Family Policy: Constructed Solutions to Family Problems
Publication Year: 2001
“I really enjoyed reading this book and found it to be chock-full of good information. It is well-written and readable.”
– Dorina Noble, Louisiana State University
“The information provided is accurate and certainly very current; a definite strength of the text.”
– Jessica Ziembroski, University of Notre Dame
With so many challenges facing families and governments in the United States today, this is an important time to be thinking about family policy. Respected family policy expert Shirley Zimmerman offers the only single-authored core textbook to provide a comprehensive and coherent introduction to family policy. The application of the frameworks to real life issues in family policy provides the opportunity for students to learn to think conceptually about family policy in relation to family problems. She clearly and cogently guides ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Family Policy: The Emergence of Its Discourse and Knowledge-Producing Activities
- Chapter 2: Family Policy Discourse: The Construction of Family Problems and Their Solutions
- Chapter 3: The Many and Changing Meanings of Family
- Chapter 4: Family Values in the Context of Family Change
- Chapter 5: Attitudes Toward Government, Families, and the Economy
- Chapter 6: Family Policies Constructed at the Federal Level for Selected Years in the 1980s and 1990s
- Chapter 7: The Defense of Marriage Act: The Construction of a Solution or a Problem?
- Chapter 8: States’ Political Cultures and Their Constructed Solutions to Family Problems in the 1990s
Part III: Policy Frameworks: What Accounts for the Policy Solutions That are Constructed to Family Problems?
- Chapter 9: The Institutional Framework: Family Policy as the Outcome of Institutional Arrangements
- Chapter 10: The Rational Choice Framework: The Construction of Family Policy as Rational Choice
- Chapter 11: Incremental Theory and Game Theory: Variations on Policy as Rational Choice in the Construction of Policy Solutions to Family Problems
- Chapter 12: Political Culture Theory: An Alternative to Rational Choice Theory
- Chapter 13: Interest Group Theory and Elite Theory
- Chapter 14: A Systems Perspective
- Chapter 15: Family Systems Theory and Exchange and Choice Theory
- Chapter 16: Symbolic Interactionism and Family Stress Theory: Interpretative Frameworks for Thinking about Family Well-Being
- Chapter 17: Conflict Theory, Feminist Theory, and Cultural Theory
To my family
Copyright © 2001 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Sage Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California
91320 E-mail: email@example.com
Sage Publications Ltd.
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
Greater Kailash I
New Delhi 110 048 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Family policy: Constructed solutions to family problems / by Shirley L. Zimmerman.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Family policy—United States. 2. Family—United States. I. Title.
05 06 07 7 6 5 4 3
Acquiring Editor: Jim Brace-Thompson
Editorial Assistant: Anna Howland
Production Editor: Diane S. Foster
Editorial Assistant: Kathryn Journey
Typesetter/Designer: Tina Hill
Indexer: Molly Hall
Cover Designer: Michelle Lee[Page vii]
There is no such thing as a fixed policy, because policy like all organic entities is always in the making.
Attributed to Lord Salisbury—M. R. D. Foot (1956), British Foreign Policy Since 1898–9[Page viii]
Mapping the Book[Page ix]
This book is about family policy, a topic that fascinates and has fascinated me for a very long time. Family policy is concerned with the problems of families in relation to society, and its goal is the advancement of family well-being. The book is divided into five parts. Part I lays the foundation for the discussion of family policy and is comprised of five chapters. The emergence of family policy discourse and knowledge-producing activities is the focus of Chapter 1. The chapter also includes definitions of family policy and a brief historical review of family policy developments in the United States. Chapter 2 discusses family policy discourse and how language is used in the construction (or the linkage of concepts and ideas) of family problems and their solutions. The problems of families are paramount themes in family policy discourse and are discussed in Chapter 3. Chapters 4 and 5 focus on the many and changing meanings of family; family values in family policy discourse in the context of family change; and attitudes toward government, families, and the economy as central to the construction of policy solutions to family problems.
Part II consists of three chapters and focuses on policy solutions actually constructed to address family problems at state and federal levels—mostly during the 1990s. Some constructions are included from the 1980s for comparison. Chapter 6 deals with family policies constructed at the federal level for selected years in the 1980s and 1990s. Chapter 7 focuses on the congressional debates of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (Defense of Marriage Act, 1996) that reveal the attitudes embedded in its construction as both problem and solution. Chapter 8 focuses on policy solutions constructed in the 1990s by six states with different political cultures (political culture refers to the attitudes held by a population toward government and other people). Data from the 1980s are included for three of the states for comparative purposes.
[Page x]Part III, consisting of six chapters, focuses on policy frameworks or perspectives that readers can use as guides for policy practice. The different frameworks included in the discussion are the institutional framework (Chapter 9), the rational choice framework (Chapter 10), incremental theory and game theory (Chapter 11), political culture theory (Chapter 12), interest group theory and elite theory (Chapter 13), and systems theory (Chapter 14). My intent is to familiarize readers with a range of policy frameworks and theories that I have found useful in trying to understand how policy solutions are constructed and what may account for some constructions and not others. Please note that I use the words conceptual frameworks, theoretical perspectives, theories, and models interchangeably. A model is a pattern of conceptual relationships that in some way imitates, duplicates, or analogously illustrates a pattern of relationships observed in the empirical (real) world (Theodorson & Theodorson, 1969). Broadly, a theory consists of a set of interrelated propositions that provides a conceptual scheme for explaining human behavior and other phenomena. You, the readers, can pick and choose from among the frameworks presented here the one that best fits your questions about a given family policy, either as it is being formulated or constructed or after. You do not have to learn all the frameworks at once, but by knowing where to find them in this book, you can return to them when you want to use one of them to better understand a particular policy problem.
Throughout the book, I provide many examples from newspaper articles to show how the frameworks can be used to analyze the processes involved in constructing policy solutions to family problems. You can do the same thing. Having one or two frameworks in mind, as you are watching TV or attending public meetings or hearings or reading the newspaper, think about the concepts associated with that framework in relation to what you are observing and apply them to your observations, using the words—the concepts—associated with the framework so that they become easy for you to say. In class, I have four or five students break into groups to analyze news articles I have selected for analysis. Invariably, students find the exercise fun and enlightening. At the end of the sessions, the groups submit a summary of their analyses—based on the framework assigned for that day. Everyone is expected to participate in the discussions and to come prepared, having read the assigned framework chapter and accompanying article. Students take turns with various group roles: chair, recorder, observer, and so on. Because so many of the articles in the New York Times report on the processes involved in the construction of policy solutions to family problems as well as the substance of such solutions, I tend to rely on the Times for examples. Even if you are not a subscriber, you can access it via the Internet. But other news sources will do as well.
Part IV of the book focuses on family frameworks that can be used to assess the implications of constructed solutions to family problems for family well-being. It consists of three chapters that include family systems theory and exchange and choice theory (Chapter 15), symbolic interactionism and family stress theory (Chapter 16), and conflict, feminist, and cultural theories (Chapter 17). [Page xi]Each of these conceptual frameworks contains concepts—ideas, language, words—that you can use for thinking about the implications of constructed solutions to family problems. Again, you do not have to learn all the frameworks at first or all at once, but having a range of frameworks from which to choose and knowing where to find them when you want or need to use them will give you flexibility in assigning meaning to family problems and their solutions.
Again, I include many examples of the major concepts associated with the different family frameworks in the text. And as with the policy frameworks, I select news articles for students to analyze in small groups in class that are illustrative of the different family frameworks. Students break into small groups to analyze the news article that is illustrative of both a family problem and a policy solution or a family problem in need of a solution, find examples from the article that illustrate the concepts associated with the framework, and base their conclusions on evidence drawn from the news article. In other words, students are expected to assign meaning to the news article in terms of family well-being based on the framework in use for that day, drawing on the news article for evidence. The application of the frameworks to real life encourages students to think conceptually about family policy in relation to family problems and, at the same time, to learn about the issues that constitute and confront family policy. I design all assignments and exams to reinforce conceptual thinking about the policy/family connection and to transform students into a public interested in and informed about family policy and with an appreciation of the connections between family policies and their own lives.
Part V consists of just two chapters. Chapter 18 sums up the discussion in the context of postmodernism and the globalization of the economy, and Chapter 19 offers some suggestions for family policy practice, using the policy frameworks as guides. Here, much depends on your particular role and position in the policy structure, but at the very least, you as citizens have a role to play in this process if only by engaging in family policy discourse. Again, some of the policy frameworks can give you insights into that role—and the language for understanding and performing it. The same applies to the family frameworks, which provide the language for understanding the goal and substance of policy efforts.
Some of you may wonder about the inclusion of so many frameworks in the book, perhaps finding the range overwhelming. Speaking out of my own experience, when I was a student, I was not taught to think conceptually and therefore did not have the language for engaging in discourse about family problems and policies—at least not beyond the average layperson. Once I learned about the frameworks, my ability to analyze and interpret family policies from a family perspective increased enormously. The frameworks allowed me to not only place my observations in a larger context but also to assign meaning to my observations in ways I had not known before. Moreover, they heightened my interest in family policy—and in other subject matters as well. I hope they do the same for you.
I have placed the overall discussion in the context of postmodernism, because just as postmodernism emphasizes language and meaning, my discussion here [Page xii]does too. Some of you may find this material confusing or think it obscures more than it enlightens. The language of postmodernism is different, but like the frameworks that form a large part of the text, the language of postmodernism is sensitizing; it can sensitize you to developments that may be unsettling at worst or baffling at best. This is an exciting time to be thinking about family policy and engaged in its discourse. It is the beginning of a new decade, a new century, a new millennium—and also a new presidential era. There probably is no better time to learn about family policy and its goal of family well-being.
At this point, I would like to thank three anonymous reviewers, two of whom provided very detailed and helpful suggestions for clarifying what I am trying to communicate to you. I took their suggestions seriously and incorporated many of them. I do not know who they are, but I would like them to know how much I appreciate the time and thought they gave to their reviews of the draft they read of the book.
Thank you, again, Pete (my spouse), for your support and understanding of my single-mindedness in working to complete the project, especially in the face of time pressures for manuscript submission. Also thank you, Jim Brace-Thompson, editor, and Sage Publications for giving me a way of engaging in family policy discourse and sharing my ideas with others. And thank you to my colleagues in Family Social Science at the University of Minnesota for listening to my complaints and commiserating with me as I worked on the book. And of course, thank you to my family—my husband Pete, my children, children-in-law, grandchildren, extended family, and special friends who have made me appreciate what family and friends are all about.
If readers are still confused about the meaning of postmodernism, they have only to consider the 2000 presidential election, the ambiguity, uncertainty, and ambivalence characterizing its results being the very hallmarks of postmodernism. Although Al Gore had won the popular vote, it was the electoral vote that mattered, as, we all learned, it does in all presidential elections. The difference between the 2000 presidential election and most other such elections was the closeness of the electoral vote and the ambiguities surrounding the election process itself, particularly in the state of Florida, where the outcome of the election remained highly uncertain long after the election was over. In the end, George W. Bush prevailed and became the next and 43rd president of the United States.
As to what George W. Bush's presidency might mean for families and family policy, you, the readers, will have to judge for yourselves, ideally by assessing the family implications of his proposals and the legislation he signs off on and using one of the family frameworks presented in this book to do so. We can assume, given earlier discussion about the processes involved in the making of family policy, that radical departures from existing policies are highly unlikely, especially in the context of the closeness of the election, the 50/50 party split in the Senate, and the almost 50/50 party split in the House. On the basis of his speeches during the presidential campaign, however, George W. Bush's policy approach to families is likely to be more implicit than explicit, especially when compared to what Al Gore's approach might have been had he prevailed in the election. Whereas Gore mentioned family and family-related words 29 times in his acceptance speech for his party's nomination for president, Bush used such words only 11 times in his acceptance speech for his nomination for president, not counting references to his family of origin and family of procreation.
[Page 390]That language is important in mirroring and shaping people's cognitive structures, that is, how they think and what they do in terms of family policy, was illustrated in a December 2000 discussion about a highly controversial issue, school vouchers. Indeed, Senator Trent Lott, Senate majority leader, ventured to remark in that discussion that the word voucher was part of the problem in addressing problems related to the education of the nation's children (Wilgoren, 2000). A linguistic cue, vouchers involve the use of public money for private school tuition. As a consequence of the strong emotional responses the term evokes, school voucher advocates considered changing their strategy to stage a broader philosophical attack on the way public education has been run in this country for a century and avoiding use of the term voucher, which they said was loaded. Thus far, studies on the effects of vouchers on student performance and their impact on local public schools—have produced mixed results (which, parenthetically, like the election, is also in keeping with postmodernism).
Armed with knowledge of the family and policy frameworks and the history of American social and family policy in the United States and the values that policy choices such as school vouchers and similar changes would reflect, you, the readers, will understand what is at stake in issues advocates would like to obscure, and act accordingly.
References[Page 391][Page 406]1994) Introduction. In H.J.Aaron, T.E.Mann, & T.Taylor (Eds.), Values and public policy (pp. 1–15). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution., , & (1999, Winter). Should we retire Social Security?Brookings Review, 6–11., & (1987) The development of ethnic self-identification and attitudes. In J.S.Phinney & M.J.Rotheram (Eds.), Children's ethnic socialization: Pluralism and development (pp. 32–55). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(Adams v. Howerton, 486 F. Supp. 1119 (CD). 1980).1971). The essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.(1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press., & (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1998, February 12). A conservative battles corporate health care. New York Times, p. A10.(The American ethnic experience as it stands in the nineties (1998, February-March). Public Perspective, 9(2), 50–65.Americans on parenting (1999, October-November). Public Perspective, 10(6), 18.1995, Spring). The components of family policy education. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 16(1), 65–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02353667, & (1986) Dysfunctional intact families and stepfamihes. Family Process, 25, 407–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00407.x, & (1999, October 8). A new Swedish prosperity even with a welfare state. New York Times, p. A1.(1976). Social indicators of well-being: American's perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5, & (2000, August 22). Do races differ? Not really, genes show. New York Times, p. D1.(1994, June 23). Anti-gay act splits family of an official. New York Times, p. A11.(1999, July 11). For better or worse, poverty's poster child. New York Times, p. Wk. 3.(1989). Postmodernism and politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.(Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P 2d 44 (Ha Sup Ct 1993).1996, August). A paradigm of family transcendence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 541–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353715, & (Bailyn, B. (Ed.). (1993). The Debate on the Constitution. New York: Library of America.[Page 392]Baker v. Nelson, 191 NW 2d 185 (Minn 1971).1905, April 15) Family desertion and non-support laws. Charities, 14(3), 650–655.(1996, November-December). A secure system. The American Prospect, 34–35.(1989). The almanac of American politics 1989. Washington, DC: National Journal., & (1997). The almanac of American politics 1998. Washington, DC: National Journal., & (1999). The almanac of American politics 2000. Washington, DC: National Journal., & (1992, November 16). Hillary Clinton's new role: A spouse or policy leader?New York Times, p. A1.(Behind a 15 year old's decision to forego medical treatment (1994, June 13). New York Times, p. A7.Belief in America's Promise (1996, February-March). Public Perspective, 7(2), 34–35.1994, May 9). Graduates confront shifting definition of success. Star Tribune, p. A1.(1994, February 20). Tides that brought Democrats to GOP have turned. New York Times, p. E3.(1995. January 1). Epic political realignments often aren't. New York Times, p. E3.(1989, November). The family realm: Theoretical contributions for understanding its uniqueness. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 51, 805–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352178E, , , & (1993, May 10). Like citizens, officials often tear their hair. Star Tribune, p. 8A.(1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.(1999). Ambiguous loss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1999, April-May). Living happily ever after: Marriage under the microscope. Public Perspective, 10(3), 35–40.(1995, August 13). All she has, $150,000, is going to a university. New York Times, p. A1.(1905, April 15). Broken families. Charities, 14(3), 665–670.(1993) Development issues in Stepfamilies Research Project: Family relationships and parent-child interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), 7–17., & (1996, October 20). American democratic institutions and social values. Paper presented at a conference on Social Values and Public Policy, Washington, DC, George Washington University.(1999, July 6). A pledge of federal help for the economic byways. New York Times, p. A10.(1993). Understanding family process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(2000, March 15). Earlier work with children steers them from crime. New York Times, p. A16.(1986) Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.113(1998, May 22). One-time welfare recipient leaves $5,000 to county. Minneapolis Star Tribune, p. B1(1998, March). Current population reports: special studies, Coresident grandparents and grandchildren. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census., & (1993) Human ecology theory. In P.Boss, W.Doherty, R.LaRossa, W.Schumm, & S.Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 419–447). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_17& (Bumps in the road. (1999, October-November). Public Perspective, 10(6), 23.1926) The family as a unity of interacting personalities. Family, 7, 3–9.(1979) Symbolic interaction and the family. In W.R.Burr, R.Hill, I.Nye, & I.Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 42–111). New York: Free Press., , , & (1989, January 21). Nation stands ready to push on [Transcript of Bush's inaugural address]. New York Times, p. Y10.(1999, June 20). Bush: “No turning back” from race for presidency. New York Times, p. Y16., (1980, June 20). Family feud. Star Tribune, p. 1A., , & ([Page 393]1976, September 17). American families: Trends, pressures, and recommendations. A Preliminary Report to Governor Jimmy Carter (Mimeo.)Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage., , & (2000, March). Child care arrangements for children under five: Variation across states. National Survey of American's Families, Series B, No. B-7. Urban Institute., , & (1987). First ladies. New York: Oxford University Press.(1996, March). Who's minding our preschoolers? [Current Population Reports P70–53]. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.(1997a, November). Who's minding our preschoolers? Fall 1994 update. [Current Population Reports P70–62]. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.(1997b, September). My daddy takes care of me! Fathers as care providers. [Current Population Reports P70–59]. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.(1998a, March). Household and family characteristics: March 1998 Update. [Current Population Reports P29–515]. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census., & (1998b, March). Co-resident grandparents and their grandchildren: Grandparent maintained families. [Population Division Working Paper No. 26]. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census., & (1938). The family and the Depression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., & (1996). Public and private families. New York: McGraw Hill.(1973) Public social policy and families in the 1970s. Social Casework, 54, 575–585.(1993a, October 20). Elizabeth Dole: Power player, playing cautiously. New York Times, p. B7.(1993b, October 21). Obstacles for men who want family time. New York Times, p. B4.(Christian group keeps to right and old time. (1993, September 12). New York Times, p. Y20.1999, November 1). Why it pays to quit. U.S. News and World Report, 74–86.(Clinton applies health plan to citizens’ personal lives. (1993, September 27). Star Tribune, p. A2.1992, July 17). [Text of address by President Clinton accepting the Democratic nomination]. New York Times, p. A12.(1994, January 27). [Transcript of President Clinton's message on the State of the Union]. New York Times, p. A10.(2000, January 28). [Text of President Clinton's State of the Union Address to Congress]. New York Times, p. A16.(Clinton job ratings. (1993, July-August). Public Perspective, 4(5), 82–84.1993a, January 27). Voices of new women resound in the Senate. New York Times, p. A16.(1993b, March 8). After three decades working in Senate, Kennedy gets a turn for his agenda. New York Times, p. A8.(1993c, July 27). A top GOP couple splits on National Service bill. New York Times, p. A8.(1993d, October 13). Many health plans, one political goal. New York Times, p. 14.(1994a, February 11). Senator outlines three alternatives to Clinton plan. New York Times, p. A1.(1994b, June 9). Health bills making gains in committees. New York Times, p. A12.(2000, January 4). Bradley and Gore renew the battle. New York Times, p. A1., & (1967) Government policy and the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 6–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/349665, 6c (1975). Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. San Diego: Academic Press.(1964) The nature of belief systems among mass publics. In D.Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.(1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.(1991, January). Marital status and personal well-being: A literature review. Family Relations, 40(1), 97–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585665([Page 394]Couple who left 2 daughters at home give them up for adoption (1993, July 12). New York Times, p. A7.1999, October-November). The new materialism. Public Perspective, 10(6), 29–31.(1999a, July 20). Parents’ anti-marijuana stand not getting across. Star Tribune, p. A1.(1999b, October 21). A child at a crossroads. Star Tribune, p. A1.(2000, June 28). It's time for parents to reclaim family time. Star Tribune, p. Bl.(1984, July 17) [Transcript of keynote address by Cuomo to Convention]. New York Times, p. 16.(1999, July 24). Short on tax-cut bill: Gain or loss for moderates. New York Times, p. A9.(1991) Family structure and children's health: United States, 1988. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Statistics, 10178.(Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104–199.1998, February 17). Legislation aims to help nursing mothers at work. Star Tribune, p. B1.(1981). The family and public policy. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.(1994a, May 22). Proposal for welfare cutoff is dividing Clinton officials. New York Times, p. A17.(1994b, April 22). Scrap welfare? Surprisingly, the notion is now a cause. New York Times, p. A10.(1972). The political culture of the United States. Boston: Little, Brown.(1993, November 9). White House runs and stumbles: Agenda is huge but authority is diffuse. Washington Post, p. A1.(1993) Reframing theories for understanding race, ethnicity, and families. In P.Boss, W.Doherty, R.LaRossa, W.Schumm, & S.Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 627–646). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_24, , & (Disney's maid bequeaths $4.5 million to aid children (1994, October 28). Star Tribune, p. 7A.1997). Postmodernism and family theory. [Mimeo]. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science.(1992, Autumn-Winter). Rational choice and the policy sciences. Policy Studies Review, 11(3/4), 359–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1992.tb00478.x(1994, September 29). Amid debate on her role, Hillary Clinton pushes on. New York Times, p. A1.(1999, March 12). Schools enlist parents in quest for funds. Minneapolis Star Tribune, p. B1.(1993, October 10). A review of the book, The Constitution was made, not born. New York Times Book Review, p. 3.(1999, March 8). Paul Weyrich: Crank or prophet. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, p. 10.(1993, June 3). Algerian convicted in Dakota County of depriving ex-wife of parental rights. Star Tribune, p. 20B.(1995, May 12). Budget cuts imperil efforts to save families. New York Times, p. A1.(1979) European and United States political contexts for family policy research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 497–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351621, & (1995) The impact of culture, society, and history on the legal process: An analysis of the legal status of same-sex relationships in the United States and Denmark. International Journal of Law and the Family, 9, 86–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/9.1.86(1975). Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.(1979). A framework for policy analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1994, July 11). Frayed nerves of people without health coverage. New York Times, p. A1.(1968), Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1975, July-August). Language, myths and rhetoric. Society, 14–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02699914(1985). The symbolic uses of politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2000) Membership recruitment letter. Zero Population Growth.(1974). Social Exchange Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1972). American federalism: A view from the states (2nd ed.). New York: Crowell.(1984). American federalism: A view from the states (3rded.). New York: Harper & Row.([Page 395]1986) Marketplace and the commonwealth and the three political cultures. In M.Gittell (Ed.), State politics and the new federalism (pp. 172–178). New York: Longman.(1994). Ties that stress: The new family imbalance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1999, August 30). A diatribal tradition: Town hall meetings draw fewer voters. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, p. 14.(1994, December 20). Gingrich: Man in spotlight and organization in shadow. New York Times, p. A1., & (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion andpolicy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press., C, & (1996). The case for same-sex marriage. New York: Free Press.(1996) After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy. In G.Esping-Anderson (Ed.), The welfare state in transition: National adaptations in global economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(Ethnicity in black and white. (1998, February-March). Public Perspective, 9(2), 58–65.Even governments can get high marks. (1993, July-August). Public Perspective, 4(5), 91.The family (1998, February-March). Public Perspective, 9(2), 17–24.Family delegates rank issues. (1980, July 14). Minneapolis Sunday Tribune, p. A8.1993) Social conflict theories of family. In P.Boss, W.Doherty, R.LaRossa, W.R.Schumm, & S.Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods, (pp. 357–381). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_15, & (2000, January 11). South Carolina GOP limits black voters, suit says. New York Times, p. A12.(1988) Political cultures and political characteristics of the American states. Western Political Quarterly, 41, 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448462, & (1999, April-May). Women's status: A century of enormous change. Public Perspective, 10(3), 26–28.(1999, March 28). From supercharged financial markets to Osama bin Laden, the emerging global order demands an enforcer. That's American's new burden. New York Times Magazine, 40–97.(1979). Public policy: Scope and logic. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.(1999). Ask the children: What America's children really think about working parents. New York: Morrow.(1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic.(Gelfand, D.E., & Barresi, C.M. (Eds.). (1987). Ethnic dimensions of aging. New York: Springer.1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1976) Social policy and the family. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 275–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.05.080179.001423(1998, July 28). Raising grandchildren, rising stress. New York Times, p. B8.(1996). A world of their own making: Myth, ritual and the quest for family values. New York: Basic.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine., & (1999a, June 30). Insurance for Viagra spurs coverage for birth control. New York Times, p. A1., (1999b, October 23). On web, models auction their eggs to bidders for beautiful children. New York Times, p. A10.(1999, October 20). Fear and violence have declined among teenagers, poll shows. New York Times, p. A1., & (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press.(1971); Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 624–636. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/349435(1995). Resource guide to careers in child an family policy. Chicago: Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies and the Chapin Hall Center for Children., & (1999, June 20). Gore: ‘Within a generation's journey is a new horizon.’. New York Times, p. Y16.(1965). Race and the history of an idea in America. New York: Schocken.(1960) The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092623(Gov. Sundlun settles lawsuit on paternity (1993, June 18). New York Times, p. A1.[Page 396]1996, September 9). The family values party. Newsweek, 82.(1986). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.(1999, October 4). A few surprises for working parents. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, p. 29., & (1993, December 11). Second wave of AIDS feared by officials in San Francisco. New York Times, p. 1.(1990). What is familyMountain View, CA: Mayfield., & (1990) Individualism in family law. In D.Blankenhorm, S.Bayme & J.Elshtain (Eds.), Rebuilding the nest (pp. 161–178). Milwaukee: Family Service America.(1972). Organizations: Structure and process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.(1999, May 18). Health plan group is waging its own campaign for 2000. Minneapolis Star Tribune, p. A3.(1993, October 25). Seeking a cure: Looking for answers to America's health care woes. Star Tribune, pp. 5H-7H, 9H-10H., & (1993a, October 17). Shoplift arrest leads police to children in attic. New York Times, p. Y16.(1993b, November 8). Use of curfews growing against youths at night. New York Times, p. A13.(The harm in family welfare caps (1994, June 9). New York Times, p. A18.Hawaii slams door on gay marriages: Eyes turn to Vermont (1999, December 11). Retrieved from the World Wide Web:http://www.startribune.com.Health care: Clinton's plan and the alternatives. (1993, October 17). New York Times, p. A14.Health care: The public reacts. (1993, November-December). Public Perspective, 5(1), 74–75.Health care update. (1994, July-August). Public Perspective, 5(5), 84.The heart stands still. (1999, October-November). Public Perspective, 10(6), 20.1976). Rational choice and social exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(Helping hands. (1999, October November). Public Perspective, 10(6), 24.1993) Will same sex marriages be recognized in sister states? Full faith and credit and due process limitations on states’ choice of law regarding the status and incidents of homosexual marriages following Hawaii's Baehr v. Lewin. University of Louisville Journal of Family Law, 32(3), 551–600.(1999, November 29). When strangers become family. U.S. News and World Report, 59–67.(1982). Subjective well-being among different age groups. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research., , & (1993) Stepfamilies as setting for child development (mimeo). University of Virginia.& (1949). Families under stress. New York: Harpers.(1958) Generic features of families under stress. Social Casework, 49, 139–150.(1971) Modern systems theory and the family: A confrontation. Social Science Information, 10, 7–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/053901847101000501(1980) Status of research on families. In The Status of Children, Youth and Families, 1979. Administration for Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [DHHS Publication No. (OHDS) 80-30274]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.(1960) The identification of conceptual frameworks utilized in family study. Marriage and Family Living, 22, 299–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/347242, & (1994), June 26). Family leave laws mark is minimal on working world. Star Tribune, p. A1.(1993, December 12). A grandmother fights for her second generation. New York Times, p. 20.(1994, June 24). Welfare doesn't foster out-of-wedlock births, researchers declare. Star Tribune, p. A8.(2000, June 2). Senate candidates debate social problems. Star Tribune, p. A16.(House health debate: Forensics medicine. (1994, March 17). Star Tribune, p. A7.[Page 397]1993, October 15). “Citizens’ jury” supports Wellstone's health care proposal over Clinton plan. Star Tribune, p. A10.(1995, December 20). To French, solidarity outweighs balanced budget. New York Times, p. A1.(1996, December 13). Welfare's snug coat cuts Norwegian cold. New York Times, p. A1.(1993, September 28). Making deals, not waves in strategy for health plan. New York Times, p. A10.(1990). Culture shift in advanced society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(1996, November 7). When parents decide to take charge again. New York Times, p. A13.(1994). Social policy: from theory to practice. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.(1995, December 25). Woman works toward a career and reunites with daughter. New York Times, p. A10.(1994, July 20). Coverage of 95 percent might be enough, Clinton concedes. New York Times, p. A1.(1931). Laboring and dependent classes in Colonial America: 1607–1783. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1976) Political culture in the United States: Elazar's formulation examined. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 491 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110685(1997a, October 13). She smoked and he sued; she quit and they won. New York Times, p. A1.(1997b, January 22). Father who won custody of boy moves out. New York Times, p. A8.(1997, May 5). Paralyzed since fall in 1962, man is still seeking benefits. New York Times, p. A1.(1999, September 5). Gap between rich and poor found substantially wider. New York Times, p. Y14.(Jones v. Hallahan, 501 SW 2d 588 (Ky App 1973).Just what is the WTO and how does it operate? (1999, November 30). Minneapolis Star Tribune, p. A16. [First appeared in the Washington Post].1969). Studies in social policy and social planning. New York: Russell Sage.(1979). Government structure versus family policy. New York: Columbia University Press., , & (1976). Developing a family impact statement. New York: Foundation for Child Development.(1976) Explorations in family policy. Social Work, 21, 181–186., & (Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (Eds). (1978). Family policy: Government and families in fourteen countries. New York: Columbia University Press.1975). Inside the family. Harper & Row., & (King, E., & Hill, M.A. (Eds.) (1993). Women's education in developing countries: Barriers, benefits and policies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (for the World Bank). http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/0-8018-4534-31980, June 27). Conference on families filled Carter campaign pledge. Star Tribune, p. A1.(1993, June 8). Immigrant dream of heaven chokes in journey of misery. New York Times, p. A1.(1999, November 10). Academic programs in family policy. Presentation at annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Irvine, CA.(1999) The congressional debate over the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA): An examination of competing perceptions. [Mimeo], St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science., & (1993, October 17). Will U.S. be healthier? Not so easy, experts say. New York Times, p. A1.(1995, August 6). Whose family values are they anyway. New York Times, p. El.(1946). Families in trouble. New York: Kings Crown.(2000, August 22). Losing my father one day at a time. New York Times, p. A27.(1996, September 10). Welfare as Japan knows it: A family affair. New York Times, p. A1.(2000, March 29). Pursuing happiness. New York Times, p. A29.([Page 398]1999, September 6). Anti-federalism measures have bipartisan support. New York Times, p. A8.(2000, August 6). President vetoes marriage-tax cut he calls reckless. New York Times, p. Y1.(1999, April-May). Everyday life: How are we doing. Public Perspective, 10(3), 1–20.(Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund (1997–1998). About Lambda Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.lamdalegal.org/egi-bin/pages/about.2000, February 14). Young workers value lifestyle over cash, surveys say. Star Tribune, p. E5.(1994, December 31). Clinton's high victory rate conceals disappointments. Congressional Weekly, 3619–3623.(1993) Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P.Boss, W.Doherty, R.LaRossa, W.Schumm, & S.Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 135–162). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_6, & (1968) The policy orientation. In D.Lerner & H.Lasswell (Eds.), Policy sciences (pp. 3–15). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(Legitimacy: Americans continue to believe their society extends real opportunity to advance. (1999, April-May). Public Perspective, 10(3), 9.1987) History of social welfare. In A.Minahan, R.Becerra, S.Briar, C.Coulton, L.Ginsberg, J.Hopps, J.Longres, R.Patti, W.Reid, T.Tripodi, & S.K.Khinduka (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Work (Vol. 2, pp. 755 588). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.(1979, July 1), A program for training family impact analysts. [Mimeo]. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.(1979). What price national policy for families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 457–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351615, & (1997). Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project. London: Sage.(1966). The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2000, March 26). Citing a crisis, Bush proposes literacy effort. New York Times, p. A1.(1993, November 8). Conflict for working couples: When he retires, must she. New York Times, p. A1.(1998, June 7). Report tying abortion to welfare is rejected. New York Times, p. A10.(1999, December 3). Conceding free trade's flaws. New York Times, p. A29.(1959) The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/973677(1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: Norton.(1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal and formal networks. New York: Guilford.(1968). Folk song style and culture. Washington, DC: American Academy for the Advancement of Science.(1999, April-May). Economic status: Americans assess opportunity, fairness and responsibility. Public Perspective, 10(3), 2–13.(1998, March). Marital status and living arrangements: An update. [Current Population Reports P20–514]. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/ms-la/tabad2.txt.(1985). Policy indicators: Links between social science and public debate. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.(Making sense of Social Security: A discussion starter. (1998). Washington, DC: Americans discuss Social Security, a project funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts.Man sentenced to 24 years in prison for withholding child support (1999, August 20). St. Paul Pioneer Press., p. B2.1993, February 7). After 2 failed nominations, many women are seething. New York Times, p. A1.(1994, March 15). A meeting a Labor Secretary can't help but love. New York Times, p. C5.(1998, February-March). Is the era of big government over. Public Perspective, 9(2), 27–29.(1994) Public spirit in political systems. In H.J.Aaron, T.E.Mann, & T.Taylor (Eds.), Values and public policy (pp. 146–172). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.([Page 399]1998, September 21). Worried about morals but reluctant to judge. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, p. 10., & (Marriage license discount. (2000, March 10). Session Weekly, 17(6), 10.1996, November-December). The great Social Security scare. The American Prospect, 30–37., & (“Material status” is more than economic: Children raised in one-parent families have more than doubled in last quarter century. (1999, April-May). Public Perspective, 10(3), 14.1976a). Writing of state level family impact statements: A preliminary report. [Family Impact Series Report No. 1]. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Study Center.(1976b). An annotated bibliography for family impact analysis. [Family Impact Series Report No. 3]. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Study Center.(1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press., & (1984). The American ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., & (1981). Systematic assessment of family stress, resources, and coping: Tools for research, education and clinical intervention. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science., & (1979) Family well-being and quality of life. Family Coordinator, 28, 313–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/581943(1991, Spring). Consensual public policy in an adversarial culture. National Forum (The Phi Kappa Phi Journal). 20–21.(1999, April-May). Land that I love: Feelings toward country at century's end. Public Perspective10(2), 21–25.(1990) Contextual content analysis. Quality and Quantity, 24,245–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00139259, & (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(Measuring up to the past. (1999, October-November). Public Perspective, 10(6), 22.1993, July 15). A House and Senate divided. Star Tribune, p. A4. [Reprinted from the Washington Post].(1994, December 11). No reform, no cost Rx. Star Tribune, p. Dl.(1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage., & (198 8). Domestic revolutions: A social history of American family life. New York: Free Press., & (1999a, July 14). On patients’ bill, Republicans defeat Democrats’ provisions. New York Times, p. A16.(1999b, July 24). Tax-cut bill could well revive a thing of the past: The “three martinilunch.”. New York Times, p. A9.(1999, October 16). Lawmaker amasses power, and uses it. New York Times, p. A1., & (Mom fights for baby's life (1993, September 25). Star Tribune, p. A5.1976). The family and the state: Considerations for social policy. London: Longman.(1987) Social welfare policy: Trends and Issues. In A.Minahan, R.Becerra, S.Briar, C.Coulton, L.Ginsberg, J.Hopps, J.Longres, R.Patti, W.Reid, T.Tripodi, & S.K.Khinduka (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Work (Vol. 2, pp. 664–681). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.(1965, September 18). A family policy for the nation. America. 280–283. [Cited in Family and Nation, The Godkin Lectures, Harvard University, April 8–9, 1985].(1994, June 21). Laotian's arrest in killing bares a generation gap. New York Times, p. A8.(1941). Nation and family: The Swedish experiment in democratic family and population policy. New York: Harper.(1968). Nation and Family. Cambridge: MIT Press.(National Center for Health Statistics (1991, August 28). Annual summary of births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: United States, 1990. [Monthly Vital Statistics Report 39(13)]. Hyatts-ville, MD: Public Health Service.A new framework for health care (1993, September 23). New York Times, p. A10.[Page 400]2000, June 25). In San Francisco, more live alone, and die alone, too. New York Times, p. Y10.(NIMH post doctoral training program in national policy and the family (1976) [Mimeo]. Institute of Policy Science.1997). Welfare as we knew it: A political history of the American welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.(1993, December 18). As boot camps for criminals multiply, skepticism grow. New York Times, p. 1.(NPG statement on population (1994, March-April). Sierra, 79(2), 17.1979) Choice, exchange, and the family. In W.Burr, R.Hill, I.Nye, & I.Reiss (Eds.), Cow-temporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 1–41). New York: Free Press.(1997, June 29). Culture clash: Foreign parents, American children. New York Times, p. E3.(1979) Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical application. Family Process, 3–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x, , & (1974). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1993, December 21). When holiday styles are generations apart. New York Times, p. A1.(1993) Feminist theories: The social construction of gender in families and society. In P.Boss, W.Doherty, R.LaRossa, W.Schumm, & S.Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 591–622). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_23, & (Parents can be charged. (1993, July 3). Star Tribune, p. A7.1992) Discourse: Social psychology and postmodernity. In J.Doherty, E.Graham, & M.Malak (Eds.), Postmodernism and the social sciences (p. 83). New York: St. Martins Press.(Partners Task Force for Gay and Lesbian Couples (1998), Hawaii marriage suit timeline. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.buddybuddy.com/t-line-3.html.1996, October 26). The Well-Springs of Social Values. Paper presented at a conference on Social Values and Public Policy, George Washington University.(1991, May 11). Focusing on welfare. New York Times, p. 5.(1993a, October 5). Poverty in U.S. grew faster than population last year. New York Times, p. A10.(1993b, October 10). Poverty 1993: Bigger, younger, getting worse. New York Times, p. E5.(1994, June 14). Panel on benefits spending see storm brewing on costs. New York Times, p. A6.(1996, April 20). Health legislation: Gradualism wins the day, for now, but doubts persist. New York Times, p. Y32.(1997, June 1). Groups are lining up to defend interest in Medicare debate. New York Times, p. A24.(1999a, October 4). House bills diverge over a patient's right to sue. New York Times, p. A24.(1999b, October 9). Stung by defeat in house, HMOs seek compromise. New York Times, p. A9.(1999c, March 23). Reports of abuse of elderly are ignored, panel is told. New York Times, p. A20.(2000. August 14). How one county cleared the welfare rolls. New York Times, p. Al.(1999, October 22). Good old days weren't so great, demographic report says. Star Tribune, p. B1.(1988). Putting asunder: A history of divorce in Western society. New York: Cambridge University Press.(1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.(Polity Watch—of the people, by the people (1999, October November). Public Perspective, 10(3), 39.Poll reveals another sign of changing U.S. family. (1999, November 26). New York Times, p. A22.1998, November 3). With New Jersey family cap, births fall and abortions rise. New York Times, p. A29.(Profiling the Clinton presidency (2000, January-February). Public Perspective, 11(1), 8.[Page 401]Public perceptions of Social Security: Public supports using the budget surplus (1999, February). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Survey Research Associates. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.adss.org/polldata/pollbudgetsurplus.cfm.2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.(1992) Teaching family policy through advocacy and empowerment. Family Relations, 41, 39 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585390(1999, October 27). State Sen. Steve Kelley announces candidacy. St. Louis Park Sun Sailor, p. A1.(1999, July 17). Republican family is split on what to do about marriage-tax issue. Star Tribune, p. A18.(1983) Perceptual indicators of family life quality. Social Indicators Research, 12(4), 417–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00300447, & (1991). Family life quality: Theory and assessment in economically stressed farm families. Social Indicators Research, 24, 269–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00306083, , & (1977). Family policy: Content and context. New York: Family Service Association.(1994, June 18). Prosecution in ‘89 on domestic violence charges is called “a terrible joke.”. New York Times, p. 8., (1998) Governing America: Our choices, our challenge. Dayton, OH: National Issues(Forums Research. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705 (1973).Role of government in good times. (1999, October November). Public Perspective, 10(6), 39.1994, June 1). A giant voice in Congress: Rostenkowski is one of a vanishing breed. New York Times, p. A1.(1999, January 28). Social Security: The basics, with a tally sheet. New York Times, p. A19.(1977) Evaluation research: An assessment of theory, practice and politics. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 5–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X7700100102, & (Rules change: “It's a whole Newt world.” (1995, January 5). Star Tribune, p. A1.1993) Exchange and resource theories. In P.Boss, W.Doherty, R.LaRossa, W.Schumm, & S.Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 385–411). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_16, & (1999, December 3). Clinton criticizes free trade body in stormy Seattle. New York Times, p. A1.(1978, August). Seminar urges caution in family impact area. APA Monitor, 9(6), 1.(1995, January 4 10). The carrot and the club. Twin Cities Reader, 8–11.(1999, October 28). Helms orders 10 women from House out of Senate hearing. New York Times, p. A17.(1968). Explorations in social policy. New York: Basic.(1972, January). Family values and public policy: A venture in prediction and prescription. Journal of Social Policy, 1(1), 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400002178(1984, May 18). Change the definition in poverty decline. Star Tribune, p. A25.(1995). Words of welfare: The poverty of social science and the social science of poverty. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.(Seeking a cure: Looking for answers to America's health care woes. (1993, October 25). Star Tribune (Supplement), pp. 1H-35H.1994, March 6). Leader on Senate: Not a lifetime job. New York Times, p. 11.(1997, January 16). House rule may rem in liberal advocacy groups. New York Times, p. A12.(1998, May 30). Vote set for prayer and marriage penalty bills. New York Times, p. A2.(1994). The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570940(1980) Description as choice. Oxford Economic Papers, 32.(1985) Well being, agency, and freedom. The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2026184(1997, March 24). Working and welfare parents compete for day care slots. New York Times, p. A12.([Page 402]1999, September 6). The widening income gulf. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities., & (1915, July 24). The influence of Mothers’ Aid on family life. Survey, 34(17), 378–379.(1998, March 15). More execs resigning for family time. Star Tribune, p. D5.(1997, January 3). Fewer chums in the cabinet. Star Tribune, p. A7.(1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.(Singer v. Hara, 522 P 2d 1187, 11 Wash. App. 247 (1974).Six-month study shows that working families are moving out of poverty. (2000, March-April). Minnesota Investment, 1.1977). family in transition: Rethinking marriage, sexuality, childrearing, and family organization. (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown., & (1994, March 15). Study: Elderly poor happy with HMOs. Star Tribune, p. IB.(1978) The historical triangulation of family, economy, and education. In J.Demos & S.S.Boocock (Eds.), Turning points: Historical and sociological essays in the family (pp. S288–S315). Chicago: University of Chicago Press., & (1999, July 31). Evolving answers to the why of suicide. New York Times, p. A15.(1997, November 16). Group aims to improve family-values debate. Star Tribune, p. E10.(1999, September 9). Ramsey county increases spending for kids. Star Tribune, p. B1.(1994, April 18). Schools are taking parents to court on truancy. New York Times, p. A1.(1994). Sources of health insurance: Characteristics of the uninsured. Washington, DC: Employee Benefits Research Institute., & (1993, September 27). Women asking U.S. asylum expand definition of abuse. New York Times, p. A1.(Spousal assault trial cast as cautionary tale for men and women. (1993, November 8). New York Times, p. A8.1979) Conflict theory and the study of the family. In W.Burr, R.Hill, I.Nye, & I.Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 130–159). New York: Free Press.(1996). In the name of the family: Rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Boston: Beacon.(1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.(1998, May). Marital status and happiness: A 17-Nation Study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 527–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353867, & (1999, October 10). Europeans living the good life Americans find little time for. Star Tribune, p. A22.(State Legislative Leaders Foundation (1995). Keys to effective legislation for children and families. Centerville, MA: Author.1995, September 5). On families and values. Congressional Record. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://thomas.loc.gov.(1981). The futility of family policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.(1999a, July23). Republicans pass big tax cut to set stage for debate. New York Times, p. A1.(1999b, February 2). Seeking the high ground on spending surpluses. New York Times, p. A16.(1999c, July 30). Senate GOP moves ahead on tax plan. New York Times, p. A16.(1999d, September 24). Clinton vetoes GOP tax cut but seeks compromise. New York Times, p. A20.(1976) Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 838–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094730, & (1997, May 26). Women's issues and wariness in Congress. New York Times, p. A7.(1977). The family, sex, and marriage in England, 1500–1800. New York: Harper & Row.(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1964) The interactional and situational approaches. In H.Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 125–170). Chicago: Rand McNally.(Study: Earth Population Outpacing Resources (1994, February 22). Star Tribune, p. A7.1998, May 27). Despite abuse, a boy wants home back, and may get it. New York Times, p. A1.([Page 403]1999, September-October). Discovering our children. Networker, 24–35.(1979) Implementation of a national family policy: The role of the social scientist. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351618(Teenager says parents deprived him of food (1999, April 19). New York Times, p. A14.1992, Fall). Voter turnout in America. Brookings Review, 10(4), 28–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20080339(1972) The evolution of organizational environments. In K.Azumi & J.Hage (Eds.), Organizational Systems (pp. 75–91) Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.(1969). A modern dictionary of sociology. New York: Thomas Crowell., & (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley., & (Things have always gone up and down. (1993, July-August). Public Perspective, 4(5), 93.1928). The child in America. New York: Knopf., & (1999, April 18). Battered and unprotected. New York Times, p. Y31.(Time to retire the filibuster (1995, January 1). New York Times, p. E8.1993, October 22). Abortion and the health plan: Hard questions in both camps. New York Times, p. A10.(1994, August 18). House action of health measure may wait till after Labor Day. New York Times, p. A1.(1999a, October 4). House is set to take up debate on patients’ rights. New York Times, p. A24.(1999b, October 9). Fevered issue, second opinion. New York Times, p. Al.(1999c). July 28). Long term care merges political with personal. New York Times, p. A1.(1997, February 23). Behind door of privacy, kids pay a terrible price. Star Tribune, p. A21.(1974). From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in the United States. New York: Free Press.(1971). The Government Process. New York: Knopf.(1994) To boldly go where no one has gone before. The legalization of lesbian and gay marriages. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 1(1), 73–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J041v01n01_05(1999, October 18). Devising new math to define poverty. New York Times, p. A1.(U.S. Bureau of the Census (1983). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1984 (104th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.U.S. Bureau of the Census (1986). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1987 (107th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Bureau of the Census (1990). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1990 (111th ed.)Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Bureau of the Census (1993). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1993 (113th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Bureau of the Census (1994). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1994 (114th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Bureau of the Census (1996). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1996 (116th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Bureau of the Census (1997). State government finances, 1995 (117th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.U.S. Bureau of the Census (1998). Statistical abstracts of the United States, 1998 (118th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Use of “ma'am” or “sir” may soon be law in Louisiana (1999, June 16). Star Tribune, p. A5.1995, August 30). Mother scolded by judge for speaking in Spanish. New York Times, p. A9.(2000, July 24). Many say death to the “death tax.”. Star Tribune, p. Al.(1905, April 22). Family desertion and non-support laws. Charities, 14(4), 682–684.(1996, December 20). Interest groups prepare for huge fight on Social Security. New York Times, p. A9.(1985). Baste content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1997, December 27). Many Laotians in U.S. find their hopes betrayed. New York Times, p. A1.(1994, April 30). Aaron needs family, not this cruel policy. Star Tribune, p. A21.([Page 404]White House Conference. (1977–78, December-January). The American family: National action overview.Who cares? Minnesotans do. (2000, January 20). Star Tribune, p. A22.1999, October 21). Quality day care, early, is tied to achievements as adults. New York Times p. A16.(2000). School vouchers: A rose by any other name. New York Times, p. A1.(1993, April 4). First born, fast grown: The manful life of Nicholas, 10. New York Times, p. A1.(1999, June 28). Social disease to social policy. Star Tribune, p. All.(1993, April). The family values debate. Commentary, 95(4), 24–31.(1992, March 10). President focuses on “family values.”. New York Times, p. A15.(1993, November 25). Moynihan and Kennedy tangle over handling of health bill. New York Times, p. A12.(1994, December 18). Republicans seek sweeping changes in House rules. New York Times, p. A1.(Wisconsin woman is jailed after her daughter, 15, dies weighing 15 pounds (1998, November 28). Star Tribune, p. A8.With wit and reflection, Dee Dee Myers bows out. (1994, December 23). Star Tribune, p. A9.1976, Spring). Social impact assessment: The state of the art restated. Sociological Practice, 1, 56 69.(1998). One nation, after all. New York: Penguin.(2000, March 15). Tears, fear, and anxiety cloud days as nursing homes close. Star Tribune, p. B1.(1994). The agenda: Inside the Clinton “White House. New York: Simon & Schuster.(1994) How changes in the economy are reshaping American values. In H.Aaron, T.Mann, & T.Taylor (Eds.), Values and Public Policy (pp. 16–54). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.(1998, February-March). How American individualism is evolving: American opinion in the 1990s. Public Perspective, 9(2), 3–6.(1980, June 20). Unity plea opens family meeting. Star Tribune, p. A1., & (1973). Organizations and innovations. New York: Wiley., , & (1980) Interest groups and public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 439–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb00952.x, & (1993) Long-term effects of parental divorce on parent-child relationships, adjustment, and achievement in young adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(6), 1–13., , & (1976) The family and its relevance for social policy. Social Casework, 57, 547–554.(1979) Policy, social policy, family policy: Concepts, concerns, and analytic tools. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(3), 487–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351620(1982) Confusions and contradictions in family policy developments: Applications of a model. Family Relations, 31(3), 445–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584178(1988a). Understanding family policy: Theoretical approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243658(1988b). State level public policies as predictors of state teenage birthrates. Family Relations, 37(3), 315–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584569(1992a). Family policies and family well-being: The role of political culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1992b). Family trends: What implications for family policy. Family Relations, 42(4), 423–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585585(1993a, November 6–9). Congressional votes on key family legislation 1976, 1985, 1990: Political culture, political party, or gender? In B.Settles and J.Trost (Eds.), Gender and Families: Choices, challenges, and changing policy. [Working papers]. Seminar, Committee on Family Research, International Sociological Association. Annapolis, MD.(1993b). Political culture, policy choices, and unmet needs. In A.Leenaars (Ed.), Suicidology: Essays in honor of Edwin Shneidman (pp. 42–60). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.(1994) The role of the state in family life: States’ AFDC payments and their divorce rates. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 14, 14–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb013184([Page 405]1995a). Understanding family policy: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243658(1995b). Psychache in context: States’ spending for public welfare and their suicide rates. journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 183, 425–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199507000-00002(1997a). Educational policy and the role of advocacy. In M.L.Fuller & G.Olsen (Eds.), Home-school relations: Working successfully with parents and families (pp. 332–554). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.(1997b). A potential case of social bankruptcy: States’ AFDC payments and their teen birth rates. Policy Studies Review, 25(1), 109–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00010.x(1999, May). Family policy research: A system's view. Family Science Review, 12(2), 113–130.(2000) States’ political cultures and their family policies in the 1990s. In J.Mercier, S.Garasky, and M.Shelley II (Eds.), Redefining Family Policy: Implications for the 21st Century (pp. 21–41). Ames, IA: Iowa University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470290156.ch2(1997). The gender factor in policy choices relations to families: Congressional votes, 1985, 1990, 1993, 1995. [Mimeo]. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science., & (1979). Legislators’ attitudes toward family policy. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(2), 507–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351622, , & (1989) Comparing the family policies of three states: A content analysis. Family Relations, 38, 190–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/583674, & (1978, Fall). The use of I&R data in social planning. In V.Doyle (Ed.), Proceedings of an I&R Roundtable (pp. 60–69). Phoenix, AZ: I&R Alliance., & (
About the Author