Is the Personal beyond Private and Public?: New Perspectives in Social Theory and Practice

Books

Arnab Chatterjee

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Copyright

    Preface

    SAGE was founded in 1965 by Sara Miller McCune to support the dissemination of usable knowledge by publishing innovative and high-quality research and teaching content. Today, we publish over 900 journals, including those of more than 400 learned societies, more than 800 new books per year, and a growing range of library products including archives, data, case studies, reports, and video. SAGE remains majority-owned by our founder, and after Sara's lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures our continued independence.

    Los Angeles | London | New Delhi | Singapore | Washington DC | Melbourne

    Advance Praise

    In this book, Arnab Chatterjee attempts the difficult task of describing the place of the personal in the public/private divide that is supposed to form the basis of modern institutions in Indian society. His methods are both phenomenological and historical. Of particular interest is his treatment of the little-known works of Indian Hegelians such as Brajendranath Seal and Hiralal Haldar. This book promises to draw the attention of scholars of everyday practices in modern Indian life.

    Partha Chatterjee, Professor of Anthropology Columbia University

    The book is very engaging.

    Dipesh Chakrabarty, Lawrence A. Kimpton Distinguished Service Professor of History, The University of Chicago

    This book crosses the boundaries of philosophy and social theory in very interesting ways and is a great contribution to the development of the ideas of discourse, criticism, and subjectivity.

    Veena Das, Krieger-Eisenhower Professor of Anthropology, Johns Hopkins University

    Acknowledgements

    To my (late) ma, mejdi, bacchiya, Chotu Singh, and lately, Anuradha

    Those who deeply mourned my slowness and the non-being of this work—over a long time; now, finally…

    Preface

    Bulk Sales

    SAGE India offers special discounts for purchase of books in bulk.

    We also make available special imprints and excerpts from our books on demand.

    For orders and enquiries, write to us at

    Marketing Department

    SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd

    B1/I-1, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area

    Mathura Road, Post Bag 7

    New Delhi 110044, India

    E-mail us at marketing@sagepub.in

    Get to know more about SAGE

    Be invited to SAGE events, get on our mailing list. Write today to marketing@sagepub.in

    This book is also available as an e-book.

    Prologue

    I

    Unlike Lyotard who wanted to “stroke his [Marx's] beard as a complex libidinal volume, reawakening his hidden desire and ours along with it,”1 we must be serious enough and consider that when such an energetic and forceful theorist as Marx wrote “the [modern] state is founded upon the contradiction between public and private life,”2 it rehearsed in one breath as if the taxonomic key to understanding modernity—which is the public/private divide; and notwithstanding Marx's own resolution (i.e., the abolition of private property), a corresponding failure (of thinkers including Marx) to find a way beyond the conflictual binary of the public and private, could be said to have been, pace Marx's own words, momentously, unboxed. Marx's agenda and resolution are well-known, but while Marx had an effective concern with smashing the liberal divide, there is a long list of other thinkers who have grappled—being imbibed with an unputdownable “interpretive” interest—with the problem of finding a way beyond the binary. For the great, canonical thinkers of the public sphere, Hannah Arendt had previously rejected intimacy as a “deep private;” for Habermas, it reappeared as the beyond of private and public. The personal remains manifestly and immanently under-theorized in the works of both the thinkers, and this book steps in with caution to fill this gap. Recent researches—while tracing “the ongoing struggle [since two hundred years ago] in Locke, Shafetusbury, Hutcheson, Hume, and Smith to find a framework to mediate between the public and private,”—in order to grasp our own times, switch over to—“Levinas's belief that a certain mediation between the public and private is possible and in Derrida's insistence that a discourse predicated on a clear and absolute distinction between the public and the private can only fall into ruins.”3 Now, what is the register of this crucial, mediating mark? These researches—of which Gaston's book is the most competent and poignant example—advocate (albeit erroneously) the “secret”4 in Derrida's (and Levinas's) works to have been the tempting solution. Death (“language about death is nothing but the long history of a secret society, neither public nor private, semi-private, semi-public, on the border between the two”), the postcard (“half-private half-public neither the one nor the other”), and the telephone are Derrida's three examples of the secret meant to solve the liberal dichotomy.

    All this is to make a single point: those thinkers who have been pivotal in finding (Western) modernity and continue to engage with its gestures through their breathing apostles, and also those who were prophets of colonial (and now postcolonial) modernities, could be seen to have been— though not always in an informed manner—struggling to solve the public/ private riddle with an answer of their own. This has been the story since 1767, and it runs amok till 2017. The public/private riddle is one of the strongest unsolved puzzles in the history of ideas. Strongest all the more because the dissenting strands always ran up to alternative versions or weak synonyms of either the private or the public (a classical example is the personal that appeared/and still appears as another version of the private being used as a moment of parole, that is, speech particularly in everyday life and language). The mix-up between the private and the personal has been naturalized to the extent that their doubtful assonance within texts and discourses go un-problematically, and dangerously, unheeded. Are the personal and the private the same and thus interchangeable? If not, in what ways could they be said to have been different? When did this confusion set in? Now, if it is possible to distance and distinguish them, then what are the results of such a revision? In this work, these issues will be broached to argue in favor of a trichotomy (personal, public, and private) to consequently arrive at a point beyond the debated dichotomy (where the personal and the private serve as a single algorithm and that has been conveniently pitted against the public).

    This work, in an attempt to grapple with this dilemma in a new way, if not to resolve it altogether, argues the personal as a beyond of the private/public binary and distinguishes it from the private vis-à-vis the public. The private is opposed to the public and resists public scrutiny and publicity—the stuff of which the public is made. The way we do not know what a person is, what his/her real/final intentions are, or whether somebody is genuinely aggrieved or not—makes the personal largely unpredictable and indeterminate in the final instance, and not necessarily opposed to the public. Originally being legal-juridical categories, private and public have specific indicators. Personal relationships such as love or friendship remain outside legislation.

    For the second moot point in this work, I shall show, schematically though how the journey—at least in colonial modernity, and its aftermath— has not been from personality to impersonality, as has often been assumed, but from the realm of the natural personal to that of the juridical/group/ collective personality of organizations. This will be pursued specifically in Part 2 of the work: the inviting emptiness of legal fictions—plausible even in the wake of contemporary, originary capitalism, as Rose states, “The concept of capital brings the relation of person and thing to the crunch. Capital acts like a person [and] not a thing. The illusion of natural personality is destroyed by this personification.”5 This could be provocative for many, particularly for the specialists dedicated to postcolonial theory, but, given the volume and span of the present work, I could not assuage their hunger by delving into the burgeoning literature of legal personality and legal fictions—more than that was minimally required—excluding even the exciting oeuvre that engages with neo-Kantian jurisprudence, particularly Emile Lask, Radbruch, Stammler, and Dabin.6 But while this is trapped by and in law, the root metaphors of love and friendship-(stated before), again when instituted, escape the law as event. Finally, I intend to show that all the helping structures including the welfare state and social work—which raided by the whimsical and arbitrary metaphors of “personal” relational filiations, admittedly, with or against their own intended grain—cannot be grasped by the public/private motors.

    II

    Personalism (which posits that the person is of the supreme value) forms the primary theoretical fillip to this study. Classic treatises in this tradition tend to trace the lineage back to medievalism and then to the interlocution recovered from the philosophic tracts of Lotze, Fichte, Jacobi, Scheler, Feuerbach, etc. And then the neo-Hegelians turned the world of the God-based personalism upside down when Marx came with a warrant: God also became radical and worn. Putting aside the various versions of personalism, I have tended to rely on the German version (against the view that “the American school [only] … is perceived by scholars to define personalism”7); here the person is irreducible—which I think relies on and, in turn, refers to the essence of personalism. An initial note of caution here (since there is a huge literature in analytical philosophy on personal identity): this work is not inspired by nor does it intend to contribute to the debate on “who is a person” or “what is personal identity” as such, though tangentially these notions do crop up as flowers by the wayside,8 but only as much as or as many times as they are relevant to the concept-metaphor “personal” as against that of the private vis-à-vis the public. If we are to go by the definition of persons as rational beings with rights (as the legal definition purportedly goes) or of intrinsic worth and dignity “not equaled by nonpersons”9 (as goes in moral theory, too), we are in for further dismay, since the nonpersons being the self-servicing, categorical constructions of the persons themselves is out-and-out discriminatory, solipsistic, and ideological (recall the nonperson status of women, children, and slaves to understand this detestable historical logos); they were (or are) nonpersons as they have been deprived of the rights that could be accrued to them when rightfully considered. Though the general, running paradigms of all schools of personalism, regardless of their origins, believe in the “personal reason and impersonal understanding,” the “personal absolute,” and the “personal unity in diversity,”10 all are treated in this work with a defamiliarizing effect, and thereby, the orthodox personalists will find their categories being addressed after all. It is to this German tradition, where what goes by the name of personalism in a phenomenological mode, that my debt is the most; Max Scheler (a dark disciple of Husserl, and whom the latter distinctly disliked) should be named as an inspiring instance here. While personalism informs this work, in the tradition of Hegel and Alasdair Maclntyre—as they practiced it—the methodological approach to be borne by this work can be called philosophical history (when the proposal was first mooted), that is, a history of concepts, ideas, and so on. After many years, in hindsight, I still find the recommendation useful. A philosophical history is necessary to interrupt the self-complicity of concepts, which would have paraded—if it were only a philosophical study—as atemporal and uniquely essential. Therefore, philosophical history, simply put, is generated when we tend to philosophize history and historicize philosophy. Hegel thinks that these binaries (history and philosophy) are sometimes “necessary dichotomies” and “one factor in life,”11 necessary because “life eternally forms itself by setting up opposition[s].” 12 But he perceives that when the might of unity “vanishes from the life of men and the antitheses lose their living connection and reciprocity and gain independence, the need of philosophy arises.”13 This gaining of independence is important: as if history and philosophy become two independent autonomous sectors of a single thought. And we must also mark the moment that it is in modernity that such oppositions take an objective form: faith versus knowledge, objectivity versus subjectivity, rational versus speculative, critical versus dogmatic, and lastly history versus philosophy. Reason unites what intellect has divided—history and philosophy. The task of reason is the task of philosophy.

    Similarly, the person and the personal are not reducible to history and philosophy, too! But while transcendental phenomenology teaches us the irreducibility of the person to an act or agency (I extend it in this study to mean that the person is irreducible to the private or the public), it rarely engages with other discourses to see the consequences this view entails. The theological gloss often attributed to personalism derives, I guess, from this not-so-unclear apathy. This is abandoned in the present study to engage in a pluridisciplinary feat. This work is at the cusp of social and political philosophy, welfare sociology, social work, moral and legal theory, and philosophical history—and that too in the continental tradition. Not that the analytic tradition—as I have hinted at before— cannot offer intriguing thought forms or insights into the personal and personal identity and others, but there is a hunch that it can rarely explicate, self-reflexively, its own politics and bring back in politics, history, law, or literature in the style of cultural formations in which they occur in terribly mixed moorings, in the practice of everyday life.14 This dawned on Husserl, who brooked the life-world, and Heidegger, who pushed it to extremes. Consider, for instance, when Derek Parfit concludes, “our reasons for acting should become more impersonal…it would often be better for everyone,”15 he chooses to be unaware (in fact, he could very well be) of the very fact that this is a political proposition, and public, political modernity appeared with such an axiom to be maintained and administered for its rational regime of technology; but the immanent reality of it, as I unravel it, could be examined for its truth in Chapter 1.16 But this investment does not come from nowhere. “It results as well from a kind of double censorship which the philosophy of language exercises as it sets the stage for thinking about language: Anglo-American philosophy of language not only censors the personal, it also obliterates all signs of this censorship.”17 It was incumbent upon us to restore the personal when it is seen to have been silenced in the classical continental tradition; at least, that is the complaint of Nietzsche—the first philosopher of the personal.18

    III

    Then, the present task—the task at hand—in all its homelessness in the present work, expands along the following registers and could be delineated as follows in an attempt to describe the thematic matrix of the chapters.

    Chapter 1 theoretically narrates how modernity arrives with a burgeoning impersonality and a formal rationality spread to life-spheres. A separation of the private and the public and the constraints of formal law are idealized. But the person with his/her “politics of dirty hands” overwhelms this disjunction and projects a peculiar crisis. In response, “personal attacks,” with their Greek origins and reaching their heights in 18th century political pornography, are such iconic examples, pointing out at the underbelly of objective events, ethics, and their symbolic dressing. The first signs of the person standing apart and standing out of the judicious separation of the public and the private, then, spillover. The person is the one, then, who can manipulate the private and the public.

    Now, if Chapter 1 delineated how the person is capable of deceiving and escaping the limits set out by both the private and the public realms, the call for integrating them have been enormous and stifling, (as if) the public preacher and the private practitioner have to be reconciled in the same person and at some level of virtue! But how is it possible to integrate the private and the public at the site of an “echo” without dissolving the differences on which they are found? Taking cue from a neglected exchange between Mahatma Gandhi and Motilal Nehru, Chapter 2 brings out the dilemmas inherent in such an experiment and opens up the personal to its own prehistory. The monarch and the dictator unite the private and the public in the same, sovereign person. This chapter prefaces the prehistory of the person and the personal.

    Having made in Chapter 2 a short detour into charting the pre-history of the personal in telegraphic terms—from the monarch to the dictator— we took Gandhi's desire as drive. In Chapter 3, we delve deeper into this prehistory—which because of its unavailability has to be reconstructed from disparate and disseminated sources and is bound to be episodic, while subsequently being the inscription of cultural history—which, as will be evident, could be reconstructed willfully in its sutured adequation.

    After hinting at a historical and a subsequent cultural historical reconstruction of the personal in Chapter 3, it was necessary to examine if the distinction could be sustained theoretically as well. In Chapter 4, we pursue it in a short and sharp—albeit simple—manner. In concurrence with the definitive part of our book, this chapter tends to deploy the personal as recovered in history and tested in theory where the personal seems to have been problematized—matching the impersonal essence of modernity—and ought to have been expelled from the public sphere.

    Chapter 5 shows how the indeterminate, whimsical personal subverts all rationally determinate welfare schemes in modern civil society, and how, against its well-honed intentions, it is a journey from personality to personality. The chapter charts how the affirmation of ordinary life generated a secular ethic of social virtue. Through this, helping (among other actions) and a helping canon (social work) was to be emancipated from the personal character of an individual and his/her idiosyncratic virtues of whimsical giving. The chapter documents how Hegel— appreciating the universal aspects of poverty—had proposed the mediating institutions of civil society to order this transition. The fate of such a hunt for the universal in 19th century Bengal is examined through the texts of a Bengali neo-Hegelian, Brajendranath Seal. Part 2 (on Hiralal Haldar) of this chapter takes cue from the preceding part and expands on the journey of our modernity from natural personality to the personality of organizations. To graph this journey is fairly straight: we've deployed the personal in mirroring how the Western universal forms of impersonal civil-social helping has been smeared with the whimsical and arbitrary forms of personalistic polemic, finally, coalescing in the personality of organizations or group personalities—evident even in postcolonial India.

    The last chapter (6) tries to weigh the analytical use the category personal could have in laying bare the similarities and differences between various informal helping modalities and social work—the disciplinary helping canon. The perusal—selectively—has been dispersed along the essential registers of etymology and genealogy.

    IV

    The impact of this study may be conjectured along the following lines. Apart from re-invoking a long-lost philosophical history, the substantive content of this work—if persuasive enough—will correct and contribute to a long overdue lack in social theory and social philosophy, which—being trapped and allegedly engaged in the act of sacrificing either the private to the public or the public to the private (i.e., either domesticate the public or submit the private to public scrutiny)—went on, in an act of mourning, as if to discover alternative privacies or proletarian counter publics. The personal emerges in this book, as a distinct first, neither incorporated nor “assimilable” in either the private or the public.

    As it is evident, this might entail—in future—via the domestication through research of those forgotten comportments (those institutions, people and their work as social texts) a large-scale theoretical revision of the present history of modernity, philosophy of helping, and the ethics of care; it would be interesting to watch how disciplinary social sexual and legal-ethical care try to thematize this disturbance through the narrative management of historical differences.

    Notes

    1 Jean-Francois Lyotard, “The Desire Named Marx” in Libidinal Economy, transi. I. H. Grant (1994; repr., London: Continuum, 2005), 94-150.

    2 Karl Marx, Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy, eds. T. B. Bottomore and M. Rubel (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1961), 222.

    3 Sean Gaston, Derrida and Disinterest (London: Continuum, 2005), vii-viii.

    4 How a “secret” as the “deep private” fails in its mediation has been discussed in Chapters 3 and 4.

    5 Gillian Rose, Dialectic of Nihilism: Post-structuralism and Law (England: Basil Blackwell. 1984), 46.

    6 Rose's book is perhaps the only classic on this (in English) which is neither used nor cited extensively.

    7 Jan Olof Bengtsson, The Worldview of Personalism: Origin and Early Development (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006), 271.

    8 For example see the discussion on personal agency and identity contra Amartya Sen in Chapter 4.

    9 Bengston, The Worldview of Personalism, 31.

    10 Ibid., 272.

    11 G. W. F. Hegel, “The Difference Between Fichte ‘s and Schelling ‘s System of Philosophy: The Need of Philosophy” in The Hegel Reader, ed. Stephen Houlgate (Blackwell Publishers: UK, 1998), 40-43.

    12 Ibid.

    13 Ibid.

    14 In endorsement, consider the following from Habermas:

    Since analytic philosophy of language more or less confines itself to issues it has inherited from the epistemological tradition, it lacks a certain sensibility for as well as the tools for dealing with the looser and larger issues of a diagnostics of an era. Since Hegel, the philosophical discourse of modernity has, therefore, been the domain of so-called continental philosophy. In this regard, the opposition between analytic and continental currents, which has otherwise become obsolete, still somewhat makes sense.

    See Jürgen Habermas, Truth and Justification, ed. and trans. Barbara Fultner (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003), 79.

    15 Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 442.

    16 So far as Parfit's augmentation of a “rational altruism” [we should “give no priority to our own children, this would be better for all our children” (Ibid., 444)] is considered, my discussion of altruism in Chapter 6 critiquing Nagel and others could be considered a beginning. I pick up the analytic tradition on the person in a separate study.

    17 Hagi Kenaan, The Present Personal: Philosophy and the Hidden Face of Language (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2005), 6.

    18 See Chapter 4 for more on Nietzsche as the first philosopher of the personal.

    Acknowledgments

    This book is not “an accident of chapters” as some would like to fashion the print-orientation that is inscribed here; this goes back to an investment of a decade and more than six years of labored, active imagination.

    In fact, throughout these years, an array of publications and seminars sustained my interest in the work and even authenticated its place among the learned (the “warm fraternity of useless erudition”)—where a paradigm is performed co-constitutively. For instance, the thesis of this book (which was sent as a paper to Sandra Harding and she was kind enough to confirm it in a letter on February 23, 2005) was first published in the year 2006 in the Indian Journal of Social Work as an article. It is indexed—as a student working on it informed me—with the US Library of Congress; London School of Economics (Sarah Hayward, Library Assistant, LSE Library, was kind enough to correspond with me on this [beginning May 8, 2016]), Sociological Abstracts, Inc. with International Sociological Association, US; Social Science Citation Index with the Institute for Scientific Information, USA; etc. I gratefully remember the gesture of scholars such as Professor Sharmila Rege who made the article a reference reading material in the Women's Studies Center at the University of Pune in 2007; I mourn her untimely demise.

    I will cite the reason for rememorating all these with the help of an apparent, and immediate, hypothetical imperative. In the Prologue, I had deployed Paul Halmos who proposed a transition from pastoral social work (comprising pre-social work forms of helping) to professional social work (scientific, institutionalized disciplinary and paid form of helping). My spin on it will be available in Chapter 6 and also in others. What, however, is ridiculous—even scandalous—is to have someone who claims to have been “proposing” a pre-social work indigenous form (whose translation is even erroneous with him) as pastoral. In terms of an episodic and periodic history, too (Chapter 5 here, in longer version) while holding onto a few neo-Hegelian 19th century philosophers of colonial Bengal, I arrived at the distinction that marks and remarks [on] modern and pre-modern helping forms, and learnt how the personal not only invades the impersonal-rational universal modern motors of helping but contaminates and nearly destroys them (referred to in Chatterjee 2008 and published differently in 2010). I have not moved an inch away from that observation. Therefore, if any activist-scholar of the nationalist phase of a helping form bribes him/herself with the new found relata of modernity and in trying to forge an unacknowledged but inspired, labored linkage fails to match his/her otherwise empirical stuff, few would empathize. So keenly I remember (my wife's favorite) Thoreau here:

    Shall I not have words as fresh as my thoughts? Shall I use any other man's word? A genuine thought or feeling can find expression for itself, if it have to invent hieroglyphics. It has the universe for type-metal. It is for want of original thought that one man's style is like another's.

    Grateful thanks to Ms Nandita Bhattacharya, Professor Gautam Gupta, Professor Nilanjana Gupta, Professor Sadhan Chakraborti, Professor Soumitra Basu, Professor Gautam Bhadra, and the Governor of West Bengal, Shri Kesari Nath Tripathi.

    My tryst at the Indian Institute of Advanced Study (HAS), Shimla, during 2013-15 will always remain memorable—with Professor D. N. Dhanagare, Professor Radhaballav Tripathi, Professor Udayan Mishra, Sri Rajesh Joshi, Professor Kunal Chakraborty, Shri Sumanta Banerjee—a constellation of academic and creative stalwarts. Professor Chetan Singh, the Director, and Mr Premchand, Secretary and Librarian, are the best of peoples I have ever met. Moidul Islam, Rahul Govind, Amitranjan Basu, and Enakshi Mitra were excellent academic partners and interlocutors. Dr Moidul Islam—especially—combines in him the highest standards of academic excellence, competence with a down to earth, helpful generosity and intellectual honesty that is seemingly without a parallel.

    Professor Nasrin Siddiqui of Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration (YASHADA), Pune (in 2008), Shuddhabrata, Jeebesh, Monica, Sadan Jha, and Vivek Narayanan (in 2007)—the poet—besides Professor Pratiksha Baxi, Professor Lawrence Liang, and V. Sanal Mohan who remain as the Delhi-based authors whom I admire, acknowledge, and keenly follow.

    At the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta (CSSSC) in Kolkata, my past, elective affinities with Shri Prabir Basu (whose non-administrative poetics—he being a great translator of Jibanananda Das) relieves and robs me of any nightmares; Professor Partha Chatterjee, Professor Pradip Bose, Professor Tapati Guhathakurta, and Professor Rosinka Chaudhury contributed to my work with longstanding empathy, at times deliberate pity due to the prolong, era-taking attitude of mine (in response, my shy answer was always Walter Benjamin: “under the shadow of Saturn, I'm slow.”)

    Dr Debarshi Sen—a perfect academic administrator at IIAS first and then at CSSSC, Kolkata—sets a standard too high for any bureaucrat, but is an absolute well-wisher. Only Sandip Chatterjee, the ex-registrar of TISS and JNU, gloriously matches the level set by Prabir Basu and Debarshi Sen and is with force an honorable exception.

    Dr Palash Mandai, Professor Arya Ghosh, Arunangsu Guhathakurta, Mohid Hyder, Sanjib Ganguly, and Ranjan Banerjee bear the remnants of the Deoghar and the Santiniketan gang. Professor Rajsekhar Basu, Professor Sanjeeb Mukherjee, Professor Someswar Bhowmik, Dr Abhijit Roy, and Shri Bibhas Bagchi are all stars of the Kolkata academia. Subodh Sarkar, Roro Sarkar are superstars. I owe each of them a mental nail. Professor Manas Roy, Professor Dipankar Gupta, Professor Mahendra Pal Singh, Professor Surinder Singh Jodhka, Professor Abha Chauhan, Professor Aditya Nigam, and Professor Rajeev Bhargava, with their distant presence, do not always know that they epistemically excite me and I have an inheritance of gain. The same goes for Soumyabrata Choudhury and Prasenjit Biswas—two continental stars, besides our own Aniruddha Choudhury and Rahul Govind—in the Indian and international philosophical space.

    Also, the late Niranjan Chatterjee, Atonu Chatterjee (who introduced me to the Subaltern Studies when I was in higher secondary), Manisha Chatterjee, Paramita Chatterjee, Tathagata (Nanda) Ray, Sushmita (Minti) Chatterjee, Sujit and Srirup Kanjilal—as my immediate and extended family—suspect that even in social intercourse, I'm engaged in “fake encounters,” but the kinship—they know—is too real, even if materially absent at times.

    My wife, Anuradha Chatterjee, came from nearly nowhere in 2016 and has defamiliarized my life to the extent it is not recognizably the same anymore. Having worked on Emerson and Thoreau and American neo-transcendentalism, she is equally eloquent about poets who were auto-destructive and often killed themselves. That is a (mis)match with her conservatist orthodoxy and hides the immense duties she caps and carries on her lean shoulders.

    Finally, the book is dedicated to my mother Dipali Chatterjee (among other fellow tragedians) who even months before her death on October 30, 2006 was scared about my tryst with obscure and sometimes scandalous thinkers and writers and urged me to come to terms with acceptable academia in Kolkata and India. She wished me to put to rest my habit of “polemicizing,” which has earned me a team of fierce and active “well-wishers.” Her unforgettable concern will always remain higher than my unforgivable stubbornness. Higher all the more because she, apart from Guddie, would have been the happiest to know that my work has had such a large and informed audience that goes with the prestige and stardom of SAGE.

    And I must confess now, “particularly” before you “actually” read the book, that my fiancé and companion Chotu-Chotu Singh—whom some erroneously call a parakeet—dug her heels and nails in every letter and ate some of them too. It is Chotu who screamed in her shrill voice once, “You can read nothing except through appetite” and thereby obliged me to be in a frozen standstill. And I'm still standing there, here and nowhere, only to later find Chotu sitting on my shoulder, wings bare.

    Grateful thanks to all!

  • Bibliography

    William Adam. A Lecture on the Life and Labours of Rammohun Roy. Edited by Haldar Rakhal Das. Calcutta: Sadharan Brahmo Samaj, 1977. First published in 1879.
    Theodor Adorno. “A Portrait of Walter Benjamin.” In Prisms, translated by Samuel and Shierry Weber, 227-41. London: Neville Spearman, 1967.
    Theodor Adorno. “Letter to Walter Benjamin.” In Aesthetics and Politics, edited by Bloch Ernst, Lukacs Georg, Brecht Bertolt, Benjamin Walter, Adorno Theodor, 110-33. London: Verso, 1980.
    Theodor Adorno. “Anti-Semitism and Fascist Propaganda.” In The Stars Down to Earth and Other Essays on the Irrational in Culture, edited by Crook Stephen, 218-31. London: Routledge, 2002.
    Theodor Adorno. 1990. Negative Dialectics. Translated by Ashton E. B. London: Routledge, 1990.
    Theodor Adorno, and Horkheimer Max. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by J. Cumming. London: Verso, 1992.
    Giorgio Agamben. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Roazen D. H. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.
    Agnew Elizabeth N. From Charity to Social Work: Mary E. Richmond and the Creation of an American Profession. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004.
    Aziz Al-Azmeh, ed. Islamic Law: Social and Historical Contexts. London: Routledge, 1988.
    Ali Amir, 2001. “Evolution of Public Sphere in India.Economic and Political Weekly 36, no. 26 (2001): 2419-25.
    Ambedkar B. R.Caste and Class.” In The Essential Writings of B. R. Ambedkar edited by V. Rodrigues, 99-105. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    Ambedkar B. R.Reply to the Mahatma.” In The Essential Writings of B. R. Ambedkar, 306-19. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    Louis Althusser. Machiavelli and Us. Translated by Gregory Eliott. London: Verso, 1999.
    Applbaum, Arthur Isak. Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
    Aristotle. The Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    Aristotle.Politics.” In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon Richard, 1114-316. New York, NY: The Modern Library, 2001.
    Aristotle.Rhetorica.” In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon Richard, 1325-451. New York, NY: The Modern Library, 2001.
    Aiyar, P. Ramanath. P. Ramanatha Aiyar ‘s Concise Law Dictionary. New Delhi, Wadhwa Company: 2004.
    Bachelard Gaston. “The Dialectics of Outside and Inside.” In The Continental Aesthetics Reader, edited by Cazeaux Clive, 151-63. London: Routledge, 2000.
    Bandyopadhyaya Asit Kumar. Bangla Sahityer Ittivritta, Vol. IV [Bengali]. Calcutta: Modern Book Agency Pvt. Ltd, 1973.
    Haricharan Bandopadhyaya. Bangiya Sabdakosh, Vol. II [Bengali]. Kolkata: Sahitya Academy, 1966.
    Sibaji Bandyopadhyay. “East” Meeting “West”: A Note on Colonial Chronotopicity. Calcutta: Jadavpur University, 1994.
    Barker Ernest. ‘Introduction.’ In Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500-1800by Otto Gierke, edited and translated by Ernest Barker, ix-lxxxviii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
    Barker Ernest Political Thought in England 1848—1914. London: Oxford University Press, 1951.
    Jonathan Barnes. Early Greek Philosophy. England: Penguin Books, 2001.
    Basu Pradip. ed. Samayiki, puruno samoyik patrer prabandha samkalan, Vol. 1 [Bengali], 1856-1901. Calcutta: Ananda Publishers, 1998.
    Beckerlegge Gwilym. “Swami Vivekananda and Seva: Taking Social Service Seriously.” In Swami Vivekananda and the Modernisation of Hinduism, edited by William Radice, 45-58. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Bengtsson Jan Olof. The Worldview of Personalism: Origin and Early Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.
    Seyla Benhabib, and Dallmayr Fred, eds. The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990.
    Benjamin Walter. “Outline of the Psychophysical Problem.” In Selected Writings: Vol 1, 1913-26, edited by M. Bullock and M. W. Jennings, 393-401. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
    Benjamin WalterOedipus, or Rational Myth.” In Selected Writings, Vol. 2, Part 2, 1931-34, edited and translated by R. Livingstone et al., and edited by M. W. Jennings and H. Eiland et al. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 2005.
    Jeremy Bentham. Bentham ‘s Theory of Fictions. Edited by Ogden C. K. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd, 1932.
    Emile Benveniste. Indo-European Language and Society. Translated by Elizabeth Palmer. London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1973.
    Marshall Berman. The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1970.
    Beistegui Miguel de. Heidegger & the Political. London: Routledge, 1998.
    Bellamy Richard. 2010. “Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics.European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 412-30.
    BellHouse Mary L. 1997. “Erotic ‘Remedy’ Prints and the Fall of the Aristocracy in Eighteenth Century France.Political Theory 25, no. 5 (1997): 680-715.
    Berger Ann. “The Popularity of Language: Rousseau and the Mother Tongue.” In The Politics of Deconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Other of Philosophy, edited by Martin McQuillan, 98-115. London: Pluto Press, 2007.
    Andre Beteille. Equality and Universality: Essays in Social and Political Theory. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    Homi Bhabha. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 2009. First published in 1994.
    Gautam Bhadra. Jal Rajar Katha: Bardhamaner Pratapchand [Bengali]. Kolkata: Ananda Publishers, 2002.
    Bhargava Rajeev. “The Ethical Insufficiency of Egoism and Altruism: India in Transition.” In Indian Democracy: Meanings and Practices, edited by Rajinder Vora and Suhas Palshkar, 215-32. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2004.
    Rammohan Samiksha [Bengali] edited by D. K. Biswas. Kolkata: Saraswat Library. 1983.
    Black A. “The Individual and Society.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, edited by J. H. Burns, 588-606. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    Blunt Sir Edward, ed. Social Service in India: An Introduction to Some Social and Economic Problems of the Indian People. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1939.
    Bratsis Peter. “The Construction of Corruption, or Rules of Separation and Illusions of Purity in Bourgeois Societies.Social Text 77, 21, no. 4 (2003): 9-33.
    Briggs Asa. “The Welfare State in Historical Perspective.” In The Welfare State: A Reader, edited by Christopher Pierson and Francis G. Castles, 18-31. Cambridge: Polity Press & Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
    Brüggemeier Gert, Ciacchi Aurelia Colombi, and O'Callaghan Patrick, eds. Personality Rights in European Tort Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
    Burnham Douglas. “Heidegger, Kant and ‘Dirty’ Politics.European Journal of Political Theory 6, no. 1 (2007): 67-86.
    Butler Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York, NY: Routledge, 1997.
    Calhoun Craig. 1997. “Plurality, Promises, and Public Spaces.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGrowan, 232-59. Minneapolis, MN, and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
    Calhoun Craig, and McGrowan John, eds. Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics. Minneapolis, MN, and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
    Calhoun Laurie. “The Problem of'Dirty Hands’ and Corrupt Leadership.The Independent Review 8, no. 3 (2004): 363-85.
    Caplan Lionel. “Gifting and Receiving.” In Tradition, Pluralism and Identity: In Honour of T N. Madan, edited by Veena Das, Dipankar Gupta, and Patricia Uberoi, 283-305. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 1999.
    David Carr. Phenomenology and the Problem of History: A Study of Husserl ‘s Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1974.
    Dipesh Chakraborty. Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004.
    Dipesh Chakraborty. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
    Chatterjee Anuradha. “Thoreau's Waiden in Our Times in the Light of Transcendentalism.Unpublished PhD Dissertation. 2017.
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) Arnab. 2005. “Private/Public Dwander Baire: Personal/ Byaktigoto Niye Notun Kichoo” [Bengali]. Ababhas 5, no. 3 (2005): 91-108.
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) ArnabBeyond Private and Public: New Perspectives on Personal and Personalist Social Work.The Indian Journal of Social Work 67, no.3 (2006): 215-31.
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) Arnab Review article on Derrida. Political Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2007).
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) ArnabObjective Helping, Hegel and Three Indian reformers in the Colonial Civil Society: Prefacing the Personalytical History of Social Work.The Indian Journal of Social Work 71, no. 2 (2010a): 145-66.
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) Arnab 2010b. “Is person/al the terrorized unity of private and public? Rethinking Gandhi, Integrationism & the Politics of Pure Means.” Sociological Bulletin: Journal of the Indian Sociological Society 59, no. 3 (2010b): 407-22.
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) Arnab. “Corporate Social Work or ‘Being’ Empowered and ‘Doing’ Empowerment: Preface to a Discourse Ethical Monitoring of the Capability Approach.Journal of Human Values 17, no. 2 (2011): 161-70.
    Chatterjee (Chattopadhyaya) Arnab Categorical Blue: Personalytic Ethic in Social Work and Other Structures of Helping. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study (HAS), 2017.
    Chatterjee Basudev ed. Towards Freedom: Documents on the Movement for Independence in India, 1938, Part III, 2417. New Delhi: Indian Council for Historical Research and Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Chatterjee Partim. 1986. “The Moment of Manoeuvre: Gandhi and the Critique of Civil Society.” In Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? 54-130. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1986.
    Chatterjee PartimCommunities and the Nation.” In The Nation and Its Fragments. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994.
    Chatterjee PartimDemocracy and the Violence of the State: A Political Negotiation of Death.Paper circulated for CSSS Cultural Studies Workshop at Bharatpur, Rajasthan, 1999.
    Chatterjee Partim Review of Tika Tippani by Bhattacharya Pradyumna. Baromas 20, no. 1 (2000): 175-77.
    Chatterjee PartimOn Civil and Political Society in Post Colonial Democracies.” In Civil Society: History and Possibilities, edited by Kaviraj Sudipta and Khilnani Sunil, 165-78. Cambridge University Press, New Delhi: Foundation Books, 2002 (2001).
    Chatterjee PartimIntroduction: History in the Vernacular.” In History in the Vernacular, edited by Aquil Raziuddin and Chatterjee Partim, 1-24. New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2008.
    Chattopadhyay (Chatterjee) Bankimchandra. Review of Hindudharmer Sreshthata by Basu [Bengali] Rajnarayan. Bankim Rachanabali Vol. II, 6th ed. Calcutta: Sahitya Samsad, 1977.
    Chattopadhyay (Chatterjee) Bankimchandra. Dharmatattva. Translated by Ray Apratim. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, (1888) 2003.
    Lorenzo Chiesa. Subjectivity and Otherness: Philosophical Reading of Lacan. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007.
    Cicero.Attack on an Enemy of Freedom (The Second Philippic Against Antony).” In Selected Works, 101-153, translated by Grant M. England: Penguin Books, 1981.
    Cicero.De Oratore” and “Orator.” In The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. 2nd Ed. edited by. Patricia Bizzell and Bruce Herzberg, pp. 283-343. New York: Bedford St. Martin's, 2001.
    Clarke C. L. and Asquith S. 1985. “The Person and Moral Agency.” In Social Work and Social Philosophy: A Guide for Practice, 6-22. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
    Coady C. A. J. 1993. “Politics and the Problem of Dirty Hands.” In A Companion to Ethics, edited by Peter Singer, 373-83. UK: Blackwell, 1993.
    Cohen Lawrence. 1999. “Holi in Banaras and the Mahaland of Modernity.”GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies 2, no. 4 (1999): 399-424.
    Frederick Copleston. A History of Philosophy, Vol. IX (Maine De Biran to Sartre). London: Search Press, 1975.
    Cornwell Benjamin. “The Protestant Sect Credit Machine: Social Capital and the Rise of Capitalism.Journal of Classical Sociology 7, no. 3 (2007): 26790.
    Crowell Steven Galt. “Who is the Political Actor? An Existential Phenomenological Approach.” In Phenomenology of the Political, edited by Thompson Kevin and Embree Lester 11-28. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
    Robert Darnton. The Forbidden Best-sellers of Pre-revolutionary France, New York, NY: Norton, 1995.
    Dasgupta Sugata ed. Towards a Philosophy of Social Work in India. New Delhi: Popular Book Services, 1967.
    Delon Michel ed. Encyclopedia of Enlightenment, Vol 1. Chicago, IL: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2001.
    De Man Paul. “Return to Philology.” In Resistance to Theory, edited by Godzich Wlad 21-26. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press, 1986.
    Jacques Derrida. Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1979.
    Jacques Derrida. The Gift of Death. Translated by Wills David. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
    Jacques Derrida.Des Tours de Babel.” In Psyche, Inventions of the Other, Vol. 1, edited by Kamuf Peggy and Rottenberg Elizabeth 191-225. California: Stanford University Press, 2007.
    Murli Desai. Ideologies and Social Work: Historical and Contemporary Analyses. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, 2002.
    Digester Peter. “Forgiveness and Politics: Dirty Hands and Imperfect Procedures.Political Theory 26, no. 5 (1998): 700-24.
    Douglas Mary. 1990. “Foreward.” In The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, translated by Halls W. D. vii-xviii. London: Routledge, 1990.
    Drabinski John. “The Possibility of an Ethical Politics: From Peace to Liturgy.Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no.4 (2000): 49-73.
    Duby Georges. 1990. “The Diffusion of Cultural Patterns in Feudal Society.” In French Studies in History, Vol. II, edited by Aymard Maurice and Mukhia Harbans. 214-22. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 1988.
    Dutta Bhabatosh. 2003. “Banglar Jagorone missonarir daan.” In Unish Sataker Bangalijiban O Sanskriti, edited by Basu Swapan and Choudhury Indrajit. Kolkata: Pustakbiponi, 2003.
    Terry Eagleton. Trouble with Strangers: A Study of Ethics. Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
    Norbert Elias. The Civilizing Process (The History of Manners). Translated by Jephcott E. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.
    Norbert Elias.Time and Timing.” In On Civilization, Power and Knowledge: Selected Writings, edited by Mennell S. and Goudsblom J. 253-59. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
    Elster Jon. “Introduction.” In The Multiple Self, edited by Elster Jon 1-34. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
    Evans Eric J., ed. Social Policy, 1830—1914: Individualism, Collectivism and the Origins of the Welfare State, 102-03. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.
    Farndale Nigel. 2002. “Geoffrey Boycott.In Flirtation Seduction Betrayal: Interviews with Heroes and Villains, 33-41. London: Constable & Robnson Ltd, 2002.
    Farris Sara R. Max Weber's Theory of Personality: Individuation, Politics and Orientalism in the Sociology of Religion. Brill: Leiden, 2013.
    Fischer Karl. “Karl Fischer's Review of The Protestant Ethic, 1907.” In The Protestant Ethic Debate: Max Weber's Replies to his Critics 1907—10, edited by Chalcraft David J. and Harrington Austin translated by Austin Harrington and Mary Shields, 27-29. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2001.
    Francois Flahault. Malice. Translated by Heron Liz. London: Verso, 2003.
    Foucault Michel. “A Preface to Transgression.” In Essential Works: Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, Vol. 2, 69-87. London: Penguin: Books, 2000.
    Foucault Michel. “Politics and Reason.” In Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977-84, edited by Kritzman Lawrence D. 57-85. New York: Routledge, 1990.
    Foucault Michel. “Subjectivity and Truth.” In The Politics of Truth, edited by Lotringer Sylvereand Hochroth Lysa 171-98. New York, NY: Semiotext(e), 1997.
    Freud Sigmund. “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego.” In Civilization, Society and Religion, Vol. 12, translated by Freud Sigmundand Stratchey James 89-184. New Delhi: Shrijee's Book International, 2003.
    Fruzzeti Lina Ostor Akos and Burnett Steve. “The Cultural Construction of the Person in Bengal and Tamil Nadu.” In Concepts of Person: Kinship, Caste and Marriage in India, edited by Akos Ostor, Lina Fruzzeti and Burnett Steve 8-30. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1983.
    Marc Galanter. Law and Society in Modern India. Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1992.
    Gandhi M. K. Prohibition at Any Cost. Compiled by Prabhu R. K. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1960a.
    Gandhi M. K. Voluntary Poverty (Compiled by Prabhu R. K). Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1960b.
    Gandhi M. K. Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Vol. 25. India: The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1967.
    Gandhi M. K. The Essential Writings of Mahatma Gandhi. Edited by Raghavan Iyer. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1991.
    Gandhi M. K. 1996/1991. The Essential Writings of Mahatma Gandhi (ed. Iyer Raghavan). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    Gandhi M. K. M.K. Gandhi's Hind Swaraj: A Critical Edition. Edited by Sharma Suresh and Suhrud Tridip. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan, 2010.
    Sean Gaston. Derrida and Disinterest. Continuum: London, 2005.
    Geras Norman. “Seven Types of Obloquy: Travesties of Marxism.” In Socialist Register, edited by Miliband Ralph Panitch Leo and Saville John 134. London: The Merlin Press, 1990.
    Galinsky Judah D. “Jewish Charitable Bequests and Hekdesh Trust in Thirteenth-Century Spain.Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34, no. 3 (2005): 423-10.
    Ernest Gellner. Reason and Culture: The Historic Role of Rationality and Rationalism. UK: Blackwell, 1992.
    Terry Gifford. Pastoral. London: Routledge, 1999.
    Goldsmith M. M. Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville ‘s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
    Gonda J. 1964. ‘Gifts’ and ‘Giving’ in the Rigveda. Hosiarpur: Vishveshvaranand Vedic Research Institute, Sadhu Ashram, 1964. (Reprinted from Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal 2, no. 1 (1964).
    Gore M. S.The Professional Social Worker.In History and Philosophy of Social Work in India, edited by Wadia A. R. Bombay: Allied Publishers Private Limited, 1968, 27-34.
    Leslie Griffin. “The Problem of Dirty Hands.The Journal of Religious Ethics 17, no. 1(1989): 31-61.
    Gross Robert A. “Giving in America: From Charity to Philanthropy.” In Charity, Philanthropy and Civility in American History, edited by Friedman Lawrence and McGarvie Mark D. 29-48. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
    Ranajit Guha. History at the Limit of World-History. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    Gupta Dipankar. “The Domesticated Public: Tradition, Modernity and the Public/Private Divide.” In The Public and the Private Issues of Democratic Citizenship, edited by Mahajan Gurpreet 56-73. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2003.
    Guthrie W. K. C. A History of Greek Philosophy, The Earlier PreSocraticsand Pythagoreans the Vol. 1. London: Cambridge University Press, 1962.
    Habermas Jurgen. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article.New German Critique 3, no. 51 (1974): 49-55.
    Habermas Jurgen. “The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies.” In The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, translated by Nicholsen S. W. 48-70. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.
    Habermas Jurgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Translated by Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Cambridge, 1993.
    Habermas Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Berger T. Great Britain: Blackwell Publishers & Polity Press, 1996a.
    Habermas Jurgen. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere's.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun Craig 421-61. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996b.
    Habermas Jurgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1998.
    Habermas Jurgen. “Walter Benjamin: Consciousness-Raising or Rescuing Critique.” In On Walter Benjamin: Critical Essays and Recollections, edited by Smith Gary 90-128. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999.
    Habermas Jurgen. Truth and Justification. Edited and translated by Fultner Barbara. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.
    Hiralal Haldar. Hegelianism and Human Personality. Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1910.
    Hiralal Haldar. Neo Hegelianism. London: Heath Cranton Ltd, 1927.
    Hamacher Werner. “The Promise of Interpretation: Reflections on the Hermeneutical Imperative in Kant and Nietzsche.” In Looking After Nietzsche, edited by Rickels Lawrence A. 19-47. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.
    Hamacher Werner. Premises: Essays on Philosophy and Literature from Kant to Celan. Translated by Fenves Peter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
    Hamacher Werner. Pleroma—Reading in Hegel: The Genesis and Structure of a Dialectical Hermeneutics in Hegel. Translated by by Walker N. and S. Jarvis. London: The Athlone Press, 1998.
    Hands A. R. Charities and Social Aid in Greece and Rome. Great Britain: Thames and Hudson, 1968.
    Mukhia Harbans, ed. French Studies in History, Vol. II, 214-22. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 1988.
    David Hardiman. Gandhi in His Time and Ours. Delhi: Permanent Black, 2003.
    Hastings James. “Altruism.” In Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 1, 354-58. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1974 (1908).
    Martin Heidegger. The Question of Being. Translated by Kluback W. and Wilde J. T. New York, NY: Twayne Publishers, 1956.
    Martin Heidegger. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie J. and Robinson E. San Francisco, CA Harpe, 1962.
    Heidegger Martin. What is Called Thinking? Translated by Glenn J. Gray, 62. New York, NY: Perennial, 1976.
    Heidegger Martin. Early Greek Thinking. Translated by Krell D. F. and Capuzzi F. A. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, 1984.
    Hegel G. W. F. Hegel's Philosophy of Mind (Translated from The Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences). Translated by William Wallace. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894.
    Hegel G. W. F. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, Vol. II. Translated by Rev Speirs E. B. and Sanderson J. Burdon. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd, 1895.
    Hegel G. W. F. Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 1. Translated by Haldane E. S. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1955 (1892).
    Hegel G. W. F.Love.” In On Christianity: Early Theological Writings. Translated by Knox T. M. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks, 1961, 302-08.
    Hegel G. W. F. Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Translated by Miller A. V. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
    Hegel G. W. F. Natural Law. Translated by Knox T. M. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.
    Hegel G. W. F. The Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, Vol. II. Translated by Petry M. J. Holland: D. Reidelberg Company, 1979.
    Hegel G. W. F. Lectures on the philosophy of World History, Introduction: Reason in History. Translated by H. B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
    Hegel G. W. F. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion (One Volume Edition, The Lectures of 1827). Edited by Hodgson Peter C. translated by Brown R. F. Hodgson P. C. and Stewart J. M. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.
    Hegel G. W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by Nisbet H. B. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
    Hegel G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Miller A. V. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass Publishers, 1998a.
    Hegel G. W. F.The Difference Between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy: The Need of Philosophy.” In The Hegel Reader, edited by Houlgate Stephen 40-43. UK: Blackwell Publishers, 1998b.
    David Heyd. Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
    Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.
    Hocart A. M. Kingship. London: Oxford University Press, 1927.
    Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan, 1998. Ed. Gaskin J. C. A. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hobbes Thomas. (1969 edition) 2013. The Elements of Law: Natural and Politic. Edited by Tonnies Ferdinand New York: Routledge.
    Holland, Sir Erskine Thomas. 1924. Elements of Jurisprudence, Calcutta: Progressive Publishers.
    Hollis Martin. “Dirty Hands.British Journal of Political Science 12, no. 4(1982): 385-98.
    Horden Peregrine. 2005. “The Earliest Hospitals in Byzantium, Western Europe, and Islam,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34, no. 3 (2005): 361-89.
    Edward Hussey. The Presocratics, London: Duckworth, 1983.
    Jean Hyppolite. Studies on Marx and Hegel. Translated by O'Neill John. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers, 1969.
    Jean Hyppolite. Genesis and Structure of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Cherniak S. and Heckman J. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1974.
    Irwin T. H. 1999. “Generosity and Property in Aristotle's Politics.Social Philosophy and Policy 4, no. 2 (1999): 37-54. (In Aristotle: Critical Assessments, Vol. IV, edited by Gerson Lloyd P. 164-81. London: Routledge, 1999.)
    Jacobs Sally Abell Jessica Stevens Martin Wilberforce Mark Challis David Manthorpe Jill Jose-Luis Fernandez, Glendinning Caroline Jones Karen Knapp Martin Moran Nicola and Ann Netten. “The Personalization of CARE Services and the Early Impact on Staff Activity Patterns.Journal of Social Work 13, no. 2 (2011): 141-63.
    James Henry. “The Turn of the Screw.” In The Great Short Novels of Henry James. Mumbai, India: Jaico Publishing House, 2002, 627-748.
    Jayakar M. R. The Story of My Life, Vol. II. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1958.
    Jones Gareth Stedman. “Hegel and the Economics of Civil Society.” In Civil Society: History and Possibilities, edited by Kaviraj Sudiptaand Khilnani Sunil 105-30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
    Immanuel Kant. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Infield Louis. New York, NY: Harper and Row: New York, 1963.
    Immanuel Kant.What is Enlightenment?” In Critique of Practical Reason, and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, edited by Kant Immanuel Beck Lewis White. New York, NY: Garland Publishing, 1976.
    Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    Alan Keith-Lucas. 1976. “The Art and Science of Helping.” In Talking About Welfare: Readings in Philosophy and Policy Social edited by Timms Noel and Watson David. London: Routledgeand Paul Kegan 267-89.
    Hagi Kenaan. The Present Personal: Philosophy and the Hidden Face of Language. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2005.
    Theodore Kisiel. The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
    Klain Maurice. “Polities’: Still a Dirty Word.The Antioch Review 15, no. 4(1955): 457-66.
    Pierre Klossowski. Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle. Translated by Smith Daniel W. London: Continuum, 2005 (1997).
    Kristol Irving. “Machiavelli and the Profanation of Politics.” In his Reflections of a Neo Conservative: Looking Back, Beyond Looking 123-35. New Delhi: Allied Publishers, 1986.
    Koestler Arthur. 1969. “Darkness at Noon.” In The Political Imagination in Literature, edited by Green Philip and Walzer Michael. New Yok, NY: The Free Press, 192-205.
    Sarah Kofman. Nietzsche and Metaphor. Translated by Large Duncan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.
    Alexandre Kojeve. Outline of a Phenomenology of Right. Translated by Frost B. P. and Howse R. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc, 2007.
    Hajira Kumar. Social Work: An Experience and Experiment in India. New Delhi: Gitanjali Publishing House, 1994.
    Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Jean-Luc Nancy. Retreating the Political, xiv-xxviii. Edited by Parks Simon. London: Routledge, 1997.
    Ernesto Laclau and Zac Lilian. “Minding the Gap: The Subject of Politics.” In The Making of Political Identities, edited by Laclau Ernesto 11-39. London: Verso, 1994.
    Laski Harold J. The Foundations of Sovereignty. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1931(1921).
    Lefort Claude. “The Image of the Body and Totalitarianism.” In The Political forms of Modern Society, edited by Thompson John B. 292-306. Delhi: Disha Publications, 1989.
    Lewis William. “Savings Banks.” In Social Policy, 1830—1914 edited by Evans, 1978.
    Emmanuel Levinas. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Lingis Alphonso. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2000.
    Levinas Emmanuel. “A Man-God?” In Entre Nous: Thinking-of-the-other. Translated by Smith Michael B. and Harshav Barbara. London: Continuum, 2007, 46-52.
    Emmanuel Levinas. Entre Nous: Thinking—of-the-Other. Translated by Smith Michael B. and Harshav. London: Continuum, 2007.
    Emmanuel Levinas.Is Ontology Fundamental.” In Entre Nous: Thinking-of-the-Other, translated by Smithand Michael B. Harshav Barbara 1-10. London: Continuum, 2007.
    Lloyd Vincent. “On Gillian Rose and Love.Telos 2008, no. 143 (2008): 47-62.
    John Locke. Two Treatises of Government. London: J.M Dent & Son's Ltd. (Everyman's Library), 1982 (1924).
    Long Joseph R. “Notes on Roman Law: Law of Persons, Law of Contracts.1912. Available at: https://archive.org/stream/cu31924021206804/cu31924021206804_djvu.txt (accessed on August 11, 2017).
    Niklas Luhmann. Political Theory in the Welfare State. Translated by Bednarz John Jr. New York, NY: Walter De Gruyter Berlin, 1990.
    Lymbery Mark. Review of Catherine Needham, Personalising Public Services: Understanding the Personalisation Narrative (Bristol: Policy Press, 2013). Critical Social Policy 33, no. 1 (2013): 187-89.
    Jean-Francois Lyotard. “The Desire Named Marx.” In Libidinal Economy, translated by Grant I. H. 94-150. London: Continuum, 2005 (1993).
    Niccolo Machiavelli. The Prince. Translated and edited by Adams Robert M. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1992.
    Alisdair Maclntyre. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 1984.
    Macpherson C. B.The Theory of Property Right.” In The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Hobbes to Locke, 197-221. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
    Madan T. N.Of the Social Categories ‘Private’ and ‘Public’: Considerations of Cultural Context.In Mahajan 88-102. 2003.
    Maitland F. W. State, Trust and Corporation. Edited by Runciman D. and Ryan M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    Maria Malatesta. Professional Men, Professional Women: The European Professions from the Nineteenth Century until Today. Translated by Belton A. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2011.
    Manning Paul. “Owning and Belonging: A Semiotic Investigation of the Affective Categories of a Bourgeois Society.Comparative Studies in Society and History 46, no. 2 (2004): 300-25.
    Manshardt Clifford. “Social Work During the British Period.” In History and Philosophy of Social Work in India, edited by Wadia A. R. 25-35. Bombay: Allied Publishers Private Limited, 1968.
    Marshall T. H. Social Policy. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1965.
    Marshall T. H.Voluntary Action.” In Sociology at the Crossroads and Essays other 329-41. London: Heinemann, 1963a.
    Marshall T. H.The Recent History of Professionalism in Relation to Social Structure and Social Policy.” In Sociology at the Cross Roads, 150-70. 1963b.
    Marshall T. H.Citizenship and Social Class.” In The Foundations of the Welfare State, Vol. 1. Edited by Goodin Robert E. and Mitchell Deborah. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2000.
    Karl Marx. Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy. Edited by Bottomore T. B. and Rubel M. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1961.
    Karl Marx.A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right’ (1843).In The Young Hegelians: An Anthology, edited by Stepelevich L. S. 310-22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
    Martinich A. P. A Hobbes Dictionary, Cambridge: Blackwell, 1995.
    Mathews John H. Treatise on the Doctrine of Presumption and Presumptive Evidence as Affecting the Title to Real and Personal Property. London: Joseph Butterworth and Son, Law Booksellers, 1827.
    Mueller F. MaxKeshub Chunder Sen.” In Keshub Chunder Sen, edited by Mukherjee Nanda Calcutta: F. Max Mueller, 1976.
    Iain McCalman. Radical Underworld, Prophets, revolutionaries, and Pornographers in London, 1795-1840. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
    Mcintosh Marjorie K. “Poverty, Charity, and Coercion in Elizabethan England.Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34, no. 3 (2005): 423-40.
    McTaggart J. E.The Personality of the Absolute.” In Studies in Hegelian Cosmology. Available at: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mctaggart/cosmology/ch03.htm, para 70 (accessed on July 13, 2008).
    McTaggart J. E. and McTagart Ellis. Studies in Hegelian Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1918 (1901).
    Mead George H. Mind, Self, and Society, From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Edited by Morris Charles W. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1972 (1934).
    Mill John Stuart. “On Liberty.” In Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government. New York, NY: J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd, 1936 (1910).
    Molesworth W. N.Co-operation.” In Social Policy, 1830-1914: Individualism, Collectivism and the Origins of the Welfare State, edited by Evans Eric J. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.
    Arthur Monahan. From Personal Duties towards Personal Rights: Late Medieval and Early Modern Political thought, 1300—1600. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press, 1994.
    Montefiore Alan. “Identity and Integrity.In Multiculturalism, Liberalism and Democracy, edited by Bhargava Rajeev Bagchi Amiya and Sudarshan R. 58-79. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Morales Armado T., and Sheafor Bradford W. Social Work: A Profession of Many Faces. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998 (1977).
    Morris Debra. 2000. “Privacy, Privation, Perversity: Toward New Representations of the Personal.Signs 25, no. 2 (2000): 322-51.
    Meaghan Morris. The Pirate's Fiancee. London: Verso, 1988.
    Bhudeb Mukhopadhyaya. Samajik Probondho in Bhuudeb Rachanasambhar, 1—263. Edited by Bishi Pramathanath. Kolkata: Mitra O Ghosh, 1968.
    Thomas Nagel. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.
    Nair Janaki. “Beauty by Banning.The Telegraph, Kolkata, October 23, 2003.
    Nancy Jean Luc. “Shattered Love.” In A Finite Thinking, edited by Parks Simon 245—74. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.
    Ashis Nandy. The Illegitimacy of Nationalism: Rabindranath Tagore and the Politics of Self in his Return from Exile, 1-94. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001 (1998).
    Motilal Nehru. Selected Works of Motilal Nehru, Vol. 3. Edited by Kumar Ravinder and Panigrahi D. N. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Limited, 1984.
    Nickel James W. Making Sense of Human Rights: Philosophical Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987.
    Nietzsche Friedrich. “Philosophy During the Tragic Age of the Greeks (1873).” In Early Greek Philosophy and Essays other translated by Mugge Maximilian A. 71-170. London: T.N. Foulis, 1911.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. The Will to Power. Translated by Kaufmann Walter and Hollingdale R. J. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1968.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Translated by Kaufman Walter and Hollingdale R. J. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1989.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. Basic Writings of Nietzsche. Translated by Kaufmann Walter. New York, NY: The Modern Library, 2000.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. On the Genealogy of Morals In Basic Writings of Nietzsche, 437-599. Translated by Kaufmann Walter. New York: The Modern Library, 2000.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future in Walter Kaufmann (transi. & ed.)Basic Writings of Nietzsche, 179-136. New York: The Modern Library, 2000.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. Writings from the Late Notebooks. Translated by Sturge Kate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    Friedrich Nietzsche. The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo Twilight of the Idols, and Writings Other 69-151. Translated by Norman Judith. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    Friedrich Nietzsche.Homer and Classical Philology.” In The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, Vol. III, edited by Levy Oscar translated by Kennedy J. M. 1910. Available as Project Gutenberg E-Book #18188, Released on April 17, 2006 (accessed on October 8, 2008).
    Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche: Selected Stories. New Delhi: Mahaveer Publishers, 2011.
    Sister Nivedita. “The Civic Ideal.” In Civic Ideal and Indian Nationality in The Complete works of Sister Nivedita, Vol. IV, 205-325. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1996.
    Nivedita Sister. “The Civic Ideal.The Modern Review 3, no. 1 (1908): 1-4.
    Oosterhout J. Van. The Quest for Legitimacy: On Authority and Responsibility in Governance. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Erasmus University, 2000.
    David Owen. Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. New York, NY: Routledge, 1994.
    Parent W. A.Privacy, Morality, and the Law.Philosophy and Public Affairs 12, no. 4 (2003): 269-88.
    Derek Parfit. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
    Pateman Carole. “Hegel, Marriage, and the Standpoint of Contract.” In Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, edited by Patricia Jagentowicz Mills, 209-23. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.
    Perlman Harris Helen. “The Person.” In Social Case Work: A Problem Solving Process, 6-26. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1957.
    Pierce Charles Sanders. “The Principles of Phenomenology.” In Philosophical Writings of Pierce, edited by Buchler Justus 75-97. New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1955.
    Plato. “Apology.” In The Trial and Death of Socrates, translated by A G. M. Grube, 21-42. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company Inc, 1975.
    Pollock Sir Frederick and Maitland Frederic William. The History of Law English, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.
    Pratt J. Tidd.The Principles of Friendly Societies.” In Social Policy, 1830—1914: Individualism, Collectivism and the Origins of the welfare state, edited by Evans Eric J. 104 London: Routledge & Paul Kegan, 1978.
    John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Ray Rajat Kanta. The Felt Community, Commonality and Mentality Before the Emergence of Indian Nationalism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    Frederic Reamer. Social Work Values and Ethics. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, 2005.
    Andrew Reeve. Property. London: Macmillan, 1986.
    Chris Rojek Peacock Geraldine and Stewart Collins. Social Work and Received Ideas. London: Routledge, 1988.
    Gillian Rose. Hegel Contra Sociology. London: Athlone, 1981.
    Gillian Rose. Dialectic of Nihilism: Post-structuralism and Law. England: Basil Blackwell, 1984.
    Rousseau Jean Jacques. The Social Contract. Translated by Cranston Maurice. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.
    Rousseau Jean Jacques. The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses. Edited by Dunn Susan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Pres, 2002.
    Motilal Roy. Bharatiya Samgha Tatva [Bengali]. Prabartak Publishing House: Kolkata, 1932.
    David-Hill Ruben. “Review of The Reality of Social Groups” by Sheehy Paul. Mind 117, no. 467(2008): 731-35.
    David Runciman. Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    Ruud Arild Engelsen. Poetics of Village Politics, The Making of West Bengal's Rural Communism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    David Sacks. Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World. New York, NY: Facts on File, Inc, 1995.
    Edward Said. Orientalism. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2001 (1978).
    Swami Sarbagananda. Bhavprachar O Samgathan, [Bengali]. Kolkata: Udbodhon Karyalaya, 2003.
    Sarkar Benoy Kumar. The Political Institutions and Theories of the Hindus: A Study in Comparative Politics. Leipzig: Verlag Von Markert & Petter, 1922.
    Sarkar Benoy Kumar. The Positive Background of Hindu Sociology, Introduction to Hindu Positivism. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas, 1985.
    Sarkar Benoy Kumar. “Daridranarayner Samaj-shastra.” In Samaj Vijnan, 59-80. Calcutta: Chakraborty Chatterjee Company Limited, 1938.
    Sartre Jean Paul. “Dirty Hands.” In The Political Imagination in Literature, edited by Green Philipand Walzer Michael 206-19. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1969.
    Max Scheler. Philosophical Perspectives. Translated by Haac Oscar A. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1958.
    Max Scheler. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Translated by Frings Manfred S. and Funk Roger L. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
    Schelling F. W. J. Historico-critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology. Translated by Richey M. and Zisselsberger M. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2007.
    Carl Schmitt. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab George. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.
    Schneck Stephen Frederick. Person and Polis: Max Scheler's Personalism as Political Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1987.
    Schoeman Ferdinand. “Privacy: Philosophical Dimensions of the Literature.” In Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, edited by Schoeman Ferdinand 133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
    Seal Brajendranath. “The Neo Romantic Movement in Literature (1890-91).” In New Essays in Criticism. Calcutta: Papyrus, 1994 (1903).
    Seal Brajendranath. Rammohun Roy: The Universal Man. Calcutta: Sadharan Brahmo Samaj, 1933.
    Seal Brajendranath. Bangla Rachana [Bengali]. Edited by Ghosh Tapankumar. Kolkata: Patralekha, 2013.
    Sealander Judith. “Curing Evils at Their Source: The Arrival of Scientific Giving.” In Charity, Philanthropy and Civility in American History, edited by Friedman and McGarvie, 217-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    Amartya Sen. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London: Penguin Books, 2005.
    Sen Keshub Chandra. “The Brahmo Samaj, or Theism in India.” In The Golden Book of Rammohun Roy, edited by Mohan Saroj Mitra. Calcutta: Rammohun Library & Free Reading Room, 1997.
    Sen Keshub Chandra. “Keshab Chandra Sen defends his conduct in regard to Cooch Behar Marriage.In Keshub Chunder Sen by Mueller F. Max edited by Mukherjee Nanda Appendix-III, 69-73. Calcutta: S. Gupta and Brothers, 1976.
    Sen Keshub Chandra. “Asia's Message to Europe.” In Keshub Chunder Sen by Mueller F. Max, edited by Mukherjee Nanda Appendix VIII, 103-17. Calcutta: S. Gupta and Brothers, 1976.
    Sengupta ShuddhabrataDiscussing the Public Domain.” In Sarai Reader 01, 1-9. New Delhi: Sarai-CSDS, 2001.
    Sen Samita. “Offences Against marriage: Negotiating Custom in Colonial Bengal.” In A Question of Silence: The Sexual Economics of Modern India, edited by John and Mary E. Nair Janaki 77-110. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 1998.
    Richard Sennett. The Fall of Public Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
    Andrew Seth. Hegelianism and Personality (1887). In G. W. F. Hegel: Critical Assessments Vol. II, edited by Stern Robert 20-40. London: Routledge, 1998.
    Sanjay Sharma. Famine, Philanthropy and the Colonial State: North India in the Early Nineteenth Century, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    Shiffman Gary. “Construing Disagreement: Consensus and Invective in ‘Constitutional’ Debate.Political Theory 30, no. 2 (2002): 175-203.
    Georg Simmel. The Philosophy of Money. Translated by Bottomore Tom and David Frisby. London: Routledge, 1990.
    Georg Simmel.The Poor Person.” In Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, Vol. 2, 409-42. Translated by Blasi A. J. Jacobs A. K. and Kanjirathinkal Mathew. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2009.
    Georg Simmel. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, Vol. 1. Translated by Blasi A. J. Jacobs A. K. and Kanjirathinkal Mathew. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2009.
    Quentin Skinner. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 (1978).
    Samuel Smiles. Self Help. Mumbai: Wilco Publishing House: 2004 (1986).
    Gary Smith ed. On Walter Benjamin: Critical Essays and Recollections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988, 292-325.
    Spivak Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Towards a History of the Vanishing Present. Calcutta: Seagull, 1999.
    Stace William Terence. The Philosophy of Hegel: A Systematic Exposition. New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1995.
    Leo Strauss. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Translated by Sinclair Elsa M. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1963.
    Sutherland S. L.The Problem of Dirty Hands in Politics: Peace in the Vegetable Trade.Canadian Journal of Political Science 28, no. 3 (1995): 479-507.
    Surbhi Tiwari and Chatterjee ArnabDeathly Silence.Hindustan Times, August 13, 2004. (Jointly Authored).
    Tiwari Surbhi. “Ashis Nandy and the Making of Critical Neo-Gandhian Discourse on Development.Paper in UGC DRS Programme’ Compendium Volume, Calcutta University, 2005.
    Tiwari Surbhi. “The Corrupt Son of the Erupting City: Kolkata in Law and Lovely Matters Like Relationships.Fellowship paper presented at CSDS, Delhi, in October 2006 for SARAI, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), Delhi, October 2006.
    Tiwari Surbhi. “Sexy Dresses, Erotic Spaces: The Sport of Spatial Identity in an Indian Muslim Tennis Woman.Paper presented at the “Engaging Islam: Feminisms, Religiosities and Self Determinations” conference organized by the Fall Institute, University of Massachusetts, Boston, September 12-16, 2007.
    Tiwari Surbhi. “Whither Formalism, Fundamentalism or Feminism? Mirza Sania ‘Sexy’ Dressing and the Politics of Youth Perception.” Research paper commissioned by Konrad Adenauer Foundation along with Lokniti, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), New Delhi, 2007.
    Tiwari Surbhi. “Women's’ Studies for Clothing, Feminism for Dress? An Inquiry into Gender and Genre.Working paper presented at the Indian Association of Women's Studies (IAWS) Conference, Lucknow, 2008.
    Amalesh Tripathi. Italir Renaissence, Bangalir Sanskriti [Bengali]. Calcutta: Ananda Publishers, 1996.
    Charles Taylor. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
    Charles Taylor.Modern Social Imaginaries.14, no.l (2002): 91-124.
    Thakur Rabindranath. “Shoksawbha.” In Prabandha Samagra, Vol. II, 505-10. Kolkata: Bikas Grantha Bhavan, 2003.
    Thakur Rabindranath. “Gora.” In Uponyas Sangraha [Bengali], 1-320.Kolkata: Juthika Book Stall, 2002.
    Thakur Rabindranath. Prabandha Samagra, 3 vols. Kolkata: Bikash Grantha Bhavan, 2003.
    Thapar Romila. “Dana and Daksina [Bengali]: A Form of Exchange.” In Cultural Pasts: Essays in Early Indian Genealogy, 521-35. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    Kevin Thompsonand Esmbree Lester eds. Phenomenology of the Political. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
    Titmuss Richard. M. “Who Is My Stranger?” In Talking about Welfare: Readings in Philosophyand Policy Social edited by Timms Noeland Watson David 207-36. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.
    Ferdinand Tonnies. Community and Civil Society. Translated by Harris Joe and Margaret Hollis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. First published in 1887.
    Trivedi Ramendra Sundar. “Mukti.” In Jiggasa, 171-209. Kolkata: Granthamala, 1982.
    Rajinder Vora and Palshkar Suhas eds. Indian Democracy: Meanings and Practices, 215-32. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2004.
    Wadia A. R. ed. History and Philosophy of Social Work in India. Bombay: Allied Publishers Private Limited, 1968.
    Walzer Michael. “Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands.Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, no. 2 (1973): 160-80.
    Michael and Walzer Green Philip eds. The Political Imagination in Literature. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1969.
    Michael Walzer and Green Philip eds. “The Problem of Choice.” In The Political Imagination in Literature, 206-19. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1969.
    Warren Samuel D., and Brandeis Louis D.The Right to Privacy.Harvard Law Review 4, no. 5(1890): 193-220.
    Waterfield Robin trans. The First Philosopher s: The Presocratics and the Sophists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    Max Weber. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Vol. II. Edited by Roth Guenther and Wittich Claus. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1978.
    Max Weber.Intermediate Reflections on the Economic Ethics of the World Religions: Theory of the Stages and Directions of Religious Rejection of the World.” In The Essential Weber: A Reader, edited by Whimster Sam 215-44. London: Routledge: London, 2004.
    Max Weber.Science as a Vocation.In Max Weber's Complete Writings on Academics and Vocations Political translated by Wells Gordon C. 25-42. New York, NY: Algora Publishing, 2008.
    Wijze Stephen De. “Tragic Remorse—The Anguish of Dirty Hands.Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7, no. 5 (2005): 453-17.
    Raymond Williams. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, Croom Helm, 1976.
    Kathleen Woodroofe. From Charity to Social Work: In England and the United States. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.
    Yack Bernard. “Rhetoric and Public Reasoning: An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation.Political Theory 34, no. 4 (2006): 417-38.
    Zaretsky Eli. “Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of the Public/Private Distinction.” in Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Calhoun and Growan Mc 207-31. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
    Slavoj Zizek. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso, 1997.

    About the Author

    Dr Arnab Chatterjee is former Associate Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences at the School of Law at Auro University, Surat, Gujarat. Previously he was a Fellow in social and political philosophy at the Indian Institute of Advanced Study (HAS), Shimla, India. With diverse departmental affiliations and degrees in political science, social work, sociology, history and philosophy, he has been a faculty in pluri-disciplinary social sciences at various institutes and universities across India and West Bengal, including Yashwant Rao Chavan Academy of Development Administration (YASHADA), Pune; Jadavpur University, Kolkata; Vidyasagar University, West Bengal University of Technology etc. teaching social philosophy, applied sociology, social work, jurisprudence, political thought, engineering ethics, and more. He has held Ford Foundation and Enreca (the Netherlands) research fellowships from the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSSC), Kolkata, and the SARAI initiative of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), New Delhi. His first book Categorical Blue: Personalytic Ethics in Social Work and Other Structures of Helping was published in 2017.


    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website