Globalization and Belonging
Publication Year: 2005
'Globalization and Belonging's headline message - that place matters, that locality remains vital to people, is arresting' - Frank Webster, Professor of Sociology, City University, London Drawing on long-term empirical research into cultural practices, lifestyles and identities, Globalization and Belonging explores how far-reaching global changes are articulated locally. The authors address key sociological issues of stratification as analysis alongside 'cultural' issues of identity, difference, choice and lifestyle. Their original argument: " Shows how globalisation theory conceives of the 'local'" Reveals that people have a sense of elective belonging based on where they choose to put down roots " Suggests that the feel of a place is much more strongly influenced by the values and lifestyles of those migrating to it" reinvigorates debates in urban and ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Global Change and Local Belonging
- Chapter 2: The Limits of Local Attachment
- Chapter 3: Parenting, Education and Elective Belonging
- Chapter 4: Suburbia and the Aura of Place
- Chapter 5: The Ambivalence of Urban Identity: ‘Manchester, So Much to Answer for’
- Chapter 6: Work Cultures and Social Ties
- Chapter 7: Mediascapes in the Mediation of the Local and the Global
- Chapter 8: Cosmopolitanism, Diaspora and Global Reflexivity
Theory, Culture & Society[Page ii]
Theory, Culture & Society caters for the resurgence of interest in culture within contemporary social science and the humanities. Building on the heritage of classical social theory the book series examines ways in which this tradition has been reshaped by a new generation of theorists. It also publishes theoretically informed analyses of everyday life, popular culture, and new intellectual movements.
EDITOR: Mike Featherstone, Nottingham Trent University
SERIES EDITORIAL BOARD
Roy Boyne, University of Durham
Mike Hepworth, University of Aberdeen
Scott Lash, Goldsmiths College, University of London
Roland Robertson, University of Aberdeen
Bryan S. Turner, University of Cambridge
THE TCS CENTRE
The Theory, Culture & Society book series, the journals Theory, Culture & Society and Body & Society, and related conference, seminar and postgraduate programmes operate from the TCS Centre at Nottingham Trent University. For further details of the TCS Centre's activities please contact:
The TCS Centre, Room 175
Faculty of Humanities
Nottingham Trent University
Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK
Recent volumes include:
Sex and Manners
The Body and Social Theory
Religion, Realism and Social Theory
Phillip A. Mellor
The Body in Culture, Technology and Society
© Mike Savage, Gaynor Bagnall, Brian Longhurst 2005
First published 2005
Published in association with Theory, Culture & Society, Nottingham Trent University
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Inquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B-42 Panchshell Enclave
Post Box 4109
New Delhi 110 017
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress control number available
Typeset by C&M Digital (P) Ltd., Chennai, India
Printed and bound in Great Britain by Athanaeum Press, Gateshead
List of Tables and Maps[Page vi]
- Table 1.1: Percent of households in each area falling into various ACORN postcode categories 20
- Table 1.2: Statistics of achieved sample 21
- Table 2.1: Response to the question: ‘What kind of people live round here?’ 32
- Table 2.2: Numbers of respondents' references to occupations and/or class in response to the question: ‘What kind of people live round here?’ 34
- Table 2.3: Areas where respondents were brought up 45
- Table 2.4: Location of kin 46
- Table 2.5: Percentage of those brought up in different places who feel they belong in area of current residence 47
- Table 3.1: Respondents with children and age of children 57
- Table 3.2: Respondents with children in education and mode of schooling 63
- Table 3.3: Respondents involved with PTA and type of involvement 72
- Table 4.1: Neighbouring practices 84
- Table 4.2: Percentage of respondents referring to London in various ways 94
- Table 4.3: Strength and orientation of place identifications 102
- Table 5.1: Respondents use of Manchester's urban space 114
- Table 5.2: Use of cultural facilities in Manchester centre 120
- Table 5.3: Urban and regional identification of respondents 124
- Table 6.1: The organisation of friendship 143
- Table 7.1: Non-prompted mentions of television programmes 158
- Table 7.2: Possession of cable and satellite television 160
- Table 7.3: Type of reference to music by respondents 169
- Table 7.4: Reading practices 171
- Table 7.5: Geography of cultural referents 174 [Page vii]
- Table 8.1: Ethnic identification of respondents 183
- Table 8.2: Overseas contacts of respondents 187
- Map 1.1: Location of case study areas 18
- Map 2.1: Map of Greater Manchester locations 40
- Map 5.1: Map of Central Manchester locations 111
Preface and Acknowledgements[Page viii]
The origins of this book date from 1996 when the Economic and Social Research Council (to whom we are duly grateful) funded our project called ‘Lifestyles and Social Integration: a study of middle-class culture in Manchester’. The aims of the research project were influenced by what Rosemary Crompton (1998) has identified as the ‘employment aggregate’ approach to class analysis. This perspective, associated with sociologists such as John Goldthorpe and Gordon Marshall, considers how people's class position within employment relationships affects their life chances and actions, such as their educational achievement (famously, Halsey et al. 1980), or political orientations (Heath et al. 1985, 1991; Evans 1999). We were aware that this perspective had not been much applied to the study of consumption, leisure practices and lifestyles (though see Savage et al. 1992, and subsequent discussions in Butler and Savage 1995; Chaney 1996; Lury 1997; Warde 1997 for partial exceptions), and were especially interested to map differences in middle-class lifestyles. Our plan, therefore, was to use qualitative methods to expand our understanding of consumption patterns and lifestyles within the middle-class, focusing on four local areas chosen to exemplify potentially different forms of middle-class culture. We were concerned to pay particular attention to the local contexts in which consumption took place, drawing upon Gaynor Bagnall's and Brian Longhurst's earlier research on audiences (Longhurst and Savage 1996; Bagnall 1996, 1998; Abercrombie and Longhurst 1998).
The research was conducted between 1997 and 1999, and duly led to a clutch of papers (Longhurst et al. 2001; Savage 2000; Savage et al. 2001; Savage et al. 2004a; Bangnall et al. 2003). However, we did not have time to fully write up our research immediately after completing the fieldwork. Gaynor took up her first lecturing post at Liverpool John Moores University with all the demands that a new job entailed. Brian became Director of the Institute for Social Research (and later Head of the School of English, Sociology, Politics and Contemporary History) at the University of Salford, and Mike became Head of the Sociology Department at the University of Manchester. In addition, we all had the demands of young children! While we had time to ‘mine’ the data for issues of particular interest, such as class identity (Savage et al. 2001), or radio listening (Longhurst et al. 2001), we did not have the chance to analyse the interview data as a whole, much of which was left untouched until 2002. The bulk of the data was analysed and the book written from summer 2002 to summer 2003 when Mike had a year's [Page ix]sabbatical. Mike therefore took the lead, with input from Gaynor and Brain, in writing up what had been very much a team project.
When we came to write this book, our framing concerns had shifted. Mike's Class Analysis and Social Transformation (2000), written after we collected the data but before we fully analysed it, saw him becoming more sceptical of the scope of the ‘employment aggregate’ approach to class analysis for the understanding of consumption and lifestyle. He argued that while close relationships between class position and life-chances could be detected, there was little evidence that identity, values and lifestyles were so directly linked. This was of course a familiar (though largely untested) claim in much sociological writing of this period (see for instance Chaney 1996). We became increasingly interested in understanding the local contexts in which we carried out our interviews, and understanding the relationship between locale, lifestyles and identities. Rather then seeing class cultures and lifestyles as fundamentally the product of occupation and employment, could we instead see them as arising out of residential processes?
This new interest chimed in with research demonstrating the significance of place for outcomes in the areas of health, political alignments, and so on. But it raised its own can of worms. We needed to consider how our research related to older debates in community studies and urban sociology regarding the significance of place, neighbourhood and community. More seriously still, it was not clear what theoretical warrant there was for emphasising local processes when, in a globalised world, people and objects were held to be mobile. Furthermore, given the general acceptance that neighbourhoods are not now (even if they ever were) face-to-face communities, how could we understand the salience of place? We became preoccupied by resolving these issues, which led us to put the analysis of middle-class cultures, consumption and lifestyles into a different theoretical frame.
In the end we have written a book about the nature of local belonging in a global world. We hope that we have cast our local case studies in a way that will be interesting to a wide audience, including people who have no interest in, or knowledge of, the North West of England. The strength of our book, we would like to think, is in the quality of the interviews we carried out. There is no shortage of sophisticated theoretical frameworks, but there is very little empirical research which allows us to explore what globalisation ‘on the ground’ entails. This is the gap that we hope our book addresses in an interesting – and perhaps provocative – way!
The first chapter rehearses our theoretical concerns and lays out our methodology. Chapter 1 argues that while globalisation theory is deeply concerned with understanding the relationship between the global and the local, we need to distinguish those approaches which see the local simply as an instance of epochal global change, and those which see the local as irritant. Taking up the latter approach through the insights of Arjun Appadurai, Walter Benjamin and Doreen Massey, we show how Pierre Bourdieu's social theory might be extended to understand how people might feel they belong in certain contexts. Chapter 1 also briefly outlines [Page x]and defends our methodology, and introduces our choice of Manchester as a suitable place to examine these issues.
Chapter 2 is possibly the most important chapter in the book in introducing our core concept of elective belonging. We show that people's feeling of belonging is not linked to any historical roots they may have in the area. Indeed, those relatively few people who are ‘born and bred’ in the place where they still live often feel ill at ease there. However, we also show that people are critical of those who they see as transients, with no ties to the place they now live in. Our concept of elective belonging argues that places are not characterised by tensions between insiders and outsiders but that instead they are defined as locales for people electing to belong (and not just reside) in specific places.
This argument is elaborated in later chapters. Chapter 3 shows that bringing up children plays a key role in this process of electing to belong. In-migrants who bring up children, talk about the way that this makes them feel at home. However, following the work of Ball (2002) and Butler and Robson (2003a) we show how such groups are concerned with the local politics of schooling, and how belonging is therefore related to the wider spatial organization of the educational field. Choosing to belong to a place hence involves comparing places and invoking a relational frame of awareness.
Chapter 4 takes this argument further by showing how people's sense of feeling at home depends not on their attachment to some kind of face-to-face community but to the way that they connect their location to other places that they prize. In a world with global connections, residents routinely associate the place that they live with other places, sometimes places at a significant distance such as London. However, we also show that these kinds of networks of the cultural imaginary are not fully global in scope: the spatial references rarely stretch beyond the British Isles.
Chapter 5 considers how our respondents talked about the city of Manchester. For all our four areas, Manchester was the nearest major city, and most respondents had very clear and emotive views about the city. We show, however, that the significance of Manchester is not that where people feel loyalty to a community with which they are bound. Rather, people's perceptions of the city are related to their visualisation of its special sites and its role as centre of high culture. We use these findings to criticise arguments associated with the ‘LA School’ regarding the fragmentation and decentralisation of urban space, and lend critical support to Le Gales's recent emphasis on the distinctive character of European cities.
Chapter 6 considers how work cultures affects the nature of social ties, and allows us to examine the extent of class formation in our four areas. We show that people's friendship patterns and interaction with work colleagues is remarkably differentiated, with little overlap between these spheres. There is relatively little spill over between work and social life, leading us to doubt that there are any marked processes of class formation currently visible.
Chapter 7 explores the role of the media in the cultural imaginary of our respondents. The media is often seen as central to the organisation of global [Page xi]cultural flows, yet we show how people's media use is more complex than such a view might suppose. People distance themselves from media use, and emphasise their agency choosing what they watch. We show how people are concerned to mark place in their narratives of the media use, and we demonstrate, against the claims of globalisation theory, that the spatial range of most cultural references is highly delimited.
Chapter 8 focuses specifically on people's global reflexivity to consider how they talked about global issues and connections. We argue for the value of seeing our respondents as part of a British imperial diaspora, with connections spread to other parts of the English speaking world, but with little other contact. We show how limited people's sense of global reflexivity actually is, and argue that the concept of cosmopolitanism has little value in accounting for global awareness. Finally, we lay out our main arguments with respect to globalisation theory in the Conclusion.
Turning to our acknowledgements, we would like to thank Sage (and Chris Rojek and the Theory, Culture and Society team in particular) for agreeing to publish our book. In a period when it is ever more difficult to publish research-based books, we sincerely thank them for their support, and hope they are happy with the result. Sage's reader, Frank Webster, helped us to sharpen our final manuscript. It should be noted that we have not had space to report all the findings germane to our concerns. Readers who are interested in how our arguments relate to debates on social capital might therefore wish to consult Bagnall et al. (2003), Savage et al. (2004, 2005), on social class (Savage et al. 2004b).
Needless to say, we have learnt much from many people during this project. First and foremost we are obviously grateful to the ESRC for their support (and more particularly, the support of its referees) without which this book could not have been written. During the early stages of the research project we were guided by a steering group which included Steve Edgell (Salford), Ronnie Frankenberg (Brunel/Keele), Karen Evans (Liverpool), Rosemary Mellor (Manchester), Roger Silverstone (LSE), Derek Wynne (Manchester Metropolitan University) and Roger Burrows (University of York). Rosemary and Derek have both sadly died since the project began and we would like to think that there are traces of their influence in this study. Paul Joyce helped with data analysis. As the book took shape we have benefited enormously from the conversations and interest of Nick Abercrombie, Lisa Adkins, Stephen Ball, Tony Bennett, Talja Blokland, Tim Butler, Eamonn Carrabine, Garry Crawford, Nick Crossley, Fiona Devine, Rob Flynn, Peter Halfpenny, Sylvia Hayes, Helen Hills, Johs Hjellbrekke, Tony Kearon, Dan Laughey, Patrick Legales, Annemarie Money, Bev Skeggs, Alan Warde, and Paul Watt. We certainly have not been able to satisfy them on all the points they have raised, but we are flattered that from their diverse positions they have wanted to engage with our work. Mike would particularly like to thank Fiona Devine, Bev Skeggs and Alan Warde for helping him to explore many of the issues about class, stratification and culture – often over a congenial glass of wine!
[Page xii]Versions of chapters have been given to the following audiences who we thank for their comments: British Sociological Association Annual Conferences (1997, 1999, 2002); The Legacy of the Frankfurt School in Cultural Studies conference (Salford 1998) Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinarity: Difference, Otherness, Dialogue, Translation conference (Leeds 2000) Cultural Change and Urban Contexts conference (Manchester, Manchester Metropolitan and Salford 2000) Crossroads in Cultural Studies conference (Tampere 2002) the Turkish Oral History Foundation (Istanbul 2003); the Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Essex; Liverpool John Moores University; University of Manchester University of Salford University of Sheffield University of Leicester Open University University of Lancaster and Unilever.
Finally, Mike would like to thank Helen and Isambard for sharing the experience of ‘elective belonging’ in Withington, South Manchester. Gaynor would like to thank Graham, Claire, and Jack for all their support and especially for ‘dancing on a Saturday night’ and her Mum, Doreen for always being there. Brian would like to thank Bernadette, James and Tim for continuing to share it all.
In the late 1960s a group of eminent urban geographers, planners and sociologists associated with the Centre for Environmental Studies listened to a paper examining ‘developing patterns of urbanisation’ (Cowan and Diamond 1969). This provided an account of anticipated urban trends up to the century end, roughly the time when we conducted our interviews. Placing our findings against these expectations reveals how the expectations of 30 years before had largely been confounded. The paper outlined the dominant trend within Britain towards the creation of one large megalopolis. ‘(T)he dominance of London and the associated belt of almost contiguous urban development that stretches to Leeds and Liverpool will increase and the infant megalopolitan heart of Britain will have come to manhood. The currently projected motorway network will become its High Street’. They went on to add that ‘we have to ask if there is still a discernible regional scale’.
This assumption of increased national homogeneity and urban centrality looks very different from the world conjured up by our respondents. The identities and practices we have examined are rooted in northern England. London is a long way away, and even those Chorlton residents who hankered after it did so under the assumption that it was a fundamentally different place than Manchester. However, Cowan and Diamond usefully suggested that four city regions would emerge within the large megalopolis. One of these was an urban corridor running from Merseyside, through Manchester, Bradford, Leeds to Humberside, and with a corridor running north to Preston.1 In this book we have argued that the power of place is defined by a large group of those who ‘electively belong’ to a specific residential location which they can make congruent with their lives. This population is largely drawn from those brought up within this northern corridor (with the exception that few have come from Humberside, but they have in addition come from Newcastle-upon-Tyne, as well as parts of rural northern England and the Midlands), and is a group which challenges the traditional dichotomy between locals and cosmopolitans. The opportunities and scope offered by global communication and mobility has allowed the consolidation of a new kind of regional population, no longer defined with respect to a dominant local city, but with highly selective and partial global ties that create distinctive kinds of imaginary belongings.
This book has therefore been an empirical elaboration of the familiar argument that globalisation constructs local identities, attachments and belonging. However, we have sought to refine our understandings of the [Page 204]precise ways in which this occurs. We have distanced ourselves from any perspective which sees the local as an instance of the global, and have emphasised that it should be seen as an irritant. We do not seek to gloss local distinctiveness behind global generalisations. It is vital to comprehend the particularity of place. In this conclusion we pull together the threads of our analysis to offer our understanding of cultural globalisation in ways that may have broader relevance for other places and locations. We do this by critically reflecting on how our case studies relate to a series of common arguments evident within accounts of globalisation, before concluding with a statement of our own perspective.
In Chapter 1 we positioned our work as a critique of theories of globalisation that saw it as involving epochal social change. Let us indicate four ways in which our account poses serious problems for these kinds of globalisation theory before we elaborate our own alternative view:
An Alternative Approach
- The local as defensive response. In the work of Castells, Beck and Bauman, the local is a defensive response to the increasing general power of globalising forces. It thus reinstates the authenticity of the local as a means of challenging the claims of the global to by-pass place. We, however, see very little evidence that the local is historically constructed in this way as a kind of defensive identity. Indeed, historical claims imparting moral priority to long-term residents are rarely found and have limited significance in any of our areas. Most residents talk about their local belonging in terms of the connections which it allows with other places and its convenience for their everyday life. The local is thoroughly implicated in various kinds of global connection and the local can only be understood as a direct product of these. Theoretically, we see this as offering strong support for networked approaches to place identity, such as those championed by Appadurai (1996) and Massey (1994) which do not counter-pose the local with the global, but explore how specific locals are interconnected to produce a complex range of particular geographies.
- The global as an awareness of the world. From our and a half million words of transcript there is very little evidence that people imbue their narratives of everyday life with some sense of global concern. When talking about their everday lives people do not link their lives to issues of global warming, international relations, or a sense of the world as an arena with a shared destiny. In addition, our respondents had very little cultural contact with much of the world, especially Africa, Latin America, and parts of Asia. Insofar as globalisation is defined as a kind of generic global awareness, we must insist on its empirical limits. Global communications facilitate particular kinds of geographies which appear to reinforce longer term spatial relationships – in our case through elaborating the ties of the former British empire. Although this is theoretically consistent with the arguments of Robertson (1992, 1995) we see it as important to map out the actual kinds of diasporic identities that are fostered, rather than refer to generic ‘global’ identities.[Page 205]
- Global elite versus local mass. Many theorists argue that globalisation has a clear class dimension which sets apart elites from other social groups. Castells distinguishes mobile elites from static populations. Against global flows, Castells emphasises that labour is organised in local settings, without being networked to other places, leading to conflict between global capital and local labour. Labour is thereby forced to use their stasis as a mobilising principle. This view is echoed by Bauman (1998: 19, 21), who writes that ‘Elites travel in space and travel faster than ever before … [but] the rest of the population finds itself cut off forced to pay the heavy cultural, psychological and political price of their new isolation. This kind of account can be seen in the work of Lash and Urry (1994) on the isolation of the underclass, as well as Friedman (1999). However, we see little evidence for this kind of distinction which rests on a crude class determinism. Many of our Wilmslow residents were members of a global corporate elite, yet it is not clear that they are more culturally mobile than respondents in our other three places. It is true that they are more likely to travel abroad with their work and report slightly higher levels of family and friends abroad. However, their cultural tastes are considerably more parochial and ‘national’ than those found in the other areas. They rarely have any developed sense of global reflexivity, and most of them explain their attachment to place in terms of their emotional investment in the north of England, where they were often brought up and have continuing kinship ties. The problem here is in part the remarkably crude distinction between elites and the rest, which is hardly convincing given the abundant evidence for more fine grained and complex differentiation between social groups.2 More fundamentally than this, however, such writers appeal to a crude form of class determinism in order to account for the local, but they lack a theory of class as an integral aspect of contemporary globalisation. It is therefore odd that a writer such as Bauman who has staked his colours to the ‘end of class’ idea should in the end rely on some kind of class analysis – albeit one which has learned nothing from the sophisticated debate about meaning and nature of class relations which has raged in recent years.3 It is not coincidental that those writers who have a class centred interpretation of global social change, such as Sklair (1997), are in fact sceptical of many of the claims of globalisation. Rather than assuming that labour is ‘local’ it is surely crucial to decompose different forms of ‘labour’, learning from the extensive debates about how to understand the nature of the middle classes (e.g. Abercrombie and Urry 1983; Savage et al. 1992; Butler and Savage 1995).
- Locals vs cosmopolitans. If we have achieved one thing in this book, we hope it is to debunk the idea that the distinction between these two groups is of major contemporary significance. We have seen that there are few ‘locals’ who are still living in areas that they were ‘born and bred’, and where such locals do exist (notably in Cheadle) they often feel they do not belong but rather think of themselves as marginal. The weakness of these locals allows us also rethink cosmopolitan identities [Page 206]in different ways to Hannerz (1996), Urry (2002) and Beck (2002), who see cosmopolitans in terms of ‘their willingness to engage with the other’ (Hannerz 1996: 103). Such accounts fail to register that given the limits of distinctively ‘local’ cultures, this willingness takes a particularly self-referential form, in which people seek security through identifying with other similar places. When distinctive local cultures can be detected, cosmopolitans can identify themselves in relation to them. This point is indeed made by Hannerz (1996) Beck (2002) and Urry (2002: 137), but they then fail to realise that when local cultures dissipate, the cosmopolitan project loses clear terms of reference, since it can no longer define itself against a bounded ‘other’. Instead, it appears to become a search for reassurance which seeks sustenance through reference to ‘other’ similar cultures. Its dialogical qualities therefore have clear limits. Thus, Urry's (2002: 137) portrait of a cosmopolitan fluidity which involves ‘the capacity to live simultaneously in both the global and the local, in the distant and proximate, in the universal and particular’ fails to recognise that the ‘global’ becomes identified with other cosmopolitan ‘proximates’ (London), and that globalising processes actually lead to a circular frame of cosmopolitan reference in which encounters with the ‘non-culturally privileged other’ are foreclosed. We have traced the significance of this self-referential cosmopolitanism especially with respect to our Chorlton residents. This group claims a cosmopolitan identity, yet it is one that in some respects effaces the ‘other’. Its members have little to do, practically, with local residents, and they have little awareness of the significance of other social groups living in the area. They are attracted to the idea of appreciating global cultures yet their actual cultural reference points show very little engagement with cultures outside the English speaking metropolises. They have intense local knowledge of the area and often moved to the place because of their range of face-to-face social contacts in the area. In short, they do not empirically sustain the kinds of claims that Beck (2002: 27), for instance makes of them in which cosmopolitanism is ‘an imagination of a globally shared collective future’. Nor does this account support the arguments of Urry, Bauman and Turner that cosmopolitanism can be seen as related to ‘irony’ and distance from place. In fact, Chorlton cosmopolitans are highly at home in their surrounds and often have a dense range of social contacts near where they live. Emprically ‘actually existing cosmopolitans’ do not seem to redeem the hope placed on them by contemporary social theorists.
We are now in a position to lay out our alternative approach to understanding the dynamics of globalisation and belonging. This can most easily be done in the form of a series of points:[Page 207]
- The precise form and nature of global connections depends strongly on the precise field of practice that is being studied. Rather than an epochal shift from a modern to global society, we need to recognise that fields vary in their spatial extension and scope. Some of these fields – for instance music and cinema – deploy IT to permit considerable spatial extension, yet other fields, notably that of residence, do not. Despite the claims of some postmodern theorists that we are witnessing the de-differentiation of fields (Lash 1990) we argued in Chapter 6 that fields are clearly differentiated from one another, with social networks of residence, work, and friendship rarely overlapping. We are not in a position to assess whether these findings are new, since we have no historical data, but we would argue that our interpretation is consistent with a view that current globalisation is at best a deepening of long-term trends towards social differentiation.
- Within these differentiated fields, residential space is a key arena in which respondents define their social position. If only because it remains rare to have multiple residences, residence plays an increasingly important role vis-à-vis other fields in defining one's own sense of social location. In addition, residential space is crucial also in allowing people access to other fields, such as that of education, employment, and various cultural fields. One's residence is a crucial, possibly the crucial, identifier of who you are. The sorting processes by which people chose to live in certain places and others leave is at the heart of contemporary battles over social distinction. Rather than seeing wider social identities as arising out of the field of employment it would be more promising to examine their relationship to residential location.
- Places are defined not as historical residues of the local, or simply as sites where one happens to live, but as sites chosen by particular social groups wishing to announce their identities. While retaining the traditional Chicago school emphasis on urban space as a habitat, we argue that places offer visions of living which do not depend on the character of face-to-face relationships, or the historical character of the place. In all four areas there are striking congruences between the capitals of the residents and their sense of feeling at home. Chorlton appeals to those with cultural capital and moderate amounts of economic capital. Wilmslow appeals to those with large amounts of economic capital and moderate amounts of cultural capital, while Ramsbottom is favoured by the upwardly mobile without large amounts of cultural capital.
- Elective belonging involves people moving to a place and putting down roots. It evokes a distinctive form of temporality suspended between the ‘glacial time’ of long-term history, and the instantaneous time of the present through the way that people identify a moment when they commit to a place. People feel they belong when they are able to biographically make sense of their decision to move to a particular place, and their sense of belonging is hence linked to this contingent tie between themselves and their surrounds. We see the concept of elective belonging as preferable to that of ‘outside belonging’ (Probyn 1996) since the latter depends for [Page 208]its analytical power on an alternative notion of ‘inside belonging’ which is largely absent. Elective belonging is a way of dealing, at the personal level with people's relative fixity in local routines of work, household relationships, and leisure on the one hand, and the mobility of their cultural imaginations on the other. Most respondents were embedded in their place of residence, and few could easily ‘up sticks’. However, people routinely invoked a networked sense of place, comparing their locations with those that were meaningful and important to them through the infrastructure of global communications – tourism, the media, and so forth. We see these findings as exemplifying Appadurai's (1996) arguments concerning the significance of the organisation of the imagination, as well as Tomlinson's (1997) emphasis that globalisation is significant not so much in allowing new forms of mobility but in transforming places.
- Identities are developed through the networked geography of places articulated together. In our research these can be seen to operate at a variety of spatial scales. Most globally, we have detected a white, Anglophone diaspora. Here respondents feel at home among the cultural values and objects of English, American and (to a much lesser extent) Australian and Canadian nations. Reference is occasionally made to cultures outside these zones, but they are nearly always seen as ‘difficult’ or ‘exceptional’. Less powerful, and to some extent cutting across this, there are networks of global urban spaces, concentrating especially on the connections (or lack of) between Manchester and London, but sometimes extending into comparisons with other world cities, mostly in Europe. Thirdly, there is a powerful regional cultural geography enmeshed in our respondents' identities. The specific places to which they have moved offer a distinctive location within the north of England. The regional level is especially important since it is often within the broadly defined north (rather than the local level) that respondents have kinship ties and emotional connections. One of the striking and largely unexpected findings from our research is the limited significance of the national frame of reference in people's cultural imaginaries. Many of our respondents can be seen as being part of a ‘northern English white middle class’.
These five points are all anchored in the empirical findings of our book but, we contend, offer an approach which might have application elsewhere. However, this is for others to judge.Notes
1 The other three city regions were expected to be (a) the South East, with corridors running east to Ipswich, north to Northampton, west to Swindon, and south to Portsmouth and Southampton, (b) Severnside, running from Bristol west to Swansea, north to Gloucester and east to Bath and (c) the Midlands.
2 The use of the concept of elite, rather than class, is of course instructive here.
3 Examples of such work debates are to be found in Scott 1996, Crompton 1998, Crompton et al. 2000, Devine et al. 2003.
Appendix: List of Interviews[Page 209][Page 210]Cheadle Area[Page 211]Chorlton Area[Page 212][Page 213]Ramsbottom Area[Page 214]Wilmslow Area
References[Page 215]2000) Time Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1998) Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222331and (1983) Capital, Labour and the Middle Classes. London: Allen and Unwin.and (1968) The Origins of British Sociology, 1834–1914: An Essay:Chicago, Chicago University Press.(Adams, R. and Allan, G. (eds) (1998) Placing Friendship in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2002) Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late Modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.(1996) The Global Age, Cambridge: Polity.(1997) ‘Travelling beyond local cultures’, in J.Eade (ed.) Living the Global City, London: Routledge. pp. 37–55.(1979) A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: Allen and Unwin.(2003) Lost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwells. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470773321(2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity.and (1983) Imagined Community. London: Verso.(1995) Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen.(1993) ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’ in B.Robins (ed.) The Phantom Public Sphere. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.(1996) Modernity at Large. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.(1998) ‘Agglomeration and the location of economic activity’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14 (2): 18–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18(1995) Non-places: Introduction to the anthropology of hyper-modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.(1996) New Ethnicities and Urban Culture: Racisms and Multiculture in Young Lives. London: UCL Press.(1992) Enterprising Women: Television Fandom and the Creation of Popular Myth. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.(1996) ‘Consuming the past’ in S.Edgell, K.Hetherington and A.Warde (eds) Consumption Matters. Oxford: Blackwell.(1998) ‘Mapping the museum: the cultural consumption and production of two north west heritage sites. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Salford.(2003) Children, Belonging and Social Capital: The PTA and Middle Class Narratives of Social Involvement in the North-West of England, Sociological Research on Line., and (2002) Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage. London: Routledge Falmer.(1998) ‘I heard it on the grapevine: hot knowledge and school choice’, British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 19 (3): 377–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142569980190307and (1995) ‘Circuits of schooling a sociological exploration of parental choice in social class contexts’, Sociological Review, 43: 52–78., and ([Page 216]2004) Health Inequalities. London: Sage.(1988) Selected Writings. Cambridge: Polity.(1989) Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity and the Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) Globalisation: The Human Consequences. Oxford: Blackwell.(1991) The Moral Order of a Suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.(2000) What is Globalization?Cambridge: Polity.(2002. ‘The cosmopolitan society and its enemies’, Theory, Culture and Society19: 17–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276021289312061995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity.and (1968) Middle Class Families: Social and Geographical Mobility. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203001462(1996) Habits of the Heart,, , , and (2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.1973) Illuminations. London: Fontana.(1999) The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2000) Accounting for Taste: Australian Everyday Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., and (1983) All That is Solid Melts into Air. London: Verso.(2004) ‘Cosmopolitan knowledge and the production and consumption of sexualised space: Manchester's gay village’, Sociological Review, 52 (1): 39–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00441.xand (2002) ‘“Ordinary people come through here”: locating the beauty salon in women's lives’, Feminist Review, 71: 2–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400024(2001) ‘Men are real, women are “made up”: beauty therapy and the construction of femininity’, Sociological Review, 49 (1): 100–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sore.2001.49.issue-1and (2003) Urban Bonds. Cambridge: Polity.(1957) Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. London: Tavistock.(1977) ‘Cultural reproduction and social reproduction’, in J.Karabel and A.H.Halsey (eds) Power and Ideology in Education. New York: Oxford University Press.(1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1987) ‘What makes a social class: on the theoretical and practical existence of groups’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32: 1–18.(1996) The State Nobility. Cambridge: Polity.(1997) ‘The forms of capital’, in A.H.Halsey, H.Lauder, P.Brown, and A.S.Wells (eds) Education: Culture, Economy, Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1998) Practical Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1999a) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.(1999b) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.(1999c) ‘The social conditions of the international circulation of ideas’, in R.Shusterman (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.(1973) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.and (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.and (1999) ‘On the cunning of imperialist wisdom’, Theory, Culture and Society, 16: 41–58.and (1985) Just Looking: Consumer Culture in Dreiser, Gissing and Zola. New York: Methuen.(1996) Children in Families: Research and Policy. London: Falmer Press.and (2000) ‘The urban question as a scale question: reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24: 361–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijur.2000.24.issue-2(1991) ‘Satellite dishes and the landscapes of taste’, New Formations, 15: 23–42.([Page 217]1996) ‘“Anything but heavy metal”: symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes’, American Sociological Review, 61: 884–899. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096459(2002) Working Capital: Life and Labour in Contemporary London. London: Routledge., , , and (1989) The Dialectics of Seeing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1986) Neighbours: The Work of Philip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(2000) Sounding Out the City. Oxford: Berg.(1991) Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.et al. (2000) Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. Berkeley: University of California Press., , , , , , , , and (2003a) London Calling. Avebury: Ashgate.and (2003b) ‘Plotting the middle classes: gentrification and circuits of education in London’, Housing Studies, 18 (1): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267303032000076812and (Butler, T. and Savage, M. (eds) (1995) Social Change and the Middle Classes. London: UCL Press.2003) ‘The class consciousness of frequent travellers: towards a critique of actually existing cosmopolitanism’, in Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 86–109.(1999) ‘Mosiacs of omnivorousness: suburban youth and popular music’, New Formations, 38: 125–140.and (1997) The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1996a) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwells.(1996b) The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwells.(1997) The End of the Millennium, Oxford, Blackwells.(2002) ‘Conclusion: urban sociology in the twenty first century’, in I.Susser (ed.) The Castells Reader on Cities and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwells.(1998) Walter Benjamin: The Colour of Experience. London: Routledge.(1996), Lifestyles. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203137468(Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. (eds) (1998) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Writing the Rural: Five Cultural Geographies. London: Paul Chapman.et al.Cohen, A.P. (ed.) (1982) Belonging: Identity and Social Organization in British Rural Communities. Manchester: Manchester University Press.1985) The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: Tavistock. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203323373(1997) Global Dispora, London, UCL Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203228920(1997) The Sociology of Consumption. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216903(1996) ‘Landscape and identity at Ladybower Reservoir and Rutland Water’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 534–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/622595, , (1969) ‘Emerging trends in urbanisation’, copy found in box 14/1, Ray Pahl collection, Qualidata Archive: University of Essex.and (1998) Class and Stratification,(2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwells.2000) Renewing Class Analysis. Oxford: Blackwells., , , (2001) The Social Body. Cambridge: Polity.(1994) Community Life. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.and (2002) ‘Community studies: fifty years of theorisation’, Sociological Research Online, 7: 3http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/3/crow.htmlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.742(2002). ‘Neither busybodies nor nobodies: managing proximity and distance in neighbouring relations’, Sociology, 36: 127–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036001007and (2002) Managing Retail Consumption. Chichester: John Wiley.and (1984) City of Quartz. London: Verso.(2000) The Postmodern Urban Condition. Oxford: Blackwells.([Page 218]1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2000) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489433(1986) All Work and No Play? The Sociology of Women and Leisure. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(1957) Coal is our Life. London: Tavistock.and (1992) Affluent Workers Revisited. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.(2000) ‘Professional work and professional careers in Manchester's business and financial sector’, Work, Employment and Society, 14 (3): 521–540., , and (Devine, F., Savage, M., Crompton, R., Scott, J. (eds) (2004) Class and Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.1999) ‘Can there be a science of existential structure and social meaning?’, in R.Shusterman (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwells.and (1994) ‘Ethnographic enigmas: “the everyday” in recent media studies’, Cultural Studies, 8 (2): 341–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502389400490491(1996) Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221945(2002) ‘Geographies of Family Formation: spatial differences and gender cultures in Britain’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27 (4): 471–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tran.2002.27.issue-4and (Eade, J. (ed.) (1996) Living the Global City. London: Routledge.2000) Born and Bred. Oxford: Clarendon.(1965) The Established and the Outsiders. London: Frank Cass.and (1996) ‘Culture, class and connections’, American Journal of Sociology, 102 (1): 217–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1996.102.issue-1(1992) The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon.and (Evans, G. (ed.) (1999) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.1997) The Shopping Experience. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216972and (1992) ‘The heroic life and everyday life’, Theory, Culture and Society, Feb, 159–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327692009001009(1995) ‘Introduction’ in Featherstone et al. (eds) Global Modernities, London: Sage. pp. 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563and (1995) Global Modernities. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563, , (2003) ‘Four cosmopolitan moments’, in Vertovec and Cohen (eds) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 137–62.and (1998), Tales of the City. London: Routledge.(1982) To Dwell Amongst Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1989) Reading the Popular. London: Unwin Hyman.(2000) Migrant Belongings. Oxford: Berg.(1997) Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250464(1957) Village on the Border. London: Cohen and West.(1966) Communities in Britain. London: Penguin.(1993) White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness. London: Routledge.(2000) Global Nature, Global Culture. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219768, and (1999) ‘Unpicking political communitarianism: a critique of “the communitarian family”’, in G.Jagger and C.Wright (eds) Changing Family Values. London: Routledge.(1999) ‘Reading Castells: zeitdiagnose and social theory’, Society and Space, 17: 111–120.(1982) ‘World city formation: an agenda for research and action’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6: 309–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijur.1982.6.issue-3and (1985), Fragments of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwells.(1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.([Page 219]1962) The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian Americans. New York: Free Press.(2000) Critiques of Everyday Life. London: Routledge.(1989), Consuming Passion: The Rise of Retail Culture. London: Unwin Hyman.and (1999) TV Living: Televison, Culture and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.and (1973) The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Heinemann.(1990) The Condition of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.(1991) Intimacy and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.(1995) Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. London: Routledge.(1996) Myth and Metropolis: Walter Benjamin and theCity Cambridge: Polity.(1993) The Black Atlantic. London: Verso.(2002) ‘Economic transitions: restructuring local labour markets’, in J.Peck and K.Ward (eds) City of Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 50–75.and (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.and (1990) Women's Leisure, What Leisure?. Basingstoke: Macmillan., and (1994) ‘Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline’, Sociology, 28 (2): 479–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038594028002007(1973) ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1973.78.issue-6(1995) ‘Too much work?, class, gender and the reconstitution of middle class domestic labour’, in T.Butler and M.Savage (eds) Social Change and the Middle Classes. London: UCL Press.and (1998) A Profile of Poverty and Health in Manchester. Manchester: Manchester Health Authority and Manchester City Council.(1997) Gender, Careers and Organization: Recent Developments in Banking, Local Authorities and Nursing. Basingstoke: Macmillan., , (1998) Cities in Civilisation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.(Hall, S. and Jefferson, T. (eds) (1976) Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Sub-Cultures in Post-War Britain. London: Hutchinson.1980) Origins and Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon., , (1996) Transnational Connections: Cultures, People, Places. London: Routledge.(1997) Hulme City Challenge: did it work. Liverpool European Institute for Urban Affairs.(1990) The Outer City. London: Edward Arnold.(1982) The Limits to Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1985) ‘The spatial fix’, in D.Gregory and J.Urry (eds) Social Relations and Spatial Structures. Basingstoke: MacMillan.(1987) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwells.(1993) ‘From space to place and back again’, in J.Bird et al. (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge.(1993) The Factory and the City: The Story of the Cowley Automobile Workers in Oxford. London: Mansell.and (2001) ‘Ilegitimate subjects? abject whites, neoliberal modernisation and middle class multi-culturalism’, Society and Space, 19: 351–370.(1985) How Britain Votes. Oxford: Clarendon., and (1991) Understanding Political Change: The British Voter, 1964–1987. Oxford: Pergamon., , , and (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity.(1999) Global Transformations. Cambridge: Polity., , and (1995) Reading Women's Magazines. Oxford: Polity.([Page 220]1997) Badlands of Modernity. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203428870(2000) ‘After networks’, Society and Space, 18 (2): 127–132.and (2000) ‘Half-forgotten streets: architecture and amnesia in Manchester’ in N.Rudd (ed.) Fabrications: new art and urban memory in Manchester. Manchester: UMiM, pp. 32–39.and (2002) ‘The fetishised past; post-industrial Manchester and intersticial spaces’, Visual Culture in Britain, 3 (2): 103–18.and (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.(1957) The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working Class Life with Special Reference to Publications and Entertainment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1991) Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.(1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.(1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge.(1992) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.(2003) The Rule of Freedom. London: Verso.(2001), Older People and Fear of Crime: Towards an Understanding of the Roles of Social Networks and the Impact of the Media, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Salford.(1993), Manchester, Keele: Ryburn.(2000) ‘New directors, customers and fans: the transformation of English football in the 1990s’, Sociology of Sport Journal, 14 (3): 576–593.(1995) The Mass Ornament. Harvard: Harvard University Press.(1991) Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1995) Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1978) Prophecy and Progress. London. Penguin.(2003) The Making of English National Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550058(1992) Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2002) ‘Ordinary cosmopolitanism: strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working class men’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19: 1–27.and (1995) Revolt of the Elites and Betrayal of Democracy. New York: Norton.(1990) The Sociology of Postmodernism. London: Routledge.(2002) Critique of Information. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217283(1987) The End of Organised Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.and (1994) Economies of Signs and Spaces. London: Sage.and (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1993) New Strategies in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity.(2002) European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance. Oxford: Blackwells. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243570.001.0001(1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwells.(1996) ‘Social class, consumption, and the influence of Bourdieu: some critical issues’, in S.Edgell, K.Hetherington and A.Warde (eds) Consumption Matters. Oxford: Blackwells.and (2001) ‘Ordinary consumption and personal identity: radio and the middle classes in the north west of England’, in A.Warde and J.Gronow (eds) Ordinary Consumption. London: Routledge., and (2004) ‘Audiences, museums and the English middle class’, Museum and Society, in press., and (2000) Social Structure. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.and (Lull, J. (ed.) (1988) World Families Watch Television. London: Sage.1990) Inside Family Viewing. London: Routledge.(1997) Consumer Culture. Cambridge: Polity.(2003) ‘The game of loyal(o)y diversions and divisions in network society’, Sociological Review, 51 (3): 301–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00422(1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.([Page 221]1999). ‘Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity’, Theory, Culture and Society, 16: 95–117.(1998) British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry?London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203168011(1997) Against the Odds: Social Class and Social Justice in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198292401.001.0001, and (1996) Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.(1984) Spatial Divisions of Labour. Basingstoke: Macmillan.(1993) ‘Power geometry and a progressive sense of place’, in J.Bird et al. (eds) Mapping the Futures, Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge.(1994), Space, Class and Gender. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) Landscape and Englishness. London: Reaktion.(2001) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(1997) ‘Negotiating the gnome zone: versions of suburbia in British popular culture’, in R.Silverstone (ed.) Visions of Suburbia. London: Routldge.(2002) ‘Hypocritical city: cycles of urban exclusion’, in J.Peck and K.Ward (eds) City of Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.(1985) No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press.(1995) Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies. London: Routledge.(1998) A Theory of Shopping. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) Shopping Place and Identity. London: Routledge., , , and (1995) ‘Land, landscape, and the question of culture: English urban hegemony and research needs’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 8, 1, 94–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/johs.1995.8.issue-1(1951) White Collar. New York: Oxford University Press.(2000) Captive State: The Corporate Take Over of Britain. London: Pan.(2003) Consumption in the Home: Cultural Capital, Family Gift Cultures and Place, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Salford.(1996) Satellite Television and Everyday Life: Articulating Technology, (2000) Media and Everyday Life in Modern Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.(1986) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London: Comedia.(2000) Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Migrancy. London: Routledge.(1990) Class, Sect and Party: The Making of the British Middle Class. Manchester: Manchester University Press.(1990) ‘Clubs, societies and associations’, in F.M.L.Thompson (ed.) The Cambridge Social History of Britain, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1998) ‘Belonging on the move: market rhetoric and the future as obligatory passage’, Sociological Review, 46 (2): 208–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sore.1998.46.issue-2(1980) Green and Pleasant Land? Social Change in Rural England. Harmondworth: Penguin.(1953) The Quest for Community. London: Oxford University Press.(1996) ‘Left loafing: city cultures and postmodern lifestyles’, in O'ConnorJ. and Wynne, D.From the Margins to the Centre: Cultural production and consumption in the post-industrial city. Aldershot: Arena.and (1971) Managers and Their Wives. London: Penguin.and (1965) Urbs in Rure. London: LSE, Geographical Papers.(1970) Patterns of Urban Life. London: Longman.(2000) On Friendship. Cambridge: Polity.(2000) The Turbulence of Migration. Cambridge: Polity.(1976) The Sociology of Leisure. London: Allen and Unwin.(1983) Leisure and Work. London: Allen and Unwin.(1999) The English: A Portrait of a People. London: Penguin.(1994) ‘Searching for a new institutional fix: The after fordist crisis and global-local disorder’, in A.Amin (ed.) Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwells.and ([Page 222]1995) ‘Business goes local: dissecting the business agenda in Manchester’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19: 55–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijur.1995.19.issue-1and (Peck, J. and Ward, K. (eds) (2002) City of Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.1992) ‘Feminism, psychoanalysis and the study of popular culture’ in L.Grossberg, C.Nelson and P.Treichler (eds) Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.(1996) ‘Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore’, American Sociological Review, 61: 900–907. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096460and (1995) ‘The new middle classes and social constructs of rural living’, in T.Butler and M.Savage (eds) Social Change and the Middle Classes. London: UCL press.et al. (1978) The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. London: Hutchinson.(1995) Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation 1830–1864. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2003) Education and the Middle Class. Buckingham: Open University Press.and (1996) Outside Belongings. New York: Routledge.(2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Touchstone.(1998) ‘Manchester first: from municipal socialism to the entrepreneurial city’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24: 601–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00267(2002) ‘Entrepreneurial turns: muncipal socialism and after’, in J.Peck and K.Ward (eds) City of Revolution, Manchester: Manchester University Press.(1995) ‘Leisure and the family life cycle’, in CCritcher, P.Bramham and A.Tomlinson (eds) Sociology of Leisure: A Reader. London: E & F N Spon.and (2000) ‘A useful extension of Bourdieu's conceptual framework? emotional capital as a way of understanding mothers' involvement in their children's education’, Sociological Review, 48 (4): 568–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sore.2000.48.issue-4(2003) ‘The limits of “Choice”: children and inner city schooling’, Sociology, 37 (1): 121–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037001389and (Regional Trends 36 (2001) London: HMSO.2000) ‘Moral tales of the child and the adult: Narratives of contemporary family lives under changing circumstances’Sociology, 34 (4): 785–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003803850000047X, and (2001) ‘The village of the liberal-managerial class’, in V.Dharwadker (ed.) Cosmopolitan Geographies: New Locations in Literature and Culture. New York: Routledge.(1971) The Classic Slum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1995) ‘Work and its corollaries’, in CCritcher, P.Bramham and A.Tomlinson (eds) Sociology of Leisure: A Reader. London: E & F N Spon.(1999) Leisure in Contemporary Society. Wallingford: CABI.(1992) Globalisation. London: Sage.(1995) ‘Glocalisation: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity’, in M.Featherstone, S.Lash and R.Robertson (eds) Global Modernities. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563(2002) ‘Mancunian ways: the politics of regeneration’, in J.Peck and K.Ward (eds).(2001) ‘Coming to terms with London: Middle class communities in a global city’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (1): 70–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-1and (1991) The Wages of Whiteness. London: Verso.(1995) Decentering Leisure Theory. London: Sage.(2001) The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes. Yale: Yale University Press.(1998) ‘Country visiting: a memoir’, in R.Samuel, Island Stories: Unravelling Memory. London: Verso.(1991) The Global City. London: Routledge.(1995) ‘Walter Benjamin's urban thought: A critical analysis’, Society and Space, 13: 201–216.(1999) ‘Sociology class and male manual work cultures’, in J.McIlroyN.Fishman, and A.Campbell (eds) British Trade Unions and Industrial Politics: The High Tide of Trade Unionism, 1964–1979. Aldershot: Ashgate.([Page 223]2000) Class Analysis and Social Transformation. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(2005) ‘Bureaucracy and social capital’, in P.du Gay (ed.) The valuer of Bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2001) ‘Ordinary ambivalent and defensive: Class identities in the north west of England’, Sociology, 35 (4): 875–892., , (2004a) ‘The comforts of place: Belonging and identity in the north-west of England’, in T.Bennett and E.Silva (eds) Everyday Cultures. London: Sociology Press., , (2004b) ‘Local habitus and working class culture’, in F.Devine, M.Savage, R.Crompton and J.Scott (eds) Rethinking Class. Basingstoke: Palgrave., , (2005) ‘Social capital in suburbia’, in TBlokland and M.Savage (eds) Social Capital on the Ground. Forthcoming., , (1992) Property, Bureaucracy and Culture: Middle Class Formation in Contemporary Britain. London: Routledge., , and (2003) Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity,, and (2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.1992) Method in Social Science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.(1996) Radio, Television and Modern Life. Oxford: Blackwells.(1977) The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.(1996) Stratification and Power. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) ‘Gendered cities: women and public leisure space in the “postmodern city”’, Leisure Studies, 17 (2): 123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026143698375196and (1971) City Close Up. London: Penguin.(1999) The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.(1998) Flesh and Stone: The City in Western Civilization. Allen Lane: London.(1991) Places on the Margin. London: Routledge.(1992) Lifestyle Shopping. London: Routledge.(2000) The Politics of Consumption @ Home: Practices and Dispositions in the Uses of Technologies. Open University: Pavis Papers in Social and Cultural Research, No. 1.(1989) ‘Friendship and trust as moral ideals: an historical approach’, European Journal of Sociology, 30: 274–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600005890(1990) ‘Friendship in commercial society: Eighteenth-century social theory and modern sociology’, American Journal of Sociology, 25: 1474–1504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1990.95.issue-6(2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction,(2nd edition. London: Sage.1994) Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.(Silverstone, R. (ed.) (1997) Visions of Suburbia. London: Routledge.1964) ‘The metropolis and mental life’, in K.Wolff (ed.) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.(1990) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.(2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwells.(2001) Transnational Urbanism. Oxford: Blackwells.(Smith, M.P. and Feagin, J. (eds) (1987) The Capitalist City: Global restructuring and community politics. Oxford: Blackwells.Social Trends 31, (2001) London: HMSO.1989) Postmodern Geographies. London: Verso.(1989) Race and Racism in Contemporary Britain. Basingstoke: MacMillan.(2002) ‘Boundaries of “us” and “them”: class, mobility and identification in a New town’, Sociology, 36 (1): 161–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036001009(1998) ‘Doing democracy up close: culture, power, and communication in community building’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9801800101(2001) Welcome to the Dreamhouse: Popular Media and Postwar Suburbs. Durham and London: Duke University Press.([Page 224]1960) Tradition and Change: A Study of Banbury. London: Oxford University Press.(1975) Power, Persistence and Change: A Second Study of Banbury. London: Routledge., , and (1998) ‘Governance as theory: five propositions’, International Social Science Journal, 155: 17–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issj.1998.50.issue-155(1981) Kinship at the Core: An Anthropology of Elmdon, A Village in the North-West of Essex in the 1960s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1990) After Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1991), Partial Connections. Savage, Maryland, Rowman and Littlefield.(2001) ‘Cultural capital and educational attainment’, Sociology, 35 (4): 893–912.(1997) Culture and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1995) ‘Private homes and public others: an analysis of talk about crime in suburban south Manchester in the mid 1990s’, British Journal of Sociology, 35 (2): 263–285.(1996) A Tale of Two Cities. London: Routledge., , Fraser, P. (Tester, K. (ed.) (1994) The Flaneur. London: Routledge.1976) Science, Class and Society. London: Verso.(1993) ‘Giddens's theory of structuration: A critical appreciation’, Progress in Human Geography, 17 (1): 111–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913259301700109(1997) Globalisation and Culture. Cambridge: Polity.(2003) ‘Interests and identities in cosmopolitan politics’, in S.Vertotec and R.Cohen (eds) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1983) ‘Creativity and the renewal of regional life’, in A.Buttimer (ed.) Creativity and Context: A Seminar Report, Lund.(1995) Science Fiction Audiences: Watching ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘Star Trek’. London: Routledge.and (2002). ‘Cosmopolitan virtue, globalisation and patriotism’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19: 45–65.(2001) Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220689and (1990) The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage.(1995) ‘A middle class countryside?’, in Butler and Savage (eds) Social Change and the Middle Classes. London: UCC Press.(2000) Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.(2002) Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.(Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds) (2003) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2000) ‘The transformation of social classes: from “deproletarianisation” to “individualisation”’, in G.Van Gyes, H.De Witte and P.Pasture (eds) Can Class Still Unite?Aldershot: Ashgate.(2001) ‘Social class and parental agency’, Journal of Education Policy, 16 (4): 347–364.(2001) ‘A market in love? Choosing pre-school childcare’, British Educational Research Journal, 27 (5): 633–651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095799and (2002) ‘Class, culture, and agency: researching parental voice’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 23 (1): 109–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596300220123079and (1997) Consumption, Taste and Food: Cultural Antinomies and Consumer Culture. London: Sage.(1999) ‘Consumption and the problem of variety: cultural omnivorousness, social distinction and eating out’, Sociology, 33: 105–127., and (2000) Eating Out. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488894and (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and (1964) ‘Social mobility and social class in industrial societies’, in M.Glucksmann and F.Devons (eds) Closed Systems and Open Minds. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.(1979) ‘The community question: the intimate networks of east Yorkers’, American Journal of Sociology, 84: 1201–1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ajs.1979.84.issue-5([Page 225]2001) ‘Physical space and cyberspace: the rise of personal networking’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25: 227–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-2(1990) The Migration Process. Oxford: Berg.(2002) Imagined Diasporas among Manchester Muslims: The Public Performance of Pakistani Transnational Identity Politics. Oxford: James Currey.(1957) The Organisation Man. New York: Touchstone.(2002) ‘City building: developing Manchester's core’, in Peck and Ward (eds) City of Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.(1987) Friendship Networks and Social Support. London: Policy Studies Institute.(1982) ‘Broken windows’, The Atlantic Monthly, September, pp. 72–88.and (2001). ‘Toward a network sociality’, Theory, Culture and Society, 18: 51–76.(1998) One Nation, After All: What Middle Class Americans Really Think About God, Country, Family, Racism, Welfare, Immigration, Homosexuality, Work, the Right, the Left and Each Other. New York: Viking.(1987) ‘The invisible flaneuse: Women and the literature of modernity’, in A.Benjamin (ed.) The Problems of Modernity. London: Routledge.(2002) A Virtual Society. Oxford: Blackwell.(1996) Leisure, Lifestyles and the New Middle Class: A case study. London: Routledge.(1996) The Contest for Social Science: Relations and Representations of Gender and Class. London: Rivers Oram.(1957) Family and Kinship in East London. London: Routledge.and (