Developing Mindful Students, Skillful Thinkers, Thoughtful Schools

Books

Martin Buoncristiani & Patricia Buoncristiani

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Foreword

    Drawing on our knowledge of the forces of nature, we know that opposites attract. And that's one reason why this book is so attractive. The authors originate from opposite hemispheres. Martin is from North America, while Pat is from Australia. Thus, their view of education, thinking, and learning reflects a global perspective. But hemisphericity doesn't stop there.

    The two hemispheres of the brain have different functions. The left side of the brain is the logical hemisphere; it is analytical, rational, and is particularly involved in language. Martin's background experience is in science and engineering—logical, sequential, and mathematical.

    The right side of the brain is the creative and intuitive hemisphere, gathering information from images and interpreting patterns and body language, emotional content, and tone of voice. Pat's background is education and literacy—relational, creative, and intuitive.

    People often describe themselves as either left-brained or right-brained, but in reality we all use both sides of our brains, and we learn best when both sides work together to analyze and synthesize experiences and information. And that is another reason why this book is so powerful. Both authors work together to help us understand effective, critical, creative, skillful thinking; to make application to schools, classrooms, and learners; and to build more thoughtful world futures.

    Their mutually supportive views and vast experiences weave together the neuroscientific research about the ways the brain develops over time and operates when solving problems. They offer numerous educational applications for teachers and curriculum workers to more expertly create classroom conditions, instructional strategies, and curriculum maps that liberate learners' creative potentials, enhance rational decision making, and develop their propensity for continuous lifelong learning.

    At the center of their message is the plea to focus energies on the development of that uniquely human capacity, metacognition—being aware of, monitoring, and evaluating one's own thinking. They, along with numerous neuroscientists and cognitive psychologists, believe that humans possess the potential for becoming more “mindful” about the self-regulation of their minds.

    These thinking skills and Habits of Mind are not just “kid stuff.” The capacity for greater mindfulness extends to adults as continuous learners as well as to students who are in the process of becoming continuous learners. Effective, conscious teachers monitor themselves, their intentions, their questions, their nonjudgmental response behaviors, and the effects that are produced in their students. Teachers are deliberate in their planning and in their application and tracking of diverse instructional strategies that fit the unique styles and developmental levels of their students.

    With proper instruction, students too can learn to control and direct these executive processes. Thus, the thinking skills and Habits of Mind described in this book may serve as an internal compass that mindful humans employ when confronted with problematic situations by asking themselves, “What is the most intelligent thing I can do right now?”

    • How might I learn from this? What are my resources? How can I draw on my past successes with problems like this? What do I already know about the problem? What resources do I have available or need to generate?
    • How might I approach this problem flexibly? How might I look at the situation in another way? How can I draw upon my repertoire of problem-solving strategies? How can I look at this problem from a fresh perspective (lateral thinking)?
    • How might I illuminate this problem to make it clearer or more precise? Do I need to check out my data sources? How might I break this problem down into its component parts and develop a strategy for understanding and accomplishing each step?
    • What do I know or not know? What questions do I need to ask? What strategies are in my mind now? What am I aware of in terms of my own beliefs, values, and goals with this problem? What feelings or emotions am I aware of that might be blocking or enhancing my progress?
    • The interdependent thinker might turn to others for help. He or she might ask: How does this problem affect others? How can we solve it together, and what can I learn from others that would help me become a better problem solver?

    Taking a reflective stance in the midst of active problem solving is often difficult. There is no such thing as perfect mindfulness. It is an ideal state toward which we constantly aspire. While every human is capable of generating self-reflective consciousness, not everyone seems to use it equally. The intent of this book is to provide strategies, tools, and resources for parents, teachers, and organizational leaders to enhance those conditions that will continually grow and develop these cognitive capacities in all individuals in the organization.

    Educators today are being admonished and even coerced to abide by state and federal mandates to teach toward achievement tests, to follow scripted lessons, to categorize and label students, and to succumb to teacher evaluation and “politically correct” laws and policies that demean students and demoralize teachers. The authors' goal for education, therefore, is to support teachers and students in liberating, developing, and habituating these human intellectual capacities more fully. Taken together, these capacities are a force directing us toward increasingly authentic, congruent, and ethical behavior, the touchstones of integrity. They are the tools of disciplined choice making. They are the primary vehicles in the lifelong journey toward integration. They are the “right stuff” that makes human beings efficacious.

    The authors are among a growing alliance of global mind workers who are endeavoring to make the world a more compassionate, cooperative, and thought-full place. This book provides a compelling invitation to join this crusade.

    Arthur L.Costa EdD Professor Emeritus, California State University, Sacramento

    Preface: To Become a Nation of Skillful Thinkers

    We, as teachers, find ourselves facing a continual reinvention of our educational systems. But revised curricula, new testing mandates, increased levels of accountability, and rapidly evolving educational technology don't seem to be pulling us out of the malaise that bedevils us at the speed that the world demands. Perhaps we have been looking in the wrong places.

    In this book we offer a unique perspective on the teaching of thinking because

    • The ability to think metacognitively is essential if we expect our students to be prepared to live productively in a rapidly changing world. This book focuses on the teaching of metacognition to children so they will become more skillful thinkers and independent, lifelong learners.
    • This book provides an easy access to the theories underlying classroom practices. Teachers who read this book will understand why they do what they do.
    • This book demonstrates practical ways in which school and home can cooperate to create vibrant learning communities.
    Our Rationale for Writing This Book

    The United States of America has forged a powerful presence in the world based primarily on the strength of our economy. Our economic growth over the last century was due predominantly to developing new technologies. “Economic studies conducted even before the information-technology revolution have shown that as much as 85% of measured growth in U.S. income per capita was due to technological change” (National Research Council, 2006, p. 1). Our continued success in an increasingly global economy must be built on the foundation of a skilled and innovative next generation. There is growing evidence that we may not be producing that generation with our current educational practices.

    An awareness that something is seriously amiss in education in the United States prompted legislators to ask the National Academy of Science to review the current condition of U.S. science education and to recommend the top 10 actions that Congress might take to insure that we remain leaders in innovation. The preamble to the ensuing report Rising Above the Gathering Storm (National Research Council, 2006) states, “Having reviewed trends in the United States and abroad, the committee is deeply concerned that the scientific and technological building blocks critical to our economic leadership are eroding at a time when many other nations are gathering strength” (p. 3). Norman Augustine, chairman of the committee producing this report, stated further that America today faces a serious and intensifying challenge with regard to its future competitiveness and standard of living and that we appear to be on a losing path.

    Thomson Reuters Research Analytics tracks trends and performance in basic research. It has compiled comparative data from 1981 to 2009 measuring the production of research papers in science, engineering, and materials science from countries throughout the world. This information was released in two reports appearing in 2005 and 2010 (Adams & Pendlebury, 2010; “U. S. slide in world share continues,” 2005). The first of these reports, from the online magazine Science Watch, shows

    • a steady decline in the U.S. contribution to world science,
    • a steady increase in the contribution from Asia Pacific countries, and
    • a relatively constant contribution from EU countries.

    The 2010 report shows that

    the 20th century was largely dominated by the U.S. as a major powerhouse of scientific research and innovation, with 40% of the papers indexed in the Web of Science fielded by U.S. scientists in the 1990s. By 2009, that figure was down to 29%. The U.S. now struggles to keep pace with increased output from Europe and Asia. Yet research impact and the overall reputation of higher education institutions in the U.S. remain strong. (Thomson Reuters, n.d.)

    This trend is mirrored in the growing production of PhDs in science, mathematics, and technology in China compared to the declining numbers in the United States. Our nation faces a future in which it is no longer dominant in the fields of science, mathematics, and engineering.

    Further, evidence of the unsatisfactory academic performance of U.S. students comes from a major international study of student progress, the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). This test, developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, examines students from the major developed countries—countries responsible for roughly 90% of the world economy. PISA tests 15-year-olds in mathematics, science, and reading every three years. The United States consistently performs at or below the average in each of these three subject areas, despite the fact that we spend more per capita on education than almost every other developed nation.

    The United States performs a bit better on another test, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), which tests students in grades 4 and 8 every four years. However, the cultural diversity in TIMMS is very wide, including countries like Botswana, Mongolia, Denmark, Australia, Palestine, England, and Canada. In addition, the focus of the two tests are significantly different; PISA measures the ability of students to apply their knowledge and skills to meet real-life challenges, whereas TIMMS measures the extent to which students have mastered the taught curriculum (Gonzales et al., 2004; Programme for International Student Assessment, 2003).

    Our survival as a major economic and political power in the world is at risk if we cannot maintain our global competitiveness with a well-educated next generation. It simply isn't good enough that, when our 15-year-olds are asked to apply their learning, they perform at or below average compared with the rest of the developed world.

    That is the bad news; now here is the good news. At a time when we face this growing global challenge from the developing world, our emerging understanding of the human brain provides a means to rise to this challenge. Research from a variety of disciplines has produced a new picture of how the brain operates and how it learns most effectively, a picture that emphasizes the brain's plasticity —it is an organ capable of continuous improvement and change. This new knowledge not only helps to explain how the brain operates, it also provides a means of self-understanding that can lead to new ways of learning—the skill of metacognition. Educational practices need to move beyond endless reforms of curriculum and assessment and accountability measures and incorporate these new understandings into the ways in which we do things in our schools and colleges.

    The Focus of the Book Is on Thinking About Thinking

    So this is a book about metacognition, a long word which means thinking about how we think. It is an important concept because it is only by thinking about how we think that we can consciously and continuously improve our thinking. It is the only way to become skillful thinkers and independent learners.

    The book is directed to teachers and school administrators who want to see their students transformed into skillful thinkers and their schools transformed into thoughtful and thought-filled places of learning. Skillful thinkers can adapt their thinking to new situations and transform what they learn in one context into another. When faced with new problems, they can formulate a plan of action and proceed to a solution. In a society where readiness for work is an increasingly significant factor in educational planning, we need to remain alert to the fact that if we train a young person with the skills required for a particular job and that job disappears, then he is trained for something that no longer exists. But if we educate young people who are flexible, metacognitive thinkers, they will be able to adapt their learning and find their way successfully in new territory.

    Chapter 1 discusses the two major forces acting to change traditional education: first, the knowledge that the brain is plastic, which implies that we need to teach students how to use this flexibility, and how to think about their thinking so they can control their learning; and second, the global revolution in information and communication technology, which is changing the way people work, which in turn mandates a change in how students are prepared in order to deal with this changing workplace. In fact, many of the jobs that students entering school for the first time this year will be expected to fill a decade and a half later are not even defined yet.

    Chapter 2 summarizes the relevant brain research on how people learn and introduces the principles of metacognition that underlie this work. We provide sufficient depth to justify the techniques for enhanced learning that follow and point readers to additional resources, should they wish to delve deeper.

    Chapters 3, 4, 5, and 6 deal directly with metacognition, defining it carefully, deconstructing it into its constituents, and finally discussing the importance of language to metacognition. Chapters 7 and 8 focus on the implementation of metacognition, first in problem solving and then in the organization of knowledge. The final three chapters, 9, 10, and 11, provide strategies and tools for teaching thinking. Chapter 9 looks particularly at the role of questioning in eliciting metacognition and deeper levels of thinking. Chapter 10 provides some very practical strategies both for metacognitive note taking and for assessment that recognize the significance of metacognition, and in Chapter 11 we examine what schools can do to create a culture of metacognitive thinking throughout the school and in partnerships in learning with parents.

    The final section provides a set of practical resources for teachers to help encourage metacognition with their students. It also provides materials schools can use to encourage and inform parents of ways they can participate in their children's learning.

    A Personal Perspective on How We Came to Write This Book

    In a time when lives are lived at a fast pace and dinner-table conversation has become a rarity in many households, we have stuck to the old traditions and share our thoughts about events of the day around the dinner table in the evening. It was these conversations that provided the genesis of this book. We often began discussions that grew out of our own frustrations as educators.

    Pat was an elementary school principal in the United States. She would describe the difficulties of trying to create a productive learning environment in a low-achieving and disadvantaged school. The problems seemed to come from every level: difficulties with parents, with students, with teachers, and with administrators.

    At the same time Martin, a university professor of physics, was struggling to help his students achieve a conceptual understanding of science. While these students learned facts and simple procedures easily, when faced with questions or problems that required a deeper understanding of the concepts involved, they faltered. As these discussions progressed, it became clear to us that the problems of these two different pedagogical situations had similar roots. Both had to do with thinking.

    In a system relentlessly focused on standardized test results, school accreditation, and data analysis, Pat was fearful that there was so much focus on the development of test-taking skills, the memorization of content, and the learning of routines and formulaic responses to test questions that the teaching of skillful thinking and understanding was taking a back seat. Awakening in students an understanding of their own thinking processes and teaching them how to think skillfully is a complex, time-consuming process. There never seemed to be time for this as pressures increased to cover curriculum content before the next round of testing.

    When the school district brought Dr. Arthur Costa to provide professional development to principals, it was an “Aha!” moment. Costa introduced a list of habits or dispositions that characterize the behavior of successful people facing complex problems. He called this list the Habits of Mind. It became crystal clear that the path to lifelong, independent learning had to include the teaching of thinking. It was not an optional extra, but was fundamental to the success of every other kind of learning. Without the teaching of thinking, all of the test taking and passing in the world would not develop lifelong learning skills. It also became clear that this was not just something that applied only to schoolchildren.

    All the adults involved in the endeavor—the parents, the teachers and the administrators—needed to be skilled thinkers as well. Skilled thinking needed to be part of the world outside the classroom—in government, in civic responsibility and participation, and in the workplace. The Habits of Mind provide a structure within which educators, parents, and the wider community can organize all the things we know to be so important about learning but have been in danger of forgetting. It also finally gives us a straightforward, jargon-free language that will enable us to talk about our thinking.

    Over the last 20 years, Martin's primary concern in teaching physics at the university level had been to have students come to understand underlying concepts. It was not too difficult to teach students to solve simple physics problems expressed verbally, to plug in the numbers and turn the mathematical crank. But when students were asked questions that involved a deeper understanding of underlying concepts, they often became confused about what was being asked. They seemed to have no clear thinking procedures they could apply to sort out their confusion. For example, in learning about motion, students learn about how objects move under the influence of gravity near the surface of the earth—about the flight of soccer balls and such. At another point they also learn about the forces required to keep an object moving in a circle. They are able to understand each of these two concepts individually. However, when faced with a question like “Why does an object dropped near the surface of the earth fall while the same object dropped in a space capsule floats?” many students respond by stating that gravity at the space capsule is much weaker than on earth. In fact, the gravitational force is only about 5% less in a low-earth orbit. Students found it difficult to combine their understanding of gravity and circular motion to answer the question; moreover, they often didn't know what steps to take to resolve the question.

    Martin tried to engage the students in classroom discussions about how they were thinking, but it became clear that the content language, the language of physics and mathematics, was not sufficient to address all aspects of the students' thinking. Something else was needed. When Pat told him about Art Costa's visit to her school district and the Habits of Mind, he too saw the light. Together they began a systematic exploration of what else in addition to content is needed to engage students in a discussion about their own thinking and learning and, in the process, deepen conceptual learning. The result of that exploration is this book.

    We were most influenced by three specific pieces of work: the National Research Council reports on How People Learn, the circle of ideas surrounding the Habits of Mind of Costa and Kallick, and the metastudies by the Mid-Continent Regional Education Laboratory and Robert Marzano describing effective teaching and learning strategies.

    The How People Learn series explores the research of a broad range of experts in most aspects of learning (National Research Council, 1999, 2000, 2005). Its findings clarify the three most fundamental aspects of flexible learning:

    • understanding and dealing with prior knowledge of a subject;
    • understanding how knowledge is organized in one's brain; and
    • the importance of thinking about one's own thinking, or metacognition.

    The work of Costa and Kallick builds on this framework by providing and elaborating on a set of dispositions or habits that characterize successful people (Costa & Kallick, 2000, 2008). These are the habits used by skillful thinkers who know how to behave when faced with complex problems and who are flexible learners.

    Robert Marzano has identified a set of strategies that are used by successful teachers (Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2001). We demonstrate in this book how many of these strategies can be used by teachers from pre-primary to tertiary levels as they develop learners with the ability to think effectively and become independent, lifelong learners.

    The more completely we understand the thinking processes involved in learning and problem solving, the more likely we are to be able to monitor and adjust our practices in ways that further successful behaviors. We are not advocating endless navel-gazing and introspection. When confronted with problems, we need to find solutions and act on them in a timely fashion. But shooting from the hip has gotten us into a great deal of trouble, personally, socially, and politically. As we face the increasingly complex problems in our schools, our homes, and in the workplaces of our nation, we need to understand what we are doing, we need to think before we act, and we need to be sure that our thinking is explicit and appropriate. It is imperative that we think about our thinking!

    We are grateful to many people: to Arthur Costa, who has been our constant source of encouragement and whose work with Bena Kallick was our inspiration at the start of our journey; to James Anderson and Elaine Brownlow, who supported our efforts in Australia; to Raj Chaudhury and Randy Caton in the United States for many useful discussions; to Richard Bartley, who was for Pat an important mentor; and to Deborah Stollenwerk and Alan Cook, who have guided us gently through the intricacies of editing.

    We dedicate this book to the many classroom teachers in both the United States and Australia who have embraced these ideas and enriched our understanding as they shared their experiences and their thoughts.

    Acknowledgments

    Corwin would like to thank the following individuals for taking the time to provide their editorial insight:

    Elizabeth Alvarez, Principal, John C. Dore Elementary School, Chicago, IL

    Lynn Macan, Superintendent, Cobleskill-Richmondville Central School District, Cobleskill, NY

    Tanna H. Nicely, Assistant Principal, Dogwood Elementary School, Knoxville, TN

    Susan Stewart, Assistant Professor, Ashland University, Ashland, OH

    Claudia J. Thompson, Academic Officer, Learning and Teaching Peninsula School District, Gig Harbor, WA

    About the Authors

    Martin Buoncristiani is an emeritus professor of physics at Christopher Newport University in the United States. He has been dedicated to science and mathematics education for over 35 years. In his involvement in curricular development for the university, he has been a strong advocate of adapting teaching methods to our current understanding of how people learn. His scientific research has focused on lasers and optical science, and he was awarded the NASA Public Service Medal for his work developing instruments for atmospheric study. Throughout his career he has addressed K-12 science education, beginning with promotion of computers in the classroom in the 1970s and extending to the introduction of critical thinking skills in the current decade.

    Patricia Buoncristiani has spent over 30 years as an educator committed to the belief that learning how to think is the foundation for every successful learner. She has been a classroom teacher, a teachers college lecturer, and, most recently, a school principal in both Australia and the United States. Her experience includes work with school systems in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia. She has had extensive experience training educators in early literacy development, behavior management, and the development of thinking-based curricula.

    Martin and Pat are cofounders of Thinking and Learning in Concert, an educational consultancy dedicated to integrating thinking and learning. Together they provide engaging, interactive, and dynamic workshops and presentations tailored to meet the specific needs of the group.

    They can be contacted at ausatlc@aol.com and http://thinkingandlearninginconcert.org/

  • 1. Metacognition Monitor

    2. Metacognitive Planning Template

    This is not intended to be a complete planning template. It is intended that it be infused into existing planning formats

    3. Whole-School Assemblies

    4. Reading as a Time for Thinking (Guidelines for Parents)

    5. Parents as Partners in Metacognition: Planning Points for Schools

    References

    Adams, J., & Pendlebury, J. (2010). Global research report: United States. Leeds, UK: Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/globalresearchreport-usa.pdf.
    Albert, R., & Barabási, A. L. (2001). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
    Anderson, J. (2010). Succeeding with habits of mind. Melbourne, Australia: Hawker Brownlow.
    Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R.A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
    Anzai, K., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.2.124
    Baggini, J., & Stangroom, J. (Eds.). (2004). Great thinkers A–Z. New York: Continuum.
    Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science and everyday life. New York: Plume (Penguin Group).
    Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.
    Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control (Vol. 1). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203014035
    Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
    Buoncristiani, A. M., & Buoncristiani, P. (2007). A network model of knowledge acquisition. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Thinking. Norrköping, Sweden. Retrieved from http://devisa-hb.se/thinkingconference/index13.html.
    Butterfield, E. C., & Ferretti, R. P. (1987). Toward a theoretical integration of cognitive hypotheses about intellectual differences among children. In J. G.Borkowski & J. D.Day (Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 195–233). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Chiabetta, E. L. A. (1976). A review of Piagetian studies relevant to science instruction at the secondary and college level. Science Education, 60, 253–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730600215
    Costa, A. (2001). Meditative environments in developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2000). Activating and engaging habits of mind. 4 vols. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Damasio, A. R. (1999). How the brain creates the mind. Scientific American, 281(6), 112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1299-112
    de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
    de Bono, E. (1968). New think: The use of lateral thinking (
    5th printing ed.
    ). New York: Basic Books.
    de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper & Row.
    de Bono, E. (1976). Teaching thinking. New York: Penguin Books.
    de Bono, E., (1994a). Teach your child how to think. New York: Penguin Books.
    de Bono, E. (1994b). Thinking course. New York: Barnes & Noble.
    Diderot, D. & D'Alembert, J. l. R. (Eds.). (1751/2011). Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc. [Encyclopedia of the sciences, arts, and crafts, etc.] University of Chicago: ARTFL Encyclopédie Project, R.Morrissey (Ed.), Retrieved from http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/.
    Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.
    Ferguson, E. S. (1977). The mind's eye: Nonverbal thought. Technology Science, 197(4306), 827–836.
    Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
    Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 324–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2870%2990019-8
    Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
    Gonzales, P., Gúzman, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., et al. (2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS) 2003. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005005.
    Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In M. A. K.Halliday, On language and linguistics, pp. 139–174. London: Continuum. (Originally published 1990 in Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, pp. 7–36).
    Hamming, R. (1986, March). You and your research. Presentation at Bell Communications Research Colloquium Seminar. Retrieved from http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html.
    Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H.Stevenson, H.Azuma & K.Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: Freeman.
    Hoffer, E. (2006). Reflections on the human condition. Titusville, NJ: Hopewell Publications.
    Jakab, P. L. (1990). Visions of a flying machine: The Wright Brothers and the process of invention. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
    Jensen, E. (2006). Enriching the brain: How to maximize every learner's potential. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons.
    Kahn, C. (2001). Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge, MA: Hackett.
    Kelly, F. C. (1943). The Wright brothers. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    Klein, J. (2008, March). On the intelligence of crows [video]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/joshua_klein_on_the_intelligence_of_crows.html.
    Marzano, R. J., Pickering. D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (
    11th ed.
    ). (2005). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
    Moats, L. C. (2001). Overcoming the language gap: Invest generously in teacher professional development. American Educator, 25(5), 8–9.
    National Academy of Sciences. (2006). Who will do the science of the future?: A symposium on careers of women in science. Washington, DC. National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10008.html.
    National Child Care Information and Technical Assistance Center. (2008). State requirements for child-staff ratios and maximum group sizes for child care centers. Retrieved from http://nccic.acf.hhs.gov/resource/state-requirements-child-staff-ratios-and-maximum-group-sizes-child-care-centers-2008.
    National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. M. S.Donovan, J. D.Bransford & J. W.Pelligrino (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9457.
    National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. J. D.Bransford, A. L.Brown, & R. R.Cocking (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309070368.
    National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Commmittee on How People Learn: A Targeted Report for Teachers. M. S.Donovan & J. D.Bransford (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10126.
    National Research Council. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html.
    Ogle, D. S. (1986). K-W-L group instructional strategy. In A. S.Palincsar, D. S.Ogle, B. F.Jones & E. G.Carr (Eds.), Teaching reading as thinking: Specific research-based strategies for teaching reading comprehension. (Teleconference Resource Guide, pp. 11–17). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Payne, R. (2003). A framework for understanding poverty. Highlands, TX: aha! Process.
    Phillips, H. (2009). The five ages of the brain. New Scientist, 2702, 26–31.
    Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Programme for International Student Assessment. (2003). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Organisation For Economic Co-operation And Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/55/0,2340,en_32252351_32236173_33917303_1_1_1_1,00.html.
    Ratey, J. J. (2001). A user's guide to the brain: Perception, attention and the four theaters of the brain. New York: Vintage Books.
    Rockwell, G. (1999, January). Diderot and hypertext. Unpublished essay presented to the McMaster Association for Eighteenth-Century Studies. Retrieved from http://www.geoffreyrockwell.com/publications/Diderot.Hypertext.pdf.
    Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110
    Russell, B. (1945). A history of western philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Schneider, W. (1985). Developmental trends in the metamemory–memory behavior relationship: An integrative review. In D. L.Forrest-Pressley, G. E.MacKinnon & T. G.Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance. (Vol. 1, pp. 57–109). New York: Academic Press.
    Sobulis, H. (2005). The philosophical foundations of the International Baccalaureate curriculum. IB Research Notes, 5(3), 2–7. Retrieved from http://www.ibo.org/programmes/research/publications/documents/notesoctober05.pdf.
    Swartz, R. J. (2001). Infusing critical and creative thinking into content instruction. In A. L.Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. (
    3rd ed.
    , pp. 266–274). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    ThomsonReuters. (n.d.). Global research report series: United States. Retrieved September 26, 2011, from http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/grr/.
    TraversJ. & MilgramS. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 425–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786545
    U. S. slide in world share continues as European Union, Asia Pacific advance. (2005). Science Watch, 15(5). Retrieved from http://www.sciencewatch.com/july-aug2005/index.html.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (AlexKozulin, trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934.).
    Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, E. D. (2005). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small world” networks. Nature, 393(4), 440–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/30918
    Weil, A., & Small, G. (2007). The healthy brain kit workbook. Boulder, CO: Sounds True.
    Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (Eds.). (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545
    Wells, G. (2009). The social context of language and literacy development. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Santa Cruz. Retrieved from http://people.ucsc.edu/~gwells/Files/Papers_Folder/documents/SocialContextofLandLDDraft.pdf.
    Wheeler, R., & Swords, R. (2006). Code-switching: Teaching Standard English in urban classrooms. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Whimbey, A. (1980). Students can learn to be better problem solvers. Educational Leadership, 37(7), 560–565.
    Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    CORWIN: A SAGE Company

    The Corwin logo–a raven striding across an open book–represents the union of courage and learning. Corwin is committed to improving education for all learners by publishing books and other professional development resources for those serving the field of PreK–12 education. By providing practical, hands-on materials, Corwin continues to carry out the promise of its motto: “Helping Educators Do Their Work Better.”


    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website