Media Regulation: Governance and the Interests of Citizens and Consumers
Publication Year: 2012
In Media Regulation, two leading scholars of the media examine the challenges of regulation in the global mediated sphere. Peter Lunt and Sonia Livingstone explore the way that regulation affects the relations between government, the media and communications market, civil society, citizens and consumers. Drawing on theories of governance and the public sphere, the book critically analyzes issues at the heart of today's media, from the future of public service broadcasting to burdens on individuals to develop their media literacy.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Media and Communications Regulation and the Public Interest
- Regulation and the Role of the State
- Regulation, Civil Society and the Public Sphere
- Market Innovation versus Social Democratic Values
- Introducing the Case Studies
- Chapter 2: Regulation and the Public Interest
- From Government to Governance
- The Theory of Regulation
- Strategies of Regulation
- New Labour, Social Democracy and Regulation
- The European Context
- The UK Context
- Regulation and the Public Interest
- Chapter 3: Ofcom's Core Purposes: A Discursive Struggle
- Media Regulation and the Implied Audience
- The Communications Act 2003 – In Whose Interest?
- Ofcom's Remit – Interpreting its Primary Duties
- Actions to Further Citizens’ and Consumers’ Interests
- Citizen Interests in a Wider Perspective
- Chapter 4: Ofcom as a Regulatory Agency
- Ofcom's Remit and Rationale
- From Guiding Principles to Working Practices
- Core Business: Telecommunications, Spectrum Management and Media Plurality
- Ofcom as an Institution in the Public Sphere
- The Content Board and (Communications) Consumer Panel
- Defining Citizen and Consumer Interests in Practice
- Public Views of Regulation
- Chapter 5: Ofcom's Review of Public Service Television
- Public Service Broadcasting in the 1980s and 1990s
- Ofcom's Remit in Reviewing Public Service Television
- Ofcom's First Review of Public Service Television
- A Public Service for All
- Ofcom's Second Public Service Television Review
- Ofcom's Consultation on the Second Review
- Chapter 6: Media Literacy
- A New Lease of Life for an Old Policy
- A Puzzling Task for the New Regulator
- Definitional Diversity in Europe
- Media Literacy as a Neoliberal Policy
- The Politics of Media Literacy
- From Media Literacy to Digital Participation
- From Principles to Practice
- From Individual Skills to Social Capabilities
- Chapter 7: Advertising Regulation and Childhood Obesity
- Regulating Advertising to Children
- The Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy
- Regulatory Action and Reaction
- Regulatory Effectiveness?
- Reflections on Evidence-Based Policy
- Chapter 8: Community Radio
- The Community Radio Order 2004
- Regulating Community Radio
- Evaluating Ofcom's Regulation of Community Radio
- Chapter 9: Conclusions
- A Change of Direction
- The Power to Make Policy
- On the Value of an Independent Regulator
© Peter Lunt and Sonia Livingstone 2012
First published 2012
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd
33 Pekin Street #02-01
Far East Square
Library of Congress Control Number: 2011929889
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-0-85702-570-8 (pbk)
Typeset by C&M Digitals (P) Ltd, Chennai, India
Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CRO 4YY
Printed on paper from sustainable resources
About the Authors[Page vi]
Peter Lunt is Professor of Media and Communication at the University of Leicester, UK. His research interests include audience research, popular television, the public understanding of media regulation and media and social theory and consumption research. He is the author of five books, including Talk on Television (with Sonia Livingstone, Routledge, 1994) and Stanley Milgram (Palgrave, 2010) and many academic papers. His research has received financial support from the Economic and Social Research Council UK, he has been a member of several European-funded networks and projects and has also conducted research for a number of public bodies including the Office of Fair Trading in the UK. He is currently working on a project on media, history and memory, focusing on the TV programme Who Do You Think You Are?, in collaboration with Claire Lynch at Brunei University. He is also writing about challenges to public service broadcasting and about the implications for media studies of the later works of Habermas. His future research plans include projects on the regulation of community radio and further work on the public understanding of media policy.
Sonia Livingstone is Professor of Social Psychology and Head of the Department of Media and Communications at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Her research examines children, families and the internet; media and digital literacies; the mediated public sphere; and audience reception for diverse television genres. She has been the author or editor of 14 books, including Audiences and Publics (edited, Intellect, 2005), The Handbook of New Media (edited, with Leah Lievrouw, Sage, 2006), Harm and Offence in Media Content (with Andrea Millwood Hargrave, Intellect, 2006), Media Consumption and Public Engagement (with Nick Couldry and Tim Markham, Palgrave, 2010), and Children and the Internet (2009, Polity Press). Sonia Livingstone serves at Evidence Champion for the UK's Council for Child Internet Safety, and has, at various times, also served on the Department of Education's Ministerial Taskforce for Home Access to Technology for Children, Ofcom's Media Literacy Research Forum, the Voice of the Listener and Viewer, and the Internet Watch Foundation. In addition she has been President of the International Communication Association (2007–8).
What do citizens need from the media and how can this be guaranteed? Who ensures that converging communications technologies serve the public interest? Do we even know what the public needs or wants? Can a single organisation balance industry and consumer demands in regulating media and communications? Can national governments still regulate in a global network society? Why does regulation increasingly rely on individuals acting responsibly? Who should participate in the process of regulation?
In response to globalisation, the increasing complexity of services and markets, and changes in welfare and governance, governments around the world are rethinking the nature, role and scope of regulation in a variety of markets. In this context, the UK's Communications Act 2003 established a new regulator for the media and communications sector, The Office of Communications (Ofcom), which, drawing on wider changes across Western democracies, also advanced New Labour's new regulatory regime. Ofcom took over the powers and responsibilities of regulators in the hitherto separate areas of telecommunications and broadcasting, and it has regulated the media and communications sector since 2003 through a mixture of measures to promote competition, plurality and diversity. Responsible for regulating television, radio, telecommunications and spectrum management (though not for all media, notably not music, film, the press or, curiously, that most convergent of all technologies, the internet), Ofcom has been closely observed by other countries also seeking a regulatory model to withstand the challenges of a globalising and converging media and communications landscape. Further, Ofcom exemplifies the regulatory innovations undertaken as part of the New Labour governments 1997–2010. For example, guided by principles of so-called ‘better regulation’, Ofcom has sought to reduce the regulatory burden on firms and to support self-regulation where possible. However, although Ofcom is a statutory agency with a wide range of legal duties, it has considerable discretion in how to meet those obligations, and its actions have resulted in public debate and occasional controversy.
Crucially, Ofcom is required to consult widely with its stakeholders, to conduct and publish market and consumer research and to measure the [Page viii]impact of regulation on markets and the plurality of both content and suppliers. Since many of these activities are conducted in and through public processes of deliberation, in this book we propose that Ofcom has acted, with greater or lesser success, as an institution in the public sphere. In today's complex societies, the potential of the public sphere – for impartial and inclusive processes of deliberation, the weighing of evidence and a recognition of diverse interests in debating policy and regulation -must increasingly be realised, if at all, through the institutional and civil society activities that bridge the oft-separated realms of policy making and the public. The ‘public’ of the public sphere should not, however, refer only to elites and experts speaking for people in their absence. We write as researchers of television audiences and mediated publics rather than as scholars steeped in the legacy of media policy research, and we have been struck by the relative absence of the voices and realities of audiences in policy analysis, including that conducted by the academy. Unsurprisingly, then, our main focus is on Ofcom's role in relation to the public interest -although of course we would acknowledge its significant activities in many other policy domains.
Intriguingly, Ofcom's primary duty was defined by the Act as the duty to further the interests of citizens and of consumers, a duty that has been regarded both optimistically and sceptically by observers of media regulation. Arguably, the public interest includes both the citizen and the consumer interest, although some would only align it with the former. Although Ofcom claims to represent the interests of citizens and consumers, to undertake consumer education and to engage with stakeholders (including audiences, through research and consultations with industry and the public), these regulatory roles require a difficult balance between economic regulation, consumer protection and furthering citizen interests. How, we asked, is this working, and with what consequences? In approaching these questions, our concern has been to explore how implicit and explicit conceptions of the audience shape policy developments in ways that may or may not serve the interests of citizens and consumers. Our interest in the lived realities of audiences has also attuned us to the discursive nature of policy making, leading us to look behind and beyond the actual decisions made so as to understand the processes through which decisions are reached, implemented (or not), and then re-made over time.
This book began life as an empirical project funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, which examined the design and activities of Ofcom and the Financial Services Authority, in particular the relations they established among regulators, firms, civil society, government and the public. In the project, entitled ‘Public Understanding of Regimes of Risk Regulation’, we asked, first, how the public is represented within the new culture of regulation and, second, how the public understands its changing [Page ix]role and responsibility within the communications and financial service sectors, with this potentially influencing individual and collective responses to risk. To some, this is a curious question – what does it matter how the public itself understands the regulatory institutions acting on its behalf? Is the public not simply uninterested in and ignorant of the activities of regulators? Does it not crossly endorse the tabloid view of regulation in terms of unwarranted interference and ‘red tape’ promulgated by the ‘nanny state’? Our focus group interviews with diverse members of the public did indeed open with such accounts but, they then went deeper, revealing some subtle and complex views and thereby justifying our determination to include their voices here.
In the project, as well as in this book, we did not set out to answer the simple question, is Ofcom a good thing? And has it made matters better or worse? Is the Coalition government of 2010 right to reduce its funding and limit its policy functions? No simple answers are forthcoming. Rather, in our analysis we appropriate the neutral observer role claimed by social sciences -we note, chart, explore and seek explanations. On the one hand, we note the positive marks accorded to Ofcom by many, recently including those who – as the present Coalition government puts forward in its new Communications Act – realise that much of value might be lost. Ofcom has operated during an eventful period in which telecommunications have been opened up as a market, commercial broadcasting has survived, if not perhaps thrived, in an increasingly competitive market, the digital switchover in broadcasting is progressing rather better than expected, media literacy has been widely promoted in new and creative ways, community radio has flourished, and even public service broadcasting, although constantly threatened, remains strong. On the other hand, Ofcom's critics have never been shy and there has grown up, in contrast with the above judgements, a well-articulated critique of the past decade of UK media regulation that should also be heard. This highlights the continued threats – political and economic – to the support for and independence of the BBC and other public service broadcasters, the relatively unchecked rise to power of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, the apparent sidelining of citizen interests compared with both consumer and, more significantly, industry interests, and the gradual shift in regulatory power from Whitehall to Brussels as European policy making grows in importance, increasingly setting the agenda for national policy.
In the context of these fascinating and important debates, we set out to answer a more complex question. Ofcom, as we will demonstrate, has done much to provide the opportunities and the evidence base to enhance diverse forms of participation in public debate over media policy. As a competition regulator, it has extended the protection of consumers and the advancement of their interests across the range of its activities, complementing its facilitation of market and industry interests. To achieve these aims, Ofcom has [Page x]operated as a publicly visible body liaising with civil society and the public as well as with government and industry. In so far as this advances the avowed values of the public sphere – argument, accountability, inclusiveness, transparency, evidence-based deliberation and decision making – our judgement of Ofcom is broadly positive. But in asking whether, by acting as an institution in the public sphere, it has improved outcomes in particular areas of media policy making, our answer is more equivocal. We remain convinced that acting as an institution in the public sphere must improve policy making in the public interest, certainly by comparison with closed, opaque and top-down approaches. But the messy realities, conflicting interests at stake and the very indeterminacies introduced by public-facing, participatory or evidence-based regulation can nonetheless undermine public interest outcomes. We explore a number of case studies of regulatory practice – public service broadcasting, the protection of children, media literacy and community radio – which illustrate the new regulatory challenges in several ways. Each is shaped by specific contingencies, from legacy traditions of policy and regulation to the immediate glare of political attention or media publicity, from the invisible hand of market or state influence to the unexpectedly persuasive appeal of new arguments or compelling evidence turning a debate.
Eschewing an explicitly political or normative stance, our overall aim, therefore, is to integrate an analysis of Ofcom's processes of working as an institution in the public sphere with the particular relation between process and outcomes revealed through our case studies. Possibly, other case studies would lead to different conclusions, and we would welcome a larger field of scholarship conducting exactly such analyses. But time is short in the sense that Ofcom is already changing as we write, and following the design and implementation of a new Communications Act, it will surely change further. For now, therefore, we draw out the processes that have characterised media and communications regulation as regards the interest of citizens and consumers from 2003 to now, this representing a key decade in the history of the digital age. In so doing, we articulate a critical repertoire by which Ofcom's role, and that of any alternative approach to regulation (as may emerge in the UK or elsewhere, now or subsequently), may be evaluated, depending on the standpoint of future critics. And we hope that, taken together, these insights may positively inform the debates to come.
How has, and how can, media and communications regulation further the interests of citizens and consumers? Chapter 1 reviews the changing context of governance and regulation, particularly in an age of globalisation and digitalisation, drawing out the challenges that this raises for culture and citizenship. Chapter 2 situates current theories of regulation, which examine the various forms that regulatory agencies take, and the range of strategies that they adopt, in order to focus on our specific context of media and [Page xi]communication regulation. Together, these chapters locate media regulation within a framework which is both wide-ranging and highly specific. As Black (2005) observes, regulatory innovation across sectors has gathered apace in recent years, partly in response to the European Commission policy to encourage national regulatory agencies, partly as a response to the perceived problems of traditional forms of legal and regulatory intervention given notable technical and market innovation and, most generally, in response to the growing dispersal of power away from the nation state in a time of globalisation.
Chapters 3 and 4 focus the lens first on the discursive debates surrounding the framing of Ofcom's key purposes, namely on furthering the interests of citizens and consumers and, second, on the shaping of Ofcom as an institution that operates substantially in the public sphere. Hence we elaborate the context of its establishment, its statutory duties, regulatory structures and operating principles. As already noted, this means we examine how Ofcom balances its joint responsibilities to further both citizen and consumer interests, how it implements its statutory obligation to consult widely with stakeholders and to conduct and publish research so as to engage a wide range of participants in regulation and to foster public debate. Since it is beyond the scope of this book to offer a comprehensive view of all of Ofcom's structures and activities, we here review key areas of its core business, such as spectrum management and media plurality.
Four case studies follow, selected in order to reveal the processes of regulatory innovation, research, consultation and engagement noted above. Again, these may not seem ‘typical’ of Ofcom's main work strands, but they do, we suggest, reveal its workings in areas of regulation that matter to citizens and consumers (or, audiences). They also demonstrate ways in which Ofcom has operated principally (though not entirely) within the realm of public deliberation and debate. The first case study is, perhaps, the most obvious, that of public service broadcasting. As discussed in Chapter 5, Ofcom was required by the Communications Act 2003 to review public service television although it had only limited regulatory powers over the BBC, the cornerstone of the UK public service system. Given that public service broadcasting represents a hotly contested area of media policy, this case study demonstrates how Ofcom engages public debate so as to draw on and advance beyond the considerable legacy of policy deliberation. This case study also demonstrates the limits of regulation in an area that is strongly contested by powerful stakeholders, including the government, the media industry, civil society bodies and the public.
By contrast with the challenges of addressing this substantial legacy of policy work, Chapter 6 examines how Ofcom defined and scoped a new area of media policy – new at least to media regulators (though not educators) -that of media literacy, this being an intriguing requirement placed on Ofcom [Page xii]by the Communications Act. In this largely uncharted territory, Ofcom sought to develop policy to address a growing problem – the realisation that cross-border and convergent media technologies mean that regulatory control over media content is increasingly ‘out of reach’ of national regulation. Can enhancing media literacy among audiences, enabling them to exercise choice and adopt a critical stance on media content, meet this challenge, and if so, can the regulator promote this through effective stakeholder partnerships (rather than through traditional, top-down methods of control over media content and services)? Or is the promotion of media literacy less a policy designed to further the public interest than one motivated by those interests that are anxious to deregulate converging media platforms?
The protection of children has long been a specific and widely accepted role for media regulation, though our third case study – that of the regulation of junk food advertising in a context of fast-rising childhood obesity -proved no less controversial than the other two (see Chapter 7). We use this case to focus especially on Ofcom's research activities, research providing a key means by which the audience's interests and needs, especially in the lay voices of children and parents, can be recognised within the process of expert deliberation. The limitations of evidence-based policy provide a point of critical reflection on Ofcom's activities and the ambitions of the regulatory regime it represents. The outcome of this particular case also points up the persistently less than transparent relation between the regulator and the state.
Finally, we consider Ofcom's ground-breaking work on community radio in Chapter 8. Building on the work of one of its legacy regulators, The Radio Authority, Ofcom has succeeded in establishing a proper licensing system for community radio for the first time in the UK from 2004. This case study identifies the impact of Ofcom's commitments to enhancing plurality and diversity while also regulating competition (in this case between the emerging community sector and local radio). This case study also shows how Ofcom works closely with civil society bodies and promotes innovation in the media system by enabling the development of a licensed community radio sector in the UK, which had not previously emerged from either the public service or the independent sector despite considerable enthusiasm for the third tier of media. However, as we will see, this case study also reveals concerns over the way that regulation introduces controls that shape this emerging sector.
These case studies, we believe, demonstrate the complexity of the background and legacy that Ofcom inherited, the difficulties inherent in adopting a variety of regulatory strategies and powers, and the importance of partnership and engagement between regulators and stakeholders from government, commerce, civil society and the public. As a statutory agency working within a strong legal framework and policy context established by [Page xiii]government, Ofcom has nonetheless had considerable discretion regarding how to meet its obligations from its inception in 2003 through to mid-2010. In the final chapter, we reflect on the changes brought in by the Conservative/Liberal Democrat Coalition government in May 2010, as part of a reformulation of the responsibility for public policy making, for the role of quasi-independent public bodies, and the broader relations between business, state and public, several areas of responsibility (including the review of public service broadcasting) and a considerable proportion of its staffing and budget were removed from Ofcom. At the time of writing, we can only begin to speculate here on how these changes may impact on the subtle and complex balance that Ofcom has sought to achieve when representing the interests of citizens and consumers.
This book draws on the research project directed by Peter Lunt and Sonia Livingstone, Public Understanding of Regimes of Risk Regulation, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) as part of the ‘Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Network’, directed by Peter Taylor-Gooby (RES-336-25-0001; see http://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/). For the project website and publications, see http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/PURRR/. We thank Peter Taylor-Gooby for his support throughout the project, Tanika Kelay Laura Miller and Sarita Malik for their work on the project, and all those who kindly gave up their time to be interviewed.
We thank all the interviewees for the ESRC project. Please note that, throughout this volume, they are referred to in terms of their role at the time (notwithstanding that several have moved role or organisation since then). Interviews included (with roles in 2005 in brackets): Colette Bowe (Chairman, Consumer Panel), Neil Buckley (Policy Director, Consumer, Competition and Markets, Ofcom), Robin Foster (Partner, Strategy and Market Developments, Ofcom), Richard Hooper (Chair of the Content Board, Ofcom), Graham Howell (Secretary to the Corporation, Ofcom), Kip Meek (Senior Partner, Competition and Content, Director of Competition Policy, Competition and Content, Ofcom), Julie Myers (Policy Manager Consumer Panel, Ofcom), Helen Normoyle (Policy Executive, Director of Market Research, Ofcom), Matt Peacock (Director of Communications, Ofcom), Tony Stoller (Executive Committee, and External Relations Director, Ofcom), Rhodri Williams (Director, Nations-Wales, Ofcom), Claire Milne (Freelance Consumer Spokesperson, Antelope Consulting), Pat Holland, Jonathan Hardy and Gary Herman (Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom), Jocelyn Hay (Chairman, Voice of the Listener and Viewer), Don Redding (Campaign Co-ordinator, Public Voice), Luke Gibbs and Russ Taylor (Founders, OfcomWatch blog), John Beyer (Director, MediaWatch-UK), Allan Williams, Senior Policy Advisor, Consumers’ Association – Which?), Paul Skidmore (Senior Researcher, DEMOS think tank), Richard Collins (academic, Ex-Oftel Advisor), Stephen Whittle (Controller, BBC Editorial Policy, BBC) and Simon Pitts (Controller Regulatory Policy, ITV). As part of [Page xv]that same project, the authors conducted 16 focus groups with a cross-section of the UK public, totalling 116 people in all. The discussions ranged across risk and regulation issues broadly, though two sectors – communications and financial services – were explored in detail. We thank all participants for their lively conversations with us.
We note, by way of declaration of interests, that in relation to Chapter 6 (’Media Literacy’), Sonia Livingstone acted as a consultant to Ofcom in 2005, being commissioned to review the academic literature on adult media literacy (Livingstone et al., 2005). She is also a member of Ofcom's Media Literacy Research Forum and she and Andrea Millwood Hargrave responded independently to Ofcom's first media literacy consultation in 2004, advising on the definition of media literacy and its implementation and evaluation; she has also emphasised the importance of media literacy in formal responses to Ofcom's annual plans in 2006, 2007 and 2008. In relation to Chapter 7 (Advertising Regulation and Childhood Obesity’), Sonia Livingstone acted as consultant to Ofcom in 2004 and 2005–06, having been commissioned by the Research Department to review the academic literature on the effects of food promotion (mainly advertising) on children's food choice and, ultimately, childhood obesity; this resulted in three reports, all publicly available (Livingstone, 2004, 2006; Livingstone and Helsper, 2004). From 2006–09, Sonia Livingstone served on the Board of Directors of the civil society group, Voice of the Listener and Viewer. Parts of Chapter 3 are developed from earlier texts published as Livingstone and Lunt (2007, 2011) and Livingstone, Lunt and Miller (2007a, 2007b). Earlier versions of parts of Chapter 4 were published in Lunt and Livingstone (2007). Earlier versions of parts of Chapter 6 have been published in Livingstone (2008a, 2009b, 2010). The focus group interviews are reported in detail in Lunt et al. (2008).
We warmly thank colleagues who have read earlier drafts of the chapters that follow: Robin Blake, Ian Blair, Bart Cammaerts, Nico Carpentier, Richard Collins, Divina Frau-Megs, Lawrie Hallett, Sylvia Harvey, Jeanette Hofmann, Dale Kunkel, Peter Lewis, Greg Lowe, Kathryn Montgomery, Jill Pitt, Nick Stevenson, Tony Stoller and two anonymous reviewers. We thank Ed Richards, Ofcom's CEO, and Colette Bowe, Ofcom's Chairman, for agreeing to be interviewed in February 2011 as we were writing the manuscript. We also thank Dawn Rushen and Yinhan Wang for tidying up our text. However, the opinions expressed in the book, and any mistakes, remain our own. Finally, we thank Mila Steele at Sage for believing in this project and for being, as always, a wonderful publisher to work with.and [Page xvi]
It has been a challenge to stop revising this manuscript in mid 2011, knowing that the situation is about to change. On 7 January, Ofcom published its Draft Annual Plan, announcing that following a major review of expenditure, it would cut spending by 28 per cent over four years, with most of the savings delivered during 2011/12. Then on 19 January, the Secretary of State Jeremy Hunt (2011a) announced ‘a radical rethink’, moving key responsibilities from the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) to his own ministry, the DCMS, and announcing a Green Paper for the end of 2011, leading to a Bill in 2012 and a new Communications Act by 2015:
It is now seven years since the last Act — a long time in today's fast-paced environment. Now is the moment to make sure we have the most modern, innovation- and investment-friendly legal structure in place … I am prepared to radically rethink the way we do things … This is not about tweaking the current system, but redesigning it — from scratch if necessary — to make it fit for purpose.
In May, he issued an ‘open letter’ inviting consultation responses on the requirements for communications regulation in the digital age, a letter almost entirely focused on a deregulatory approach designed to stimulate economic growth (Hunt, 201 lb).1 We could comment further, but we have decided to stop now, having charted the history of Ofcom under New Labour, from its prehistory before its establishment by the Communications Act 2003 through to the transition to a new government in 2010. We have documented how Ofcom has addressed its responsibilities during this period across a range of domains – the review of public service broadcasting, community radio, the promotion of media literacy, developing co-regulatory arrangements in advertising and, most generally, furthering the interests of citizens and consumers. The next decade – for Ofcom, for UK citizens, for the media and communications landscape – cannot yet be clearly discerned. But we hope that our analysis offers a context, a point of comparison, and [Page 195]some clear criteria against which further changes in the governance and regulation of media and communications in the UK and elsewhere may be judged.Notes
1 The three themes highlighted in the letter were ‘Growth, innovation and deregulation; A communications infrastructure that provides the foundations for growth; Creating the right environment for the content industry to thrive.’
References[Page 196]1998) Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.and (ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority) (2009) ‘What is digital media literacy and why is it important?’ (http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_311470).1998) ‘Mass communication, ritual and civil society’, in T.Liebes and J.Curran (eds), Media, Ritual and Identity. London: Routledge, pp. 3–22., and (America Online (AOL) (2002). Evidence to the Joint Select Committee, House of Commons Research Paper, 26 November, Westminster.2007) ‘Public service television for children’, Early Day Motion, 585 (http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=34730).(1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.(2003) ‘Curb on junk food adverts to combat obesity’, The Guardian, 1 December., and (2002) Alternative Media. London: Sage.(1993) Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute.(2007) ‘The European Charter for Media Literacy: meaning and potential’, Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1): 80–7.and (2007) Understanding Alternative Media. Buckingham: Open University Press., and (2011). Letting Children be Children: Report of an Independent Review of the Commercialisation and Sexualisation of Childhood. London: Department for Education.(1999) Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.and (Baldwin, R., Scott, C. and Hood, C. (eds) (1998) A Reader on Regulation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.2010) What's Wrong with Media Monopolies? A Lesson from History and a New Approach to Media Ownership Policy. Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper Series No. 18. London: LSE.(2010) ‘Why the BBC matters: memo to the New Parliament about a unique British institution’, The Political Quarterly, 81(3).and (Barry, A., Osbourne, T. and Rose, N. (eds) (1996) Foucault and Political Reason. London: UCL Press.[Page 197]2001) ‘An agenda for the second phase of media literacy development’, in R.Kubey (ed.), Media Literacy in the Information Age: Current Perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 69–78.(BBC (2004) Building Public Value: Renewing the BBC for a Digital World (http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/policies/pdf/bpv.pdf).BBC (2007) Memorandum of Understanding between the Office of Communications (Ofcom) and the BBC Trust (http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/ofcom_trust_mou.pdf).1986/2005) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.(1969) ‘Two concepts of liberty’, in Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press.(BIS (Business, Innovation and Skills) and DCMS (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) (2009) Digital Britain. London: BIS and DCMS (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100511084737/ and http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/digitalbritain-finalreport-jun09.pdf).BIS and DCMS (2010) National Plan for Digital Participation. London: BIS and DCMS (http://www.digitalparticipation.com/sites/default/files/national-plan/National-Plan-Digital-Participation-Final.pdf).2002) Critical Reflections on Regulation. Discussion Paper. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation.(Black, J., Lodge, L., and Thatcher, M. (2005) (eds.) Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Blumler, J. G. (ed.) (1992) Television and the Public Interest: Vulnerable Values in West European Broadcasting. London: Sage.2009) ‘Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review’, Science and Public Policy, 36(4): 255–70., and (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2004) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC. London: Seeker and Warburg.(Braman, S. (ed.) (2003) Communication Researchers and Policy-Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.1998) ‘Media education in the UK: moving beyond protectionism’, Journal of Communication, 48(1): 33–42.(2005) The Media Literacy of Children and Young People. London: Ofcom.(2007) ‘Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the internet’, Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1): 43–55.(2009a) The Impact of the Commercial World on Children's Wellbeing. Report of an Independent Assessment. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport [Includes a Technical Appendix: Children, Commerce, and Obesity: What Role Does Marketing Play?](2009b) ‘The appliance of science: the role of evidence in the making of regulatory policy on children and food advertising in the UK’, International journal of Cultural Policy, 15(2): 201–15.(2009c) ‘Beyond the competent consumer: the role of media literacy in the making of regulatory policy on children and food advertising in the UK’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(2): 217–30.(2008) ‘Public service in the digital age: opportunities and threats in a diverse Europe’, in I.Fernandez Alonso and M. D.Moragas iSpa (eds), Communication and Cultural Policies in Europe. Barcelona: Government of Catalonia, Department of the President([Page 198]Cabinet Office (2010) ‘Deputy Prime Minister highlights the government's commitment to children and families’ (http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/newsroom/news_releases/2010/100617-children.aspx).1993) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2009) Speech: People Power - Reforming Quangos, 6 July (http://www.con-servatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/07/David_Cameron_People_Power_-_Reforming_Quangos.aspx).(Carpentier, N (2011) Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol: Intellect.2001) Community Media – Muting the Democratic Media Discourse? Social Theory and Discourse. Brighton: Centre for Critical Studies in Communication and Culture: The International Social Theory Consortium, pp. 1–24., and (2003a) Speech: The Communications Act: Myths and Realities, 9 September (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2003/10/carter_20031009(2003b) Ofcom speech: Royal Television Society Cambridge Convention, 19 September (http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2003/09/19/royal-television-society-cambridge-convention-friday-19-september-2003/(2004) Speech to the Voice of the Listener and Viewer Spring Conference, 29 February (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2004/04/carter_voice_20040429.(1996) The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. I. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.(2003) ‘Global information capitalism’, in D.Held and A.McGrew (eds), The Global Transformations Reader ((2nd edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.2005) Independent Audit of Spectrum Holdings. London: HMSO (http://www.spectrumaudit.org.uk/pdf/caveaudit.pdf).(2009) Transnational Television in Europe: Reconfiguring Global Communications Networks. London: I.B. Tauris.(2010) UK Community Radio: Policy Frames and Outcomes. Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper Series. London: LSEhttp://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/mediaWorkingPapers/MEDIA@LSE Electronic MSc Dissertation Series).(2009) Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana, III: University of Illinois Press., , , and (2006) ‘The internet and public-private governance in the European Union’, Journal of Public Policy, 26(1): 43–61.and (2007) Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services. London: Sage., and (2010) Remarks of Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn ‘A national Digital Literacy Corps to meet the adoption challenge’. Speech delivered at the Digital Inclusion Summit, 9 March (http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/D0C-296738Al.pdf).(2009) The Internetand Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.and ([Page 199]1994) Broadcasting and Audio-Visual Policy in the European Single Market. London: John Libby.(2007) The BBC and public value’, Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(2): 164–84.(2009) ‘Paradigm found: the Peacock Report and the genesis of a new model UK broadcasting policy’, in T.O'Malley and J.Jones (eds), The Peacock Committee and UK Broadcasting Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 146–64.(1996) New Media, New Policies: Media and Communications Strategies for the Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.and (2007) ‘UK broadcasting policy: the “longwave” shift in conceptions of accountability’, in P.Baldi and U.Hasebrink (eds), Broadcasters and Citizens in Europe: Trends in Media Accountability and Viewer Participation. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 33–52.and (Commission of the European Communities (1984) Television without Frontiers: Green Paper on the Establishment of the Common Market for Broadcasting Especially by Satellite and Cable. COM 9840 300 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Commission of the European Communities (1999) Principles and Guidelines for the Community's Audiovisual Policy in the Digital Age. COM 657 final, Brussels.Commission of the European Communities (2009) Europe's Digital Competitiveness Report: Main Achievements of the i2010 Strategy 2005–2009. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Committee of Advertising Practice (n.d.) ‘The codes’ (http://www.cap.org.uk/The-Codes.aspx).Communications Consumer Panel (2010) Putting the Consumer First: The Work of the Communications Consumer Panel. London: Communications Consumer Panel.2004) ‘Freedom, rights and regulations’, Media, Culture & Society, 26(6): 893–9.(2010) Public Connection? Media Consumption and the Presumption of Attention. Houndmills: Palgrave., , and (Council of the European Communities (1989) Directive on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Governingthe Pursuit of Television Broadcasting Activities, (Television without Frontiers Directive) 89/552/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities, I: 298/23.1998) ‘Convergence, competition and regulation’, International Journal of Communications Law & Policy, Summer(1). Available online at: http://www.ijclp.net/ijclp_web-doc_6-l-1998.htmland (2002) An Introductory History of British Broadcasting ((2nd edition). London: Routledge.2002) ‘Policy’, in Cunningham, S. and Turner, G. (eds), The Media and Communications in Australiaand (3rd ed(St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 2002), pp. 48–61.2002) Media and Power. London: Routledge.(2010) Power without Responsibility: Press, Broadcasting and the Internet in Britain (and (7th edition). London: Routledge.2003) Speech to the English National Forum Seminar, 7 July (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2003/07/currie_20030707).(2005) Speech to the ISPA Parliamentary Advisory Forum, 26 January (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2005/01/ispa).(2007) ‘Media governance: new ways to regulate the media’, Communications, 32: 323–5.(2009) Media and Political Engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.([Page 200]2010) BBC Governance and Financial Accountability. London® House of Commons Library (http://www.parliament.uk/briefingpapers/commons/lib/research/briefings/snha-05332.pdf).and (2008) An Introduction to the Communications Consumer Panel (http://www.rogerdarlington.co.uk/OCP.html).(DCMS (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) (n.d.) ‘Media literacy’ (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/broadcasting/3179.aspx).DCMS (2004) The Community Radio Order (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1944/contents/made).DCMS (2006) A Public Service for All: The BBC in the Digital Age. White Paper. London: The Stationery Office.DCMS and BERR (Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) (2009) Digital Britain: The Interim Report. London: DCMS and BERR (http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/digital_britain_interimreportjan09.pdf).de Bens, E. (ed.) (2007) Media Between Culture and Commerce. Bristol: Intellect.Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.DH (Department of Health) (2004) Choosing Health: Making Healthy Choices Easier. White Paper. London: The Stationery Office.DH (2008) Changes in Food and Drink Advertising and Promotion to Children. London: Department of Health.2007) ‘The new institutionalism as a theoretical foundation of media governance’, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 32(3): 325–9.(1986) Television and Children: A Special Medium for a Special Audience. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.(2005) ‘The Communications Act 2003: A new regulatory framework in the UK’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 11(3): 75–94.and (1998) New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism. Cambridge: Polity Press.and (2002) Blair's Britain. Cambridge: Polity Press.and (DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)/DCMS (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) (1998) Regulating Communications: Approaching Convergence in the Information Age. London: DTI (http://www.dti.gov.uk/converg/).DTI/DCMS (2000) A New Future for Communications. The Communications White Paper. London: DTI (http://www.communicationswhitepaper.gov.uk/).DTI/DCMS (2002, June) ‘Note on the meaning of “customer”, “consumer” and “citizen”’, to the Joint Select Committee, Department of Trade and Industry and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/jt200102/jtselect/jtcom/169/2070808.htm).2000) In Praise of Bureaucracy. London: Sage.(2002) ‘The influence of advertising on the demand for chocolate confectionery’, International Journal of Advertising, 21: 437–54.and (1993) The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.(Europa (2009a) ‘Media literacy in the digital environment’ (http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/audiovisual_and_media/am0004_en.htm).Europa (2009b) ‘Commission sets new information society challenge: Becoming literate in new media’ (http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/O9/1244&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en).[Page 201]European Association for Viewers’ Interests (2009) Study on Assessment Criteria for Media Literacy Levels. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General, Information Society and Media, Media Literacy Unit.European Commission (n.d.) ‘High level expert group (HLEG) 2006–2009’ (http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/other_expert_groups/hleg/index_en.htm).European Commission (1989) Council Directive of 3 October 1989. Brussels: European Commission.European Commission (2007) Report on the Results of the Public Consultation on Media Literacy. Brussels: European Commission.European Commission (2009) ‘Commission sets new information society challenge: becoming literate in new media’ (http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/1244&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en).European Commission (2010)/A Digital Agenda for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.European Parliament (2008) Report on Community Media in Europe. A6-0263/2008, 24/06, Brussels: European Parliament.European Parliament (2010) Opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (25.3.2010). Brussels: European Parliament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2010-0066+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN).European Parliament and the Council (2007) ‘Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council’, Official Journal of the European Union (332): 27–45 (http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:332:0027:0045:EN:PDF).European Parliament and the Council (2010) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). Brussels: European Parliament and the Council (http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st03/st03683.en09.pdf).Everett (2003) New Voices - An Evaluation of 15 Access Radio Projects (http://stake-holders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/broadcast/radio-ops/new_voices.pdf).2002) ‘Language in new capitalism’, Discourse & Society, 13(2): 163–6.(2006) Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.and (2007) Fair Game? Assessing Commercial Activity on Children's Favourite Websites and Online Environments. London: National Consumer Council and Childnet International., , and (2008) ‘Swiss telecommunications policy: from state monopoly to intense regulation’, Flux, 11(4): 78–91.(1991) Democracy and Deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. London: Yale University Press.(2005) Competition and the Public Interest: A More Transparent Approach. A Paper for the OECD/Ofcom Roundtable on Communications Convergence (http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2005/06/07/competition-and-the-public-interest-a-more-transparent-approach-a-paper-for-the-oecdofcom-roundtable-on-communications-convergence-2-june-2005/).(1991) ‘Governmentality’, in G.Burchell, C.Gordon and P.Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.([Page 202]1990) Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.(Frau-Meigs, D. (ed.) (2007) Media Education: A Kit for Teachers, Students, Parents and Professionals. Paris: UNESCO Communication and Information Sector.Frau-Meigs, D. and Torrent, J. (eds) (2009) Mapping Media Education Policies in the World: Visions, Programmes and Challenges. New York: United Nations Alliance of Civilizations and Grupo Comunicar.2008) The Politics of Media Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.(Freepress (2009) 2009 Media and Tech Priorities: A Public Interest Agenda. Washington, DC: Freepress (http://www.freepress.net/files/2009techpolicy.pdf).2009) ‘Public participation and agency discretion in rulemaking at the Federal Communications Commission’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 35 (4): 337–53.(1999) ‘Amartya Sen's “capabilities” approach to the evaluation of welfare: its application to communications’, in A.Calabrase and J.-C.Burgelman (eds), Communication, Citizenship and Social Policy. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 113–24.(2003) What Video Games Have To Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.(2005) ‘Competition policy and regulatory style - issues for OFCOM’, Info, 7 (5): 42–51.(2009) ‘The future of public service content in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Media Law, 1: 1–13.(1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2005) ‘A comparison of new British community radio stations with established Australian community radio stations’, 3CMedia Journal of Community, Citizen's and Third Sector Media and Communication, 2: 15–29.(Government Office for Science (2007) ‘Tackling obesities: future choices’, Foresight Report, October.2008) Speech to the Voice of the Listener and Viewer, 2/10/08 ‘Public Service Broadcasting - Putting the People First’, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2008/09/vlv_psb(1997) Broadcasting, Society and Policy in the Multimedia Age. Luton: University of Luton Press.and (Gripsrud, J. and Weibull, L. (eds) (2010) Media, Markets & Public Spheres. Bristol: Intellect.1962, trans 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1976) Legitimation Crisis. Translation and introduction by ThomasMcCarthy. London: Heinemann Educational Books.(1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2006) ‘Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research’, Communication Theory, 16: 411–26.(2009) Community Radio: Collaboration and Regulation, (http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/events/MeCCSA/MeCCSA_Conference_Papers.aspx).and (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and ([Page 203]2002) The civil society challenge to global media policy’, in M.Raboy (ed.), Global Media Policy in the New Millennium. Luton: Luton University Press, pp. 251–60.(2003) ‘Statement on communication rights’, Paper presented at the World Forum on Communication Rights, Geneva, Switzerland (http://www.globalizacija.com/doc_en/e0030ict.htm).(Hansard (2002) Written answer from the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 16 December (http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/2002/dec/16/television-services#S6CV0396PO_20021216_CWA_156)Hansard (2003) Report stage of the passage of the Bill, House of Lords, 23 June 2003, (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldhansrd/vo030623/text/3062304.htm)Hansard (2007) Parliamentary business, 2 May. (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070502/text/70502w0011.htm)2008) ‘Ofcom, regulation and reform’, Soundings, 39 (1): 87–97.(2010) ‘Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation’”, Sociological Inquiry, 80 (1): 92–113.(2011) ‘Towards a developmental conceptualisation of contributors to overweight and obesity in childhood: the six-C's model’, Child Development Perspectives, 5 (1): 50–58., , , , , , , , and (2006) ‘Ofcom's first year and neo-liberalism's blind spot: attacking the culture of production’, Screen, 47 (1): 91–105.(‘Ofcom: the reluctant regulator’, in J.Petley and G.Williams (eds), The Media in Contemporary Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.(forthcoming)2009) ‘Quality assessments and patterns of use. Conceptual and empirical approaches to the audiences of public service media’, in G. F.Lowe (ed.), The Public in Public Service Media. Goteborg: Nordicom, pp. 135–49.(2003) Review of the Research on the Effects of Food Promotion to Children (Final report). London: Food Standards Agency., , , , , et al. (2005) Self-regulation of food advertising: what it can, could and cannot do to discourage unhealthy eating habits among children. Nutrition Bulletin, 30 (4): 374–382.(2007) Marketing Food to Children: Changes in the Global Regulatory Environment 2004–2006. Geneva: World Health Organization.(2002) Speech, Westminster Media Forum, 5 December, The Communications Bill and the Citizen. (http://www.vlv.org.uk/combill291202issues.html).(1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2006) Models of Democracy ((3rd edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.2007) ‘Co-regulation in European Union member states’, Communications, 32: 415–22.(Held, D. and McGrew, A. (eds) (2003) The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (2nd edition). Oxford: Polity Press.2005) R18 Material: Its Potential Impact on People Under 18: An Overview of the Available Literature. London: Office of Communications.(2010) ‘Digital natives: where is the evidence?’, British Educational Research Journal, 36 (3): 503–20.and (2005) ‘Media and cultural policy as public policy: the case of the British Labour Party’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11 (1): 1–13.([Page 204]High Level Expert Group (2008) Digital Literacy: High Level Expert Group Recommendations. Brussels: European Commission High Level Expert Group.1998) The seven great debates in the media literacy movement’, Journal of Communication, 48 (1): 6–32.(2008) ‘Debates and challenges facing new literacies in the 21st century’, in K.Drotner and S.Livingstone (eds), International Handbook of Children, Media and Culture. London: Sage, pp. 431–47.(2002) The Making of New Labour's European Policy. London: Palgrave.(2010) Broadband Adoption and Use in America. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.(1994) Explaining Economic Policy Reversals. Buckingham: Open University Press. House of Commons (2002) Research Paper 02/6, 26 November (http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2002/rp02-067.pdf).(2010) Public Bodies Bill. London: The Stationery Office.(2008) ‘The principal axes of the European Union's audiovisual policy’, in I.Fernandez Alonso and M. D.MoragasI.Spa (eds), Communication and Cultural Policies in Europe. Barcelona: Government of Catalonia, Department of the President, pp. 151–82.(2010) ‘Letter to Sir Michael Lyons’. London: DCMS (http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/Lyons_BBC.pdf).(2011a) ‘Speech to the Oxford Media Convention.’ 19 January 2011. (http://www.culture.gov.uk/news/ministers_speeches/7726.aspx)(2011b) ‘A Communications Review for the Digital Age. An open letter, 16 May 2011.’ London: DCMS. Available at: http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/commsreview-open-letter_160511.pdf(Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2005) Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press,Iosifidis, P. (ed.) (2010) Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.2007) Rude Awakening: Social and Media Change in Central and Eastern Europe. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.(2010) ‘PSB 3.0: reinventing European PSB’, in P.Iosifidis (ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.(2005) ‘Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns’, Obesity Reviews, 6 (2): 123–32., , , , , et al. (2006) An Occasional Paperon Digital Media and Learning. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: The John D and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation.(2000) ‘The state and the contradictions of the knowledge-driven economy’, in J. R.Bryson, P. W.Daniels, N. D.Henry and J.Pollard (eds), Knowledge, Space, Economy. London: Routledge.(2009) ‘Measuring media concentration and diversity: new approaches and instruments in Europe and the US’, Media, Culture & Society, 31 (1): 97–117.(1991) The Media and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2002) Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. London: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office (http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/downloads/files/public_value2.pdf)., and ([Page 205]2001) ‘Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: classifying and managing risks’, Journal of Risk Research, 4 (2): 159–74.and (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.(2010) Speech: ‘The digital agenda: challenges for Europe and the mobile industry’, the Mobile World Congress 2010, Barcelona, 15 February.(1990) ‘The role of research in the regulation of US children's television advertising’, Science Communication, 12 (1): 101–19.(2001) ‘Children and television advertising’, in D.Singer and J.Singer (eds), Handbook of Children and Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 375–93.(2010) ‘Commentary: mismeasurement of children's understanding of the persuasive intent of advertising’, Journal of Children and Media, 4 (1): 109–17.(2004) Report of the APA Task Force on Advertising and Children: Psychological Issues in the Increasing Commercialization of Childhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., , , , and (1941) ‘Remarks on administrative and critical communication research’, Studies in Philosophical and Social Sciences, 9: 2–16.(1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.(Lewis, P. M. (ed.) (1993) Alternative Media: Linking Global and Local. UNESCO Reports and Papers in Mass Communication No. 107. Paris: UNESCO.1989) The Invisible Medium: Public, Commercial and Community Radio. London: Macmillan.and (Lewis, J. and Miller, T. (eds) (2003) Critical Cultural Policy Studies: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.1998) ‘Audience research at the crossroads: the “implied audience” in media and cultural theory’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1 (2): 193–217.(2002) Young People and New Media: Childhood and the Changing Media Environment. London: Sage.(2003) The Changing Nature and Uses of Media Literacy. Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper No. 4. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.(2004) A Commentary on the Research Evidence Regarding the Effects of Food Promotion on Children. Report Prepared for the Market Research Department of the Office of Communications. London: Office of Communications (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21756/).(2005) ‘On the relation between audiences and publics’, in S.Livingstone (ed.), Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 17–41.(2006) New Research on Advertising Foods to Children: An Updated Review of the Literature [published as Annex 9 to the report, Television Advertising of Food and Drink Products to Children. London: Ofcom, March] (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21758/).(2008a) ‘Engaging with media - a matter of literacy?’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 1 (1): 51–62.(2008b) ‘Internet literacy: young people's negotiation of new online opportunities’, in T.McPherson (ed.), Unexpected Outcomes and Innovative Uses of Digital Media by Youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 101–21.(2009a) ‘On the mediation of everything. ICA Presidential address’, Journal of Communication, 59 (1): 1–18.(2009b) Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.([Page 206]2010) ‘Media literacy and media policy’ [in German], in B.Bachmair (ed.), Medienbildung in Riskanten Erlebniswelten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag, pp. 33–44.(2011) ‘Regulating the internet in the interests of children: emerging European and international approaches’, in R.Mansell and M.Raboy (eds), The Handbook on Global Media and Communication Policy (505–524). Oxford: Blackwell.(2004) Advertising ‘Unhealthy’ Foods to Children: Understanding Promotion in the Context of Children's Daily Lives. A Review of the Literature for the Market Research Department of the Office of Communications. London: Office of Communications.and (2006) ‘Does advertising literacy mediate the effects of advertising on children? A critical examination of two linked research literatures in relation to obesity and food choice’, Journal of Communication, 56: 560–84.and (1994) Talk on Television. London: Routledge.and (2007) ‘Representing citizens and consumers in media and communications regulation’, in The Politics of Consumption/The Consumption of Politics, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611: 51–65.and (2011) ‘The implied audience of communications policy making: regulating media in the interests of citizens and consumers’, in V.Nightingale (ed.), Handbook of Media Audiences. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 169–89.and (2007a) ‘Citizens and consumers: discursive debates during and after the Communications Act 2003’, Media, Culture & Society, 29 (4): 613–38., and (2007b) ‘Citizens, consumers and the citizen-consumer: articulating the interests at stake in media and communications regulation’, Discourse and Communication, 1 (1): 85–111., and (2005) Adult Media Literacy: A Review of the Literature. London: Ofcom., and (2011) ‘Media Literacy and the Communications Act: What has been achieved and what should be done?’LSE Media Policy Project Brief 2 (http://www.scribd.com/doc/57742814/Policy-Brief-Progress-in-digital-skills-has-stalled)., and (2007) ‘Consumers, citizens and regulation: case studies in financial services and communications regulation’, in M.Bevir and F.Trentmann (eds), Governance, Citizens, and Consumers: Agency and Resistance in Contemporary Politics. London: Palgrave. pp. 139–62.and (2008) ‘Public understanding of regimes of risk regulation: a report on focus group discussions with citizens and consumers’, Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Network (SCARR) Working Paper series (WP26) (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21445)., , and (1996) ‘The internet and US communication policy-making in historical and critical perspective’, Journal of Communication, 46 (1): 98–124.(1999) Rich Media Poor Democracy. New York: The New Press.(2005) Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity?Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies., and (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage.([Page 207]Majone, (1998) The rise of the regulatory state in Europe’, in R.Baldwin, C.Scott and C.Hood (eds), A Reader on Regulation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.2002) ‘From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies’,(Current Sociology, 50 (3): 407–26.2007) ‘Crossing boundaries with new media: introductory remarks for the panel on “the responsibility of the media’”, United Nations General Assembly Third Informal Thematic Debate on ‘Civilizations and the Challenge for Peace: Obstacles and Opportunities’, New York, 10–11 May.(2011) ‘New visions, old practices: policy and regulation in the internet era’, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 25 (1): 19–32.(2010) Digital Literacy in Canada: From Inclusion to Transformation. Ottawa: Media Awareness Network.(2007) Governing European Communications: From Unification to Coordination. Lanham, MD and Plymouth, MA: Lexington Books.(2009) Harm and Offence in Media Content: A Review of the Empirical Literature (and (2nd edition). Bristol: Intellect.2009) Accountability and the Public Interest in Broadcasting. London: Palgrave Macmillan.and (2010) ‘Governing public service broadcasting: “public value tests” in different national contexts’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 3 (2): 207–23.(2009) ‘Interactive food and beverage marketing: targeting adolescents in the digital age’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 45 (3): S18-S29.and (2006) ‘Unanswered questions in audience research’, The Communication Review, 9: 101–21.(1992) ‘Democratic citizenship and the political community’, in C.Mouffe (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 225–39.(2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.(1997) Connexity: How to Live in a Connected World. London: Chatto & Windus.(2005) ‘Public broadcasting and democratic culture: consumers, citizens, and communards’, in J.Wasko (ed.), A Companion to Television. Maiden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 174–98.(2008) ‘“Who's messing with my mind?” The implications of dual-process models for the ethics of advertising to children’, International Journal of Advertising. Special Issue on Brain Sciences, 27 (3): 447–70.and (NAO (National Audit Office) (2010) Ofcom: The Effectiveness of Converged Regulation. London: The Stationary Office.2003) Citizen-Consumers: New Labour's Marketplace Democracy. A Catalyst Working Paper. London: The Catalyst Forum.(Newman, J. (ed.) (2005) Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.NHS (2008) Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet: England, January 2008. London: The NHS Information Centre.NHS (2010) Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet: England, 2010. London: The NHS Information Centre.2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press., and ([Page 208]Ofcom (n.d.-a) How Will Ofcom Consult? Ofcom Consultation Guidelines. (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/how-will-ofcom-consult.)Ofcom (n.d.-b) Statutory Duties and Regulatory Principles, (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/what-is-ofcom/statutory-duties-and-regulatory-principles/)Ofcom (n.d.-c) A case study on public sector mergers and regulatory structures. (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/what-is-ofcom/a-case-study-on-public-sector-mergers-and-reguIatory-structures/)Ofcom (n.d.-d) Spectrum Strategy, (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/spectrum-strategy/.)Ofcom (n.d.-e) Report to the Secretary of State (Culture, Media and Sport) on the Media Ownership Rules, (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/morr/statement/)Ofcom (Office of Communications) (2004a) Annual Report, 2003/4. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2004b) Ofcom's Strategy and Priorities for the Promotion of Media Literacy: Consultation Document. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/strategymedialit/summary/medialit.pdf).Ofcom (2004c) Ofcom's Strategy and Priorities for the Promotion of Media Literacy: A Statement. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/strategymedialit/summary/strat_prior_statement.pdf).Ofcom (2004d) Child Obesity - Food Advertising in Context: Children's Food Choices, Parents’ Understanding and Influence, and the Role of Food Promotions. July, London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2004e) Licensing Community Radio. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2005a) Annual Plan, 2005/6. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2005b) Ofcom Review of Public Service Television Broadcasting, Phase 3: Competition for Quality. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/psb3/psb3.pdf).Ofcom (2005c) The Broadcasting Code. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2006a) Ofcom's Consumer Policy Statement. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/ocp/statement/statement.pdf).Ofcom (2006b) Media Literacy Audit: Report on Adult Media Literacy. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/media-literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/medialit_audit/).Ofcom (2006c) Ofcom Response to European Commission Consultation on Media Literacy. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2006d) Television Advertising of Food and Drink Products to Children: Options for New Restrictions. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2007 a) Taking Account of Consumer and Citizen Interest. Progress and Evaluation - 12 Months On. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2007b) The Future of Children's Television Programming: Research Report. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2008a) Citizens, Communications and Convergence. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/citizens/).Ofcom (2008b) The Digital Opportunity. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2008c) Public Service Broadcasting Review Phase 1: Summary of Consultation Responses. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2008d) Media Literacy Audit: Report on UK Adults’ Media Literacy. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/media-literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/ml_adult08/).Ofcom (2009a) Citizens’ Digital Participation: Research Report. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2009b) UK Adults’ Media Literacy: 2009 Interim Report. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/media-literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/uk_adults_ml/).[Page 209]Ofcom (2009c) Community Radio: Annual Report on the Sector 2008/2009. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/broadcast/radio-ops/cr_annualrpt0809.pdf).Ofcom (2010a) Citizens, Communications and Convergence: A Summary of Stakeholder Responses, and Our Next Steps. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/citizens/statement/Citizen_Statement.pdf).Ofcom (2010b) HFSS Advertising Restrictions: Final Review. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2010c) The Communication Markets Report. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2010d) Annual Report 2009/10. London: Ofcom/The Stationary Office.Ofcom (2010e) Report on Public Interest Test on the Proposed Acquisition of British Sky Broadcasting Group Pic by News Corporation. London: Ofcom.Ofcom (2010f) Community Radio: Annual Report on the Sector 2009/2010. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/radio/community/annualreports/09-10/).Ofcom (2011) Draft Annual Plan 2011/12. London: Ofcom (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/draftaplll2/).O'Malley, T. and Jones, J. (eds) (2009) The Peacock Committee and UK Broadcasting Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.2008) Better Living Through Reality TV: Television and Post-Welfare Citizenship. Oxford: Blackwell.and (Outhwaite, W. (ed.). (1996). The Habermas Reader. Cambridge: Polity.2003) An Analysis of the Hastings Review. London: Food Advertising Unit.and (2010) Sexualisation of Young People Review. London: Home Office Publication.(2010) A Tangled Web. London: Consumer Focus.(2010) Public Administration Committee - Fifth Report Smaller Government: Shrinking the Quango State. Westminster: House of Commons (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmpubadm/537/53702.htm).(2010) ‘Media governance: a new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 3 (2): 134–49.(2002) The Report of the Joint Committee on the Draft Communications Bill (25 July 2002). House of Commons and House of Lords. London: The Stationery Office (http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/jt200102/jtselect/jtcom/169/169.pdf)(Puttnam, D. (2006) ‘The continuing need to advance the public interest’, in Ofcom (ed.), Communications: The Next Decade. London: Ofcom, pp. 125–138.2007) ‘Global media policy - defining the field’, Global Media and Communication, 3 (3): 343–61.(2008) ‘Dreaming in Technicolor: the future of PSB in a world beyond broadcasting’, Convergence, 14 (3): 361–5.(2001) ‘Media policy, audiences, and social demand: research at the interface of policy studies and audience studies’, Television & New Media, 2 (2): 95–115., , and (2003) ‘The dilemma of social demand: shaping media policy in new civic contexts’, Gazette, 65 (4–5): 323–9., and (2005) The Media and Globalization. London: Sage.(2005) ‘Our.info’, in J.Lloyd and J.Seaton (eds), What Can be Done? Making the media and politics better. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 146–158.([Page 210]2006) Community Media: A Global Introduction. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.(2003) Speech to the Royal Television Society Dinner, 4 December (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2003/12/richards_20031204).(2004). Speech to the Westminster Media Forum, 25 May, Ofcom Review of Public Service Broadcasting, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media_office/speeches_presentations/richards_20040525(2009) Speech at Radio 3.0, 21 May (http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2009/05/22/radio-a-vital-part-of-the-media-landscape-extract-from-ed-richards-speech-at-radio-3-0-21-may-2009/).(2005) The future of public service broadcasting and the BBC, in A.Peacock (ed.), Public Service Broadcasting without the BBC?London: IEA.and (2004) The “Hybrid State”: New Labour's response to the problem of governance’, in S.Ludlam and M. J.Smith (eds), Governing as New Labour. London: Palgrave.and (Robinson, C. (ed.) (2007) Utility Regulation in Competitive Markets: Pproblems and Progress. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.1981) ‘Age difference in children's responses to television advertising: an information processing approach’, Journal of Consumer Research, 8: 144–53.(1990) Governing the Soul: Technologies of Human Subjectivity. New York: Routledge.(1999) Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(Sarikakis, K. (ed.) (2007) Media and Cultural Policy in the European Union. Amsterdam: Rodopi.1989) ‘Public service broadcasting and modern public life’, Media Culture & Society, 11: 135–66.(1991) A Social History of British Broadcasting: 1922–1939, Serving the Nation. Oxford: Blackwell.and (2009) The Politics of Media and Cultural Policy. Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper Series No. 17. London: London School of Economics.(2011) Smoke and Mirrors? Media and Cultural Policy under the Coalition. Seminar presented at LSE, 12 January.(2001) Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design. London: Sweet & Maxwell.(2009) ‘It was the BBC wot won it’, in T.O'Malley and J.Jones (eds), The Peacock Committee and UK Broadcasting Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.and (2005) The Internet Playground: Children's Access, Entertainment, and Mis-education. New York: Peter Lang.(Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport (2001) Second Report. Westminster: House of Commons (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmcumeds/161/16103.htm#nl3)1987) ‘Media policy in Britain: Now you see it, now you don't.’ European Journal of Communication, 2: 269–288.(2004) ‘Universal service issues in converging communications environments: the case of the UK’, Telecommunications Policy, 28 (3–4): 233–48.(2006) ‘The politics of UK television policy: the making of Ofcom’, Media, Culture & Society, 28 (6): 929–40.(1984) ‘New directions for critical communications research’, Media, Culture & Society, 6: 205–17.([Page 211]2007) ‘Literacy, learning and technology studies’, in R.Andrews and C.Haythornthwaite (eds), The SAGE Handbook of E-Learning Research. London: Sage, pp. 394–415.(2003) ‘Regulating the regulators? An assessment of institutional structures and procedural rules of national regulatory authorities’, International Journal of Communications Law & Policy, Winter (8). Available online at: http://www.ijdp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_1-8-2004.pdf.(2003) Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Questions. Maidenhead: Open University Press.(2010) Sounds of Your Life: The History of Independent Radio in the UK. New Barnet, Herts: John Libby.(2002) ‘Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors’, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102 (3): S40-S51., and (1984) Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(2003) ‘What's new in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice’, Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5 (2): 77–91.(2004) ‘Citizens, audiences, customers and players’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7 (3): 363–80.(Tambini, D. (2006) ‘What citizens need to know: digital exclusion, information inequality and rights’, in Ofcom (ed.), Communications: The Next Decade. London: Ofcom, pp. 112–24.2010) ‘Ofcom cuts are grave assault on freedom’, The Guardian, 18 October.(2008) Codifying Cyberspace: Communications Self-regulation in the Age of Internet Convergence. London: Routledge., and (2003) Between Hierarchies and Market: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization. Oxford. Oxford University Press.(1995) The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1999) Globalisation and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2004) Citizenship, Culture and Public Service Broadcasting. Submission to Ofcom's Review of Public Service Television Broadcasting, Phase 1 ‘Is Television Special?’ 14 June, 2004.(http://www.bftv.ac.uk/policy/ofcom040614.htm).and (2006) ‘Knowing consumers - histories, identities, practices: an introduction’, in F.Trentmann (ed.), The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World. Oxford: Berg, pp. pp. 1–27.(UNESCO (n.d.) Media and Information Literacy (http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URLJD=15886&URL_DO=DO_PRINTPAGE&URL_SECTION=201.html).2009) ‘Contextualizing the broadcast era: nation, commerce and constraint’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625: 60–73.(2003) ‘Media policy paradigm shifts: towards a new communications policy paradigm’, European Journal of Communication, 18 (2): 181–207.and (2008) ‘Towards a new communication policy paradigm’, in I.Fernandez Alonso and M. D.Moragas i Spa (eds), Communication and Cultural Policies in Europe. Barcelona: Government of Catalonia, Department of the President.and (2009) The Young and the Digital: What the Migration to Social Networking Sites, Games, and Anytime, Anywhere Media Means for Our Future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.([Page 212]1994) ‘Victim, consumer, or commodity? Audience models in communication policy’, in J. S.Ettema and D. C.Whitney (eds), Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience. London: Sage, pp. 19–37.and (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(WHO (World Health Organization) (2000) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic (No. 894). Geneva: WHO.WHO (2002) World Health Report. Geneva: WHO.1887) ‘The study of administration’, cited in Du Gay, P. (2000) In Praise of Bureaucracy. London: Sage.(1996) ‘Technologies as cultural artefacts’, in W. H.Dutton (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–102.(2010) The Failure of the Lisbon Strategy (http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/4478).(2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.(2006) ‘Conclusion II: the modes and dynamics of global governance’, in M.Koenig-Archibugi and M.Zürn (eds), New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 236–55.and (