Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction
Publication Year: 1996
ߢThis is an admirable book which can be recommended to students with confidence, and is likely also to become an indispensable source of reference for those researching fact constructionߣ ࡆ Discourse & Society. How is reality manufactured? The idea of social construction has become a commonplace of much social research, yet precisely what is constructed, and how, and even what constructionism means, is often unclear or taken for granted. In this major work, Jonathan Potter offers a fascinating tour of the central themes raised by these questions. Representing Reality overviews the different traditions in constructionist thought.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Welcome to the Fact Factory
- Overview of the Book
- Chapter 1: Social Studies of Science
- Traditional Sociology of Science
- Philosophy and Scientific Facts
- Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
- Constructionist and Interest Theories of Scientific Fact Making
- Realism, Relativism and Rhetoric
- Chapter 2: Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis
- Pollner and Mundane Reason
- Conversation Analysis
- Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Factual Discourse
- Chapter 3: Semiology – Post-Structuralism – Postmodernism
- Facts and the Structuralist Tradition
- Chapter 4: Discourse and Construction
- Some Stories of Construction
- Discourse, Mental Furniture and Rhetoric
- The Action Orientation of Description
- The Epistemological Orientation of Description
- Combining Action and Epistemology
- Chapter 5: Interests and Category Entitlements
- Stake and Interest
- Category Entitlement
- Footing, Neutrality and Alignment
- Stake, Entitlement and Footing
- Chapter 6: Constructing Out-There-Ness
- Empiricist Discourse
- Consensus and Corroboration
- Detail and Narrative
- Truth is Stranger than Fiction
- Chapter 7: Working Up Representations
- Categorization and Ontological Gerrymandering
- Extrematization and Minimization
- Normalization and Abnormalization
- Representations in Action
- Chapter 8: Criticizing Facts
- Facts, Speech Acts and Constructionism
- Social Science and Fact Construction
- Criticizing Facts
© Jonathan Potter 1996
First published 1996
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the Publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
SAGE Publications Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
32, M-Block Market
Greater Kailash – I
New Delhi I 10 048
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 0-8039-8410 3
ISBN 0-8039-841 1 I (pbk)
Library of Congress catalog record available
Typeset by M Rules
Printed in Great Britain by The Cromwell Press Ltd,
Broughton Grifford, Melksham, Wiltshire
For Michael Mulkay and Peter Stringer[Page vi]
This is the first description in a book about the business done with descriptions. The book is asking how people construct their world in their talk and texts, and what is done with those constructions. Acknowledgements do business of all sorts and are often the occasion for some pretty ambitious psychology and sociology. They are fenced around by conventions – even the ironies on the conventions are conventional! How is it possible to acknowledge influence and debt? What is visible and what is transparent? What discourses should be drawn upon to constitute the world of acknowledgement?
Let me start more psychoanalytically with my parents – Mary and Percy. Of course, if this was a serious psychoanalytic account I would refer to their toilet training but, given that this might be family reading, I will stress, instead, their wonderful combination of (almost) thoroughgoing scepticism and sense of social responsibility.
For a somewhat more recent socialization account, I want to thank my PhD supervisors. Indeed, I have dedicated the book to them. In Peter Stringer and Michael Mulkay I was blessed with two supervisors (at different times) who each combined enormous originality of their own with wonderful support for me, personally and intellectually. I cite them occasionally in the book that follows – but that does not do justice to the enduring impact that they have had on my thinking and approach to social science.
To bring out some issues in sociology and ideology, I would like to thank my wife for staying at home and giving me such wonderful support. I can't thank her, however, as I am not married. Margaret Wetherell who was originally going to write this with me got bored with waiting and wrote a book about men and masculinity instead (surely a coincidence!). So I blame the shortcomings in my book on her lack of input, but have to accept that many of its qualities are a result of the specific comments that she made on draft chapters as well as her general intellectual example.
By rights, Sue Jones and Ziyad Marar from Sage ought to be part of an economic and practical account. But, by chance or otherwise, I have dealt with two Sage editors who were genuine academics who made valuable contributions to the content of this work.
My immediate social network has been great. I have written so much with Derek Edwards recently that it seems odd to be writing something without him. Luckily he was there with detailed suggestions and long discussions about the ideas developed here. The book would have been very different [Page x]without his intellect, support and wit. Mick Billig and Malcolm Ashmore provided further intellect and humour in spades.
Over the years Loughborough's Discourse and Rhetoric Group has provided a nurturing, although always argumentative, environment for exploring these ideas. I am particularly conscious of the input from Anne Smith, Ava Horowitz, Belinda Cripps, Dave Middleton, Jon Fong, Katie Macmillan, Mick Roffe, Mike Gane, Sumiko Mushakoji. Outside of Loughborough, I received helpful comments on various drafts from Anna Madill, Alexa Hepburn, Kathy Doherty, David Bamberg, Hedwig te Moulder, Nancy Budwig and Nigel Edley.
In direct institutional terms, the United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council provided support (grant R000231439) for the work on making a current affairs television film that is drawn on occasionally through the book. More importantly, the Social Sciences Department at Loughborough University has housed, paid and supported me throughout.
Last, but by no means least, I am particularly grateful to the various people who allowed their talk to be recorded and used for the research on which this book depends. Without them nothing would have been possible.
Appendix Transcription Conventions[Page 233]
The transcription conventions used in this book are based on the system developed by Gail Jefferson (for example, Jefferson, 1985; Sacks et al., 1974). The system evolved to use symbols mainly available in a standard typewriter character set and to pick out features of talk that conversation analysts found important in interaction. Useful summaries of this system can be found in most collections of papers in conversation analysis (e.g. ten Have and Psathas, 1995). A more thoroughgoing overview and discussion of using transcript in practice is provided by Psathas and Anderson (1990).
Most of the conventions in the Jeffersonian system can be illustrated briefly using the following extract from Chapter 7:
Have, P. ten and Psathas, G. (eds) Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Washington. DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.1985) ‘An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter’, in T.van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3 (pp. 25–34). London: Academic Press., (1990) ‘The “practices” of transcription in conversation analysis’, Semiotica, 78: 75–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/10.1515/semi.1990.78.1-2.75and (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language, 50(4): 696–735. Reprinted in J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 7–55). New York: Academic Press., , and (
- Underlining (walked out) indicates words or parts of words which are stressed by the speaker.
- Colons mark the prolongation of the sound immediately before (the:n); more colons would show a longer prolongation (Ah:::).
- Arrows precede marked rises and falls in intonation (↑Oka↓y).
- The question mark in line 1 marks a questioning intonation (there is no necessary correspondence with utterances participants treat as questions).
- The full stop (for example, in line 2) marks a completing intonation (not necessarily a grammatical full stop).
- The comma in line 6 marks a continuing intonation (not necessarily a grammatical comma).
- A dash (for example, Thanks- Tha:nksgiving) marks a noticeable and abrupt termination of a word or sound.
- The brackets across lines 2 and 3, 8 and 9, 10 and 11 mark the onset and completion of overlapping talk. [Page 234]
- Where one turn runs into another with no interval this is marked by an equals symbol (lines 1 and 2, 9 and 11).
- Numbers in brackets (0.5) are the times of pauses in tenths of a second; where there is just a full stop in a bracket (.) this is a pause which is hearable but too short to measure.
- Talk that is quieter than the surrounding talk is enclosed by degree symbols: °Yeh°.
- Talk that is louder than the surrounding talk is capitalized (WHERE).
- Arrows in the margin (line 7) simply pick out lines of transcript for discussion in the text; they do not mark features of delivery.
- Where the transcriber is doubtful of a word or phrase it will be placed in parentheses; if no guess is plausible these parentheses are left empty.
- Clarifactory comment is placed in double parentheses: ((laughs)), ((stands up)).
- Where material from the tape has been omitted for reasons of brevity this is indicated by square brackets around three full stops […].
- The code at the end of the transcript provides a range of information. For example, this extract is from a transcript produced by Derek Edwards and Jon Fong (DE-JF). The talk is from the second couple in the sample (C2) in their first session (S1) and it appears on the fourth page of the transcript.
References[Page 235]1995) ‘Dominance and entitlement: the rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women’, Discourse and Society, 6: 387–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006003006, and (1988) ‘The fixation of (visual) evidence’, Human Studies, 11: 133–69.and (1993) Imagined Communities. London: Verso.(1994) ‘The many and varied social constructions of intelligence’, in T.R.Sarbin and J.I.Kitsuse (eds), Constructing the Social. London: Sage.(1994) Explaining and Arguing: the Social Organization of Accounts. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1988) ‘The life and opinions of a replication claim: reflexivity and symmetry in the sociology of scientific knowledge’, in S.Woolgar (ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage.(1989) The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1993) ‘The theatre of the blind: starring a Promethean prankster, a phoney phenomenon, a prism, a pocket, and a piece of Wood’, Social Studies of Science, 23: 67–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631293023001003(1995) ‘Fraud by numbers: quantification rhetoric in the Piltdown forgery discovery’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 94: 591–618.(1989) Health and Efficiency: a Sociological Study of Health Economics. Milton Keynes: Open University Press., and (1995) ‘Discourse, rhetoric and reflexivity: seven days in the library’, in S.Jasanoff, G.Markle, T.Pinch and J.Petersen (eds), Handbook of Science, Technology and Society. London: Sage, pp. 321–42., and (Ashmore, M., Wooffitt, R. and Harding, S. (eds) (1994), ‘Humans and others: the concept of “agency” and its attribution’, Special issue of American Behavioral Scientist, 37 (6).1978) Discovering Suicide: Studies in the Social Organization of Sudden Death. London: Macmillan.(1984) Our Master's Voices: the Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.(1979) Order in Court: the Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.and (1990) The Ethnographic Imagination: the Textual Construction of Reality. London: Routledge.(1995) Medical Talk and Medical Work. London: Sage.(1995) ‘You punched him, didn't you': versions of violence in accusatory interviews’, Discourse and Society, 6: 353–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006003005, and (1957) Mimesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.(1995) Social Cognition: an Integrated Introduction. London: Sage.and (1961) ‘A plea for excuses’, in J.D.Urmson and G.Warnock (eds), Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.(1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.(1984) Language, Sense and Nonsense. Oxford: Blackwell.and ([Page 236]1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.(1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.(1993) ‘First person, second person, same person: narrative as epistemology’, New Literary History, 24: 293–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/469408(1991) ‘Revisiting the Gulf of Tonkin crisis: an analysis of the private communication of President Johnson and his advisers’, Discourse and Society, 2: 28–96.(1977) Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge.(1981) ‘On the conventional character of knowledge and cognition’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 303–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100303(1982) T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. London: Macmillan.(1972) Mythologies. London: Paladin.(1974) S/Z. London: Jonathan Cape.(1977) Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.(1981) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York; Hill & Wang.(1983) The Fashion System. London: Cape.(1981) Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.and (1993) Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.and (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.and (Bijker, W.E. and Pinch, T. (eds) (1992) Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.1982) Ideology and Social Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(1987) Arguing and Thinking: a Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1989) ‘Conservatism and the rhetoric of rhetoric’, Economy and Society, 18: 132–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085148900000007(1991) Ideologies and Beliefs. London: Sage.(1992) Talking of the Royal Family. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203414910(1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221648(1988) Ideological Dilemmas: a Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage., , , , and (1987) ‘The concept of preference in conversation analysis’, Language in Society, 17: 161–81.(1982) ‘Durkheim and Mauss revisited: classification and the sociology of knowledge’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 13: 267–97.(1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery,(2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1992) ‘The organization of talk’, Qualitative Sociology (special issue on ethnomethodology), 15: 273–95.(1989) ‘Taking account of the hostile native: plausible deniability and the production of conventional history in the Iran-Contra hearings’, Social Problems, 36: 197–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1989.36.3.03a00010and (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1992) ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science, Part 2’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 22: 46–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839319202200103(1995) ‘Telling problems in an initial family therapy session: the hierarchical organization of problem-talk’, in G.H.Morris and R.J.Chenail (eds), The Talk of the Clinic: Explorations in the Analysis of Medical and Therapeutic Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.and (1993) ‘A disagreement over agreement and consensus in constructionist sociology’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23: 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1993.tb00228.xand (1995) ‘Four models for the dynamics of science’, in S.Jasanoff, G.Markle, T.Pinch and J.Petersen (eds), Handbook of Science, Technology and Society. London: Sage.(1995) ‘Agency and the hybrid collectif’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 94: 481–507.and ([Page 237]1992) What is This Thing Called Science?: an Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and Its Methods,(2nd edn, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.(1966) Cartesian Linguistics: a Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row.(1964) Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.(1974) Theory and Method in a Study of Argentine Fertility. New York: Wiley.(1992) ‘Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news-interview discourse’, in P.Drew and J.Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.E. (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.1994) ‘Anomalous language in sexual assault trial judgements’, Discourse and Society, 5: 189–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005002003, and (1992) Persuading People: an Introduction to Rhetoric. London: Macmillan.and (1975) ‘The seven sexes: a study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics’, Sociology, 9: 205–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003803857500900202(1981) ‘What is TRASP? The radical programme as a methodological imperative’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 215–24.(1983a) ‘An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge’, in K.D.Knorr Cetina and M.Mulkay (eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.(1983b) ‘The meaning of lies: accounts of action and participatory research’, in G.N.Gilbert and P.Abell (eds), Accounts and Action. Aldershot: Gower.(1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage.(1976) ‘Recovering relativity: did prophecy fail?’ Social Studies of Science, 6: 423–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277600600307and (1982) Frames of Meaning: the Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge.and (1993) The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. Cambridge: Canto.and (1986) Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell.(Costall, A. and Still, A. (eds) (1991) Against Cognitivism: Alternative Foundations for Cognitive Psychology. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.1979). ‘Beliefs and practical understanding’, in G.Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.(1982) ‘Remarks on the conceptualization of social structure’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 12: 33–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318201200102(1983) Rethinking Cognitive Theory. London: Macmillan.(1991) ‘Cognition: cognition in an ethnomethodological mode’, in G.Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(Crittenden, R. and Potter, C. (eds) (1986) ‘Confronting reality: some perspectives on documentary’ Cilect Revue: the International Journal for Film and Television Schools (special issue), 2.1975) Structuralist poetics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203449769(1976) Saussure. London: Fontana.(1983) On Deconstruction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.(1991) Knowledge, Ideology and Discourse: a Sociological Perspective. London: Routledge.(1995) Childhood Sexual Abuse and the Construction of Identity: Healing Sylvia. London: Taylor & Francis.(1976) Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.(1977a) ‘Signature event context’, Glyph, 1: 172–97.(1977b) ‘Limited Inc. abc …’, Glyph, 2: 162–254.([Page 238]1982) White mythology: metaphor in the text of philosophy, in J.Derrida, Margins of Philosophy. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1991) Contending Rhetorics: Writing in Academic Disciplines. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.(1978) ‘Accusations: the occasioned use of members' knowledge of religious geography in describing events’, Sociology, 12: 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200102(1984) ‘Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences’, in J.M.Atkinson and J.C.Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1992) ‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape’, in P.Drew and J.C.Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1995) ‘Conversation analysis: the sequential analysis of intersubjectivity in conversation’, in J.Smith, R.Harré, L.van Langenhove and P.Stearns (eds), Rethinking Psychology, vol. 2: Alternative Methodologies. London: Sage.(1992) ‘Analyzing talk at work: an introduction’, in P.Drew and J.Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and (1989) ‘Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints’, Social Problems, 35: 398–417.and (The role of idioms in the organization of topic in conversation’, in M.Everaert et al. (eds), Idioms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.and (Forthcoming) ‘1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.and (1962) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. New York: Atheneum.(1992) ‘Intentions, sell, and responsibility: an essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics’, in J.H.Hill and J.T.Irvine (eds) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1993) ‘Prince Charles – our flexible friend: accounting for variations in constructions of identity’, Text, 13: 397–422.(1994a) ‘Script formulations: a study of event descriptions in conversation’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13: 211–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94133001(1994b) ‘Whorf's empty gasoline drum and the Pope's missing wife’, Journal of Pragmatics, 22: 215–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2894%2990070-1(1995) ‘Two to tango: script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28: 319–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2804_1(1996) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221785(1995) ‘Death and furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism’, History of the Human Sciences, 8: 25–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095269519500800202, and (1987) Common Knowledge: the Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Routledge.and (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.and (1993) ‘Language and causation: a discursive action model of description and attribution’, Psychological Review, 100: 23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.23and (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.(1993) ‘Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse’, Discourse and Society, 4: 133–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002(Featherstone, M. (ed.) (1992) Cultural Theory and Cultural Change. London: Sage.1975) Against Method. London: New Left Books.(1978). Reading Television. London: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203356623and (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.(1977) Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.(1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.(Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (eds) (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge.[Page 239]1995) ‘On the motives for the new sociology of science’, History of the Human Sciences, 7: 287–91.(1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.(1980) Narrative Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(1994) Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1982) ‘Warranting scientific belief’, Social Studies of Science, 12: 383–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631282012003002and (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and (1995) ‘Public policy and discourse analysis: A rhetorical approach’, Mimeo., and (Glasgow Media Group (1982) Really Bad News. London: Writers & Readers.1979) ‘Footing’, Semiotica, 25: 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(1987) ‘Forgetfulness as an interactive resource’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 50: 115–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786746(1995) ‘Seeing in depth’, Social Studies of Science, 25: 237–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631295025002002(1987) The Linguistic Construction of Reality. London: Croom Helm.(1986) ‘Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: the use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees’, Media, Culture and Society, 8: 44–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005(1990) What is Family?Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.and (1989) ‘Constructing the ownership of social problems: fun and profit in the welfare state’, Social Problems, 36: 431–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1989.36.5.03x0003c(1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814563(1990) ‘“Role” as an interactional device’, Social Problems, 37: 564–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1990.37.4.03a00100(1992) ‘Hearing talk: accomplishing answers and generating facts’, Perspectives on Social Problems, 4: 25–45.(1983) Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: Tavistock.and (1969) Perception and Discovery. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.(1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. London: Routledge.(1991) ‘A cyborg manifesto: science, technology and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century’, in , Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.(1992) ‘When Man™ is on the menu’, in J.Crary, and S.Kwinter (eds), Incorporations. New York: Zone Books.(1991) ‘Varieties of positioning’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21: 393–408.and (1981) The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.(1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(1974) ‘Assessing people’, in N.Armistead (ed.), Reconstructing Social Psychology. London: Penguin.(1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.(1988) ‘Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic perspective’, in C.Antaki (ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation: a Casebook of Methods. London: Sage.(1990/91) ‘Intention, meaning and strategy: observations on constraints in interaction analysis’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24: 311–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389345(1991) ‘On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews’, in D.Boden and D.H.Zimmerman (eds), Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity.and (1979) ‘Formulations as conversational objects’, in G.Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.and ([Page 240]1980) ‘Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: some instances analyzed’, Semiotica, 30: 245–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.30.3-4.245and (1989) ‘Miracles and method’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 9: 321–34.(1974) The Structure of Scientific Inference. London: Macmillan.(1980) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1989) Causal Attribution: From Cognitive Processes to Collective Beliefs. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(Hill, J.H. and Irvine, J.T. (eds) (1992) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1988) ‘Knowledge-based information acquisition: norms and the functions of consensus information’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55: 530–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2060, and (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.and (1993) Language as Ideology,and (2nd edn.London: Routledge.1989) Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science. London: Sage.(1994) ‘Constructing family: descriptive practice and domestic order’, in T.Sarbin and J.I.Kitsuse (eds), Constructing the Social. London: Sage.and (1989) The Politics of Postmodernism. London: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203426050(1992) ‘Charting the logical geography of the concept of “cease fire”’, Human Studies, 15: 265–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00182109(1995) ‘Critique and analysis in media studies: media criticism and practical action’, Discourse and Society, 6: 7–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001002(Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., PinchT. and Petersen, J. (eds) (1995) Handbook of Science, Technology and Society. London: Sage.1984) Categories and the Moral Order. London: Routledge.(1991) ‘Values and moral judgment: communicative praxis as moral order’, in G.Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1985) ‘An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter’, in T.Van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3. London: Academic Press.(1990) ‘List construction as a task and resource’, in G.Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.(1991) Madness and Social Representations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1995) ‘Factual accounting in the discourse on homelessness’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 4: 44–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.1995.tb00264.x(1994) ‘Experiential authority and heterosexuality’, in G.Griffin (ed.), Changing Our Lives: Doing Women's Studies. London: Pluto Press.(1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.(1982a) ‘Relativism – what now?’ Social Studies of Science, 12: 133–6.(1982b) ‘The constructivist programme in the sociology of science: retreats or advances’, Social Studies of Science, 12: 320–4.(1995a) ‘Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science’, in S.Jasanoff, G.Markle, T.Pinch and J.Petersen (eds.), Handbook of Science, Technology and Society. London: Sage.(1995b) ‘Liminal and referent epistemologies: the disunity of two leading sciences’, in P.Galison and D.Stump (eds), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1996) Epistemic Cultures: How Scientists Make Sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1990) ‘Image dissection in natural scientific inquiry’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 15: 259–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500301and (1980) Desire in Language: a Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Oxford: Blackwell.([Page 241]1992) ‘Lookin' cool and talkin' tough’, Journal of Half Remembered but Plausible Research Studies, 2: 72–82.(1986) ‘The camera never lies’, Cilcet Review: the Internationa! Journal for Film and Television Schools, 2: 85–92. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,(2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1977) The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1995) ‘Science as culture: a view from the petri dish’, Social Studies of Science, 25: 285–306.(1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in I.Lakatos and A.Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds) (1970) Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1991) ‘Metaphor and war: the metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf’, Paper circulated on various electronic mailing lists.(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.and (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1986) Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts.and (2nd edn.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.1990) Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1994) Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.(1996) ‘Discourse participation, reported speech and research practices in social psychology’, Theory and Psychology (6: 5–29).and (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1988) ‘Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation’, in P.Drew and A.Wootton (eds), Erving Goffman: Studies in the Interactional Order. Cambridge: Polity.(1985) ‘Discipline and the material form of images: an analysis of scientific visibility’, Social Studies of Science, 15: 37–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631285015001002(1988) ‘The externalized retina: selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences’, Human Studies, 11: 201–34.(1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1994) ‘Representation is overrated: some critical remarks about the use of the concept of representation in science studies’, Configurations: a Journal of Literature, Science and Technology, 2: 137–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/con.1994.0015(1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory of the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Pressand (Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (eds) (1990) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.1984) The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.(1974) ‘Realism and the cinema: notes on some Brechtian theses’, Screen, 15: 7–27.(1985) The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.(1988) ‘Language and the sociology of mind: a critical introduction to the work of Jeff Coulter’, Journal of Pragmatics, 12: 229–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2888%2990037-9(1987) ‘Social representations: a conceptual critique’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17: 471–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1987.tb00109.xand ([Page 242]1993) ‘Discourse analysis and social representations’, in G.Breakwell and D.Cantor (eds) Empirical Approaches to Social Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press., and (1987) ‘Couples sharing stories’, Communication Quarterly, 35: 144–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378709369678(1993) ‘Assigning responsibility in conversational storytelling: the interactional construction of reality’, Text, 13: 247–66.(1993) ‘Jurors' narratives of personal experience in deliberation talk’, Text, 13: 267–90.(1986) ‘Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system’, in J.Clifford and G.E.Marcus (eds), Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1984) ‘The rhetoric of action description’, Informal Logic, 6: 26–9.(1991) ‘Who's a captive? Who's a victim? Response to Collins's methods talk’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 16: 252–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600208, and (1989) Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1965) Hidatsa Syntax. Papers on Formal Linguistics 3. The Hague: Mouton.(1986) ‘The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making’, in S.Fisher and A.D.Todd (eds), Discourse and Institutional Authority. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.(1990) ‘Oracular reasoning in a psychiatric exam: the resolution of conflict in language’, in A.D.Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1970) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-century England. New York: Harper & Row.(1973) The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(Middleton, D. and Edwards, D. (eds) (1990) Collective Remembering. London: Sage.1940) ‘Situated actions and vocabularies of motive’, American Sociological Review, 5: 904–13.(1974) The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.(1985) Sexual/Textual Politics. London: Methuen.(1985) ‘Talking social structure: discourse, domination and the Watergate hearings’, American Sociological Review, 50: 273–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095539and (1984) ‘The phenomenon of social representations’, in R.M.Farr and S.Moscovici (eds), Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1976) ‘Norms and ideology in science’, Social Science Information, 15: 637–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/053901847601500406(1979) Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin.(1980) ‘Interpretation and the use of rules: the case of norms in science’, in T.F. Gieryn (ed.), Science and social structure: Festschrift for Robert Merton. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series III, 39, 111–25.(1981) ‘Action and belief, or scientific discourse: a possible way of ending intellectual vassalage in social studies of science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 163–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100306(1985) The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.(1991) Sociology of Science: a Sociological Pilgrimage. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(1994) ‘Science and family in the great embryo debate’, Sociology, 28: 699–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038594028003004(1981) ‘Putting philosophy to work: Karl Popper's influence on scientific practice’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 389–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100306and (1983) ‘Why an analysis of scientific discourse is needed’, in K.D.Knorr Cetina and M.Mulkay (eds), Science Observed. London: Sage., and (1990) Writing Biology: Texts in the Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.(1976) Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co.(1992) Representing Reality. Indiana: Indiana University Press.([Page 243]1995) Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520792and (1991) Everyday Conversation. London: Sage.(1987) Derrida. London: Fontana.(1988) The Deconstructive Turn: Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosophy. London: Open University Press.(1993) ‘Shocking numbers and graphic accounts: quantified images of drug problems in the print media’, Social Problems, 40: 190–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1993.40.2.03x0325mand (1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge.(1993) ‘Invoking a hostile world: discussing the patient's future in AIDS counselling’, Text, 13: 291–316.(1981) ‘The role of interests in high-energy physics: the choice between charm and colour’, in K.D.Knorr Cetina, R.Krohn and R.D.Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Dordrecht: Reidel.(1984) Constructing Quarks: a Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1992) ‘From science as knowledge to science as practice’, in A.Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1986) Confronting Nature. Dordrecht: Reidel.(1986) ‘The hard sell: patter-merchanting and the strategic (re)production and local management of economic reasoning in the sales routines of market pitchers’, Sociology, 20: 169–91.and (1988) Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.(1987) Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1980) ‘Telling my side: “limited access” as a fishing device’, Sociological Inquiry, 50: 186–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4(1984a) ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes’, in J.M.Atkinson and J.C.Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1984b). ‘Giving a source a basis: the practice in conversation of telling “how I know,”’ Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 607–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2884%2990002-X(1986) ‘Extreme case formulations: a new way of legitimating claims’, Human Studies, 9: 219–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128(1987) ‘Descriptions in legal settings’, in G.Button and J.R.E.Lee (eds), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.(1988/89) ‘Constructing skepticism: four devices used to engender the audience's skepticism’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22: 293–314.(1990/91) ‘Mental concepts in the analysis of social action’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24: 299–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389344(1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.(1970) ‘Normal and science and its dangers’, in I.Lakatos and A.Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1992) ‘Objectivity as standardization: the rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis’, Annals of Scholarship, 9: 19–59.(1984) Testability, flexibility: Kuhnian values in psychologists' discourse concerning theory choice', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14: 303–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318401400302(1988) ‘Cutting cakes: a study of psychologists' social categorizations’, Philosophical Psychology, 1: 17–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572923(1992) ‘Constructing realism: seven moves (plus or minus a couple)’, Theory and Psychology, 2: 167–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354392022004(1996a) ‘Right and wrong footing’, Theory and Psychology, 6: 31–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354396061002(1996b) ‘Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background’, [Page 244]in J.E.Richardson (ed) Handbook of Qualitative Research MethodsLeicester: British Psychological Society.(1990) ‘Nigel Lawson's tent: discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 20: 24–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200504and (1993) ‘A model of discourse in action’, American Behavioral Scientist, 36: 383–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764293036003008, and (1990) ‘Community leaders as a device for warranting versions of crowd events’, Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 725–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2890%2990046-Gand (1987) ‘Discourses of community and conflict: the organization of social categories in accounts of a “riot”’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 26: 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.1987.26.issue-1and (1984) Social Texts and Context: Literature and Social Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul., and (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.and (1988) ‘Accomplishing attitudes: fact and evaluation in racist discourse’, Text, 8: 51–68.and (1991) ‘Quantification rhetoric – cancer on television’, Discourse and Society, 2: 333–65., and (1995) Conversation Analysis: the Study of Talk-in-interaction. London: Sage.(1961) From a Logical Point of View,(2nd edn.Harvard: Harvard University Press.1970) The Web of Belief. New York: Random House.and (1987) ‘Crowd behaviour as collective action’, in , , , and , Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Blackwell.(1990) ‘Speech presentation in the Israel radio news: ideological constraints and rhetorical strategies’, Text, 10: 225–44.and (The interactional organization of social work’, PhD thesis, Loughborough University.(in preparation) ‘1983) ‘The uses and abuses of polls: a social psychologist's view’, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36: 159–61.(1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(1991) Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1989). Governing the Soul. London: Routledge.(1949) The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.(1963) ‘Sociological description’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 8: 1–16; reprinted in J. Coulter (ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990.(1984) ‘On doing being ordinary’, in J.M.Atkinson and J.C.Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1992) Lectures on Conversation. vols. I and II, edited by G.Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(1979) ‘Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction’, in G.Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.and (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’, Language, 50: 696–735. Reprinted in J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press., , and (1993a) ‘Identity politics: challenges to psychology's understanding’, American Psychologist, 48: 1219–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1219(1993b) Celebrating the Other: a Dialogic Account of Human Nature. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1986) ‘The narrative as root metaphor for psychology’, in T.R.Sarbin (ed), Narrative Psychology: the Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger.(1974) Course in General Linguistics. London: Fontana.([Page 245]1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., and (1972) ‘Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place’, in D.Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; reprinted in J. Coulter (ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990.(1988a) ‘Presequences and indirection: applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics, 12: 55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2888%2990019-7(1988b) ‘Description in the social sciences I: talk-in-interaction’, Papers in Pragmatics, 2: 1–24.(1991) ‘Reflections on talk and social structure’, in D.Boden and D.H.Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1992a) ‘Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defence of inter-subjectivity in conversation’, American Journal of Sociology, 97: 1295–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1992.97.issue-5(1992b) ‘On talk and its institutional occasions’, in P.Drew and J.C.Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1995) ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28: 185–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2(1973) ‘Opening up closings’, Semiotica, 7: 289–327; reprinted in R. Turner (ed), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.and (1994) ‘Practices of truth-finding in a court of law: the case of revised stories’, in T.R.Sarbin and J.I.Kitsuse (eds) Constructing the Social. London: Sage.(1968) ‘Accounts’, American Sociological Review, 33: 46–62.and (1969) Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438(1975) ‘The logical status of fictional discourse’, New Literary History, 6: 319–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/468422(1977) ‘Reiterating the differences’, Glyph, 1: 198–208.(1983) The Accountability of Conduct: a Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press.and (1982) ‘History of science and its sociological reconstructions’, History of Science, 20: 157–211.(1985) Leviathan and the Air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.and (1988) The Politics of Representation: Writing Practices in Biography, Photography, and Policy Analysis. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.(1989) ‘Representing world politics: the sport/war intertext’, in J.Der Derian and M.J.Shapiro (eds), International/Intertextual Relations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841(1992) ‘Bakhtin and Billig: Monological versus dialogical practices’, American Behavioral Scientist, 36: 8–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764292036001003(1992) ‘Get outa my face: entitlement and authoritative discourse’, in J.H.Hill and J.T.Irvine (eds), Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1989) ‘Going meta in political confrontations’, in B.Gronbeck (ed.), Spheres of Argument. Annandale, VA: SCA.(1990) ‘Introduction: the rhetoric of inquiry as an intellectual movement’, in H.W.Simons (ed.), The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1988) Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1978) ‘K is mentally ill: the anatomy of a factual account’, Sociology, 12: 23–53.(1983) ‘No one commits suicide: textual analysis of ideological practices’, Human Studies, 6: 309–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02127768(1990) Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge.([Page 246]1991) ‘Mass media and discourse on famine in the Horn of Africa’, Discourse and Society, 2: 223–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002002005(1994) Psychology as Metaphor. London: Sage.(1994) ‘Safety, danger and the movies: women's and men's narratives of aggression’, Feminism and Psychology, 4: 547–70.(Still, A. and Costall, A. (eds) (1991) Against Cognitivism: Alternative Foundations for Cognitive Psychology. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.1990) ‘Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews’. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85: 232–41.and (1967) Passing On. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.(1994) Reservoir Dogs. London: Faber & Faber.(The 2nd of January Group (1986) After Truth: a Post-Modern Manifesto. London: Inventions.1990) Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity.(1985) The Conquest of America: the Question of the Other. New York: Harper & Row.(1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes, the World of High Energy Physics. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Books.(1979) ‘Theory and ideology at work’, in R.Fowler, B.Hodge, G.Kress and T.Trew (eds), Language and Control. London: Routledge.(1978) Making News: a Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.(1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar.(1978) ‘Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation’. Sociology, 12: 105–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106(1983) ‘The presentation of victim and motive in discourse: the case of police interrogations and interviews’, Victimology, 8: 31–52.(1990) ‘Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations’, in G.Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.(1982) ‘Interviews and the interactional construction of accounts of homosexual identity’, Social Analysis, 11: 56–78.and (1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.(1989) ‘Narrative characters and accounting for violence’, in J.Shotter and K.Gergen (eds), Texts of Identity. London: Sage.and (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.and (1987) ‘Unequal egalitarianism: a preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 26: 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00761.x, , and (1990) ‘Describing trouble: practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police’, Language in Society, 19: 465–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014779and (1973) Metahistory: the Historical Imagination in Nineteenth Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.(1978) Tropics of Discourse. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.(Whiteside, A. and Issacharoff, M. (eds) (1987) On Referring in Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.1956) Language. Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, J.B.Carroll (ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1995) The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.and (1974) ‘Telling the code’, in R.Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin; reprinted in J. Coulter (ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990.(1978) Decoding Advertisements. London: Boyars.(1977) Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.(1993) The Unnatural Nature of Science. London: Faber and Faber.(1994) ‘Formulating rape’, Discourse and Society, 5: 125–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005001006and ([Page 247]1981) ‘Stages in the analysis of persuasive messages: the role of causal attributions and message comprehension’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40: 246–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11and (1991). ‘“I was just doing X … when Y”: Some inferential properties of a device in accounts of paranormal experiences’, Text, 11: 267–88.(1992) Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The Organization of Factual Discourse. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1993) ‘Analysing accounts’, in N.Gilbert (ed.), Researching Social Life. London: Sage.(1981) ‘Interests and explanation in the social studies of science’, Social Studies of Science, 11: 365–94.(1983) ‘Irony in the social studies of science.’, in K.D.Knorr Cetina and M.Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.(Woolgar, S. (ed.) (1988a) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Science. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.1988b) Science: the Very Idea. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; London: Tavistock.(1989) ‘The ideology of representation and the role of the agent’, in H.Lawson and L.Appignanesi (eds), Dismantling Truth: Reality in the Post-modern World. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.(1985) ‘Ontological gerry-mandering: the anatomy of social problems explanations’, Social Problems, 32: 214–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1985.32.issue-3and (1990) Intertexuality: Theories and Practices. Manchester: Manchester University Press.and (1984) ‘Blame allocation: sex and gender in a murder interrogation’, Women's Studies International Forum, 7: 75–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2884%2990087-6(1979) ‘Physics and psychics: science, symbolic action and social control in late Victorian England’, in B.Barnes and S.Shapin (eds) Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. London: Sage.(1981) ‘Textual persuasion: the role of social accounting in the construction of scientific arguments’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 409–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100307(1982) ‘The relationship between epistemological and sociological cognitive interests: some ambiguities underlying the use of interest theory in the study of scientific knowledge’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 13: 353–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681%2882%2990019-X(1984) ‘Proofs and reputations: Sir James Hall and the use of classification devices in scientific arguments’, Earth Sciences History, 3: 25–43.(1985) ‘Vocabularies of freedom and resentment: a Strawsonian perspective on the nature of argumentation in science and the law’, Social Studies of Science, 15: 99–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631285015001004(1990) ‘Appeals to valuelessness’, Textual Practice, 4: 38–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502369008582075(1989) ‘“Saying” as collective practice: quoting and differential address in the news’, Text, 9: 369–88.(1971) ‘The everyday world as a phenomenon’, in J.D.Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge. Chicago: Aldine; reprinted in J. Coulter (ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990.and (