Introduction Next Chapter

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size


The general tenor of the arguments in this book is that radical feminism is not one form of feminism among others, but simply feminism ‘unmodified’ (MacKinnon, 1987: 16), and that the common practice of qualifying feminism with any of a variety of pre-existing frameworks serves to disguise the core meaning of feminism. In the 1970s, those frameworks tended to be summed up under the headings ‘liberal feminism’, ‘socialist feminism’ and ‘radical feminism’; subsequently, they have multiplied into a plethora of ‘feminisms’ which defy enumeration. But such a characterization disguises the relations of power involved. What has been happening is not a struggle over the meaning of feminism between equally matched contenders, but a stream of attacks powered by allegiances to varieties of malestream thought, ...

Looks like you do not have access to this content.


Don’t know how to login?

Click here for free trial login.

Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website