Policy Transfer and Educational Change

Books

David Scott, Mayumi Terano, Roger Slee, Chris Husbands & Raphael Wilkins

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Copyright

    Preface

    This important and, I hope, influential book is about how ideas travel within countries and round the world. The principal theme is reforming school systems, and in the book we examine how efforts in India to achieve this were generally unsuccessful. In particular, we concentrate on the means to achieve this, i.e. the use of a policy-borrowing model, whereby exemplary practices developed in countries round the world are transferred to a recipient country, such as India, our case study. In the end we suggest that this policy-borrowing model is both flawed conceptually and in addition, failed in practice. We have therefore suggested a different model, which we have called a policy-learning model, that is, identifying a set of practices which are considered to be successful in one national setting and then transposing them to another national setting, in which a problem or need has been identified. In order to solve this problem or meet this need, policy-makers and practitioners learn from practices developed in other countries. The focus and the underlying methodology are not arbitrarily chosen from an infinite assortment of possible focuses and methodologies. Their use therefore has to be justified; a task that we undertake in this book.

    Our purpose then, is to develop and articulate a comparative methodology which allows us to understand how educational ideas travel and subsequently influence classroom practices. What this means is that a binding, sufficient and salient reason (or reasons) has to be provided as to why our theory of policy learning is better than other theories focusing on the same area of social life. A number of arguments have been put forward as to whether it is possible to show that Theory1 is better than Theory2, and indeed whether this in principle can be achieved.

    The first of these is that there are real issues which impact on our lives and it is these real issues that determine the truthfulness of particular theories. This is an argument in support of ontological realism but it doesn’t take us very far in establishing whether it is possible to determine that one theory is better than another. However, what it does do is indicate that one of our criteria for this determination is related to the referent of knowledge (indeed that knowledge does have a referent). This is an important step in the argument for judgemental rationality (our ability to decide that one theory is better than another when they are both focused on the same area of social life), but it is not sufficient in itself to establish categorically that it is possible.

    A second argument is that inevitably we do make judgements and we need to make them wisely. This is a curious argument and it suggests, in a tentative fashion, a foundational move. However, this argument is simply another way of asserting that it is possible to make these judgements. It doesn’t provide us with the means to make such judgements. Another attempt is to suggest that the categories we use in the world are open to change. This is simply a reiteration of the central claim that our knowledge–development activity is located in specific geo-social-historical locations.

    The most promising argument in favour of judgemental rationality is that once it has been established that ontological realism is a truthful claim, then what follows from this is that there is a relation/connection between knowledge development and the world (not of course in a correspondence or representational sense). This means that it then becomes possible to produce knowledge of this connection/relation and of the world itself, even if it is indirect. If in relation to the comparative methodology that we have chosen and judged to be superior to other comparative methodologies, we can show how it works, then we can begin the work of grounding our theories in the world as it is and thus establishing in part the possibility of claiming that T1 is better than T2.

    Another argument is that if one theory can explain more significant phenomena than another, then it is a superior theory. However, this seemingly persuasive argument needs to be clarified. What exactly does it mean? Clearly if there are anomalies, contradictions or inadequacies in T1, then it becomes possible for us to argue that this theory is inadequate or insufficient. So in trying to determine whether it is possible to establish that T1 is superior to T2 then we also (in addition to our epistemic criterion) have to build in a notion of rational adequacy. However, I don’t think that there is a problem in using these two criteria together in any judgement we might want to make between T1 and T2.

    A fifth argument that would allow us to make a judgement between two different theories about the same object of investigation is that if one accepts that experiments can provide knowledge, then logically it becomes possible to accept ontological realism. I think that this is a strong claim; however, it is not a sufficient argument for establishing that T1 is superior to T2.

    A further argument refers to Jurgen Habermas’ notion of communicative competence. The argument would then be that T1 is superior to T2 because in its production it better conforms to the rules for communicative competence. That is, any claim to theoretical credibility must be able to make the following assertions: this work is intelligible and hence meaningful in the light of the structuring principles of its discourse community; what is being asserted propositionally is true; what is being explained can be justified; and the person who is making these claims is sincere about what they are asserting. These four conditions if they are fulfilled allow a theorist to say something meaningful about the world. However, since we are trying to establish whether it is possible to determine that T1 is superior to T2, then we cannot use the argument that T1 is superior on the grounds that the supporter of T1 is coming from a better or purer position than the supporter of T2, because this assumes that the argument being made is necessarily right.

    It is suggested that another way of determining whether T1 is superior to T2 is to make the claim that T1 is more powerful and has more powerful effects than other theories, for example, T2, T3, through to Tn. Self-evidently, some interpretations are more powerful or have more powerful effects in the world than others; however, this cannot provide us with an argument that might suggest that it is possible to say that T1 is a better theory qua its theoretical adequacy than T2.

    What are we left with? There are four ways of distinguishing between different theories or models. The first is epistemic: a theory is superior to another because it is more empirically adequate. The second is the converse, so that a version of reality is superior to another because it contains fewer contradictions, disjunctions and aporias. A third approach focuses on the giving of reasons, and concludes that some reasons and systems of rationality are superior to others, and therefore should be preferred. A fourth approach is pragmatic: a theory is better than another because it is more practically adequate or referenced to/part of extant frameworks of meaning. A combination of all four reasons is appropriate. What we have attempted to do then in this book is provide a reason or set of reasons as to why our comparative methodology is superior to other methodologies that have been developed by other people.

    David ScottSeptember 2015

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Charles Posner, Chris Martin and Elsa Gusman to pages 1–4 of this book.

  • References

    Ainscow, M. (2015) Struggles for Equity in Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S. and West, M. (2012) Developing Equitable Education Systems. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Alexander, W. (1954) Education in England: The National System, How it Works. London: Newnes.
    Allan, J. (2008) Rethinking Inclusive Education: The Philosophers of Difference in Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) (2015) ASER 2014: Annual Status of Education Report. Delhi: Pratham.
    Aristotle (1925) Nicomachaen Ethics (Ethica Nicomachea), trans. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Aspin, D. (1996) ‘The liberal paradox’, in J. Chapman, W. Boyd, R. Lander and D. Reynolds (eds), The Reconstruction of Education: Quality, Equality and Control. London: Cassell.
    Aubrey, B. and Cohen, P. (1995) Working Wisdom: Timeless Skills and Vanguard Strategies for Learning Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Ball, S. (1990) Politics and Policy Making in Education: Explorations in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.
    Ball, S. (1994) Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Ball, S. (2007) Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education. London: Routledge.
    Ball, S. (2008) The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
    Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
    Barber, M. with Moffit, A. and Kihn, P. (2011) Deliverology 101: A Field Guide for Education Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2005) The Social Model of Disability: Europe and the Majority World. Leeds: The Online Disability Press.
    Barton, L. (2005) Special Educational Needs: An Alternative Look. A Response to Warnock. Available at: www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/barton/Warnock.pdf.
    Bauman, Z. (2004) Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts. Oxford: Polity.
    Bhaskar, R. and Danermark, B. (2006) ‘Meta-theory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(4): 27897.
    Bishop, R., O’Sullivan, D. and Berryman, M. (2010) Scaling up Education Reform: Addressing the Politics of Disparity. Wellington: NZCER Press.
    Black, P.J. (1998) Testing: Friend or Foe?: Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. London: Falmer.
    Black, P.J. and Wiliam, D. (2009) ‘Developing the theory of formative assessment’, Education Assessment, Evaluation and Access, 21: 531.
    Black-Hawkins, K., Florian, L. and Rouse, M. (2007) Achievement and Inclusion in Schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Booth, T. and Ainscow, M. (2011) The Index for Inclusion. Bristol: Centre for Studies in Inclusive Education.
    Borko, H. (2004) ‘Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain’, Educational Researcher, 33(8): 32.
    Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J-C. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications.
    Bourke, P.E. (2009) ‘Professional development and teacher aides in inclusive education contexts: Where to from here?’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13: 81727.
    Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (1976) Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books.
    Boyd, W. and Chapman, J. (1987) ‘State-wide educational reform and administrative reorganisation: Australian experience in American perspective’, in W. Boyd and D. Smart (eds), Educational Policy in Australia and America: Comparative Perspectives. Lewes: The Falmer Press.
    Brantlinger, E. (2006) Who Benefits from Special Education? Remediating (Fixing) Other People’s Children. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Brook-Utne, B. (2007) ‘Learning through a familiar language versus learning through a foreign language – a look into some secondary school classrooms in Tanzania’, International Journal of Educational Development, 27(5): 48798.
    Brundrett, M., Fitzgerald, T. and Sommefeldt, T. (2006) ‘The creation of national programmes of school leadership development in England and New Zealand: A comparative study’, International Studies in Educational Administration, 34(1): 89105.
    Bruner, J. (1996) The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    Caldwell, B. (2000) ‘Leadership in the creation of world class schools’, in K. Riley and K. Louis (eds), Leadership for Change and School Reform. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Caldwell, B. (2008) ‘Reconceptualising the self-managing school’, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36(2): 23552.
    Caldwell, B. and Hayward, D. (1998) The Future of Schools: Lessons from the Reform of Public Education. London: Falmer.
    Cardno, C. and Youngs, H. (2013) ‘Leadership development for experienced New Zealand Principals: Perceptions of effectiveness’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41(3): 25671.
    Chapman, J. and Aspin, D. (1997) ‘Autonomy and mutuality: Quality education and self-managing schools’, in T. Townsend (ed.), Restructuring and Quality: Issues for Tomorrow’s Schools. London: Routledge.
    Chapman, J., Dunsan, J. and Spicer, B. (1996) ‘System restructuring: School based management and the achievement of effectiveness in Australian education’, in J. Chapman, W. Boyd, R. Lander and D. Reynolds (eds), The Reconstruction of Education: Quality, Equality and Control. London: Cassell.
    Corbett, J. and Slee, R. (2000) ‘An international conversation of inclusive education’, in F. Armstrong, L. Barton and D. Armstrong (eds), Inclusive Education: Policy, Contexts and Comparative Perspectives. London, UK: David Fulton. pp. 13346.
    Czarniawska, B. and Sevon, G. (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Malmo: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
    Darling-Hammond, L. (2000) Powerful Learning: What We Know about Teaching for Understanding (
    1st
    edn). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Darling-Hammond, L. and Rothman, R. (2011) ‘Lessons learned from Finland, Ontario and Singapore’, in L. Darling-Hammond and R. Rothman (eds), Teacher and Leader Effectiveness in High-Performing Education Systems. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education/CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. pp.111.
    Department for Education (2010) Schools, Pupils and their Characteristics. Available at: http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000925/index.shtml (accessed on 20 April 2011).
    Dorling, D. (2010) Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists. Bristol: The Policy Press.
    Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., Jones, L. and Kerr, K. (2010) Equity in Education: Creating a Fairer Education System: A Manifesto for the Reform of Education in England. University of Manchester: Centre for Equity in Education.
    Easton, D. (1979) A Framework for Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Edge, K. (2001) School-Based Management: Q&A for the Web/Knowledge Nugget. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Engeström, Y. (2001) ‘Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization’, Journal of Education and Work, 14(1): 13356.
    Eskay, M., Onu, V., Igbo, J., Obiyo, N. and Ugwuanyi, L. (2012) ‘Disability within the African culture’, online submission, US-China Education Review, 4: 47384.
    Etzioni, A. (1961) A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organisations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
    Farrell, P. and Balshaw, M. (2002) Teaching Assistants: Practical Strategies for Effective Classroom Support. Beverly, MA: Fulton.
    Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
    Fullan, M. (2007) Leading in a Culture of Change. New York: Jossey Bass.
    Fullan, M. (2014) There is Something Different about 2014. New York: Jossey Bass.
    Gagné, R. (1985) The Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Gatrell, L. and Clifford, N. (2010) Carers Joint Strategic Needs Assessment. London: Tower Hamlets and the National Health Service.
    Giangreco, M. and Ruelle, K. (2008) Teaching Old Logs New Tricks: More Absurdities and Realities in Education. New York: Peytral Publications.
    Gillborn, D. and Youdell, D. (2000) Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform, and Equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Glass, R. (2011) ‘Re-imaging “public education”’. Keynote address at The Doctorate? BELMAS Doctoral Research Interest Group Seminar Series (28 March), Institute of Education, University of London.
    Glatter, R. (2012) ‘Persistent preoccupations: The rise and rise of school autonomy and accountability in England’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40(5): 55975.
    Gough, N. (1999) ‘Surpassing our own histories: Autobiographical methods for environmental education research’, Environmental Education Research, 5(4): 40718.
    Government of Queensland (2011) State Education Week. Available at: http://education.qld.gov.au/projects/educationviews/news-views/2011/mar/state-education-week-110316.html (accessed 28 April 2011).
    Graham, L. and Slee, R. (2008) ‘An illusory interiority: Interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40: 27793.
    Graham, L., Sweller, N. and Van Bergen, P. (2014) ‘Detaining the usual suspects: Charting the use of segregated settings in New South Wales government schools in Australia’, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(1): 23645.
    Greenfield, T. (1975) ‘Theory about organisations: A new perspective and its implications for schools’, in M. Hughes (ed.), Administering Education: International Challenges. London: Athlone Press.
    Gulson, K. (2005) ‘Renovating urban identities: Policy, space and urban renewal’, Journal of Education Policy, 20(2): 14158.
    Hargreaves, A. (2009) The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Harris, K. and Graham, S. (1999) ‘Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development’, Learning Disability Quarterly, 22: 25162.
    Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. London: Polity Press.
    Holmes, B. (1981) Comparative Education: Some Considerations of Method. London: Allen and Unwin.
    Idea Store (2011) About Us. Available at: http://www.ideastore.co.uk/en/articles/about_us (accessed 20 April 2011).
    Jackson, D. and Temperley, J. (2006) ‘From professional learning community to networked learning community’, paper given at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSI), Fort Lauderdale, 4 January.
    Johnson, S. (1996) Leading to Change: The Challenge of the New Superintendency, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Knight, T. (1985) ‘An apprenticeship in democracy’, The Australian Teacher, 11(1): 57.
    Knowles, M. (1970) The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy Versus Pedagogy. New York: Association Press.
    Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New York: Prentice Hall.
    Kopp, W. (1989) An Argument and Plan for the Creation of the Teachers Corporation, senior thesis, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.
    Kotter, J. (2012) Leading Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
    Kozol, J. (2005) The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. New York: Crown Publishers.
    Kraftl, P. (2013) Geographies of Alternative Education: Diverse Learning Spaces for Children and Young People. Bristol: Policy Press.
    Lauglo, J. (1996) ‘Forms of decentralisation and their implications for education’, in J. Chapman, W. Boyd, R. Lander and D. Reynolds (eds), The Reconstruction of Education: Quality, Equality and Control. London: Cassell.
    Lawn, M. (2006) ‘Soft governance and the learning spaces of Europe’, Comparative European Politics: Rethinking European Spaces, 4(2): 3352.
    Leat, D. and Nichols, A. (1997) ‘Scaffolding children’s thinking – doing Vygotsky in the classroom with National Curriculum assessment’, paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 11–14 September, University of York.
    Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, D. Nicholson-Smith, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (originally published 1974).
    Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. and Steinbach, R. (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Buckingham: OUP.
    Levin, B. (2001) Reforming Education: From Origins to Outcomes. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Levin, B. (2005) Governing Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Levin, B. and Fullan, M. (2008) ‘Learning about system renewal’, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36(2): 289303.
    Lingard, R. (2000) ‘It is and it isn’t: Vernacular globalisation’, in N. Burbules and C. Torres (eds), Globalisation and Education: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge. pp. 27596.
    Lugaz, C. and De Grauwe, A. (eds) (2010) Schooling and Decentralization: Patterns and Policy Implications in Francophone West Africa. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.
    Luke, A. (2004) ‘Teaching after the market: From commodity to cosmopolitan’, Teachers College Record, 106(7): 142243.
    Lundgren, U. and Mattsson, K. (1996) ‘Decentralisation by or for school improvement’, in J. Chapman, W. Boyd, R. Lander and D. Reynolds (eds), The Reconstruction of Education: Quality, Equality and Control. London: Cassell.
    MacBeath, J. (2008) ‘Stories of compliance and subversion in a prescriptive policy environment’, Education Management Administration and Leadership, 36(1): 12348.
    MacBeath, J., O’Brien, J. and Gronn, P. (2012) ‘Coping strategies among Scottish headteachers’, School Leadership and Management, 32(5): 42137.
    Marginson, S. and Considine, M. (2000) The Enterprise University. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Martens, K. and Liebfried, S. (2008) ‘The PISA story’, Atlantic Times. Available at: http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=1132 (accessed 13 September 2015).
    Martin, J. (2011) Education Reconfigured: Culture, Encounter and Change. New York: Routledge.
    Marton, F. and Säljö, F. (1976) ‘On qualitative differences in learning – 1: Outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 411.
    McLaughlin, M. and Mitra, D. (2001) ‘Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper and going broader’, Journal of Educational Change, 2(4): 30123.
    McPake, B., Ajuong, F., Forsberg, B., Liambillia, W. and Olenja, J. (2006) ‘The Kenyan model of the Bamako initiative: Potential and limitations’, The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 8(2): 1238.
    Mehrotra, S. (1998) ‘Education for all: Policy lessons from high-achieving countries’, International Review of Education, 44(5/6): 46184.
    Miliband, D. (2004) Personalised Learning: Building a New Relationship with Schools. London: Department for Education and Skills.
    Ministerial Council on Education (2008) Australian Directions in Indigenous Education 2005–2008. Canberra: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.
    Ministry of Education, New Zealand (2011) Overview of Operational Funding Components. Government of New Zealand.
    Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (2015) Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Delhi: Government of India.
    Mitchell, C. and Sackney, L. (1998) ‘Learning about organizational learning’, in K. Leithwood and K.S. Louis (eds), Organizational Learning in Schools. Lisse, NL: Swets and Zeitlinger. pp. 177203.
    Morgan, M. (2010) How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation at Risk. Delhi: Government of India.
    National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) (1978) Teacher Education Curriculum: A Framework. Delhi: Government of India.
    National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) (2009) National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education. Delhi: Government of India.
    National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) (2005) National Curriculum Framework for School Education. Delhi: Government of India.
    National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) (2011) Leading the Change – 50 Years of NCERT. New Delhi: NCERT.
    National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) (2014a) BEd Curriculum. New Delhi: NCERT.
    National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) (2014b) DECCE. New Delhi: NCERT.
    National University of Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA) (2013) NUEPA at a Glance. Delhi: NUEPA.
    NIE (National Institute of Education) (2008) Transforming Teacher Education – Redefined Professionals for 21st Century Schools. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
    Norwich, B. (2013) Addressing Tensions and Dilemmas in Inclusive Education. London: Routledge.
    Nye, J. (2012) The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992) Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2005) Teachers Matter – Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2006) Evidence in Education: Linking Research to Policy. Paris: OECD.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2008) Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2010a) Education at a Glance 2010: OECD Indicators [online]. Available at: www.oecd.org/edu/eag2010 (accessed 20 April 2011).
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2010b) OECD Reviews of Migrant Education – Closing the Gap for Immigrant Students. Paris: OECD.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2015) Education Policy Outlook 2015: Making Reforms Happen. Paris: OECD.
    Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
    Pandey, R. (2007) Education in Emerging Indian Society. Agra: Agrawal Publications.
    Parsons, T. (1964) Essays in Sociological Theory. London: Free Press.
    Pearson Foundation (2011) Finland – Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. Available at: http://www.pearsonfoundation.org/oecd/finland.html (accessed 20 April 2011).
    Phillips, D. and Schweisfurth, M. (2008) Comparative and International Education: An Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice. London: Continuum.
    Piaget, J. (1962) The Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Pritchett, L. and Pandey, V. (2006) ‘Making primary education work for India’s rural poor: A proposal for effective decentralization’, Social Development Papers – South Asia Series, 95/ June.
    Reed, M. (1992) The Sociology of Organisations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    Rigg, J. (2007) An Everyday Geography of the Global South. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Rix, J. (2015) Must Inclusion be Special? Rethinking Educational Support within a Community of Provision: Current Debates in Educational Psychology. London: Routledge.
    Rizvi, F. and Lingard, B. (2010) Globalising Education Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Robertson, S. (2009) Spatialising the Sociology of Education: Stand-points, Entry-points, Vantage-points, Centre of Globalisation, Education and Societies, University of Bristol.
    Rogers, E. (2003) Diffusion of Innovation (
    5th
    edn). New York: Free Press.
    Rouse, M. and Florian, L. (1997) ‘Inclusive education in the marketplace’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(4): 32336.
    Sahlberg, P. (2011a) Finnish Lessons: What can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
    Sahlberg, P. (2011b) ‘Developing effective teachers and school leaders: The case of Finland’, in L. Darling-Hammond and R. Rothman (eds), Teacher and Leader Effectiveness in High-Performing Education Systems. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. pp.1321.
    Schon, D. (2005) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Sexton, S. (1977) ‘Evolution by choice’ in C.B. Cox and R. Boyson (eds) Black Paper 1977. London: Temple Smith.
    Shakespeare, T. (2014) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited (
    2nd
    edn). Abingdon: Routledge.
    Shuangye, C. and Zheng, K. (2014) ‘Why the leadership of change is especially difficult for Chinese principals: A micro-institutional explanation’, Journal of Organisational Change Management, 27(3): 48698.
    Shukla, S. (1992) ‘Pluralism and education in India – problems and possibilities’, Prospects, 22(2): 195206.
    Silverman, D. (1971) The Theory of Organisations: A Sociological Framework. New York: Basic Books.
    Slee, R. (2008) ‘Beyond special and regular schooling? An inclusive education reform agenda’, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(2): 99116.
    Slee, R. (2010) The Irregular School – Exclusion, Schooling and Inclusive Education. London: Routledge.
    Smyth, J. (1989) ‘A pedagogic and educative view of leadership’, in J. Smyth (ed.), Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership. London: Falmer.
    Smyth, J. (ed.) (1993) A Socially-critical View of the Self-managing School. London: Falmer.
    Street, L. and Timperley, R. (2005) Improving Schools through Collaborative Enquiry. London: Continuum.
    Takala, M. (2007) ‘The work of classroom assistants in special and mainstream education in Finland’, British Journal of Special Education, 34: 5057.
    Taylor, C. (2011) ‘Towards a geography of education’, in J. Furlong and M. Lawn (eds), Disciplines of Education: Their Role in the Future of Education Research. London: Routledge.
    Teese, R. and Polesel, J. (2003) Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and Quality in Mass Secondary Education in Australia. Carlton: Melbourne University Publishing.
    Terano, M., Slee, R., Scott, D., Husbands, C., Naoum, D., Zotzmann, K. and Kingdon, G. (2011) International Productive Practices in Education: Research Report to the International Best Practices Exchange Leading to Innovation in Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) Project. New Delhi: Save the Children.
    Teach for America (TFA) (2015) Our History [online]. Available at: https://www.teachforamerica.org/about-us/our-story/our-history (accessed 9 November 2015).
    Tharp, R. and Gallimore, R. (1991) ‘A theory of teaching as assisted performance’, in P. Light, S. Sheldon and M. Woodhead (eds), Learning to Think: Child Development in Social Context, Vol. 2. London: Routledge. pp. 4261.
    Titchkosky, T. (2007) Reading and Writing Disability Differently: The Textured Life of Embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Uddin, J. (2009) ‘Community language provision in Tower Hamlets’, Community Languages, 24.
    UIS – UNESCO Institute of Statistics (2015) Country Profiles – India. Available at: http://www.uis.unesco.org/DataCentre/Pages/country-profile.aspx?code=IND&regioncode=40535 (accessed May 2015).
    UNESCO (2009) Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
    UNESCO (2014) ‘EFA implementation: Teacher and resource management in the context of decentralization’, seminar. Paris: UNESCO.
    UNICEF (2007) Child Poverty in Perspective: An Overview of Child Well-being in Rich Countries, Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
    Urry, J. (2007) Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
    Walker, A., Bryant, D. and Lee, M. (2013) ‘International patterns in principal preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41(4): 40534.
    Warnock Committee (1978) Special Educational Needs: The Warnock Report. London: Department for Education and Science.
    White, J. and Barber, M. (1997) Perspectives on School Effectiveness and School Improvement. London: Institute of Education.
    Whitty, G. (2002) Making Sense of Education Policy: Studies in the Sociology and Politics of Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishers.
    Wigdortz, B. (2012) Success Against the Odds: Five Lessons in how to Achieve the Impossible, the Story of Teach First. London: Teach First.
    Wilkins, R. (2010) ‘The global context of local school leadership’, in M. Coates (ed.), Shaping a New Educational Landscape. London: Continuum.
    Wilkins, R. (2014) Education in the Balance: Mapping the Global Dynamics of School Leadership. London: Bloomsbury.
    Wilkinson, R.G. and Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies almost always do Better. London: Allen Lane.
    Willms, D. (2003) ‘Literacy proficiency of youth: Evidence of converging socioeconomic gradients’, International Journal of Educational Research, 39: 24752.
    Winch, C. (2014) ‘Education and broad concepts of agency’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(6): 56983.
    World Bank (1997) World Bank World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. Washington DC: World Bank.
    World Bank (2005) World Bank World Development Report 2005. Washington DC: World Bank.
    World Health Organisation (WHO) (2011) World Health Statistics 2011. New York: United Nations.
    Yi-Fu Tuan (1996) ‘Space and place: A humanistic perspective’, in A. Agnew, D. Livingstone and A. Rogers (eds), Human Geography: An Essential Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Author index


    • Loading...
Back to Top