Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach
Publication Year: 2012
Subject: Corrections/Penology (general)
Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach is a comprehensive and original introduction to the comparative study of punishment.
Analyzing twelve countries, authors Michael Cavadino and James Dignan offer an integrated and theoretically rigorous approach to comparative penology. They draw upon material provided by a team of eminent penologists to produce an important and highly readable contribution to scholarship in this area.
Early chapters introduce the reader to comparative penology, set out the theoretical framework and consider whether there is currently a ‘global penal crisis.’ Each country is then discussed in turn. Chapters on comparative youth justice and the privatization of prisons follow. Comparisons between countries are drawn within each chapter, giving the reader a synoptic and truly comparative vision of penality in different jurisdictions.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Part 1: About Comparative Penology
Part 2: Penal Systems in Crisis?
- Chapter 2: Globalized Penal Crisis?
- Chapter 3: The United States of America: Law and Order Ideology, Hyperincarceration and Looming Crisis
- Chapter 4: England and Wales: Stop-Go and the Upwards Zig-Zag
- Chapter 5: Australia and New Zealand: Neo-Liberal Punitiveness Down Under
- Chapter 6: South Africa: The Transition from Apartheid
- Chapter 7: Germany: Archetypal Corporatism
- Chapter 8: The Netherlands: A Beacon of Tolerance Dimmed
- Chapter 9: France and Italy: Corporatism and Catholicism
- Chapter 10: Sweden and Finland: Nordic Social Democracy
- Chapter 11: Japan: Iron Fist in a Velvet Penal Glove
- Chapter 12: Comparative Youth Justice
- Chapter 13: Neo-Liberal Youth Justice Systems
- Chapter 14: Youth Justice Systems: Corporatist Variants
- Chapter 15: General Patterns in Youth Justice?
- Chapter 16: Prison Privatization
Part 4: In Conclusion
© Michael Cavadino and James Dignan 2006
First published 2006
Reprinted 2006 (twice), 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 (twice), 2012
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y ISP
SAGE Publications Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B1 /I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd
3 Church Street
#10-04 Samsung Hub
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-0-7619-5202-2 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-0-7619-5203-9 (pbk)
Library of Congress Control Number available
Typeset by C&M Digitals (P) Ltd., Chennai, India
Printed on paper from sustainable resources
Printed and bound in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall
List of Associate Authors[Page vii]
Australia – Andrew McLean Williams (formerly Griffith University, Queensland)
Finland – Raimo Lahti (University of Helsinki) (assisted by Perttu Puro)
France – Robert Cario (Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)
Germany – Frieder Dünkel (Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald)
Italy – Vania Patané (Universität degli Studi di Catania)
Japan – Tadashi Moriyama (University of Takushoku)
Netherlands – Wim Valkenburg (Universität van Tilburg)
New Zealand – John Pratt (Victoria University of Wellington)
South Africa – Dirk van Zyl Smit (University of Nottingham and University of Cape Town)
Sweden – Hanns von Hofer (Stockholms Universitet)
USA – Don Anspach (University of Southern Maine)
The comparative study of crime and punishment, which languished for much of the past century, underwent a marked revival over the past two decades. The case for comparative method is overwhelmingly strong. Robust, commonsensical beliefs, such as that capital punishment ‘obviously’ deters people from murder, can only be tested and, in this case, found to be hugely misconceived, by painstaking contrasts over time and between different societies. But the pitfalls facing comparative study are immense, and help to account for its relative rarity. Gathering data about different societies, with their varying languages, cultures, and institutional structures, is far more complex than focusing on one society alone, difficult as that may be. It is all too easy for comparative projects to run into the sand, gathering mountains of data with no clear basis for their analysis, or falling prey to ‘criminological tourism’, a resort to superficial indicators of what is going on in crime and punishment terms in a range of societies. And some ‘comparative’ studies do not really compare but merely collect together singular and largely unrelated studies of crime and punishment in different societies. These may be valuable in their own right, but they do not add up to more than the sum of their parts. This is precisely what the present authors have achieved. In surmounting these pitfalls, they demonstrate how the promise of comparative penology can be fulfilled.
Mick Cavadino and James Dignan deal successfully with these pitfalls by several key methods. They have evolved from the work of their predecessors, not least Rusche and Kirchheimer (1939), a broad theory of the likely links between criminal justice policies and penal systems, on the one hand, and the nature of a society's political economy, on the other. They weigh this perspective against a selected range of societies, at least one from each continent, avoiding ethno-centrism by working with colleagues who are leading experts in the field in the societies concerned. They thus maintain a common authorial voice, allow for diverse opinions about the interpretation of key developments, but do not ‘lose the plot’. They also gain greatly from the inter-disciplinary character of their work. Their typology of political economy is highly informed by recent work in comparative social policy. Overall, the book is knitted together, despite the wealth of meticulous detail, by a style which conveys complex ideas and analysis with fluency and apparent ease.
[Page ix]All in all, this is a major, and should prove a seminal book, providing a template for the analysis of penal policy and political economy, which in future could be fruitfully extended both to other societies and to changes in those studied here. It could hardly be more timely, as penal policy in the USA at least is now a factor in international relations. The 2000 presidential election pivoted on the results in Florida, which were crucially influenced for Bush and against Gore by the huge numbers of pro-Democrat black and hispanic constituents denied the chance to vote by penal and felon disenfranchisement.
For the first time since the transportation of prisoners came to an end, penal policy is no longer a purely domestic affair, but a field that has ramifications for world politics. It is also now so big a factor that domestically it has become a force for changing the political economy rather than simply being a peripheral outcome. The relation has become a two-way, interactive process, as the authors stress, with the prison budget severely denting those for health and education in states such as California.
It would be all too easy, given this scale of penal increase in the world's most powerful nation, to end on an apocalyptic note. And it is indeed a key question as to whether the USA is a harbinger or an outlier in terms of penal futures for societies which have traditionally embraced far more sparing penal policies, practices and regimes. Cavadino and Dignan resist that lure. They are rightly measured and judicious in their predictions, all too aware of the dangers of mass imprisonment but also of the scope for resistance and reform. Some societies, Sweden, Finland and Japan, for example, despite recent increases in their prison population, and despite their chapter on Japan being an eye-opener for those who thought its low crime and imprisonment rate stemmed from ‘reintegrative shaming’, present a very different set of possibilities. It is for its attention to the peculiar character of each country's penal culture, which is replete with fascinating variations, as well as for its analysis of over-arching trends, that this book should command a close reading and a wide readership.Mannheim Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice London School of Economics January 2005
Preface[Page x]The Nature of This Book
Most comparative penology books to date have fallen into one of two categories. Some (for example, Muncie and Sparks, 1991; Vagg, 1994) cover a relatively limited subject such as imprisonment. Others contain separate chapters from different authors in a range of countries, with the result that (to caricature somewhat) a chapter on parole in Poland might be followed by one on imprisonment in Indonesia or community service in Colombia. In less common vein, van Kalmthout and Tak (1988) is a valuable but relatively atheoretical reference work on the details of different European criminal justice systems, while Downes (1988) is a comparison between just two systems (English and Dutch). Van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001) contains individually-authored reports from 26 countries plus a number of chapters by different authors on comparative aspects of imprisonment while Hamai et al. (1995) contains individually authored reports on probation in various countries. This book differs from all of these others. We present and analyse information from a wide variety of countries representing Western Europe (England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland), the non-European English-speaking world (USA, Australia and New Zealand), the fascinating but rather special case of South Africa, and a single representative of East Asia in the shape of Japan. We hope this width of coverage leads to some interesting comparisons without over-stretching the book hopelessly. However, apart from Japan, these are all broadly speaking ‘Western’ countries, and although we hope we have in places raised some interesting questions about the relationships between punishment in the ‘West’ and what happens in the varied areas of the ‘East’ we can only hope to scratch the surface of some of these broader issues.
Rather than having separate chapters relating to different countries by different authors, we have organized the book more thematically. Parts 1 and 4 attempt an overview of all the countries studied, while Part 3 contains five chapters about two specific aspects of penal theory and practice: youth justice and prison privatization. In these three parts, the comparisons between countries are drawn within each chapter, giving the reader a more synoptic and genuinely comparative vision of penality in different jurisdictions. Part 2 does admittedly contain nine chapters about the individual countries and the historical trends in their penality, but even this part is organized around the concept of ‘penal crisis’, with the aim of comparing the different countries’ tendency to this prevalent malady. [Page xi]The chapters have all been written by the two principal (English) authors (Cavadino and Dignan), our analysis being based on information supplied by our eleven associates in the other countries. The intended result is a work combining a certain level of theoretical depth with a degree of overall coherence which could be easily lost in a book with several authorial voices. (We have found to our gratification that our associates usually agree with our analyses and general outlook, but entire unanimity of viewpoint – let alone prose style – would be too much to hope for, unless we were all members of some disciplined international Marxist organization. Which, we hasten to add, we are not.) So we have included the occasional note of dissent from our associates where appropriate.
Most of the information was gathered by sending a series of questionnaires (six in total) to each associate, asking them all the same detailed questions about the penal systems with which they were familiar. Where necessary, the principal authors followed up subsequently with requests for further or more detailed information from individual countries or accessed information directly from internet sources. Preliminary analyses and drafts were submitted for comment to associates, and this book is the result. The principal authors are of course extremely grateful to all our associates for the wealth of fascinating information they submitted, only a fraction of which is directly used in this book. (Where information about a penal system is unattributed, it was as likely as not provided by one of our contributors. Unless it's wrong, in which case we probably just imagined it.) Cavadino and Dignan take responsibility for the facts, interpretations and values expressed in this book.
This book is designed to complement our textbook on the penal system of England and Wales (Cavadino and Dignan, 2002); we have tried to minimize the degree of repetition between the two volumes while cross-referring to the other as appropriate.Some Words of Explanation, and an Explanation of Some Words
There are various words and concepts which we will be applying repeatedly throughout this book, and it seems helpful to explain some of them here. Not, however, the vital distinction between different types of modern state – neo-liberal, conservative corporatist, social democratic and oriental corporatist, for whose definitions the reader must wait until Chapter 1.Penal Philosophies and Penal Aims
Penal philosophies, or philosophies of punishment, are ideas about what might morally justify practices of punishment. Typically such philosophies also indicate [Page xii]the aims that a morally justified practice of punishment should pursue (and perhaps, should actually achieve if the punishment is to be justified.) (See Cavadino and Dignan, 2002: Chapter 2 for an introduction to penal philosophy.) Such aims include the prevention or reduction of crime through deterrence of offenders and potential offenders and the ‘incapacitation’ of offenders by physically preventing their reoffending through such means as imprisonment. Punishment can also seek to reduce crime by denouncing the offence and sending out moral messages as to the wrongfulness of the offence, and by reforming or (a near-synonym) rehabilitating the offender. We shall at times be distinguishing between reform and resocialization – both of these if successful should lead to an offender ceasing to offend, but the latter is conceived of as a more social process, in which society as a whole plays an important part. (The terms ‘welfare model’ and ‘penal welfarism’ also refer to this rehabilitationist approach.) On the other hand, the retributivist philosophy of punishment seeks not to reduce crime so much as to ensure that offenders receive their ‘just deserts’ in terms of suffering in return for the wrong they have done. One important school of retributivist thought is the ‘justice model’ with its emphasis on due process and the need for proportionality in punishment, which has influenced penal thinking since the early 1970s. Finally, the approach known as restorative justice seeks to ensure that offenders perform reparation to their victims and to the community, that relations are restored and that offenders are reintegrated into the community.
The word ‘positivism’ refers to the theory that criminal behaviour is determined by forces (such as genetic predisposition, upbringing and social situation) beyond the control and responsibility of the individual offender, whose crimes are not therefore seen as resulting from an exercise of free will. Consequently, offenders should not be blamed or given their supposed ‘just deserts’ but given treatment that will reform them, while if necessary incapacitating them from committing crimes for the time being. The contrary approach, classicism, holds the opposite: that offenders are and may be held responsible for their crimes and visited with retributive and/or deterrent punishments.Penal Strategies and Approaches
The penal strategies that governments and policymakers might pursue are related to these penal philosophies, but not as neatly as one might suppose (see Cavadino and Dignan, 2002: 53–4). With Iain Crow, we have developed a three-fold typology of penal strategies (Cavadino et al., 1999). Strategy A is an extremely harsh and punitive approach influenced by ‘law and order ideology’ (Cavadino and Dignan, 1997) or ‘populist punitiveness’ (Bottoms, 1995), which involves punishing offenders as severely as possible. Strategy B represents the application of modern managerialism to punishment to attempt to make the [Page xiii]criminal justice system as effective, efficient and economical as possible. Strategy C seeks to protect and uphold the human rights of individuals, including offenders, victims and potential victims of crime. This approach has several variants, since there has been (and remains) a wide range of views and schools of thought about what it should mean to respect human rights and to be humane in the penal context. Some proponents of Strategy C favour measures to reform and resocialize offenders; others favour restorative justice; still others propound the retributivist ‘justice model’ approach as the best way to safeguard human rights.
A slightly different but related typology of approaches to punishment (or ‘models’) is one which we shall make particular use of in Chapters 12 to 15. This distinguishes between the welfare, justice, minimum intervention, restorative justice and neo-correctionalist models. The justice and restorative justice models have already been briefly explained, and we shall expand on the minimum intervention model (and indeed, all the others) in Chapter 12 in the context of youth justice. The ‘welfare model’ is a version of ‘positivism’ (see above), which stresses the importance of taking action which will be for the benefit of offenders and which will ensure their reform or resocialization.
‘Neo-correctionalism’ is a broad term, which we use to characterize an approach that has been increasingly adopted in many countries in recent decades; sometimes almost to the exclusion of others. This approach embodies the uncompromising punitiveness of Strategy A (see above), and is put forward, in particular by increasingly influential right-wing commentators and politicians, as the real answer to problems of law and order. Sometimes the harshness of Strategy A is relatively unalloyed by any other approach – simple harshness, and in particular a growing reliance on the sanction of imprisonment, is seen as the answer to crime. Sometimes this ‘toughness’ is combined with the managerialism of Strategy B, to produce an approach we have called ‘punitive managerialism’ (Cavadino et al., 1999: 54).
We should also indicate and explain a general dimension that encapsulates many of the detailed differences between philosophies, strategies and approaches. ‘Exclusive’ or ‘exclusionary’ approaches deal with offenders by rejecting them as members of the community and shutting them out of mainstream society by measures such as imprisonment or by stigmatizing them. The exclusionary approach favours punishments such as imprisonment (or even the extreme exclusion of the death penalty), and is allied to Strategy A and to notions of deterrence, incapacitation and an illiberal version of retributivism. The ‘inclusive’ or ‘inclusionary’ approach, on the other hand, seeks to maintain offenders within the community and reintegrate them into mainstream society. It can be found embodied in notions and practices of reform, resocialization, restorative justice and more liberal versions of retributivism (such as the ‘justice model’). (See further Cavadino et al., 1999: 48–50; see also Sanders, 2002).[Page xiv]Penality: Harsh and Lenient
We use the word ‘penality’, in accordance with established academic usage, to refer not only to the practice of punishment but also to ideas and discourse about punishment.
Finally, a word of explanation prompted by the horrified reaction of our Swedish associate Hanns von Hofer when we suggested entitling the section on Sweden and Finland ‘Nordic Social Democratic Leniency’. When we use words like ‘harsh’ and ‘lenient’ in relation to punishment we mean them relatively and neutrally. That is, what we call a ‘harsh’ or ‘lenient’ punishment is one which is more harsh or lenient than what is usually found, and does not necessarily mean that we approve or disapprove. Our general opinion, however – as those who know us are well aware – is that a great deal less ‘harshness’ and a great deal more ‘leniency’ would not go amiss in any of the countries we study in this book, for reasons we have explained elsewhere (Cavadino and Dignan, 2002: Chapter 2; Cavadino et al., 1999: Chapter 2).
As well as our associate authors, thanks are also due to Anton van Kalmthout (Netherlands) and David Moore (Australia), who helped get our research on their countries off the ground, to Yasu Watanabe, who provided additional feedback in relation to Japan, and to David Downes, David Greenberg, Julian Roberts and Tony Bottoms.
And, of course and as ever, to Lucille Cavadino and Angela Dignan for their love and support.[Page xvi]
References[Page 344]2002) ‘The Finnish juvenile justice system’. Paper presented at the 2nd International Association of Prosecutors (IAP) European Regional Conference held at the Hague, 20–22 March 2002.(1986) Jugendrichter und Jugendstaatsanwälte in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Freiburg: Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht., and (1997) ‘Land of decreasing prison population’, in HEUNI (1997) Prison Population in Europe and in North America: Problems and Solutions. Helsinki: Ministry of Justice, pp. 269–76(1997) ‘Sentencing and punishment in Germany’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1997), pp. 181–7.(2004) ‘Youth justice in Germany’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 443–93.(Alder, C. and Wundersitz, J. (eds) (1994) Family Conferencing and Juvenile Justice: The Way Forward or Misplaced Confidence?Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.1989) Off the Treadmill, BBC Radio Four, 15 August 1989.(2000) ‘Evaluation of the youth court demonstration project’. Home Office Research Study No. 214. London: Home Office., and (2004) Corrections in America: An Introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004., and (American Friends Service Committee (1971) Struggle for Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.1992) The Option of Prison Privatization: A Guide for Community Deliberations. Athens, GA: University of Georgia., and (Amnesty International (1998) Japan: Abusive Punishments in Japanese Prisons. Amnesty International Report—ASA 22/004/1998. 1 June 1998. Also available online at: http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/ASA220041998?OpenDocument&of=COUNTRIES\JAPANAmnesty International (2001) Japan: Annual Report Covering Events from January to December 2000. Also available online at: http://www.web.amnesty.org/web/ar2001.nsf/webasacountries/JAPAN?OpenDocument1989) Children and Juveniles in Prisons in South Africa: Report by an Interdisciplinary Group from Switzerland and Germany. Heidelberg: Druckerei Gebard.(1995) ‘Corrections in the German Democratic Republic: a field for research’, British Journal of Criminology, 35: 81–94.(Asian and Pacific Conference of Correctional Administrators (APCCA) (2001) Prison Statistics, Asia and the Pacific, 2000. Record of the 20th APCCA conference. Available online at: http://www.apcca.org/pubs/20th/appendixG.htmlAsian and Pacific Conference of Correctional Administrators (APCCA) (2002) Prison Statistics, Asia and the Pacific, 2002. Record of the 22nd APCCA conference. Available online at: http://www.apcca.org/main_statistics_22nd_APCCA.htm[Page 345]1983) Children and Justice: Decision-Making in Children's Hearings and Juvenile Courts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.(1995) ‘Boot camps and justice: A contradiction in terms?’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 46, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.(Audit Commission (1996) Misspent Youth: Young People and Crime. London: Audit Commission.Audit Commission (2004) Youth Justice 2004: A Review of the Reformed Youth Justice System. London: Audit Commission.2001) Emerging Issues on Privatized Prisons. National Council on Crime and Delinquency Bureau of Justice Assistance Monograph. Available online at: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/bja/181249.pdf or at: http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles1/bja/181249.txtand (Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) ‘705.0 Population, distribution, indigenous australians 1996’. Press Release.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999) ‘Australia now—a statistical profile: crime and justice corrective services’. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/ABS@.nsf/Australian Institute of Criminology (2002) Australian Crime—Facts and Figures 2001. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.1994) ‘USA prison privateers: neo-colonists in a southern land’, in P.Moyle (ed.), Private Prisons and Police: Recent Australian Trends, pp. 125–38. Leichhardt, NSW: Pluto Press Australia.(1989) Equal Justice and the Death Penalty: A Legal and Empirical Analysis, NorthEastern University Press., and (2002) International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics 2000. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 05/02. London: Home Office. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hosb601.pdfand (2001) International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. 06/01. London: Home Office., and (2003) Statistics on Juvenile Detention in Australia, 1981–2002. Australian Institute of Criminology Technical and Background paper series. No. 5. Canberra: AIC.and (1973) The Liberal Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1963) On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.(1997) ‘Correctional populations in the United States, 1995’, Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.(1968) ‘Crime and punishment: an economic approach’, Journal of Political Economy, 76: 169–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259394(1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2001) ‘Governing social marginality: welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy’, Punishment and Society, 3: 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228249and (2003) ‘Prison privatization developments in South Africa’, Chapter 15 in Coyle et al. (2003).(1996) ‘Prison privatization: an international perspective’ in R.Matthews and P.Francis (eds), Prisons 2000: An International Perspective on the Current State and Future of Imprisonment. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.and (1992) Privatizing van Gavangenissen, Brussels: VUB Press., and ([Page 346]1999) ‘Deaths in private prisons, 1990–1999: a comparative study’, Australian Institute of Criminology, Trends and Issues in Crime and Justice, June 1999.and (2004) Reducing Crime, Changing Lives. London: Home Office.(1997) Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995. Washington DC: BJS.(1997) Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison. Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, March.and (1980) ‘The “justice model” in America and Britain: development and analysis’, in A.E.Bottoms and R.H.Preston (eds), The Coming Penal Crisis: A Criminological and Theological Exploration. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, pp. 25–52.(1986) ‘Blue-prints for criminal justice: reflections on a policy plan for the Netherlands’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 25: 199–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1986.tb00558.x(1983) ‘Neglected features of contemporary penal systems’, in D.Garland and P.Young (eds), The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social AnalysisLondon: Heinemann, pp. 166–202.(1995) ‘The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing’, in Clarkson and Morgan (1995), pp. 17–49.(1995) ‘The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing’, in C.Clarkson and R.Morgan (eds), The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 17–49.(2002) ‘Policy and practice in England and Scotland’, in M.K.Rosenheim, RE.Zimring, D.S.Tanenhaus and B.Dohrn (eds), A Century of Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chapter 8.(2004) ‘Youth justice in Great Britain’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–183.and (1990) Intermediate Treatment and Juvenile Justice. London: HMSO., , , and (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804618(1976) The Effectiveness of Sentencing. Home Office Research Study No. 35. London: HMSO.(1991) ‘The state of the prisons in NSW under the Greiner government: definitions of value’, Journal of Justice Studies, 4: 27–60.(1998) ‘Penality and imprisonment in Australia’, in Weiss and South (1998) pp. 367–400.(2000) Care and Protection Is About Adult Behaviour: The Ministerial Review of the Department of Child, Youth and Family Services. Report to the New Zealand Minister of Social Services and Employment.(2004) National Victims of Crime Survey, South Africa 2003. Monograph No. 101. Available online at: http://www.iss.co.za/pubs/Monographs/No101/Contents.html, , , , and (1979) ‘Trends in incarceration in the US since 1880’, Crime and Delinquency, 25: 9–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001112877902500102(2002) Statistics on Juvenile Detention in Australia: 1981–2001. Australian Institute of Criminology Technical and Background Paper Series No. 1. Also available online at: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tbp/tbp001.pdfand (Cario, R. (ed.) (1997) La Médiation Pénale: Entre répression et réparation. Paris: L'Harmattan.2000) Jeunes Délinquants. A la Recherche de la Socialisation Perdue.([Page 347]2nd ed.Paris: L'Harmattan.2002) Review of PFI and Market Testing in the Prison Service. UM. Prison Service. Extracts from the executive summary are available Online at: http://www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/library/dynpage.asp?Page=964 (accessed 25 September 2003).(2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime. London: Home Office.(2003) ‘La Loi No. 2002–1138 du 9 September 2002: Un nouveau regard porté sur le droit pénal des mineurs. Le Dalloz, no. 12, pp. 779–85.(1997a) The Law of Gravity: Offence Seriousness and Criminal Justice. Sheffield: Joint Unit for Social Services Research.(1997b) ‘A vindication of the rights of psychiatric patients’, Journal of Law and Society, 24: 235–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00044(2005) ‘Review of M. Tonry, “Thinking about crime: sense and sensibility in american penal culture”’, forthcoming in Crime, Media, Culture, 1: 124–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/174165900500100114(1997) The Penal System: An Introduction.and (2nd edn.London: Sage.2002) The Penal System: An Introduction.and (3rd edn.London: Sage.1999) Criminal Justice 2000: Strategies for a New Century. Winchester: Waterside Press., and (Centre for Public Services (2002) Privatising Justice: The Impact of the Private Finance Initiative in the Criminal Justice System. London: Justice Forum/Centre for Public Services. Also available online at: http://www.centre.public.org.uk/briefings/privatisingjustice.pdf (Accessed 2 October 2003).2003) ‘The decline in support for penal welfarism: evidence of support among the elite for punitive segregation’, British Journal of Criminology43: 434–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.2.434and (1968) ‘Changes in penal values’, in N.Christie et al. (eds), Scandinavian Studies in Criminology. Halden: Universiteitsforlaget, pp. 161–72.(1977) ‘Conflicts as property’, British Journal of Criminology, 17: 1–15.(1993) Crime Control as Industry: Towards Gulags Western Style?London: Routledge.(1994) Crime Control as Industry: Towards GULAGS, Western Style,(2nd edn.London: Routledge.CIA, The World Factbook. Available online at: http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.htmlClarkson, C. and Morgan, R. (eds) (1995) The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.1976) Crime Control in Japan. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.(1987) ‘International comparison of prison populations’, Home Office Research Bulletin, 23: 48–54.and (2001) ‘France’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 253–87.(Commission d'Enquěte sur la Délinquance des Mineurs (Commission of Inquiry into Juvenile Delinquency) (2002) La République en quěte de respect. Les Rapports du Sénat, no. 340, 2001–2, pp. 163ff.Commission of Inquiry into the Prison System (1989) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Prison System (Roper Report). Wellington: Department of Justice.Community Law Centre (South Africa) (1997) Children in Prison in South Africa: A Situational Analysis. Bellville: University of the Western Cape.2000) ‘Minors under the Italian juvenile justice system’. Paper delivered at the conference on Strengthening and Implementation of Effective Judicial Protection of Minors in the Russian Federation, St Petersburg, 20–1 April 2000.([Page 348]Council of Europe (1987) Recommendation No. R(87) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Social Reactions to Juvenile Delinquency. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 September 1987 at the 410th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Council of Europe (1987 and 2003) Recommendation Rec (2003) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning New Ways of Dealing with Juvenile Delinquency and the Role of Juvenile Justice. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 September 2003 at the 853rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Council of Europe (1993) Report to the Dutch Government on the Visit to the Netherlands Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 30 August to 8 September 1992. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Council of Europe (2000) Penological Information Bulletin. No. 22. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.2003) Capitalist Punishment: Prison Privatization and Human Rights. London: Zed Books., and (Criminal Justice Commission (2001) Criminal Justice System Monitor Volume 5. Brisbane: Criminal Justice Commission.1996) ‘Prisons in crisis: the American experience’, in R.Matthews and P.Francis (eds), Prisons 2000: An International Perspective on the Current and Future of Imprisonment. London: Macmillan, pp. 21–52., and (1985) Confronting Crime. New York: Pantheon.(1996) Is America Really Winning the War on Crime and Should Britain Follow its Example?London: NACRO.(1998) Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Henry Holt.(2001) ‘Conferencing in Australia and New Zealand: Variations, research findings and prospects’, in A.M.Morris and G.Maxwell (eds), Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circles. Oxford: Hart Publishing, Chapter 4.(2001) ‘Restorative justice and conferencing in Australia’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No. 186. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.and (2002) ‘Major reforms ahead for legal education in Japan’, Cavendish Publishing Academic Reporter Issue 3, Summer 2002.(Department of Correctional Services (South Africa) (2000) Trends in the Offender Population: January 1995 to July 2000. Report prepared for the National Council on Correctional Services.Department of Correctional Services (South Africa) (2001) Annual Report 2000/2001. Cape Town: Formeset Printers.Department of Correctional Services (South Africa) (2003) Annual Report 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003. Cape Town: Formeset Printers. Also available online at: http://www.dcs.gov.za/annual_report/Annual_Report2002/Content.htmDepartment of Correctional Services (2004) Annual Report 2003/04. Available Online at: http://www-dcs.pwv.gov.za/annual_report/Annual_Report2003.Department of Justice (1981) Report of the Penal Policy Review Committee. Wellington: Department of Justice.Department of Social Welfare (New Zealand) Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective (1986) Puao-Te-Atu-Tu (Daybreak), Wellington: Department of Social Welfare.1982) Armenzorg in Nederland’, in B.Kruithof, J.Noordman and P. deRooyeds (eds), Geschiedenis van Opvoeding en Onderwijs, pp. 96–105. Nijmegen: SUN.(1999a) ‘Restorative crime prevention in theory and practice’, Prison Service Journal, 123: 2–5.([Page 349]1999b) ‘The Crime and Disorder Act and the prospects for restorative justice’,  Criminal Law Review, 48–60.(2002) ‘Restorative justice and the law: the case for an integrated, systemic approach’, in L.Walgrave (ed.), Restorative Justice and the Law. Leuven: Leuven University Press.(2005) Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.(2003) ‘Globalisation and comparative penal policy’. Paper delivered at the Sheffield Globalisation Conference, University of Sheffield, April 2003.and (2001) ‘Restorative justice and family group conferences in England’, in A.Morris and G.Maxwell (eds), Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circles. Oxford: Hart Publications, Chapter 5.and (1990) ‘The duty to govern: a critical perspective on the private management of prisons and jails’, in D.McDonald (ed.), Private Prisons and the Public Interest. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 155–78.(2002) ‘Modern juvenile justice in Europe’, Chapter 16 in M.K.Rosenheim, F.E.Zimring, D.S.Tanenhaus and B.Dohrn (eds), A Century of Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2004) ‘Youth justice in Canada’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 185–242.and (2004) ‘Varieties of youth justice’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–20.and (1982) ‘The origins and consequences of Dutch penal policy since 1945’, British Journal of Criminology, 22: 325–62.(1988) Contrasts in Tolerance: Post-War Penal Policy in The Netherlands and England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1990) ‘Response to Harman Franke’, British Journal of Criminology, 30: 94–6.(1997) ‘Prison does wonders for the jobless figures’, The Guardian, 25 November 1997.(1998) ‘The buckling of the shields: Dutch penal policy 1985–1995’, in Weiss and South (1998), pp. 143–74.(2001) ‘The macho penal economy: mass incarceration in the United States—a European perspective’, Punishment and Society, 3: 61–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228258(‘Welfare and punishment in comparative context’, in S.Armstrong and L.McAra (eds), Perspectives on Punishment: The Contours of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.and (forthcoming)2000) The Impact of Neo-liberal Policies on Social Work in New Zealand. See Brown (2000).and (1994) ‘Untersuchungshaft als Krisenmanagement? Daten und Fakten zur Praxis der Untersuchungshaft in den 90er Jahren’, Neue Kriminalpolitik, 6: 20–9.(1995) ‘Imprisonment in transition: the situation in the new states of the Federal Republic of Germany’, British Journal of Criminology, 35: 95–113.(1996a) ‘Current directions in criminal policy’, in W.McCarney (ed.), Juvenile Delinquents and Young People in Danger in an Open Environment. Winchester 1996, S. 38–74, 214–222 (Erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung von Nr. 163).(1996b) Empirische Forschung Im Strafvollzug. Bonn: Forum Verlag Godesberg.([Page 350]1998) ‘Juvenile justice systems in Europe—legal aspects and actual developments’, in UNAFEI Resource Material Series No. 52. Fuchu, Tokyo 1998, S. 275–321.(2003) ‘Youth violence and juvenile justice in Germany’, in F.Dünkel (ed.), Youth Violence: New Patterns and Local Responses—Experiences in East and West. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg, pp. 96–141.(2001) ‘Überbelegung im Strafvollzug—Gefnangenraten im internationalen Vergleich’, in G.Britz, H.Jung, H.Koriath and E.Müller (eds), Grundfragen Staatlichen Strafens. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, pp. 133–70.and (2001) ‘Germany’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 288–350.and (Dünkel, F., van Kalmthout, A. and Schüler-Springorum, H. (eds) (1997) Entwicklungstendenzen und Reformstrategien im Jugendstrafrecht im Europäischen Vergleich. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.1964) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.(2001) The Prison Population in 2000: A Statistical Review, Home Office Research Findings No. 154. London: Home Office.and (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1954) The Psychology of Politics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1958) Sense and Nonsense in Psychology, revised edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(2001) ‘Juvenile justice in the United States’. Paper presented at a conference on ‘Crime and justice’ — a review of research on comparative juvenile justice, held at Cambridge, 18–20 October 2001.and (1991) ‘Prisons in France: stalemate or evolution?’ in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (1991) pp. 249–78.(1996) Darkness and Light: Justice, Crime and Management for Today. London: Howard League.(1979) Juvenile Justice Philosophy: Readings, Cases and Comments,and (2nd edn.St Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.1992) ‘The New Penology’, Criminology, 39: 449–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.xand (1991) ‘The privatization of prisons in historical perspective’, Criminal Justice Research Bulletin, 6: 1–10.(2002) ‘Entrepreneurs of punishment: the legacy of privatization’, Punishment and Society, 4: 321–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146247402400426770(1982) Imprisonment and the Criminal Justice System in the Federal Republic of Germany. Bremen: Universität Bremen.(1988) Reducing the Prison Population: Lessons from the West German Experience?London: NACRO.(1990) New Social Strategies and the Criminal Justice System. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, PC-CRC(90)14.(1993) ‘Institutional resistance against prisoners' rights’, Howard Journal, 32: 127–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00768.x(1998) ‘Germany: ups and downs in the resort to imprisonment—strategic or unplanned outcomes?’, in Weiss and South (1998) pp. 233–61.and (1999) Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court. New York: Oxford University Press.(Fick Commission (1947) Rapport van de Commissie voor de Verdere Uitbouw van het Gevangeniswezen. The Hague: Staatsdrukkerij.Finnish Ministry of Justice (2003a) Summary: Crime Trends in Finland. Helsinki: Ministry of Justice.[Page 351]Finnish Ministry of Justice (2003b) Nuorisorikostoimikunnan mietintö, [English translation: Report of the Juvenile Justice Commission], Committee Report 2003:2, Ministry of Justice, Edita Publishing 2003.Finnish Prison Service (2001) ‘Principal offence of prisoners serving a sentence according to their age on 1 May 2001’. Vankeinhoito—Vankien päärikos. Available online at: http://www.vankeinhoito.fi/11143.htm1999) ‘New Labour, old hat: youth justice and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 36–47.(1977) Prisoners in Revolt. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1982) British Prisons,and (2nd edn.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.2001) ‘United States of America—the federal system’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 676–94.(1995) ‘Germany's crime backlash’, Prison Report, no. 30, Spring 1995: 8–9.(1992) ‘The benevolent paternalism of Japanese criminal justice’, California Law Review, 80: 317–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3480769(1995) ‘Sentencing reform in Victoria: a case study’, in Clarkson and Morgan (1995), pp. 51–94.(1997a) ‘Sentencing reform in Victoria’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1997), pp. 148–52.(1997b) ‘Sentencing and punishment in Australia in the 1990s’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1997), pp. 156–63.(2001) ‘Three strikes and you're out—it's not cricket: colonization and resistance in Australian sentencing’, in Tonry and Frase (2001), pp. 30–61.(1988) Sentencing Young Offenders. Commonwealth Youth Bureau and Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney, pp. 1–12, 56–9., Fox, , (1996) ‘The population boom’, Corrections Today, 58: 38–434.(1993) The Culture of Contentment. London: Penguin Books.(1995) ‘The penal system in France: from correctionalism to managerialism’, in Ruggiero et al. (1995) pp. 71–92.(2002) ‘Why Finland is soft on crime’, Ottawa Citizen, 18 March 2002.(1985) Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Aldershot: Gower.(1995) ‘Penal modernism and postmodernism’, in T.Blomberg and S.Cohen (eds), Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honour of Sheldon Messinger. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, pp. 181–209.(2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1998) ‘Italy’, in J.Mehlbye and L.Walgrave (eds), Confronting Youth in Europe: Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice. Copenhagen: AFK Forlaget, Chapter 9.and (1998) ‘Canadian prisons’, in Weiss and South (1998), pp. 61–98.and (1998) ‘France’, in J.Mehlbye and L.Walgrave (eds), Confronting Youth in Europe: Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice. Copenhagen: AFK Forlaget, Chapter 6.and (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.(2004) World Cultures: Japan. London: Hodder & Staughton Ltd.(1991) ‘Italy—the right to communicate with the outside world: between the “opening” of prisons and the protection of society’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (1991), pp. 357–82.(1961) Asylums. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor.(Goldson, B. (ed.) (2000) The New Youth Justice. Lyme Regis, Dorset: Russell House Publishing.[Page 352]1997) ‘Truth in sentencing in New South Wales’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1997), pp. 152–6.(2001) Prison Privatization in South Africa: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities. Monograph No. 64. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. Also available online at: http://www.iss.co.za/Pubs/Monographs/No64.html (accessed 18 September 2003).(1995) ‘The demonization of young offenders: the new enemy within’. Paper presented at the British Criminology Conference, University of Loughborough, 20 July 1995.(1990) ‘Decarceration in the Federal Republic of Germany: how practitioners are succeeding where policy-makers have failed’, British Journal of Criminology, 30: 150–70.(1999) ‘Punishment, division of labor, and social solidarity’, in W.S.Laufer and F.Adler (eds), The Criminology of Criminal Law, Advances in Criminological Theory Vol. 8. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, pp. 283–361.(2001) ‘Novus ordo saeclorum? A commentary on Downes, and on Beckett and Western’, Punishment and Society, 3: 81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228267(2000) ‘Prison privatization: recent developments in the United States’. Paper presented at the ICOPA conference, Toronto, Canada on 12 May 2000.(1995) Three Strikes and You're Out: Estimated Benefits and Costs of California's New Mandatory Sentencing Law (Report No. MR-509—RC). Santa Monica: Rand Corporation., , , , , and (2002) ‘Changing conceptions of child welfare in the United States, 1820–1935’, in M.K.Rosenheim, F.E.Zimring, D.S.Tanenhaus and B.Dohrn (eds), A Century of Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chapter 1.(1982) Broken Promises: How Americans Fail Their Children. New York: Basic Books.and (1990) ‘Profyt by Privatisering van Straf: een Besprekingsartikel’, Recht en Kritiek, 16: 135.(1991) Authority without Power: Law and the Japanese Paradox. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.(1996) ‘Crime prevention through restorative justice: lessons from Japan’, in B.Galaway and J.Hudson (eds), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Amsterdam: Kugler.(1979) ‘The great moving right show’, Marxism Today, 23: 14–20.(1980) Drifting into a Law and Order Society. London: Cobden Trust.(1988) The Hard Road to Renewal. London: Verso.(1978) Policing the Crisis. London: Macmillan., , , and (1998) The Evaluation of Children's Hearings in Scotland, vol. 2. The International Context: Trends in Juvenile Justice and Child Welfare. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.and (1998) The Evaluation of Children's Hearings in Scotland: vol. 1: Deciding in Children's Interests. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.and (2001) Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales. London: Home Office Communication Directorate.(1995) Probation Round the World: A Comparative Study. London and New York: Routledge., , , and (2000) ‘Victims of crime in criminal justice in Japan: a comprehensive study of victims, views of offenders and criminal justice system and offenders' views of victims’. Paper presented at the 10th international symposium of Victimology in Montreal on 7 August 2000. Also available online at: http://www.jcps.ab.psiweb.com/survey.htm, and ([Page 353]1994) ‘Privatising prisons: principle and practice’. Unpublished paper.(1998) ‘Private prisons in Australia: the second phase’. Trends and Issues in Crime and Justice. Number 84. April 1998. Australian Institute of Criminology.(2003) ‘Detention in delinquency cases, 1990–1999’. Available online from the OJJDP website at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ojjdp(2004) Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2003. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. NCJ203947, May 2004.and (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.(1981) Towards an Understanding of Prison Gangs. Cape Town: Institute of Criminology, University of Cape Town.(2001) Contracting Out: Time for a Policy Rethink?Swinburne Institute for Social Research. Also available Online at: http://www.sisr.net/programcsp/seminarpapers/contracting_asphayward.PDF (accessed 23 September 2003).and (1989) ‘Jugenstrafrechtsreform durch die Praxis—eine Bestandsoufnahme’, in Bundesministeriumder Justiz (ed.), Jugenstrafrechtsreform durch die Praxis, Bonn: Berg Verlag, pp. 13–44.(1990) ‘Gleichheit vor dem Gesetz in der Sanktionspraxis? Empirische Befunde der Sanktionsforschung im Jugendstrafrecht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in H.Göppinger (ed.), Kriminologie und Strafrechtspraxis. Tagungsberichte des kriminologischen Arbitreises. Vol. 7, pp. 171–209. Tübingen: Aktuelle Probleme der Kriminologie.(1992) ‘Abschied von der “Erziehungsideologie im Jugendstrafrecht”? Zur Diskussion über Erziehung und Strafe’. Recht der Jugend und des Bildungswesens, 40: 123–43.(1981) Competition and Control at Work: the New Industrial Sociology. London: Heinemann Educational.(1986) Allochtone Jongeren by de Jeugdpolitie (Minority juveniles at the juvenile police). Den Haag: CWOK.(Home Office (1980) Young Offenders, Cmnd 8045. London: HMSO.Home Office (1988) Punishment, Custody and the Community, Cm 424. London: HMSO.Home Office (1990) Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public: The Government's Proposals for Legislation, Cm 965. London: HMSO.Home Office (1996) Prison Statistics, England and Wales 1995, Cm 3355. London: HMSO.Home Office (1997a) No More Excuses: A New Approach to Tackling Youth Crime in England and Wales, Cm 3809. London: Stationery Office.Home Office (1997b) Prison Statistics, England and Wales 1996, Cm 3732. London: The Stationery Office.Home Office (2000) Criminal Statistics England and Wales 1999, Cm 5001. London: The Stationery Office.Home Office (2001) Prison Statistics England and Wales 2000, Cm 5250. London: The Stationery Office.Home Office (2003) Criminal Statistics, England and Wales 2002, Cm 6054. London: The Stationery Office.Home Office (2004a) Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System 2003. London: Home Office.Home Office (2004b) Youth — The Next Steps: Summary of Responses and the Government's Proposals. London: Home Office Juvenile Offenders' Unit. Published 4 March 2004. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/youthjusticeresponse.html[Page 354]Home Office (2004c) Criminal Statistics, England and Wales 2003, Cm 6341. London: The Stationary Office.Home Office, Lord Chancellor's Department and Youth Justice Board (2002) Referral Orders and Youth Offender Panels: Guidance for Courts, Youth Offending Teams and Youth Offender Panels. London: Home Office/Lord Chancellor's Department/Youth Justice Board. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/referral_orders_and_yop.pdf1962) Sentencing in Magistrates' Courts. London: Stevens.(1972) Sentencing the Motoring Offender. London: Heinemann.(1996) The Death Penalty: A World-Wide Perspective,(2nd edn.Oxford: Clarendon Press.1999) ‘The role of apology in the Japanese criminal justice system’. Paper presented at the Restoration for Victims of Crime Conference convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology in conjunction with the Victims and Referral Service, Melbourne, September 1999.and (1998) Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study No. 179. London: Home Office.and (2002) Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Valley Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation., and (1987) Justice Through Punishment: A Critique of the ‘Justice Model’ of Corrections. London: Macmillan Education.(1987) The Fatal Shore: A History of Transportation of Convicts to Australia 1787–1868. London: Collins Harvill.(Human Rights Watch (1995) Prison Conditions in Japan. New York: Human Rights Watch.Human Rights Watch (1999) World Report 1999: South Africa: Human Rights Developments. Available online at: http://hrw.org/worldreport99/africa/southafrica.html1986) ‘Mediation in Finland’, The Newsletter of FIRM, the forum for initiatives in Reparation and Mediation, Volume 2, no. 3, 1986.(2000) ‘Mediation in Finland’, in T.Peters (ed.), Victim—Offender Mediation in Europe. Making Restorative Justice Work. European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice. Leuven: KU Leuven. Also available online at: http://www.restorativejustice.org/rj3/Feature/April02/Finland.htm(Institute on Money in State Politics (2001) ‘A contributing influence: the private-prison industry and political giving in the south’. Available online at: http://www.followthemoney.org/press/prisons.phtmlInternational Centre for Prison Studies (2004) Prison Brief for Japan. Available Online at: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/icps/worldbrief/continental_asia_records.php?code=97 (Accessed 30 July 2004).1997) Privatizing Prisons: Rhetoric and Reality. London: Sage., , and (2004) ‘Youth Justice in Sweden’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago. University of Chicago Press, pp. 391–441.(Japan Federation of Bar Associations (1990) What's Daiyo-Kangoku?Tokyo: Japan Federation of Bar Associations.Japan Federation of Bar Associations (1992) Prisons in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Federation of Bar Associations.[Page 355]Japan Federation of Bar Associations (1998) Alternative Report to the Fourth Periodic Report of Japan on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Available online at: http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/hrsympo/jrt/hreng4.htmJapan Federation of Bar Associations (1999) Looking for Criminal Procedure for the New Century (Atarashi seiko no keiji tetsudduki wo motomete). Tokyo: Japan Federation of Bar Associations.Japanese Ministry of Justice (1999) ‘Summary of the White Paper on crime, 1998’. Available online at: http://www.moj.go.jp/ENGLISH/RATI/1998/rati-01.htmlJapanese Ministry of Justice (2000) ‘Penal code crime cases known to the police, cases cleared up and arrestees by type of crime (1980–99)’ National Police Agency Criminal Investigation Agency, Table 23–1. Available online at: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/1431-23.htmJapanese Ministry of Justice (2002) White Paper on Crime 2001. Tokyo: Research and Training Institute, Ministry of Justice.Japanese Ministry of Justice (2003) White Paper on Crime 2002. Tokyo: Research and Training Institute, Ministry of Justice.Japanese Ministry of Justice (n.d.) Public Prosecutor's Office. Available online at: http://www.moj.go.jp/ENGLISH/PPO/ppo-01.html1995) ‘The Swedish sentencing reform’, in Clarkson and Morgan (1995), pp. 95–123.(1996) Japanese Corrections: Managing Convicted Offenders in an Orderly Society. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.(1998) ‘The Japanese experience: effects of decreasing resort to imprisonment’, in Weiss and South (1998), pp. 337–66.(1995) ‘Age of criminal proceedings in Europe’. Howard League Report, 10–4.(2000) ‘Penal policy-making: elitist, populist or participatory?’, Punishment & Society, 2: 161–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740022227935(1984) ‘Questioning the new orthodoxy’, Community Care, 11 October: 26–9.(2001) Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America: Finland. Helsinki: HEUNI (European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control). Also available online at: http://www.heuni.fi/uploads/mw1ahyuvuylrx.pdf, and (1982) ‘Holland’, in M.W.Klein (ed.), Western Systems of Juvenile Justice, Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 121–47.(1983) Jeugddelinquentie—Achtergronden en Justitiële Reactie. WODC. Den Haag: Staatsuitgeveij.(2004) ‘Social welfare and youth justice in the Netherlands’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 293–347.(Justitiedepartementet (1993) Att Renovera en Förfallen Kriminalpolitik. Stockholm: Justitiedepartementet.2001) ‘Japan’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 425–47.(Kangaspunta, K., Jouttsen, M., Ollus, N. and Nevala, S. (eds) (1999) Profiles of Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America, 1990–4. Helsinki: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control (HEUNI).1963) ‘Dispute resolution in contemporary Japan’, in A.T.von Mehren (ed.), Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 44–72.(2000) Children's Hearings and the Sheriff Court,(2nd edn.Edinburgh: Butterworths.1993) ‘The penal climate of the Netherlands’, in Dutch and Japanese Laws Compared. Tokyo: International Center for Comparative Law and Politics, pp. 325–39.([Page 356]2001) ‘The Netherlands’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 478–507.(1988) Commission of Review into Corrective Services in Queensland, Final Report. Brisbane: QGPS.(2003) ‘Prisoners in the Federal Republic of Germany’ Krim-Dok-Online. http://www.ifk.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/krimdok(1984) ‘The Federal Republic of Germany’, in M.W.Klein (ed.), Western Systems of Juvenile Justice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 147–70.and (1984) Why is there Less Crime in Japan?Orientation Seminars on Japan: No. 15, The Japan Foundation, Office for the Japanese Study Center. Tokyo: Japan.(2000) Report of the Independent Investigation into the Management and Operation of Victoria's Private Prisons (Chairman P. Kirby), 2 vols, Melbourne: State of Victoria.(Kleinwort Benson Australia Ltd (1989) ‘Investigation into private sector involvement in the New South Wales corrective services system’. Unpublished Government Report, Sydney.2003) Stopreactie: Redenen van Niet Bereik. Amsterdam: DSP-groep., , and (2003) ‘Is the PFI about to hit the buffers?’, The Banker. Available Online at: http://www.thebanker.com/news/archivestory.php/aid/224/Is_the_PFI_about_to_hit_the_buffers_.html (Accessed on 8 October 2003).(1999) A cultural study of the low crime rate in Japan’, British Journal of Criminology, 39(3): 369–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/39.3.369(Kriegler Commission (1995) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Unrest in Prisons. Pretoria: Government Printer.1986) ‘The watershed of juvenile justice reform’, Crime and Delinquency, 32: 5–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128786032001002, , and (1990) ‘The HALT programme: diversion of juvenile vandals’, Dutch Penal Law and Policy: Notes on Criminological Research from the Research and Documentation Centre. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Justice.(2001). Het Nieuwe Jeugdstrafrecht: Vij Jaar Ervaring in de Praktijk. Den Haag: Ministry of Justice/WODC.and (1998) Criminal Justice System at Wor 1998: Outline of Crime Trends, Criminal Procedure and Juvenile Justice System in Japan. Available online at: http://www.jcps.ab.psiweb.com/con1.htmand (1977) ‘Criminal sanctions in Finland: a system in transition’, in , Scandinavian Studies in Law 1977, vol. 21, pp. 121–57.(1985) ‘Current trends in criminal policy in the Scandinavian countries’, in N.Bishop (ed.), Scandinavian Criminal Policy and Criminology 1980–85, Stockholm: Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology, pp. 59–72.(1989) ‘On Finnish and Scandinavian criminal policy’, Cahiers de Défense Sociale, 1989: 64–73.(2002) ‘When colour is an issue’, Howard League Magazine, vol. 20 no. 1, February 2002: 14.(1992) ‘Penal policy and sentencing theory in Finland’, in R.Lahti et al. (eds), Criminal Policy and Sentencing in Transition: Finnish and Comparative Perspectives. Helsinki: Department of Criminal Law and Judicial Procedure, pp. 3–47.(2001) ‘Sentencing and punishment in Finland: the decline of the repressive ideal’, in Tonry and Frase (2001) pp. 92–150.(2002) ‘Proportionality and other values in the Finnish sentencing system’, in P.Asp, C.E.Herlitz and L.Holmqvist (eds), Flores Juris et Legum: Festskrift till Nils Jareborg. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag, pp. 401–28.([Page 357]1996) Census of Prison Inmates 1995. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.(1987) The End of Organised Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.and (1994) Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.and (1998) Réponses a la délinquance de mineurs, rapport au Premier Ministre, Paris: La documentation françhise.and (1995) ‘The normalization of Swedish prisons’, in Ruggiero et al. (1995), pp. 169–93.(1965) The State and Revolution,(2nd revised edn.Moscow: Progress.2001) ‘Japan cracks down on youth crime’. BBC News Asia internet archive service, 1 March 2001.(1992) ‘An international perspective on the privatization of corrections’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 31: 174–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1992.tb00740.xand (1940) ‘The normative, the legal and the law-jobs: the problem of juristic method’, 49Yale Law Journal, 1355–1400. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/792545(Lockyer, A. and Stone, F.H. (eds) (1998) Juvenile Justice in Scotland: Twenty-Five Years of the Welfare Approach. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.2002) The prison privatization research site. Available online at: http://www.ucc.uconn.edu/~logan/(1985) ‘Punishment for profit: the emergence of private enterprise prisons’, Justice Quarterly, 2: 303–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418828500088581and (1973) Individualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(2001) ‘The deprivation of liberty of children in South Africa’. Conference paper presented at the second world conference on the Investigation of Crime at Durban, South Africa, on 2–7 December 2001. Also available online at: http://www.tsa.ac.za/conf/papers/luyt.pdf(1981) A History of English Prison Administration, Volume 1, 1760–1877. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(2004) ‘Capital questions’, The Guardian, 12 October 2004.(1994) ‘Public imprisonment by private means: the re-emergence of private prisons and jails in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.’British Journal of Criminology, 34: 29–48.(1998) Private Prisons in the United States: An Assessment of Current Practice. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., and (1998) Restorative Policing Experiment: The Bethlehem Pennsylvania Police Family Group Conferencing Project. Pipersville, PA: Community Service Foundation.and (2001) Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America: France. Helsinki: HEUNI. Also available online at: http://www.heuni.fi/uploads/fq98onbf0fojy.pdf(1994) ‘Boot camps: a national assessment’, Overcrowded Times, vol. 5, no. 4, Aug.(1992) The Persistent Prison? Rethinking Decarceration and Penal Reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.(1996) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1995. Bureau of Judicial Statistics, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC: USGPO.and (Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds) (2002) Oxford Handbook of Criminology,3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.2002) ‘Government report: crimes peaking and prisons overflowing’, Mainichi Interactive News, 26 November 2001. Available online at: http://mdn.mainichi.co.jp/news/archive/200111/16/20011116p2a00m0dm00900c.html. ([Page 358]2003) ‘Finnish juvenile criminal justice’, reproduced in j.Francis and B.Whyte (eds) Collection of Symposia Papers on European Youth Involved in Public Care and Youth Justice Systems, Annex 7, as part of the ENSA Youth Project. Available online at: http://www.ensayouth.cjsw.ac.uk(2002) Juvenile Punishment 1997–2001: Evaluation of a New Punishment. Helsinki: The National Research Institute of Legal Policy, Publication no. 192. A summary in English is also available online at: http://www.om.fi/optula/15811.htmand (1977) Selected Writings, ed. D.McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2004) ‘Death penalty and the media’, Japan Focus. Available online at: http://japanfocus.org/article.asp?id=161(1998) ‘Reintegrative shaming in theory and practice: thinking about feeling in criminology’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, UK.(2003) ‘Juvenile justice and social policy in Italy’, in J.Francis and B.Whyte (eds), Collection of Symposia Papers on European Youth Involved in Public Care and Youth Justice Systems, Annex 7, as part of the ENSA Youth Project. Available online at: http://www.ensayouth.cjsw.ac.uk(1990) Comparative Policing Issues: The British and American Systems in International Perspective’. London: Unwin Hyman.(1996) ‘Research on family group conferences with young offenders in New Zealand’, in J.Hudson and G.Maxwell (eds), Family Group Conferences: Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Leichhardt: The Federation Press (Australasian Studies in Criminology), pp. 88–110.and (2002) Police Youth Diversion: Final Report. Wellington: Crime and Justice Research Centre., and (2003) Achieving Effective Outcomes in Youth Justice Research Projects: Final Report. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development., , , and (1994) Findings from the International Crime Survey. Home Office Research Findings No. 8. London: Home Office.(1997) Criminal Victimisation in Eleven Industrialised Countries: Key Findings from the 1996 International Crime Victimisation Survey. The Hague: Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice.and (2002) ‘Cross-national attitudes to punishment’, in Roberts and Hough (2002), pp. 63–92.and (1997) The 1996 International Crime Victimisation Survey. Home Office Research Findings No. 57. London: Home Office.and (1995) ‘Germany: the penal system between past and future’, in Ruggiero et al. (1995), pp. 128–48.and (2001) An International Review of Restorative Justice. Crime Reduction Research Series, Paper 10. London: Home Office.(Ministère de la Justice (2003) Les Chiffres-Clés de la Justice. Octobre 2003. Paris: Ministère de la Justice. Also available online at: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/chiffres/chiffres.htmMinistere de la Justice (2004) Les Chiffres Clés de la Justice, Octobre 2004. Paris: Ministère de la Justice. Also available online at: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/chiffres/chiffrescles2004.pdfMinisterie van Justitie van Nederlands (1988) Van Gedeelde Naar Verdeelde Verantvooordelykheid: Rapportage Inzake de Mogelykheden van Deconcentratie en Privatisering by de Addeling Arbeid van de Directie Genvangeniswezen. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Ministerie van Justitie van Nederlands (2002) Naar een Veiliger Samenleving. The Hague: Ministry of Justice/Ministry of Home Affairs.[Page 359]Ministero di Giustizia (2003) Flussi di Utenza dei Servizi della Giustizia Minorile—Anno 2003. Also available online at: http://www.giustizia.it/statistiche/statistiche_dgm/analisi_statistiche/Flussi2003.htmMinistry of Justice (1985) Samenleving en Criminaliteit (Society and Crime). The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Ministry of Justice, (1991) Annual Report of Statistics on Corrections, Vol 1. Tokyo: Corrections Bureau.Ministry of Justice (1998) The Use of Imprisonment in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.1999) Globalization and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.(1992) Policing in Japan: A Study on Making Crime. Translated by and . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.(1996) A Study on Victims of Crime. Tokyo: Seibundo., and (2003) ‘The use of privatized detention centres for asylum seekers in Australia and the UK’. Chapter 11 in Coyle et al. (2003).and (2002) ‘Juvenile justice in Japan: a historical and cross-cultural perspective’, in M.K.Rosenheim, F.E.Zimring, D.S.Tanenhaus and B.Dohrn (eds), A Century of Juvenile Justice. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, Chapter 13.(1989) ‘Informal mechanism of crime control in Japan’, Takushoku University Journal, Vol. 178: 17–37.(1992) ‘Japan’ in G.R.Newman, (ed.), World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems. Available online at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/wfbcjjap.txt(1995) ‘The structure of social control in Japan: why do we enjoy a low crime rate?’, in R.Jakob, M.Usteri and R.Weimar (eds), Psyche, Recht, Gesellschaft: Widmungsschrift für Manfred Rehbinder. Bern: Verlag Stämpfli + Cie, AG, pp. 47–66.(2004) ‘Youth justice in New Zealand’, in M.Tonry and A.N.Doob (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 243–92.(1980) Justice for Children. London: Macmillan., , and (1974) The Future of Imprisonment. London: University of Chicago Press.(1997) Juvenile Crime and Justice. Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series No. 11. Also available online at: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/11/index.html, and (1999) ‘Institutionalized intolerance: youth justice and the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act’. Critical Social Policy, 19: 147–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026101839901900202(2002) ‘Modes of youth governance: political rationalities, criminalization and resistance’, in J.Muncie, G.Hughes and E.McLaughlin (eds), Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage, Chapter 1.and (Muncie, J. and Sparks, R. (eds) (1991) Imprisonment: European Perspectives. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.2003) Children in Conflict with the Law: A Compendium of Child Justice Statistics 1995–2001. Cape Town: NICRO. Also available online at: http://www.childjustice.org.za/research.htm(1997) NICRO Diversion Options. Cape Town: NICRO. Also available online at: http://www.nicro.org.za/articles-DiversionOptions.PDFand (1992) ‘Postwar trends in the administration of Japanese criminal justice: lenient but intolerant or something else?’, Journal of the Japan-Netherlands Institute, 4: 221–56.([Page 360]1979) Retribution, Justice and Therapy: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. London: D. Reidel Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9461-4(1997) ‘The ruthless truth: prison works’, Sunday Times, 12 January 1997.(NACRO, (1995) ‘Life sentence prisoners’, National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders Briefing Papers.NACRO (1999) Contrasting Judgements: Report on Two International Sentencing Seminars. London: NACRO.1994) ‘Trends in juvenile justice’, in D.Chappell and P.Wilson (eds), The Australian Criminal Justice System: The Mid-1990s. Sydney: Butterworths, Chapter 11.and (1999) ‘A comparative overview of the Japanese and American juvenile justice systems’. Available online at: http://www.nichibei.org/je/nagel.html(1978) Report of the Royal Commission into NSW Prisons. Sydney: NSWGPS.(2003a) ‘Prison privatization in the United Kingdom’, in Coyle et al. (2003), Chapter 14.(2003b) ‘Prison privatisation’. Seminar held on 26 August 2003 at the Vineyard Hotel, Cape Town.(2004) ‘Globalisation and private prisons’, Howard League Magazine, 22: 7–8.(National Police Agency (n.d.)‘Overviews of the system of suspect detention’. Available on-line at: http://www.npa.go.jp/ryuchi/Eseido1.htmlNational Swedish Council for Crime Prevention (1977) Nytt Straffsystem: Idéer och Förslag. Rapport 1977: 7. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet.2000) ‘VOM trial in Sweden provides opportunity for progam support and evaluation’, VOMA Newsletter Volume 7, pp. 9–10. Also available online at: http://www.voma.org/docs/connect7.pdf(2002) ‘Comparing criminal justice’, in Maguire et al. (2002), pp. 175–202.(Netherlands Ministry of Justice (2000) Inflow into Juvenile Judicial Institutions. Available online at: http://www.minjust.nl:8080/a_beleid/thema/jeugd/jcp/stats/dji/table/tab_001.htmNetherlands Ministry of Justice (2001a) HALT-diversion Statistics. Available online at: http://www.minjust.nl:8080/a_beleid/thema/jeugd/jcp/def_jcp.htmNetherlands Ministry of Justice (2001b) Alternative Sanctions for Juveniles. Available online at: http://www.minjust.nl:8080/a_beleid/thema/jeugd/jcp/stats/kinderbs/table/tab_001.htmNew Zealand Department of Corrections (1999) Census of Prison Inmates, Time Series Data. Also available online at: http://www.corrections.govt.nz/publications/index.asp?parent_id=574New Zealand Department of Corrections (2003) Census of Prison Inmates and Home Detainees 2001. New Zealand Dept. of Corrections. Also available online at: http://www.corrections.govt.nz/public/pdf/research/census/census2001.pdf2002) The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System: Final Report. Home Office Research Study no. 242. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hors242.pdf, , , , , , , , , and (1998) ‘Models of juvenile justice’ in C.Alder (ed.), Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice. Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series, No. 14.(1997) ‘Stopping crime spreading’, New Economy, 4: 83–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0041.1997.tb00178.x(1990) Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Penguin Books.([Page 361]1969) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.(2004) ‘The Politics of Discontent: The Emergence of a New Criminal Justice Discourse in the Netherlands’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 284–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00328.x(1990) ‘Class context and pension response to demographic structure in advanced industrial democracies’, Social Problems, 37: 535–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800580, and (1994) ‘The new penology and politics in crisis: the Italian case’, British Journal of Criminology, 34, Special Issue: 49–61.(2001) ‘Italy—the politics of punishment: the death of prison reform in Italy’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 400–24.(1999) ‘Corrections in the balance: a review of corrective services in Queensland, January 1999. Queensland Corrective Service Review, Level 15, 215 Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia. Also available online at: http://www.qcsc.qld.gov.au/globals/what'snew/corrserv.pdf(1982) ‘Prison sentences and population: a comparison of some European countries’, Justice of the Peace, 146: 575–9.(1991) ‘Talk at the Annual General Meeting of the British Society of Criminology’. Unpublished paper.(1992) ‘Punitiveness and prison populations: an international comparison’, Justice of the Peace, 156: 405–8.(1994) ‘Cross-national imprisonment rates: limitations of method and possible conclusions’, British Journal of Criminology, 34, Special Issue: 116–30.(Penal Affairs Consortium (1999) The Prison System: Regime and Population Trends. London: Penal Affairs Consortium.2000) ‘A Fresh Look at The Japanese Welfare State’, Social Policy and Administration, 34: 87–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00179(1988) ‘Main currents in criminal law theory’, in J.van Dijk, CHaffmans, F.Rüter, J.Schutte and S.Stolwijk (eds), Criminal Law in Action: An Overview of Current Issues in Western Societies. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.(1992) ‘Some comparative observations on the criminal process in Holland and Japan’, Journal of the Japan-Netherlands Institute, 4: 247–94.(1996) ‘Freiheitsentziehende Maßnahmen gegenüber Minder-hährigen und Jugenstrafvollzug in Italien’, in F.Dünkel and K.Meyer (eds), Jugenstrafe und Jugenstrafvollzug vol. 2. Freiburg: Eigenverlag des Max-Planck-Instituts Eür ausländisches and internationales Strafrecht, pp. 905–96.and (1998) ‘Freedom next time’, The Guardian Weekend, 11 April 1998.(2001) ‘Korrectional karaoke: New Labour and the zombification of youth justice’. Youth Justice, 1(2): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147322540100100202(1977) The Child Savers,(2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1990) ‘The privatization of prisons in the United States: a policy that Britain should not emulate’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 29: 65–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1990.tb00670.x(1987) ‘Dilemmas of the alternative to custody concept: implications for New Zealand penal policy in the light of international evidence and experience’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20: 148–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000486588702000303(1992) Punishment in a Perfect Society: the New Zealand Penal System 1840–1939. Wellington: Victoria University Press(2000a) ‘The return of the wheelbarrow men: or, the arrival of postmodern penality’, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 127–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/40.1.127([Page 362]2000b) ‘Emotive and ostentatious punishment: its decline and resurgence in modern society’, Punishment & Society, 2: 417–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740022228088(2004) ‘Penal populism in New Zealand’. Unpublished paper.and (Prison Reform Trust (2004) Prison Reform Trust Factfile. July 2004. Available online at: http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk1968) Imprisonment in Medieval England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(2003) ‘Delinquency cases waived to Criminal Court, 1990–1999. Available online from the OJJDP web-site at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ojjdp(2003) Juvenile Court Statistics 1999. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention., , , and (1979) ‘A voice for children in statistical and social accounting: a plea for children's rights to be heard’, in A.James and A.Prout (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. London: Falmer.(1999) ‘Why is the Japanese conviction rate so high?’ Available online at: http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/le/papers/9907/9907001.pdfand (1995) ‘Community based corrections: an integral part of the Victorian penal system (Australia)’. Paper presented to the Socio-Legal Studies Association, University of Leeds, 27–29 March 1995.(1972) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(Research and Training Institute (1993) Summary of the White Paper on Crime:Tokyo: Ministry of Justice.1992) Entre l'Ordre et la Liberté: La Détention Provisoire. Deux Siècles de Débats. Paris: L'Harmattan.(Roberts, J.V. and Hough, M. (eds) (2002) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton: Willan.1997) The Law of Children and Young Persons in South Africa. Durban: Butterworths.(1989) Prison Review: Te Ara Hou—The New Way. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministerial Inquiry into the Prisons System.(2004) ‘Privatisation of prisons’, Background Paper No. 3/04 produced for the New South Wales Parliament. Available online at: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/(Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991) National Report. Canberra: AGPS.1995) ‘Flexibility and intermittent emergency in the Italian penal system’, in Ruggiero et al. (1995), pp. 46–70.(1998) ‘The country of Cesare Beccaria: the myth of rehabilitation in Italy’, in Weiss and South (1998), pp. 207–32.(Ruggiero, V., Ryan, M. and Sim, J. (eds) (1995) Western European Penal Systems: A Critical Anatomy. London: Sage Publications.1939) Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Columbia University Press.and (1986) Prisons and the Process of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1992) Growing Out of Crime: The New Era. Winchester: Waterside Press.(1996) Transforming Criminal Policy: Spheres of Influence in the United States, The Netherlands and England and Wales during the 1980s. Winchester: Waterside Press.(1989) Privatization and the Penal System: The American Experience and the Debate in Britain. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.and ([Page 363]2002) ‘Victim participation in an exclusionary criminal justice system’, in C.Hoyle and R.Young (eds), New Visions of Crime Victims. Oxford: Hart Publishing, Chapter 8.(1996) ‘Honouring the individual’, in T.Rohlen and G.LeTendre (eds), Teaching and Learning in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1994) ‘Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment’, American Journal of Sociology, 99: 911–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230367(1999) ‘Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment revisited: incorporating state socialism’, Punishment and Society, 1: 45–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227702(2002) ‘Restorative conferencing for juveniles in the United States: prevalence, process and practice’, in E.G.M.Weitekamp and H.-J.Kerner, (eds), Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, Chapter 9.and (2000) ‘South Africa's position in Africa's crime rankings’, African Security Review, Vol. 9 No 4. Available online at: http://www.iss.co.za/Pubs/ASR/9No4/Schonteich.html.(Scottish Executive (2002) Executive's Youth Crime Review: Report and Statement on Recommendations. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Scottish Executive (2004) Prison Statistics, Scotland 2003. Statistical Bulletin. Criminal Justice Series CrJ/2004/6. August 2004. Also available online at: http://www.Scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/00356-00.aspScottish Prison Service (2001) Annual Report and Accounts 2000–2001, SE/2001/280. Available online at: http://www.sps.gov.uk/keydocs/2000-2001/default.aspScottish Prison Service (2003) Annual Report and Accounts 2002–2003, SE/2003/190. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office. Also available online at: http://www.sps.gov.uk/reports/2002-2003/default.asp1993) The History and Politics of Private Prisons. A Comparative Analysis. Cranbury: Associated University Press.(‘Juvenile crime’. Foreign Press Centre, Japan. Available online at: http://www.fpcj.jp/e/shiryo/jc/jc.html(n.d.)1997) ‘The quest for juvenile justice’ in L.M.Muntingh and Shapiro (eds) (1997) NICRO Diversion Options. Cape Town: NICRO.(1966) Convicts and the Colonies. London: Faber.(1994) ‘Participatory policing: modalities for lay participation’, Imbizo, 2: 5–10.(1995) ‘Serious and habitual juvenile offender statutes: reconciling punishment and rehabilitation within the juvenile justice system’Vanderbilt Law Review, 48: 479–506.(2000) Recidivism Patterns in the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) (Final Report), Canberra: ANU. Also available online at: http://www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/recidivism/index.html, and (1995) Punishment for Profit: Private Prisons/Public Concerns. London: Sage.(1972) ‘The rehabilitative programmes in the adult prisons in Japan’International Review of Criminal Policy30: 11–19.(1992) Crime and Criminal Policy in Japan: Analysis and Evaluation of the Showa Era, 1926–1988. New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2816-5and (1999) ‘States with statutory exclusion, 1997’, adapted from and State Legislative Responses to Violent Juvenile Crime: 1996–7 Update. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1998. OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Available Online at: http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/html/qa087.html. 1 July 1999.(2000) Offenders in Juvenile Court, 1997. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Also available online at: http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/pubs/court.html#OJC([Page 364]2004) Juveniles in Corrections. Washington: US Department of Justice. Also available from the OJJDP website at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ojjdp(2004) ‘Census of juveniles in residential placement databook’. Available online at: http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/cjrp/, and (1995) ‘Punishment in Europe: perceptions and commonalities’, in Ruggiero et al. (1995), pp. 1–23., and (Simmons, J. and Dodd, T. (eds) (2003) Crime in England and Wales 2002/2003, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 07/03. London: Home Office.1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1995) “True Crime: The New Penology and Public Discourse on Crime’, in T.Blomberg and S.Cohen (eds), Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honour of Sheldon Messinger. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, pp. 147–80.and (2001) ‘Minimum sentences for juveniles cut down to size’, Available online at: http://www.sn.ape.org/users/clc/children/minimum%20sentences2.doc(2003) ‘Statistics on children under 14 years of age in prison’, Article 40: the Dynamics of Youth Justice and the Convention on the Rights of the Child in South Africa. Vol. 5 (no. 1) March, 2003.(2001) Juvenile Justice Review 1999–2000. Available online at: http://www.sn.apc.org/users/clc/children/jjreview9900.docand (1999) Juvenile Offenders and Victims: A National Report. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.and (Socialstyrelsen (National Board of Health and Welfare) (2000) Social Services in Sweden 1999: Needs, Interventions, Development. Stockholm: SOS.2002) ‘Juristiche Voraussetzungen des Umgangs mit Kinderdelinquenz’DVJJ-Journal, vol. 13: 326–31.(South African Law Commission (1997) Juvenile Justice. Issue Paper 9, Project 106. Pretoria: South African Law Commission.South African Law Commission (2000) Report on Juvenile Justice, Project 106. Pretoria: South African Law Commission. Also available online at: http://wwwserver.law.wits.ac.za/salc/report/project106.htmlSouth African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1998) The Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Available Online at: http://www.truth.org.za/final/execsum.html.1993) Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand, 1983–92. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.and (1981–2) ‘The effect of race on sentencing: a re-examination of an unsettled question’, Law and Society Review, 16: 71–88., and (2004) ‘A study of prosecutorial certification practice in Virginia’. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(4): 605–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00067.x, and (1985) Child Welfare and Social Defence. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.(1997) ‘South African white whine leaves sour taste’, The Guardian, 29 March 1997.(Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth State Services (1997) Reforms in Government Services 1997. Melbourne: Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision/Productivity Commission. Also available online at: http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/studies/case/case.pdf (Accessed 23 September 2003).1989) Prison Rule Violators, BJS Special Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.(1987) Bricks of Shame: Britain's Prisons. London: Penguin.(1998) A Sin Against the Future: Imprisonment in the World. London: Penguin.([Page 365]1997) ‘“Three strikes and you're out”. The impact of California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates’, Crime and Delinquency, 43: 457–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128797043004004and (1999) Experiments in Restorative Policing: A Progress Report on the Canberra Reintegrate Shaming Experiments (RISE), Australian Federal Police and Australian National University, Canberra. Also available online at: http://www.aic.gove.au/rjustice/rise/progress/1999.html, , and (Strategos Consulting Limited (1989) Department of Justice Management Review. Wellington, New Zealand: Strategos Consulting Limited.1987) Death Penalty for Juveniles. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.(Supreme Court of Japan (2000) Annual Report of Judicial Statistics, Criminal Cases. Available online at: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/zuhyou/b2313000.xls1980) Stubborn Children: Controlling Delinquents in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.(Swedish Committee on Juvenile Delinquency (Ungdomsbrottskommitten) (1993) Betänkande angående Reaktion mot ungdomsbrottskommitten (Sanctions against juvenile crime), Report 1993: 35. Malmö: SOU.Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (BRÅ) (2000) The Sanction System for Young Offenders (English summary). Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. Also available online at: http://www.bra.se/dynamaster/publication/pdf_archive/00062217714.pdfSwedish Prison Administration (2004) Kriminalvård och Statistik 2003. Swedish Prison Administration: Stockholm.1990) The Japanese Welfare State: Its Structure and Transformation. Tokyo: University of Tokyo, Institute of Social Science.(1998) ‘Changes in sentencing in the Netherlands 1970–1995’. Paper presented to conference at University of Minnesota Law School, May 1–3, 1998. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.(1998) ‘Prison population growing faster in the Netherlands than in US’, Overcrowded Times, (9) 3: 1, 12–16.and (2002) ‘The evolution of juvenile courts in the early twentieth century: beyond the myth of immaculate construction’, in M.K.Rosenheim, F.E.Zimring, D.S.Tanenhaus and B.Dohrn (eds), A Century of Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chapter 2.(2004) Juvenile Justice in the Making. New York: Oxford University Press.(1991) Mea Culpa: a Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford U.P.(1998) ‘Sentencing in South Africa’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1998), pp. 172–7.(1992) World Criminal Justice Systems: A Survey,(2nd edn.Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.1999) World Criminal Justice Systems,(4th edn.Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.1995) ‘From treatment to just deserts in a changing welfare state’, in A.Snare (ed.), Beware of Punishment, Scandinavian Studies in Criminology vol. 14. Oslo: Pax Forlag, pp. 89–122.(1996) ‘On the background and causes of juvenile criminality in Sweden’. Lecture given at the ELSA Workshop, Lund, April 1996.([Page 366]1998) ‘Crime and the welfare state: the case of the United Kingdom and Sweden’, in V.Ruggiero, N.South and I.Taylor (eds), New European Criminology: Crime and Social Order in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 368–94.(1993) ‘The development, present status and future potential of correctional privatization in America’, in G.W.Bowman, S.Hakim and P.Seidenstat (eds), Privatizing Correctional Institutions. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 213–40.and (1997) Private Adult Correctional Facility Census,, and (10th edn.Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, Private Corrections Project.1997) ‘Sentencing and punishment in New Zealand, 1981–1993’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1997), pp. 163–8.(1980) Out of Care: The Community Support of Juvenile Offenders. London: Allen and Unwin., , and (2004) Thinking About Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(Tonry, M. and Fräse, R.S. (eds) (2001) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Tonry, M. and Hatlestad, K. (eds) (1997) Sentencing Reform in Overcrowded Times: A Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.1998) State Legislative Responses to Violent Juvenile Crime: 1996–97 Update. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.and (1996) State Responses to Serious and Violent Juvenile Crime: Research Report. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, National Centre for Juvenile Justice., , , , and (1993) Fifteen Years of Decreasing Prisoner Rates in Finland. Helsinki: Oikeuspolittinen Tlitkimuslaitos.(1997) ‘15 years of decreasing prisoner rates in Finland’, in HEUNI (1997) Prison Population in Europe and in North America: Problems and Solutions. Helsinki: Ministry of Justice, pp. 245–68.(1998) National Survey of Victim Offender Mediation Programs in the US. University of Minnesota: Center for Restorative Justice and Peacemaking.and (UNAFEI (2000) Criminal Justice in Japan. Available online at: http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/publications/criminal_justice.htmlUnited Nations General Assembly (1985) United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (‘The Beijing Rules’). Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/33 of 29 November 1985. Also available online at: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp48.htmUnited Nations General Assembly (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child. Document A/RES/44/25 (12 December 1989). Also available online at: http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/UN-convention/United Nations Human Rights Committee (2002) Concluding Observations on New Zealand. CCPR/CO/75/NZL. 7 August 2002. Also available Online at: http://www.hri.ca/forthere-cord2002/documentation/tbodies/ccpr-co-75-nzl.htm (Accessed 2 October 2003).United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2004) The Seventh United Nations Survey on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (1998–2000). Available online at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/crime_cicp_survey_seventh.htmlUSA Today (2003) ‘Growing prison populations challenge already cash-strapped states’, USA Today, 27 July 2003.[Page 367]US Bureau of Justice (2003) Statistics Bulletin, April 2003. NCJ 1988877.US Bureau of Justice (2004) Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2003, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, US. Also available online at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.govUSDOJ (2002) United States Department of Justice Performance Report 2002. Available Online at: http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/annualreports/pr2000/NEWSG5.htm (Accessed 13 November 2003).1994) Prison Systems: A Comparative Study of Accountability in England, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Oxford: Clarendon Press.(1988) ‘Innovations in the Dutch juvenile justice system: alternative sanctions’, in and , Juvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications, pp. 203–39.(2003a) ‘Police and judicial reactions to youth crime—the situation in the Netherlands’, in F.Dünkel (ed.), Youth Violence: New Patterns and Local Responses—Experiences in East and West, Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg, pp. 78–85.(1998) The Dutch Miracle: Managed Liberalisation of the Dutch Welfare State: A Review and Analysis of the the Reform of the Dutch Social Security System 1985–97. London: IPPR Publications.and (1992) Criminal Victimization in the Industrialized World: Key Findings of the 1989 and 1992 International Crime Surveys. The Hague: Directorate for Crime Prevention, Ministry of Justice.and (1996) Prison Health Care in South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.(1988) Sanctions-Systems in the Member States of the Council of Europe. Deventer: Kluwer.and (1995) ‘The Dutch prison system and penal policy in the 1990s: from humanitarian paternalism to penal business management’, in Ruggiero et al. (1995), pp. 24–45.and (1996) ‘Some features of correctional reform in South Africa’. Unpublished paper.(1998) ‘Change and continuity in South African prisons’, in Weiss and South (1998), pp. 401–26.(1999) ‘Criminological ideas and the South African transition’, British Journal of Criminology, 39: 198–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/39.2.198(2000) ‘Mandatory sentences: a conundrum for the New South Africa?’, Punishment & Society, 2: 197–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740022227953(2001a) ‘South Africa’, in van Zyl Smit. and Dünkel (2001), pp. 589–608.(2001b) ‘Tough justice: South African style?’, in and (2001), Victim Policies and Criminal Justice on the Road to Restorative Justice: Essays in Honour of Tony Peters. Leuven: Leuven University Press.(2004) ‘Swimming against the tide’, in B.Dixon and E.van der Spuy (eds), Justice Gained? Crime and Crime Control in South Africa's Transition. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 227–58.(van Zyl Smit, D. and Dünkel, F. (eds) (1991) Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow: International Perspectives on Prisoners' Rights and Prison Conditions,1st edn.Deventer: Kluwer Law International.van Zyl Smit, D. and Dünkel, F. (eds) (2001) Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow: International Perspectives on Prisoners' Rights and Prison Conditions,2nd edn.The Hague: Kluwer Law International.2004) ‘“Importing criminological ideas in a new democracy: recent South African experiences’”, in T.Newburn and R.Sparks (eds), Criminal Justice and Political Cultures. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 184–233.and ([Page 368]2000) Médecin-chef à la Prison de la Santé. Paris: La Cherche Midi.(Victorian Sentencing Committee (Starke Committee) (1989) Sentencing: Report of the Victorian Sentencing Committee. Melbourne: Attorney-General's Department.1976) Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments (Report of the Committee for the Study of Incarceration). New York: Hill and Wang.(1993) Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.(2000) ‘Electronic monitoring of offenders in Sweden’. Unpublished paper.(2001) ‘Crime and punishment in Scandinavia: an overview’, in Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology, Social Change and Crime in Scandinavian and Baltic Region. Copenhagen: Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology, pp. 35–49.(2002) ‘Prison population and prison policy in Holland’. Unpublished paper.(2003a) ‘Entwicklunstendenzen und Reformstrategien im Schwedischen Jugendstraf recht’. Available online at: http://www.crim.su.se/downloads/SCHWED2.PDF(2003b) ‘Prison populations as political constructs: the case of Finland, Holland and Sweden’, Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 4: 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14043850310009921(2004) ‘“Die dummen Schweden” oder Warum steigen die Gefangenenzahlen in Schweden?’. Unpublished paper.(2001) ‘Swedish prisons’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 653–75.and (1997) ‘Minorities, crime, and criminal justice in Sweden’, in I.H.Marshall (ed.), Minorities, Migrants and Crime: Diversity and Similarity Across Europe and the United States, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 62–85., and (1986) ‘The implications of apology: law and culture in Japan and the United States’. Law and Society Review, 20: 461–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053463and (2004) ‘Restoration in Youth Justice’, in M.Tonry and A. N.Doob (eds), Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 31. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 543–97.(1994) ‘User-friendly prisoner forecasting’, Criminology Australia, Jan/Feb., 21.(1990) ‘Why are prison rates in England and Wales higher than in Australia?’, British Journal of Criminology, 30: 24–35., and (1997) Prison Populations in Europe and North America: Some Background Information, HEUNI Paper no. 10. Helsinki: HEUNI.(1999) World Prison Population List. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate Research Findings no. 88. London: HMSO. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/rfpubs1.html(2000) World Prison Population List,(2nd edn.Home Office Walmsley, R. (2001) ‘World prison populations: an attempt at a complete list’, in van Zyl Smit and Dünkel (2001), pp. 775–95.2002) World Prison Population List,(3rd edn.Home Office Research Findings 166. London: Home Office. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/rfpubsl.html2003a) World Prison Population List,(4th edn.Home Office Research Findings 188. London: Home Office. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/rfpubsl.html2003b) World Prison Population List,(5th edn.Home Office Research Findings 234. London: Home Office. Also available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/rfpubsl.html2003) A History of Youth Justice in New Zealand. Available online at: http://www.justice.govt.nz/youth/history/([Page 369]1968) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.(1997) ‘Germany reduces use of prison sentences’, in Tonry and Hatlestad (1997), pp. 177–81.(2002) ‘The youth court: its justification and its requirements’. Conference paper presented at the second international conference on Sentencing and Society, Glasgow, June 2002.(Weiss, R.P. and South, N. (eds) (1998) Comparing Prison Systems: Toward a Comparative and International Penology. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.1998) ‘Germany’, in Mehlbye and L.Walgrave (eds), Confronting Youth in Europe: Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice. Copenhagen: AFK Forlaget, Chapter 7., and (1982) Delinquency: Its Roots, Careers and Prospects. London: Heinemann.(1999) ‘How unregulated is the US labor market? The penal system as labor market institution’, American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1030–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210135and (1998) Revised Predictions of Long Term Trends in the Prison Population to 2005, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 2/98. London: Home Office.and (1999) Projections of Long Term Trends in the Prison Population to 2006, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 1/99. London: Home Office., and (1987) The Myth of a Racist Criminal Justice System. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing.(1987) ‘Public demand for punishment’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 7: 16–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb014252and (1996) ‘Cost-Effective Ideas in Penology: The Minnesota Approach’, Corrections Today, 58: 52–6.(2003) ‘The rise of the prison industrial complex in the United States’, Chapter 1 in Coyle et al. (2003).(1991) Prison Disturbances April 1990, Cm. 1456. London: HMSO.and (1994) ‘Family conferencing and juvenile justice reform in South Australia’, in C.Alder and J.Wundersitz (eds), Family Conferencing and Juvenile Justice: The Way Forward or Misplaced Confidence?Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, Chapter 4.(1996) The South Australian Juvenile Justice System: A Review of its Operation. Adelaide, South Australia: Office of Criminal Statistics.(1995) Social Security in Japan. Tokyo: Foreign Press Centre.and (2000) ‘Confession, apology, repentance and settlement out-of-court in the Japanese criminal justice system: is Japan a model of “restorative justice”’? Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Restorative Justice for Juveniles, Tübingen, Germany, 1–4 October 2000.(2001) ‘The future of the Japanese criminal justice system: from retributive-deterrent-oriented criminal justice towards restorative justice’. Paper presented at the fifth International Conference on Restorative Justice for Juveniles, Leuven, Belgium, 16–19 September 2001.(1986) ‘Influences upon the use of imprisonment: a review of the literature’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 25: 125–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1986.tb00551.x(1993) ‘Cross-national comparisons of imprisonment’, in M.Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 17: 1–49. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.and (1998) ‘Mandela's OK, but he's no John Pilger’, The Guardian, 22 April 1998.([Page 370]Youth Justice Board (2001) ‘Curb short term custody—end justice by geography’. Press release, 9 October, 2001. Youth Justice Board.Youth Justice Board (2004) Youth Justice Annual Statistics 2003/2004. London: Youth Justice Board. Also available online at: http://www.youth-justice-board.gov.uk/Publications/Downloads/Annual%20Statistics%200304%20Full.pdf1996) ‘Journeys to nowhere: moving children from juvenile courts to children's courts’; in J.Sloth-Nielsen (ed.), South African Juvenile Justice: Law Practice and Policy. Unpublished. Cape Town: Community Law Centre, University of Western Cape.and (1991) The Scale of Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.and (2001) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California. Oxford: Oxford University Press., and (