Publication Year: 2000
Grassroots Associations is a comprehensive review and critique of empirical and theoretical research on grassroots, nonprofit and voluntary organizations. David Horton Smith examines in depth the distinctive nature and characteristics of a previously under-studied area which includes such groups as Alchoholics Anonymous, community-environmental action committees and church Bible study groups. He addresses: group formation, structure, process, leadership, and life cycle change; effectiveness; the influence such associations have on society; the future of grassroots associations, which he sees as integral to a postmodern society moving towards participatory democracy, self-determinism and individual choice.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Part I: Toward a Round-Earth Paradigm for the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector
- Nonprofit-Type Classifications
- Chapter 1: Definitions and Metaphors
- The Connotative Definition of Grassroots Associations
- Some Broader Background on the Study of Associations
- The Astrophysical Dark Matter Metaphor
- The Mapmaking Metaphor and the Flat-Earth VNPS Paradigms
- Toward a Theory of Voluntary Altruism: Key Definitions
- Chapter 2: Revising Flat-Earth Maps: The Rest of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector
- Numbers of Associations and all Nonprofits
- People and Roles
- Time and Behavior
- Money and Property
Part II: The Distinctive Nature of Grassroots Associations
- Chapter 3: Formational Characteristics
- The Basic GA Founder Choices
- Chapter 4: Internal Guidance Systems
- Moderate Amounts of Ideology
- Adequate Incentives and Satisfaction
- Secondary Importance of GA Incentives and Roles
- Chapter 5: Internal Structure
- Internal Structure
- Chapter 6: Internal Processes
- Internal Processes
- Chapter 7: Leaders and Environments
- GA Environments and Their Relationships to GAs
- Chapter 8: Life Cycle Changes
- Increasing Complexity in Work Organizations, Including National Associations, with Age
- Complexity and the Life Cycle of GAs
- Causes of Complexity in GAs
- Alternatives to Complexity in GAs
- Other Factors Related to the Age of GAs
- Chapter 9: Impact and Effectiveness
- GA Impact
- GA Effectiveness
- General Effectiveness Studies
Part III: Theoretical Paradigms and Conclusions
- Chapter 10: Flat-Earth Paradigms and a Round-Earth Paradigm Outline
- Metaphors and Paradigms for Understanding the VNPS
- Overview of Flat-Earth VNPS Paradigms
- Outline of a Round-Earth Paradigm of the VNPS
- Rating My Own Success in following the Round-Earth Paradigm
- Chapter 11: Some Conclusions and Forecasts: The Advent of Homo Voluntas
- Long History of the VNPS
- One Nonprofit Sector or Two?
- Using a Balanced Round-Earth Paradigm of the VNPS
- One Contrarian Conclusion: No Financial Crisis for the VNPS as a Whole
- The Role of Volunteer Groups in Society
- The New Social Scientific Discipline of Voluntary Action Studies: 50 to 100 Years Away in the Future
- Policy Recommendations
- Past and Future Trends in VG Prevalence
- Determinants of VG Prevalence Growth Worldwide
- Expansion of Voluntary Role Choices in the Future, Especially in Postindustrial Societies
- The Voluntary Century and Volunteer Millennium: The Advent of Homo Voluntas
[Page ii]For Helen and Karen
Copyright © 2000 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Sage Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
Sage Publications Ltd.
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
Greater Kailash I
New Delhi 110 048 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Smith, David Horton.
Grassroots associations / by David Horton Smith
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8039-5992-3 (cloth: alk. paper)
ISBN 0-8039-5993-1 (pbk.: alk. paper)
1. Associations, institutions, etc.—United States. 2. Nonprofit Organizations—United States. 3. Voluntarism—United States. Social action—United States. I. Title
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquisition Editor: Jim Nageotte/Nancy Hale
Production Editor: Elly Korn
Editorial Assistant: Cindy Bear
Typesetter: Susan Selmer
Cover Designer: Michelle Lee
Key Abbreviations in This Book[Page ix]
GAs = grassroots associations, which are significantly autonomous, formal nonprofit groups that use the associational form or structure, that are volunteer run and composed essentially of volunteers as analytical members, and that have a relatively small local scope (i.e., locally based). Hence, they are one important form of nonprofit group.
VGs = voluntary groups, which are nonprofit groups or any type, whether GAs or based on paid staff, and whether local, national, or international in scope. To be a VG, a significant proportion of a group's analytical members (regular service-providing affiliates) must be acting out of voluntary altruism, as defined in Chapter 1.
VNPS = voluntary nonprofit sector, which is the voluntary, independent, so-called “third sector” of society that manifests voluntary altruism and may be divided into the member benefit subsector and the nonmember benefit subsector. The other three sectors are the household/family sector, the business sector, and the government sector.
David Horton Smith has studied and written about voluntary associations for more than 30 years. He founded the principal scholarly group (the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action) and the principal journal (Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly) in the field. This book might well be his magnum opus. It distills his research and that of more than 2,000 other scholars who have studied what he calls “grassroots associations” (GAs), and it presents important new theoretical constructs for helping us understand these groups.
The book should help rebalance this scholarly field. Smith argues—correctly, in my view—that the past two decades of nonprofit sector scholarship have carried us away from an older, broader, and (in many ways) more accurate view of the organizational phenomenon that lies outside the family, the state, and the market. He claims that recent attention to large, visible “paid-staff nonprofits”—universities, hospitals, cultural organizations, and social service agencies such as the YMCA, the Salvation Army, and Catholic Charities—ignores perhaps 90% of the real voluntary or nonprofit sector, which he calls the “dark matter” of the nonprofit sector, just as physical dark matter constitutes about 90% of the mass of the universe.
In a perfect illustration of the principle that “whatever goes around comes around,” this book brings us back to the larger sociological, anthropological, and historical vision out of which nonprofit studies originally came. It is a much-needed corrective. Although getting data on nonprofit hospitals and universities is easier than getting data on GAs, and although writing about the Ford [Page xi]Foundation and the Metropolitan Museum often is more appealing than writing about self-help groups, book clubs, Bible study groups, choral groups, garden societies, and hobby clubs, the latter groups constitute the bulk of nonprofit effort. This large world of small public benefit organizations, mutual benefit organizations, and unincorporated associations has been largely ignored by mainstream nonprofit scholarship of the past 20 years. Smith's book brings much-needed attention to this dark matter of the nonprofit universe.
Public benefit is, in fact, a questionable term, Smith says. He prefers non-member benefit to public benefit. Although that substitution probably does not have much of a political chance, it is a point worth pondering. Most “public benefit” or “charitable” nonprofits bring some benefits to the special groups served by the agencies as well as to the agencies' staffs, boards, and volunteers. Conversely, many “mutual benefit” or “noncharitable” nonprofits serve some charitable purposes.
An interesting contribution is Smith's attention in passing to socially deviant associations such as the Ku Klux Klan, witches' covens, paramilitary groups, gangs, and cults. He argues that just as the for-profit sector has its Mafia and other embarrassments, the nonprofit sector also has its unpleasant side that is too easily ignored.
The entire book is a critique of excessive attention to “establishment” nonprofits. Smith is particularly critical of the research work of Independent Sector, discussing in some detail its Nonprofit Almanac, giving and volunteering studies, National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities, and other products. He also criticizes the nonprofit academic centers for giving too much attention to paid-staff nonprofits and insufficient attention to GAs. Nor is he totally satisfied with the work of the organization and journal he founded or of the two other scholarly journals in the field (Voluntas and Nonprofit Management and Leadership). Too often, he claims, these promote “flat-earth maps” of the nonprofit sector, ignoring everything except paid-staff, formal, incorporated public benefit nonprofits.
Some of the most interesting parts of the book come in Smith's analysis of the fundamental concept of “voluntary altruism” as well as the organizational characteristics of GAs, such as the organizational life cycle of associations and the organizational effectiveness of associations.
Smith's book is an excellent introduction to a huge amount of research and theory, from many academic disciplines and professions, on voluntary associations. Both experienced scholars and students new to the field will find his long list of references valuable. At different points in the book, Smith says he has come across more than 2,000 references related to the topic, citing about 1,200 of them. He is deeply aware of this community of scholars on whose shoulders his work stands.
Readers will appreciate the short and lucid concluding sections at the end of each chapter.
[Page xii]This is a labor of love, the result of a 30-year love affair with what the author now calls grassroots associations. Smith is one of the relatively few nonprofit scholars who has given serious general attention to the smaller, more informal, often unregistered nonprofit groups. He criticizes people who, in their passion for “bigness and brightness,” ignore the smaller groups. The important thing, he stresses throughout the book, is not the size, wealth, or power of particular nonprofit organizations but, rather, the cumulative impact of the millions of small nonprofit groups.
Readers will find things to like and dislike in this ambitious book. Some might be put off by the long list of references, others by the theoretical discussions. I would quibble with some of the categorization; it seems to me that Smith tends to “over-separate” paid-staff nonprofits and GAs, whereas the reality often is quite mixed. For example, I know of a choral society with a paid music director and a paid half-time assistant as well as 30 to 40 unpaid singers, a 10-person volunteer board, some program volunteers, and so on. This is technically a paid-staff nonprofit and might even fall into the 10% of “light matter” nonprofits, according to Smith, but such a group hardly compares with truly “establishment” nonprofits such as Stanford University and Massachusetts General Hospital.
This is both a general readership book and a serious technical book. It covers a very broad territory. Only a David Horton Smith could have attempted it. We are the beneficiaries of his daring.Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management, University of San Francisco, Professor and Director,
What do the following groups have in common: an Alcoholics Anonymous local group, a Lions Club, a citizens' group organized to prevent siting a toxic waste incinerator in its town, a witches' coven, a Girl Scout troop, a Masonic Lodge, and a Bible reading group of a church? All are what many sociologists for decades have called voluntary associations. I choose to call them grassroots associations (GAs) to emphasize that I am concerned centrally here with voluntary associations that are local in scope, not with supralocal voluntary associations such as state, regional, national, or international associations.
GAs, as I deal with them here, are mainly volunteer in composition, with more volunteer work/activity hours per year than paid-staff hours serving the groups' goals. In very rough terms, GAs and supralocal volunteer groups have less than one paid-staff full-time equivalent (less than 1,700 hours of annual paid staff work for the group). I deal with these and other definitional characteristics of GAs briefly in Chapter 1 and at more length in another document with a colleague (Smith and Dover, forthcoming). Most of the book deals with empirical and theoretical GA characteristics.
I have tried to think of many of the important questions about GAs and then to answer them based on the theory and/or empirical research available including my own. In this process, I hope that I have asked some new questions. I have presented some new theory of my own and/or elaborations of earlier theories where I could and where I felt that it was potentially useful. The very analytical structure of the book's chapters gives an overview of the questions that I think are [Page xiv]most important to ask and answer about GAs as groups and sometimes organizations (formal groups).
I weave together a quarter-century of hitherto widely scattered research and theory in this book. The result is a type of tapestry, with strands of research and strands of theory—the vast majority of it based on the period since the publication of an earlier overview work by C. Smith (no relation) and Freedman (1972; see also D. Smith, 1975, and Knoke, 1986, for overviews). I present and expand on some microtheories of GAs and develop inductively a broad theory of GAs of my own throughout the book. But most important, I have developed a general theoretical and empirical critique of the entire field of nonprofit research in this book. I present this critique briefly and generally here and in Chapter 1, with more detail on this “round-earth” paradigm in every substantive chapter of the book. I treat this metaphor and critique again at length in Chapter 10.
In essence, I argue in this book that there are many “flat-earth” voluntary nonprofit sector (VNPS) paradigms that are distorting the reality of the VNPS in related but different major ways. I define a flat-earth VNPS paradigm as any general perspective on the VNPS that omits major “territories” of the sector. So defined, flat-earth VNPS paradigms can be avoided only by studying VNPS phenomena with great balance and comprehensiveness.
The most widespread example of a flat-earth paradigm among mainstream VNPS scholars existing today is the paid-staff nonprofit flat-earth VNPS paradigm. It overemphasizes the larger, wealthier, older, more visible nonprofits in which most of the work is done by paid staff rather than by volunteers (Hodgkinson and Weitzman, 1992; Hodgkinson et al., 1992). This paradigm emphasizes (a) volunteers in service volunteer programs, which are nonautonomous “volunteer departments” of work organizations, or (b) informal volunteers, who have no organizational auspices for their volunteer activity. About 100 million associational volunteers participating in GAs in the United States circa 1990 are potentially ignored as such (Hodgkinson and Weitzman, 1992; see also Chapter 2).
Most of this book deals with GAs during the past 25 years or so, and for this period mainly GAs and their volunteers in the United States. This means that I am de facto falling prey to the distinctive nationalist focus flat-earth VNPS paradigm and the antihistoricism flat-earth VNPS paradigm in this book (but see Smith, 1997c).
I urge social science and social profession scholars in all countries to contribute to the study of GAs and voluntary action in those countries and in the world as a whole throughout human history and “prehistorical” anthropology and archaeology by making their own attempts at theoretical and empirical syntheses.
[Page xv]The field of nonprofit and voluntary action research (or “nonprofit research”) generally has come a long way during the past 25 years or so since it was “aggregated” by the Association of Voluntary Action Scholars as the forerunner of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA) and by the Journal of Voluntary Action Research as the forerunner of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (see Appendix A). Although still a fledgling field or “discipline,” nonprofit research probably now has a “million-year future.” What has been done during the past quarter-century or more in this nonprofit research field is very tiny relative to the research on nonprofits, including GAs, that is likely to be done during the 21st century or new millennium (Smith, forthcoming b). This field of interest is growing rapidly.
The VNPS, volunteer groups, other nonprofits, and individual volunteering are not likely to suddenly vanish in the future of humankind unless there is a world catastrophe or dictatorship of vast proportions. Hence, there probably always will be a significant and perhaps growing scholarly field that studies such correspondingly growing voluntary action phenomena. The scholarly discipline of economics is likely to still be around for the new millennium because presumably there always will be some significant degree of monetary exchange and other relevant economic phenomena of the business sector among human-kind, wherever people live and for however long they live.
This very long future existence of major social science academic disciplines also is likely to be true with the discipline of political science because there presumably will still be forms and aspects of government, laws, and power for the new millennium if humankind survives that long. Seen in this very long future perspective, or even in the much briefer but still long-term perspective of the 21st century, nonprofit and voluntary action research is a strong contender for most future growth because the VNPS is likely to show the greatest relative growth among the four or five major sectors of human society.
In the final chapter, I predict that the 21st century will be the century of voluntary action and of volunteering as defined in Chapter 1. I see the 19th century as the century of the “industrial person” and the 20th century as the century of the “service/information person,” to be followed by the new century of the “volunteer person” or Homo Voluntas.
I believe this book to be more comprehensive than any other so far published about GAs and their volunteers. I hope that the book will be interesting and instructive to readers of various types, but there is a great deal more to learn and a great deal more literature in sociology and other disciplines that needs to be reviewed and integrated.
- [Page xvi]
- Perhaps some scholars might be influenced to look anew at their general research paradigms and their theoretical and empirical research questions concerning GAs because of the book.
- Perhaps some practitioners might find some useful nuggets of information about GAs in the book. This could be true for paid-staff nonprofit leaders as well as GA leaders because research on GAs has some significant implications for paid-staff nonprofits, especially with regard to volunteer programs located in work organizations such as paid-staff nonprofits, businesses (e.g., proprietary hospitals), and government agencies.
- Perhaps some research funding organizations, such as the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Aspen Institute Nonprofit Sector Research Fund, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, the Lilly Endowment, and other similar funders of some research on nonprofits and volunteer groups, might begin to see more clearly the overall cumulative importance of GAs as the “dark matter” of the nonprofit sector. If they do, then they might correspondingly provide more funds for needed research on GAs, especially comparative research on paid-staff and volunteer nonprofits now lacking, as noted earlier here and later in this book.
In addition to scholars listed in the References section of this book, I also have major intellectual debts owed to a variety of other social science scholars who have done little, if any, significant work in the nonprofit research field, especially Alex Inkeles, my graduate school mentor.
Although I have not had any grants for the literature reviewing or the writing involved, I am grateful for a small grant from the Project on Nonprofit Governance, directed by James R. Wood, of the University of Indiana at Bloomington and the Center on Philanthropy of the Indiana University at Indianapolis. This grant was of significant help in my research on GAs in one suburb (Appendix C), a study that I draw on repeatedly in this book.
I benefited from part-time research assistance from three graduate students in the sociology department at Boston College: Julie Boettcher, Aimee Marlow, and Marlene Bryant (who has been especially competent and helpful in securing documents and in the final stages of preparation of the references). Maureen Eldredge and Eunice Doherty, secretaries of the department, have been my principal long-distance liaisons with my department, sending to me in Florida regular shipments of mail coming to the office at Boston College. I am grateful for their help.
There are many people who I want to thank for helping me directly with the work of researching and writing this book including both professional colleagues and friends/relatives, some of whom are both. My friend, Michael [Page xvii]O'Neill, gave me encouragement to start another book project when I was uncertain whether I could or would ever write another book after a decade-and-a-half “dry spell” given personal and health problems. I now believe that he was right, and I thank him for the perspicacity to see that it was possible and for the kindness to tell me about it. Other close friends, such as Terry Adams, Burt R. Baldwin, Al Hogle, David Karp, Ce Shan, and John Yong, also have been very supportive, as has Gary Prince. Karen Fruzan has been particularly inspirational during the past year or so. I need all of them in my life to keep going and to “do my thing,” as people used to say. I am very grateful that each of these persons exists and wants me in his or her life as well.
My sister, Helen Marie Smith, has made invaluable contributions in affection, moral support, and companionship at crucial times. She also has done a great deal of volunteer work on the extensive references. I could not have written this book without her help in these ways, and I will continue to be deeply grateful for all that she has done for me in my life. My daughter, Laura, also has been a treasure who helps me keep going via telephone calls, even though I see her less often than I would like. My former wife, Barbara, gave me needed moral support and companionship while some ideas for this book were percolating in my mind prior to our separation in 1995.
The two most recent former Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly editors-in-chief, Jon Van Til and Carl Milofsky, have been exceptionally helpful, as have John Messer (former associate editor) and anonymous reviewers, in helping me make “silk purses out of sows' ears.” They often have seen more value in my earlier related articles that I have written than I have been able to see initially myself. Their constructive style of criticism has helped me to feel like reworking my initial pieces for rerunning the gauntlet of peer reviewing.
In this same vein, I appreciate the useful and constructive criticism on articles that are related to, or are parts of, the present book from anonymous reviewers of other major nonprofit research/management journal. Dennis R. Young, editor of Nonprofit Management and Leadership, and Linda Serra, that journal's co-managing editor, have been very helpful in seeking to publish the best version that I was capable of writing for certain articles that are partly included in this book or are roots of present ideas in the book.
Michael A. Dover was of immense help in getting my references organized in computer-readable format. I also received helpful comments from various colleagues on one or more book chapters, and I wish to thank all of them for their time, their minds, and their generosity: Wolfgang Bielefeld, Thomasina Borkman, Mary Anna Caldwell, Justin Davis Smith, Julie Fisher, William Gamson, David Knoke, Mark Lyons, David Mason, Michael O'Neill, Susan Ostrander, Jone Pearce, Richard Sundeen, and Jon Van Til. Unfortunately, I cannot now recall some other colleagues who have commented on much earlier article forms [Page xviii]of some chapters in this book. If I have left out some such people, then it is simply because of my bad memory, not meanness of spirit.
My Sage Publications editors also have been exemplary: James Nageotte, my editor at Sage, and Armand Lauffer, my substantive editor (a professor of social work at the University of Michigan). Nageotte, in particular, was astute enough to see the potential value of my book prospectus when many other publishers to whom I also sent the prospectus could “not find room for it” in their book lists. I could not ask for better editors. I especially appreciate their patience in letting me take the necessary time to do what I thought needed to be done so as to make this book as magnum an opus as I could under the circumstances.
Appendix A: Description of the (Largely North American) Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action[Page 263]
Nonprofit organizations and voluntary action is a growing field of interdisciplinary and interprofessional study. This field began formally in the United States in 1971 when the Center for a Voluntary Society provided seed money through grants to Boston College and part of my paid time as director of research at the center to pursue my idea of developing an academic association for this field. James Shultz, the first director of the center, and later John Dixon, the second director, were instrumental in making these resources available. Those who find congenial the “resource mobilization” perspective on social movement origins and growth (McCarthy and Zald, 1977) will note the parallel here for a nonmovement.
Burt R. Baldwin and Richard D. Reddy, initially as graduate students of mine at Boston College and later as colleagues at their own colleges (Central Connecticut State University and State University of New York at Fredonia, respectively), were of tremendous help to me in getting the new association, the Association of Voluntary Action Scholars (AVAS), formed and going. [Page 264]Eugene D. White, Jr., the first office manager and later executive officer of AVAS, also was virtually indispensable in helping get AVAS going during the first few years. More of this history of the field can be found in “Researching Volunteer Associations and Other Nonprofits: An Emergent Interdisciplinary Field and Potential New Discipline” (Smith, forthcoming b).
Concerted research on nonprofit organizations and voluntary action, applied and scholarly, is a field of study that is, thus, a bit more than 25 years old (Smith, 1993a, 1995e). AVAS, which since has become the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA), has published its journal for more than 25 years. This Journal of Voluntary Action Research, now Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (NVSQ), was the first journal of its kind anywhere focused totally on voluntary action and nonprofit organizations (Smith, 1972a, 1972b).
In 1977, Yale University formed the Program on Non-Profit Organizations (PONPO) as the first university-based research center of its kind in the world. The two entities represented different streams of interest—voluntary action versus nonprofit organizations—that remained separate during the early years. The two traditions were unified, and the journal and organization were renamed in 1989 and 1990, respectively. In 1993, ARNOVA formed a new partnership with PONPO that assumed joint sponsorship of NVSQ under Carl Milofsky as editor-in-chief. When Steven Rathgeb Smith became editor-in-chief in 1998, the NVSQ headquarters location transferred to the University of Washington and the PONPO connection ended. At about the same time, in 1993 the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis began to house ARNOVA headquarters, which previously had been located at Boston College, Pennsylvania State University, Tufts University, and Washington State University. This involved a substantial annual support grant from the center to ARNOVA in addition to space.
ARNOVA is an independent, multidisciplinary, multiprofessional society whose mission is to foster research, both applied and theory oriented, on nonprofit organizations, philanthropy, citizen participation, and voluntary action. Our annual conference provides opportunities for independent scholars and thoughtful practitioners from diverse disciplines and service industries to interact as a community of scholars. More than 500 people participated in the 1999 conference including about 100 non-U.S. participants from 22 nations on four continents and Australia (my computation from 1999 list of participants).
ARNOVA is committed to building nonprofit research as a recognized field of study; remaining a neutral open forum for sound scholarship and research-related activities undertaken by scholars, practitioners, academic centers, and foundations; nurturing new scholars; and defining a common core of learning that constitutes the special field of study.
[Page 265]For more then two decades, ARNOVA's annual conferences have grown in size, diversity, and contribution to knowledge. ARNOVA received more than 500 proposals for the 1999 conference in Arlington, Virginia, up from 125 in 1991, and the number of conference participants has increased correspondingly. The membership of more than 1,000 independent scholars and practitioners at the end of 1999 has grown by more than 100% during the past five years (Anita Plotinsky, personal communication, November 6, 1999). ARNOVA continues to play a groundbreaking role in increasing the depth of knowledge about the nonprofit sector and voluntary action.
The phenomena on which NVSQ is focused are substantial in the United States and elsewhere, as Chapter 2 demonstrates. The variety of individual nonprofits includes Harvard University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital (Chicago), the American National Red Cross, the Audubon Society, the Ford Foundation, the National Association of Social Workers, a local Girl Scouts troop, a local Parent-Teacher Association, a local Alcoholics Anonymous group, a local youth soccer league, and so on. This field has as much distinctiveness as do the economic and government sectors, for the groups we study have a very different structure than do governments and businesses. Nonprofits are not tied to people's voting or taxes in any territory, nor do they seek to distribute profits (indeed, by definition, they cannot distribute any excess revenues to members, their boards, or “owners”). Moreover, nonprofits or VGs are the main organized expression of voluntary altruism in society, along with service volunteer programs.
In addition to this growth within the United States, changes in the former Communist bloc and in less wealthy nations have produced growing interest in nonprofit organizations, voluntary action, and problems of civil society world-wide. ARNOVA always has included many Canadians as well as Americans. Elsewhere, there are many members from the United Kingdom as well as a sprinkling of members from Australia, New Zealand, Israel, continental Europe, Latin America, and elsewhere. At the end of 1999, there were members from 55 countries (ARNOVA, 1999). Although the international community of scholars recently founded an International Society for Third Sector Research, ARNOVA has been an international association from its inception, and NVSQ continues to publish occasional articles from around the world.
For many years, NVSQ has noted in each issue that the journal is interested in research papers on “voluntarism, citizen participation, philanthropy, and nonprofit organizations.” Interested readers of the present book who are not members of ARNOVA might, if interested, inquire of the headquarters office in Indianapolis about a brochure and information on various publications, conferences, and other services. Conferences usually are held in October or November, rotating around the country haphazardly and sometimes meeting in other nations (Canada and the United Kingdom so far). One-page paper proposals are submitted in the spring and are peer-reviewed by a conference program [Page 266]committee. Journal subscriptions should be made through the Indianapolis office. (Please ask your library to subscribe as well.)
The current ARNOVA address is as follows:
Dr. Anita Plotinsky
Executive Director, ARNOVA
Indiana University Center on Philanthropy
550 West North Street, Suite 301
Indianapolis, IN 46202-3162
Appendix B: Creating a Local Nonprofit Sampling Frame Including Grassroots Associations: An American Example[Page 267]
Standard sampling texts (Henry, 1990; Jaeger, 1984; Yates, 1981) say little or nothing about the special problems of sampling semiformal groups and organizations such as nonprofits (defined in Chapter 1) that are nowhere fully listed. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) registration lists of nonprofits in the United States are very biased and incomplete (Dale, 1993; Gronbjerg, 1989, 1994; Smith, 1997d; see also Chapter 2), contrary to what many researchers seem to believe. The IRS lists include primarily larger and nonreligious nonprofits. Religious groups (including churches) with any level of revenues and nonreligious groups with revenues under $5,000 per year at present do not have to register, and most do not (see Chapter 2). With $25,000 revenues per year, a nonprofit must file a Form 990 annual report. Nonregistered nonprofits in the United States include most nonprofits, which usually are small and volunteer run (Smith, 1997d; see also Chapter 2).
Given IRS records as a source for larger nonprofits, often with paid staff, the core of the nonprofit sampling problem is the small volunteer nonprofits. Omitting them makes a quite incomplete sample of nonprofits in any territory. Standard sampling procedures tell us to create a sampling frame (complete list) of [Page 268]nonprofits in a territory when none exists (Jaeger, 1984, p. 6; Yates, 1981, p. 63). One may start with IRS-registered nonprofits in an area, but one must go on from there to create a more complete sampling frame if one wishes to generalize to all nonprofits, not just large paid-staff nonprofits. Gronbjerg's (1989) article on creating a sampling frame for a metropolitan area for paid-staff public benefit nonprofits is a rare and welcome contribution. She shows that the IRS-listed nonprofits are only about half of the total even for such larger and public benefit nonprofits (see also Dale, 1993; Gronbjerg, 1994).
This appendix suggests how such a sample could be even more complete by including volunteer nonprofits (mainly grassroots associations [GAs]) as well as paid-staff nonprofits (Smith, 1981) and by including member benefit groups as well as nonmember benefit groups—all of which are nonprofits (Smith, 1991, 1993b; see also Chapters 1 and 2). Once one has such a sampling frame, either random or systematic sampling of the list will produce a sample of nonprofits that one can study and generalize from to the larger total of nonprofits in the territory. Very few studies have done this.
For many years, researchers studying voluntary associations have been studying the numbers of associations (volunteer nonprofits) in smaller communities (Babchuk and Edwards, 1965; Laskin and Phillett, 1965; Warriner and Prather, 1965). The usual method of identifying such associations has been to seek local lists and to content analyze the local newspaper, if present. Some general fieldwork has accompanied this. In the best-known U.S. instance of full-scale ethnographic fieldwork with special interest in associations in a town (Warner and Lunt, 1941), a much higher frequency of associations per 1,000 population was found than in most other studies (Smith, 1997d; Smith and Baldwin, 1974b, p. 281; see also Chapter 2), indicating that such fieldwork might be the method of choice for maximum completeness without concern for cost.
The problem is the completeness versus cost trade-off. It is very labor intensive and, hence, costly to find GAs on a community, even when starting with a major existing list. Most GAs are not in the IRS tax-exempt list, as noted earlier. A locality (e.g., city, town, county) in the United States may or may not have a good existing list. Hence, there is no reliable “single source” for a reasonably complete nonprofit list in most localities.A Multimethod Comprehensive Sampling Frame Creation Strategy for Nonprofits
The aim of the present multimethod strategy is to improve the completeness of the nonprofit sampling frame over use of lists and newspapers without using (very expensive) full-scale ethnography. The following are the elements of the multimethod strategy. Although developed for use in smaller communities, the approach also can be used for cities or even nations as territories.[Page 269]Strategy 1: Key General Lists of Nonprofits
Find and use any existing general lists or directories of nonprofits in the community. Such lists might be kept by the town clerk, the mayor's or city manager's office, the chamber of commerce, the public library, or some organization interested in promoting business and tourism in the community. These days, the list might be computerized in larger localities. For states and nations (and occasionally counties and larger cities), there might be directories of nonprofits of all types or of a certain type of nonprofit. In the United States, for example, there is the Encyclopedia of National Associations (Jaszczak and Sheets, 1997). For Chicago, Gronbjerg (1989, p. 68) used a metropolitan Chicago social service directory as her third most productive source of paid-staff nonprofits. Hungary has a law requiring all GAs and other nonprofits to register with the government (Kuti, 1998), and most GAs may be included in this registration. France has a similar law, probably with similar results (Lanfant, 1976).
The problem with single lists purporting to be comprehensive is that they almost invariably are not comprehensive. The town clerk in one town I studied produced as “comprehensive” a list of fewer than 10% of the nonprofit organizations I later found in the town using the present comprehensive strategy. In another town, the list produced by a locality promotion/tourism organization was about 80% complete relative to the result of the comprehensive strategy. One cannot be sure about where some supposedly comprehensive list falls on a continuum of completeness until and unless the more comprehensive strategy is used at least in part. However, one can use as a rough guide the knowledge that about 30 nonprofits per 1,000 population usually are present, more in smaller places (Smith, 1997d; see also Chapter 2). The large majority of these are GAs.
Obviously, when there are two or more lists, one creates a master list eliminating overlaps. I favor a small card file. Others might favor a computer file, even initially, especially in a larger locality. One must take care with nonprofit names and name changes to avoid duplicates. I found particular trouble with people calling a nonprofit by the city name (i.e., “Boston …”) versus not doing so. It pays to cross-reference nonprofits with, and again without, locality names to deal with this problem of possible double listing.Strategy 2: Local Mass Media
Strategy 3: Telephone Directories
- Content analyze the local newspapers for mentions of nonprofit organizations. If there is no newspaper exclusively serving the community, then try to find an area newspaper that has a special section on the community or other area of interest. If there are two or more local newspapers serving the area, then try to [Page 270]identify which one pays more attention to nonprofits. The right newspaper to use might not be the primary or larger circulation paper. In my research, weekly newspapers tended to give more coverage to GAs than do daily newspapers. Look for pages in the newspapers that specialize in volunteer group or nonprofit affairs. Occasionally, the person at the newspaper responsible for volunteer and nonprofit activities will have a card or computer file on nonprofits or associations specifically and will give you access to it. Often, this list, if present, is published at least once a year in the local newspaper.
Do not assume that all mentions of nonprofits in a newspaper are to be found on special association or group pages. By sampling pages and days of the week, one can identify additional groups through systematic sampling and content analysis. Be careful to list finally only those nonprofits that are in the community of focus; the boundaries of coverage geographically by a newspaper often are vague. Where territorial coverage of a nonprofit is unclear, this can be checked later by telephone in many cases. Consider a GA as located in whatever town has the largest plurality of members in that GA, irrespective of other evidence suggesting alternative locations. Content analyzing newspapers is labor intensive, but in the experience of myself and others, it is more efficient than full-scale ethnography and is quite effective, especially in identifying volunteer (rather than paid-staff) nonprofits.
- Find local or local-coverage radio stations and seek their records or copies of “public service announcements.” These public service announcements (PSAs) are brief announcements of nonprofit organization activities made over the air by station announcers reading notes or cards sent in by nonprofits, usually GAs. They are more frequent in smaller towns or cities than in larger cities. If you can find a box or basket of these PSA cards at a radio station, it can be very helpful, especially with contact people and addresses. There are fewer of these PSAs now than before the U.S. government deregulation of radio stations during the early 1980s, but they still can be a useful source of information on volunteer and other nonprofits.
Strategy 4: Government General Lists of Nonprofits
- Search the local yellow pages from the telephone company under categories that are likely to yield nonprofits. For example, seek nonprofits under categories such as associations, churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, labor organizations, and social and human services.1 The organizations so identified, like many others identified by other methods, need to be screened individually or on a sampling basis to determine whether they are in fact nonprofits. Businesses can work their way into some of these and other categories.[Page 271]
- Seek in the white (regular) pages of the telephone book for entities listed in all capital letters and/or boldface type, screening for nonprofits with addresses in the target community (in urban areas, single telephone books cover many localities). In very large cities, one may sample pages systematically and use estimation procedures to determine how many additional nonprofits might be in one's frame. There will be many businesses appearing in this source. Most can be identified as businesses by their names and can be omitted (e.g., “Rudy's Cleaners”). Possible nonprofits should be included and later screened as noted earlier. This tactic is tedious and time-consuming but necessary.
Strategy 5: Interviews
- Try to obtain a computerized listing of nonprofits in 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) categorizations from the IRS. These now are generally available for a fee. If these cannot be obtained or afforded, then use the latest cumulative list of organizations issued by this source (U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1979, is an earlier version). Do not assume that this source is complete. It overlooks many smaller, newer, low-budget volunteer nonprofits and most religious nonprofits (Smith, 1997d).
- Try to obtain a computerized list of nonprofits from U.S. state authorities that register nonprofits as part of the state incorporation procedure. Typically, this information is kept by the Office of the Secretary of State. Such lists seldom are published. Some states still keep the information on index cards, I am told. As with the IRS information, this type of nonprofit organization list overlooks many unincorporated, smaller, newer, low-budget, semiformal, or religious volunteer nonprofits.
- At the town or city hall, ask to see (or have a copy of) the list of tax-exempt nonprofit property on the tax rolls. This list of organizations consists of the wealthier nonprofits that are able to own real property and often buildings to meet in and use as headquarters. Sometimes, counties in the United States might have similar or even broader lists.
- At the town or city hall or post office, ask about the full list of nonprofits that are entitled to have their own tax-exempt mailing bulk rate numbers.
Extensive interviewing is quite expensive, especially if viewed from the perspective of number of new nonprofits identified per interview. Nonetheless, this [Page 272]approach has some special advantages in identifying smaller, more informal volunteer nonprofits in a locality.
[Page 273]Strategy 6: Special Lists
- Using Strategies 3(a), 3(b), and 4(c), identify the likely public meeting places for nonprofits (especially volunteer nonprofits) in the community. Then, seek information through telephone or in-person interviews on what groups actually have met there during the past 12 months. The latter process involves many telephone calls and some in-person visits to meeting sites. In larger places, this can be done on a sampling basis. Some examples of probable meeting places include churches and synagogues, libraries, schools, veterans organizations, historical societies, and fraternal organizations. Every nonprofit identified in Strategy 4(c) should be checked as a meeting place on a random sampling basis, if necessary. For schools, officials should be queried regarding both student and parent groups as well as volunteer programs. For churches, one should ask about church-related as well as nonmember groups meeting at the churches, differentiating integral from nonintegral church-related groups (Smith, 1996).
- Key informants in the locality (e.g., nonprofit leaders, local government leaders) can be interviewed regarding the nonprofits with which they are familiar or to which they belong. Local leaders tend to belong to many more volunteer nonprofits than does the average person in the community and, hence, can be a richer source of new nonprofits per interview than can the average citizen. However, even if such leaders are sampled carefully, it is difficult to know how many nonprofits one still might be missing when finished with key informants.
- Interview a representative sample of community residents regarding nonprofits they know, either as a separate process or as part of the initial interviews you perform in the community for some other related purpose. This method shows diminishing returns, but 30 to 50 interviews of this sort can be useful in smaller places (more in larger cities), if only to confirm data from other sources. This tactic can be most sensitive to smaller, poorer, newer, less formal GAs, unlike most other tactics. It is especially effective if done on a careful, representative area-sampling basis, as discussed by Gronbjerg (1989, pp. 77–78) and performed by McPherson (1982). The drawbacks of depending solely on this method are that it fractionates real nonprofit groups in the data collection process and generally substitutes a random member of any group as an informant in place of a leader who is a preferred informant. I believe that identifying the nonprofits first, sampling from a reasonably complete list, and then interviewing leaders (preferably two or more for each nonprofit) is methodologically preferable. Hence, I recommend the present community sampling and interviewing of individuals as an auxiliary rather than the central method.
In addition to general lists, one can find lists of specific types of nonprofits such as in human resource directories, human services directories, “people's yellow pages” (alternative social change-oriented directories), information and referral service directories or card files/computer files, environmental group lists, health-related agency lists, arts and cultural organization lists, ethnic group/minority group lists, community/ethnic housing/economic development group lists, educational institution/group lists, church lists, foundation lists, and trade union lists (most of the forgoing types are taken from Gronbjerg, 1989). Also, one can obtain a list of groups participating in any major local celebrations, parades, and so on from the town or city hall or from the sponsoring organization, if not the local government. This source might be unavailable but is useful if present.
Gronbjerg (1989) suggests examining official registration and license listings, if any, for nonprofits; seeking grant and contract listings for several years from public agencies, foundations, and councils; and using membership lists from coalitions, networks, and task forces. These might turn up some volunteer-run groups as well as paid-staff nonprofits. For all or a sampling of local banks, one might be able to obtain a listing of accounts that are owned by nonprofit organizations, especially associations. The amount of the account usually is private, but the existence or name of the account might not be. This source is very useful but often is hard to obtain, especially in cities. One may similarly seek a list of post office boxes in a locality, some of which will be rented by nonprofits. One can try to obtain a complete list of nonprofit organization mailing permits from the post office. All of these special list procedures tend to be more haphazard in coverage and time-consuming to use than are the general lists. In European nations, lists of post office bank accounts might be available. Finally, lists of community nonprofits can be obtained from high schools and colleges that have community service programs and place students in volunteer work in these groups (Raskoff and Sundeen, 1998).Cleaning the Data
For all of the forgoing strategies, attention must be given to eliminating duplicates with similar names because of typographical errors, mistakes of hearing or memory, incomplete names, and names that do or do not use a locality (or church, school, etc.) name as a preface (e.g., Lions Club vs. Boston Lions Club). One also must try to catch major name changes. For example, the Association of Voluntary Action Scholars changed its name to the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action several years ago; it should not be counted twice in any national count of U.S. nonprofits. One also must strive [Page 274]to eliminate “dead” nonprofits by seeking evidence of some activity, as by self-addressed return postcards. Businesses and government agencies also must be eliminated from the final list. This can be very difficult. In most cases the names are indicative, but not necessarily. For example, Council on Aging might be a government agency, or it might be a nonprofit; the name is not indicative. When names are not indicative, phone calls can help, but profit-seeking firms often do not like to admit to this status if they are trying to pass as nonprofits (Gronbjerg, 1989). Checking with the IRS or state corporation records can help, and for larger businesses, there are standard commercial directories such as Standard & Poor's (1999). Sometimes, the people to whom one speaks at a nonprofit are genuinely uncertain whether they are a nonprofit or a government agency. A discussion of the nonprofit's funding and tax filing status might clarify this; a nonprofit that depends on a single long-term government contract for most of its revenues might confuse its workers regarding government versus nonprofit status. Gronbjerg's (1989, pp. 65–67) comments should be consulted on all of this.Other Countries
There is not a great deal of literature on identifying and counting nonprofits elsewhere any more than there is in the United States. Salamon and Anheier (1994; see also Salamon, Anheier, and Associates, 1998) have made the largest and most systematic effort in this regard as part of their major project with many others. Even where smaller studies of towns or cities in other nations exist, they often are sketchy in their descriptions of how sampling frames were created (Drake, 1972; Koldewyn, 1984, 1986). Yet the meager literature extant suggests that the methods suggested here have some applicability beyond the United States.
In some countries, such as France (Lanfant, 1976; Meister, 1972a) and Malaysia (Douglas, 1972), existing official registries (Strategy 4) of volunteer associations at one government level or another greatly facilitate creating a sampling frame. In such nations, the first priority strategy becomes the use of good general government lists (lists far more complete than those in the United States). Even in these countries, however, supplementary methods must be used for completeness (Lanfant, 1976). When systematic government registry is lacking or very incomplete (as in the United States), other systematic sources might permit creation of a reasonable sampling frame using methods suggested earlier. For example, Meister (1972a) used an annual post office list of postal bank accounts (Strategy 6) to identify most associations in Geneva, Switzerland. However, this source omits smaller groups without such accounts and groups with accounts held in the names of treasurers rather than in the names of the groups. In Birmingham, England, Newton (1975) found his more than 4,000 [Page 275]associations using general and special lists (Strategies 1 and 6). Hatch (1980), studying social and environmental service associations in three towns/cities in England, successfully used methods similar to Strategies 1 and 2.
Societal parameters will affect both the prevalence of volunteer nonprofits and the problem of creating a sampling frame that properly includes them. Most important are freedom of association and assembly. If these are denied, as in totalitarian states, then GAs usually are few or are controlled by the government (blurring sector distinctions). GAs that exist independently tend to be underground and are, hence, very hard to find. In democratic societies with functioning civil liberties, GAs tend to be much more frequent per 1,000 population and easier to study in principle, although they are more resource-consuming to study because of their larger numbers. Freedom of religion and lack of a state church has a similar effect on general civil liberties, as do greater societal decentralization, social heterogeneity, and population size: There is a greater prevalence of GAs, making them easier to study but requiring more resources (Smith, 1973c; Smith and Baldwin, 1983).Conclusion
A comprehensive sampling frame for nonprofits in a community can be created by combining the results of a variety of strategies. It is useful to keep track of which independent sources mention which nonprofits, computing overall percentage estimates of completeness. Special attention is given here to including member benefit nonprofits (vs. only nonmember benefit nonprofits) and volunteer nonprofits or GAs (vs. only paid-staff nonprofits), which often are ignored in spite of their collective importance (Smith, 1997a). Failure to include volunteer-run nonprofits results in underestimating the true number of nonprofits in a territory by at least a factor of 5 times and quite possibly 10 times—a gross underestimate (see Chapter 2). The result sought here is a sampling frame for nonprofits in a community that is more truly representative of the actual population of nonprofits, so that research generalizations based on samples from it can be more valid and reliable. The strategies used can be adapted for larger places, in some cases seeking data on a sampling basis rather than on a comprehensive census basis.
Multiple method strategies for creating a nonprofit sampling frame with special attention to the inclusion of volunteer nonprofits have shown promise when used outside the United States. However, much research effort is involved in creating a good sampling frame, even in societies where there is some registration of associations. Just as those who study paid-staff nonprofits tend to ignore volunteer nonprofits, those studying volunteer nonprofits tend to ignore paid-staff nonprofits in the United States and elsewhere. These two important [Page 276]segments of the nonprofit sector need to be sampled together in a comprehensive fashion if one desires to generalize about nonprofits.
Each of the various strategies noted here has its advantages and disadvantages. Strategy 1, general lists, has the advantage of simplifying one's work if a fairly complete list can be located. However, it might be very incomplete indeed, as is an IRS nonprofit listing for an area (Dale, 1993; Gronbjerg, 1989, 1994). Strategy 2, mass media sources, gives a lot of fine detail but is very time-consuming. It omits smaller and less publicly visible nonprofits. Strategy 3, telephone directories, also is time-consuming but is the easiest way in which to identify religious groups systematically missing from some other sources such as the IRS nonprofit listings. Strategy 4, government lists/data, can be easy but costly to access and tends to be very biased toward wealthier and more established nonprofits. Strategy 5, interviews, is strongly favored by some for its coverage of smaller nonprofit groups and for its potential randomness and generalizability. However, it is expensive and insufficient for studying any given group well because it does not let one speak to many nonprofit leaders directly. Strategy 6 has a haphazard quality to it and does not permit good estimation of what nonprofits are missing. However, if done fairly systematically, it is part of a good comprehensive strategy and can be relatively inexpensive.
I recommend that researchers in the United States use the suggested strategies in the order presented, going as far as resources will permit. I further recommend that research resources be spread over several, and preferably all, of the six strategies noted rather than being concentrated in one or two strategies (as others have done). This permits cross-checking the data from different sources and will yield a better estimate of how good any given source is. Statistically, the greater the overlap of two or more reasonably independent sources of information on existing nonprofits, the better these sources are and the fewer additional nonprofits are likely to be “out there” unnoticed. The less overlap there is, the poorer the sources are and the more nonprofits are likely to be missing from one's composite list.2 More resources are needed to create a reasonable sampling frame in a big city than in a small town, but there are economies of scale in regard to some methods (e.g., long lists might cost about the same to obtain as do short ones) but not others (e.g., use of telephone directories, although sampling them will help limit costs).
Overall, the multistrategy approach seems superior to any single source, if only because multiple sources permit a more reliable estimate of the number of nonprofits missing from one's sampling frame. Multiple strategies also increase one's confidence in the existence of any given nonprofit in one's final composite list if its existence is suggested by two or more independent sources. Generalizations about the nonprofit sector should be based on valid and reasonably representative samples, not heavily biased ones such as IRS listings in the United States. We have gone past the initial stage of research on nonprofits [Page 277]when scholars could be forgiven for their use of convenient but inadequate data such as IRS listings. Higher standards of representativeness and completeness of sampling now must apply.Notes
1. Other categories that often include nonprofits are abortion alternatives, abortion services, adoption services, alcohol information and treatment centers, art instruction and schools, arts organizations and information, athletic organizations, birth control information centers, chambers of commerce, child care centers, clinics, consumer cooperative organizations, cooperative organizations, credit unions, environmental-conservation and ecology organizations, family planning information centers, foundations, hospices, hospitals, humane societies, libraries (can be nonprofits even though they are funded by local government), mental health services, museums, nursing homes, professional organizations, religious organizations, rest homes, retirement homes, retreat facilities, schools (all types), senior citizen service organizations, veterans' and military organizations, youth organizations and centers.
2. In a personal communication, a statistician colleague (Paul Holland) suggested that a rough estimate of the completeness of a sampling frame or composite list (as in making a complete census) can be estimated as the product of the total number of elements in two independently derived lists used to create that frame, all divided by the number of overlapping elements present in both lists. When two such independent lists overlap completely, the composite list from the two sources is estimated as complete. When there is no overlap of such lists, the estimated larger universe of elements is estimated as infinite (dividing by zero) or at least very large. Usually, lists of similar things from a given territory have some overlap, and the estimate of the total universe of elements is finite but larger than one's composite list. By taking the number of elements in one's composite list divided by the estimate of the larger universe from the list overlap, one can compute the current extent of completeness of one's composite list. Two or more independent lists can be combined, and successive approximations of the total universe can be computed using subsequent independent lists/sources. This approach is very useful in creating a local nonprofit sampling frame because it gives a reasonable, if rough, estimate of how well one is doing and when it might be reasonable to stop one's sampling frame work (e.g., stopping with an estimated 80% or 90% completeness). If one is seeking to create a sampling frame or census of a specific type of nonprofit, then one should overlap “purified” lists that are thought by inspection of their names to deal with the purposive type of nonprofit of interest. If a list obtained from somewhere already is “pure” in the sense of containing, say, only health nonprofits or only self-help GAs, then no further purification might be necessary. However, if one obtains a broader list of nonprofits for the territory of concern, then the non-health-related or non-self-help-related groups would have to be deleted to get a purified list, which can then be overlapped with other independent lists of that same type of nonprofit entity. The resulting estimate of the nonprofit universe refers to that purposive type only, not to all nonprofits in the given territory.[Page 278]
Appendix C: Methodology of the Smith One-Suburb Study[Page 279]
The site of this study was a small, middle-class bedroom suburb of Boston with a population between 10,000 and 20,000. The town was chosen because preliminary inquiry suggested that there was a wide variety of both nonmember and member benefit nonprofits present and because of geographical convenience for fieldwork.
The first phase of the fieldwork involved creating a sampling frame of all the nonprofit voluntary groups in town (see Appendix B). This included tactics such as consulting the town clerk for a list of groups; obtaining the list of nonprofit tax-exempt properties in town; asking managers of meeting places in town about groups that met there; talking to church, school, and library leaders about their affiliated groups and other groups that met there; examining the white and yellow pages of local telephone directories; and talking to initial interviewees about groups they knew in town.
As the list of groups lengthened, I made telephone calls to groups that looked as though they might be businesses or parts of the local government, verifying their status. Sometimes, I was misled until a later point of contact. Occasionally, there were duplicates that I had to catch, owing to similar but different names given by different informants for the same group (e.g., Couples Club vs. Mr. and Mrs. Club).
The initial focus of the research was on the differences between public and member benefit groups. Thus, soon after I started on the sampling frame, I began [Page 280]to try to classify the groups as public versus private benefit in nature. I quickly found that I needed a middle category of mixed benefit groups for either uncertainty or verified mixture of aims. I made calls to a number of mixed benefit groups so as to verify proper classification. No attempt was made to call all mixed category groups. Groups also were classified as probable paid staff (at least one hour per week) or probable without paid staff. This low threshold of paid staff status reflects the generally small size and income of local groups. Such a threshold did not turn out to be meaningful in the data analysis, so that I now recommend a threshold of roughly one full-time equivalent in a grassroots association (GA) (see Chapters 1 and 2).
Using the sampling frame as it existed about a week before the start of interviewing, a stratified sample was drawn as follows. A total of 19 groups were randomly selected, if available, from each of the three group type categories (public benefit, mixed, and member benefit), and each set of 19 was further stratified into 12 without paid staff and 7 with some paid staff (at least one hour per week). Because of difficulties in ascertaining accurate classification on initial contact and the desire not to discard interviews once conducted, the final sample of groups looked like Appendix Table C-1. In the category that has only 10 all-volunteer public benefit groups, there were no more in town to sample.Appendix Table C-1 Sampled Groups by Categories (N = 59)
When a group leader was interviewed who indicated facts suggesting that the group belonged in a different category, the group was transferred there, even though this had some negative effect on the stratified random sample. The aim was to obtain a sample that varied in purposive type and, to some extent, in paid-staff presence while being as random as one could make it under the circumstances of time and effort. No attempt is made to weight the sampling categories according to the size of the categories in the total sampling frame. Some disguised examples for the various sampling categories are as follows:
All-volunteer public benefit: Group to help an established nonprofit organization operate Some paid-staff public benefit: Foundation All-volunteer mixed benefit: Parent group helping students in some way (fund-raising) Some paid-staff mixed benefit: Student group that significantly involves both personal and public benefit All-volunteer member benefit: Non-school-based youth sports group Some paid-staff member benefit: Trade union
Interviews were the primary means of data collection—partly qualitative, partly quantitative. There was a slight preponderance of quantitative over [Page 281]open-ended or qualitative questions in the interview schedule, but unplanned qualitative questions that were not in the interview occasionally were pursued. The interviews were made with a sample of 59 GA leaders in town and lasted about an hour (median = 60 minutes). The leaders were the top officials of their respective groups, with the exception of two rather leaderless groups. Sometimes, one of two co-leaders was interviewed, but never both. The leaders were chosen because they were the current official leaders of groups that fell into the GA sample.
A total of 198 nonprofits were identified circa 1991. A nonprofit was identified by me at that time as a group (Smith, 1967) with a nondistribution constraint (Hansmann, 1980), autonomous of government (Salamon, 1992), reasonably autonomous of other groups (Smith, 1994b), and not based mainly on kinship or marriage (Smith, 1991). Legal incorporation, let alone Internal Revenue Service registration as 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4), was unnecessary for inclusion because these are legal/administrative distinctions, not reasonable aspects of analytical social science definition. They are important distinctions but are far too limiting when studying volunteer-managed nonprofits. Semiformal groups (Smith, 1992b), as well as more formal organizations, were allowed into the sample for inclusiveness. This meant that member boundaries did not have to be clear and the leadership structure could be loose, but a unique and “proper” name was required. To be counted in the sampling frame, a nonprofit also had to have a plurality of its members thought to be living in the suburb, according to the leader's estimate.[Page 282]
References[Page 283]1988. The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press..1986. “The Hospice Movement: Institutionalizing Innovation.”International Journal of Health Services16:71–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/RQBV-J2PG-VFNM-1H971989. “Games in Networks: A Sociological Theory of Voluntary Associations.”Rationality and Society1:258–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043463189001002006.1981“Dwarfism and Social Identity: Self-Help Group Participation.”Social Science and Medicine B15:25–30.1986. Drawing Down the Moon..Rev. ed.Boston: Beacon.1994. “Health Psychology: Why Do Some People Get Sick and Some Stay Well?”Annual Review of Psychology45:229–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.001305and .1981. Momentum: A Theory of Social Action. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage..1984. Neighborhoods, People, and Community. New York: Plenum.1992. “Outline of an Organizational Theory of Society.”Protosoziologie3:52–60..1970. “Size and Administrative Component in Occupational Associations.”Pacific Sociological Review13:241–51.and .1990. Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..1979. Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall..1987. “The Social Requisites for Altruism and Voluntarism: Some Notes on What Makes a Sector Independent.”Sociological Theory5:165–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2019371969. Reveille for Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.1995. “The Organizational Transformation of Advocacy: Growth and Development of AIDS Community-Based Organizations.”AIDS and Public Policy Journal10:48–59., , , and .1984. The Nazi Seizure of Power. New York: Franklin Watt.1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.and . [Page 284]1974. “A Critical Examination of Theory and Functions of Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research3:91–99.and .1988. “Christian Base Communities and Grassroots Development.”Journal of Behavioral Economics17:97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720%2888%2990001-0and .1964. “Voluntary Associations in Hyderabad.”Anthropological Quarterly37:175–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/33166501973. “Voluntary Associations in History: From Paleolithic to Present Times.” Pp. 9–28 in Voluntary Action Research: 1973, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1987. “Indigenous Voluntary Associations, Nonprofits, and Development in Africa.” Pp. 416–33 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1990. The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.and .1976. “The Role of Ideologies in Peer Psychotherapy Organizations: Some Theoretical Considerations and Three Case Studies.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science12:323–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886376012003061983. Cults in America. New York: Holt..1966. The Territorial Imperative. New York: Dell.1960. Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey..Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action. 1999. ARNOVA Membership Directory. Indianapolis, IN: ARNOVA.1988. “Sociability and Patterns of Participation: Implications for Social Service Policy.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research17:25–37.and .1991. “Community Context and Complexity of Organizational Structure in Neighborhood Organizations.”Administration and Society22:516–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399791022004061992. “Voluntary Association Boards: A Reflection of Member and Community Characteristics?”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:181–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409202100206and .1975. “Job Finding Club: A Group Assisted Program for Obtaining Employment.”Behavior Research and Therapy13:17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967%2875%2990048-0, , and .1976. “Voluntary Associations, Social Change, and Racial Discrimination: An Analysis of Means and Ends.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research5:65–74.and .1965. “Voluntary Associations and the Integration Hypothesis.”Sociological Inquiry35:149–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1965.tb00598.xand .1960. “Men and Women in Community Agencies: A Note on Power and Prestige.”American Sociological Review25:399–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092087, , and .1987. “Altruismus, Egoismus, und Rationalitat” (Altruism, Egoism, and Rationality in Economics). Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (Suppl. 28): 54–72..1989. “Government Versus Private Provision of Social Services: The Case of Austria.” Pp. 152–76 in The Nonprofit Sector in International Perspective, edited by EstelleJames. New York: Oxford University Press..1993. “Aligning Leadership Needs to the Organizational Stage of Development: Applying Management Theory to Nonprofit Organizations.”Administration in Social Work17:23–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J147v17n01_03and .1974. Radicals in Urban Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1979. Philadelphia Gentlemen: The Making of a National Upper Class. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.. 1995. “The Development of State-Level Nonprofit Databases.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership5:317–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854, , and . [Page 285]1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politicsfor a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.1987. “Participation and Mass Apathy in Associations.” In Studies in Leadership, edited by Alvin W.Gouldner. New York: Garland..1984. The Making of a Moonie. New York: Blackwell..1964. Big School, Small School: High School Size and Student Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.and .1961. Organizational Measurement. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.1991. The Altruism Question. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.1990. “Voluntarism, Nongovernmental Organizations, and Public Policy in the Third Reich.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19:199–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409001900303.1994. “Book Groups: Informal and Innovative Adult Learning.”Journal of Adult Education22:31–41..1988. “Survey Research and Membership in Voluntary Associations.”American Journal of Political Science32:908–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111194and .1956. “Additional Hypotheses in Participation Research.”Rural Sociology21:249–56.1993. “The Structure of Social Protest, 1961–1983.”Social Networks15:171–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733%2893%2990004-5and .1990. Codependents' Guide to the Twelve Steps. New York: Simon & Schuster.1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press..1992. “The Independent Sector in the USSR: Formation, Purposes, and Effects.” Pp. 349–71 in The Nonprofit Sector in the Global Community, edited by Kathleen D.McCarthy, Virginia A.Hodgkinson, Russy D.Sumariwalla, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..1990. “The Growth of the Nonprofit Sector in the 1980s: Facts and Interpretation.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership1:99–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130010203and .1991. “Nonprofit Organizations in the Mixed Economy: A Demand and Supply Analysis.”Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics62:519–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apce.1991.62.issue-4and .1988. “Voluntary Associations in West Africa: A Political Perspective.”Community Development Journal23:74–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/23.2.74and .1986. “The Self-Help Movement Seen in the Context of Social Development.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:77–84.1989. Unfair Competition: The Profits of Nonprofits. New York: Hamilton.and .1994. Unhealthy Charities: Hazardous to Your Health and Wealth. New York: Basic Books.and .1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.and .1997. The Interest Group Society.3rd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.1993. The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution., , and .1985. “Tradition and Japanese Social Organization: Institutional Development in a Tokyo Neighborhood.”Ethnology24:121–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/37735541979. Role Theory. New York: Academic Press.1992. “Funding Uncertainty and Nonprofit Strategies in the 1980s.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership2:381–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130020406.1996. “The Institutionalization of Nonprofit Human Service Delivery: The Role of Political Culture.”Administration & Society28:362–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009539979602800304and .1993a. Organising Public and Voluntary Agencies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul..1993b. “Sector Blurring and Nonprofit Centers: The Case of the United Kingdom.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:241–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764093223006. [Page 286]1994. “Human Service Nonprofits: Towards a Theory of Comparative Advantage.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, San Francisco, October.and .1986. Organising Around Enthusiasms. London: Comedia.and .1976. COINTELPRO: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom. New York: Vintage Books..1994. The Torchbearers: Women and Their Amateur Arts Associations in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.1992. “The Extension of Religious Affiliation: An Explanation of the Growth of Church Participation in the United States.”Social Science Research21:329–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X%2892%2990001-W, , and .1962. Formal Organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.and .1987. “The Academic Discipline of Nonprofit Organization Management.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Denver.1985. “Developmental Stages of Neighborhood Organizations.”Social Policy15:21–28.and .1991. Civil Rights: The I960s Freedom Struggle.Rev. ed. New York: Twayne.1972. “Training Design for Volunteers in Juvenile Court Services.”Volunteer Administration6:42–48.1985. “The Administration of Voluntary Associations: A Course for the 1980s.”Teaching Sociology12:193–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1318327.1994. “Local Feminist Policy Networks in the Contemporary American Interest Group System.”Policy Sciences27:161–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF009998861992. The Ties That Bind: The Nonprofit Sector and the State in Sweden.” Pp. 240–53 in The Nonprofit Sector in the Global Community, edited by K. D.McCarthy, V. A.Hodgkinson, R. D.Sumariwalla, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..1989. “At the Center of the Temple: An Experience of Reliance, or the Tribe Rediscovered.”Societies24:11–13.1991. “Developing Local Leaders: Results of the Structured Learning Experience.”Journal of the Community Development Society22:119–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/155753391094899541983. “Social Support and Efficacy in Advocacy Roles: A Case Study of Two Women's Organizations.”Issues in Mental Health Nursing5:173–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01612848309009439and .1972. “Sex and Social Participation.”American Sociological Review37:183–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094026.1976. “Experiential Knowledge: A New Concept for the Analysis of Self-Help Groups.”Social Services Review50:445–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/643401.1977. Managing Nonprofit Organizations. New York: AMACOM.and .1953. The Organizational Revolution. New York: Harper.1973. Economy of Love and Fear: A Preface to Grants Economics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1994. The Charitable Nonprofits. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , , and .1980. The Backyard Revolution: Understanding the New Citizen Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.1984. Community Is Possible: Repairing America's Roots. New York: Harper Colophon.1969. The Structure of Psychological Weil-Being. Chicago: Aldine.1965. Reports on Happiness. Chicago: Aldine.and .1994. “Toward a Hybrid Model for Effective Organizing in Communities of Color.”Journal of Community Practice1:25–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v01n01_03, , and . [Page 287]1992. “Do Nonprofit Boards Make a Difference? An Exploration of the Relationships Among Board Structure, Process, and Effectiveness.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:227–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409202100304, , and .1993. Inside the Cult. New York: Penguin.and .1960. American Philanthropy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1971. Why Organizers Fail: The Story of a Rent Strike. Berkeley: University of California Press.1990. The United Way. New York: Columbia University Press..1996. “Volunteers in Charity Retailing: Recruitment and Training.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:255–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060305and .1996. “Agents Without Principals: The Economic Convergence of the Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizational Forms.”New York Law School Law Review40:457–536.1974. “‘Maximum Feasible Participation’ (U.S.A.).”Community Development Journal9:17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/220.127.116.112. “Patterns of Social Affiliation as Predictors of Depressive Symptoms Among Urban Blacks.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior33:242–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2137354, , , and .1999. “Assessing the Value of Volunteers.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28:3–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764099281001.1977. “The Diffusion of a Population-Related Innovation: The Planned Parenthood Affiliate.”Social Science Quarterly58:215–28.and .1973. “The Emergence of Voluntary Associations in Massachusetts, 1760–1830.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:64–73.1988. Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.1994. Meeting Need: Successful Charity Marketing. Hempel Hempstead, UK: ICSA Publishing..1990. Fostering Volunteer Programs in the Public Sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1990. “Training in Volunteer Administration: Assessing the Needs of the Field.”Journal of Volunteer Administration9:21–28.and .1977. The Social Economy: People Transforming American Business. New York: John Wiley.1996. “Leadership in Organizations.” Pp. 276–92 in Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by S. R.Clegg, C.Hardy, and W.Nord. London: Sage..1992. “Decision-Making Processes in Community Transport Organisations: A Comparative Case Study of Service Providers.”Voluntas3:71–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01398027, , and .1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.1990. “Canadian Women's Groups in the 1980's: Organizational Development and Policy Influence.”Canadian Public Policy16:17–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3551256.1995. “Lawrence Oxley and Locality Development: Black Self-Help in North Carolina, 1925–1928.”Journal of Community Practice2:49–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v02n04_04.1992. “Survival of the Nonprofit Spirit in a For-Profit World.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:391–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409202100406.1945. “Social Organization in a Small City.”American Journal of Sociology51:217–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1945.51.issue-31990. Managing Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations. London: Routledge.and . [Page 288]1997. “Measurement Outcomes of Local Mobilizations.”Current Sociology45:121–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001139297045003007and .1957. “Organizational Size.”Administrative Science Quarterly1:484–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2390870.1964. Principles of Organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich..1969. Oneida: Utopian Community to Modern Corporation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.1975. The Angry Brigade. London: Gollancz..1974. Direct Action and Liberal Democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks..1997. Boards That Make a Difference: A New Design for Leadership in Nonprofit and Public Organizations.2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1993. “Intrapersonal Resources and the Effectiveness of Self-Help Groups for Bereaved Older Adults.”The Gerontologist33:619–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/33.5.619and .1976. “A Note on the Prevalence of Voluntary Associations in Two Norwegian Provinces.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research5:155–59.1999. Flying Under the Radar: The Significant Work of All-Volunteer Organizations. San Francisco: Support Center for Nonprofit Management/NDC.and .1956. “The Formalization Process in Voluntary Associations.”Social Forces34:342–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2573667and .1993. Service Clubs in American Society: Rotary, Kiwanis, and Lions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.1992. The American Peace Movement. New York: Twayne.1991. “Mobilizing Consumer Activism in Health Care: The Role of Self-Help Groups.”Research in Social Movements Conflicts and Change13:275–305.1990. “Israeli and U.S. Orientations Toward Self-Help Groups for Families in Crisis.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19:251–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409001900306, , and .1999. “The Benefits and Costs of Volunteering in Community Organizations: Review and Practical Implications.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28:46–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764099281004and .1994. Collaborative Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .1980–81. “Using ‘Outside Resource People’ in Community-Based Organizations.”Journal of Alternative Human Services6:15–19..1983. “Special Roles of Mental Health Professionals in Self-Help Group Development.”Prevention in Human Services2:65–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J293v02n03_05.1937. The Small Sects in America.Rev. ed. New York: Abingdon Press.1991. Democratizing Development: The Role of Voluntary Organizations. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press..1961. “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly6:129–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2390752and .1987“Social Support as a Unifying Concept in Voluntary Action.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research16:58–68.1989. Constructing Brotherhood: Class, Gender, and Fraternalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.1991. “Neighborhood-Representing Organizations: How Democratic Are They?”Social Service Review65:614–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/6038781996. “Defining Who Is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly25:364–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764096253006, , and .1996. “The Experience of Moral Community in a Rural Community Context.”Journal of Community Psychology24:108–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6629%28199604%2924:2%3C108::AID-JCOP3%3E3.0.CO;2-Vand . [Page 289]1992. Civil Society in Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.1981. “Voluntary Associations as Resources for Neighborhood Problem-Solving.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research10:40–48.and .1988. Business and Politics: A Study of Collective Action. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs. 1975. Giving in America: Toward a Stronger Voluntary Sector. Washington, DC: CPPPN.1988. The Nonprofit Organization Handbook.2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.1983. The Effective Voluntary Board of Directors.and .Rev. ed. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.1991. Political Participation in the United Slates.2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.1985. “Rural Leadership Programs and Changing Participation of Men and Women in Public Affairs.”Journal of the Community Development Society16:41–56., , and .1984. “Participation in Public Interest Groups: Membership Motivations.”American Politics Quarterly12:409–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X84012004021973. “Networks and Exchange: The Role of Social Relationships in a Small Voluntary Association.”Journal of Anthropological Research29:96–112..1980. “Default and the Tanda: A Model Regarding Recruitment for Rotating Credit Associations.”Ethnology19:213–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3773272and .1989. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.and .1965. Reclaiming the American Dream. New York: Vintage Books..1985–86. “Campaign Organizations, Social Technology, and Apolitical Participation.”New Political Science14:141–55..1998. “A Model and Typology of Government-NGO Relationships.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly27:358–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764098273006.1993. “Response of Community Organizations to the Civil Unrest in Los Angeles.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:357–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764093224007, , and .1992. Juvenile Gangs. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas., , and .1994. Storefront Revolution: Food Co-ops and the Counterculture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press..1997. “Nonprofit Incorporation Among Movements of the Poor: Pathways and Consequences for Homeless Social Movement Organizations.”Sociological Quarterly38:343–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tsq.1997.38.issue-21997. “Competition and Commitment in Voluntary Memberships: The Paradox of Persistence and Participation.”Sociological Perspectives40:61–79., , and .Academic Centers and Programs Focusing on the Study of Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Not-for-Profit Activities.and . n. d.3rd ed.Washington, DC: Independent Sector.1992. “The Impact of a Self-Help Group on Nurses and Their Dying Patients.” Pp. 97–104 in Self-Help: Concepts and Applications, edited by Alfred H.Katz, Hannah L.Hedrick, Daryl H.Isenberg, and Associates. Philadelphia: Charles Press.1971. “Voluntary Association Joining: A Cross-National Comparative Note.”American Sociological Review36:872–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2093673[Page 290]1989. “On Lipset's Measurement of Voluntary Association Affiliation Differences Between Canada and the United States.”Canadian Journal of Sociology14:383–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3340613, , , and .1992. “Voluntary Association Membership in Fifteen Countries: A Comparative Analysis.”American Sociological Review57:139–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096201, , and .1987. “The Retreat of Folly: Some Modest Replications of Inner-City Success.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science494:71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027162874940010071980. “Toward an Appropriate Typology for the Study of the Participation of Older Persons in Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research9:9–19.1981–82. “Voluntary Association Participation and Life Satisfaction: Replication, Revision, and Extension.”International Journal of Aging and Human Development14:127–37.1976. “Membership in Different Types of Voluntary Associations and Psychological Well-Being.”The Gerontologist16:335–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/16.4.3351993. “On Estimating the Size of the Non-Profit Sector in the U.S. Economy.”Voluntas4:183–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF013984281988. Invisible Careers: Women Civic Leaders From the Volunteer World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1983. “Group Influence in American County Politics.”Local Government Studies9:67–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/030039383084330721965. Secret Societies. London: Tandem Books..1979. “Development of a Bereaved Parents Group.” Pp. 80–94 in Self-Help Groups for Coping With Crisis, edited by M.Lieberman, L.Borman, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1966. Neighborhood Groups and Urban Renewal. New York: Columbia University Press.1989. The General Social Survey, 1972–1989: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.and .1961. Great Books and Small Groups. New York: Free Press.1993. Volunteering in Europe. London: Volunteer Centre..1976. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.1991. “The Voluntary Sector in ‘the Information Society’: A Study in Division and Uncertainty.”Voluntas2:69–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01398671and .1980. At Odds: Women and the Family in America From the Revolution to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press..1957. Grassroots Private Welfare. New York: New York University Press..1986. Organizing the Movement: The Roots and Growth of ACORN. Philadelphia: Temple University Press..1974. “Training Student Volunteers.”Personnel and Guidance Journal53:57–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1974.tb04132.x, , , and .1945. Democracy in America. 2 vols. New York: Knopf.. 1975. “Associational Politics and Internal Democracy.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research4:90–97.and .1960. “Springdale and Its People.”Journal of Social Issues16 (4): 7–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1960.tb00408.x1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review82:147–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101and .1990. “The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors.”Annual Review of Sociology16:137–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001033and .1974. The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats. New York: Harper & Row.1983. Who Rules America Now?New York: Simon & Schuster.[Page 291]1987. “Political Theories of Nonprofit Organizations.” Pp. 43–54 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..1972. “Voluntary Associational Structure in Malaysia: Some Implications for Political Participation.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:24–37.1985. “Goods, Time, and Weil-Being: The Joint Dependence Problem.” Pp. 1–18 in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. T.Juster and F. P.Stafford. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.and .1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4960-31972. “Social Class and Organizational Dynamics: A Study of Voluntary Associations in a Colombian City.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1 (3): 46–52.1986. “The Social Support Function in Epilepsy Self-Help Groups.”Small Group Behavior17:139–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700202, , and .1990. Managing the Non-Profit Organization. New York: HarperCollins.1982. “Citizen Participation in Crime Prevention.”Human Organization41:307–14.and .1988. Handbook of Personal Relationships. Chichester, UK: Wiley.1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press..1965. Resistance: France, 1940–1945. Boston: Little, Brown..1978. “Voluntary Associations at Different Territorial Levels.” Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Uppsala, Sweden, August..1992. “Active Members in Nuclear Repository Issues Organizations: A Demographic Research Note.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764092021001081990. By the People: A History of Americans as Volunteers.and .Rev. ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1989. “Group Demographics in the Mental Health Patient Movement: Group Location, Age, and Size as Structural Factors.”Community Mental Health Journal25:211–30Q. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF007556761991. “The Politics of Psychiatric Self-Help: Political Factions, Interactional Support, and Group Longevity in a Social Movement.”Social Science and Medicine32:1121–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536%2891%2990088-T1993. “Alcoholics Anonymous: What Is Currently Known?” Pp. 41–76 in Research on A Icoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives, edited by B. S.McCrady and W. R.Miller. New Brunswick, NJ: Center on Alcohol Studies., , , .1973. “A Nation of Volunteers: Participatory Democracy or Administrative Manipulation?”Berkeley Journal of Sociology74:159–81.1984. Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Local Development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.and .1981. Unions..3rd ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.1961. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York: Free Press..1972. “The Untapped Potential of the Third Sector.”Business and Society Review1:39–44..1993. The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown..1976. “Profit in Not-for-Profit Corporations: The Example of Health Care.”Political Science Quarterly91:433–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2148935and .1995. “Part of the Welfare Mix: The Third Sector as an Intermediate Area.”Voluntas6:159–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02353995.Executive Office of the President and Office of Management and the Budget. 1987. Standard Industrial Classification Manual. Washington, DC: Office of Management and the Budget.1987. “Neighborhood Education, Mobilization, and Organization for Juvenile Crime Prevention.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science494:54–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716287494001006. [Page 292]Famighetti, Robert, ed. 1997. World Almanac and Book of Facts, 1997. Mahwah, NJ: World Almanac Publishers.1994. The Coup: Tactics in the Seizure of Power. Westport, CT: Praeger.1980. “A Comparison of Leadership and Situational Characteristics Within Profit and Nonprofit Organizations.”Proceedings of the Academy of Management5:334–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.1980.4977898, , and .1994. International Organizations., , and .3rd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger.1937. Fifty Million Brothers: A Panorama of American Lodges and Clubs. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.1991. “Structural Bases of Leadership in Intraorganizational Networks.”Social Psychology Quarterly54:36–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27867871995. Controversy and Coalition: The New Feminist Movement.and .Rev. ed.New York: Twayne.1993. “The Double-Edged Sword of Social Service Contracting: Public Accountability Versus Nonprofit Autonomy.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership3:363–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.41300304041996. “Secrecy, Trust, and Dangerous Leisure: Generating Group Cohesion in Voluntary Organizations.”Social Psychology Quarterly59:22–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2787117and .1994. The Churching of America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.and .1984. The Radical Vision of Saul Alinsky. New York: Paulist Press.1995. “A Survey of Grassroots Advocacy Organizations for Nursing Home Residents.”Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect!15–91..1982. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1993. Leadership and Management of Volunteer Programs: A Guide for Volunteer Administrators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .1984. “Development From Below: Neighborhood Improvement Associations in the Latin American Squatter Settlements.”Studies in Comparative International Development19:61–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02686504.1993. The Road From Rio: Sustainable Development and the Nongovernmental Movement in the Third World. Westport, CT: Praeger..1998. Nongovernments: NGOs and the Political Development of the Third World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press..1994. Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America..Rev. ed.New York: Twayne.1973. “The Elks: An American Ideology.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:135–47.1984. The Successful Volunteer Organization. Chicago: Contemporary Books..1985. “The Limitations of Management and the Decline of Friendly Societies in Trinidad and Tobago.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research14:30–44.1976. Resistance. London: Methuen.1985. “Seasonal Dimensions of Rural Social Organization.”Journal of Development Studies21:377–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388508421949.1989. Local Organizations for Social Development. Denver, CO: Westview.1975. The Politics of Women's Liberation. New York: David McKay..1984. “Citizen Action for Environmental Health: Report on a Survey of Community Organizations.”American Journal of Public Health74:444–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.74.5.444.1991. “Not in Our Backyards: The Grassroots Environmental Movement.”Society and Natural Resources4:235–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941929109380757and . [Page 293]1988. “Local Action on Behalf of Local Collectives in the U.S. and Israel: How Different Are Leaders From Members in Voluntary Associations?”Journal of Voluntary Action Research17:36–54., , , and .1985. “A Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Organizational Structure and Context of Voluntary Leisure Service Organizations.”Society and Leisure8:605–13..1974. “Voluntary Participation: The Canadian Perspective.” Pp. 253–76 in Voluntary Action Research: 1974, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.and .1978. “Innerbetriebliche Arbeitssituation und Teilnahme an Freiwilligen Vereinigungen” (Work Experience and Participation in Voluntary Associations). Zeitschrift fiir Soziologie7:56–71..1969. “Two Principles of Human Associations.” Pp. 45–57 in Voluntary Associations, edited by J. R.Pennock and J. W.Chapman. New York: Atherton.1990. The Strategy of Social Protest.2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1984. Beyond Preference: Liberal Theories of Independent Association. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1978. “The Social Functions of Caste Associations and the Possibility of Their Transformation Into Voluntary Associations.” Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Uppsala, Sweden, August.1986. “Health Education and Community Participation in Mass Drug Administration for Malaria in Nicaragua.”Social Science and Medicine22:869–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536%2886%2990241-8and .1984. The Self-Help Revolution. New York: Human Sciences Press.and .1993. Free Ride: The Tax Exempt Economy. Kansas City, MO: Andrews and McMeel.and .1978. Doing Good: The Limits of Benevolence. New York: Pantheon Books., , , .1992. Nazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.and .1970. People, Power, Change: Movements of Social Transformation. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.and .1992. Government and the Third Sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , and .1980. The Limits to Citizen Participation: The Decline of Community Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage..1983. “The Consequences of Mandating Citizen Participation.”Policy Studies Review3:90–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00077.x.1980. “Changing Women's Roles in Political Volunteerism and Reform of the City.”Signs5 (Suppl.): 67–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495711and .1990. “The Independence of Voluntary Organizations in a Social Democracy: Governmental Influences in Norway.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19:393–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409001900408.1994. The United Way Scandal: An Insider's Account of What Went Wrong and Why. New York: John Wiley.1971. “Woman and Volunteerism.” Pp. 533–54 in Woman in Sexist Society, edited by VivianGornick and Barbara K.Moran. New York: Basic Books.1979. Opposition to Volunteerism: An Annotated Bibliography. Chicago: Council of Planning Librarians Bibliographies.[Page 294]1987. “Organizaciones Empresariales Rurales: Los Casos de Brasíl y de Chile” (Rural Employers' Organizations in Brazil and Chile). Revista Paraguaya de Sociologia24:17–32..1991. “The Role of Alzheimer's Support Groups in Families' Utilization of Community Services.”Journal of Gerontological Social Work16:43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J083v16n03_05and .1960. “Formal Organizations and Informal Activities.”Journal of Social Issues16 (4): 16–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1960.tb00409.xand .1985. Emergency Squad Volunteers: Professionalism in Unpaid Work. New York: Praeger.and .1959. “Typology of Voluntary Associations.”American Sociological Review24:22–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2089579and .1992. “Voluntary Associations Activity in English Canada, French Canada, and the United States: A Multivariate Analysis.”Canadian Journal of Sociology17:371–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3341215and .1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1975. “Differential Effects of Temporal Constraints on Organizational Participation.”Pacific Sociological Review18:327–41.1993. Reinventing Civil Society. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, Health and Welfare Unit.1992. Who Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy. New York: Simon & Schuster..1981. “Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Lay Groups on Weight Reduction.”British Medical Journal283:1093–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.283.6299.1093, , and .1990. “The Role of Voluntary Social Welfare Organizations in Norway: A Democratic Alternative to a Bureaucratic Welfare State?”Voluntas1:62–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01398492and .1989. “Developing a Universe of Nonprofit Organizations: Methodological Considerations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764089018001061993. Understanding Nonprofit Funding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1994. “Using NTEE to Classify Non-Profit Organisations: An Assessment of Human Service and Regional Applications.”Voluntas5:301–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF023540381985. The Chicago Nonprofit Sector in a Time of Government Retrenchment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute., , and .1998. “Mapping Small Religious Nonprofit Organizations: An Illinois Profile.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly27:13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764098271002and .1986. “Les Acteurs des Luttes Urbaines” (Actors in Urban Conflicts). Schweiz-erische Zeitschrift fiir Soziologie12:485–94..1980. “The Help Recipient's Perspective.” Pp. 355–69 in Participation in Social and Political Activities, edited by David H.Smith, J.Macaulay, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , and .1988. “The Hospice in Transition: Organizational and Administrative Perspectives.”Administration in Social Work12:31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J147v12n02_04.1963. Symbolic Crusade. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.1980. Theories of Organizations. New York: John Wiley..1984. “Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights, 1957–1970.”Social Problems32:31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1984.32.issue-11996. “Big Fights: Competition Between Poor People's Social Movement Organizations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly25:53–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764096251005and .1995. Poor People's Social Movement Organizations: The Goal Is to Win. Westport, CT: Praeger.[Page 295]1987a. “Abandoning the Rhetoric of Independence: Reflections on the Nonprofit Sector in the Post-Liberal fan.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research16:11–28.1987b. “A Historical Overview of the Private Nonprofit Sector.” Pp. 3–26 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1990. “Conflicting Managerial Cultures in Nonprofit Organizations.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership1:153–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.41300102061992. Inventing the Nonprofit Sector and Other Essays on Philanthropy, Volunteerism, and Nonprofit Organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.1999. “The Work of Many Hands: A Response to Stanley N. Katz on the Origins of the ‘Serious Study’ of Philanthropy.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28:522–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08997640992840131972. Organizations: Structures and Processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.1996. Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes.6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.1974. “Formal Voluntary Associations in Norway.” Pp. 213–27 in Voluntary Action Research: 1974, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1979. “Indicators of Democracy in Professional Associations: Elite Recruitment, Turnover, and Decision Making in a Metropolitan Bar Association.”American Bar Foundation Research Journal4:699–767.and .1980. An Exploratory Study of Therapeutic Self-Help Child Abuse Groups. D.S.W. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Social Welfare.1993. American Skinheads. Westport, CT: Praeger.Hammack, David C. and Dennis R.Young, eds. 1993. Nonprofit Organizations in a Market Economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1951. The Uprooted. New York: Grosset and Dunlop..1988. Understanding Voluntary Organisations. London: Penguin.1981. “Youth, Voluntary Associations, and Socialization.”Social Forces60:211–23.1978. “Adult Voluntary Associations and Adolescent Socialization.”Sociological Quarterly19:481–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1978.tb01191.xand .1977. “The Population Ecology of Organizations.”American Journal of Sociology82:929–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226424and .1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.and .1980. “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise.”Yale Law Journal89:835–901. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/796089.1987. “Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organization.” Pp. 27–42 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..1977. The Limits of Altruism: An Ecologist's View of Survival. Bloomington: Indiana University Press..1991. “The Political Mobilization of the North African Immigrant Community in France.”Ethnic and Racial Studies14:350–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1991.99937161984. “The Citizens Coalition in Milwaukee.”Social Policy15:27–31.1998a. “Doing It Their Way: Organizational Challenges for Voluntary Associations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly27:144–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764098272003.1998b. Organizing God's Work. New York: St. Martin's. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230375987.1960. “Weber's Categories of Authority and Voluntary Associations.”American Sociological Review25:231–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20926281991. Nudist Society., , and .Rev. ed.Los Angeles: Elysium Growth Press.1911. “A Study of Voluntary Associations, Educational and Social, in Europe During the Period From 1100 to 1700.”Journal of Genetic Psychology18:10–30.[Page 296]1980. Outside the State: Voluntary Organisations in Three English Towns. London: Croom Helm..1979. “The Relative Costs of Services Provided by Voluntary and Statutory Organisations.”Public Administration41:397–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/padm.1979.57.issue-4and .1986. “How (Some) Community Organizations Adapt to Fiscal Strain.”Research in Urban Policy2:117–25., , and .1965. The Secret Societies of All Ages and Countries. 2 vols. New Hyde Park, NY: University Books.1992. “The Revival of the Nonprofit Sector in Hungary.” Pp. 309–22 in The Nonprofit Sector in the Global Community, edited by Kathleen D.McCarthy, Virginia A.Hodgkinson, Russy D.Sumariwalla, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..1981. “Federations of Community Groups: The Benefits and Dangers.”Community Development Journal16:98–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/16.2.98and .1990. Practical Sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.1994. The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and Associates.1991. Executive Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .Herman, Robert D. and JonVan Til, eds. 1989. Nonprofit Boards of Directors: Analyses and Applications. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.1991. “Judgments of Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Chicago, October., , and .1959. The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley., , and .1992. “Age and Gender Differences in the Value of Productive Activities: Four Different Approaches.”Research on Aging14:169–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027592142002and .1985. “PatternsofTimeUse.” Pp. 133–76 in77me, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. T.Juster and F. P.Stafford. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.1986. The Economic Analysis of Unions. Boston: Allyn & Unwin.and .1986. “The Creation of Political Solidarity in Social Movement Organizations.”Sociological Quarterly27:373–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00267.x1994. Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.1968. “Social Participation and Social Status.”American Sociological Review33:722–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092883and .1995. Giving and Volunteering in the United States, Vol. 2: Trends in Giving and Volunteering by Type of Charity. Washington, DC: Independent Sector., , , .1991. “A New Research and Planning Tool for Managers: The National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities.”Nonprofit Management & Leadership1:403–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130010410and .1984. Dimensions of the Independent Sector: A Statistical Profile.and .1st ed. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.1992. Giving and Volunteering in the United States: 1992 Edition. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.and [Page 297]1996a. Giving and Volunteering in the United States: 1996 Edition. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.and .1996b. Nonprofit Almanac, 1996–1997. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .1989. From Belief to Commitment: The Activities and Finances of Religious Congregations in the United States. Washington, DC: Independent Sector., , and .1992. Nonprofit Almanac, 1992–1993. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , , and .1988. “The Effectiveness of Non-Profit Organizations.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science12:202–21.1975. Elmtown 's Youth and Elmtown Revisited. New York: John Wiley.1991. “Overt Funding, Buried Goals, and Moral Turnover: The Organizational Transformation of Radical Experiments.”Human Relations44:643–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679104400701and .1988. “Ressourcenzusammensetzung und Oligarchisierung freiwilliger Vereinigungungen” (Resource Structure and Oligarchic Tendencies in Voluntary Associations). Kblner Zeitschriftfiir Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie40:527–50.1994. “Does Government Financing Have a Detrimental Effect on the Autonomy of Voluntary Associations? Evidence From German Sport Clubs.”International Review for the Sociology of Sport29:269–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1012690294029003031972. Three Worlds of Development.2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.1979. “Beyond Democracy: Interest Groups and the Patriotic Core.”Humanist39:4–10.1979. “Toward a Participation-Based Typology of Voluntary Organizations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research8:84–92.1989. Governing Boards: Their Nature and Nurture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1997. The Board Member's Guide to Strategic Planning: A Practical Approach to Strengthening Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..1987. Development of Rural Leadership. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation., , and .1997) Interest Group Politics in America.(3rd ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.1974. “Diffusion in an Urban Hierarchy: The Case of Rotary Clubs.”Economic Geography50:333–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/143060and .1988. “Organized Groups, Land Use Decisions, and Ecological Theory.”Sociological Perspectives31:122–41.1955. Homo Ludens. Boston: Beacon..1997. “Individual and Social Benefits of Mutual Aid Self-Help Groups.”Social Policy27:12–19..1995.5m, Organized Charity, and the Poor Law in Victorian England. New York: St. Martin's. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/97802303754371993. “National Federations: The Role of Voluntary Organizations in Linking Macro and Micro Orders in Civil Society.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:121–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409302200203.1986. “Communities Do Act: Neighborhood Characteristics, Resource Mobilization, and Political Action by Local Community Organizations.”Social Science Journal23:169–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319%2886%2990033-9and .1973. India's Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1990. “Realigning Corporate Giving: Problems in the Nonprofit Sector for Community Development Corporations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19:111–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409001900203, , and .1992. Decisions Without Hierarchy: Feminist Interventions in Organization Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.[Page 298]1996. “Changes in Local Voluntary Associations in Denmark.”Voluntas7:160–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02354110.1974. Becoming Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.and .Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management. 1995. California Nonprofit Organizations, 1995. San Francisco: University of San Francisco, Institute for Nonprofit Management.1992–93. “A Community Organizing Case Study: An Analysis of CAP-IT's Strategy to Prevent the Location of a Toxic Waste Incinerator in Their Community.”International Quarterly of Community Health Education13:253–63..1963. “Instrumental and Expressive Voluntary Associations.”Sociology and Social Research47:461–71.and .1984. Sampling in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Longman.1989. The Nonprofit Sector in International Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press..Jaszczak, Sandra and TaraSheets, eds. 1997. Encyclopedia of Associations.32nd ed. Detroit, MI: Gale Research International.1992. “When the Management Is the Message: Relating Values to Management Practice in Nonprofit Organizations.”Nonprofit Management & Leadership2:403–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.41300204071994. “Ethics in Nonprofit Management: Creating a Culture of Integrity.” Pp. 184–207 in The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, edited by RobertHerman and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1977. “Radical Transformation of Organizational Goals.”Administrative Science Quarterly22:568–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392401.1986. “Channeling Black Insurgency: Elite Patronage and Professional Social Movement Organizations in the Development of the Black Movement.”American Sociological Review51:812–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095369and .1995. “The Emergence of Nonprofit Organizations in Romania and the Role of International NGOs.”Social Development Issues17:38–56., , and .1990. “Unraveling in Democratically Governed Groups.”Rationality and Society2:4–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10434631900020010021992. Religion in Society: A Sociology of Religion.4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.1978. “Fraternal Associations and Civil Religion: Scottish Rite Freemasonry.”Review of Religious Research20:3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3509938and .1960. The Charities of London, 1480–1660: The Aspirations and Achievements of the Urban Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.1985. “Conceptual and Methodological Issues Involved in the Measurement of Time Use.” Pp. 19–31 in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. T.Juster and F. P.Stafford. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.1988. Cults That Kill: Probing the Underworld of Occult Crime. New York: Warner Books..1985. “Self-Help Groups as a Crucible for People Empowerment in the Context of Social Development.”Social Development Issues9:4–13.and .1991. “Self-Help Groups Providing Services: Conflict and Change.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly20:191–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409102000206.1972. Commitment and Community: Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1973. “Evaluating Alternatives and Alternative Valuing.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science9:381–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188637300900219and [Page 299]1986. “Cooperation and Coalition Development Among Neighborhood Organizations: A Case Study.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:23–34..1981. The Decline of American Pluralism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press..1995. The Right to Bear Arms: The Rise of America's New Militias. New York: HarperCollins..1961. Parents of the Handicapped. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.1993. Self-Help in America: A Social Movement Perspective. New York: Twayne.1976. The Strength in Us: Self-Help Groups in the Modern World. New York: New Viewpoints/Franklin Watts.and .1994. “The Artistry of Leadership: An Exploration of the Leadership Process in Voluntary Not-for-Profit Organizations.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership4:285–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130040304.1974. “Voluntary Associations in Switzerland.” Pp. 231–50 in Voluntary Action Research: 1974, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1996) Leisure. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.(1995. “A Loose and Baggy Monster.” Pp. 66–95 in An Introduction to the Voluntary Sector, edited by J.Davis-Smith, C.Rochester, and R.Hedley. London: Routledge.and .1994. “Understanding Worldview Transformation in Mutual Help Groups.”Prevention in Human Services11:181–98.and .1994. Extraordinary Groups.and .5th ed. New York: St. Martin's.1972. “An Inductive Examination of Voluntary Association Functions in a Single-Enterprise-Based Community.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1 (2): 43–51.1992. “Institutionally Specific Design Archetypes: A Framework for Understanding Change in National Sport Organizations.”International Review for the Sociology of Sport27:343–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/101269029202700405, , and .1990. “Professional Associations and the Free Rider Problem: The Case of Optometry.”Public Choice65:181–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00123798and .1990. Revolution: A Sociological Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.1956. Social Movements in the United States. New York: Random House..1992. “The Provision of Benefits by Interest Groups in the United States.”Journal of Politics54:394–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2132032and .1989. “Introduction: Leadership and Decision-Making.”International Social Movement Research2:215–24..1995. “On the Malfunction of the Generic Approach in Small Voluntary Associations.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership5:275–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.41300503061996. “The Third Sector in Scandinavia.”Voluntas7:99–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02354107and .1994. “Volunteer Activism and Professionalism in Social Movement Organizations.”Social Problems41:257–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1994.41.2.03x0437u.1996. Voluntary Associations in the Graeco-Roman World. New York: Routledge.and .1991. Profiles of Excellence: Achieving Success in the Nonprofit Sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , and .1984. The Brotherhood: The Secret World of the Freemasons. London: Dorset..1982. “Political Mobilization by Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Political and Military Sociology10:171–82..1986. “Associations and Interest Groups.”Annual Review of Sociology12:1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000245.1988. “Incentive in Collective Action Organizations.”American Sociological Review53:311–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095641. [Page 300]1989. “Resource Acquisition and Allocation in U.S. National Associations.”International Social Movement Research2:129–54..1990a. “Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction.”Social Forces68:1041–63..1990b. Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economies of Associations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter..1987. “The Incentive Systems of Associations.”Research in the Sociology of Organizations5:285–309.and .1984. “What Relevance Do Organization Theories Have for Voluntary Organizations?”Social Science Quarterly65:3–20.and .1981. Organized for Action: Commitment in Voluntary Associations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.and .1973. “Motivation in Volunteerism: Synopsis of a Theory.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1 (2): 27–29..1984. “Voluntary Associations in Neuquen, Argentina.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research13:38–54..1986. “Mexican Voluntary Associations: A Community Study.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:46–64..1985. “The Impact of Citizen Participation on Hazardous Waste Policy Implementation: The Case of Clermont County, Ohio.”Policy Studies Journal14:52–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1985.tb00203.xand .1979. “Voluntary Agencies in Four Welfare States.”Administration in Socia Work3:397–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J147v03n04_021984. Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. Berkeley: University of California Press.1987. “Voluntary Agencies and the Personal Social Services.” Pp. 240–57 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1993. Privatization in Four European Countries. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe., , , and .1996. Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Kraybill, D. and P.Pellman-Good, eds. 1992. The Perils of Professionalization. Scottsdale, AZ: Herald Press.1977. “Mobilizing Voluntary Associations Into a Social Movement: The Case of Environmental Quality.”Sociological Quarterly18:267–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1977.tb01412.x1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1995. “Social Support During the Process of Divorce: It Does Make a Difference.”Journal of Divorce and Remarrriage24:111–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v24n03_07and .1990. “The Self-Help Movement: Review of the Past Decade of Research.”Social Work With Groups13:101–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J009v13n03_111998. “Letter to David Horton Smith.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly27. 90–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764098271007.1971. “Political Knowledge of College Activist Groups: SDS, YAF, and YD.”Journal of Politics33:840–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21282851975. Political Power in Poor Neighborhoods. New York: John Wiley..1891. Two Thousand Years of Gild Life. Hull, UK: A. Brown.1992. Medieval Heresy: Popular Movements From the Gregorian Reform to the Reformation..2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.1979. Confront or Concede: The Alinsky Citizen Action Organizations. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.. [Page 301]1972a. “‘Maximum Feasible Participation’: Working Class and Peasant Movements as a Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Current U.S. Movements of Poor and Minority Groups.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1 (3): 25–41..1972b. “Trade Unions, Peasant Movements, and Social Movements as Voluntary Action.” Pp. 135–58 in Voluntary Action Research: 1972, edited by David H.Smith, Richard D.Reddy, and BurtBaldwin. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books..1976. “Voluntary Associations in France.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research5:192–207..1994. The Quickening of America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .1992. “The Politics of Prostitution Control: Interest Group Politics in Four Canadian Cities.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16:169–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00167.x.1965. “An Integrative Analysis of Voluntary Associational Leadership and Reputational Influences.”Sociological Inquiry35:176–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soin.1965.35.issue-2and .1994. Hell's Angels. New York: Carol..1994. Self-Help and Mutual Aid Groups: International and Multicultural Perspectives. New York: Haworth., , and .1983. “Origins and Evolution of a Social Movement Strategy: The Rent Strike in New York City, 1904–1980.”Urban Affairs Quarterly18:371–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042081683018003061986. “Privatization and Voluntarization.”Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs2:285–320..1993. Managing Across Sectors: Similarities and Differences Between For-Profit and Voluntary Non-Profit Organisations. London: City University Business School..1986. “Why Organizations Turn Nonprofit: Lessons From Case Studies.” Pp. 196–204 in The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions, edited by SusanRose-Ackerman. New York: Oxford University Press.and .1986. Privatisation and the Welfare State. London: Allen & Unwin.and .1996. “Group Membership and the Mobilization of Political Participation.”Journal of Politics58:447–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960234.1995. Human Societies., , and .7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.1970. A Social History of the Helping Services. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.and .1973. The Third Sector: New Tactics for a Responsive Society. New York: AMACOM..1994. “Problems in Assessing Prevalence and Membership Characteristics of Self-Help Group Participants.” Pp. 32–49 in Understanding the Self-Help Organization, edited by T. J.Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.and .1986. “The Impact of Self-Help Groups on the Mental Health of Widows and Widowers.”American Journal of Orthopsychiatry56:435–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1986.tb03475.xand .1992. “Volunteering and Empowerment in Secondary Schools.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:19–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409202100103and .1986. Social Support, Life Events, and Depression. New York: Academic Press., , and .1977. “The Urban Distribution of Voluntary Organizations.”Social Science Quarterly58:472–80.1987. “The Informal-Intermittent Organization: A Vehicle for Successful Citizen Protest.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science23:397–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886387023003081945. The Cultural Background of Personality. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.. [Page 302]1956. Union Democracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press., , and .1965. The Berkeley Student Revolt. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.and .1972. The Politics of Altruism: A Study of the Political Behavior of Voluntary Development Agencies. Geneva, Switzerland: Lutheran World Federation..1965. West African Urbanization: A Study of Voluntary Associations in Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press..1961. “Voluntary Associations and Neighborhood Cohesion.”American Sociological Review26:258–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2089863.1996. Social Movement Organizations: A Guide to Insurgent Realities. New York: Aldine de Gruyter..1984. “Social Movement Locals: Modal Member Structures.”Sociological Analysis45:115–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3710744and .1990. “Neighborhood Associations: Their Issues, Their Allies, and Their Opponents.”Urban Affairs Quarterly26:68–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004208169002600104and .1989. “And Lettuce Is Non-Animal: Toward a Positive Economics of Voluntary Action.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:367–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764089018004071992. The Commons: New Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1996. Our Evolving Universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.1986. “The Community Resources Project and the Training of Activists.”Community Development Journal21:259–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/21.4.259, , and .1983. “Citizen Groups in Broadcast Regulatory Policy-Making.”Policy Studies Journal12:258–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psj.1983.12.issue-2, , and .1976. “Volunteer Fire Departments and Community Mobilization.”Human Organization35:345–54.1965. The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press..1984. “Local Voluntarism in New Hampshire: Who, Why, and at What Benefit?”Journal of the Community Development Society15:17–30., , , , .1934. Leisure: A Suburban Study. New York: Columbia University Press., , and .1989. The Resistance in Austria, 1938–1945. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.1929. Middletown. New York: Harcourt Brace.and .1991. The 1991 National Survey of Voluntary Activity in the UK. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.and .1988. Satan Wants You: The Cult of Devil Worship in America. New York: Mysterious Press..1993. NGO Management: A Guide Through the Literature. London: Centre for Voluntary Organisation.1983. Building Character in the American Boy: The Boy Scouts, YMCA, and Their Forerunners, 1870–1920. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.1979. “Ethnicity, Secret Societies, and Associations: The Japanese in Brazil.”Comparative Studies in Society and History21:589–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500013207.1986. “The Boy Scouts, the Outdoors, and Empire.”Humanity and Society10(1): 37–57.[Page 303]1984. “Professionalism and Nonprofit Organizations.”Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law8:639–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8-4-639.1994. “Rates of Attrition Among the Membership of Alcoholics Anonymous in Finland.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol55:91–95..1982. “Role of Associations as Regards Second-Generation Migrants, Especially From the Point of View of Maintaining Cultural Links With the Country of Origin.”International Migration20:85–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.1982.tb00971.x1989. “Voluntarism and Commercialization in Basketball: The Case of Trinidad and Tobago.”Sociology of Sport Journal6:113–24.and .1990. Green Rage: Radical Environmentalism and the Unmaking of Civilization. Boston: Little, Brown..1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley.and .1990. “Organizing the Mexican American Community in Texas: The Legacy of Saul Alinsky.”Policy Studies Review9:355–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ropr.1989.9.issue-2.1996. “MADDer Than Hell.”Qualitative Health Research6:6–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600102and .1988. “Leadership and Membership in the Nuclear Freeze Movement: A Specification of Resource Mobilization Theory.”Sociological Quarterly29:407–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tsq.1988.29.issue-3.1996. “Frame Changes and Social Movement Contraction: U.S. Peace Movement Framing After the Cold War.”Sociological Inquiry66:1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1996.tb00206.x, , and .1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.1984. Voluntary Nonprofit Enterprise Management. New York: Plenum.1996. Leading and Managing the Expressive Dimension. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1988. “Social Support, Organizational Characteristics, Psychological Well-Being, and Group Appraisal in Three Self-Help Group Populations.”American Journal of Community Psychology16:53–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF009060721995. “Organizational Characteristics of Empowering Community Settings: A Multiple Case Study Approach.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:631–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02506985and .1990. Walking Alone and Marching Together: A History of the Organized Blind Movement in the United States, 1940–1990. Baltimore, MD: National Federation of the Blind.1976. “Study of Volunteer Ambulance Squads.”American Journal of Public Health66:1062–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.66.11.1062, , and .1995. “Sex and Race Homogeneity in Naturally Occurring Groups.”Social Forces74:15–52., . , and .1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press..1983. “Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency.”American Sociological Review48:735–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095322.1997. Social Movements. Los Angeles: Roxbury.and .1991. “The Institutional Channeling of Social Movements by the State in the United States.”Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change13:45–76., , and .1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82:1212–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226464and .McCarthy, Kathleen D., Virginia A.Hodgkinson, Russy D.Sumariwalla, and Associates, eds. 1992. The Nonprofit Sector in the Global Community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1996. “Baseball: Political Economy Would Like to Say ‘It Ain't So’.”Humanity and Society20:87–93..1994. Privatopia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.. [Page 304]1991. “How Nonprofits Adapt to a Stringent Environment.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership1:235–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130010305, , and .1985. “Neighborhood Decentralization and Organized Citizen Participation.”Sociological Focus18:301–12.and .1982. “Hypernetwork Sampling: Duality and Differentiation Among Voluntary Organizations.”Social Networks3:225–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733%2882%2990001-61983a. “An Ecology of Affiliation.”American Sociological Review48:519–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21177191983b. “The Size of Voluntary Organizations.”Social Forces61:1044–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/61.4.10441988. “A Theory of Voluntary Organization.” Pp. 42–76 in Community Organizations, edited by CarlMilofsky. New York: Oxford University Press.1992. “Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics.”American Sociological Review57:153–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096202, , and .1991. “Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space.”Social Forces70:19–42.and .1996. “Testing a Dynamic Model of Social Composition: Diversity and Change in Voluntary Groups.”American Sociological Review61:179–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096330and .1982. “Women and Weak Ties: Differences by Sex in the Size of Voluntary Organizations.”American Journal of Sociology87:883–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227525and .1986. “Sex Segregation in Voluntary Associations.”American Sociological Review51:61–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095478and .1987. “Organising for Empowering the Poor.”Man and Development9 (3): 49–59..1972a. “A Comparative Note on the Prevalence of Voluntary Associations in Geneva and Paris.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1 (3): 42–45..1972b. Vers un Sociologie des Associations (Toward a Sociology of Associations). Paris: Les Editions Ouvrieres..1990. Cults and New Religions: Sources for the Study of Nonconventional Religious Groups in 19th and 20th Century America. New York: Garland.1993. “The Leader Succession-Performance Relationship in a Non-Profit Organization.”Revue Canadienne de Sociologie el d'Anthropologie/Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology30:191–204.1955. “Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement.”American Sociological Review20:3–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2088192.1968. Political Parties. New York: Free Press.. 1987. “Nonprofit Boards of Directors: Beyond the Governance Function.” Pp. 141–53 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..1983. “The Alternative Service Agency.” Pp. 779–91 in Handbook of Clinical Social Work, edited by A.Rosenblatt and D.Waldfogel. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .1986. “Expanding University Resources in Support of Volunteer Development: Evaluation of a Pilot Effort.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:100–15.1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.1987. “Neighborhood-Based Organizations: A Market Analogy.” Pp. 277–95 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..Milofsky, Carl, ed. 1988a. Community Organizations: Studies in Resource Mobilization and Exchange. New York: Oxford University Press.Milofsky, Carl. 1988b. “Structure and Process in Community Self-Help Organizations.” Pp. 183–216 in Community Organizations, edited by CarlMilofsky. New York: Oxford University Press.Milofsky, Carl. 1996. “The End of Nonprofit Management Education.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly25:277–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764096253001[Page 305]1991. “Issues of Accountability in Health Charities: A Case Study of Accountability Problems Among Nonprofit Organizations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly20:371–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409102000403and .1994. “Where Nonprofits Come From: A Theory of Organizational Emergence.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Researchers on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Berkeley, CA, October.and .1988. “The Structure of Funding Arenas for Neighborhood-Based Organizations.” Pp. 217–42 in Community Organizations, edited by CarlMilofsky. New York: Oxford University Press.and .1980. “Self-Help Groups in a Premature Nursery: A Controlled Evaluation.”Journal of Pediatrics96:933–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476%2880%2980586-5, , , , , and .1952. “Cleavage in Women's Organizations.”American Sociological Review18:47–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20878481992. “The Quality of Employment in the Nonprofit Sector: Employee Attitudes in Nonprofits Versus Business and Government.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership3:23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1542-78541983. “Compartmentalization and Parochialism in Religious and Voluntary Action Research.”Review of Religious Research24:318–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/35110101992. “Successful Aging: A Life-Course Perspective on Women's Multiple Roles of Health.”American Journal of Sociology97:1612–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1992.97.issue-6, , and1988. “Grassroots Organizing in China: The Residents' Committee as a Linking Mechanism Between the Bureaucracy and the Community.”Community Development Journal23:164–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/18.104.22.1684. “The Role of Informal Clubs in Youth Development: A South African Case Study.”Journal of Social Development in Africa9:5–29., , and .1978. “People as Lawyers: Lay Advocacy and Self-Help in the Legal System.”British Journal of Law and Society1:121–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/14098541980. “When Less Is More: School Size and Student Social Participation.”Social Psychology Quarterly43:241–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033627and .1977. “Results From Two National Surveys of Philanthropic Activity.” Pp. 157–323 in Research Papers, Vol. 1, edited by the Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury., , and .1970. Farmers' Organizations and Movements. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Agricultural Experiment Station.1984. Managing Voluntary Organizations. Toronto: York University Press..1970. Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding: Community Action in the War on Poverty. New York: Free Press.Mudimbe, V. Y., ed. 1996. Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.1983. The Losers: Gang Delinquency in an American Suburb. New York: Praeger.and .1975. “Economic Determinants of Volunteer Work by Women.”Signs1:325–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/4932251972. “Attitude Determinants of Individual Participation in Organized Voluntary Action.” Pp. 251–76 in Voluntary Action Research: 1972, edited by David H.Smith, Richard D.Reddy, and Burt R.Baldwin. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.and .1980. “Interdependence and Intraorganizational Structure for Voluntary Organizations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research9:20–34.and . [Page 306]1994. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Nonprofit Organizations.” Pp. 303–24 in The Jossey-Bass Handbook on Nonprofit Leadership and Management, edited by R.Herman and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.and .1957. The Theory of Social Structure. London: Cohen & West.1982. MEGATRENDS. New York: Warner..1990. MEGATRENDS 2000. New York: William Morrow.and .1967. “National Associations.” Pp. 276–313 in The Emergent American Society, Vol. 1, edited by W. L.Warner. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1978. “Managing Not-for-Profit Enterprises.”Academy of Management Review3:23–31.and .1975. “Voluntary Organizations in a British City: The Political and Organizational Characteristics of 4,264 Voluntary Associations in Birmingham.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research4:43–62..1979. The Endangered Sector. New York: Columbia University Press..1992. “The Emerging Nonprofit Sector in Bulgaria: Its Historical Dimensions.” Pp. 333–48 in The Nonprofit Sector in the Global Community, edited by Kathleen D.McCarthy, Virginia A.Hodgkinson, Russy D.Sumariwalla, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1992. A History of the Amish. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.1996. “Public Interest Group Entrepreneurship and Theories of Group Mobilization.”Political Research Quarterly49:119–46.and .1994. “A Strategy for Agricultural Progress and Socio-Economic Upliftment: Federation of Farmers' Associations of Nigeria.”Community Development Journal29A0–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/29.1.401983. America's Voluntary Spirit. New York: Foundation Center..1984. The Board Members Boo. New York: Foundation Center..1989. The Third America: The Emergence of the Nonprofit Sector in the United States. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..1994. “Philanthropic Dimensions of Member Benefit Organizations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly23:3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764094231002.1988. Educating Managers of Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Praeger.and .1983. “The Mobilization of Paid and Volunteer Activists in the Neighborhood Movement.”Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change5:133–70..1982. Participatory Pluralism. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press..1996. “Careers in the Third Sector.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:331–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060404and .1981. “Harambee: Self-Help Development Projects in Kenya.” Pp. 93–103 in Volunteers, Voluntary Associations, and Development, edited by David H.Smith and FrederickElkin. Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill.and .1985. “A Portfolio Model of Korean Household Sector Saving Behavior.”Economic Development and Cultural Change33:575–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/edcc.1985.33.issue-3and .1992. “Nonprofit Organizations as Franchise Operations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly2:223–38.1995. Strategic Management for Nonprofit Organizations: Theory and Cases. New York: Oxford University Press.1984. Women of the Upper Class. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.1995. Money for Change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.1985. “Organizational Culture.”Annual Review of Sociology11:457–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.002325and . [Page 307]1986. “Leaders of the Solidarity Movement: A Sociological Portrait.”Sociology20:64–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038586020001006.1985. “Voluntary Associations and Well-Being in Three Metropolitan Areas: Cross-Cultural Evidence.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology22:265–88..1989. “National Trends in Voluntary Association Membership: 1974–1984.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:179–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976408901800208and .1987. “Community Groups in Quebec: From Radical Action to Voluntarism for the State?”Community Development Journal22:281–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/22.4.281.1989. “The Future of Community Groups in Quebec: The Difficult Balance Between Autonomy and Partnership With the State.”Canadian Social Work Review/Revue Canadienne de Service Social6:126–35..1994. Opportunities in Nonprofit Organization Careers. Lincolnwood, IL: VGM Career Horizons.1954. “An Approach to the Study of Relative Prestige of Formal Organizations.”Social Forces32:244–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2573241.1982. “Leading and Following Volunteers: Implications for a Changing Society.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science18:385–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886382018003111993. Volunteers: The Organizational Behavior of Unpaid Workers, London U. London: Routledge.1993. “Public Health Advocacy on Behalf of Women in Sao Paolo: Learning to Participate in the Planning Process.”Journal of Public Health Policy14:183–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3342964, , and .1969. Voluntary Associations, Nomos XI. New York: Atherton.and .1989. “Volunteer Firefighters in the United States: A Descriptive Study.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:269–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764089018003081996. “Oligarchy and Adaptation to Mass Society in an All-Volunteer Organization: Implications for Understanding Leadership, Participation, and Change.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly25:73–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764096251006and .1976. “Grassrooting the System.”Social Policy7:4–20.1982. “The Professionalization of Volunteer Administration.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research11:97–107.1975. “Voluntary Associations and the Community: The Case of Volunteer Ambulance Corps.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research4:85–89..1977. “Emergency Medical Services in Small Communities: Volunteer Ambulance Corps.”Journal of Community Health2:178–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01349703and .1961. “The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organizations.”American Sociological Review26:854–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2090570.1970. “Members as Resources in Voluntary Organizations.” Pp. 93–101 in Organizations and Clients, edited by William R.Rosengren and MarkLefton. Columbus, OH: Merrill..1996. “Corporate Campaigns in Context.”Journal of Labor Research17:329–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF026858511977. Voluntary Associations and Nordic Party Systems. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.and .1988. “Secrets of the Oddfellows.”New Society83:13–15..1990. “Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research.”Annual Review of Sociology16:27–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000331and .1993. “Crisis and the Emergence of Charismatic Leadership in Groups: An Experimental Investigation.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology26:543–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb02730.x[Page 308]1979. Poor People's Movements. New York: Vintage Books.and .1981. Strategies for Community Crime Prevention. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.and .1980. “Social Climates in Community Groups: Toward a Taxonomy.”Community Mental Health Journal16:187–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00835723and .1995. “On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships.”American Journal of Sociology101:698–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230757and .1988. Managing Voluntary Organisations. Chichester, UK: Wiley..1994. Understanding the Self-Help Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1987. The Nonprofit Sector. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1985. “An Empirical Exploration of a Framework of Organizational Viability: Maintaining Block Organizations.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science21:287–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188638502100305and .1990. “Benefits, Costs, Incentive Management, and Participation in Voluntary Organizations: A Means to Understanding and Promoting Empowerment.”Journal of Community Psychology18:117–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00922691, , , , and .1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.”Journal of Democracy6:65–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.00021993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press., , and .1989. Our Sweetest Hours: Recreation and the Mental State of Absorption. Jefferson, NC: McFarland..1994. “Constraining Campaigning: The Legal Treatment of Non-Profit Policy Advocacy Across 24 Countries.”Voluntas5:27–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02353951and1998. “Youth Socialization and Civic Participation: The Role of Secondary Schools in Promoting Community Service in Southern California.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly27:66–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764098271005and .1994. Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government. New York: Times Books..1995. The Ashes of Waco. New York: Simon & Schuster.1951. The 4-H Story. Chicago: National 4-H Service Committee.1966. “The Transition From Social Movement to Organization.” Pp. 17–22 in The Government of Associations, edited by William A.Glaser and David L.Sills. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press..1984. “Alinsky's Legacy: Current Applications and Extensions of His Principles and Strategies.”Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change6:31–55.and .1993. Public Funds, Private Provision: The Role of the Volunteer Sector. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press..1991. “An Exploration of Leadership in a Medical Mutual Help Organization.”American Journal of Community Psychology19:683–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00938039and .1993. The Virtual Community. New York: HarperCollins..1980. “Dynamics of Leadership in Neighborhood Organizations.”Social Science Quarterly60:570–87.1992. “The Alternative Agency as an Active Learner: A Case Study.”Social Work37:406–10.1979. “The Evolution of a Jesus Movement Organization.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research8:93–111.[Page 309]1996. “On the Contribution of Community to Psychological Well-Being: The Importance of Incorporating Group Membership Into Stress Research.” Unpublished master's thesis, University of Western Ontario.1995. The End of Work. New York: Putnam..1983. “Vehicles for Empowerment: The Case of Feminist Movement Organizations.”Prevention in Human Services3:99–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J293v03n02_06.1987. Financial Dependence and Organizational Autonomy: The Ecology of Voluntary Sport in Denmark. International Review for the Sociology of Sport22:193–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/101269028702200304and ,1990. “Voluntary Organizations and the Social State in the European Community.”Voluntas1:98–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01397440.1966. Voluntary Associations: A Study of Groups in Free Societies. Richmond, VA: John Knox Press.1994. “Lesson for Academics From Grassroots Community Organizing: A Case Study—The Industrial Areas Foundation.”Journal of Community Practice1:63–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v01n04_05and .1990. “The Changing Focus of the Hub Club.”The Boston Globe, March 27, pp. 25, 36.1977. How Americans Use Their Time. New York: Praeger.1985. “The Validity and Reliability of Diaries Versus Alternative Time Use Measures.” Pp. 33–62 in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. T.Juster and F. P.Stafford. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.1985. Hare Krishna in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.1988. “On the Birth of Organisations.”L.S.E. Quarterly2:123–53..1989. “Health Psychology.”Annual Review of Psychology40:533–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.002533and .1975. “Voluntary Association Membership and Political Participation: An Exploration of the Mobilization Hypothesis.”Sociological Quarterly16:305–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1975.tb00950.x, , and .1973. “Professionals Versus Volunteers: A Case Study of Adoption Workers in the 1920's.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:95–101..1991. The Natural History of the Universe. New York: Macmillan.1954. Theory and Method in the Social Sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.1955. “Voluntary Associations Under Conditions of Competition and Conflict.”Social Forces34:159–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25728321960. “The Impact of Aging on Voluntary Associations.” Pp. 666–97 in Handbook of Social Gerontology, edited by C. W.Tibbitts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1980. “United Charities: An Economic Analysis.”Public Policy28:323–50.Rose-Ackerman, S., ed. 1986. The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.Rose-Ackerman, S.1990. “Competition Between Non-Profits and For-Profits: Entry and Growth.”Voluntas1:13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF013984891981. “The Neighborhood Movement: Where Has It Come From? Where Is It Going?”Journal of Voluntary Action Research10:4–26.1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.and .1976. An Assembly of Good Fellows: Voluntary Associations in History. Westport, CT: Greenwood.1977. “Primary Groups in Social Movements: A Memoir and Interpretation.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research6:139–52.1979. “The Collectivist Organization.”American Sociological Review44:509–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094585[Page 310]1993. “Community Empowerment: The Alternative Resources Movement in Quebec.”Community Mental Health Journal29:535–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00754262.1989. “Toward a Discipline of Nonprofit Administration: Report From the Clarion Conference.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:279–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976408901800309, , and .1987. “The Scope and Dimensions of Nonprofit Activity.” Pp. 55–64 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..1972. “CORE: The Road From Interracialism to Black Power.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:12–19..1986. Becoming Alcoholic: Alcoholics Anonymous and the Reality of Alcoholism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.1994. Death by Government. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.1990. “Belief Congruence Between Interest Group Leaders and Members: An Empirical Analysis of Three Theories and a Suggested Synthesis.”Journal of Politics52:914–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131832and .1969. Odd Man In: Societies of Deviants in America. Chicago: Quadrangle Books..1989. “Dimensions of Interdependence: The State and Voluntary Sector Relationship.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:335–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764089018004051987. “Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research16:29–49.1992. America's Nonprofit Sector. New York: Foundation Center.1993. “The Nonprofit Almanac: What Are the Issues?”Voluntas4:163–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF013984261982. The Federal Budget and the Nonprofit Sector. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.and .1990. More than Just Charity: The Baltimore Area Nonprofit Sector in a Time of Change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies., , and .1992a. “In Search of the Non-Profit Sector I: The Question of Definitions.”Voluntas3:125–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01397770and .1992b. “In Search of the Non-Profit Sector II: The International Classification of Non-Profit Organisations.”Voluntas3:125–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01397770and .1994. The Emerging Sector. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies.and .1997. Defining the Nonprofit Sector. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.and .1998. The Emerging Sector Revisited: A Summary. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Civil Society Studies., , and Associates.1995. “Managing Traditionality and Strategic Change in Nonprofit Organizations.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060103and .1986. “The Peace Movement: An Anti-Establishment Movement.”Journal of Peace Research23:115–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343386023002031973. “Funding, Conflict, and Change in an Open-Housing Group.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:216–23..1995. Economics.and .15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.1990. “Community Attitudes Toward Trade Union Effectiveness.”Australian Bulletin of Labour16:77–89.and .1980. “The Management of Secrecy: The Ku Klux Klan's Successful Secret.” Pp. 161–77 in Secrecy: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Stanton R.Petit. New York: Human Sciences Press.[Page 311]1979. “How National Associations Help Local Chapters.”Association Management24:67–71.1972. “The Church as a Formal Voluntary Organization.” Pp. 81–108 in Voluntary Action Research: 1972, edited by David H.Smith, Richard D.Reddy, and BurtBaldwin. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books..1993. The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society. New York: Norton.1944. “Biography of a Nation of Joiners.”American Historical Review50:1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/18435651984. “What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality in the American Pressure System.”Journal of Politics46:1006–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131240.1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.and .1973. Oligarchy in Fraternal Organizations: A Study in Organizational Leadership. Detroit, MI: Gale Research International.1972. “Formal Voluntary Groups and Change Over Time: A Study of Fraternal Associations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:46–55.and .1995. “Adolescent Volunteers: An Untapped Resource in the Delivery of Adolescent Preventive Health Care.”Youth & Society27:123–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X95027002001, , , and .1993. The Overworked American. New York: Basic Books.1991. “State, Market, Third Sector: Problems of Organizational Choice in the Delivery of Public Services.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly20:123–36.1995–96. “Bereaved Parents and Support Group Participation.”Omega32:49–61..1990. “Free Riding, Alternative Organization, and Cultural Feminism: The Case of Seneca Women's Peace Camp.”Women and Politics10:1–37.and .1991. Natural Allies: Women's Associations in American History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.1957. “Membership and Participation in Voluntary Associations.”American Sociological Review22:315–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20884731965. Values and Organizations: A Study of Fraternities and Sororities. Chicago: Rand McNally.1957. Community Chest: A Case Study in Philanthropy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press., , and1992. “Explaining Changes in the Population of Voluntary Organizations: The Roles of Aggregate and Individual-Level Data.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:147–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409202100205and .1996. “The Voluntary Community Health Movement in India: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.”Journal of Community Health21:453–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01702605and .1981. “Organizations, Their Environments, and Goal Definition: An Approach to the Study of Neighborhood Associations in Urban Politics.”Urban Life9:415–39.1973. The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Boston: Porter Sargent..1994. “‘Goodness’ Concepts in the Study of Organizations: A Longitudinal Survey of Four Leading Journals.”Organization Studies15:753–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500506, , and .1972. “The Voluntary Society and Its Components.” Pp. 25–38 in Voluntary Action Research: 1972, edited by David H.Smith, Richard D.Reddy, and Burt R.Baldwin. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.. [Page 312]1974. “Interest Groups in Switzerland.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science413:101–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271627441300109.1957. The Volunteers: Means and Ends in a National Organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.1968. “Voluntary Associations: Sociological Aspects.” Pp. 363–76 in The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 16, edited by DavidSills. New York: Macmillan.1987. “The Tax Treatment of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review of Federal and State Policies.” Pp. 67–98 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1962. “Goals, Environmental Pressures, and Organizational Characteristics.”American Sociological Review27:344–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2089796and .1997. The Klan..2nd ed. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.1997. “Inventing the British Voluntary Sector by Committee: From Wolfenden to Deakin.”Non-Profit Studies1:33–45.and .1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press..1975. “Reality, Social Work, and Community Organization.”Community Development Journal10:162–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/10.3.1621992. “The Use of Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes to Classify the Activities of Nonprofit, Tax-Exempt Organizations.” Working Paper No. 19, University of San Francisco, Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management..1992. Asian and Hispanic Philanthropy. San Francisco: University of San Francisco Press., , and .1972. Voluntary Associations: Perspectives on the Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.and .1964. “Psychological Factors Affecting Participation in Formal Voluntary Organizations in Chile.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.1966. “A Psychological Model of Individual Participation in Formal Voluntary Organizations: Application to Some Chilean Data.”American Journal of Sociology72:249–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/2242931967. “A Parsimonious Definition of ‘Group’: Toward Conceptual Clarity and Scientific Utility.”Sociological Inquiry37:141–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soin.1967.37.issue-21972a. “The Journal of Voluntary Action Research: An Introduction.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:2–5.1972b. “Major Analytical Topics of Voluntary Action Research: An Introduction.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:6–19.1972c. “Organizational Boundaries and Organizational Affiliates.”Sociology and Social Research56:494–512.1972d. “Ritual in Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:39–53.1973a. “The Impact of the Voluntary Sector on Society.” Pp. 387–99 in Voluntary Action Research: 1973, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1973b. Latin American Student Activism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1973c. “Modernization and the Emergence of Voluntary Organizations.” Pp. 49–73 in Voluntary Action Research: 1973, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1974. Voluntary Action Research: 1974. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1975. “Voluntary Action and Voluntary Groups.”Annual Review of Sociology1:247–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.0013351977. “The Role of the United Way in Philanthropy.” Pp. 1093–1108 in Research Papers, Sponsored by the Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs, Vol. 2, Part 2, edited by Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.1978. “The Philanthropy Business.”Society15:8–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03180993[Page 313]1981. “Altruism, Volunteers, and Volunteerism.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research10:21–36.1984. “Churches Are Generally Ignored in Contemporary Voluntary Action Research: Causes and Consequences.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research13:11–18.1986a. “Outstanding Local Voluntary Organizations in the 1960's: Their Distinguishing Characteristics.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:24–35.1986b. “Social Movement: A Voluntary Group Definition.” Pp. 153–58 in Proceedings of the 1986 Annual Meeting of the Association of Voluntary Action Scholars. College Park: Pennsylvania State University.1990. “Voluntary Inter-Cultural Exchange and Understanding Groups: The Roots of Success in U.S. Sister City Programs.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology31:177–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020715290031003031991. “Four Sectors or Five? Retaining the Member Benefit Sector.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly20:137–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764091020002031992a. “National Nonprofit, Voluntary Associations: Some Parameters.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:81–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764092021001071992b. “A Neglected Type of Voluntary Nonprofit Organization: Exploration of the Semi-Formal, Fluid Membership Organization.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:252–70.1993a. “The Field of Nonprofit and Voluntary Action Research: Then and Now.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:197–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08997640932230021993b. “Public Benefit and Member Benefit Nonprofit, Voluntary Groups.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:53–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764093022001051994a. “Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly23:243–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764094023003051994b. “The Rest of the Nonprofit Sector: The Nature, Magnitude, and Impact of Grassroots Associations in America.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Researchers on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Berkeley, CA, October.1995a. “Churches Are Mainly Member Benefit Nonprofits, Not Public Benefit Nonprofits.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Researchers on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Cleveland, OH, November.1995b. “Democratic Personality.” Pp. 941–43 in The Encyclopedia of Democracy, Vol. 3, edited by Seymour M.Lipset. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.1995c. “Deviant Voluntary Groups: Ideology, Accountability, and Subcultures of Deviance in Nonprofits.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Researchers on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Cleveland, OH, November.1995d. “Improving Classification of Nonprofits: Some Comments on the NTEE and ICNPO.” Unpublished manuscript, Boston College.1995e. “Some Challenges in Nonprofit and Voluntary Action Research.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly24:99–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764095024002021996. “Improving the International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:317–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.41300603101997a. “Grassroots Associations Are Important: Some Theory and a Review of the Impact Literature.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26:269–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08997640972630021997b. “Grassroots Associations: The Lost Non-Profit World.”Chronicle of Philanthropy, September 18, pp. 44–45.1997c. “The International History of Grassroots Associations.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology38:1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020715297038003011997d. “The Rest of the Nonprofit Sector: Grassroots Associations as the Dark Matter Ignored in Prevailing ‘Flat-Earth’ Maps of the Sector.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26:114–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764097262002[Page 314]1998a. “Material vs. Personal Resource Attraction Systems for Local All-Volunteer Groups.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Researchers on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Seattle, WA, November.1998b. “Negative Social Capital and Deviant Voluntary Groups.” Paper presented at the Michigan State University International Conference on Social Capital, East Lansing, MI, April.1999a. “The Effective Grassroots Association, Part 1: Organizational Factors That Produce Internal Impact.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership9:443–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1542-78541999b. “The Effective Grassroots Association: II. Organizational Factors That Produce External Impact.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership10:103–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854Organizations on the Fringe: Understanding Deviant Nonprofits as Part of a Round-Earth Paradigm of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector.Forthcoming a.“Researching Volunteer Associations and Other Nonprofits: An Emergent Interdisciplinary Field and Potential New Discipline.”American Sociologist30.Forthcoming b.Volunteer Participation: A Round-Earth Paradigm of Individual Involvement in the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector.Forthcoming c.The World History and Geography of Associations and Other Nonprofits: A Theoretical Approach.and Associates. Forthcoming.1974a. “Parental Influence, Socioeconomic Status, and Voluntary Organization Participation.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research3:59–66.and .1974b. “Voluntary Associations and Volunteering in the United States.” Pp. 277–305 in Voluntary Action Research: 1974, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.and .1983. “Voluntary Organization Prevalence in the States of the USA: Presentation and a Test of the Revised Smith Model.” Pp. 50–62 in International Perspectives on Voluntary Action Research, edited by David H.Smith and JonVan Til. Washington, DC: University Press of America.and .1988. “The Nonprofit Sector.” Pp. 1.3–1.15 in The Nonprofit Organization Handbook, edited by Tracy D.Connors. New York: McGraw-Hill., , and .Concepts and Terminology for Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Studies.and . Forthcoming.1981. Volunteers, Voluntary Organizations, and Development. Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill.and .1980. Participation in Social and Political Activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , and Associates.1972a. “Types of Voluntary Action: A Definitional Essay.” Pp. 159–95 in Voluntary Action Research: 1972, edited by David H.Smith, Richard D.Reddy, and Burt R.Baldwin. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books., , and .1972b. Voluntary Action Research: 1972. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books., , and .1973. “The Impact of Voluntary Action on the Volunteer/Participant.” Pp. 169–237 in Voluntary Action Research: 1973, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.and .1973. “Dimensions and Categories of Voluntary Organizations/NGOs.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:116–20., , and .1996. “Factors Characterizing the Most Effective Nonprofits Managed by Volunteers.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:271–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060306and .1983. International Perspectives on Voluntary Action Research. Washington, DC: University Press of America.and , with the collaboration of , , and .1977. “Higher Education Programs for Volunteer Administrators.”Volunteer Administration10:1–9.and . [Page 315]1975. “Women as Volunteers: The Double Subsidy.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research4:119–36.1990. “Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism, and Neopluralism: The Role of Pressure Groups in Policy-Making.”Political Studies37:302–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/post.1990.38.issue-21993. Nonprofits for Hire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.and .1990. “Trends in Voluntary Group Membership: Comments on Baumgartner and Walker.”American Journal of Political Science34:646–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21113921970. “Longitudinal Analysis of Social Participation in High School and Early Adulthood Voluntary Associational Participation.”Adolescence5:79–88.1971. “Savings Associations Among the Bamileke: Traditional and Modern Cooperation in South-West Cameroon.”Journal de la Societé des Africanistes2:189–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/jafr.1971.1689and .1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1996. “Mechanisms of Empowerment: Psychological Processes for Members of Power-Based Community Organizations.”Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology6:177–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1298%28199608%296:3%3C177::AID-CASP368%3E3.0.CO;2-Nand .1991. “Politics Beyond Turf: Grassroots Democracy in the Helsinki Process.”Bulletin of Peace Proposals22:427–35..1995. The Youth Gang Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.1989. “Stability and Innovation in the Women's Movement: A Comparison of Two Movement Organizations.”Social Problems36:75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1989.36.1.03a00060.1985. “Emergent Citizen Groups and Emergency Management.”Public Administration Review9:67–82.and .1973. “Patterns of Belief in Social Movements: Clarifications from an Analysis of Environmental Groups.”Sociological Quarterly14:465–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1973.tb01385.xStandard & Poor's. 1999. Standard & Poor's Register of Corporations, Directors, and Executives. New York: Standard & Poor's Corporation.1970) Clients Come Last: Volunteers and Welfare Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.. (1994. Sociology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth..1968. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press.and .1993. “Profit Making by Nonprofit Hospitals.” Pp. 105–37 in Nonprofit Organizations in a Market Economy, edited by David C.Hammack and Dennis R.Young. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1991. “The Third Sector in the Second World.”World Development19:65–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X%2891%2990038-J.1979. Amateurs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.1996. “Volunteering: A Serious Leisure Perspective.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly25:211–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08997640962520051975. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.1986. “Between Organization and Movement: ACORN and the Alinsky Model of Community Organizing.”Berkeley Journal of Sociology31:93–115.1987. “Nonprofit Organizations and the Market.” Pp. 118–38 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..1990. “Labor Economics and the Nonprofit Sector: A Literature Review.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19:151–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409001900206.1981. The Ethnic Myth: Race, Ethnicity, and Class in America. Boston: Beacon.. [Page 316]1976. “Redefining Deviance: The Self-Help Challenge to the Human Services.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science12:347–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188637601200307and .1973. “Internal Structure of a Voluntary Political Organization: A Case Study.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:240–43..1988. “Organizational Demography.”Annual Review of Sociology14:173–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001133.1976. “Toward an Economic Model of Vountarism: The Case of Participation in Local Government.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research5:52–60.and .1993. “The Federated Frontstage Structure and Localized Social Movements: A Case Study of the Cedar-Riverside Neighborhood Movement.”Social Science Quarterly74:56–68..1986. “Administration of Volunteer Programs as a Career: What Role for Higher Education?”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:4–12.and .1984. “Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions.”The Economic Journal94:772–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/22322941984. “The Role of Ideology in Self-Help Groups.”Social Policy14:29–36.1986. “The Ideology of Overeaters Anonymous.”Social Policy16:48–53.and .1996. Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives. New York: Pantheon.1974. “Non-Governmental Organizations in the USSR, 1958–1973.” Pp. 69–86 in Voluntary Action Research: 1974, edited by David H.Smith. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1961. “Control and Effectiveness in a Voluntary Organization.”American Journal of Sociology67:57–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/2230481992. Civil Society. London: Routledge..1986. “Educating Leadership for Effecting Community Change Through Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Social Work Education22:19–29.and .1993. “Volunteers and Their Communities: A Comparative Analysis of Volunteer Fire Fighters.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:155–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409302200205.1995. “The Sexual Division of Leadership in Volunteer Emergency Medical Service Squads.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060106.1980. “Organizations as Constructors of Social Reality.” In Control and Ideology in Organizations, edited by G.Salamon and K.Thompson. Cambridge: MIT Press.1980. “Voluntary Associations and Voting Turnout of American Ethnoreligious Groups.”Ethnicity7:56–69.and .1958. Homo Faber: Work Through the Ages. Chicago: Regnery..1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley..1975. “The Professionalization Process: A Study of an Aspiring Occupational Organization.”Sociological Review23:607–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1975.tb02237.xand .1985. “Revolutionary Optimism and the Practice of Revolution: The Jewish Bund in 1905.”Jewish Social Studies47:135–50.and .1991. “Effectiveness in Voluntary Organizations: An Empirical Assessment.”Sociological Focus24:157–74., , and .1984. “From Mutual Aid Self-Help to Professional Service.”Social Casework65:622–27.1973. “Voluntary Self-Help Organizations: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research2:230–39.and .1990. “Activity Areas and Developmental Stages in Self-Help Groups.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19: 263–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409001900307, , , and . [Page 317]1983. “Correlates of Volunteering in Advocacy Planning: Testing a Theory.” Pp. 95–104 in International Perspectives on Voluntary Action Research, edited by David H.Smith and JonVan Til. Washington, DC: University Press of America.and .1979. “Solidarity and Symbolism Among Journeymen Artisans: The Case of Compagnonnage.”Comparative Studies in Society and History21:214–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S00104175000128341955. “Organizational Change in Terms of a Series of Selected Variables.”American Sociological Review20:206–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20883271991. “A Methodology for Measuring the Financial Vulnerability of Charitable Nonprofit Organizations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly20:445–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976409102000407and .1993. “The NTEE Classification System: Tests of Reliability/Validity in the Field of Higher Education.”Voluntas4:73–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01398385, , and .1969. Homo Faber: A Study of Man's Mental Evolution. London: Methuen.1974. The Totalitarian Party: Party and People in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.1983. “Neighboring and Its Role in Block Organizations: An Exploratory Report.”American Journal of Community Psychology11:291–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00893369and .1982. “The Strategy Gap in Not-for-Profits.”Harvard Business Review60:30–40.and .U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1993. Statistical Abstract of the United Stales: 1993, 113th Edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.U.S. Department of the Treasury. 1979. Cumulative List of Organizations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service.1986. “The Supply of Volunteer Work: The Case of Canada.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:45–56.and .1986. “Self-Help and Government Policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Voluntary Action Research15:24–32.and .1987. “The Three Sectors: Voluntarism in the Changing Political Economy.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research16:50–63..1988. Mapping the Third Sector: Voluntarism in a Changing Social Economy. New York: Foundation Center..1994. “Defining the Nonprofit Sector.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Berkeley, CA, November.and .1988. Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. New York: Praeger..1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., , and .1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.and .1968. Small Town in Mass Society.and .Rev. ed.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.1975. “Ruralism as a Way of Life? Stratification and Voluntary Associations in a Tuscan Village.”Sociologia Ruralis15:245–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1975.tb00177.x.1991. “On Sharing: A Preface to an Economic Theory of Voluntary Action.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly20:359–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764091020004021975. “Organizational Change, Citizen Participation, and Voluntary Action.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research4:4–22..1983. “Limits of Strategic Management in Voluntary Organizations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research12:39–56.. [Page 318]1895. Etude Historique sur les Corporations Professionelles Chez, les Romains Depuis les Origines Jusqu la Chute de L'Empire D'Occident. Louvain, Belgium: Paters.1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.1972. “Major Conceptual Elements of Voluntary Associations.” Pp. 71–80 in Voluntary Action Research: 1972, edited by David H.Smith, Richard D.Reddy, and BurtBaldwin. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1967. “Benefit-Participation Contingency in Voluntary Farm Organizations.”Rural Sociology32:139–53.and .1949. Democracy in Jonesville. New York: Harper.1941. The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.and .1967. “The Interorganizational Field as a Focus for Investigation.”Administrative Science Quarterly12:396–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391312.1974. The Structure of Urban Reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books., , and .1965. “Four Types of Voluntary Associations.”Sociological Inquiry35:138–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1965.tb00597.xand .1994. “Founding Mothers: The Contributions of Women's Organizations to Public Library Development in the United States.”Library Quarterly64:233–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/lq.1994.64.issue-31947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press..1952. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner..1972. “Max Weber's Proposal for the Sociological Study of Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research1:20–23..1989. “The Impact of Support Resources on Local Chapter Operations in the Anti-Drunk Driving Movement.”Sociological Quarterly30:77–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tsq.1989.30.issue-11983. Making Sense of the Jonestown Suicides. New York: Edwin Mellen..1977. The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector: An Economic Analysis. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.1988. The Nonprofit Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1992. “Tax Policy Toward Nonprofit Organizations: A Ten Country Survey.” Pp. 29–50 in The Nonprofit Sector in the Global Community: Voices From Many Nations, edited by K. D.McCarthy, V. A.Hodgkinson, R. A.Sumariwalla, Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1983. Measuring the Number of Hours Spent and Dollar Value of Volunteer Activity of Americans. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.1984. “Fund-Raising at the Workplace.”Social Policy14:55–60., , and .1976. “Evolution of Structure and Process in Voluntary Organizations: A Study of 35 Consumer Food Cooperatives.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research5:4–15.1988. “Adult Learning Through Participation in Rural Community Groups.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research17:55–69., , , and .1989. “Rational Planning vs. Regional Interests: The Professionalization of Canadian Amateur Sport.”Canadian Public Policy15:436–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3550359and .1985. “Why Board Members Participate.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research14:8–23..1991. “Board Members' Perceptions of Their Roles and Responsibilities.” In Collaboration: The Vital Link Across Practice, Research, and the Disciplines, edited by Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action. Pullman, WA: ARNOVA.. [Page 319]1989. “The Limits of Progressive Municipal Economic Development: Job Creation in Chicago, 1983–1987.”Community Development Journal24:111–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/24.2.111and .1991. “Defining Voluntary Groups and Agencies Within Organization Science.”Organization Science2:366–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.4.366and .1953. “Group Prestige in Voluntary Organizations: A Study of College Sororities.”Human Relations6:57–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675300600104and .1986. “Improving Care in Nursing Homes Using Community Advocacy.”Social Science and Medicine23:1297–1303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536%2886%2990292-3.1970. Religious Sects: A Sociological Study. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.1992. “The Strategic Challenges of Cooperation in British Voluntary Organizations: Toward the Next Century.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership2:239–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1542-78541980. “Voluntary Associations and Civil Religion: The Case of Freemasonry.”Review of Religious Research22:125–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3510655.1992. “Local Human Service Provision by Religious Congregations: A Community Analysis.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly21:107–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764092021002021993. “Colleges Offering More Nonprofit Graduate Programs.”Non-Profit Times, June, pp. 22–23.1996. “Electronic Grassroots Organizing.”Journal of Social Issues52 (1): 53–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01361.xand .1990. The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition. New York: Foundation Center.1985. “A Defense of Participatory Democracy.”Review of Politics47:370–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500036925Wolfenden Committee. 1978. The Future of Voluntary Organisations. London: Croom Helm.1991. Wilderness on the Rocks. Tucson, AZ: Ned Ludd.1975. “The Economic Role and Value of Volunteer Work in the United States: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research4:23–42.1981. Leadership in Voluntary Organizations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.1981. “A Radical Shift From Bureaucracy to Strategic Management in Voluntary Organizations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research10:62–81.1958. “Voluntary Association Memberships of American Adults: Evidence From National Sample Surveys.”American Sociological Review23:284–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2089242and .1961. “The Oversocialized Concept of Man in Modern Sociology.”American Sociological Review26:183–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20898541990. “Religion and the Voluntary Spirit in the United States: Mapping the Terrain.” Pp. 3–21 in Faith and Philanthropy in America, edited by RobertWuthrow, VirginiaHodgkinson, and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..1994. Sharing the Journey: Support Groups and America's New Quest for Community. New York: Free Press..1998. Loose Connections: Joining Together in America's Fragmented Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press..1988. Trade Associations in Business History. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.and .1992. “Razvitie Ekologicheskikh Dvizheniy na Zapade i Vostoke Evropy” (The Development of the Ecological Movement in the West and East of Europe). Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya19:32–39.1981. Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys..4th ed. London: Charles Griffin.1996. “Competing Nonprofit Organizations Also Collaborate.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership7:15–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130070104and .1983. If Not for Profit, for What?Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.[Page 320]1987. “Executive Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations.” Pp. 167–79 in The Nonprofit Sector, edited by Walter W.Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.1989. “Local Autonomy in a Franchise Age: Structural Change in National Voluntary Associations.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly18:101–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764089018002031996. “Structure and Accountability: A Study of National Nonprofit Associations.”Nonprofit Management and Leadership6:347–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854, , and .1993. Governing, Leading, and Managing Nonprofit Organizations: New Insights From Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , , and Associates.1965. “The Contribution of Voluntary Organizations to Community Structure.”American Journal of Sociology71:178–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/224032and .1967. “A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness.”American Sociological Review32:891–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092843and .1981. Alienation and Charisma: A Study of Contemporary Communes. New York: Free Press.1991. “Volunteer Organizations in Disasters.”Journal of Volunteer Administration9:18–28., , , .1970. Organizational Change; The Political Economy of the YMCA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1966. “Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decline, and Change.”Social Forces44:327–40.and .1978. “Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'état, Insurgency, and Mass Movements.”American Journal of Sociology83:823–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1978.83.issue-4and .1983. “From Evangelism to General Service: The Transformation of the YMCA.”Administrative Science Quarterly8:214–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2390900and .1995. Countercultures. New York: St. Martin's.1992. The Mental Discovery of America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.1993. “Unorganized Interests and Collective Action in Communist China.”American Sociological Review58:54–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096218.1995. “Psychological Empowerment: Issues and Illustrations.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:581–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF025069831988. “Citizen Participation, Perceived Control, and Psychological Empowerment.”American Journal of Community Psychology16:725–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00930023and .1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.1984. “Roundup: Volunteer Experience a Plus on a ‘Résumé’.”Personnel61:40–42.and .1978. “Ephemeral Roles, Voluntary Action, and Voluntary Associations.”Journal of Voluntary Action Research7:65–74.
About the Author[Page 342]
David Horton Smith has been a Professor of Sociology at Boston College since 1976 and was Associate Professor there from 1968 to 1976. He currently is on a leave of absence from the university.
Born and raised in the Los Angeles Area, he received his B.A. from the University of Southern California (1960) magna cum laude in three major departments/fields: philosophy, psychology, and sociology. He was elected to the Phi Beta Kappa and Phi Kappa Phi honorary societies, and on graduation he received a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship and a Woodrow Wilson Honorary Fellowship. His M.A. (1962) and Ph.D. (1965) in sociology were received from Harvard University in the interdisciplinary Department of Social Relations.
He was the founder and first president of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA), the first interdisciplinary and interprofessional association in the field (1971), and he was the founder and first editor of its journal Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (1972). He spent the period from 1971 to 1974 in Washington, D.C., as research director for a nonprofit concerned with voluntarism (the Center for a Voluntary Society) that supported his work in founding ARNOVA through Boston College. He has published more than 100 articles and book chapters on nonprofit and voluntary action research and has written or edited eight earlier books in the field. His major books include Voluntary Action Research: 1972, 1973, and 1974 (a three-volume series), Participation in Social and Political Activities (1980), and International Participation in Voluntary Action Research (1983, edited with Jon Van Til).
He was the recipient of the first ARNOVA Lifetime Achievement Award for Distinguished Contribution to Nonprofit and Voluntary Action Research (1993). Recently, he has been the founding chair of the new Community/Grassroots Associations Section of ARNOVA.