Event Power: How Global Events Manage and Manipulate
Publication Year: 2013
Events dominate our screens, our lives, and increasingly global geopolitics. Analysis of events and their management has remained rooted in leisure and management studies - until now. This break-through book provides an introduction to event management, while also situating events in questions of power and social control.
Rojek powerfully argues that events are essential elements in corporate-state partnerships of ‘invisible government’ that have revived the romance of charity as to form illusory communities, while cloaking power imbalances and social inequalities. Events are moving politics from the old idea of ‘the personal is political’ to the new, more seductive notion that ‘representation is resistance’. Wielding rich case studies from the World Cup and the Olympics to Live Aid, Burning Man and Mardi Gras, Rojek presents a dazzlingly ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: What is Event Management?
- Chapter 2: What are the Main Types of Event?
- Chapter 3: Why is ‘Moral Regulation’ Relevant?
- Chapter 4: How is Event Cognition Formulated?
- Chapter 5: How are Global Events Organised?
- Chapter 6: What Do Cyclical Events Do?
- Chapter 7: Why are We Drawn to Events?
- Chapter 8: What is Event Consciousness?
- Chapter 9: What Do Single-Issue Events Do?
- Chapter 10: Why are Events So Emotional?
- Chapter 11: What is Event Appropriation?
- Chapter 12: Does Event Management Have a Future?
© Chris Rojek, 2013
First published 2013
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd
3 Church Street
#10-04 Samsung Hub
Library of Congress Control Number: 2012955760
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-0-85702-518-0 (pbk)
Editor: Mila Steele
Editorial assistant: James Piper
Production editor: Imogen Roome
Copyeditor: Jane Fricker
Proofreader: Katie Forsythe
Marketing manager: Michael Ainsley
Cover design: Jen Crisp
Typeset by: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd, Chennai, India
Printed in India at Replika Press Pvt Ltd
[Page iii]A revolutionary age is an age of action; ours is the age of advertisement and publicity.Soren Kierkegaard
One can trust anyone who babbles the jargon; people wear it in their buttonholes. … Simply to be there becomes the merit of the thing.Theodor Adorno
Narcissism and the direct satisfaction of impulses are major obstacles to the emergence of any collectivity worthy of the name.Serge Moscovici[Page iv]
It is not clear to me how advanced large-scale societies can fulfil the requirements of expressivism, other than by holding Nuremberg rallies.Ernest Gellner
Preface: The Goodwill Newsletter[Page vi]
Global events are the most heart-warming goodwill newsletter of modern times. Periodically, they burst into social consciousness as part of an established cycle of global festivity (the Olympics, the FIFA World Cup, the Rio Carnival, the Sydney Mardi Gras) or in response to an international emergency or incident (Live Aid, Tsunami Relief, the Benefit Concert for Hurricane Katrina). For the duration we are conscious of being part of an international community in which pre-ordained divisions of race, class, religion, sexual orientation, politics and the vulture logic of capitalism appear to magically vanish. Instead, the urge to do good, which is an entirely human and proper sentiment, is hot wired into disinterestedly celebrating the athletic prowess of Olympians or world class professionals in sport; feeding the hungry in Africa; ending torture in Darfur; providing relief from the misery and want that follows an earthquake or tsunami; saving the planet from pollution and corporate greed; or more prosaically, conveniently reminding ourselves at the company meeting that we are truly serving the customer and doing good, rather than merely maximising profit. The point about disinterest is revealing, because event logic is built on highly personal displays of emotional energy. Participation in events has become a mark of responsible citizenship, with all of the subsidiary implications for judgements of self-worth, validity and ethically acceptable behaviour that this implies.
Events are designer-built packages to boost publicity, symbolise fraternity and heighten awareness. Increasingly, global events employ celebrities to transfer glamour from the entertainment sector onto charitable and business undertakings.
The organisers and front men and women that present them see themselves as providing positive pedagogy (teaching us about third world inequality and injustice), enhancing social networking and contributing to cultural literacy.
Success in entertainment is redefined as honing a strong humanitarian, global perspective. For example, in Sydney (2011), the Global Leadership Forum brought George Clooney and Martha Stewart together with Muhammad Yunus, Russell Simmons, Michael Fertik and Jeff Taylor and put them on the stage of the Sydney Convention Centre to ‘unwrap the concepts, vision and motivation’ behind ‘authentic leadership’ and provide ‘challenging new ways of thinking, working [Page vii]and living’.1 Ordinary men and women are urged to learn how admired members of the powerful and influential draw on strong, cleansing emotions and apply them to higher business and humanitarian causes. In a world in which people are often triply estranged from government, the state and big business, global events are cheerful testaments to people power. The Forum celebrated the best practice of celebrity trend setters in humanitarian and business enterprise and conjured a spirit of presumed intimacy between strangers. For a moment we are team-world, and there is no obstacle of nature, faith, church, economy or polity that we cannot overcome.
The desire to do good is magically combined with the satisfaction of feeling good. Events contribute to a positive self-image. They possess therapeutic value. Their scale and importance has ascended in direct proportion to the expansion of social and cultural injunctions to get more in touch with our feelings and to emote frankly and without shame. Ernest Gellner (1994) once speculated that as human societies develop more efficient and dependable infrastructures of security, the struggle for survival is replaced with a struggle for approval and acceptance. If he is right, global events are the biggest human-made objects of approval and acceptance ever devised. The Olympics, the FIFA World Cup, Live Aid, Live Earth, Live 8 and their cognates are catalysts for deep emotional arousal and exchange. They issue licence to break out of our daily bubble of existence and allow us to express our no-holds barred common humanity. It is as if global events supply ordinary men and women with the intimation that the 7 billion people on the planet constitute the fundamental human entity, beyond the walls of nation, race, class and religion.
Yet events are neither spontaneous nor free expressions of people power. They are closely organised, schooled in the methods of exercising persuasion over human cognition by market research, rigorously planned and monitored in detail. Events are publicised as expressions of ‘people power’, but event ownership and management do not rest with the people. To be sure the entire category of the event audience is problematic. The mixtures of stadium crowds and network publics constitute an illusory community, in which unity and commitment are largely apparitions.
Many commentators increasingly point to the control functions of events. Events are portrayed as radiant, symbolic representations of civil society coming together. In reality, they apply principles of hierarchical authority and keep citizens at arm's length from ‘mega-project decision making’ (Flyvbjerg et al., 2003: 5).2 Citizens are not directly involved in planning, commercialisation and securitisation. In cyclical events like the Olympics and FIFA World Cup, the use of CCTV (closed circuit [Page viii]television) and UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) is a standard part of the security package. Global events are actually among the most controlled, regimented settings devised.
As Stephen Graham (2010, 2012) observes, the securitisation of the London Olympics (2012) involved the deployment of more troops than the war in Afghanistan. Anti-terrorism and crowd control measures involved the use of unmanned drones, surface-to-air missile systems, and a thousand armed US diplomatic and FBI agents policing an Olympic zone divided from the rest of the city by an 11-mile, £80 million 5000-volt electric fence. Investment in electronic surveillance included a new range of scanners, biometric ID cards, number plate and facial recognition CCTV systems, disease tracking surveillance and checkpoints.
Intensive risk assessment and adequate security and surveillance provision are now part of the global event planning process. It is subject to well-oiled lobbying interventions from the security and surveillance industry. Pressure from this quarter led to the investment of a $300 million ‘super panopticon’ CCTV and information system for the Athens Olympics (2004) (Samatas, 2007). Graham (2012) estimates that the cost of providing security for each athlete in the Athens Games was £90,000. For the London Olympics he puts the cost at £59,000 per competitor.
Investment on this scale puts a huge strain on metropolitan and national finances. The Athens Games are widely regarded to have created a culture of easy borrowing which was a major factor in the collapse of the Greek economy after the 2008 financial crash. In the bidding process, the estimated cost of the London Games was £2.37 billion. By the opening ceremony, this was held to have climbed to £24 billion (Graham, 2012).
All of this is done in the name of protecting ‘the people’. Yet citizens are not a genuine party to the decision-making processes. Post-event, the security and surveillance provision is transferred to providing ‘more effective’ community and city-wide policing. A version of Naomi Klein's (2007) famous ‘shock doctrine’ is at play here. Namely risk assessment of event anti-terrorist and crowd control security requirements underwrites colossal investment in security and surveillance systems which contribute to the more intensive policing of domestic populations in the postevent scenario.
Event concepts frame the event for the media and the public. The formation and application of the event concept is pivotal. Generally, it is simple, eye-catching and designed to appeal to the emotions, not the mind. ‘Feed The World’ was the event concept that defined Live Aid. Simultaneously, it demarcated solidarity and defied criticism. It is still rolled out today to combat academic and media accusations that post-event fund distribution squandered the Live Aid money earmarked for relief.3
As the event planning stage unfolds and moves into event proper and post-event relations, the event concept is a convenient short cut to [Page ix]override jarring sentiments and conflicting meanings that individuals and groups bring to, and take from, the event process. The concept is the brand. In an age where self-advertising and impression management are automatically accepted as the key to gaining personal impact, branding is everything. Selling the cause to the public effectively means developing the right concept, in the right place and at the right time. Event concepts work best when individuals accept, without reflection, that universal issues and problems are on team-world radar and that they must act upon them as one.
Outwardly, events are ecumenical. Unconsciously, they exhibit many elements of religious evangelism and old style salvationism. For example, the event concept is presented as bringing the ordinary man and woman into confidence. The issue or problem is a message about which ‘good’ people should know. The Make Poverty History campaign, which the Live 8 (2005) event showcased, aimed to turn people of all nations into disciples in the march against hunger, disease and inequality.
Global events focus on problems of misery, want and collective improvement. But their internal hard drive, which gradually becomes more palpable as the event process unfolds, is to bring the message of good news to people. Needless to say, good news does not lie in the human wreckage that follows a natural or geopolitical disaster. Rather it is the image of the true and noble response of the people to get stuck in, sort things out and affirm a fellowship that is admirable and appealing. Although we habitually feel powerless and impotent in the face of the world's problems, events permit us to feel that we are making a difference. Our conviction and energy provides an infusion of hope to the wretched. When we see a gay rights float at the Sydney Mardi Gras or a costume parade featuring the pessoas humilde (humble people) at the Rio Carnival or the image of starving African infants broadcast on the video screen of a concert to relieve hunger, we become part of an irresistible wave of global unity.All for One and One for All
The popularity of global events reveals important changes in the culture of charity and problem solving. It is not for nothing that Chris Hedges (2010: 200) observes:
The belief that we can make things happen through positive thoughts, by visualizing, by wanting them, by tapping into our inner strength, or by understanding that we are truly exceptional, is peddled to us by all aspects of culture.
[Page x]The most seductive mouthpieces that entreat us to make these acts of virtue are celebrities. To name but a few, George Clooney, Angelina Jolie, Cameron Diaz, Bono, Bob Geldof, Mia Farrow, Michael Stipe, Jay Z and Madonna are celebrity advocates and diplomats who preach on global issues and problems. In doing so, they impart a reviving, can do attitude to the public. Events are out of the ordinary experience, so it is no surprise that they use people who are culturally defined as extraordinary to inspire ordinary people to act. Celebrities have become an adjunct of the event brand. They humanise event goals and provide event management with sparkle. By assuming a noble, imploring attitude to help, they place themselves on the same footing with those whom they address.
Events are portrayed as virtuous responses to international emergencies or commemoration of long-standing injustice (such as gay repression or racial exclusion) and business and government are cast in the part of clumsy, inefficient operators. Audiences receive not only the gratification of being invited to help, they also have the self-confirmation of being ‘in the know’, i.e. being conversant with real world issues that ordinary people are unaware of, in which George, Angelina, Cameron and Bono confide with us. Additionally, there is the rhetoric of direct action which contrasts sharply with the image of muddling through that is associated with so much of what business and government do. Thus, events are presented as belonging to people with ‘modern’ attitudes. By implication, those who do not attend to, or participate in, events are ‘premodern’ or ‘traditional’.
But what do events really accomplish? To begin with, we should allow that it would be foolish to dismiss the reality and force of goodwill. Corporate events, for example, provide the workforce with an opportunity to revive and reinforce esprit de corps. Business and humanitarian events are no different in this respect. Businesses have long recognised the value of corporate events to improve camaraderie among the workforce and build the brand. Events switch resources to displays of corporate pride and unity. The strong emphasis upon ‘speaking frankly’ during the business event awayday provides a showcase for management to exhibit a caring, listening attitude. The professional event literature is vocal in claiming social integration and organisational image enhancement as standard event outcomes (Bowdin et al., 2011; Getz and Wicks, 1994).
Turning to humanitarian global events, there is no doubt that they bring people together and are fully capable of generating resources for the relief of misery and want. Events aspire to the condition of a people party. They provide the strong and winning image of people power. Nonetheless, questions are raised about both the longevity and concrete results of event people power. A number of studies suggest that event consciousness is finite (Collins, 2001; Elavsky, 2009). That is, popular [Page xi]interest in event causes fades away after the stage is dismantled and the perimeter fence and portable toilets are packed away.
Moreover, event consciousness is largely communicated through votive behaviour. It lies in the pledge to donate money to relieve suffering and the promissory grace-note to convert ludic energy into a moral crusade to change the very system that blights the world with hunger, injustice, carbon fuel emissions, nuclear power and so on. The question is, how far is votive behaviour removed from meaningful action? Do we change the world by attending a pop concert for famine relief or are we subconsciously participating in a gaudy enterprise whose consequences are incapable of rising above leaving the scaffold of power that protects the engines of inequality, injustice and irresponsible enterprise intact? Some research into event participation claims to expose the shallowness in the crowd and network public of the promissory grace-note to change the world. Instead it presents event participation more prosaically as a break from the routine of work, the monotony of unemployment and the activation of undiluted escapism (Tickle, 2011).
Might it not be that global events are more accurately viewed as part of the latest consumerist move towards what some observers in the USA have called ‘self-gifting’ (Carroll, 2011)? That is, the therapeutic practice of periodically and ostentatiously giving presents to yourself in order to provide self-gratification and serve notice to others of personal worth.4 Dean MacCannell (2011: 24) speaks of the rise of a new world of consumer experience that is already among us, in which behaviour takes the form of ‘staged authenticity’, in which appearance is all. In these conditions, concludes MacCannell, ‘raw ego’ has replaced personality.
Certainly, given the scale of human resources required, the money and manpower raised by global single-issue events like Live Aid and Live Earth, or cyclical events like the FIFA World Cup and the Olympics, offer little more than pinpricks of relief. Further, while global events are estimable outpourings of personal compassion, they are in reality a distraction from the severe economic, political and social issues on the world agenda. What is required is a fundamental thorough-going revision of fiscal responsibilities to remove toxic debt burdens in the developing world and create secure fair trade frameworks (Easterly, 2007; Moyo, 2010; Sachs, 2010, 2011). Instead of fixating on incidents, emergencies and episodes, events should contribute to a popular understanding of the underlying structures of power and causal sequences that reproduce inequality, injustice and exclusion.
These criticisms suggest that it is dangerous to take events at face value. A more searching attitude to who defines events, how they are managed and what they achieve is required. These are substantive questions having to do with how power is generally distributed and operates. However, overwhelmingly, the professional event literature provides a [Page xii]technocratic view of events. It focuses on the nuts and bolts in the machine and when and where to oil the parts. The crucial issues of who owns the machine, who controls it and what is its purpose are confined to the backwaters.
Event capitalisation is not merely a matter of economics. It encompasses the cultural capital and psychological energy that events generate. For too long a blind eye has been turned to the questions of how this capital relates to social ordering and the politics of self-gratification. What needs to happen is greater transparency about event aims and outcomes to ensure that events are understood clearly and the resources that they generate used appropriately.
In order to do this the relationship between events and emotional governance must be addressed. Events are important links in the chain of communication power that influential social networks deploy to regulate global populations. While the roots of causes generally lie in the work of activists, the media and associated power networks take them over and use their message for their own ends (Castells, 2009: 331–2). In gratifying individuals that they make a difference to world affairs and boosting social consciousness about global incidents and emergencies, events provide succour to all who suffer from pangs of guilt about colonialism and world inequality. They replace the logic of political economy with the romance of charity. They offer a sense of transcendence and the comforting feeling of personally providing something that is missing in the world. There is a child-like purity in putting your shoulder behind the wheel that feeds the world, ends poverty, halts pollution or celebrates brotherhood. However, the publicity radiance that precedes and accompanies a global event has the effect of making us brain-blind.
The scale of economic, humanitarian and environmental problems facing the world is bigger than the competence of any single event or amalgamation of events to solve. When we come together at a company meeting as one entity, the conflicts of interest that divide us, and the differences in authority and power that separate us from one another, melt away on stage, but stubbornly persist after the wine and canapes at the post-event party are consumed. In any case, a pragmatic focus on the ends of the event concept is the wrong place to concentrate energies. This is hard to articulate candidly, because events are so securely positioned on the moral high ground in our culture; but to the extent that events deflect efforts from strategic issues of power and inequality which are not merely divisive, but antagonistic, they are a red herring.
This book is written in the conviction that events do provide something that is missing: pinning the tail to the donkey. They stir up a global media mazurka that unintentionally obscures the structural transformations that are necessary to make the world (or the corporation) a better place. They perpetuate a homespun philosophy that ordinary men and [Page xiii]women have hearts of gold, who think of their neighbours first. They make us feel like heroes, just for one day. But who is driving the donkey and to what end?Notes
1 Clooney was advertised as ‘an actor, activist and co-founder’ of the charity Not On Our Watch; Martha Stewart as one of ‘the world's greatest entrepreneurs’; Muhammad Yunus as CEO of Grameen Bank and Nobel Peace Prize Winner; Russell Simmons – founder of Def Jam Records and Phat Farm clothing and author of Do You! Twelve Laws to Access the Power in You to Achieve Happiness and Success – as one of the ‘most influential people in the past 25 years’; Michael Fertik as ‘founder of http://reputation.com’; and Jeff Taylor, as ‘founder of http://Monster.com and http://Eons.com’. Planned and managed by the Growth Faculty, an Australian education and public relations organisation, the event billed itself as being about ‘unwrapping genius’. Reserved tickets were advertised at $A595; Premium Reserve at $A880; VIP Reserve at $A1100; and the VIP Cocktail Pack, providing seating at the VIP front section, access to VIP catering and networking and a ticket of entry to the VIP Cocktail Party in which all speakers, except George Clooney, ‘will attend’.
2 Events are typically presented in terms of a partnership – between event organisers, audiences and network publics, between chief executives and the workforce. In reality, the professionalisation and commercialisation of global events has created a monopoly over security and cost control in the event management team.
3 The strong self-image of global events as providing worthwhile pedagogy, contributing to cultural literacy and fundraising goes hand in hand with an exceptionally defensive attitude to criticism. When BBC reports alleged that Live Aid money had been appropriated to buy munitions and arms for the war in Ethiopia, Bob Geldof responded with the furious indignation that we associate with an Old Testament prophet. As we shall see later, there is a good deal of evidence to show that Live Aid funds were used to purchase munitions and arms that prolonged the war in Ethiopia (pp. 127–35). But because this evidence conflicts with Live Aid rectitude it is denigrated and pulverised by event planners and managers.
4 Even votive behaviour (to make a financial pledge) carries strong positive associations in event participation.[Page xiv]
References[Page 187]2009) ‘Chronic disaster syndrome: Disaster capitalism, and the eviction of the poor from New Orleans’, American Ethnologist36(4): 615–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2009.01199.x, and (2008) ‘Strong civil society as a double edged sword: Siting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans’, Political Research Quarterly61(3): 379–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912907312983and (2000) Event Planning. Toronto: Wiley.(2007) ‘Katrina, race, class and poverty’, Journal of Black Studies37(4): 466–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021934706296184(2004) ‘In the world-shadow of Bismarck and Nobel’, New Left Review27: 85–129.(2006) ‘Disneyization, Debord and the intergrated NBA spectacle’, Social Semiotics, 16(1): 89–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330500487885(1989) ‘The normative foundations of emancipatory theory: Evolutionary versus pragmatic perspectives’, American Journal of Sociology94(4): 721–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229066(2004) ‘Event management associations and the provision of services’, Journal of Convention and Event Tourism6(4): 5–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J452v06n04_02and (2007) ‘The global footballer and the local war-zone: George Weah and transnational networks in Liberia, West Africa’, Global Networks7(2): 230–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2007.00167.x(2005) ‘Left behind: The legacy of Hurricane Katrina’, British Medical Journal93(3): 916–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7522.916and (2010) ‘Concerns as Canada balances protests and civil liberties’, New York Times, 10.02.2010.(1962) How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Clarendon.(2002) ‘Bidding for the Olympics: Fool's gold?’, in C.Barros, M.Ibrahimo and S.Szymanski (eds), Transatlantic Sport, pp. 127–51. London: Edward Elgar.and (1968) Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.(2009) ‘Amateur experts: International fan labour in Swedish independent music’, International Journal of Cultural Studies12(5): 433–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367877909337857and (1992) Risk Society. London: Sage.(1976) The Coming of Post Industrial Society. New York: Basic.(1988) ‘The exhibitionary complex’, New Formations4(4): 73–102.(1923) Crystallizing Public Opinion. New York: Liveright.(1928) Propaganda. New York: Ig Publishing.(1947) ‘The engineering of consent’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 250(1): 113–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271624725000116(1998) ‘The revival of the democratic ethos’, in M.Rosenfeld and A.Arato (eds) Habermas on Law and Democracy, pp. 287–305. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1999) ‘Geographies of sexuality – a review of progress’, Progress in Human Geography23(2): 175–82.and ([Page 188]2008) Philanthrocapitalism: How The Rich Can Save the World and Why We Should Let Them. London: A & C Black.and (2003) ‘Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?’, The Lancet361: 2226–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2803%2913779-8, and (2005) “British Prime Minister Tony Blair reflects on “significant process” of G8 summit’; at: http://www.g8.gov.uk.(2007) Key Concepts in Work. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446215814and (2011) Events Management (, , , and (3rd edition) Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.2008) ‘Cosmopolitanism vs. terrorism? Discourses of ethical possibility before and after 7/7’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies36(2): 311–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298080360020801(2006) The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans and the Mississippi Gulf Coast. New York: William Morrow.(2005) ‘WHO estimates of the causes of death in children’, The Lancet365: 1147–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2805%2971877-8, , and (2004) The Disneyization of Society. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220122(2011) ‘Stop coddling the super-rich’, New York Times, 7.08.2011.(2006) ‘Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604: 171–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716205284676(2009) ‘Proctor & Gamble will sponsor Winter Olympics’, Forbes Business Journal, 31.08.2009.(1990) Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.(1993) Bodies that Matter. New York: Routledge.(1997) Excitable Speech: Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.(2001) ‘Putting emotions in their place’, in J.Goodwin (ed.), Passionate Politics, pp. 45–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2006) ‘Winding up Make Poverty History’, Socialist Worker Online; at: http://socialistworker.co.uk(1988).(1961) Man, Play and Games. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.(1999) ‘$1 million “fixed” the FIFA poll, author claims’, The Observer, 21.03.1999.and (2011) ‘The gift spigot was not open wide’, San Francisco Chronicle, 29.12.2011.(2005) The Bitter Sweet Awakening: The Legacy of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Sydney: Walla Walla Press.(1997) The Information Age. Oxford: Blackwell.(2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2011) ‘Manuel Castells on Occupy London’, You Tube broadcast posted by ‘Voicing the City’, 26.11.2011.(2000) Deliberation, Democracy and the Media. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield.and (2006) ‘The tale of three Olympic cities – forecast for Torni on basis of Grenoble and Innsbruck’, XX Winter Games Symposium, Turin.(1996) ‘The prehistory of samba: Carnival dancing in Rio de Janeiro, 1840–1917’, Journal of Latin American Studies28(1): 29–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00012621(2009) Enabling Creative Chaos. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1982) The Politics of Pop Festivals. London: Junction Books.(1999) ‘The growth effects of sport franchises, stadia and events’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management16(4): 601–624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6688%28199923%2918:4%3C601::AID-PAM4%3E3.0.CO;2-Aand ([Page 189]2007) ‘Cooking for Burning Man’, 8 August; at: http://video.google.com.and (2001) States of Denial. Cambridge: Polity.(2001) ‘Social movements and the focus of emotional attention’, in J.Goodwin (ed.), Passionate Politics, pp. 27–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2008) Celebrity Diplomacy. New York: Paradigm.(2006) ‘The 2010 Football World Cup as a political construct’, Sociological Review54(2): 108–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00656.xand (2000) ‘Mediated persona and political culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies3(3): 386–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136754940000300306(1985) The Great Arch. Oxford: Blackwell.and (2008) ‘ “Mediatized rituals”: A reply to Couldry and Rothenbuhler’, Media, Society & Culture30(1): 135–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084351(1994) ‘It's showtime: On the working of geographies of display in a restaurant in Southeast England’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12: 675–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d120675(2003) ‘Even newer social movements? Anti corporate protests, capitalist crises and the remoralization of society’, Organization10(2): 287–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010002006(2010) ‘Entertaining democracy’, in Media and Society ((5th edition), pp. 38–62. London: Bloomsbury.2011) Media and Democracy. London: Routledge.(2009) ‘Media system, public knowledge and democracy’, European Journal of Communication24(1): 5–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943, , and (2003) ‘Africa, the FIFA presidency and the governance of world football: 1974, 1998 and 2002’, Africa Today50(1): 3–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/at.2003.0055(2010) Peer to Peer and the Music Industry. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220535(1967) Society of the Spectacle. Cambridge: Zone.(1988) Comments on the Society of the Spectacle. London: Verso.(2009) ‘On the commune’, in T.McDonough et al., The Situationists and the City. London: Verso. (Originally published as ‘The bad days will end’, Situationist International Anthology 84 (1962).), and (2011) ‘Older, suburban and struggling, “near poor” startle the census’, New York Times, 18.11.2011., and (2000) The Second Coming of Steve Jobs. New York: Broadway Books.(2007) Media Work. Cambridge: Polity.(1996) ‘Special events legacy: The 1984 Louisiana Summer World's Fair in New Orleans’, Festive Management and Event Tourism4: 49–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/106527096792232405(1990) ‘Foreword’, in M Mauss, The Gift. New York: Norton.(1979) The World of Goods. New York: Basic. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203434857and (2007) The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2010) ‘Lennon the rebel, Bono the wonk’, The Washington Post, 12.12.2010.(2007) ‘Still waiting at the altar: Vancouver's 2010 on-again, off-again, relationship with social sustainability’, report prepared for COHRE Expert Workshop on Protecting and Promoting Housing Rights in the Context of Mega-Events. Geneva: COHRE.([Page 190]2011) ‘Bob Geldof: Live Aid & Me’, Mojo, 1.01.2011.(2001) ‘Performing tourism, staging tourism’, Tourist Studies1(1): 59–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146879760100100104(2000) ‘The politics of bread and circuses: Building the city for the visitor class’, Urban Affairs Review35(3): 316–33.(2009) ‘United as ONE: Live 8 and the politics of the global music spectacle’, Journal of Popular Music Studies21(4): 384–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-1598.2009.01209.x(2010) ‘G8 summit communique drops Gleneagles pledge on aid to Africa’, The Guardian, 4.06.2010.(2011) ‘G8 accused of cover-up on broken aid pledges’, The Guardian, 19 May.(1993) The Spirit of Community. New York: Touchstone.(1998) PR! A Social History of Spin. New York: Basic.(1991) The Process of Recreation Programming. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.and (2009) When The People Speak. Oxford, Oxford University Press.(2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic.(2003) Megaprojects and Risk. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., and (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2010) The State of Food Insecurity in the World. New York: Food and Agricultural Organization.2007) ‘So you want to work in … events management’, The Guardian.(2001) ‘Nonconformist populations and planning sexuality and space’, Journal of Planning Literature15(3): 339–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08854120122093069(1975) Discipline and Punish. London: Penguin.(1981) The History of Sexuality, volume 1. London: Penguin.(2010) ‘Why Bob Geldof has got it wrong’, British Journalism Review21(2): 51–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956474810374535(2009) Catastrophe in the Making: The Engineering of Katrina and the Disasters of Tomorrow. Washington, DC: Island Press., and (1987) Pedestrian Planning and Design. New York: Elevator World Inc.(2004) Therapy Culture. London: Routledge.(2011) Patriot Hearts: Inside the Olympics that Changed the Country. Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre.(2011) Securing and Sustaining the Olympic City. Farnham: Ashgate., , and (1988) A History of the Salzburg Festival. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.(2010) The Innovation Secrets of Steve Jobs. New York: McGraw Hill.(1993) ‘Cosmopolitan altruism’, Social Philosophy & Policy10(1): 118–34.(1998) ‘The world turned upside down: Mardi Gras at Carville’, The Journal of American Folklore111(439): 23–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/541318(2004) ‘The Micareta and cultural identity’, Latin American Perspectives31(2): 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582X03261192(1994) Conditions of Liberty. London: Penguin.(2005) Event Management and Event Tourism. New York: Cognizant Communication Corporation.(2012) Event Studies. London: Routledge.(1994) ‘Professionalism and certification for festival and event practitioners: Trends and issues’, Festival Management and Event Tourism2(2): 108–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/106527094792292078and ([Page 191]2007) ‘Managing festival stakeholders: Concepts and case studies’, Event Management2(3): 103–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/152599507780676689, and (1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.(2010) ‘Africans don't rate Bob Geldof, so why should we?’, The Telegraph, 15.07.2010.(2010) Theater in a Crowded Fire. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1959) The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Pelican.(1961) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.(1963) Stigma. London: Penguin.(1971) Relations in Public. London: Pelican.(Gold, J. and Gold, M. (eds) (2007) Olympic Cities. London: Routledge.2008) Special Events: Event Leadership for a New World ((5th edition). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.1975) O palacio do samba. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.(2008) ‘The polis of “global protest”’, Current Sociology56(5): 691–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392108093831and (2010) Cities Under Siege. London: Verso.(2012) ‘Welcome to Fortress London’, The Guardian, 13.03.1012(1982) Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.(2006) ‘Experience design in tourism’, in D.Buhalis and C.Costa (eds) Tourism Business Frontiers, pp. 101–110. Oxford: Elsevir Butterworth-Heinemann. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-6377-9.50019-5and (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: System and Lifeworld. Cambridge: Polity.(1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1998) The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1989) ‘Hallmark events and the planning process’, in G.Syme, B.Shaw, D.Fenton and W.Mueller (eds) The Planning and Evaluation of Hallmark Events. Aldershot: Avebury.(2006) ‘Urban entrepreneurship and corporate interests and sports mega-events: The thin policies of competitiveness within the hard outcomes of neo-liberalism’, Sociological Review54: 59–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00653.x(2010) ‘The Africanization of poverty: A retrospective on “Make Poverty History”’, African Affairs109(436): 391–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adq025(2004) The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1998) ‘Performances, discourses and trial balloons: Negotiating change at special events’, Cultural Dynamics10(3): 307–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/092137409801000305(2011) ‘Sustainable development, shock and awe? London 2012 and civil society’, Sociology45(5): 749–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413424and (1984) ‘The idea of hospitality in early modern England’, Past & Present102: 66–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/past/102.1.66(2010) Death of the Liberal Class. New York: Nation Books.(1998) ‘Assessing the impact of mega events: A linkage model’, Current Issues in Tourism1(1): 47–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13683509808667832([Page 192]2000) ‘Towards an urban sociology of mega-events’, Research in Urban Sociology5: 181–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-0042%2800%2980026-4(2011) ‘Public opinion in host Olympic cities’, Sociology, 45(5): 883–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413414and (1984) The Olympic Crises: Sport, Politics and the Moral Order. New Rochelle, NY: Caratzas Publishing.(1983) The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2011) ‘US officials worried about security at 2012 Olympics’, The Guardian, 13.11.2011.and (2004) ‘Accounting for mega-events: Forecast and actual impacts of the 2002 Football World Cup finals on the host countries of Japan/Korea’, International Review for the Sociology of Sport39(2): 187–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1012690204043462and (2007) ‘The four “knowns” of sports mega-events’, Leisure Studies26(1): 81–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02614360500504628(1956) ‘Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance’, Psychiatry19: 215–29.and (1998) ‘Blatter set to carry on where Havelange left off’, The Times, 9.06.1998.(2004) A Treatise on Human Nature. London: Penguin.(2011) ‘Investigating corruption in corporate sport: The IOC and FIFA’, International Review for the Sociology of Sport1–12.(2012) Olympic Risks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137022004(2011) ‘City festivals: Creativity and control in staged urban experiences’, European Urban and Regional Studies18(2): 1–14.and (2003) The Infrastructure of Play: Building The Tourist City. London: M.E. Sharpe.(2010) Postwar. London: Vintage.(2003) Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2008) ‘Performing politics: Image, embodiment, and affective solidarity during anti-corporate globalization protests’, Ethnography9(1): 61–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1466138108088949(2007) ‘Another disaster: An examination of portrayals of race in Hurricane Katrina coverage’, Visual Communication Quarterly14(2): 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15551390701555951, and (1995) ‘Performance’, Journal of American Folklore108(430): 479–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/541657(2005) ‘Risk versus national pride: Conflicting discourses over the construction of a high voltage power station in the Athens Metropolitan area for demands of the 2004 Olympics’, Human Ecology Review, 12(2): 133–42.(1999) How Emotions Work. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2005) ‘Journalism and democracy across borders’, in G.Overholser and K.H.Jamieson (eds) Institutions of Democracy: The Press, pp. 92–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2007) ‘The Katrina Hurricane spectacle and crisis of the Bush presidency’, Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies7(2): 222–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532708606295642(2011) ‘Sanitizing public space in Olympic host cities’Sociology, 45(5): 765–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413425and (1998) ‘Remember, Stonewall was a riot: Understanding gay and lesbian experience in the city’, in L.Sandercock (ed.) Making the Invisible Visible, pp. 120–32. Berkeley: University California Press.(1985) ‘The politics and morality of “Live Aid”’, Politics5(2): 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1985.tb00107.x([Page 193]2007) The Shock Doctrine. New York: Metropolitan Books.(1995) ‘From nationalist to multinational: The Stratford Festival, free trade, and the discourses of international tourism’, Theatre Journal47(1): 19–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3208804(1982) Religion. London: Fontana.(2002) ‘Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from Burning Man’, Journal of Consumer Research29(3): 20–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339919(1995) The Mass Ornament. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2011) ‘Japan's quake, tsunami among most costly of all time’; at: http://www.usnews.com.(2003) Carnival in Romans: Mayham and Massacre in a French City. London: W&N.(1896) The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: Cosimo.(2005) ‘Critical reflections on the economic impact assessment of a mega-event’, Tourism Management26(4): 595–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.03.002and (1999) ‘Tourism, urban development, and the “world class” city: The cases of Baltimore and Montreal’, in C.Andrew, P.Armstrong and A.Lapiere (eds) World Class Cities: Can Canada Play?, pp. 191–212. Ottawa: Ottawa University Press(2011) ‘Junction's spirit lost in growth’, LA Times, 26.08.2011.and (2006) ‘A review of festival and event motivation studies’, Event Management9(4): 239–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/152599506776771526and (1998) The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity.(1922) Public Opinion. New York: BN Publishing.(1998) ‘Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for audience reception studies’, in T.Liebes and J.Curran (eds) Media, Ritual and Identity: Essays in Honor of Elihu Katz, pp. 237–55. London: Routledge.(2005) ‘Bush tours devastated Gulf Coast’, Associated Press Wordstream.(2000) ‘Sex and violence in Brazil: Carnival, capoeira and the problem of everyday life’, American Ethnologist26(3): 539–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.19188.8.131.529(2001) ‘Language and the media: An emerging field for social psychology’, in W.P.Robinson and H.Giles (eds) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, pp. 585–600. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.and (2011) The Ethics of Sight-seeing. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520257825.001.0001(2010) ‘Seven arrested in Vancouver protest’, Toronto Sun, 13.02.2010.(2003) Incoherent Empire. London: Verso.(1920) The Behavior of Crowds: A Psychological Study. New York: Harper. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10905-000(2009) ‘Sexual tourism and the excitement of the strange’, Sexualities12(1): 97–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363460708099115and (2009) The Situationists and the City. London: Verso.et al. (2011) Magical Marxism. London: Pluto.(1962) Political Parties. New York: The Free Press.(1993) ‘John Donne's people: Explaining difference between rational actors and altruists through cognitive frameworks’, Journal of Politics53(2): 394–433.(2010) The Age of the Crowd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1983) Tia Ciata: A pequena Africa no Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Fundacao Nacional de Arte.(2010) Dead Aid. London: Penguin.(2011) ‘Mardi Gras festival goes straight and loses the alphabet soup’, Sydney Morning Herald, 18.11.2011.([Page 194]2008) ‘Global citizenship as show business: The cultural politics of Make Poverty History’, Media, Culture & Society30(2): 167–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443707086859(2004) ‘Global games: Culture, political economy and sport in the globalized world in the 21st century’, Third World Quarterly25(7): 1325–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014365904200281302(2008) Is There Hope for Uncle Sam?London: Zed.(2007) ‘Back the bid: The 2012 summer games and the governance of London’, Journal of Urban Affairs29(3): 255–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00342.x(2006) ‘Bono, tax avoider’, Slate, 31.10.2006.(1982) Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064(2002) ‘The Sydney 2002 Olympics and urban entrepreneurialism’, Australian Geographical Studies40(3): 563–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8470.00183(2009) ‘Preventable catastrophe? The Hurricane Katrina disaster revisited’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management17(4): 206–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00588.x, , and (1983) Leisure and Work. London: Allen & Unwin.(2006) ‘Blair, Brown and the Gleneagles agenda: Making poverty history, or confronting the global politics of unequal development?’, International Affairs82(5): 917–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00578.x(2011) ‘Top earners doubled share of nation's income, study finds’, New York Times, 25.10.2011.(1999) The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School.and (1999) ‘Imitating uniqueness: How big cities organize big events’, Organization Studies20(1): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084060002000702and (2010) War Games. London: Viking.(1999) ‘Why corporations sponsor the Olympics’, Journal of Promotion Management5(1): 15–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J057v05n01_02and (1968) The Open Society and its Enemies: The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath ((4th edition). London: Routledge.2011) ‘G8 Summit: David Cameron defends foreign aid spending’, Daily Telegraph, 27.05.2011.(Poynter, G. and MacRury, I. (eds) (2009) Olympic Cities: 2012 and the remaking of London. Farnham: Ashgate.2007) ‘The conceptualization and measurement of mega sport event legacies’, Journal of Sport & Tourism12(3): 207–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14775080701736957(1985) ‘The samba schools of Rio de Janeiro or the domestication of the masses’, Diogenes33(1): 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/039219218503312901(2006) ‘World's richest own 1% of all wealth, UN report discovers’, The Guardian.(2002) ‘Understanding the role of the stakeholder in event management’, Event Research Conference, UTS Sydney.and (2011) ‘The gender politics of celebrity humanism in Africa’, International Feminist Journal of Politics13(1): 44–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2011.534661and (1981) ‘Samba negro, espoliacao branca: Um estudo das escolas de samba do Rio de Janeiro’, Universidade de Sao Paulo.(2004) The Leisure Industries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.(2011) ‘Legacies of the games: Did the Olympic glow last?’; at: http://www.playthegame.org.(2000) Mega-events and Modernity. London: Routledge.(2002) ‘Mega events, culture and modernity’, Cultural Policy5(1): 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286639809358087([Page 195]2010) The Labour of Leisure. London: Sage.(2011) Pop Music, Pop Culture. Cambridge: Polity.(2012) Fame Attack: The Inflation of Celebrity and its Consequences. London: Bloomsbury Academic.(2011) ‘Sensuous solidarities: Emotion, politics and performance in the clandestine insurgent rebel clown army’, Antipode, Online version: 1–29.(1995) ‘Embodying spirits of resistance’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers13: 471–98.and (2003) Professional Event Coordination. New York: Wiley.and (2010) ‘The facts behind G8 aid promises’, The Guardian, 4.07.2010.(2011) The Price of Civilization. London: Bodley Head.(1972) Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.(2005) ‘Mobilizing information and communications technologies for effective disaster warning: Lessons from the 2004 tsunami’, New Media & Society7(6): 731–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444805058159(2007) ‘Security and surveillance in the Athens 2004 Olympics’, International Criminal Justice Review, 17(3): 220–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1057567707306649(1998) Marxism and Human Nature. Abingdon: Routledge.(2005) ‘Katrina: The disaster and its doubles’, Anthropology Today21(6): 2–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2005.00392.x(2006) ‘St Bono the hypocrite?’, MailOnline, 11.08.2006.(2003) Respect. New York: Norton.(1948) ‘Mathematical theory of communication’, Bell System Technical Journal27: 379–23, 623–56.(2011) ‘Narrative, drama and charismatic leadership: The case of Apple's Steve Jobs’, Leadership, 7(1): 3–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742715010386777and (2008) Five Ring Circus: Myths and Realties of the Olympic Games. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.(1999) ‘The theft of Carnival: National spectacle and racial politics in Rio de Janeiro’, Cultural Anthropology14(1): 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.19184.108.40.206(1993) ‘The dark side of the gift’, Journal of Business Research28: 225–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2893%2990049-U, and (2009) ‘Life in the shadow of mega-events: Beijing summer Olympiad and its impact upon housing’, Journal of Asian Public Policy2(2): 122–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17516230903027872(2010) ‘Playing host is hard to do: The allure of the world stage and shiny new stadiums’, World Policy Journal27: 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/wopj.2011.27.4.59(2012) ‘Towards a sociological analysis of London 2012’, Sociology, 46(4): 733–48.(2008) Make Poverty History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230233638(1990) ‘All that melts into air is solid: The hokum of New Times’, Race & Class31(3): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030639689003100301(2010) ‘Life in “Tin Can Town” for the South Africans evicted ahead of World Cup’, The Guardian, 1.04.2010.(2007) ‘Cosmopolitan citizenship: Virtue, irony and worldliness’, European Journal of Social Theory10(1): 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368431006068755(1986) Politics and the Poetics of Transgression. London: Methuen.and (2010) ‘Warren Buffett on donation spree, gives $1.93 billion to charities’, International Business Times.([Page 196]2010) Freefall: America, Free Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York: Norton.(2009) The Spartacus War. London: Phoenix.(2002) ‘Bob, Bono and Tony: The popular artist as politician’, Media, Culture & Society24(2): 433–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400309(2011) Music and Politics. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) ‘Power and resistance in the governance of world football’, Journal of Sport & Social Issues22(3): 299–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019372398022003005and (2006) ‘The blame game: Racialized responses to Hurricane Katrina’, Du Bois Review3(1): 161–74.(2000) Event Management. Landsdowne SA: Juta Education.(1999) ‘Mega-events and impacts on tourism’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal17(4): 305–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154699781767738(2006) ‘Bono aid is making Africa sick’, Sunday Times, 1.01.2006.(1991) Customs in Common. London: Penguin.(2011) ‘The sound of escapism’, The Guardian, 19.07.2011.(1974) Post-industrial Society. London: Wildwood House.(2011) ‘The art of listening: Live Aid’, New Statesman, 8.07.2011.(2009) ‘Hurricane Katrina: Urban history from the eye of the storm’, Journal of Urban History35(5): 607–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0096144209336515and (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan virtues, globalization and patriotism’, Theory, Culture & Society19(1): 45–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327602128931215(2009) ‘Burning Man at Google: A cultural infrastructure for new media production’, New Media & Society11(1): 73–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444808099575(1987) ‘Carnival, ritual and play in Rio de Janeiro’. in A.Falassi (ed.) Time Out of Time: Essays on the Festival, pp. 74–90. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.(2002a) ‘The global complexities of September 11th’, Theory, Culture & Society19(4): 57–69.(2002b) The Tourist Gaze ((2nd edition). London: Sage.US Government Accountability Office (2010) Media Report. Washington DC: GAO.1985) ‘Bureaucrats take note’, The Times, 24.07.1985.(2010) ‘The 2010 Winter Olympic Games: (Re) framing protest’, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.(1975) The People's Game: A Social History of British Football. London: Allen & Unwin.(2010) ‘The charitable-giving divide’, New York Times, 22.08.2010.(1998) ‘Carnivals for elites? The cultural politics of arts festivals’, Progress in Human Geography22(1): 54–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913298672233886(2006) ‘A memo to the Democratic Member of the House of Government Reform Committee regarding new information about Katrina contracts’; at: http://oversight.house.(1978) Economy and Society, volumes 1 and 2. Berkley: University of California Press.(1980) ‘Gay bars as private spaces’, Landscape24(1): 9–16.(1981) ‘Commentary: Towards a geography of the gay community’, Journal of Cultural Geography1: 106–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873638109478645(1992) The Persistence of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2011) ‘Cornell West Says Occupy is critique of oligarchy’; at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world.([Page 197]2006) ‘Underestimated costs and overestimated benefits? Comparing the outcomes of sports mega-events in Canada and Japan’, Sociological Review54: 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00654.xand (1960) ‘Work, careers and social integration’, International Social Science Journal12: 145–60.(1970) The Action-Image of Society. London: Tavistock.(2007) ‘Festival evaluation: An exploration of seven UK arts festivals’, Leisure Management12(2): 187–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13606710701339520and (2009) ‘Evaluating event marketing’, Journal of Promotion Management15(1): 247–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10496490902892580(World Bank (2007) http://www.worldbank/org2004) Festival and Events Management. Oxford: Elsevier., , , and (2009) ‘The invisible violence of celebrity humanitarianism’, World Political Science Review5(1): 279–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1935-6226.1072(2005) ‘From samba schools to computer clubhouses’, Convergence11: 88–105.and (