Recreating Men: Postmodern Masculinity Politics
Publication Year: 2000
One of the most central issues for women's prospects for equality is whether man can and will change. Changing the social relations of gender will involve changing men’s subjectives as well as their daily practices. This book asks whether this is possible. Bob Pease examines how men, who are supportive of feminism, are responding to the feminist challenge, through an exploration of their experiences and dilemmas in trying to live out their feminist commitment and resist hegemonic forms of masculinity. The book is driven by practical as well as theoretical concerns, and aims to develop strategies that will promote the process of change towards equality in gender relations. Drawing on a critical postmo
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Part I: Theorizing Men and Patriarchy
- Chapter 2: The ‘Man Question’ in Feminism and the New Men's Studies
- Chapter 3: Postmodern Feminism and the Critical Study of Men
Part II: Recreating Masculine Subjectivities
- Chapter 4: Constructing Profeminist Subjectivities
- Chapter 5: Recreating Sonhood
- Chapter 6: Recreating Heterosexualities
Part III: Transforming Masculinity Politics
© Bob Pease 2000
First published 2000
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the Publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
SAGE Publications Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
32, M-Block Market
Greater Kailash – I
New Delhi 110 048
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 0 7619 6205 0
ISBN 0 7619 6206 5 (pbk)
Library of Congress catalog card number available
Typeset by M Rules
Printed in Great Britain by Athenaeum Press, Gateshead
Writing this book has been both an individual and collective effort. Since I began this project I have been supported and encouraged by a number of people. First, I want to express my indebtedness to the participants who devoted their time and energy to sharing their stories, thoughts and feelings throughout the 15 months of the participatory research group. I also want to thank the interlocutors who were prepared to express their support, reservations and criticisms about profeminism for the public record. In particular, I want to acknowledge the conversations with Anthony McMahon about whether it is in men's interests to change.
This book draws on research I completed for my doctoral thesis. I would like to thank Jacques Boulet for his encouragement and support throughout the earlier version of this project. I am indebted to his attention to detail and his commitment to the supervision.
Throughout the course of this research many colleagues and friends have read parts or all of early drafts of my work and have offered thoughtful comments and valuable suggestions. Tricia Moynihan commented helpfully on my beginning attempt to come to terms with postmodernism. Bob Fuller, Wendy Weeks and Yoland Wadsworth read and commented on work-in-progress drafts of the early chapters when my ideas were in their formative stages. Glenda Koutroulis introduced me to the pleasures and pitfalls of memory-work. I thank them all for their support and assistance. I would especially like to thank Silvia Starc, Peter Horsfield, David Tacey, Helen Marshall and Rob Watts for their comments on the full penultimate draft of the thesis manuscript on which this book is based.
In moving from thesis to book, I want to thank my dissertation examiners, Michael Kimmel, John Rowan and Malcolm McCouat. Their enthusiastic response to the thesis, and their belief that this research had value to the general public as well as to academic audiences, encouraged me to take the extra step of moving this work beyond the confines of the academy.
Finally, I want to express my further appreciation to Silvia Starc for her tender support throughout all stages of this project. She, more than anyone, is aware of the blood, sweat and tears involved in the production of this book. Now we can regain the balance that enables these ideas to be more fully lived.[Page viii]
Appendix: Methodology[Page 143]
The nature of my research interests and my commitment to praxis and change suggested a participatory approach to this project. Thus, I invited self-defining profeminist men to participate in a collaborative inquiry group to link the process of personal transformation to the collective politics of change in gender relations.
While it is generally accepted that men cannot do feminist research, they are encouraged to evolve approaches based on feminist standpoint epistemology to research men's lives. Wadsworth and Hargreaves (1993: 5) suggest that the methodological approaches of feminism will be relevant to men who are seeking to transform subordinating practices, whilst Maguire (1987: 71) also encourages men to use participatory research to uncover their own modes of domination of women.
In addition to feminism, my exploration of participatory approaches to research draws upon emancipatory action research. This form of action research requires a group process to enable the development of a learning community to generate a critique of the context in which the group operates (Carr and Kemmis, 1983: 171–2). This learning community is further transformed into a critical community that subjects its own values and practices to scrutiny. Torbert (1991: 232) has defined this process as a ‘practical community of inquiry’, where people are ‘committed to discovering propositions about the world, life, their particular organizations and themselves that they will test in their own actions with others’. Thus, such a group process of action research involves dialogue, discussion, argumentation, critical reflection and theorizing from experience.
Emancipatory action research is at least partly based on a theoretical framework associated with Habermas's (1972) work, in which the participants aim to move from illusory beliefs that may be irrational and contradictory, to a more enlightened understanding of the impact of social structures on their lives. Through the research process, people come to distinguish between what Habermas defines as instrumental and technical knowledge and critical knowledge which derives from the process of reflection and action.
From a postmodern position, Gore (1993: 152–4) has criticized action research for failing to achieve its emancipatory intentions and for reproducing forms of domination because it functions within ‘regimes of truth’. With Lather (1991: 1–2), however, I believe it is possible to reconcile emancipatory discourses and modernist strategies like consciousness-raising with a critical appropriation of important elements of postmodernism. They are not antithetical to each other as some postmodern critics suggest.
[Page 144]Within the participatory approach I have outlined, I chose three research methods to carry out the intentions of this research: consciousness-raising, collective memory-work and sociological intervention. All three methods involve group work, a precondition for participatory research and a preferred methodology for enacting the action component of the research process. Furthermore, the combination of the three methods provided a basis to bridge the gap between the individual and the social and between the subjective and the structural. Together, they avoid the danger of psychologizing masculine subjectivities at the expense of structural change, while at the same time grounding the discussion of political strategies in the subjective realities of men's lives.Consciousness-Raising as Research
Consciousness-raising is a method that reflects both my theoretical analysis and my commitment to activism. It enables participants to explore material about themselves in ways that are searching and insightful and while such a method focuses on the personal, it does not separate the exploration of subjectivity from the wider historical and political issues (Hollway, 1982: 11–13). Consciousness-raising is also a part of my biography and one of the processes through which I became aware of gender domination. As a method, it has a history, both in the contemporary women's movement and in the liberation struggles in Latin America.
Because feminist consciousness was not universal among women, one had to become a feminist (Bartky, 1975: 425–6). Hence, MacKinnon (1982: 535) describes consciousness-raising as the ‘quintessential expression’ of feminism. The metaphor of ‘raising’ comes from the idea of ‘bringing up’ into consciousness experiences that have previously only been known at the unconscious level. It involves ‘becoming aware at a conscious level, of things that we knew but had repressed’ (Eisenstein, 1984: 35). This understanding and analysis are seen as first steps towards social change (Weiler, 1991: 457–8).
Some postmodernists argue that consciousness-raising is a modernist political project based on the ‘meta-narrative’ premise that people can come to recognize ideological and material domination and can struggle collectively towards egalitarian and socially just relations (Gore, 1993: 121–2). However, I argue with Janmohamed (1994) that it can be reconceptualized in postmodern terms. The process of consciousness-raising can encourage people to develop ‘a relationship of non-identity with their own subject positions [which] requires an ejection of the introjected subject positions of dominant groups’ (1994: 244–7). Thus, consciousness-raising becomes a process of assisting people to redefine their subject positions. McLaren and da Silva (1993: 58) also position Freire's work within a postmodernist perspective, whilst Freire (1993: x) himself has recently acknowledged that his understanding of subjectivity, power and experience resemble some forms of postmodernism.
[Page 145]For my purposes, I find it useful to adopt Weedon's (1987: 85) view of consciousness-raising, not as a method to discover one's ‘true nature’ but as ‘a way of changing our subjectivity through positioning ourselves in alternative discourses which we produce together’. Thus, consciousness-raising plays a role in destabilizing identity rather than creating a unified sense of self (Sawicki, 1991: 104), which means it challenges previously held conceptions of the self and creates the possibility for senses of the self to be reconstructed.
In adapting the process of consciousness-raising to work with members of a dominant group, Wineman (1984: 187) used the concept of ‘negative consciousness’ to describe the process by which people become conscious of their oppressor roles and react against them. According to him, ‘equal relations can be experienced as more rewarding than top-down relations’, which constitutes the positive foundation for negative consciousness. When one dehumanizes people, one denies one's own capacity for emotional connectedness. Lichtenberg (1988: 99) similarly argues that, once egalitarian relations are achieved, they can be as attractive to the dominator as they are to the subordinated. It is this recognition that enables the process of consciousness-raising to further the aims of this project.Collective Memory-Work
Memory-work is a method that builds upon, yet goes beyond consciousness-raising. The method was developed by Frigga Haug (1987: 60) to gain greater understanding of the resistance to the dominant ideology at the level of the individual, as well as how women internalize dominant values and how their reactions are colonized by dominant patterns of thought. Haug describes memory-work as a method for the unravelling of gender socialization. Her argument is that it is essential to examine subjective memories if we want to discover anything about how people appropriate objective structures (Haug, 1992: 20).
By sharing and comparing memories from their own lives, Haug and her groups hope to uncover the workings of hegemonic ideology in their subjectivities. Her particular concern is ‘with the ways in which people construct their identities through experiences that become subjectively significant to them’ (1987: 40–52). The premise is that everything we remember is a significant basis for the formation of identity.
By illustrating the ways in which people participate in their own socialization, their potential to intervene in and change the world is expanded. By making conscious the way in which we have previously unconsciously interpreted the world, we are more able to develop resistance against this ‘normality’ (Haug, 1987: 60) and thus develop ways of subverting our own socialization.
Memory-work is carried out by a group of co-researchers who choose a topic or theme to investigate. It involves at least three phases.
First, written memories are produced according to certain rules. [Page 146]Individuals are asked to write a memory of a particular episode, action or event in the third person without any interpretation or explanation. Writing in the third person encourages description and avoids rationalization.
Second, the written memories are collectively analysed. After writing the memories, the co-researchers meet to read and analyse them. All group members express their opinions and ideas about the memories and looks for similarities, differences and cultural imperatives. Memories are compared and contrasted with each other and appraised and reappraised by both the writer and others in the group so that the common elements are identified. Members of the group thus collectively interpret, discuss and theorize the memories. It is through this process that new meanings are created.
Third, memories are reappraised and analysed in the context of a range of theories. This involves rewriting the memories following the collective theorizing (Crawford et al., 1992: 40–51).
Memory-work is an example of what McLaren and da Silva (1993: 73–5) call ‘remembering in a critical mode’; it becomes a form of ‘counter-memory’. The purpose of this critical mode of remembering is ‘not only to understand the past but to understand it differently’. By recounting histories of oppression, suffering and domination, those who occupy positions of dominance can find ways to recognize their privilege and form alliances with the oppressed.
Memory-work has much in common with narrative approaches to research. Pro feminist men's narratives can be read as counter narratives because they reveal that the narrators do not think, feel or act as they are supposed to. In this context, narrative analysis also becomes a form of consciousness-raising that has both ‘therapeutic and transformational possibilities at the individual, familial and societal levels’ (Gorman, 1993: 257).
Memory-work is also consistent with postmodern approaches to research in that it enables us to identify how subjectivities are constituted discursively out of contradictions within discourses (Shotter, 1993: 409). It further emphasizes the partiality of subject positions and the potential for agency that arises out of challenges from alternative subject positionings (Stephensen et al., 1995:2).Sociological Intervention(s) in Masculinity Politics
Alain Touraine's (1977: 142–53) sociological intervention, a participatory research method specifically designed for the study of social movements, involves work with a number of activists organized in groups. The objective is to create a research situation which would, in some way, represent the nature of the struggle the participants are involved in. Thus, the researcher forms groups of individuals who are involved in and identify with a social movement with the aim of engaging in some form of self analysis. The incentive for individuals to become involved in the intervention is an awareness of disharmony between the ideals of the movement and its organizational practices.
[Page 147]Touraine discusses the importance of having different, even opposing, aspects of the struggle represented in the group so that the tensions and conflicts of the movement can be brought out. Interlocutors, who confront the group with alternative analyses, are brought in to prevent the group from centring in on itself. The interlocutors are other participants in the movement, situated at different levels and engaged in different activities from those of the research participants (1977: 159–62).
Confronting the group with both its partners and its opponents brings out the field of their struggle. Through the dialogues, the members of the group have to answer to interpretations that differ from their own and to modify the image they previously had of their opponents. This enables participants to overcome their rationalizations and encourages them to look critically at their own ideologies. The dialogues that take place model the main components of the struggle and after the meeting with the interlocutors, the group reflects upon the encounter and analyses the action. The group works because it has to resolve the tensions between its experience and its ideology and between its own view of the situation and that of the interlocutors (Touraine, 1977: 175).
At the end of the intervention, the researcher is presented with a diversity of arguments, debates and conflicts, out of which he or she must develop a set of hypotheses which will account for these statements and they are put to the test in discussion with the group. The researcher then makes an interpretation of the struggles facing the social movement. Is it a social movement or not? What directions does the movement take? What are its main problems and its most important conflicts and choices? How can its evolution be defined? When the intervention is completed, the participants return to action, where they match the conclusions of the intervention with their new experiences. On the basis of these new experiences, they return to re-examine the issues with their internal problems and increase their capacity for action (Touraine, 1977: 181–205).
These three participatory group research methods of consciousness-raising, collective memory-work and sociological intervention together strengthened the concerns of this project to link the discursively produced subjectivities of the profeminist participants to the prefigurative practices of profeminist action.
Bibliography[Page 148]1992) ‘Will the real men's movement please stand up?’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1990) Community Care and Participatory Research. Montreal: Nu-Age Editions.(1993) ‘Queer versus gay’, Outrage, June: 46–7.(1983) Every Mother's Son: The Role of Mothers in the Making of Men. London: Women's Press.(1995) Taking Sides. Sydney: Random House.(1993) ‘Feminism and objective interests: the role of transformation experiences in rational deliberation’, in L.Alcoff and E.Potter (eds), Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.(1993) ‘Foucauldian feminism: contesting bodies, sexuality and identity’, in C.Ramazanoglu (ed.), Up Against Foucault. London: Routledge.(1980) Women's Oppression Today. London: Verso.(1987) ‘The concept of difference’, Feminist Review, 26 (July): 29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1987.18(1975) ‘Toward a phenomenology of feminist consciousness’, Social Theory and Practice, 3 (4): 425–39.(1990) ‘Male privilege and male violence: patriarchy's root and branch’, in F.Abbott (ed.), Men and Intimacy. Freedom: The Crossing Press.and (Baumli, F. (ed.) (1985) Men Freeing Men: Exploding the Myth of the Traditional Male. Jersey City: New Atlantis.1991) ‘A meditation on men's spirituality’, Changing Men, 23 (Fall/Winter): 30–1.(1992) ‘First loves’, Changing Men, 24 (Summer/Fall): 26–9.(1990) ‘Intrusive images and subjectified bodies: notes on visual heterosexual porn’, in M.Kimmel (ed.), Men Confront Pornography. New York: Crown Publishers.(1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1988) The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.(1981) ‘Talking our way out of it: the rise and fall of a men's group’, in R.Lewis (ed.), Men in Difficult Times: Masculinity Today and Tomorrow. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.(1981) ‘Objective interests and the sociology of power’, Sociology, 15 (2): 161–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003803858101500202(1994) Manhood. Sydney: Finch.(1991) ‘Men unlearning rape’, Changing Men, 22 (Winter/Spring): 22–4.and (1986) ‘Beyond machismo: the new men's movement’, Yoga Journal, November/December: 36–40, 57–8.(1987a) ‘What men really want: interview with Keith Thompson’, in F.Abbott (ed.), New Men, New Minds. Freedom: The Crossing Press.(1987b) The Pillow and the Key: Commentary on the Fairy Tale of Iron John, Part One. St. Paul: Ally Press.([Page 149]1990) Iron John: A Book About Men. New York: Addison Wesley.(1983) The Feminist Challenge. London: Macmillan.(1990) The Three Faces of Power. Newbury Park: Sage.(1982) ‘Now what are they up to?: men in the men's movement’, in S.Friedman and E.Sarah (eds), On the Problem of Men: Two Feminist Conferences. London: The Women's Press.(1987) ‘Envy or with my brains and your looks’, in A.Jardine and P.Smith (eds), Men in Feminism. New York: Methuen.(1991) ‘The political agenda of Republican criminology’. Paper presented at the British Criminological Society Conference, York.(1993) ‘Masculinities, violence and communitarian control’. Paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on Violence, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 15–18 June.and (1993) Straight Male Modern: A Cultural Critique of Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.(1989) ‘Homophobia/misogyny: sexual fears, sexual definitions’, in S.Shepherd and M.Wallis (eds), Coming on Strong: Gay Politics and Culture. London: Unwin Hyman.(1989) Masculinity and Power. Oxford: Blackwell.(1987) ‘The case for men's studies’, in H.Brod (ed.), The Making of Masculinities. Boston: Allen and Unwin.(1988) A Mensch Among Men: Explorations in Jewish Masculinity. Freedom: The Crossing Press.(1994) ‘Some thoughts on some histories of some masculinities: jews and other others’, in H.Brod and M.Kaufman (eds), Theorising Masculinities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.(1989) ‘Identity politics and critical pedagogy’, Educational Theory, 39 (3): 207–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1989.00207.x(1992) ‘Essential lies: a dystopian vision of the mythopoetic men's movement’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1994) Masculinities and Identities. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.(1987) ‘Male heterosexuality: the socialised penis revisited’, in B.Young (ed.), Who's On Top? The Politics of Heterosexuality. Toronto: Garamound Press.(1991) ‘Dialogue across differences: continuing the conversation’, Harvard Educational Review, 61 (4): 393–416.and (1982) The Other Side of Organizing. Cambridge: Schenkman.(1993) Power and Protest: Movements For Change in Australian Society. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.(1989) ‘Responsibility and reproach’, Ethics, 99 (January): 389–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/293071(1985) ‘Postmodernism, poststructuralism and post marxism?’, Theory, Culture and Society, 2 (3): 85–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276485002003008(1990) ‘The new men's studies: part of the problem or part of the solution’, in J.Hearn and D.Morgan (eds), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.and (1992) ‘Healing the mother wound’, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 3 and 4: 65–9.(1992) ‘The men's movement of choice’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1983) Becoming Critical: Knowing Through Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.and (1987) ‘Hard and heavy: towards a new sociology of masculinity’, in M.Kaufman (ed.), Beyond Patriarchy. Toronto: Oxford University Press., and ([Page 150]1978) The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1994) The Making of Anti-sexist Men. London: Routledge.(1990) Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity. Boulder: West View Press.(1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.(1987) Reflecting Men at Twice their Natural Size. London: Andre Deutsch.and (1988) ‘Masculinity, the left and feminism’, in R.Chapman and J.Rutherford (eds), Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London: Lawrence and Wishart.(1991) In the Way of Women. London: Macmillan.(1994) ‘Naming men as men: implications for work, organization and management’, Gender, Work and Organization, 1 (1): 2–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.xand (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1990) ‘A whole new world: remaking masculinity in the context of the environment movement’, Gender and Society, 4 (4): 452–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124390004004003(1991) ‘The big picture – a little sketch: changing western masculinities in the perspective of recent world history’. Paper presented at the Research on Masculinity and Men in Gender Relations Conference, Sydney, 7–8 June.(1992a) ‘A very straight gay: masculinity, homosexual experience and the dynamics of gender’, American Sociological Review, 57 (December): 735–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096120(1992b) ‘Drumming up the wrong tree’, Tikkun, 1 (1): 31–6.(1995) Masculinities. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.(1996) ‘Response’ [to B. Blauner and T. Ditz, reviewers of Masculinities], Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Review, 25 (2): 172–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2077168(1993) ‘A bastard of a life: homosexual desire and practice among men in working-class milieux’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 29 (1): 112–35., and (1991) Absent Fathers, Lost Sons: The Search for Masculine Identity. Boston: Shambhala.(1993) Our Treacherous Hearts. London: Faber & Faber.(1993) ‘So much slime, so little time: the transgression of profeminism’, Changing Men, 25 (Winter/Spring): 18–23.(1992) Emotion and Gender: Constructing Meaning From Memory. London: Sage., , , and (1992) Social Action and Power. Oxford: Blackwell.(1973) ‘For us and against us: anti-chauvinist males and women's liberation’, Social Policy, 4 (3): 32–4.(1975) Gyn/Ecology: The Metaphysics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.(1988) ‘Continuing debate: the truth about domestic violence’, Social Work, 33 (2) (March-April): 189.(1989) Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.(1990) ‘Agency as a form of discursive practice: a classroom scene observed’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11 (3): 341–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142569900110306(1993) Shards of Glass. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.(1994) Poststructuralist Theory and Classroom Practice. Geelong: Deakin University Press.(1990) ‘Positioning: the discursive production of selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20 (1): 43–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.xand (1991) ‘Queer theory: lesbian and gay sexualities’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3 (2): 3–18.([Page 151]1984) Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression. Amhurst: University of Massachusetts Press.(1990) ‘Dilemmas of difference: modernity and postmodernism’, in L.Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.(1976) The Mermaid and the Minotaur. New York: Harper Colophon.(1992) Women, Violence and Social Change. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203450734and (1991) Sexual Dissidence. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198112259.001.0001(1993) ‘Men = violence: a pro feminist perspective on dismantling the masculine equation’. Paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on Violence, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.(1987) ‘Queer fears and gay examples’, The New Internationalist, 175 (September): 10–12.(1991) A Theory of Human Need. London: Macmillan.and (1981) Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women's Press.(1995) Men in Perspective: Practice, Power and Identity. London: Prentice Hall.and (1990) ‘Beyond sex and gender: masculinity, homosexuality and social theory’, in J.Hearn and D.Morgan (eds), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.(1994) Erotics and Politics: Gay Male Sexuality, Masculinity and Feminism. London: Routledge.(1983) The Hearts of Men. New York: Pluto Press.(1984) Contemporary Feminist Thought. London: Unwin.(1979) ‘Developing a theory of capitalist patriarchy and socialist feminism’, in Z.Eisenstein (ed.), Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.(1988) The Female Body and the Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1989) ‘Why doesn't this feel empowering?: working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy’, Harvard Educational Review, 59: 297–324.(1984) ‘Sex-role expectation changes by fathers for their sons’, Sex Roles, 11 (9/10): 861–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287815, and (1987) ‘Gay politics, ethnic identity: the limits of social constructionism’, Socialist Review, 17 (3/4): 9–54.(1990) ‘The problem of gender for women's studies’, Women's Studies International Forum, 13 (5): 457–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2890%2990097-H(1992) Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women. London: Chatto and Windus.(1991) The Wounded Male. New York: Ballantine.(1975) The Liberated Man. New York: Bantam.(1986) Why Men Are The Way They Are. New York: McGraw-Hill.(1993) The Myth of Male Power. New York: Simon and Schuster.(1992) ‘Masculine identity and the politics of essentialism: a social constructionist critique of the men's movement’, Feminism and Psychology, 2 (2): 171–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095935359222004(1993) The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1972) Patriarchal Attitudes. London: Pantheon.(1971) The Dialectic of Sex. London: The Women's Press.(1993) Disputed Subjects. New York: Routledge.(1992) ‘What do men really want?’, in D.Porter (ed.), Between Men and Feminism. London: Routledge.(1983) ‘Postmodernism: a preface’, in H.Foster (ed.), Postmodern Culture. London: Pluto Press.([Page 152]1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.(1978) The History of Sexuality (Volume One): An Introduction. London: Penguin.(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.(1993) White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness. London: Routledge.(1984) Goodbye Tarzan: Men After Feminism. London: Allen and Unwin.(1993) ‘Foreword’, in P.McLaren and P.Leonard (eds), Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter. London: Routledge.(1991) The Spectrum of Responsibility. New York: St Martin's Press.(1981) The Second Stage. London: Abacus.(1994) Sexual Difference: Masculinity and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203313732(1987) Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. New York: Routledge.(1993) ‘Who are we now?’, Outrage, June: 23–6.(1985) In a Man's World. New York: New American Library.(1976) New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.(1977) Studies in Social and Political Theory. London: Hutchinson.(1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Strueturation. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1991) Modernity and Self Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1992) The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1982) ‘Men's groups: their radical possibilities’, Gay Information, 9/10: 35–9.(1990) Curriculum Discourse as Postmodernist Practice. Geelong: Deakin University Press.(1989) ‘Postmodernism: roots and polities’, Dissent, 36 (Winter): 100–8.(1976) The Hazards of Being Male: Surviving the Myth of Male Privilege. New York: Signet.(1987) The Inner Male. New York: Signet.(1991) Psychological and Psychiatric Problems in Men. London: Routledge.(1987) ‘Changing men who batter: a developmental model for integrated interventions’, Journal of Family Violence, 2 (4): 335–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993299(1982) ‘Why men resist’, in B.Thorpe and M.Yalan (eds), Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions. New York: Longman.(1983) No Turning Back: Lesbian and Gay Liberation for the 80's. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers., , and (1994) Men, Women and Household Work. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.and (1993) ‘Why is this men's movement so white?’, Changing Men, 26 (Summer/Fall): 15–17.(1993) The Struggle for Pedagogies. New York: Routledge.(1993) ‘Postmodernism and the conduct of inquiry in social work’, Affilia, 8 (3): 247–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088610999300800302(1993) Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.(1994) ‘Recovering From Whiplash: On Ending the Gender War’. Unpublished Manuscript, Melbourne.(1981) Pornography and Silence. London: The Women's Press.(1992) ‘Women and power: definition, dualism and difference’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16: 389–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00264.x(1991) ‘Male female relations and the dialogical imperative’, in L.Grob, R.Hassan and H.Gordon (eds), Women's and Men's Testimonies of Spirit. New York: Greenwood Press.([Page 153]1994) Mothers, Lovers and Sons. Boston: Shambhala.(1994) ‘Postmodernism and the interrogation of masculinity’, in H.Brod and M.Kaufman (eds), Theorizing Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627(1972) Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston: Beacon Press.(1992) ‘Introduction’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1994) ‘Partnership accountability’, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 2 and 3: 6–29.(1987) ‘Minimal selves’, inICA Documents, no. 6, London.(1977) Fathers' Influences on Children. Chicago: Nelson Hall.(1990) ‘Men, power and the exploitation of women’, in J.Hearn and D.Morgan (eds), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.(1988) ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives’, Feminist Studies, 14 (3): 575–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3178066(1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.(1987) ‘Is there a feminist method?’, in S.Harding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.(1992) ‘Subjectivity, experience and knowledge: an epistemology from/for rainbow coalition polities’, Development and Change, 23 (3): 175–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00461.x(1993) ‘Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is strong objectivity?’, in L.Alcoff and E.Potter (eds), Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.(1981) ‘The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: towards a more progressive union’, in L.Sargent (ed.), Women and Revolution. Boston: South End Press.(1990) ‘Foucault on power: a theory for women?’, in L.Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.(1987) Female Sexualisation: A Collective Work of Memory. London: Verso.(1992) Beyond Female Masochism: Memory-Work and Politics. London: Verso.(1987) The Gender of Oppression: Men Masculinity and the Critique of Marxism. Sussex: Wheatsheaf.(1992) Men in the Public Eye. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203310748(1994) ‘Theorizing unities and differences between men and between masculinities’, in H.Brod and M.Kaufman (eds), Theorizing Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627and (1990) Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1977) ‘Emotions and the left’, Issues in Radical Therapy, 18 (Spring) 10–12.(1994) ‘Loosen the homophobic grip’, Changing Men, 27 (Winter): 14–16.(1984) ‘Constructing the subject’, in J.Henriques, W.Hollway, C.Urwin, C.Venn and V.Walkerdine (eds), Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London: Methuen., , , and (1987) ‘On heterosexual masculinity: some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality’, in M.Kimmel (ed.), Changing Men. Newbury Park: Sage.(1990) ‘The context of anti-gay violence: notes on cultural and psychological heterosexism’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5 (3): 316–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088626090005003006(1971) Boys in Fatherless Families. Washington DC: US Department of Health Education Service.and (1992) Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method For Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(1987) Women and Love. London: Penguin.([Page 154]1994) The Hite Report on the Family: Growing up Under Patriarchy. London: Bloomsbury.(1982) ‘Identity and gender difference in adult social relations’. PhD dissertation, University of London.(1989) Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science. London: Sage.(1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Centre. Boston: South End Press.(hooks, b. (1989) Talking Back: Thinking Feminist Thinking Black. Boston: Sheba.hooks, b. (1991) ‘Essentialism and experience’, American Literary History, 3 (1): 172–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alh/3.1.1721992) Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End Press.(1993) ‘Let's get real about feminism: the backlash, the myths, the movement’, Ms, 4 (2): 34–43.(1977) ‘Anti-sexist men's consciousness-raising groups’, in J.Snodgrass (ed.), For Men Against Sexism. New York: Times Change Press.(1987) ‘Male sexuality: towards a theory of liberation’, in M.Kaufman (ed.), Beyond Patriarchy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.and (1991) The Presence of the Past: Male Violence in the Family. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.(1994) ‘The church, forgiveness and reconciliation’, in S.Bartley and H.Macdonald (eds), Sexual Assault and other Forms of Violence within the Australian Community. National Resource and Training Seminar, CASA House, Melbourne.(1987) ‘Choosing with care: working with non-gay men’, in G.Hanscombe and M.Humphreys (eds), Heterosexuality. London: G.M.P. Publications.(Humphries, M. and Metcalf, A. (eds) (1985) The Sexuality of Men. London: Pluto Press.1995) Community Development: Creating Community Alternatives – Vision, Analysis and Practice. Melbourne: Longman.(1994) ‘Practice and the postmodern’. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Social Work Education Conference, Perth.(1984) Men: The Male Myth Exposed. London: Century Publishing.(1985) ‘Sexuality, welfare and political practice’. Social work monograph, University of East Anglia, Norwich.(1981) ‘Dancing along the precipice: the men's movement in the ‘80's’, Radical America, 15 (5): 53–71.(1990) Unmasking Masculinity: A Critical Biography. London: Unwin Hyman.(1994) ‘Some implications of Paulo Freire's border pedagogy’, in H.Giroux and P.McLaren (eds), Between Borders: Pedagogy and the Politics of Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.(1987) ‘Men in feminism: odor di vomo or compagnons de route?’, in A.Jardine and P.Smith (eds), Men in Feminism. New York: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203361900(1990) Anticlimax: A Feminist Perspective on the Sexual Revolution. London: The Women's Press.(1988) ‘On the concept of interest, women's interests and the limitations of interest theory’, in K.Jones and A.Jonasdottir (eds), The Political Interests of Gender. London: Sage.(1993) Why Men Hate Women. London: Free Association Books.(1993) Heterosexism: An Ethical Challenge. Albany: State University of New York Press.and (1987) ‘The construction of masculinity and the triad of men's violence’, in M.Kaufman (ed.), Beyond Patriarchy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.(1993) Cracking The Armour: Power, Pain and the Lives of Men. Toronto: Viking.([Page 155]1994) ‘Men, feminism, and men's contradictory experience of power’, in H.Brod and M.Kaufman (eds), Theorizing Masculinities. New York: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627(1992) A Circle of Men. New York: St Martin's Press.(1991) Fire in the Belly: On Being a Man. New York: Bantam Books.(1992) ‘Rapacious normality: the war between the sexes’, in C.Harding (ed.), Wingspan: Inside the Men's Movement. New York: St Martin's Press.(1989) Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.(1990) ‘Journeying in reverse: possibilities and problems in feminist research on sexual violence’, in L.Gelsthorpe and A.Morris (eds), Feminist Perspectives in Criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(1994) ‘Researching women's lives or studying women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research’, in M.Maynard and J.Purvis (eds), Researching Women's Lives From a Feminist Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis., and (1987) ‘Men's response to feminism at the turn of the century’, Gender and Society, 3 (3) (September): 261–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124387001003003(1990) ‘After 15 years: the impact of the sociology of masculinity on the masculinity of sociology’, in J.Hearn and D.Morgan (eds), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Routledge.(1992) ‘Reading men: men, masculinity and publishing’, Men's Studies Review, 9(1): 45–50.(1993) ‘The politics of accountability’, Changing Men, 26 (Summer/Fall): 3–4.(1994) ‘Masculinity as homophobia: fear, shame and silence in the construction of masculinity’, in H.Brod and M.Kaufman (eds), Theorizing Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627(1989) ‘Introduction’, in M.Kimmel and M.Messner (eds), Men's Lives. New York: Macmillan.and (1992) ‘The men's movement’, Arena, 99/100: 129–40.(1987) ‘Men loving men: the challenge of gay liberation’, in M.Kaufman (ed.), Beyond Patriarchy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.(1989) After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 1990's. New York: Doubleday.and (1987) The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.(1992) Men's Work. New York: Ballantine Books.(1983) ‘The “men-problem” in women's studies: the expert, the ignoramus and the poor dear’, Women's Studies International Forum, 6 (4): 413–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2883%2990034-1(1991) ‘Interview’, Achilles Heel, 12: 6.(1992) ‘Giving up sexism’, inThe Liberation of Men. Seattle: Rational Island Publishers.(1981) ‘Women's time’, Signs, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/493855(1993) Revisioning Men's Lives: Gender, Intimacy and Power. New York: The Guilford Press.(1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/In the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.(1991) ‘Positively experienced man/boy sex: the discourse of seduction and the social construction of masculinity’. Paper presented at the Research on Masculinity and Men in Gender Relations Conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.(1991) At my Father's Wedding: Reclaiming our True Masculinity. New York: Bantam.(1982) ‘Male feminists and divided women’, in S.Friedman and E.Sarah (eds), On the Problem of Men: Two Feminist Conferences. London: The Women's Press.(1988) Getting Equal: The Equalizing Law of Relationship. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.([Page 156]1991) ‘Sexual aggression, masculinity and fathers’, Signs: Journal of Women, Culture and Society, 16 (2): 239–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494659(1993) ‘The (f)utility of a feminist turn to Foucault’, Economy and Society, 22 (4): 437–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149300000028(1984) Sister Outsider. New York: The Crossing Press.(1993) ‘Dreams and dilemmas: feminist musings on the “man question”’, in T.Haddad (ed.), Men and Masculinities: A Critical Anthology. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.(1992) No More Sex War: The Failures of Feminism. London: Sinclair-Stevenson.(1982) ‘Feminism, marxism, method and the state: an agenda for theory’, Signs: Journal of Women, Culture and Society, 7 (3): 515–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/493898(1987) Doing Participatory Research. Amherst: Centre for International Education, University of Massachusetts.(1988) ‘Australian women and feminist men’, Hecate, 14 (2): 98–105.(1972) A Male Guide to Women's Liberation. New York: Avon.(1994) Engendering Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1980) ‘The woman within’, Magus, 4: 26–34.(1993) ‘Decentering pedagogy: critical literacy, resistance and the politics of memory’, in P.McLaren and P.Leonard (eds), Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203420263and (1994) ‘Taking care of men: discourses and practices of domestic life’. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne.(1992) Men, Sex and Other Secrets. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.(1988) ‘The truth about domestic violence revisited: a reply to Saunders’, Social Work, 33 (2): 184–8.and (1987) ‘Patriarchy and male psychology’. Unpublished manuscript, Montreal.(1965) The Colonizer and the Colonized. Boston: Beacon Press.(Men Against Pornography (1992) ‘A New Principle of Accountability’. Unpublished manuscript, New York.Mentor Men's Network (1993) Connectedness brochure, Melbourne.1982) Sociological Theory in Use. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1988) ‘Race, sexual politics and black masculinity: a dossier’, in R.Chapman and J.Rutherford (eds), Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London: Lawrence and Wishart.and (1989) ‘Socialism, feminism and men’, Radical Philosophy, 53: 8–19.(1992) ‘Father hunger: why soup kitchen fathers are not good enough’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1972) Sexual Politics. London: Abacus.(1975) Psychoanalysis and Feminism. New York: Vintage Books.(1985) Sexuall Textual Politics. New York: Routledge.(1989) ‘Men against patriarchy’, in L.Kauffman (ed.), Gender and Theory: Dialogues on Feminist Criticism. Oxford: Blackwell.(1990) King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine. San Francisco: Harper.and (1992) Discovering Men. London: Routledge.(1992) ‘Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic polities’, in J.Butler and J.Scott (eds), Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.(1996) ‘Man bad, woman good? essentialisms and ecofeminisms’, New Left Review, 216: 79–93.(1990) ‘Introduction’, in L.Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.([Page 157]1987) ‘Misogyny: gay and straight’, in F.Abbott (ed.), New Men, New Minds. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.(1992) ‘A helping hand from the guys’, in L.Hagan (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1992) ‘How men grow up: sources of tradition and change’. Paper presented at the 17th National Conference on Men and Masculinity, Chicago.(1981) The Politics of Reproduction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1985) Understanding Jung, Understanding Yourself. Sydney: Methuen.(1993) The Inner Man: Men, Myths and Dreams. Sydney: Sun Books.(1993) ‘Power between women’. Unpublished manuscript, Macquarie University, Sydney.(1991) ‘Abuse, violence, counselling’, XY: Men, Sex and Politics, 1 (3): 9–11.(1993) ‘What about the workers?’, XY: Men, Sex and Politics, 3 (3): 22–4.(1986) Finding Our Fathers. New York: Fawcett Columbine.(1992) Wrestling With Love. New York: Fawcett Columbine.(1987) ‘Outlaws: gay men in feminism’, in A.Jardine and P.Smith (eds), Men in Feminism. London: Methuen.(1987) ‘The tables are turning’, in G.Hanscomb and M.Humphries (eds), Heterosexuality. London: GMP Publications.(1990) ‘Black feminism: the politics of difference’, in J.Rutherford (ed.), Identity, Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart.(1992) Awakening From the Deep Sleep. San Francisco: Harper.(1990) ‘Helping men understand themselves’, in R.Meth and R.Pasick (eds), Men In Therapy. New York: Guilford Press., and (1984) ‘Male sexual politics and men's gender practice’, Women's Studies International Forum, 7 (1): 24–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2884%2990080-3(1997) Men and Sexual Politics: Towards a Profeminist Practice. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.(People's Equality Network (1994) Newsletter, 1 (1), Melbourne.1989) Identity Politics: Lesbian Feminism and the Limits of Community. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.(1991) ‘Specificity: beyond equality and difference’, Differences, 3 (1): 63–84.(1986) ‘Alliances between women: overcoming internalized oppression and internalized domination’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12 (1): 146–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494302(1993) Democracy and Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1983) The Myth of Masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1987) ‘American fathering in historical perspective’, in M.Kimmel (ed.), Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity. Newbury Park: Sage.(1988) ‘Feminism and deconstruction’, Feminist Studies, 14 (1): 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3177998(1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.and (1985) ‘Spinning among the fields: Jung, Frye, Levi-Strauss and feminist archetypal theory’, in E.Laute and C.Rupprecht (eds), Feminist Archetypal Theory. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.(1989) Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression. London: Routledge.(1993) ‘Introduction’, in C.Ramazanoglu (ed.), Up Against Foucault. London: Routledge.(1993) ‘Women's sexuality and men's appropriation of desire’, in C.Ramazanoglu (ed.), Up Against Foucault. London: Routledge.and (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.([Page 158]1983) ‘Anti-porn: soft issue-hard world’, Feminist Review, 13 (Spring): 65–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1983.7(1988) Am I That Name? Feminism and the Creation of ‘Women’ in History. London: Macmillan.(1989) ‘Challenging heterosexism in social work education’, in D.James and T.Vinson (eds), Advances in Social Work Education. Sydney: Sydney University.(1992) Mad About Women. London: Virago Press.(1987) ‘No question of silence’, in A.Jardine and P.Smith (eds), Men in Feminism. New York: Methuen.(1992) ‘Wild men and misogyny: defending the horned god’, Man: Men, Relationships, Community, 18 (Summer): 36–7.(1981) ‘The trouble with patriarchy’, in R.Samuel (ed.), People's History and Socialist Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1992) ‘Patriarchy and the men's movement: part of the problem or part of the solution’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1992) Men's Silences: Predicaments in Masculinity. London: Macmillan.(1976) Blaming the Victim. New York: Pantheon Books.(1992) ‘Masculinity as signs: poststructural, feminist approaches to the study of gender’, in S.Craig (ed.), Men, Masculinity and the Media. Newbury Park: Sage.(1993) The Political Psyche. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203359594(1992) An Introductory Guide to Poststructuralism and Postmodernism. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1988) ‘Other truths about domestic violence: a reply to McNeely and Robinson-Simpson’, Social Work, 33 (2): 179–83.(1988) ‘Identity politics and sexual freedom: Foucault and feminism’, in I.Diamond and L.Quinby (eds), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on Resistance. Boston: North Eastern University Press.(1991) Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body. New York: Routledge.(1974) ‘On male liberation’, in J.Pleck and J.Sawyer (eds), Men and Masculinity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.(1977) ‘Dangers with men's consciousness-raising groups’, in J.Snodgrass (ed.), For Men Against Sexism. New York: Times Change Press.(1993) ‘Why mythopoetic men don't flock to NOMAS’, Masculinities, 1 (3/4): 68–72.(1988) ‘Deconstructing equality versus difference: or the use of poststructuralist theory for feminism’, Feminist Studies, 14 (1): 33–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3177997(1982) ‘Sexual assumptions in the women's movement’, in S.Friedman and E.Sarah (eds), On the Problem of Men: Two Feminist Conferences. London: The Women's Press.(1985) Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.(1987) Is the Future Female?: Troubled Thoughts on Contemporary Feminism. London: Virago.(1989) ‘Slow change or no change? socialism and the problem of men’, Feminist Review, 31 (Spring): 5–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1989.3(1990) Slow Motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men. London: Virago.(1993) ‘Changing men: masculinities in context’, Theory and Society, 22 (5): 628–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993539(1994) Straight Sex: The Politics of Pleasure. London: Virago.([Page 159]1989) Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality. London: Routledge.(1991a) Recreating Sexual Politics: Men, Feminism and Politics. London: Routledge.(1991b) ‘Men, sexual politics and socialism’, in V.Seidler (ed.), The Achilles Heel Reader: Men, Sexual Politics and Socialism. London: Routledge.(1991c) ‘Preface’, in V.Seidler (ed.), The Achilles Heel Reader Men, Sexual Politics and Socialism. London: Routledge.(1992) ‘Men, sex and relationships’, in V.Seidler (ed.), Men, Sex and Relationships: Writings from Achilles Heel. London: Routledge.(1994) Unreasonable Men: Masculinity and Social Theory. London: Routledge.(1992) Embattled Eros: Sexual Politics and Ethics in Contemporary America. New York: Routledge.(1993) Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open University Press.(1991) Towards a New Sociology of Social Work. Aldershot, Hants.: Avebury.(1994) ‘A note from the author's son’, in O.Silverstein and B.Rashbaum (eds), The Courage to Raise Good Men. New York: Viking.(1994) The Courage to Raise Good Men. New York: Viking.and (1992) ‘Postmodernism, urban ethnography and the new social space of ethnic identity’, Theory and Society, 21 (4): 493–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993487(1987) ‘Men in feminism: men and feminist theory’, in A.Jardine and P.Smith (eds), Men in Feminism. New York: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203361900(1977) ‘Men's liberation (criticisms)’, in J.Snodgrass (ed.), For Men Against Sexism. New York: Times Change Press.(1993) ‘Position envy and the subsumption of feminism’, Arena Magazine, 4, (April/May): 34–6.(1990) ‘Feminism, humanism and postmodernism’, Radical Philosophy, 55 (Summer): 11–17.(1993) ‘Productive contradictions’, in C.Ramazanoglu (ed.), Up Against Foucault. London: Routledge.(1988) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. London: The Women's Press.(1987) In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Reston: Reston Publishing Company.(1982) ‘“Male needs”: the problems and problems of working with gay men’, in S.Friedman and E.Sarah (eds), On the Problem of Men: Two Feminist Conferences. London: The Women's Press.(1989) ‘Masculinity and race: the dual dilemma of black men’, in M.Kimmel and M.Messner (eds), Men's Lives. New York: Macmillan.(1992) ‘A men's movement I can trust’, in K.Hagen (ed.), Women Respond to the Men's Movement. San Francisco: Harper.(1975) ‘Introduction’, in M.Fasteau, The Male Machine. New York: Dell.(1986) When a Man Loves a Woman: Sexual and Emotional Literacy for the Modern Man. New York: Grove Press.(1995) ‘You and me and she: memory-work and the construction of self’. Unpublished manuscript, Macquarie University, Sydney., and (1989) ‘Eroticism and violence in the father-son relationship’, in J.Stoltenberg (ed.), Refusing to be a Man. New York: Meridian.(1991) ‘A coupla things I've been meaning to say about really confronting male power’, Changing Men, 22 (Winter/Spring): 8–10.([Page 160]1992) Sex and Selfhood: A Facilitator's Guidebook. Minneapolis: Kundschier/Manthey.(1993) The End of Manhood: A Book for Men of Conscience. New York: Dutton.(1994) ‘The myth of the battered husband syndrome’, Masculinities, 2 (4): 79–82.(1990) Physical Violence in American Families. New Brunswick: Transaction.and (1993) ‘Feminist standpoint theory and the questions of social work research’, Affilia, 8 (2): 171–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088610999300800203(1990) ‘Reconstructing masculinity: a post-Jungian response to contemporary men's issues’, Meanjin, 49 (4): 781–92.(1986) ‘Beyond the bravado: sex roles and the exploitative male’, Social Work, 31 (1): 12–17.(1990) ‘Masculinity, identification and political culture’, in J.Hearn and D.Morgan (eds), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.(1993) Not Guilty: Men: The Case for the Defence. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.(1991) ‘Can white heterosexual men understand oppression?’, Changing Men, 22 (Winter/Spring): 14–16.(1992) ‘On being heterosexual in a homophobic world’, in W.Blumenfeld (ed.), Homophobia. Boston: Beacon Press.(Thompson, E. (ed.) (1994) Older Men's Lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/97814522434741992) Ending the Silence: The Origins and Treatment of Male Violence Against Women. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.(1990) ‘M. Foucault: towards an archaeology of archaeology’, in C.Tilley (ed.), Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics, Post Structuralism. Oxford: Blackwell.(1991) The Power of Balance: Transforming Self Society, and Scientific Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.(1977) The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1985) ‘An introduction to the study of social movements’, Social Research, 52 (4): 749–87.(1987) The Worker's Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., and (1994) Real Men. Sydney: Harper and Collins.(1993) Hot Iron: A Spiritual Critique of Bly's Iron John. Wheaton, IL: Quest Books.(1990) ‘(In)visible alliances: conflicting “chronicles” of feminism’, in J.Boone and M.Cadden (eds), Engendering Men: The Question of Male Feminist Criticism. New York: Routledge.(1993) What is Feminist Research?Melbourne: Action Research Issues Association.and (1990) Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(1988) He and She: Men in the Eighties. London: Routledge.(1992) ‘“Women's interests” and the post structuralist state’, in M.Barrett and A.Phillips (eds), Destabilizing Feminist Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Cambridge: Polity Press.and (1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.(1990) ‘The value of difference’, in J.Rutherford (ed.), Identity, Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart.(1993) ‘Rediscovering values’, in J.Squires (ed.), Principled Positions: Postmodernism and the Rediscovery of Value. London: Lawrence and Wishart.([Page 161]1991) ‘Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference’, Harvard Educational Review, 61 (4): 449–74.(1987) Jung and Feminism: Liberating Archetypes. Boston: Beacon Press.(1990) ‘Oppression and victimization: choices and responsibility’, Hypatia, 5(3): 15–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00604.x(1995) Re-Authoring Lives: Interviews and Essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.(1983) What is to be done about Violence Against Women?London: Penguin.(1990) Single Fathers. Melbourne: Sun Books.(1984) The Politics of Human Services. Boston: South End Press.(1980) ‘Male dominance, late capitalism and the growth of instrumental reason’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 24–5: 249–80.and (1993) Fire with Fire: The New Female Power and How it will Change the 21st Century. London: Chatto and Windus.(1990) ‘On the theory and practice of power’, in J.Arac (ed.), After Foucault: Humanistic Knowledge and Postmodern Challenges. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.(1977) ‘Racism, sexism and class elitism: change agent dilemmas in combating oppression’, in A.Sargent (ed.), Beyond Sex Roles. San Francisco: West Publishing Company., and (1994) Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. New York: Routledge.(1992) ‘Toward a feminist understanding of women and power’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16: 381–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00263.xand (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(