The Contemporary American Family: A Dialectical Perspective on Communication and Relationships
Publication Year: 2003
The Contemporary American Family: A Dialectical Perspective on Communication and Relationships recognizes that families are both close and distant, stable and changing, amenable and uncontrollable. Teresa Chandler Sabourin employs a dialectical approach, acknowledging that a family’s contradictions and relational tensions may be the determining factor in its interaction. Writing in a direct and simple style, Sabourin uses this innovative theoretical position to address four types of family diversity: structural, cultural, developmental, and functional. Designed as a supplemental text for upper-level undergraduate and graduate courses in Family Communication, The Contemporary American Family is also an invaluable resource for students in Family Studies and Women’s Studies courses.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: A Dialectical Approach to Family
- Conceptual Tools
- Dialectical Management Patterns
- Interface of Culture and Dialectical Management Patterns
- Dialectical Classification: Context and Interaction
- Chapter 2: Defining the Contemporary Family
- Defining the Family
- Criteria for Defining Family
- Chapter 3: The Contemporary Family: Structural Diversity
- Common Family Structures
- Chapter 4: Cultural Diversity in the New American Family
- Religion and Family Culture
- Diversity in Sexual Orientation
- Racial and Ethnic Diversity
- Chapter 5: Developmental Diversity
- Approaches to Development
- Chapter 6: Functional Diversity in the Family: The “Dark Side”
- The Impact of Alcoholism on the Family
- Domestic Violence
- The Dark Side of Divorce
- Chapter 7: Bringing Light into Darkness: Family Spirituality
- A Spiritual Approach to Family
- 12-Step Programs
Copyright © 2003 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Sage Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
Sage Publications Ltd.
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B-42 Panchsheel Enclave
New Delhi 110 017 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Sabourin, Teresa Chandler.
The contemporary American family: a dialectical perspective / by Teresa Chandler Sabourin.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-7619-2445-0—ISBN 0-7619-2446-9 (pbk.)
1. Family-United States. 2. Change (Psychology) I. Title.
03 04 05 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquiring Editor: Margaret H. Seawell
Production Editor: Claudia A. Hoffman
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Indexer: Molly Hall
Cover Designer: Janet Foulger
The completion of this book came about through the support and encouragement of many people. First, I would like to thank my colleagues in the Department of Communication at the University of Cincinnati: Gail Fairhurst, Steve Depoe, Barbara Reckers, and Nuha Nasrallah. I am also indebted to the graduate and undergraduate students who have shared their wisdom and diversity with me.
Special thanks go to my Sage editor, Margaret Seawell, for her continuing interest and confidence in this project. I would also like to thank Claudia Hoffman, my production editor, and Cheryl Adam, my copy editor, for their help in getting the manuscript into top form.
I wish also to thank my family of origin, the Chandlers. My parents, Mary Lou and Harry, who both passed away in the time since I began this project, always valued and supported my academic goals. My sister and best friend, Julia, has been unwaveringly loyal through both good times and bad. My brother Steve has given me consistent encouragement to follow in our dad's footsteps through my writing. I am also grateful to my sister Susan, whose graciousness has always provided a refuge from life's harsher realities. From afar, my brother Mike has continued to be a source of warmth and light.
Finally, I am grateful beyond belief for being able to share my life with Gary and Clay Sabourin. Throughout this project, they have been constant sources of inspiration, perspective, and good humor.[Page viii]
Preface[Page ix]How I Came to Write this Book
For many of us, the inspiration for studying interpersonal communication originated in the history of our own personal relationships. We were drawn to interpersonal studies because we wanted to understand, explain, or improve our friendships, marriage, families, and other long-term relationships. At one time or another, most of us have paused to consider how (or why) some people are drawn together, some stay together, and some pull apart.—, 1990, p. 16
Four experiences encouraged me to question the traditional portrayal of families.
The first happened about 10 year ago when an older student challenged my choice of a text and my emphasis on white, middle-class, nuclear families. At the time, I wasn't the least bit aware of my bias. I considered myself to be an innovator, unafraid to challenge societal norms. Instead, I came to realize that I was a purveyor of the myth of homogeneity. Uncomfortable with and unsure of how to adjust my teaching, I was nonetheless sure I needed to find a way to answer this student's challenge.
My perspective on family life broadened further when I entered a spiritually based recovery program. Here, I found a part of the piece that was missing. I discovered that families affected [Page x]by chemical dependencies (alcohol, drugs, eating disorders, and others) did not develop or communicate in the same logical ways that were described in the mainstream literature. In my weekly recovery group meetings, I identified more personally with the stories of family life than I ever did during my years of formal study. In the academic literature, a family was one of two things: functional or dysfunctional. There was no in-between. In my own life and the lives of the students that I was teaching, there seemed to be a lot of in between. These gray areas spurred me on to find a way to combine in a meaningful way what I was learning in recovery with my academic knowledge of family life.
The next step on my path was coming across the dialectical way of thinking about family life. During my doctoral program and during subsequent teaching and research as a professor, I found myself specializing in the study of abusive families. From the rational approaches that I had studied formally, abusive families really did not make sense. How can family members both abuse others in their families and care about them at the same time? The literature on men who batter their wives and my forays into the public to discuss abuse as an expert almost always led to the same question: “Why does she stay?” The answers from dualistic approaches did not satisfy.
Then I came across Rawlins's (1992) book on a dialectical approach to friendship. As soon as I read about this perspective as a way to embrace—rather than solve—relational contradictions, I knew I had found my missing piece. I began to read everything I could find on dialectical approaches to friendship. I have since broadened my understanding through reading the works of others who have adopted this way of seeing, and I have applied a dialectical view to my own research and teaching. Even my students, who tend to shrink in the face of theory, can tell that this way of thinking, which validates all manifestations of family structure and culture, has intrinsic merit.
The fourth change that I happened into that again altered my sense of certainty about the ways in which families should be, was [Page xi]to remarry at the age of 35. The man that I married had his own unique background and family experience that did not conform to my prior convictions about how families are. The diversity factor was kicked into even higher gear when our son was born 13 years ago. Parents know how having children makes academic literature seem incomplete as a guide to effective parenting.
As communication experts have evolved in their methods of studying intimate relationships, they have moved from using primarily linear self-reported descriptions of relationships to using more dualistic, observer-based views of dyadic interactions. Although the latter is an improvement on the former, we need to go even further to satisfy our “curiosity about the perplexing dilemmas of social life” (Bochner, Cissna, & Garko, 1990, p. 16). The dialectic perspective, I believe, provides a way to view these dilemmas and gives a direction to proceed in our evolution.
This book is about diversity and the dilemmas of living in families with competing demands. The dialectical approach is a map but not the territory, a powerful tool that allows us to answer the increasing calls that diversity will make on us in the 21st century.Audiences for the Book
Perhaps it is fitting that diverse sources motivated me to write this book. As a teacher of family communication for 18 years, I have been blessed with students of all cultural, racial, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Other texts do not adequately address the diversity I find in my students. I wrote this book for them, and for myself as a teacher so that I could consolidate the materials I have found valuable in our journey of learning about families with diverse structures and cultures.
I also wrote this book because I felt called to take a stand on our society's need to embrace and honor the emerging diversities of our families’ structures and cultures. As I teach, I cannot help [Page xii]but recognize that the quality of my students’ family experiences does not depend on their families’ structural or cultural backgrounds. It would be presumptuous at best and ignorant at worst for me to teach them otherwise. I believe that professionals who work with families—counselors, social workers, ministers, therapists, and others—will find this book thought-provoking and relevant to their concerns about diversity.
Another source of motivation has been my participation in a spiritually based recovery program. There I have heard many stories of family life that defy the neat and tidy descriptions found in most textbooks. Though they come from every type of structural and cultural background imaginable, these families’ successes in finding creative ways to deal with potentially devastating adversity have extended my formal education invaluably. I also wish to share my own experiences and understandings with them.
I also hope, in writing this book, to stimulate discussion among scholars and encourage further research on issues of family diversity. As we grow into the new millennium, cultural and structural variations in family life are bound to multiply, and we will need to focus our attention on how to best study and explore these changes.
I hope readers will see this book as an invitation for discussion rather than an argument for “the truth.” Although I am very passionate about the materials presented here, I know that they will change and improve as others consider them. If you are a student of the family and want to view contemporary family life in America, this book is for you.Structure
I organized the book around seven topics, each related to the main subject of family diversity. Chapter 1 outlines the theoretical perspective of dialectics, adopted here for its eloquence and its power [Page xiii]to embrace diversity. Chapter 2 introduces criteria that can account for diversity in definitional procedures. Chapters 3 and 4 deal with some specific examples of structural and cultural diversity, highlighting nuclear, single-parent, and blended families and those families whose members vary in religion, race, or sexual orientation. In Chapter 5, we look at developmental diversity, including both predictable and unpredictable models of family change. Chapters 6 and 7 introduce the concept of functional diversity, which is another way to express how families can become more or less dysfunctional through their life experiences. Chapter 6 focuses on the “dark side” of family life and examines how alcoholism, abuse, and divorce affect the American family. In Chapter 7, we view some of the ways that families’ spiritual beliefs and practices serve as resources for facing structural and cultural challenges.
Taken together, these chapters provide a cohesive examination of real families: our diversity, our ways of functioning, our structural makeup, and the communicative resources we use to simultaneously hold our families together and to let them move apart.[Page xiv]
References[Page 157][Page 164](1985). Codependency: A second hand life. Center City, MN: Hazelden.(1993). Reflexivity in teaching about families. Family Relations, 42, 351–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585566, &(2000). Families in the middle and later years: A review and critique of research in the 1990's. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 911–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00911.x, , &(2000). Gay/lesbian families over the life course. In S. J.Price, P. C.McKenry, & M. J.Murphy (Eds.), Families across time: A life course perspective (pp. 51–63). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury., &(1999). Children of divorced parents as young adults. In E. M.Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage (pp. 147–164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1996). A preliminary analysis of conflict narratives in lesbian relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA., &(1968). One day at a time in Al-Anon. New York: Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, Inc..(2002). Alcoholics anonymous: The story of how many thousands of men and women have recovered from alcoholism (.Rev. ed.). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.(2001, December 31). New Year's Day bringing new laws. Cincinnati Post, 2A..(1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford., & [Page 158](1997). Personal relationships in later life families. In S. W.Duck (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships (, &2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.(1995). The discovery that an offspring is gay: Parents', gay men's, and lesbian's perspectives. Journal of Homosexuality, 30, 89–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v30n01_05(1993). Responsibilities in studying postmodern families. journal of Family Issues, 14, 35–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X93014001004(1990). Optional metaphors for studying interaction. In B. M.Montgomery & S.Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 16–31). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., , &(1988). The family: A revolutionary way of self-discovery. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications, Inc.(1994). Restoring peace to violent families. Tampa, FL: The Spring of Tampa Bay.(1991). Marriages and families. New York: HarperCollins.(1986). A profile of interaction in acute battering incidents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.(1986). An existential/dialectical model for analyzing marital functioning and interaction. Family Process, 25, 571–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00571.x(1989). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 57, 47–61., , &(1998). Early adolescent gateway drug use in sons of fathers with substance abuse disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 23, 561–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603%2898%2900038-0, , &(2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1228–1302., , &(2000). Historical perspectives on family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 283–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00283.x(1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 559–564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.4.559, , , , &(1996). Stages of stepfamily development as transition points in spiritual growth as illustrated by the traditional Zen [Page 159]oxherding pictures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.(2000). Stepfamily development and spiritual growth: Creating an alternative model. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, University of Cincinnati., &(1979). A theory of rule-structure and types of episodes, and a study of perceived enmeshment in undesired repetitive patterns (URPs). Communication Yearbook, 3, 225–240., , &(2000). Remarried families over the life course. In S. J.Price, P. C.McKenry, & M. J.Murphy (Eds.), Families Across Time: A Life Course Perspective (pp. 37–50). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury., &(1990). Where is all said and done?Communication Research, 17(4), 421–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365090017004001, &(1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345, &(1988). An analysis of relational control patterns in couples. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University.(1997). Confronting nuclear family bias in stepfamily research. In I.Leven & Sussman (Eds.), Stepfamilies: History, research and policy (pp. 41–69). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.(1997). How society views families. Marriage and Family Review, 25, 85–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v26n01_06, &(1997). Current knowledge about child abuse in step-families. Marriage and Family Review, 25, 215–230.(2000, April 23). Just another Cuban family saga. The New York Times Magazine, 62–67, 88, 95–96.(1993). Mysteries of the future told: Communication as the material manifestation of spirituality. World Communication, 22, 40–49.(1989). The relationship between marital interaction and marital satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47, &(2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927–947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.x, &(2000). Our kind of people: Inside America's black upper class. New York: Harper Perennial.[Page 160](1985). Intercultural marriages: An intrareligious perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 427–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767%2885%2990059-8, , &(1978). Attribution in the context of conflict and separation in close relationships. In J.Harvey, W.Ickes, & R.Kidd (Eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 2 (pp. 230–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., , &(1996, January 31). Family values, Christian values: A round-table discussion. The Christian Century, 104–111.(1999). Should we stay together for the sake of the children? In E. M.Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage (pp. 93–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1995). A conceptualization of parenting: Examining the single parent family. Marriage and Family Review, 20, 43–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v20n01_03(1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon Books.(1997). Family life education programs for stepfamilies. Marriage and Family Review, 25, 281–300., &(1989). Where is the “family” in family communication?: Exploring families' self-definitions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 17, 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909888909365282(1990). Personality characteristics of sons of alcohol abusers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51, 142–147., &(1993). The relation between family structure and young adolescents' appraisals of family climate and parenting behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 279–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251393014002007, &(1996). Family-centered practice with lesbian and gay families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 559–572.(1955). Gift from the sea. New York: Pantheon.(1999). Family communication as a mediator of child adjustment to divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 30, 83–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v30n01_06, , &(1998). African-American families: Strengths and realities. In J.Futrell, H. I.McCubbin, E. A.Thompson, & A. I.Thompson (Eds.), Resiliency in African-American Families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.[Page 161](2000). Marital processes and parental socialization in families of color: A decade of review of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1070–1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01070.x, , , &(1994, Winter). Veil of tears: The church is part of our divorce problem—And solution. Policy Review, 50–57.(1997). The role of coping, social support, and family communication in explaining the self-esteem of adult children of alcoholics. Communication Reports, 10, 9–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934219709367655(1984). A model for stepfamily development. Family Relations, 33, 365–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584707(2000). Religion and families over the life course. In S. J.Price, P. CMcKenry, & M. J.Murphy (Eds.), Families Across Time: A Life Course Perspective (pp. 173–186). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.(1992a). A dialectical approach to reconceptualizing familial and marital relationship maintenance. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.(1992b). Communication as the interface between couples and culture. Communication Yearbook, 15, 475–507.(1994). Soulmates: Honoring the mysteries of love and relationship. New York: Harper Perennial.(1998). Difference and diversity: Gay and lesbian couples. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.(1995). Social work practices with religious families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 53, 360–368., &(1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems I: Cohesion and adaptability dimension, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x, , &(1984). The stepfamily cycle: An experimental model of stepfamily development. Family Relations, 33, 355–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584706(1991). A multiple regression analysis of family factors affecting the potential for alcoholism in college students. Adolescence, 26, 341–347.(1992). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Child Development, 63, 1025–1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131517(2000). Family relationships of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1052–1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01052.x[Page 162](1997). Stepfamilies from a historical perspective. Marriage and Family Review, 25, 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v26n01_02(1985). Will the real me please stand up. Allen, TX: Tabor., &(2000). “The Normal American Family” as an interpretive structure of family life among grown children of Korean and Vietnamese immigrants. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 240–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00240.x(1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.(1993). Power, other, and spirit in cultural texts. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 159–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319309374439(1995). The role of negative reciprocity in spouse abuse: A relational control analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 271–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889509365431(1996). Premises for a spiritual approach to family communication. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.(2000). Visual portrayals of the real vs. ideal dialectic in early marriage. Unpublished study, Department of Communication, University of Cincinnati.(1995). Communication and the experience of dialectical tensions in family life: An examination of abusive and non-abusive families. Communication Monographs, 62, 213–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376358, &(1993). New action theory and contemporary families. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 105–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X93014001009, &(1999). Deconstructing the essential father. The American Psychologist, 54, 397–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.397, &(1993). Finding the spiritual dimension in rhetoric. World Journal of Communication, 57, 261–271.(1999). On the road to same-sex marriage. New York: World Press., &(1994). The dark side of “normal” family interaction. In W. R.Cupach & B. H.Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 259–280). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., &(1994). An appropriation of the parental role through communication during the transition to parenthood. Communication Monographs, 61, 89–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376327[Page 163](1985). The use of force for resolving family conflict: The training ground for abuse. Family Coordinator, 26, 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/581856(1985). Secrets of strong families. Boston: Little, Brown., &(2000). The changing demography of America's families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1234–1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01234.x, , &(1998). Indigenous resources and strategies of resistance: Informal caregiving and racial socialization in black communities. In J.Futrell, H. I.McCubbin, E. A.Thompson, & A. I.Thompson (Eds.), Resiliency in African-American families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1993). Emotional abuse: What it is and how it hurts us. Center City, MN: Hazelden.(1993). Family from a dyadic perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 92–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X93014001008(1990). Toward a research agenda for a spiritual rhetoric. The Journal of Communication and Religion, 66–73.(1991). A spiritual view of symbolic processes. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.(2000). America's families and living arrangement: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: Author.(1994). Intervention for men who abuse women. Unpublished program manual. Cincinnati, OH: YWCA., , &(1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.(1995). Communication in lesbian and gay families: Developing a descriptive base. In T.Socha & G.Stamp (Eds.), Parents, children, and communication (pp. 147–170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., &(1983). The church and the family. Religious Education, 78, 249–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034408300780210(1989). Sacred dwelling: A spirituality of family life. New York: Crossroads.(1984). The epigensis of relational systems: A model for understanding family development. Family Process, 23, 297–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00297.x(1995). Understanding family communication. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick., , &
About the Author