Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis

Books

Edited by: Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Series Information

    INTRODUCING QUALITATIVE METHODS provides a series of volumes which introduce qualitative research to the student and beginning researcher. The approach is interdisciplinary and international. A distinctive feature of these volumes is the helpful student exercises.

    One stream of the series provides texts on the key methodologies used in qualitative research. The other stream contains books on qualitative research for different disciplines or occupations. Both streams cover the basic literature in a clear and accessible style, but also cover the ‘cutting edge’ issues in the area.

    SERIES EDITOR

    David Silverman (Goldsmiths College)

    EDITORIAL BOARD

    Michael Bloor (University of Wales, Cardiff)

    Barbara Czarniawska-Joerges (University of Gothenburg)

    Norman Denzin (University of Illinois, Champaign)

    Barry Glassner (University of Southern California)

    Jaber Gubrium (University of Florida, Gainesville)

    Anne Murcott (South Bank University)

    Jonathan Potter (Loughborough University)

    TITLES IN SERIES

    Doing Conversational Analysis: A Practical Guide

    Paul ten Have

    Using Foucault's Methods

    Gavin Kendall and Gary Wickham

    The Quality of Qualitative Evaluation

    Clive Seale

    Qualitative Evaluation

    Ian Shaw

    Researching Life Stories and Family Histories

    Robert L. Miller

    Categories in Text and Talk: A Practical Introduction to Categorization Analysis

    Georgia Lepper

    Focus Groups in Social Research

    Michael Bloor, Jane Frankland, Michelle Thomas, Kate Robson

    Qualitative Research Through Case Studies

    Max Travers

    Qualitative Social Work Research

    Ian Shaw and Nick Gould

    Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis

    Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Acknowledgements

    This book could not have been written without the help of many people. We wish to express our gratitude to them all.

    In particular, we appreciate the discussion and work with the student participants at our seminar on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) which we organized at the Department of Linguistics of the University of Vienna in the summer of 1999. This panel provided an important stimulus for our plan to publish a book on CDA.

    We appreciate the collaboration with the authors of the contributions to this book: Siegfried Jäger, Teun van Dijk, Norman Fairclough and Ron Scollon. Not only did they write interesting papers, but they submitted them (almost) on schedule, and accepted our criticism and comments with understanding and patience.

    Bryan Jenner has been indispensable in helping to mould our badly structured non-native English in an acceptable form. Michael Carmichael and Lauren McAllister at Sage were very supportive editors who contributed positively to the final result.

    Contributors

    Norman Fairclough is Professor of Language in Social Life at Lancaster University in the UK. He has written extensively on critical discourse analysis. His main publications include: Language and Power (1989), Discourse and Social Change (1992), Media Discourse (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis (1995), Discourse in Late Modernity (1999) (with Lilie Chouliaraki) and New Labour, New Language? (2000). He is currently working on language in new capitalism, an introduction to text and interaction analysis for social researchers, and on the theorization of discourse within critical realism.

    Siegfried Jäger is Professor of German Language at the Gerhard Mercator University in Duisburg, Germany. He is also head of the Institute of Language and Social Research (DISS), a member of the board of the International Association for the Study of Racism (IASR), and a coeditor of Discourse and Society. His main publications are: BrandSätze. Rassismus im Alltag, fourth edn, Duisburg 1996, Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung, second edn, Duisburg 1999. His main areas of research are speech act theory, sociolinguistics, discourse theory and discourse analysis. His research is focused on right-wing extremism, racism, militarism and bio-power.

    Michael Meyer is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Management and Organizational Behaviour at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration. His main areas of research are social systems theory, qualitative methods, and organization theory. His recent research concentrates upon careers and social capital in and between organizations. His main publications are: Methods of Texts and Discourse Analysis (with Stefan Titscher, Ruth Wodak and Eva Vetter, London: Sage 2000), Text und Gegentext (with Stefan Titscher, Soziale Systeme 2 1998).

    Ron Scollon is Professor of Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University in Washington, DC and editor of the journal Visual Communication. His interests include mediated discourse, multimodal discourse, the sociolinguistics of literacy, and the relationships among technologies of communication and sociolinguistic analysis. His two most recent books are Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice and Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (2nd edn) (with Suzanne Scollon).

    Teun A. van Dijk is Professor of Discourse Studies at the University of Amsterdam, and Visiting Professor at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona. After earlier work in literary studies, text grammar and the psychology of text comprehension, his research in the 1980s focused on the study of news in the press and the reproduction of racism through various types of discourse. In each of these domains, he has published several books. His present research in critical discourse studies focuses on the relations between power, discourse and ideology. His latest book is Ideology (Sage, 1998). He founded the international journals TEXT, Discourse and Society and Discourse Studies, and still edits the latter two. He is editor of the four volume Handbook of Discourse Analysis (1985) and of the new two volume Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Sage, 1997). He has lectured widely in Europe and the Americas, and was visiting professor at several universities in Latin America.

    Ruth Wodak is Professor of Applied Linguistics and Discourse Analysis at the Department of Linguistics, University of Vienna and also Research Professor and Director of the Research Centre on Discourse, Politics, Identity at the Austrian Academy of Sciences (http://www.oeaw.ac.at/wittgenstein). She has received many awards including 1996 Wittgenstein Prize for Elite Researchers. She also holds many visiting professorships (Stanford, Minnesota, Georgetown, Uppsala). She is editor of Language and Politics, co-editor of Discourse and Society, editor of the series Diskursforschung (Passagenverlag), Sprache und Kontext (Lang Verlag), Discourse in Politics, Culture and Society (Benjamins). Her areas of research include discourse and politics, methodology in CDA, racism and anti-Semitism, gender, organizational discourse. Recent publications include Racism at the Top, 2000 (with Teun van Dijk), Discursive Construction of National Identity, 1999 (with Rudi de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Karin Liebhart), Disorders of Discourse, 1996, Discourses on Unemployment in the European Union, 2000 (with Peter Muntigl and Gilbert Weiss), Discourse and Discrimination, 2001 (with Martin Reisigl), Gender and Discourse, 1997.

  • References

    Albert, H. (ed.) (1971) Werturteilsstreit. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
    Altheide, D.L. and Johnson, J. (1994) ‘Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 485-99.
    Anthonissen, C. (2001) ‘On the effectiveness of media censorship: linguistic, paralinguistic and other communicative devices of media regulation’. PhD thesis, University of Vienna.
    Atkinson, P. and Coffey, A. (1997) ‘Analysing documentary realities’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 45-62.
    Bailer-Galanda, B. and Neugebauer, W. (1993) ‘Die FPÖ: vom Liberalismus zum Rechtsextremismus’, in DöW: Handbuch des österreichischen Rechtsextremismus. Vienna: Deuticke, pp. 327-428.
    Bailer-Galanda, B. and Neugebauer, W. (1997). Haider und die ‘Freiheitlichen’ in Österreich. Berlin: Elefanten Press.
    Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    Bakker, C. (1997) ‘Membership categorization and interview accounting’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 130-43.
    Balke, F. (1998) ‘Was zu denken zwingt’. Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari und das Aussen der Philosophie, in J. Jurt, (ed.), Zeitgenössische Französische Denker: Eine Bilanz, Freiburg: Rombach Litterae, pp. 187-210.
    Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
    Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalization – The Human Consequence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Becker, F., Gerhard, U. and Link, J. (1997) ‘Moderne Kollektivsymbolik. Ein diskurstheoretisch orientierter Forschungsbericht mit Auswahlbibliographie’, Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur (IASL), 22 (1): 70-154.
    Bellah, R.N. (1973) Emile Durkheim: On Morality and Society, Selected Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Benhabib, S. (1992) Kritik, Norm und Utopie. Die normativen Grundlagen der Kritischen Theorie. Frankfurt: Fischer.
    Benke, G. (2000) ‘Diskursanalyse als sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchungsmethode’, SWS Rundschau, 2: 140-62.
    Bernstein, B. (1990) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263
    Bhaskar, R. (1986) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
    Billig, M. (1991) Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
    Billig, M. and Schegloff, E.A. (1999) ‘Debate: critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis’, Discourse and Society, 10 (4): 543-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004005
    Blommaert, J. and Bulcaen, H. (2000) ‘Critical discourse analysis. An overview’, Annual Anthropological Review (forthcoming).
    Blommaert, J. and Verschueren, J. (1999) The Diversity Debate. London: Routledge.
    Bonss, W. and Honneth, A. (1982) Sozialforschung als Kritik. Zum sozialwissenschaftlichen Potential der Kritischen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Boswood, T. (2000) ‘Strategic writing and organizational identities’. PhD dissertation, City University of Hong Kong.
    Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bourdieu, P. (1979) La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
    Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Bourdieu, P. (1998) ‘A reasoned utopia and economic fatalism’, New Left Review, 227: 25-30.
    Brown, B.M. and Coates, K. (1996) The Blair Revelation: Deliverance for Whom? Nottingham: Spokesman.
    Bublitz, H. (1999) Foucaults Archäologie des kulturellen Unbewussten. Zum Wissensarchiv und Wissensbegehren moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
    Burkhardt, A. (1996) ‘Politolinguistik. Versuch einer Ortsbestimmung’, in J. Klein and H. Diekmannshenke (eds), Sprachstrategien und Dialogblockaden. Linguistische und politikwissenschaftliche Studien zur politischen Kommunikation. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, pp. 75-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110812534.75
    Caborn, J. (1999) ‘Die Presse und die “Hauptstadtdebatte”. Konstrukte der deutschen Einheit’, in U. Kreft, H. Uske and S. Jäger (eds), Kassensturz. Politische Hypotheken der Berliner Republik. Duisburg: DISS, pp. 61-84.
    Calhoun, C. (1995) Critical Social Theory. Culture, History, and the Challenge of Difference. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
    Castells, M. (1998) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 3 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. s-Gravenhage: Mouton.
    Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1998) A Modern British People? New Labour and the Reconstruction of Social Welfare. Department of Intercultural Communication and Management, Copenhagen Business School: Occasional Paper.
    Cleve, G. (1997) ‘Völkisches Denken im Alltag’, in A. Disselnkötter, S. Jäger, H. Kellershohn and S. Slobodzian (eds), Evidenzen im Fluss. Demokratieverluste in Deutschland. Duisburg: DISS, pp. 244-60.
    Connerton, P. (1976) Critical Sociology. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    de Beaugrande, R.A. and Dressler, W.U. (1981) Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    de Saint-Georges, I. (2000a) ‘Discussing images: pictures reception and appropriation in focus groups’. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable, Washington, DC.
    de Saint-Georges, I. (2000b) ‘Discourse, practice, and social change: manual work and discourse practice in a vocational training centre for long-term unemployed’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
    de Saint-Georges, I. and Norris, S. (1999) ‘Nationality and the European Union: competing identities in the visual design of four European cities’. Paper presented at the International Visual Sociology Association Conference, Antwerp, Belgium.
    Deleuze, G. (1992) Foucault. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Denzin, N.K. (1970) The Research Act in Sociology. London: Butterworth.
    Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Department of Trade and Industry (1998) Building the Knowledge-Driven Economy. London: Stationery Office.
    Dieckmann, W. (1964) Information oder Überredung. Zum Wortgebrauch der politischen Werbung in Deutschland seit der Französischen Revolution. Marburg: N.G. Elwert.
    Dieckmann, W. (1975) Sprache in der Politik. Einführung in die Pragmatik und Semantik der politischen Sprache. Mit einem Literaturbericht zur 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    Dieckmann, W. (1981) Politische Sprache – Politische Kommunikation. Vorträge, Aufsätze, Entwürfe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    Disselnkötter, A., Jäger, S., Kellershohn, H. and Slobodzian, S. (eds) (1997) Evidenzen im Fluss. Demokratieverluste in Deutschland. Duisburg: DISS.
    DöW (1993) Handbuch des österreichischen Rechtsextremismus. Vienna: Deuticke.
    Drews, A., Gerhard, U. and Link, J. (1985) ‘Moderne Kollektivsymbolik. Eine diskurstheoretisch orientierte Einführung mit Auswahlbibliographie’, in Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur (IASL),
    1st special edition
    , Tübingen: Forschungsreferate, pp. 256-375.
    Durkheim, E. (1933) The Division of Labour in Society, translated by George Simpson. New York: The Free Press.
    Duveen, G. and Lloyd, B. (eds) (1990) Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659874
    Eagleton, T. (ed.) (1994) Ideology. London: Longman.
    Eco, U. (1985) Lector in fabula: la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi. Milano: Bompiani.
    Edwards, D. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
    Ehlich, K. (1983) ‘Text und sprachliches Handeln. Die Entstehung von Texten aus dem Bedürfnis nach Überlieferung’, in: A. Assmann, J. Assmann and C. Hardmeier (eds), Schrift und Gedächtnis. Beiträge zur Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation. Munich: Fink, pp. 24-43.
    Fairclough, N. (1985) ‘Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis’, Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 739-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2885%2990002-5
    Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
    Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Polity Press and Blackwell.
    Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
    Fairclough, N. (1996) ‘A reply to Henry Widdowson's discourse analysis: a critical view’, Language and Literature, 5:1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500105
    Fairclough, N. (2000a) ‘Discourse, social theory and social research: the case of welfare reform’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00110
    Fairclough, N. (2000b) New Labour New Language? London: Routledge.
    Fairclough, N. (forthcoming) ‘Representations of change in neo-liberal discourse’, to appear in Relaciones Laborales, 2000.
    Fairclough, N. and Kress, G. (1993) ‘Critical discourse analysis’. Unpublished manuscript.
    Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. London: Sage, pp. 258-84.
    Fassmann, H. and Münz, R. (1992) Einwanderungsland Österreich? Gastarbeiter – Flüchtlinge – Immigranten. Vienna: Dachs-Verlag.
    Fassmann, H. and Münz, R. (eds) (1996) Migration in Europa. Historische Entwicklung, aktuelle Trends, politische Reaktionen. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
    Fassmann, H., Münz, R. and Seifert, W. (1997) ‘Die Arbeitsmarktposition ausländischer Arbeitskräfte in Deutschland (West) und Österreich’, in K.M. Bolte et al. (eds), Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt – und Berufsforschung, 30. Jg/ 1997. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, pp. 732-45.
    Fay, B. (1987) Critical Social Science. London: Polity Press.
    Firestone, W.A. (1993) ‘Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research’, Educational Researcher, 22: 16-23.
    Forgacs, D. (1988) Gramsci Reader. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    Foucault, M. (1978) ‘“Wahrheit und Macht”, Interview mit Michel Foucault von Alessandro Fontana und Pasquale Pasquino’, in M. Foucault (ed.), Dispositive der Macht. Über Sexualität, Wissen und Wahrheit. Berlin: Merve, pp. 21-54.
    Foucault, M. (1983) Der Wille zum Wissen. Sexualität und Wahrheit Bd. 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Foucault, M. (1988) Archäologie des Wissens,
    third edn.
    Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Foucault, M. (1989) Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses,
    eighth edn.
    Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Foucault, M. (1992) Was ist Kritik? Berlin: Merve (frz. 1990, lecture and discussion 1978).
    Foucault, M. (1996) Diskurs und Wahrheit. Berkeley Lectures 1983. Berlin: Merve.
    Fowler, R. (1991) ‘Critical linguists’, in K. Halmkjaer (ed.), The Linguistic Encyclopedia. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 89-93.
    Fowler, R. (1996) Linguistic Criticism,
    second edn.
    Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Fowler, R., Hodge, G., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (eds) (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Gee, J.P. (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
    Gee, J.P., Hull, G. and Colin L. (1996) The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.
    Girnth, H. (1996) ‘Texte im politischen Diskurs. Ein Vorschlag zur diskursorientierten Beschreibung von Textsorten’, Muttersprache, 106 (1): 66-80.
    Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
    Goffman, E. (1963) Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
    Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public. New York: Harper and Row.
    Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
    Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Graefen, G. (1997) Der wissenschaftliche Artikel – Textart und Textorganisation. Frankfurt: Lang.
    Gruber, H. (1991) Antisemitismus im Mediendiskurs. Die Affäre ‘Waldheim’ in der Tagespresse. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag (WDV).
    Grünalternative Jugend (ed.) (1998) Der Schoss ist fruchtbar noch … NSDAP (1920-1933) – FPÖ (1986-1998) Kontinuitäten, Parallelen, Ähnlichkeiten. Vienna: Grünalternative Jugend.
    Habermas, J. (1969) Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Habermas, J. (1971) Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Habermas, J. (1977) Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Habermas, J. (1996) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Habermas, J. (1998) Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Hall, S. (1996) ‘Introduction: who needs identity?’, in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds), Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage, pp. 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221907
    Halliday, M.A.K. (1970) The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman.
    Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.
    Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) (1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar,
    first and second edns
    . London: Arnold.
    Harré, R. (1998) The Singular Self: An Introduction to the Psychology of Personhood. London: Sage.
    Harré, R. and Gillett, G. (1994) The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243788
    Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1991) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press and Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Honneth, A. (1989) Kritik der Macht. Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Honneth, A. (1990) Die zerrissene Welt des Sozialen. Sozialphilosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Honneth, A. (1994) Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Horkheimer, M. (1992) Traditionelle und Kritische Theorie. Fünf Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, Theodor W. (1991 [1944]) Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt: Fischer.
    Hymes, D. (1972) ‘Models of interaction of language and social life’, in J.J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics – The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 35-71.
    Iedema, R. (1997) ‘Interactional dynamics and social change; planning as morphogenesis’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
    Iedema, R. (1999) ‘Formalizing organizational meaning’, Discourse and Society, 10 (1): 49-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010001003
    Jäger, M. (1996) ‘Fatale Effekte. Die Kritik am Patriarchat im Einwanderungsdiskurs’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Duisburg.
    Jäger, M., Cleve, G., Ruth, I. and Jäger, S. (1998) Von deutschen Einzeltätern und ausländischen Banden. Duisburg: DISS.
    Jäger, M., Jäger, S., Ruth, I., Schulte-Holtey, E. and Wichert, F. (eds) (1997) Biomacht und Medien. Wege in die Biogesellschaft. Duisburg: DISS.
    Jäger, S. (1993) Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. Duisberg: DISS.
    Jäger, S. (1996a) Brandsätze. Rassismus im Alltag,
    fourth edn.
    Duisburg: DISS.
    Jäger, S. (1996b) ‘Diskurstheorien’, in Helmwart Hierdeis and Theo Hug (eds), Taschenbuch der Pädagogik,
    revised and enlarged edn.
    Hohengehren: Schneider, pp. 238-49.
    Jäger, S. (1999) Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung,
    second revised and enlarged edn.
    Duisburg: DISS.
    Jäger, S., Kretschmer, D., Cleve, G., Griese, B., Jäger, M., Kellershohn H., Krüger, C. and Wichert, F. (1998) Der Spuk ist nicht vorbei. Völkisch-nationalistische Ideologeme im öffentlichen Diskurs der Gegenwart. Duisburg: DISS.
    Jarren, O., Sarcinelli, U. and Saxer, U. (eds) (1998) Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft. Ein Handbuch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80348-1
    Jessop, B. (2000) ‘The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24 (2): 323-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00251
    Johnston, A.M. (2000) ‘Making history in real time: agents and cultural tools in interaction’. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol.
    Jones, R.H. (1999) ‘Mediated action and sexual risk: searching for “culture” in discourses of homosexuality and AIDS prevention in China’, Culture, Health and Sexuality, 1 (2): 161-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136910599301085
    Jones, R.H. (2000) ‘Mediated discourse in drug abuse education and counselling’. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable.
    Jones, R., Scollon, R., Yung, V., Li, D. and Tsang, W.K. (1997) ‘Tracing the voices of Hong Kong's transition with subject-run focus groups’. Paper presented at the Second Symposium on Intercultural Communication, Beijing.
    Jung, M., Wengeler, M. and Böke, K. (eds) (1997) Die Sprache des Migrationsdiskurses. Das Reden über ‘Ausländer’ in Medien, Politik und Alltag. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
    Jurt, J. (ed.) (1998) Zeitgenössische Französische Denker: Eine Bilanz. Freiburg: Rombach Litterae.
    Jurt, J. (1999) Von Michel Serres bis Julia Kristeva. Freiburg: Rombach Litterae.
    Kant, I. (1952 [1781]) Critique of Pure Reason. Great Books of the Western World, in M.J. Adler (ed.), Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
    Kant, I. (1952 [1788]) Critique of Practical Reason. Great Books of the Western World, in M.J. Adler (ed.), Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
    Kant, I. (1952 [1790]) Critique of Judgement. Great Books of the Western World, in M.J. Adler (ed.), Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
    Kargl, M., Wetschanow, K., Wodak, R. and Perle, N. (1997) Kreatives Formulieren. Anleitungen zu geschlechtergerechtem Sprachgebrauch. Vienna: Bundesministerium für Frauenangelegenheiten und Verbraucherschutz.
    Kienpointner, M. (1992) Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
    Kienpointner, M. (1996) Vernünftig argumentieren. Regeln und Techniken der Diskussion. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
    Kienpointner, M. and Kindt, W. (1997) ‘On the problem of bias in political argumentation: An investigation into discussions about political asylum in Germany and Austria’, Journal of Pragmatics, 27: 555-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166%2896%2900035-5
    Kindt, W. (1992) ‘Argumentation und Konfliktaustragung in Äusserungen über den Golfkrieg’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 11: 189-215.
    Klein, J. (1998) ‘Politische Kommunikation – Sprachwissenschaftliche Perspektiven’, in O. Jarren et al. (eds), Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft. Ein Handbuch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 186-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80348-1_10
    Klemperer, V. (1987 [1947]) LTI. Notizbuch eines Philologen,
    fourth edn.
    Cologne: Röderberg.
    Klemperer, V. (1995) ‘Ich will Zeugnis ablegen bis zum Letzten’, Diaries 1933-1945, Berlin: Aufbau.
    Kopperschmidt, J. (1980) Argumentation. Sprache und Vernunft 2. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
    Kopperschmidt, J. (1989) Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Stuttgart: From-mann-Holzboog.
    Kreft, U., Uske, H. and Jäger, S. (eds) (1999) Kassensturz. Politische Hypotheken der Berliner Republik. Duisburg: DISS.
    Kress, G. (ed.) (1976) Halliday: System and Function in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Kress, G. (1989) ‘History and language: towards a social account of linguistic change’, Journal of Pragmatics, 13 (3): 445-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166%2889%2990065-9
    Kress, G. (1990) ‘Critical discourse analysis’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11: 84-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001975
    Kress, G. (1993) ‘Against arbitrariness: the social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis’, Discourse and Society, 4 (2): 169-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002003
    Kress, G. and Hodge, B. (1979) Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
    Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    Krings, H. et al. (1973) Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe. Munich: Kösel.
    Kriz, J. and Lisch, R. (1988) Methodenlexikon. Munich: Psychologie-Verlags-Union.
    Labov, W. (1972) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Laclau, E. (1981) Politik und Ideologie im Marxismus. Kapitalismus-FaschismusPopulismus. Berlin: Argument.
    Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso.
    Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    Lemke, J.L. (1995) Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.
    Lemke, J.L. (1999) ‘Opening up closure: semiotics across scales’. Paper presented at Closure: emergent organizations and their dynamics, University of Ghent, Belgium, http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/papers/gent.htm.
    Leontjew, A.N. (1982) Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit. Cologne: Pahl-Rugenstein.
    Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Levinson, S.C. (1988) ‘Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation’, in P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Boston: Northeastern University Press, pp. 161-227.
    Link, J. (1982) ‘Kollektivsymbolik und Mediendiskurse’, kultuRRevolution, 1: 6-21.
    Link, J. (1983) ‘Was ist und was bringt Diskurstaktik’, kultuRRevolution, 2: 60-6.
    Link, J. (1986) ‘Kleines Begriffslexikon’, kultuRRevolution, 11: 71.
    Link, J. (1992) ‘Die Analyse der symbolischen Komponenten realer Ereignisse. Ein Beitrag der Diskurstheorie zur Analyse neorassistischer Äusserungen’, in S. Jäger and F. Januschek (eds), Der Diskurs des Rassismus. Oldenburg: Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 46, pp. 37-52.
    Link, J. (1995) ‘Diskurstheorie’, in von W.F. Haug (ed.), Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, vol. 2. Hamburg: Argument, pp. 744-48.
    Link, J. and Link-Heer, U. (1990) ‘Diskurs/Interdiskurs und Literaturanalyse’, Zeitschrift für Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft (LiLi), 77: 88-99.
    Marcuse, H. (1980) Ideen zu einer kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Martin, J. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Martin, J. and Hasan, R. (eds) (1989) Language Development: Learning Language, Learning Culture. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Martín Rojo, L. and van Dijk, T.A. (1997) ‘“There was a problem, and it was solved!” Legitimating the Expulsion of “Illegal” Immigrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse’, Discourse and Society, 8 (4), 523-67.
    Martín Rojo, L. and Whittaker, R. (eds) (1998) Poder-decir o el poder de los discursos. Madrid: Arrecife.
    Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1969) ‘Die deutsche Ideologie’, Marx Engels Werke (MEW) 3. Berlin: Dietz.
    Matouschek, B., Wodak, R. and Januschek, F. (1995) Notwendige Massnahmen gegen Fremde? Genese und Formen von rassistischen Diskursen der Differenz. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
    Menke, C. and Seel, M. (1993) Zur Verteidigung der Vernunft gegen ihre Liebhaber und Verächter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Merton, R.K. (1967) On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press.
    Mey, J. (1985) Whose Language? Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Miller, J. and Glassner, B. (1997) ‘The “inside” and the “outside”: finding realities in interviews’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 99-112.
    Mitten, R. (1992) The Politics of Antisemitic Prejudice. The Waldheim Phenomenon in Austria. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Mitten, R. (1994) ‘Jörg Haider, the anti-immigration petition and immigration policy in Austria’, Patterns of Prejudice, 28 (2): 24-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.1994.9970125
    Moscovici, S. (1981) ‘On social representations’, in J. Forgas (ed.), Social Cognition. Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. London: Academic Press, pp. 191-209.
    Mouzelis, N. (1995) Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnoses and Remedies. London: Routledge.
    Muntigl, P., Weiss, G. and Wodak, R. (eds) (2000) European Union Discourses on Un/employment. An interdisciplinary approach to employment policy-making and organizational change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Ng, S.H. and Bradac, J.J. (1993) Power in Language. Verbal Communication and Social Influence. Newbury Park: Sage.
    Nishida, K. (1958) Intelligibility and the Philosophy of Nothingness. Tokyo: Maruzen Co. Ltd.
    Norris, S. (2000) ‘Sites of engagement in children's discourse: watching a movie, playing on the computer, and eating hotdogs’. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol.
    Oevermann, U., Allert, T., Konau, E. and Krambeck, J. (1979) ‘Die Methodologie einer “objektiven Hermeneutik” und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften’, in H.-G. Soeffner (ed.), Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften. Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 352-434.
    O'Neill, J. (1979) Kritik und Erinnerung. Studien zur politischen und sinnlichen Emanzipation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Parsons, T. and Shils, E. (eds) (1951) Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Pêcheux, M. (1982) Language, Semantics and Ideology. London: Macmillan.
    Pedro, E.R. (ed.) (1997) Discourse Analysis. Lisbon: Colibri Editions.
    Peräkylä, A. (1997) ‘Reliability and validity in research based on transcripts’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 201-20.
    Perelman, C. (1976) Juristische Logik als Argumentationstheorie. Freiburg/Munich: Alber.
    Perelman, C. (1980) Das Reich der Rhetorik. Munich: Beck.
    Perelman, C. (1994) Logik und Argumentation. Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum.
    Potter, J. (1997) ‘Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occuring data’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 144-60.
    Ragin, C.S. and Becker, H.S. (eds) (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Randolph, T. (2000) ‘Mediated discourse analysis: the social actor as mediational means in agents’ habitus’. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol.
    Reeves, F. (1989) British Racial Discourse: A Study of British Political Discourse about Race and Related Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Reisigl, M. (2000) ‘Literarische Texte als heuristische Quellen und kunstfertige Herausforderung für die sprachwissenschaftliche Analyse gesprochener Sprache – Eine Fallstudie am Beispiel von Friedrich Glauser’, in O. Panagl and W. Weiss (eds), Noch einmal: Dichtung und Politik Vom Text zum politisch sozialen Kontext, und zurück. Vienna: Bohlau, pp. 237-319.
    Reisigl, M. (2001) ‘Wie man eine Nation herbeiredet. Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung zur sprachlichen Konstruktion der österreichischen Identitätin politischen Gedenkreden’. Unpublished thesis, University of Vienna.
    Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2000) ‘“Austria First”. A discourse historical analysis of the Austrian Anti-foreigner petition in 1992 and 1993’. In M. Reisigl and R. Wodak (eds), The Semiotics of Racism. Vienna: Passogen Verlag, pp. 269-304.
    Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (eds) (2000) The Semiotics of Racism. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
    Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London, New York: Routledge.
    Ruesch, J. and Bateson, G. (1968 [1951]) Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
    Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Vols I and II, edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Sarcinelli, U. (1998) ‘Legitimität’, in O. Jarren et al. (eds), Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft. Ein Handbuch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 253-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80348-1_13
    Saville-Troike, M. (1989) The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Scharsach, H. (1992) Haiders Kampf. Vienna: Kremayr and Scheriau.
    Scharsach, H. and Knuch, K. (2000) Haider. Schatten über Europa. Cologne: Kiepenheuer and Witsch.
    Schegloff, E.A. (1998) ‘Text and context paper’, Discourse and Society, 3: 4-37.
    Scollon, R. (1997) ‘Handbills, tissues, and condoms: a site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1 (1): 39-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00003
    Scollon, R. (1998a) ‘A second sphere: media, English and the modernizing consciousness in contemporary Chinese secondary school children’. Paper presented at the conference ‘Images and issues: new communication research in Asia’, City University of Hong Kong.
    Scollon, R. (1998b) Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. New York: Longman.
    Scollon, R. (1999a) ‘Official and unofficial discourses of national identity: questions raised by the case of contemporary Hong Kong’, in R. Wodak and C. Ludwig (eds), Challenges in a Changing World: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, pp. 21-35.
    Scollon, R. (1999b) ‘Mediated discourse and social interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (1,2): 149-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI321&2_18
    Scollon, R. (2000a) ‘Mediated discourse: an integrated theory of sociolinguistic action’. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol.
    Scollon, R. (2000b) ‘Methodological interdiscursivity: an ethnographic understanding of uninalizability’, in S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard (eds), Discourse and Social Life. London: Longman, pp. 138-54.
    Scollon, R. (2000c) ‘On the ontogenesis of a social practice’. Paper given at Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis, Institute on Discourse, Identity and Politics, University of Vienna.
    Scollon, R. (2001) Mediated Discourse. The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.
    Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.B.K. (1979) Linguistic Convergence: An Ethnography of Speaking at Fort Chipewyan, Alberta. New York: Academic Press.
    Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (1997) ‘Political, personal, and commercial discourses of national sovereignty: Hong Kong becomes China’, in M. Lauristin (ed.), Intercultural Communication and Changing National Identities. Tartu: Tartu University Press, pp. 49-71.
    Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (forthcoming) Intercultural Communication,
    revised edition
    . Oxford: Blackwell.
    Scollon, R. and Yung, V. (1996) ‘The social location of reading: methodological issues in the study of reading as social practice’. Paper presented to the Centre for Language in Social Life, Macquarrie University, Sydney, Australia.
    Scollon, R., Bhatia, V., Li, D. and Yung, V. (1999a) ‘Blurred genres and fuzzy identities in Hong Kong public discourse: foundational ethnographic issues’, Applied Linguistics, 20 (1): 22-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.22
    Scollon, R., Tsang, W.K., Li, D., Yung, V. and Jones, R. (1999b) ‘Voice, appropriation, and discourse representation in a student writing task’, Linguistics and Education, 9 (3): 227-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898%2897%2990001-2
    Scollon, R., Scollon, S. and Kirkpatrick, A. (2000) Contrastive Discourse in Chinese and English: A Critical Appraisal. Beijing: Foreign Languages Teaching and Research Press.
    Scollon, S. (1995) ‘Methodological assumptions in intercultural communication’. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Cross-Cultural Communication: East and West, 15-19 August 1995, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, China.
    Scollon, S. (1996) ‘The commodification of the art of Taaigik Kyuhn (Taijiquan) in Hong Kong: a comparison of sahn wahn pang yau and organized classes’. Paper presented at the Conference on Consumer Culture in Hong Kong, Hong Kong University.
    Scollon, S. (1998) ‘Identity through the embodiment of authoritative gesture: the practice of taijiquan in Hong Kong’, in D.R. Heisey and W. Gong (eds), Communication and Culture: China and the World Entering the 21st Century. Amsterdam: Rodopi Editions, pp. 181-204.
    Scollon, S. (1999) ‘Voice and authority: positioning in taijiquan by interviewers/editors in contemporary China’. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the National Oral History Association, Anchorage.
    Scollon, S. (2000a) ‘Whose side are you on? Mediation of national identity through positioning in public space in real time during the Taiwan Missile Crisis’. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol.
    Scollon, S. (2000b) ‘Pruning and grafting: The cultivation of identity through imagined genealogies’. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, Chicago.
    Scollon, S. (2000c) ‘Political and somatic alignment: habitus, ideology and social practice’. Paper given at the workshop on Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis, Institute on Discourse, Identity and Politics, University of Vienna.
    Scollon, S. (2000d) ‘Who do you think you are? Identity, cognition and pragmatics in a taijiquan group’. Paper presented at the seventh International Pragmatics Association Conference, Budapest.
    Scollon, S.W. and Scollon, R. (2000) ‘The recursive discursive construction of agency and action: positioning ourselves against neo-liberalism’. Paper presented at the third Conference for Sociocultural Research, Campinas, Brazil.
    Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
    Silverman, D. (ed.) (1997) Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.
    Strauss, A.L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
    Tannen, D. (1994) Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Tannen, D., Schiffrin, D. and Hamilton, H. (eds) (2001) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Teubert, W. (1997) ‘Zum politisch-gesellschaftlichen Diskurs im Postsozialismus’. Unpublished manuscript, Mannheim.
    Teubert, W. (1999) ‘Zum Verlust von Pluralität im politisch-gesellschaftlichen Diskurs: Das Beispiel Besitzstände’, in U. Kreft, H. Uske and S. Jäger (eds), Kassensturz. Politische Hypotheken der Berliner Republik. Duisburg: DISS, pp. 29-48.
    Thompson, J.B. (1988) Critical Hermeneutics,
    fourth edn.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Thompson, J.B. (1990) Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857024480
    Toulmin, S. (1969) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1977) Text and Context: Exploration in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1980) Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1981) Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague/Berlin: Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110826142
    van Dijk, T.A. (1984) Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    van Dijk, T.A. (ed.) (1985) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (4 vols). New York: Academic Press.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1986) Racism in the Press. London: Arnold.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1990) ‘Social cognition and discourse’, in H. Giles and W.P. Robinson (eds), Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 163-86.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1991) Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. Newbury Park: Sage.
    van Dijk, T.A. (ed.) (1997) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
    van Dijk, T.A. (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217856
    van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
    van Leeuwen, T. (1993a) ‘Genre and field in critical discourse analysis’, Discourse and Society, 4 (2): 193-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002004
    van Leeuwen, T. (1993b) ‘Language and representation – the recontextualisation of participants, activities and reactions’. Unpublished thesis, University of Sydney.
    van Leeuwen, T. (1995) ‘Representing social action’, Discourse and Society, 6 (1): 81-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005
    van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors’, in C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32-70.
    van Leeuwen, T. (1999) Speech, Music, Sound. London: Macmillan.
    van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999) ‘Legitimizing immigration control. A discourse-historical analysis’, Discourse Studies, 1 (1): 83-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005
    Volosinov, V.I. (1973 [1928]) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
    Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wagner, W. (1994) Alltagsdiskurs. Die Theorie sozialer Repräsentationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
    Waldenfels, B. (1991) ‘Michel Foucault: Ordnung in Diskursen’, in F. Ewald and B. Waldenfels (eds), Spiele der Wahrheit. Michel Foucaults Denken. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 277-97.
    Webb, E.J. (1966) Unobtrusive Measures. Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: McNall.
    Wengeler, M. (1997) ‘Argumentation im Einwanderungsdiskurs. Ein Vergleich der Zeiträume 1970-1973 und 1980-1993’, in M. Jung, M. Wengeler and K. Böke (eds), Die Sprache des Migrationsdiskurses. Das Reden über ‘Ausländer’ in Medien, Politik und Alltag. Opladen: WDV.
    Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wertsch, J.V. (1991) Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wertsch, J.V. (1998) Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Wertsch, J.V. (forthcoming) ‘Vygotsky and Bakhtin on community’, in U. Sätterlund-Larsson (ed.), Socio-Cultural Theory and Methods: An Anthology.
    Widdowson, H.G. (1995) ‘Discourse analysis: a critical view’, Language and Literature, 4 (3): 157-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400301
    Williams, R. (1977) Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Wodak, R. (1989) ‘Introduction’, in R. Wodak (ed.), Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. i-ix.
    Wodak, R. (1996a) Disorders of Discourse. London and New York: Longman.
    Wodak, R. (1996b) ‘Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis’, in J. Verschueren (ed.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 207-210.
    Wodak, R. (2000a) ‘The rise of racism – an Austrian or a European phenomenon?’, Discourse and Society, 11 (1): 5-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001001
    Wodak, R. (2000b) ‘“Wer echt, anständig und ordentlich ist bestimme ich!” – Wie Jörg Haider und die FPÖ die österreichische Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft beurteilen’, Multimedia, 20 (2): 10-11.
    Wodak, R. (2000c) ‘Does sociolinguistics need social theory? New perspectives on critical discourse analysis’. Keynote speech at SS 2000, Bristol, April 2000 (shortened and published in Discourse & Society, 2 (3): 123-147).
    Wodak, R. (2001) ‘Diskurs, Politik, Identität’. In F. Brix, H. Goebl and O. Panagl (eds), Der Mensch und Seine Sprache(n). Vienna: Böhlau, pp. 80-102.
    Wodak, R. and de Cillia, R. (1988) ‘Sprache und Antisemitismus. Ausstellungskatalog’, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Wissenschaft und Kunst, 3.
    Wodak, R. and van Dijk, T.A. (eds) (2000) Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.
    Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., Liebhart, K., Hofstätter, K. and Kargl, M. (1998) Zur diskursiven Konstruktion nationaler Identität. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K. (1999) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Wodak, R., Menz, F., Mitten, R. and Stern, F. (1994) Sprachen der Vergangenheiten. Öffentliches Gedenken in österreichischen und deutschen Medien. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Wodak, R., Nowak, P., Pelikan, J., Gruber, H., de Cillia, R. and Mitten, R. (1990) ‘Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter’. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    Yung, V.K.Y. (1996) ‘A readership study of tertiary students in Hong Kong’. Paper presented at the International Conference on Communication and Culture: China and the world entering the 21st century, Peking University.
    Yung, V.K.Y. (1997) ‘The discourse of popular culture among tertiary students in Hong Kong’. Paper presented at the LACUS Forum, York University, Toronto.
    Yung, V.K.Y. (2000) ‘Focus groups as sites of engagement: a study of comparative conversational practices’. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol.

    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website