Making Societies: The Historical Construction of Our World

Books

William G. Roy

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Sociology for a New Century

    A Pine Forge Press Series

    Edited by Charles Ragin, Wendy Griswold, and Larry Griffin

    Sociology for a New Century brings the best current scholarship to today's students in a series of short texts authored by leaders of a new generation of social scientists. Each book addresses its subject from a comparative, historical, and global perspective and, in doing so, connects social science to the wider concerns of students seeking to make sense of our dramatically changing world.

    • An Invitation to Environmental Sociology Michael M. Bell
    • Global Inequalities York W. Bradshaw and Michael Wallace
    • Schools and Societies Steven Brint
    • Economy/Society: Markets, Meanings, and Social Structures Bruce Carruthers and Sarah Babb
    • How Societies Change Daniel Chirot
    • Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World Stephen Cornell and Douglas Hartmann
    • The Sociology of Childhood William A. Corsaro
    • Cultures and Societies in a Changing World Wendy Griswold
    • Crime and Disrepute John Hagan
    • Gods in the Global Village: The World's Religions in Sociological Perspective Lester R. Kurtz
    • Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change John Markoff
    • Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, Second Edition Philip McMichael
    • Aging, Social Inequality, and Public Policy Fred C. Pampel
    • Constructing Social Research Charles C. Ragin
    • Women and Men at Work Barbara Reskin and Irene Padavic
    • Making Societies: The Historical Construction of Our World William G. Roy
    • Cities in a World Economy, Second Edition Saskia Sassen
    • Gender, Family, and Social Movements Suzanne Staggenborg
    • Law/Society: Origins, Interactions, and Change John Sutton

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Dedication

    To Alice, for constructing an enchanted reality

    Illustrations

    Figures
    • FIGURE 1.1 Boundaries and Gradients 15
    • FIGURE 2.1 Black Figured Lekythos (Oil Flask), 500–490 b.c.e. 34
    • FIGURE 2.2 The Aztec Calendar 36
    • FIGURE 3.1 Two Projections of the World 58
    • FIGURE 3.2 The T-O Map, 7th Century A.D. 60
    • FIGURE 4.1 “Scientific” Drawing of Head Shapes 91
    • FIGURE 4.2 Nonverbal Army Intelligence Test 93
    • FIGURE 4.3 Political Cartoon Equating Blacks and Irish in Harper's Weekly (1876) 99
    • FIGURE 5.1 Munitions Factory, Bridgeport, Connecticut, in Harper's Weekly (about 1880) 121
    • FIGURE 5.2 Boy Scouts to the Rescue (in Punch 1909) 139
    • FIGURE 5.3 Timetable of the Lowell Mills 145
    • FIGURE 5.4 Rosie the Riveter 147
    • FIGURE 5.5 Public and Private Life in 1890 (Harper's New Monthly Magazine) 149–150
    • FIGURE 6.1 A Tenant Renews His Vows 168
    Table
    • TABLE 1.1. The Category of Family in Anglo-European Culture 17

    About the Author

    William G. Roy is Professor of Sociology at UCLA and author of Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Corporation in America (1997). He has won the Luckman Distinguished Teaching Award at UCLA and the Distinguished Contribution to Teaching Award from the American Sociological Association. His current research concerns American folk music, social movements, and race.

    About the Publisher

    Pine Forge Press is a new educational publisher, dedicated to publishing innovative books and software throughout the social sciences. On this and any other of our publications, we welcome your comments, ideas, and suggestions. Please call or write to:

    Pine Forge Press

    A Sage Publications Company

    31 St. James Ave., Suite 510 Boston, MA 02116 617–753–7512

    E-mail: sdr@pfp.sagepub.com

    Visit our World Wide Web site, your direct link to a multitude of online resources:

    http://www.pineforge.com

    Foreword

    Sociology for a New Century offers the best of current sociological thinking to today's students. The goal of the series is to prepare students and—in the long run—the informed public for a world that has changed dramatically in the past three decades and one that continues to astonish.

    These goals reflect important changes that have taken place in sociology. The discipline has become broader in orientation, with an evergrowing interest in research that is comparative, historical, or transnational in orientation. Sociologists are less focused on “American” society as the pinnacle of human achievement and more sensitive to global processes and trends. They also have become less insulated from surrounding social forces. In the 1970s and 1980s, sociologists were so obsessed with constructing a science of society that they saw impenetrability as a sign of success. Today, there is a greater effort to connect sociology to the ongoing concerns and experiences of the informed public.

    Each book in this series offers in some way a comparative, historical, transnational, or global perspective to help broaden students' vision. Students need to comprehend the diversity in today's world and to understand the sources of diversity. This knowledge can challenge the limitations of conventional ways of thinking about social life. At the same time, students need to understand that issues that may seem specifically “American” (e.g., the women's movement, an aging population bringing a strained social security and health care system, racial conflict, national chauvinism, etc.) are shared by many other countries. Awareness of commonalities undercuts the tendency to view social issues and questions in narrowly American terms and encourages students to seek out the experiences of others for the lessons they offer. Finally, students also need to grasp phenomena that transcend national boundaries—trends and processes that are supranational (e.g., environmental degradation). Recognition of global processes stimulates student awareness of causal forces that transcend national boundaries, economies, and politics.

    If the goal of Sociology for a New Century is to broaden the students' vision, no book in the series is more ambitious toward attaining that goal than William Roy's Making Societies. Roy helps students question the most “natural” of categories: time, space, gender, race, and class. Leading them through examples drawn from around the world, he shows how these categories are social constructions, historically formed, ideologically loaded, and subject to change. This will be a revelation to many readers. Like all revelations, it will be profoundly unsettling, for students will be encouraged to question not only what they know but also the conceptual frameworks they use when they claim to understand anything. It is the series editors' belief that this unsettling, this provocation, will open new ways of thinking about the social world, how it is, and how it might be.

    Preface

    One of the greatest challenges of teaching sociology is to lift students out of their “natural attitude,” the tenacious tendency to identify the familiar with the inevitable. Indeed, one of the deepest changes in sociology over the past decade or so has been the fuller development of social constructionist perspectives on the social world. Conventional sociology, both mainstream functionalism and its emancipatory challengers, has been criticized for its essentialist assumptions about social life, charging that the failure to problematize why social reality exists the way it does misses the opportunity to explain these patterns and the possibility to transcend them. Issues of race and gender have moved from documentation of inequality between races and genders to asking why races and gender exist. Questions of class have shifted from the degree of disparity or the rates of mobility to the historical origins of structured inequality. At the same time, sociologists have joined other social scientists in examining the fundamental parameters of experience such as time and space. Challenging the rationalist perspectives that treat time and space as immanent properties of nature, scholars have problematized how social time and place structure the way people relate to each and underlie institutions.

    These issues of social construction can begin to chip away at students' natural attitude by demonstrating that the world they take for granted as natural and inevitable could have, and indeed has, been different. Not all societies divide people into fixed races, assign everyone to only one of two sexes, or accord higher status to those who accumulate wealth. Many societies treat time as a cycle more than a line, and almost none can imagine it as a “thing” that can be sold, saved, wasted, or spent. Few societies think of space in terms of abstract coordinates that can have meaning apart from the activities that happen in particular places. If the things people take for granted as natural are really socially constructed, we must then seek explanations of why particular relations arise. Why does Anglo-European society divide people into races and genders that structure the opportunities they have and the material comforts they are likely to enjoy while pretending that the vast wealth possessed by a few is within the grasp of anyone? Why have complex time systems that barely affect the way people live evolved into standardized systems that permeate social life so pervasively that people feel trapped by time? Why has the conception of space changed from a place where social activities occur to a commodity so basic to the economic system that the language designates areas of land as “real” property?

    Presenting social construction as an issue of explanation rather than one of existence can keep the analysis from wandering into the sophistry of postmodern relativism. The understanding that social reality is constructed need not imply that it is any less real than “natural” reality. Rather than dwell on how “real” social patterns are, it is more constructive to discover why the patterns have arisen and explore how they might be transformed. The consequences of distributing resources by race, gender, and class are very real to the members of society, even if those on the losing end are more acutely aware of their importance. The fact that most people must sell their time to live and use some of the payment to buy space is not just an issue for philosophical debate. At the same time, the search for explanation can imprint the contingent nature of realities that students initially assumed to be self-evident.

    The search for explanation also goes beyond the more microsociological perspective that originally gave rise to social constructionism. While challenging students to see how reality is constructed in their everyday lives certainly can jolt them out of their natural attitude and help them understand how social life is reproduced by mundane activity, this book is more concerned with showing how things could be different, both how they have been different in other societies and how an understanding of differences in the past can open vistas to differences in the future. The chapters try to show how things that we normally take for granted as natural have been different in other societies and how the patterns of Anglo-European society have arisen historically. Since it would be impossible to authoritatively cover all aspects of either, I have chosen a sample of contrasts in other societies to unharness preexisting assumptions about iron necessity and then give a plausible, though rarely definitive, account of how Anglo-European patterns developed. Though many of these accounts are contested by scholars, I felt that it was pedagogically more important to present solid, coherent accounts of how social construction works than getting students bogged down in debates.

    Finally, the macrohistorical emphasis offers an appropriate scaffold for presenting basic concepts of social explanation too often missing from social constructionist perspectives. The issue of why some patterns become adopted rather than others elicits the issue of power. Some people have had a greater hand in developing patterns than others, and some have benefited from the patterns more than others. Eschewing models of history based on either popular consent or elite hegemony, the explanations in this book probe how popular movements have interacted with powerful groups. Much of this interaction has taken place in the context and construction of social institutions. The social relations of time, space, race, gender, and class are not only shaped by dominant institutions but also, to some extent, constitute them. The capitalist economy is based on the commodification of time and space. Chattel slavery, the capitalist form of slavery, helped give rise to the modern concept of race while making possible the industrial revolution that enabled capitalism to spread throughout the world. The modern state has standardized time and space and codified race, gender, and class into law. As discussed in the final chapter, the rise of nations and nationalism reflected and shaped all five issues. Even secondary institutions such as education reflect prevailing time and space conceptions while socializing new generations into them. The role that education plays in reproducing racial, gender, and class inequality is well known.

    The book has selected five kinds of socially constructed reality: time, space, race, gender, and class. There is no compelling logic for choosing these; other constructions could have been just as profitably included: nature, science, family, religion, art, and even sociology. I chose time and space because they are so basic and the forms of inequality because they are so consequential for contemporary society and everyday life. The book begins with time and space because they are less controversial than the forms of inequality and because they provide a starker challenge to the natural attitude. If the reader can grasp how time and space are socially constructed, the concepts can be applied in a more sophisticated fashion in exploring the sensitive issues of race, gender, and class.

    This book could not have been possible without the support and contributions of many friends and colleagues; any virtues it might possess are much enhanced by their efforts. I have wanted to write a book for Pine Forge Press ever since conversations with Steve Rutter, when he was planning the enterprise, inspired me to imagine what a book written for students could be. His contribution far exceeds the ordinary publisher, helping develop the book's vision, providing feedback and en-couragement throughout the process, and tolerantly abiding my missed deadlines. Wendy Griswold was the point person throughout the writing process for the talented and committed series editors, with Larry Griffin and Charles Ragin providing special insight in the early stages. I was blessed with an uncommonly conscientious and talented group of academic reviewers:

    Lisa Brush, University of Pittsburgh

    Joann DeFiore, University of Washington, Bothell

    Kelly Moore, Barnard College, Columbia University

    Tracy Ore, St. Cloud State University

    Teresa Swartz, University of Minnesota

    Idee Winfield, College of Charleston

    I am also grateful to developmental editors Kathy Field and Mark LaFleur, who materially improved on my earlieer drafts. Ann Makarias, assistant to the publisher, skillfully helped shepherd the manuscript through the editing process. She was always available with a cheerful and constructive answer to my queries and concerns. Gillian Dickens helped make my often mangled prose readable. Barbara Moroncini far exceeded the expectations of an undergraduate research assistant, reading the manuscript from the perspective of an intelligent student, finding typos and infelicities I missed while correcting the text, tracking down sources I thought were lost, discovering illustrations that not only represented but also enhanced concepts, and cheerfully responding to my panicked call for help when deadlines approached.

    Many friends, colleagues, and graduate students enriched the ideas, pointed me to important sources, reined in my wandering from the topic, corrected my errors, and improved my writing. Ron Aminzade, Tyrone Harvey, Cathie Lee, Jennifer Lee, Ruth Milkman, Ruth Stedman, Susan Stockdale, and the members of the UCLA Workshop on Comparative Social Analysis read and made valuable comments on the chapters. Patricia Ahmed was hired to find material for Chapter 3 on space but wrote it up so eloquently that it would have been unjust to not list her as a coauthor. The book has its origins in a course in UCLA's honor's collegium on “Time in Society and History” and was expanded in an undergraduate course, “Comparative-Historical Sociology.” It incorporates many ideas I learned from the students in those classes. My wife Alice not only provided the love, support, and tolerance authors typically extol but also made an intellectual contribution. Drawing on the insight that enabled her to do a book on the construction of truth as related to plagiarism and intellectual property, she helped sharpen the central ideas and provided feedback on the entire manuscript.

  • References

    Agnew, John. 1996. “Time Into Space: The Myth of ‘Backward’ Italy in Modern Europe.”Time and Society5 (1): 27–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463X96005001002
    Allen, Theodore W.1997. The Invention of the White Race: The Origin of Racial Oppression in Anglo-America. London: Verso.
    Almaguer, Tomas. 1994. Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Andersen, Milton L.1994. “The Many and Varied Social Constructions of Intelligence.” pp. 119–38 in Constructing the Social, edited by T. R.Sarbin and J. I.Kitsuse. London: Sage.
    Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.
    Auden, W. H.1966. About the House. New York: Random House.
    Austin, Alfredo Lopes. 1997. Tamoanchan, Tlalocan: Places of Mist. Translated by BernardR. and Thelma Ortizde Montellano. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
    Aveni, Anthony F.1995. Empires of Time: Calendars, Clocks and Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
    Banton, Michael. 1998. Racial Theories.
    2nd ed.
    Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583407
    Basedow, H.1929. The Australian Aborigine. Adelaide, Australia: Preece and Sons.
    Bederman, Gail. 1995. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041490.001.0001
    Berger, Peter L. and Thomas, Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.
    Biernacki, Richard. 1995. The Fabrication of Labor: Germany and Britain, 1640–1914. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Bloom, Alan D.1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Boorstein, Daniel J.1985. The Discoverers: A History of Man's Search to Know His World and Himself. New York: Vintage.
    Boswell, John.1994. Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe. New York: Villard.
    Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Edited and translated by RichardNice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558764
    Buranen, L. and A. M.Roy, eds. 1999. Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Burns, Lee. 1993. Busy Bodies. New York: Norton.
    Casper, Lynne M. and KenBryson. 1998. Current Population Reports: Household and Family Characteristics: Population Characteristics. March 1998 (Update). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
    Charrad, Mounira M.1999. “Bringing in Tribe: Beyond a State/Class Paradigm.”Newsletter of the Comparative & Historical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association11 (3): 1–3.
    Chojnacki, Stanley. 1994. “Subaltern Patriarchs: Patrician Bachelors in Renaissance Venice.” pp. 73–90 in Medieval Masculinities: Regarding Men in the Middle Ages, edited by C. A.Lees. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
    Connell, Robert W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Cooper, Susan F.1870. “Female Suffrage: A Letter to the Christian Women of America.”Harper's Magazine41:438–46.
    Cope, Edward D. [1888] 1985. “The Relations of the Sexes to Government.” pp. 210–16 in Men's Ideas/Women's Realities: Popular Science, 1870–1915, edited by L. M.Newman. New York: Pergamon.
    Cornell, Stephen and DouglasHartmann. 1998. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
    Cott, Nancy F.1977. The Bonds of Womanhood: Women's Sphere in New England, 1780–1835. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Cowan, James. 1982. The Mountain Men. French Forest, New South Wales: A. H. and A. W. Reed.
    Cronin, Vincent. 1964. Louis XIV. London: Collins.
    Danziger, Sheldon and PeterGottschalk. 1995. America Unequal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    DeParle, Jason. 1994. “Better Work Than Welfare? But What If There's Neither?”New York Times, 18 December, Section 6, p. 44.
    Dilke, O. A. W.1985. Greek and Roman Maps. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Dilke, O. A. W.1987. Maps in the Service of the State: Roman Cartography to the End of the Augusta Era.” pp. 201–211 in History of Cartography: Vol. 1. Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean, edited by J. B.Harley and DavidWoodward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    DiMaggio, Paul. 1982a. “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston: Part II. The Classification and Framing of American Art.”Media, Culture, and Society4:303–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344378200400104
    DiMaggio, Paul. 1982b. “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America.”Media, Culture, and Society4:33–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344378200400104
    DiMaggio, Paul. 1992. “Cultural Boundaries and Structural Change: The Extension of the High Culture Model to Theater, Opera, and the Dance, 1900–1940.” pp. 21–57 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by M.Lamont and M.Fournier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    DiMaggio, Paul and MichaelUseem. 1978. “Cultural Democracy in a Period of Cultural Expansion.”Social Problems26:179–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800281
    “Dred Scott v. Sanford.” [1857] 1995. pp. 322–25 in Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: An Integrated Study, edited by P. S.Rothenberg. New York: St. Martin's.
    Dubbert, Joe L.1980. “Progressivism and the Masculinity Crisis.” pp. 303–20 in The American Man, edited by E.Pleck and J. H.Pleck. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Durkheim, Emile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
    Elias, Norbert. 1992. Time: An Essay. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Evans-Pritchard, E. E.1939. “Nuer Time-Reckoning.”Africa12:189–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1155085
    Faderman, Lillian. 1991. Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers. New York: Penguin.
    Faludi, Susan. 1991. Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. New York: Anchor.
    Ferrante, Joan and Prince, Brown, Jr.1998. The Social Construction of Race and Ethnicity in the United States. New York: Longman.
    Filene, Peter G.1998. Him/Her/Self.
    3rd ed.
    Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Fischer, Claude S., MichaelHout, MartinSanchez Jankowski, Samuel R.Lucas, and KimVoss. 1996. Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Foucault, Michel. 1987. History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Fraser, J. T.1987. Time: The Familiar Stranger. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
    Fraser, J. T.1990. Of Time, Passion, and Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Fraser, J. T.1994. “Calendar: Western.” pp. 75–80 in The Encyclopedia of Time, edited by S. L.Macy. New York: Garland.
    Gans, Herbert J.1974. Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Basic Books.
    Gardner, Carol Brooks. 1994. “Out of Place: Gender, Public Places, and Situational Disadvantage.” pp. 335–55 in NowHere: Space, Time and Modernity, edited by R.Friedland and D.Boden. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Gardner, Howard. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
    Gilmore, David D.1990. Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Gilroy, Paul. 1992. There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
    Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 1999. “The Social Construction and Institutionalization of Gender and Race: An Integrative Framework.” pp. 3–43 in Revisioning Gender, edited by M. M.Ferree, J.Lorber, and B. B.Hess. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Gough, E. Kathleen. 1974. “Nayar: Central Kerala.” pp. 298–384 in Matrilineal Kinship, edited by D.Schneider and E. K.Gough. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Gould, Stephen Jay. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.
    Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Gress, David. 1998. The Idea of the West and Its Opponents: From Plato to NATO. New York: Free Press.
    Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Hale, Grace Elizabeth. 1998. Making Whiteness: The Culture of Segregation in the South, 1890–1940. New York: Pantheon.
    Hall, Edward T.1969. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
    Halle, David.1993. Inside Culture: Art and Class in the American Home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Haney Lopez, Ian F.1996. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.
    Hannaford, Ivan. 1996. Race: The History of an Idea in the West. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Hansen, Karen V.1991. “‘Helped Put in a Quilt’: Men's Work and Male Intimacy in Nineteenth-Century New England.” pp. 83–103 in The Social Construction of Gender, edited by J.Lorber and S. A.Farrell. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Hantover, Jeffrey P.1998. “The Boy Scouts and the Validation of Masculinity.” pp. 101–08 in Men's Lives,
    4th ed.
    , edited by M. S.Kimmel and M. A.Messner. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Harris, Cheryl I.1993. “Whiteness as Property.”Harvard Law Review106:1707–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1341787
    Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
    Hayden, Dolores. 1984. The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities. New York: Norton.
    Herdt, Gilbert. 1993a. “Introduction: Third Sexes and Third Genders.” pp. 21–84 in Third Sex Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History, edited by G.Herdt. New York: Zone.
    Herdt, Gilbert. 1993b. “Mistaken Sex: Culture, Biology and the Third Sex in New Guinea.” pp. 419–46 in Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History, edited by G.Herdt. New York: Zone.
    Herrnstein, Richard J. and CharlesMurray. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
    Hewlett, S. A. (1986). A Lesser Life: The Myth of Women's Liberation in America. New York: Warner.
    Hobsbawm, Eric J. and TerenceRanger. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Hochschild, Arlie Russell with AnneMachung. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.
    Holstein, James A. and Jaber F.Gubrium. 1994. “Constructing Family: Descriptive Practice and Domestic Order.” pp. 232–50 in Constructing the Social, edited by T. R.Sarbin and J. I.Kitsuse. London: Sage.
    Horwitz, Morton. 1977. The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Ignatiev, Noel. 1995. How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
    Jacobson, Matthew Frye. 1998. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Jurczyk, Karin. 1998. “Time in Women's Everyday Lives: Between Self-Deter-mination and Conflicting Demands.”Time & Society7 (2): 283–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463X98007002007
    Kain, Roger and ElizabethBaigent. 1992. The Cadastral Map in the Service of the State: A History of Property Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Kimmel, Michael S.1987. “The Contemporary ‘Crisis’ of Masculinity in Historical Perspective.” pp. 121–53 in The Making of Masculinities: The New Men's Studies, edited by H.Brod. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
    Kimmel, Michael S.1993. American Manhood: Transformations in Masculinity From the Revolution to the Modern Era. New York: Basic Books.
    Kimmel, Michael S.1996. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. New York: Free Press.
    Konrad, George and IvanSzelenyi. 1979. The Intellectual on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    Konvitz, Josef.1987. Cartography in France 1660–1848: Science, Engineering and Statecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Lamont, Michèle. 1997. “Money, Morals, and Manners.” pp. 224–40 in Sociology: Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life, edited by D. M.Newman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
    Lamont, Michèle and MarcelFournier. 1992. “Introduction.” pp. 1–20 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by M.Lamont and M.Fournier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Landes, David. 1983. Revolution in Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender From the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Leccardi, Carmen. 1996. “Rethinking Social Time: Feminist Perspectives.”Time & Society5 (2): 169–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463X96005002003
    LeGoff, Jacques. 1980. Time, Work, and Culture in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Levine, Lawrence W.1988. Highbrow, Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Lewis, Martin W. and Karen E.Wigen. 1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Logan, John R.1976. “Industrialization and the Stratification of Cities in a Suburban Region.”American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 333–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226312
    Logan, John R. and Harvey L.Molotch. 1988. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power From the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570896
    Martin, Thomas. 1996. Ancient Greece: From Prehistoric to Hellenistic Times. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Marx, Anthony W.1998. Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of the United States, South Africa, and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Massey, Douglas S. and Nancy A.Denton. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    McLeish, John. 1992. Number. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
    McNamara, Jo Ann. 1994. “The Herrenfrage: The Restructuring of the Gender System, 1050–1150.” pp. 3–29 in Medieval Masculinities: Regarding Men in the Middle Ages, edited by C. A.Lees. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Messner, Michael. 1987. “The Meaning of Success: The Athletic Experience and the Development of Male Identity.” pp. 193–209 in The Making of Masculinities: The New Men's Studies, edited by H.Brod. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
    Molotch, Harvey. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.”American Journal of Sociology82:309–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226311
    More, Hannah. 1787. Sacred Dramas: Chiefly Intended for Young Persons: The Subjects Taken From the Bible: To Which Are Added: Reflections of King Hezekiah, and Sensibility, a Poem. Philadelphia: Printed for Thomas Dobson.
    Mundy, Barbara. 1996. The Mapping of New Spain: Indigenous Cartography and the Maps of the Relaciones Geograficas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Myers, Fred R.1986. Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place and Politics Among Western Desert Aborigines. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    Naidis, Mark. 1970. The Second British Empire: 1783–1965. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Newman, David M.2000. Sociology: Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life.
    3rd ed.
    Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
    O'Malley, Michael. 1990. Keeping Watch: A History of American Time. New York: Viking.
    Omi, Michael and HowardWinant. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s.
    2nd ed.
    New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
    Opperman, Renee, et al. 1984. “Prehistoric Cosmology in Mesoamerica and South America.” pp. 4–16 in Occasional Publications in Anthropology. Greeley: University of Northern Colorado Press.
    Oyèwùmí, Oyeronke. 1997. The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Paolucci, Gabriella. 1996. “Time Shattered: The Postindustrial City and Women's Temporal Experiences.”Time & Society5 (3): 265–81.
    Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Patterson, Orlando. 1982. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Peterson, Richard A. and AlbertSimkus. 1992. “How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups.” pp. 152–86 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by M.Lamont and M.Fournier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Poggi, Franco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon.
    Polanyi, Livia. 1997. “Interview With Deirdre McCloskey.”Challenge40 (1): 16–29.
    Pollner, Melvin. 1987. Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Pred, Allan. 1990. Making Histories and Constructing Human Geographies: The Local Transformation of Practical Power Relations and Consciousness. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    Roediger, David R.1991. The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. New York: Verso.
    Rossum, Gerhard Dohrn-van. 1996. History of the Hour: Clocks and Modern Temporal Orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Rotundo, E. Anthony. 1983. “Body and Soul: Changing Ideals of American Middle-Class Manhood.”journal of Social History16 (4): 23–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jsh/16.4.23
    Rotundo, E. Anthony. 1993. American Manhood: Transformations in Masculinity From the Revolution to the Modern Era. New York: Basic Books.
    Rutz, Henry J.1994. “Primitive Time-Reckoning.” pp. 496–97 in Encyclopedia of Time, edited by S. L.Macey. New York: Garland.
    Ryan, Mary P.1981. Cradle of the Middle Class: The Family in Oneida County, New York, 1790–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Sacks, Karen Brodkin. 1998. “How Did Jews Become White Folks?” pp. 78–102 in Race, edited by S.Gregory and R.Sanjek. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    Samson, Basil. 1974. “Economic Structures of the Bantu.” pp. 135–175 in The Bantu Peoples of Southern Africa, edited by W. D.Hammond-Tooke. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
    Sanderson, Stephen K.1999. Macrosociology: An Introduction to Human Societies.
    4th ed.
    New York: Longman.
    Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. 1986. The Railway journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Schwartz, Barry. 1983. “George Washington and the Whig Conception of Heroic Leadership.”American Sociological Review48 (1): 18–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095142
    “Scientists Say Race Has No Biological Basis.”1995. Los Angeles Times, 20 February, A1.
    Sennett, Richard. 1974. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Vintage.
    Shaw, Margaret. 1974. “Material Culture.” pp. 85–126 in The Bantu Peoples of Southern Africa, edited by W. D.Hammond-Tooke. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
    Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.
    Simon, Joel. 1997. “Prophecy, Plague and Plunder.”Amicus journal19:28–34.
    Smedley, Audrey. 1993. Race in North America: Origin and Evolution of a Worldview. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    Smith, Anthony D.1983. Theories of Nationalism. London: Duckworth.
    Soja, Edward W.1994. “Postmodern Geographies.” pp. 127–63 in NowHere: Space, Time and Modernity, edited by R.Friedland and D.Boden. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Sorokin, Pitirim and Robert K.Merton. 1990. “Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis.” pp. 56–66 in The Sociology of Time, edited by J.Hassard. New York: St. Martin's.
    Spain, Daphne. 1992. Gendered Spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    Standage, Tom. 1998. The Victorian Internet. New York: Walker and Company.
    Standbury, Peter. 1977. The Moving Frontier: Aspects of Aboriginal-European Interaction in Australia. Sydney, Australia: Charter.
    Stimson, Henry A.1904. “The Small Business as a School of Manhood.”Atlantic Monthly93 (557): 337–40.
    Stuard, Susan Mosher. 1994. “Burdens of Matrimony: Husbanding and Gender in Medieval Italy.” pp. 61–71 in Medieval Masculinities: Regarding Men in the Middle Ages, edited by C. A.Lees. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Takaki, Ronald. 1990. Iron Cages: Race and Culture in 19th Century America. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Thomas, William I. and Dorothy SwaineThomas. 1928. The Child in America. New York: Knopf.
    Thompson, E. P.1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.”Past and Present50 (February): 76–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76
    Thrift, Nigel. 1996. Spatial Formations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222362
    Thrower, Norman J. W.1996. Maps and Civilization: Cartography in Culture and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Tilly, Charles, ed. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Tilly, Louise. 1971. “The Food Riot as a Form of Political Conflict in France.”Journal of Interdisciplinary History2:23–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202442
    Trachtenberg, Alan. 1981. The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age. New York: Hill and Wang.
    Turner, A. J.1994. “Instruments of Time Measurement to Ca. A. D. 1275.” pp. 304–12 in Encyclopedia of Time, edited by S. L.Macey. New York: Garland.
    Vandevelde, Kenneth J.1980. “The New Property of the Nineteenth Century: The Development of the Modern Concept of Property.”Buffalo Law Review29:325–67.
    Whitman, Edward. 1952. World Time Differences. London: Whitman.
    Wilford, John Noble. 1982. The Map Makers. New York: Vintage.
    Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Willoughby, W. C.1923. Race Problems in the blew Africa. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
    Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Wolf, Eric. 1982. Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Wolpert, Stanley. 1997. New History of India. London: Oxford University Press.
    Woodward, C. Vann. 1969. Tom Watson: Agrarian Rebel. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Wyckoff, William K.1989. “Landscapes of Private Power and Wealth.” pp. 335–54 in The Making of the American Landscape, edited by M. P.Conzen. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
    Yerkes, R. M. (Ed.). (1921). Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences: Vol. 15. Psychological Examining in the United States Army. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10619-000
    Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1979. Patterns of Time in Hospital Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1985. The Seven Day Circle: The History and Meaning of the Week. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1991. The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.

    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website