Learning and Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards: Primary and Early Years

Books

David Barber, Linda Cooper & Graham Meeson

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    The Authors

    David Barber is currently the e-learning Co-ordinator and teaching fellow at Bishop Grosseteste University College and provides advice and training for college staff and students on the use of learning technologies. Active in a number of regional and national groups, David is interested in the promotion of ICT for teaching and research in all educational sectors.

    Linda Cooper is a Senior Lecturer on the BA Honours degree programme in Primary education at Bishop Grosseteste University College in Lincoln; she is responsible for delivering the ICT content course. Linda has been a primary school teacher and an ICT co-ordinator. She studied for an MSc in Information Systems and specialised in educational technology focussing on how the use of ICT can enhance teaching and learning in a classroom environment. She has become increasingly interested in interactive whiteboards and their benefits.

    Graham Meeson is a Senior Lecturer in Education Studies at Bishop Grosseteste University College, Lincoln and a former Deputy Head Teacher. He has worked on a variety of courses including ITT and Foundation degree programmes focussing on the area of ICT. In the past Graham has acted in a consultancy capacity for his local LEA. He is currently a school governor and has been fascinated by the introduction of interactive whiteboards witnessed in this role and while visiting students in schools.

    DavidBarber
    LindaCooper
    GrahamMeeson

    Introduction

    This book is intended for trainee and newly qualified teachers. It explores issues surrounding the installation, operation and application of interactive whiteboards in the primary and early years classroom. Throughout this book the technology will be referred to by the abbreviation IWB. This is a common abbreviation, although you may encounter the alternative, IAW, in other contexts.

    The authors of this book are all involved in teacher training and hope that you will find considerable food for thought in the following chapters. We have tried to make the book as practical as possible and it contains numerous classroom stories detailing real-life experiences of teachers and trainees. You will not find many ready-made resources, but there are references to numerous sources where these can be obtained. The main priority has been to equip you with the essential skills required to use an IWB confidently and for the effective creation and evaluation of engaging teaching materials.

    Readers will find that two main IWB products are given particular attention. These are the Promethean ACTIVboard™ and the SMART Board™ products. Sections that are of particular relevance to specific models are signalled in the text. However, it is recommended that you read the whole book as discussions of specific products can raise issues of general relevance. Also, to prevent unnecessary repetition, features that are offered by both IWBs may be described more completely for one product than in the description of another. In addition, you should not confine yourself to an understanding of a single product, as you will inevitably be called upon to use both, or others, at some point in your teaching.

  • References

    Becta (2003) What the Research Says about Interactive Whiteboards. Coventry: British Communications and Technology Agency.
    Becta (undated) How to Use Webcams Safely in Schools. Available at: http://schools.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=is&catcode=ss_to_es_tl_uor_03&rid=9930(accessed 06.10.06).
    Buzan, T. (1991) The Mind Map Book. New York: Penguin.
    Carter, A. (2002) Using Interactive Whiteboards With Deaf Children. Birmingham Grid for Learning. Available from: http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/resources_ftp/client_ftp/teacher/ict/whiteboards/index.htm (accessed 08.04.06).
    Clark, S. and Cooper, S (2003) Showing, Telling, Sharing: Florida School for the Deaf and Blind. EDCompass Online Community for Education using Smart Products™;. Available from: http://education.smarttech.com/NR/rdonlyres/303DED40-9E94-4C05-9BA2-AED4404B1AF5/0/CustCaseStudyFloridaSchoolForTheDeafBlind.pdf (accessed 19.04.04).
    Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Eccleston, K. and Hall, E. (2004) Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post 16 Learning, a Systematic Review. Learning and Skills Research Centre. Available from http://www.Isda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf(accessed 14.10.04).
    Crapper, S. (2002) Developing Interactive Teaching. North Islington Education Action Zone. Available from: http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/iwb/Why_IWB_work_for_us.pdf(accessed 07.04.06).
    Cuthell, J.P. (2005) Seeing the Meaning. The impact of interactive whiteboards on teaching and learning. Proceedings of WCCE 05 Stellenbosch South Africa. Available from:http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/changemanage/iwb/Seeing%20the%20meaning.pdf (accessed 04.04.06).
    DfES (1999) The National Curriculum. Handbook for primary teachers in England. Key Stages 1 and 2. London: DfES Publications.
    DfES (2000) The National Mathematics Strategy. London: HMSO.
    DfES (2004) Excellence and Enjoyment: Learning and Teaching in the Primary Years. London: QCA Publications.
    Dunn, K., Dunn, R. and Price, G.E (1975–1997) Learning Styles Inventory. Lawrence: Price Systems.
    Gardner, H. (1999) Intelligences Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
    Graham (2003) Switching on Switched Off Children. Shrewsbury: St Giles CE Primary School. Available from: http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/2003research/Switching_Switched_Off.doc (accessed 07.04.06).
    Goodison, T. (2002) Learning with ICT at Primary Level: Pupils’ Perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 282–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00240.x
    Holt, M. (2005) Evaluating the Contribution of Activote within the Classroom. Available from: http://www.evaluation.icttestbed.org.uk/learning/research/primary/technology/interactive_voting_systems (accessed 15.09.06).
    Kress, G. (2000) ‘Multimodality’, in Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (eds) Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
    Latham, P. (2002) Teaching and Learning Primary Mathematics: The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards. North Islington Education Action Zone. Available from:http://www.beam.co.uk/pdfs/RES03.pdf(accessed 18.04.06).
    Lee, M. and Boyle, M. (2003) The Educational Effects and Implications of the Interactive Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School: A Brief Review. Richardson Primary School. Available from:http://www.richardsonps.act.edu.au/RichardsonReview_Grey.pdf (accessed 19.04.06).
    Levy, P. (2002) Interactive Whiteboards in Learning and Teaching in Two Sheffield Schools: A Developmental Study. Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield. Available from:http://www.dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm(accessed 03.04.06).
    Miller, D.J., Glover, D. and Averis, D. (2005) Developing Pedagogic Skills for the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Mathematics. Glamorgan: British Educational Research Association. Available from: http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/docs/IAWResearch.pdf(accessed 15.06.06).
    National Whiteboard Network (2004) Interactive Whiteboards. Available from: http://www.nwnet.org.uk./pages/rev_imp/teachers.html(accessed 08.04.06).
    North Islington Education Action Zone (2002) Why Interactive Whiteboards Work For Us. Available from: http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/Why_IWB_work_for_us.pdf (accessed 13.10.06).
    Potter, F. and Darbyshire, C. (2005) Understanding and Teaching the ICT National Curriculum. London: David Fulton.
    QCA (1998) Curriculum Guidance for Key Stage 1 and 2: Design Technology. London: QCA Publications.
    Sharp, J.G., Byrne, J. and Bowker, R. (2006) VAK or VAK-uous? Lessons in the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship. Paper presented at the British Education Studies Association Second Annual Conference, Bishop Grosseteste College, Lincoln, 30 June–1 July.
    SMART™ Technologies (2006) Using Microsoft Office Applications with SMART™ Board software. Available from: http://smarttech.com/media/services/quickreferences/pdf/english/InkAwareQR.pdf(accessed 03.01.07).
    Smith, A. and Call, N. (2000) The ALPS Approach: Accelerated Learning in Primary Schools. Stafford: Network Educational Press Ltd.
    Smith, H (2001) SmartBoard™ Evaluation: Final Report. Maidstone: Kent NGFL. Available from: http://www.kented.org.uk/ngfl/ict/IWB/whiteboards/report.html#top (accessed 04.04.06).
    Sternberg, R.J. and Grigorenko, E.L. (2001) ‘A Capsule History of Theory and Research on Styles’, in R.J.Sternberg and L.F.Zhang (eds).
    Sternberg, R.J. and Zhang, L.F. (eds) (2001) Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles. Mahwah, N.J.: LEA.
    Warren, C. (undated) Interactive Whiteboards: An Approach to Effective Methodology. Available from: http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/iwb/index.html(accessed 07.04.06).

    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website