organizers. Northport, AL: Makes Sense Publishing. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://graphicorganizers.com/about.html
    Fisher, D., & Frey, D. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Content area strategies at work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    Fogarty, R. (2002). Brain-compatible classrooms (
    2nd ed.
    ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Fogarty, R., Perkins, D., & Barell. (1992). How to teach for transfer (The mindful school). Palatine, IL: IRI/SkyLight Training and Publishing.
    Gall, M. D. (1984). Synthesis of research on teachers’ questioning. Educational Leadership, 42 (3), 40-47.
    Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
    Gere, A. (Ed.). (1985). Roots in the sawdust: Writing to learn across disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York: Norton.
    Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through later adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
    Guszak, F. J. (1967). Teacher questioning and reading. The Reading Teacher, 21 (3), 227-234.
    Harste, J. C., Short, K., & Burke, C. L. (1988). Creating classrooms for authors. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Harste, J. C., Woodward, V. A., & Burke, C. L. (1984). Language stories and literary lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Herber, H. (1978). Teaching reading in content areas (
    2nd ed.
    ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Heward, W. L. (1994). Three low-tech strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. GardnerIII, D. M.Sainato, J. O.Cooper, T. E.Heron, W. L.Heward, J. W.Eshleman, et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 285-320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Irvin, J. L., Buehl, D. R., & Radcliffe, B. J. (2007). Strategies to enhance literacy and learning in the middle school classroom. Boston: Pearson Education.
    Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment, K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Jacobs, H. H. (2004). Getting results with curriculum mapping. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49 (1), 51-69.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Methods of cooperative learning: What can we prove works?Edina, MN: Cooperative Learning Institute.
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
    Johnston, P. (1985). Writing to learn in science. In R. A.Gere (Ed.), Roots in the sawdust: Writing to learn across disciplines (pp. 92-103). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2003). Models of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Kagan, M., Robertson, L., & Kagan, S. (1995). Cooperative learning structures for classbuilding, San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
    Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers.
    Kamil, M. L. (2003) Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
    Keene, E., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Knight, J. (2005). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Lambert, N. M., & McCombs, B. L. (1998). Introduction: Learner-centered schools and classrooms as a direction for school reform. In N.M.Lambert & B.L.McCombs (Eds.), How students learn (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Langer, J. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 837-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004837
    Linn, R., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20 (8), 15-21.
    Lyman, F. T. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. In A.Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109-113). College Park: University of Maryland Press.
    Manzo, A. V. (1969). The ReQuest procedure. Journal of Reading, 12 (3), 123-126.
    Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollack, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    McGinley, W. J., & Denner, P. R. (1987). Story impressions: A pre-reading/writing activity. Journal of Reading, 31 (3), 248-253.
    McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitude toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (4), 934-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748205
    Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Merenbloom, E. Y., & Kalina, B. A. (2007). Making creative schedules work in middle and high schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
    Middendorf, J., & Kalish, A. (1996). The change-up in lectures [Electronic version]. TRC Newsletter, 8 (1). Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.indiana.edu/~teaching/allabout/pubs/changeups.shtml
    Moore, D. W., Alvermann, D. E., & Hinchman, K. A. (2000). Struggling adolescent readers: A collection of teaching strategies. Newark DE: International Reading Association.
    Moore, D. W., Bean, T. W., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J. A. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43 (1), 97-111.
    Moore, D. W., & Moore, S.A. (1992). Possible sentences. An update. In E. K.Dishner, T. W.Bean, J. E.Readence, & D. W.Moore (Eds.), Reading in the content areas: Improving classroom instruction (
    3rd ed.
    , pp. 196-202). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Morgan, R. F., Meeks, W., Schollaert, A., & Paul, J. (1986). Critical reading/thinking skills for the college student. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
    Moye, V. H. (1997). Conditions that support transfer for change. Arlington Heights, IL: IRI/SkyLight Training and Publishing.
    National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2006). Breaking ranks in the middle. Reston, VA: Author.
    National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
    National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
    Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1999). Teaching to change the world. New York: McGraw-Hill College.
    Oldfather, P., & Dahl, K. (1994). Toward a social constructivist reconceptualization of intrinsic motivation for literacy learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26 (2), 139-158.
    Otis, N., Grouzer, F., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (2), 170-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.170
    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39 (8), 771-777.
    Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, I. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory Into Practice, 41 (1), 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
    Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8 (3), 293-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X%2883%2990018-8
    Paris, S. G., Wasik, B., & Turner, M. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R.Barr, M.Kamil, P.Mosenthal, & P. D.Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. II, pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
    Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8 (8), 317-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X%2883%2990019-X
    Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart minds: From training memories to educating minds. New York: The Free Press.
    Peterson, C. L., Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., O'Neal, S., & Cusenbary, S. (2000). Building reading proficiencies at the secondary level: A guide to resources. Austin: Southwest Texas State University.
    Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69 (4), 309-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.4.309
    Pisapia, J., & Westfall, A. (1997). Alternative high school schedules: A view from the teacher's desk. Research report. Richmond, VA: Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium.
    Queen, J. A. (2000). Block scheduling revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 82 (3), 214-222.
    Raphael, T. E., Au, K. H., & Highfield, K. (2006). QAR now. New York: Scholastic.
    Readence, J. E., Bean, T. W., & Baldwin, R. S. (2004). Content area literacy: An integrated approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Richardson, J. S., & Morgan, R. F. (2003). Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomas, R. G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22 (2), 177-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747664
    Robinson, H. A. (1978, May). Facilitating successful reading strategies. Paper presented at International Reading Association Convention, Houston, TX.
    Rodrigues, R. J. (1983). Tools for developing prewriting skills. English Journal, 72 (2), 58-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/816734
    Roe, B. D., Stoodt-Hill, B. D., & Burns, P. C. (2007). Secondary school literacy instruction: The content areas. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    Royer, J. M., Cisero, C. A., & Carlo, N. S. (1993). Techniques and procedures for assessing cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63 (2), 201-243.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. I. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
    Santa, C. (1988). Content reading including study systems. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Savion, L., & Middendorf, J. (1994). Enhancing concept comprehension and retention. National teaching and learning forum, 3 (4), 6-8.
    Sejnost, R. L., & Thiese, S. (2007). Reading and writing across content areas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Group investigation: A strategy for expanding cooperative learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Silver, H. F., Strong, R. W., & Perini, M. J. (2001). Tools for promoting active, in-depth learning. Woodbridge, NJ: Thoughtful Education Press.
    Simpson, M. L. (1986). PORPE: A writing strategy for studying ad learning in the content areas. Journal of Reading, 29 (5), 410-414.
    Sizer, T. R. (1996). Horace's hope: What works for the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Slavin, R. E. (1994). Using student team learning (
    4th ed.
    ). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
    Smith, P., & Tompkins, G. (1988). Structured notetaking: A new strategy for content areas. Journal of Reading, 32 (1), 46-53.
    Solon, C. (1980). The pyramid diagram: A college study skills tool. Journal of Reading, 23, 594-597.
    Sousa, D. (2006). How the brain learns (
    3rd ed.
    ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Sturtevant, E. (1992). Content literacy in high school social studies. Two case studies in a multicultural setting. Unpublished dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
    Sturtevant, E. G., & Linek, W. M. (2004). Content literacy: An inquiry-based case study approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    Sylwester, R. (1995). A celebration of neurons: An educator's guide to the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15 (3), 399-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747422
    Tompkins, G. E. (2002). Language arts: Content and teaching strategies (
    5th ed.
    ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
    Tompkins, G. E. (2004). 50 literacy strategies: Step by step. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    Unrau, N. J., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100 (1), 81-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
    Vacca, R. T. (2002). From efficient decoders to strategic readers. Educational Leadership, 60 (3), 7-11.
    Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (2008). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. Boston: Pearson Education.
    Van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M.Taylor, M.Graves, & P.Van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1-31). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Vaughan, C. L. (1990). Knitting writing: The double-entry journal. In N.Atwell (Ed.), Coming to know: Writing to learn in the intermediate grades (pp. 69-75). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
    Vaughan, J., & Estes, T. (1986). Reading and reasoning beyond the primary grades. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2005). Questioning and understanding to improve learning and thinking: Teacher manual (
    2nd ed.
    ). Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
    Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (1985). Mental aerobics: The half-sheet response. Innovative Higher Education, 10 (1), 23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00893466
    Whitehead, D. (1994). Teaching literacy and learning strategies through a modified guided silent reading procedure. Journal of Reading, 38 (1), 24-30.
    Whiteley, S. (2005). Memletics concept mapping course. Des Plaines, IL: Advanogy.
    Williams, R. B., & Dunn, S. E. (2008). Brain-compatible learning for the block (
    2nd ed.
    ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Willis, J. (2007). Brain-based teaching strategies for improving students’ memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education, 83 (5), 310-315.
    Wilson, R. C. (1986). Improving faculty teaching: Effective use of the student evaluations and consultants. Journal of Higher Education, 57 (2), 196-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1981481
    Wimer, J. W., Ridenour, C. S., & Thomas, K. (2001). Higher order teacher questioning of boys and girls in elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 95 (2), 84-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670109596576
    Winograd, P., & Hare, V. C. (1988). Direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies: The nature of teacher explanation. In C. E.Weinstein, E. T.Goetz, & P. A.Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 121-139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Wolfe, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Wood, K. D. (1996). Evaluation and testing: The road less traveled. In S. J.Silverman & C. D.Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education (pp. 100-219). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Young, T. A., & Daines, D. (1992). Student's predictive questions and their teachers’ pre-questions about expository text in grades K-5. Reading Psychology, 13 (4), 291-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027027192130402
    Zemelman, S., & Daniels, H. (1988). A community of writers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Corwin a Sage Company

    The Corwin logo—a raven striding across an open book—represents the union of courage and learning. Corwin is committed to improving education for all learners by publishing books and other professional development resources for those serving the field of PreK-12 education. By providing practical, hands-on materials, Corwin continues to carry out the promise of its motto: “Helping Educators Do Their Work Better.”


    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website