Effective Grading Practices for Secondary Teachers


Dave Nagel

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Copyright


    To Kenneth Frank Nagel, my dad, who has taught me that life is only lived when you are standing inside the fire.


    In schools, there should be an 11th commandment, “Thou shall not touch my gradebook.” Without a doubt, grading is one of the most private, autonomous acts that takes place in a school. Those who venture into conversations about grading need to be well equipped to tackle these practices. There has never been a more critical topic to address than in school today. Once you open the door to grading conversations, you enter into conversations around instruction, assessment, engagement, motivation, and classroom management, to name a few. Leaders need to be prepared to engage colleagues in these conversations.

    Many of the current practices result in grades not truly reflecting student achievement; rather, they reflect a hodgepodge of components such as behavior, homework, and participation. The result? Students don’t have an accurate picture of what they’ve mastered in a course. This impacts students not only today but with their future postsecondary plans. The roadblock? It is that tradition is often what stands in the way of true reform. The time is now for change.

    There are numerous resources about grading and reporting. The hard work is not acknowledging the research, it is putting it into action. Nevertheless, what Dave Nagel has accomplished with his book is taking theory, adding the policy, and turning it into practices that work. When schools do adopt new policies and practices, you cannot overlook the fact that, while districts have many policies on the books, few, if any, impact teachers’ daily work. With this seminal work, educators will have the tools in their hands to tackle this 11th Commandment and it will serve as a catalyst for your school to identify your its mission and the purpose of grades. First, Dave tackles the question of why. Most teachers were winners in the traditional grading system and do not see the compelling reason for change. Decisions are based on experience versus evidence. Carefully, Dave helps schools develop their own why for change. In this process of transforming practices, teacher voice is needed, and this book provides key questions to gather that voice.

    Throughout this book, Dave provides vivid examples of grading scenarios, causing readers to pause and question their own practices—from the effectiveness of homework based on the latest research from John Hattie (2008, 2012) to Rick Stiggins and Jan Chappuis (2011). The examples make the case for schools to develop a clear set of grading parameters so that grades are truthful, reliable, and impartial. These parameters provide the basis for schools to be confident that grades are accurate and that there is a high level of consistency.

    Once you’ve determined your school’s mission for grading, Dave provides a framework for reducing failures by turning the tables and having the consequence for not doing the work be simply doing the work, perhaps with a stipulated second chance. Again, the theory needs to be put into practice, and Dave provides templates and examples on how schools can have more students learning at higher levels.

    The timing of this book is opportune as school are currently implementing new standards. Often, schools become stymied in their reform when they attempt to implement a full-blown standards-based report card rather than using standards-based strategies. As articulated by Dave Nagel, the latter lead to higher levels of accuracy while still maintaining traditional letter grades.

    Some may argue that now is not the time for a change, or this can wait until we’ve perfected our grading plan, or—a common theme—we need to wait for buy-in. However, each day students under traditional, flawed systems are impacted by antiquated and, at times, harmful practices. In this enlightening text, Dave Nagel paves the path for schools to, at last, take action!

    Jeffrey A. Erickson


    Kristin Anderson, director of professional learning at Corwin, has been influential in my journey as a professional developer and now published author. Her knowledge and passion about increasing the quality of education and the lives of children through working effectively with adults and increasing their learning has had a tremendous impact on me. She is by far one of the reasons why this project has come to fruition.

    Dr. BR Jones, superintendent of Tate County School District, in Tate County, Mississippi, has been both a colleague and a close personal friend for the past 5 years. His knowledge and drive to become the best learner he can be each and every day has served as a model for me in my path to authorship. He provided me with many quality insights that shaped my thinking for crafting many of the ideas contained in this book.

    Dan Alpert, senior acquisitions editor at Corwin, has been an exceptional mentor and friend during the process of becoming a first-time author. The expertise, knowledge, and time that he devotes and shares so unselfishly are an example for everyone. He desires only to help all his authors see their ideas come to light in order to shape the path for more students to be successful. I cannot thank him enough.

    Larry Ainsworth, international author, keynoter, and educational thought leader, has shaped virtually every part of my career as a professional developer and now author by example. I describe him as the best teacher I have ever met. He has always been there to help me in forming my thoughts into a message that can be transferred to others that is practical and useful.

    Finally, Kristen Nagel—my rock and my wife. For everything you do to support me and Nicholas (10), Zachary (5), and Jacob (3), without ever having to be acknowledged—simply thank you.

    Publisher’s Acknowledgments

    Corwin gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following reviewers:

    • David G. Daniels
    • Principal
    • Susquehanna Valley Senior High School
    • Conklin, NY
    • Martin J. Hudacs
    • Superintendent of Schools
    • Solanco School District
    • Quarryville, PA
    • Darryl L. Williams
    • Associate Superintendent of Middle Schools
    • Montgomery County Public Schools
    • Rockville, MD

    About the Author

    Dave Nagel is an international educational consultant and researcher. His educational career started as a middle school science and high school biology teacher. His administrative experiences involved being a middle school assistant principal, high school associate principal, and director of extended day and credit recovery programs. In his former district, Dave was instrumental in implementing power standards and performance assessments. He was honored numerous times as a “Senior Choice” winner, with graduating seniors selecting him as someone who dramatically affected their life in a positive way. His efforts in augmenting and implementing a multifaceted credit recovery model transformed Ben Davis High School (enrollment 3,400, Grades 10–12) from a middle-of-the-road high school in terms of diplomas awarded into a graduation factory. By focusing on differentiated goals for students based on specific proficiency measures, Ben Davis was able to improve its graduation rate 14% in just over 4 years. Dave has been a national and international presenter and consultant to schools for over 10 years. Using his experience and expertise, he has presented and helped schools, from pre-K through Grade 12, implement effective practices leading to gains in student achievement. His main focus when working with schools has revolved around assessment, instruction, leadership, and effective collaboration. He has worked specifically with schools in implementing the following topics: prioritizing standards, common formative assessments, building authentic performance tasks, effective use of scoring guides, data teams, rigorous curriculum design, and effective grading practices. In the past few years, Dave has done extensive work with teachers and leaders across the country assisting schools and entire districts through a proven process to identify essential Common Core State Standards and their relationship with state and local assessment results.Dave has also done extensive work around helping school teams work on critical aspects of effective collaboration. This has significantly impacted student achievement through focusing on intentional adult actions. Published multiple times in various publications such as Principal Leadership and Educational Leadership, Dave has also presented at various national conferences such as those hosted by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, National Staff Development Council, National Association of Secondary School Principals, and National School Boards Association. Dave stays very busy with his beautiful and supportive wife, Kristen, and three boys (ages 10, 5, and 3). Kristen works full time and does most of the raising of the children, and he is extremely grateful for her every day. He acknowledges every day that the Lord guides his actions and is the driving force in his life.

  • Appendixes

    Appendix A: Monitoring Grade Inflation and Deflation

    Data for the past decade have indicated that both grade inflation and deflation are prevalent in our high schools. While Chapter 5 dealt with failure prevention strategies to avoid unnecessary grade deflation, monitoring grade inflation is just as important. ACT (2005) concludes that between 1991 and 2003 high school grades inflated by 12.5%. Many students who leave their high schools with diplomas arrive on campus or in workforce postsecondary settings lacking the skills necessary to succeed. Former West Virginia Governor Bob Wise (2008, p. 220) estimates that the United States would realize an additional $3.7 billion in reduced expenditures and increased earnings if more students graduating from high school were prepared for college and did not require remediation.

    Using Internal and External Assessments as Monitoring Tools

    Middle and high schools need to have a system in place for specific times during the year to monitor the accuracy of grade reporting and distribution. This can be accomplished at the district, school, or team/classroom level. Schools and districts must ensure that teacher grades complement and don’t conflict with state or other external assessments (Guskey, 2009, p. 76). Schools can use data from external measures such as state tests, end-of-course assessments, SAT, ACT, PARCC, and Smarter Balanced assessments once they are fully implemented to determine if the grades teachers are reporting are aligned with external measures of students’ mastery of specific academic standards.

    Flood Light View

    Districts can compare grade distribution to external assessment results by individual teachers’ grades, by course, subject, or school to see how grades match. This type of analysis can offer districts and schools flood light views of how grades are aligning with student success on external measures. These are conducted only once or twice per year.

    Figure A.1 shows a quick example of some data points that districts, schools, departments, teams, and individual teachers can use to monitor grade distribution and how it compares with internal and external assessments. It also shows the frequency with which they can and should be used to determine if the grades we are administering are what we would expect based on other assessments.

    Flash Light Analysis

    Schools can get a deeper view of how specific PLCs’ or even individual classroom teachers’ grades are aligning with external assessments. Benchmark assessments that measure the specific standards and objectives aligned with the school’s curriculum can become a great quick gauge for monitoring both inflation and deflation across classrooms. NWEA, MAP, and Acuity are just a few of the assessments that are usually administered multiple times per year. These may be more useful than large-scale state or national assessments that occur usually only once a year. PLCs or other collaborative teacher teams can analyze how aligned their grade distribution is with internal measures.

    Figure A.1 Flood Light Frequency of Grade Distribution Monitoring

    Figure A.2 Flash Light Frequency of Grade Distribution Monitoring

    Activity A.1: Individual Teacher Grade Distribution Analysis

    Compare accuracy of grades to external measures such as national/state assessments, end-of-course assessments, SAT, and ACT for three teachers.

    Based on the three sets of students pulled from these teachers’ classrooms and comparing final semester grades and state assessment scores, what inferences, hypotheses, and conclusions can you make?

    *Credit recovery would indicate an “F” Grade.

    Teacher 1





    Teacher 2





    Teacher 3





    What questions do you have about the grading practices in all three of these classrooms?













    Appendix B: Summary of Practical Grading Examples/Strategies for Decreasing Failure

    Appendix C: Successful Credit Recovery: Many Paths, One Destination

    As schools continue to experiment with and adjust existing credit recovery programs in an attempt to minimize dropouts and increase graduation rates, several factors and considerations can contribute to their success. Whether schools choose a traditional route, one based online or otherwise on technology, or a hybrid that combines the two, effective teaching will lead to effective student learning. Figure C.1 highlights some benefits and drawbacks of online versus traditional credit recovery settings.

    Figure C.1 Traditional Versus Online Credit Recovery

    If schools determine they are going to use an online setting for credit recovery, they must decide whether to purchase their courses or create them internally. Here are a couple of questions schools may need to consider when determining if they should purchase or create courses:

    • Is it more important to get started than to get it perfect?
    • What courses are most important to have right now? Do we want core areas (e.g., language arts, math) in place ASAP? If so, we might choose to purchase those instead of build them.

    Figure C.2 highlights benefits and drawbacks of both.

    Considerations for Success Online

    Technology-based options for credit recovery have been expanding for the past decade and will continue to do so for some time. One of the overarching critiques of online learning for credit recovery is that there is the risk of shuffling students out the door without the full value of a high school education. Schools and districts should not concern themselves with perceptions that lack facts. Schools should not ask themselves, “Is our online environment for credit recovery the same experience as a classroom?” but rather, “Does our online environment allow our students to demonstrate mastery of standards?” All students have unique learning needs and strengths. In many formal online learning situations, students have performed academically equally well as or better than students in more traditional instructional settings (Lemke, Coughlin, & Reifsneider, 2009, p. 32).

    Figure C.2 Created Versus Purchased Online Courses

    Teacher-Student Connection Critical

    The most important influence on student learning in a school is that of the classroom teacher (Hattie, 2008). This does not change in an online setting. In their June 2008 report with the North American Council for Online Learning, Watson and Gemin mention that an effective predictor of student success in online settings is a high level of teacher involvement (p. 15). When schools simply purchase a slew of computers and courses because they are inexpensive in bulk, this most often leads to very low levels of teacher interaction. In these cases, schools are most likely to pass students because they are completing course requirements that are not always standards-based assignments. These settings can lead students to walk out having recovered their credit and learned little or nothing at all.

    Effective classroom instruction and formative assessment are the cornerstones of student learning. Online environments are just that—learning environments. Notwithstanding any extraordinary circumstances, one would not and should not assume that effective teaching for effective learning would not still need to be part of the recipe. Credit recovery environments are filled with learners who are there because of some degree of lack of success. These learners need intervention as soon as an issue arises. Online learning settings are less geared for teachers to intervene quickly compared to traditional classrooms. Schools must plan to create online environments that have high levels of teacher interaction and intervention if they hope for successful online credit recovery implementation. This may mean a balance whereby students can complete some of the coursework at home, but there is an on-site requirement as well. The following are examples of successful online credit recovery settings that have tackled some of the key roadblocks to success.

    Immediate Intervention

    Pine Ridge High School, in Volusia County, Florida, has an Apex lab where any of the school’s 2,200 students can work on courses needed to graduate (first time or recovery). Mrs. Feltner, who runs the program, gets an immediate email whenever students fail an online quiz, which allows her to intervene quickly. She feels that students who are struggling or are in a recovery situation are better served in an online lab where someone can step up and assist them right away. Students who are home with no one to help guide them will not receive the same level of support in developing or redeveloping critical skills (Trotter, 2008).

    Effective Alignment and Personalization

    Ector County, Texas, with a population of 26,000 students, uses a balance of paper-and-pencil and online models for credit recovery. Even the online courses that have been purchased are personalized. Ms. Rose Valderaz, the district’s director of the Virtual High School, shares that part of the mission in the credit recovery program is to make sure students have learned enough of the skills and concepts they missed so they can succeed in the subsequent course.

    Alignment and Losing Stigma

    Two challenges schools face in implementing online credit recovery are having alignment between traditional classes and the online versions and the stigma that students taking these courses are earning substandard credits. Aldine Independent School District, serving 60,000 students outside of Houston, addressed both when it hired some of its master teachers to collaborate on creating curriculum for online credit recovery courses. When teachers from the district created the courses for online credit recovery, they provided immediate creditability for students earning credits in the online format. They then mandated that all students earning an online recovery credit pass an established and rigorous final exam. This would be beyond what some students who earned their credit as first-time learners had to do (Watson & Gemin, 2008, p. 8).

    Pre-Assessments for Online Credit Recovery

    Most students in credit recovery settings do not need to repeat the entire course they recently failed. Schools need to know which skills the students have mastered and which they are still missing—their on- and off-ramps, so to speak. In the Kentucky Virtual High School, students take an abridged version of the course they recently failed. Prior to starting a credit recovery class, students complete an informal diagnostic. Based on the evidence from these assessments, students are placed in either full or abridged courses. The school has also established cutoffs for recovery versus repeat. Students who score below 50% are not eligible for the credit recovery program. They need to take the entire course over and are not eligible for the abridged version (Blackboard, 2009, p. 6).

    Appendix D: Using Common Core Speaking and Listening Standards as Feedback and Grading Targets for Student Collaboration and Participation

    Many secondary schools are also starting to address collaboration as a method for grading more effectively. Collaboration is a key 21st century skill that all teachers and administrators can likely improve upon, and it is one students need to be college and career ready. CCSSI (English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects) states:

    To become college and career ready, students must have ample opportunities to take part in a variety of rich, structured conversations—as part of a whole class, in small groups, and with a partner—built around important content in various domains. Whatever their intended major or profession, high school graduates will depend heavily on their ability to listen attentively to others so that they are able to build on others’ meritorious ideas while expressing their own clearly and persuasively. (p. 48)

    The Common Core speaking and listening standards provide teachers with concrete targets to assess students and give feedback on essential collaboration skills. These are essential for students to develop to become college and career ready. The Common Core spiraling provides clear learning progressions for teachers to use for feedback, for student self-assessment and growth, and for potential criterion-based grading targets.

    Figure D.1 Specific Speaking and Listening Standards Used in Creating the Student Assessment Below

    Figure D.2 Flash Light Frequency of Grade Distribution Monitoring

    Appendix E: Example of PLC/Grade-Level 100-Day Action Plan

    To create an effective short-term (3- to 4-month or 100- to 120-day) action plan, in which your actions show dramatic improvements in achievement in one element of your school’s grading practice adjustments or changes, the focus has to be on a few specific actions the teachers or PLC commit to and monitor.

    Some Important Points to Consider
    • Determine what actions will have the greatest impact on student achievement. For example, if you have taken the time to have teachers really ensure that they have identified the most essential critical standards for targeted instruction and assessment, then you would already have the basis for creating a rigorous, accurate, and fair selection syllabus to offer students as a clear guide for earning specific and understood grades.
    • Decide on the essential high-impact actions your team will implement as well as committed deadlines for accomplishing tasks.
    • Determine future dates for monitoring grading change actions and their impact.
    • Update your project weekly or by some predetermined interval.
    Example: High-impact actions that are to be employed in the plan to accomplish this goal:
    • Establish clear critical standards for 10th-grade language arts that are aligned with priorities for 11th and 12th grades.
    • Unwrap the essential and supporting standards to identify key concepts and skills as well as rigor levels.
    • Use text complexity as a gauge for helping students demonstrate mastery of concepts and skills, get through more difficult texts skills, maintain stamina, and see how they are acquiring points for the grade they are earning.
    • Create a specific structure for bimonthly meetings for the specific purpose of sharing success in student work as well as monitoring the behaviors of barometer students.
    • Create a specific structure, schedule, and protocol for collaborative scoring of student work.
    • Ensure that there are at least three rigorous common assessments to be administered across all four English 10 classrooms to monitor accuracy and fairness.

    Figure E.1 Partially Completed Short-Term PLC Action Plan for Implementing a Selection Syllabus

    Appendix F


    ACT. ( 2005 ). Are high school grades inflated? Issues in college readiness. Retrieved from https://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/issues.pdf
    ACT. ( 2010 ). College and career readiness report. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr11/pdf/ConditionofCollegeandCareerReadiness2011.pdf
    Ainsworth, L. ( 2003 ). Power standards: Identifying the standards that matter the most. Englewood, CO: Advanced Learning Press.
    Ainsworth, L. ( 2011 ). Rigorous curriculum design: How to create curricular units of study that align standards, instruction, and assessment. Englewood, CO: Advanced Learning Press.
    Ainsworth, L. , & Viegut, D. ( 2006 ). Common formative assessments: How to connect standards-based instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Allan, B. M. , & Fryer, R. G. ( 2011 ). The power and pitfalls of education incentives. Washington, DC: Hamilton Project.
    Allen, J. D. ( 2004 ). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(5), 218223.
    Allensworth, E. M. , & Easton, J. Q. ( 2005 ). The on-track indicator as a predictor of high school graduation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. Retrieved from https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/publications/p78.pdf
    Allensworth, E. , & Easton, J. ( 2007 ). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago Public High Schools: A close look at course grades, failures, and attendance in the freshman year. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/publications/07%20What%20Matters%20Final.pdf
    American Educational Research Association. ( 2004 ). Encyclopedia of Educational Research (
    ed.). Macmillan Library Reference: Macmillan USA.
    Amos, J. ( 2011, June 27 ). Alliance president Bob Wise on CNN’s Your Bottom Line. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/alliance-president-bob-wise-on-cnns-your-bottom-line/
    Balfanz, R. , Legters, N. , & Jordan, W. ( 2004 ). Catching up: Impact of the talent development ninth grade instructional interventions in reading and mathematics in high-poverty high schools. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students.
    Bang, H. , & Ross, S. ( 2009 ). Volunteer motivation and satisfaction. Retrieved from http://www.hrsm.sc.edu/jvem/v011n01/volunteermotivation.pdf
    Blackboard®K-12 ( 2009, June ). Credit recovery: Exploring answers to a national priority. Retrieved from https://www.blackboard.com/resources/k12/Bb_K12_WP_CreditRecovery.pdf
    Blankstein, A. ( 2012 ). Failure is not an option: 6 principles that advance student achievement in highly effective schools (
    ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Bolam, R. , McMahon, A. , Stoll, L. , Thomas, S. , & Wallace, M. ( 2005 ). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities (Research Report Number 637). London, UK: General Teaching Council for England, Department for Education and Skills.
    Bowers, M. ( 2009, October 15 ). Norfolk superintendent seeking feedback for possible changes to grading policy. Virginian-Pilot. Retrieved from http://hamptonroads.com
    Brookhart, S. ( 2011 ). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Butler, R. , & Nisan, M. ( 1986 ). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210216.
    Cahill, M. , Lynch, J. , & Hamilton, L. ( 2006 ). Multiple pathways research and development: Summary findings and strategic solutions for overage, under-credited youth. New York, NY: New York City Department of Education. Retrieved from http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/B5EC6D1C-F88A-4610-8F0F-A14D63420115/0/FindingsofOMPG.pdf
    Canady, R. L. (n.d.). Grading practices that increase/decrease the odds for student success: General grading information packet. Retrieved from http://www.schoolschedulingassociates.com/wp-content/uploads/canady/grading/Grading-Packet-10-11.pdf
    Carey, T. , & Carifio, J. ( 2012 ). The minimum grading controversy: Results of a quantitative study of seven years of grading data from an urban high school. Educational Researcher, 41(6), 201208.
    Carr, J. , & B. Farr . ( 2000 ). Taking steps toward standards-based report cards. In E. Trumbull & B. Farr (Eds.), Grading and reporting student progress in an age of standards (pp. 185208). Norwood, MS: Christopher Gordon.
    Center for Public Education. ( 2012 ). Credit recovery programs: Full report. Received from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Staffingstudents/Credit-recovery-programs/Credit-recovery-programs-full-report.html
    Chan, W. K. , & Mauborgne, R. ( 2003, January ). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org
    Cognard, A. M. ( 1996 ). The case for weighting grades and waiving classes for gifted and talented high school students. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/reports/rm96226/rm96226.pdf
    Collins, J. ( 2001 ). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap . . . and others don’t. New York, NY: Harper Business.
    Collins, J. ( 2011 ). Great by choice: Uncertainty, chaos, and luck-why some thrive despite them all. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
    Colvin, G. ( 2005, July 25 ). America isn’t ready (Here’s what to do about it). Fortune. Retrieved from http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/07/25/8266603/index.htm
    Common Core State Standards Initiative. ( 2014a ). English language arts standards: Anchor standards: College and career readiness: Anchor standards for reading. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/CCRA/R
    Common Core State Standards Initiative. ( 2014b ). English language arts standards: Speaking and listening: Grade 9–10. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/SL/9-10/
    Common Core State Standards Initiative. ( 2014c ). Standards for mathematical practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice
    Common Core State Standards Initiative. (n.d.). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects: Appendix B: Text exemplars and sample performance tasks. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_B.pdf
    Conley, D. T. ( 2000, April ). Who is proficient? The relationship between proficiency scores and grades. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
    Cooper, H. ( 1989 ). A synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 8591.
    Cooper, H. ( 2006 ). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents (
    ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Cooper, H. , Robinson, J. C. & Patall, E. A. ( 2006 ). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 162.
    Cooper, H. , Valentine, J. , Charlton, K. , & Melson, A. ( 2003 ). The effects of modified school calendars on student achievement and on school and community attitudes. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 152.
    Cox, R. ( 2009 ). “It was just that I was afraid”: Promoting success by addressing students’ fear of failure. Community College Review, 37(1), 5280.
    Csepiga, M. ( 2013 ). Tri-Creek School Board approves changes affecting valedictorians, weighted grades. NW Indiana Times. Retrieved from http://www.nwitimes.com
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. ( 1990 ). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY. HarperPerennial.
    Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2006 ). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120138.
    Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2010 ). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    Des Moines Public Schools. ( 2015 ). DMPS Secondary Grading Practices. Des Moines, IA: Author. Retrieved from http://grading.dmschools.org/uploads/1/0/4/8/10487804/dmps_grading_handbook_14-15.pdf
    Donnegan, B. ( 2008 ). The linchpin year. Educational Leadership, 65(8), 5457.
    Drews, T. , & Giles, P. ( 2002 ). Liberal arts degrees and the labour market. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 13, 2733.
    DuFour, R. , Dufour, R. , Eaker, R. , & Karhanek, G. ( 2004 ). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
    Duncan, C. R. , Noonan, B. , Simon, M. , Tierney, R. , Forgette-Giroux, R. , & Hachey, K. ( 2009 ). Comparing grading practices between secondary mathematics teachers in Ontario and Saskatchewan. Retrieved from http://www.mea.uottawa.ca/documents/CSSE-2009-RD.pdf
    EngageNY. ( 2012 ). Common Core shifts. Retrieved from https://www.engageny.org/resource/common-core-shifts
    ESPN. ( 2010 ). Joyce tops survey; players nix replay. Retrieved from http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=5281467
    Evans, W. , Oates, W. , & Schuab, R. ( 1992 ). Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 966991.
    Fergus, M. A. ( 2008 ). Some area high schools rethink valedictorian’s role in graduation, but student speakers remain. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com
    Fisher, D. , Frey, N. , & Pumpian, I. ( 2011 ). No penalties for practice. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 4651.
    Fontana Unified School Board. ( 2011 ). Secondary Grading Policy. Fontana, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fusd.net/district/schsupport/secondary/grading%20policy.pdf
    Friedman, S. ( 1998, April ). Grading teachers’ grading policies. NASSP Bulletin, pp. 7783.
    Fryer, R. G. , Levitt, S. D. , List, J. , & Sadoff, S. ( 2010 ). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment (Working Paper 18237). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://rady.ucsd.edu/docs/faculty/Fryer_et_al_Teacher_Incentives_NBER_WP18237_2012.pdf
    Gainey, D. D. , & Webb, L. D. ( 1998 ). The education leader’s role in change: How to proceed. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
    Gillespie, M. , Kim, B. , Oswald, F. , Ramsay, L. , & Schmitt, N. ( 2002 ). Biodata and situational judgment inventories as measures of college success: Developing and pilot testing phases. New York, NY: College Board.
    Godfrey, K. E. ( 2011 ). Investigating grade inflation and non-equivalence (Research Report 2011–2). New York, NY: College Board.
    Goodson, I. , & Hargreaves, A. ( 1996 ). Teachers’ professional lives. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
    Green, K. , & Emerson, W. A. ( 2007 ). A new framework for grading. Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 495511.
    Greene, J. P. , & Winters, M. A. ( 2007 ). Revisiting grade retention: An evaluation of Florida’s test-based promotion policy. Education and Finance Policy, 2, 319340.
    Griswold, P. A. ( 1993 ). Beliefs and inferences about grading elicited form student performance sketches. Educational Assessment, 1(4), 311328.
    Guskey, T. R. (Ed.). ( 1996 ). Communicating student learning: ASCD year book 1996. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Guskey, T. ( 2011 ). Stability and change in high school grades. NASSP Bulletin, 95(2), 8598.
    Guskey, T. , & Bailey, J. ( 2000 ). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Guskey, T. , & Bailey, J. ( 2010 ). Developing standards-based report cards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Guthrie, J. W. (Ed.). ( 2002 ). Encyclopedia of education. New York: Macmillan.
    Gwynne, S. C. ( 1992 ). The long haul. Time, 140(13), 3438.
    Hanover Research. ( 2011 ). Effective grading practices in the middle school and high school environments. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.apsva.us/cms/lib2/va01000586/centricity/domain/63/hanover_research_–_effective_grading_practices_in_the_middle_school_and_high_school_environments.pdf
    Hanover Research. ( 2013 ). Replacing “zero” grading at the secondary level. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://dumais.us/newtown/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Hanover_ReplacingZeroGrading.pdf
    Hattie, J. ( 2008 ). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis related to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Hattie, J. ( 2012 ). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Heath, C. , & Heath, D. ( 2010 ). Switch: How to change things when change is hard. New York, NY. Broadway Books.
    Heflebower, T. , Hoegh, J. , & Warrick, P. ( 2014 ). A school leader’s guide to standard based grading. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory.
    Henderson, N. ( 2013 ). Havens of resilience. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 2227.
    Holmes, C. T. ( 1989 ). Grade-level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (1633). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
    Howe, B. (Superintendent, Tri Creek Schools). Lowell: IN (personal interview, 2014 ).
    Indiana Department of Education. ( 2014 ). Science. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/standards/science
    Jacob, B. , & Lefgren, L. ( 2007 ). The effect of grade retention on high school completion (Working Paper No. 13514). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13514
    Jones, B. R. ( 2014 ). The focus model: Systematic school improvement for all schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Jumper, T. J. , Executive Director of Educator Quality and Leadership. Mason City High School, Mason City: IA (personal interview, 2014).
    Jussim, L. , & Eccles, J. ( 1992 ). Teacher expectations I: Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947961.
    Kahneman, D. ( 2011 ). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY. Farrarr, Straus and Giroux.
    Kessels, U. , Warner, L. M. , Holle, J. , & Hannover, B. ( 2008 ). Threat to identity through positive feedback about academic performance. Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padogogische Psychologie, 40(1), 2231.
    Kim, W. C. , & Mauborgne, R. ( 2003 ). Tipping point leadership. Harvard Business Review, 81, 6069.
    Kirschenbaum, A. , Simon, S. , & Napier, R. ( 1971 ). Wad-ja-get? The grading game in American education. New York, NY: Hart.
    Kluger A. , & DeNisi A. ( 1998 ). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3), 6772.
    Kurutz, R. D. ( 2013 ). Many high schools in W.Pa. move away from naming single valedictorian. Triblive.com. Retrieved from http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/4097048–74/class-students-valedictorian#ixzz3BmvkWvGx
    Lang, D. ( 2007 ). Class rank, GPA, and valedictorians: How high schools rank students. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 3648.
    Lemke, C. , Coughlin, E. , & Reifsneider, D. ( 2009 ). Technology in schools: What the research says: An update. Culver City, CA: Cisco.
    Lavy, V. , & Schlosser, A. ( 2007 ). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school (NBER Working Paper No. 13292). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13292
    Major League Baseball. ( 2013 ). Official baseball rules. Retrieved from http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/downloads/y2013/official_baseball_rules.pdf
    Mansell, W. ( 2009, September 23 ). Research reveals teaching’s holy grail. Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved from https://www.tes.co.uk
    Martindale, S. ( 2012 ). School principal alters grades without teacher’s consent. Orange County Register. Retrieved from http://www.ocregister.com
    Marzano, R. ( 2006 ). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Marzano, R. ( 2007 ). The art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Marzano, R. , Pickering, D. , & Pollock, J. ( 2001 ). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Matthews, J. ( 2013, December 15 ). D.C. teacher quits over grading, disruption. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com
    Maxwell, L. ( 2013, February 4 ). Texas district goes door to door to find dropouts. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org
    Merriam-Webster. ( 2014a ). Develop. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-web ster.com/dictionary/develop
    Merriam-Webster. ( 2014b ). Policy. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/policy
    Mertler, C. ( 2014 ). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Metropolitan School District of Wayne Township. ( 2015 ). Grading Scale. Indianapolis, IN: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wayne.k12.in.us/district/grading-scale.asp
    Metz, M. H. , & Page, R. N. ( 2002 ). The uses of practitioner research and status issues in educational research: Reply to Gary Anderson. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 2627.
    Middleton, W. ( 1933 ). Some general trends in grading procedure. Education, 54(1), 510.
    Minnema, E. ( 2007 ). An investigation of data driven practices at the high school level (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
    Mosher, F. ( 2011 ). The role of learning progressions in standards-based education reform (CPRE Policy Brief #RB-52). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/role-learning-progressions-standards-based-education-reform
    Nagel, D. ( 2008 ). Giving high school students more time. Principal Leadership, 8(7), 2931.
    Nagel, D. ( 2010 ). Built-in remediation. Educational Leadership, 68(2), 6667.
    National Association for College Admission Counseling. ( 2013 ). State of college admission report. Retrieved from http://www.nacacnet.org/research/PublicationsResources/Marketplace/research/Pages/StateofCollegeAdmission.aspx
    National High School Center. (n.d.). Early warning system high school tool. Retrieved from http://www.betterhighschools.org/EWSTool.aspx
    Nield, R. C. , & Balfanz, R. ( 2006 ). Unfulfilled promise: The dimensions and characteristics of Philadelphia’s dropout crisis, 2000–2005. Retrieved from http://www.csos.jhu.edu/new/Neild_Balfanz_06.pdf
    O’Connor, K. ( 2009 ). How to grade for learning, K–12 (
    ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    O’Connor, K. ( 2010 ). A repair kit for grading: Fifteen fixes for broken grades (
    ed.). Boston, MA. Pearson Education.
    Orfield, G. ( 2004 ). Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Page, E. B. ( 1958 ). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49(4), 173181.
    Paluska, M. ( 2013 ). Henry County schools superintendent dodges questions about grade changes. CBS46. Retrieved from http://www.cbs46.com
    Pape, L. , & Wicks, M. ( 2012 ). National standards for quality online programs. Vienna, VA: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
    Parker, S. ( 2013, June 26 ). Fed up teachers refuse to teach summer school in Texas. Retrieved from http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/06/26/summer-school-dallas-no-teachers
    Patall, E. A. , Cooper, H. , & Robinson, J. C. ( 2008 ). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychology Bulletin, 134, 270300.
    Pauly, M. , ( 2009 ). One principal’s self-study: Facilitating collaborative analysis of student work to inform teaching and learning (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3372099)
    Perkins-Gough, D. ( 2013 ). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71(1),
    Pink, D. ( 2011 ). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
    Pink, D. ( 2012 ). To sell is human: The surprising truth about moving others. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
    Popham, W. J. ( 2008 ). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Purdue University. ( 2014 ). Academic regulations and procedures: Grades and grade reports. Retrieved from http://www.purdue.edu/studentregulations/regulations_procedures/grades.html
    Qualia, R. & Corso, M. ( 2014 ). Student voice: The instrument of change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Raznov, G. B. ( 1987 ). High school teachers’ needs, attitudes, and actions in response to comprehensive change: The standardized curriculum policy of the School District of Philadelphia. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI8714114
    Reeves, D. ( 2004 ). The case against the zero. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 324325.
    Reeves, D. ( 2008 ). Leading to change/effective grading practices. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 8587.
    Reeves, D. ( 2009 ). Leading change in your school: How to conquer myths, build commitment, and get results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
    Reeves, D. ( 2011a ). Elements of grading: A guide to effective practice. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
    Reeves, D. ( 2011b ). Skeptics and cynics. American School Board Journal, 198(10), 40.
    Reeves, D. ( 2012, July ). The ketchup solution. American School Board Journal, pp. 3536.
    Robbins, A. ( 1996 ). Anthony Robbins’ personal power II: The driving force! (Audio CD). Robbins Research International.
    Robelen, E. ( 2010, June 29 ). Texas judge says no to minimum-grading policy. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org
    Robinson, V. , & Lei, M. K. ( 2006 ). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Roderick, M. , & Camburn, C. ( 1999 ). Risk and Recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 303343.
    Rose, S. ( 2012 ). Third grade reading policies. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/03/47/10347.pdf
    Rose, S. & Schimke, K. ( 2012 ). Third grade literacy policies: Identification, intervention, retention. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535949.pdf
    Rosenthal, R. , & Jacobson, L. ( 2003 ). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Wales, UK: Crown House.
    Rubie-Davies, C. ( 2008 ). Teacher expectations. In T. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 254265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Sadler, P. , & Tai, R. ( 2007 ). Weighting for recognition: Accounting for advanced placement and honors courses when calculating high school grade point average. NASSP Bulletin, 91(1), 532.
    Sarasota County School Board. ( 2015 ). Middle School Student Progression Plan (Grades 6–8). Sarasota, FL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.sarasotacountyschools.net/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=22332
    Schmidt, A. ( 2007 ). High-school students aim higher without learning more, federal studies find. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(27), A32.
    Schmoker, M. ( 2006 ). Results now: How we can achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Schneider, M. ( 2010 ). Finishing the first lap: The cost of first-year student attrition in America’s four-year colleges and universities. Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research.
    Shannon, G. S. , & Bylsma, P. ( 2007 ). Nine characteristics of high-performing schools: A research based resource for schools and districts to assist with improving student learning (
    Ed.). Olympia, WA: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
    Shedd, J. ( 2003 ). The history of the student credit hour. New Directions for Higher Education, 2003(122), 512.
    Simmons, K. , & Sutter, D. ( 2005 ). WSR-88D radar, tornado warnings, and tornado casualties. Weather and Forecasting, 20, 301310. Retrieved from http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/users/brooks/public_html/feda/papers/simmon
    Smith, M. (Principal, North High School), Van Der Wall, J. (School Improvement Coordinator, North High School), & Vukovich, M. (Associate Principal, North High School). Des Moines: IA (personal interview, 2014 ).
    Southwell, S. ( 2013 ). Updated: Some LISD parents upset over draft middle school grading policy. Lewisville Texan Journal. Retrieved from http://lewisvilletexan.com
    St. George, D. ( 2014, March 10 ). Math exam failure persists in Montgomery, even as efforts are underway to help. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com
    St. Louis Board of Education. ( 2012 ). Draft promotion and retention policy and regulation 2012–2013. Retrieved from http://www.slps.org/cms/lib03/MO01001157/Centricity/Domain/3688/Proposed%20Promotion%20and%20Retention%20Policy.pdf
    Starch, D. , & Elliott, E. C. ( 1913 ). Reliability of the grading of high school work in mathematics. School Review, 21, 254259.
    Stiggins, R. ( 2005 ). Student-involved assessment for learning (
    ed.). Boston, MA. Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
    Stiggins, R. J. , Arter, J. A. , Chappuis, J. , & Chappuis, S. ( 2004 ). Classroom assessment FOR student learning: Doing it right—using it well. Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute.
    Stiggins, R. , & Chappuis, J. ( 2011 ). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning (
    ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
    Stoll, L. , Bolam, R. , McMahon, A. , Wallace, M. , & Thomas, S. ( 2006 ). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221258.
    Stutz, T. ( 2010, November 26 ). School districts drop fight over truth-in-grading law. Dallas Morning News. Retrieved from http://www.dallasnews.com
    Sum, A. , Khatiwada, I. , & McLaughlin, J. (with Palma, S ). ( 2009 ). The consequences of dropping out of high school: Joblessness and jailing for high school dropouts and the high cost for taxpayers. Boston, MA: Northeastern University, Center for Labor Market Studies. Retrieved from http://www.northeastern.edu/clms/wp-content/uploads/The_Consequences_of_Dropping_Out_of_High_School.pdf
    Symonds, W. C. , Schwartz, R. , & Ferguson, R. ( 2011 ). Pathways to prosperity: Meeting the challenge of preparing young Americans for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education, Pathways to Prosperity Project. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4740480/Pathways_to_Prosperity_Feb2011–1.pdf?sequence=1
    Tan, S. ( 2013, June 17 ). Buffalo graduation rates sank to 47 percent in 2012. Buffalo News. Retrieved from http://www.buffalonews.com
    Texas AFT. ( 2012, November 27 ). New pre-filed legislation: Banning grade inflation. Retrieved from http://www.texasaft.org/new-pre-filed-legislation-banning-grade-inflation/#sthash.mfcvGl19.dpuf
    Tierney, R. ( 2011 ). Insights into fairness in classroom assessment: Experienced English teachers share practical wisdom. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1157097/Insights_into_Fairness_in_Classroom_Assessment_Experienced_English_Teachers_Share_their_Practical_Wisdom
    Tomlinson, C. A. , & Imbeau, M. B. ( 2013 ). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Trotter, A. ( 2008, May 19 ). Online options for “credit recovery” widen. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org
    Truog, A. L. , & Friedman, S. J. ( 1996, April ). Evaluating high school teachers’ written grading policies from a measurement perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
    Valedictorian, you’re retired. ( 2012, August 20 ). Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.chicagotribune.com
    Vatterott, C. ( 2009 ). Rethinking homework: Best practices that support diverse needs. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Viadero, D. ( 2009 ). Turnover in principalship focus of research. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org
    Vickers, J. ( 2000 ). Justice and truth in grades and their averages. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 141164.
    Wang, A. ( 2012 ). Some schools removing valedictorian title: Districts break tradition, honor more students. Azcentral.com. Retrieved from http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/04/26/20120426valedictorian-title-erased.html
    Watson, J. , & Gemin, B. ( 2008, June ). Promising practices in online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. North American Council For Online Learning. Retrieved from http://www.k12hsn.org/files/research/Online_Learning/NACOL_CreditRecovery_PromisingPractices.pdf
    Webster, K. L. ( 2011 ). High school grading practices: Teacher leaders reflections, insights, and recommendations. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
    Welsh, M. E. , & D’Agostino, J. ( 2009 ). Fostering consistency between standards-based grades and large-scale assessment results. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading (pp. 75104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Wiggins, G. , McTighe, G. , & McTighe, J. ( 1998 ). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Design.
    Wise, B. ( 2008 ). Raising the grade. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Wormell, 8i, R. ( 2006 ). Fair isn’t always equal: Assessing and grading in the differentiated classroom. Portland, ME. National Middle School Association.
    Yazzie-Mintz, E. ( 2010 ). Charting the path from engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Center for Evaluation and Education Policy. Retrieved from http://ceep.indiana.edu/hssse/images/HSSSE_2010_Report.pdf
    Zehr, M. A. ( 2012, March 23 ). Districts embracing online credit-recovery options. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org
    Zoeckler, L. ( 2005 ). Moral dimensions of grading in high school English (Doctoral dis sertation, Indiana University). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/7144/umi-indiana-1163.pdf?sequence=1

    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website