Previous Chapter Chapter 6: The Role of Intelligence and Temperament in Interpreting the SES-Crime Relationship Next Chapter

Anthony Walsh, Charlene Y. Taylor & Ilhong Yun

In: The Nurture Versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology: On the Origins of Criminal Behavior and Criminality

Chapter 6: The Role of Intelligence and Temperament in Interpreting the SES-Crime Relationship

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

The Role of Intelligence and Temperament in Interpreting the SES-Crime Relationship
The role of intelligence and temperament in interpreting the SES-crime relationship
AnthonyWalshBoise State University
Charlene Y.TaylorBoise State University
IlhongYunChosun University, South Korea
Socioeconomic Status and Crime

Twenty years ago, Theodore Kemper (1994) noted the importance of socioeconomic status (SES) for understanding social behavior: “Perhaps the fundamental social structure of society is the system of stratification. It so bluntly determines individual conduct, belief, and value preferences, on the one hand, and sheer biological fate on the other … it is the social structure par excellence worthy of close attention” (pp. 47–48). But he also notes that: “if sociology and biology have not been on speaking terms in general, sociological distain for the biological reaches its apogee when it comes to ...

Looks like you are not subscribed to have access to full content on this book.

Please login or subscribe to get access.

If your Institution does not have a subscription and you cannot access the full text of content on the site, find out how your Institution can subscribe.

Back to Top