Culture & Cognition: Implications for Theory and Method
Publication Year: 2004
Culture plays an important role in our everyday lives, yet the study of cultural processes and their impact on thinking and behavior is still in its infancy. Research in anthropology generally lacks the clarity and specificity of cognitive processes and is therefore usually ignored by most psychologists. On the other hand, most cognitive research in psychology either ignores culture as an important factor to be taken into account or treats culture as yet another independent variable. Recent trends indicate an increasing interest in ‘cultureߣ as a topic of psychological inquiry. Culture and Cognition: Implications for Theory and Methods combines the study of culture with an understanding of relevant cognitive processes and the challenge of studying high-level cognition as embedded into culture. Author Norbert Ross engages ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Culture and Cognition: Ethnography of the Mind—A Cognitive Approach to Culture
- Chapter 2: Cultural Studies and Comparative Design
- The Logic of Cultural Studies
- Cross-Cultural Studies and Comparative Design
- Chapter 3: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Culture
- The Problem with Culture, Folk Beliefs, Scientific Concepts, and Their (Ab-)Use
- The Authenticity Crisis of Cultural Concepts: Cultural Differences and Different Cultures
- Culture as Socially Transmitted Models
- Toward a Cognitive Theory of Culture
- Ecological Knowledge among Menominee Native Americans and U.S. Majority Culture Fish Experts
- The Sharing of Culture and the Exploration of Cultural Differences
- Public and Private Culture: The Emergence of Shared Meaning
- Chapter 4: Research Methods: Data Gathering
- The Experimental Design
- Selection of Informants and Sample Size
- Presentation of Stimuli
- Scientific Methods and the Role of Participant Observation
- Research Design and Field Methods
- Experimental Methods in the Field: Data Collection
- Free Listing, Saliency, and the Definition of Domains
- Question Answer Frames, True/False Questions, and Sentence Frame Techniques
- Triad Comparison
- Pile Sorting: The Hierarchical Sorting of Elements
- Rating Tasks
- Eliciting Relationships between the Elements
- Induction and Reasoning Tasks
- Property Projection Task
- Category-Based Reasoning
- Cognition and Observational Studies
- Social Network Analysis and Informant Agreement
- The Network Perspective
- Social Network Concepts and Eliciting Methods
- Chapter 5: Patterns of Informant Agreement: Some Analytical Implications
- Informant Agreement/Disagreement
- The Basic Analysis
- Correlational Agreement Analysis
- The Weighted Similarity Measure
- Adjustment for Guessing
- Agreement Pattern and Residual Analysis
- Cultural Consensus and Informant Agreement
- Informant Competence and Residual Analysis
- Chapter 6: Combining Strengths: Toward a New Science of Culture
- Schemata, Cultural Models, and Consensus
- A New Ethnography and an Enhanced Cognitive Science
This book is dedicated to the memory of Thomas Schweizer, whom I appreciated not only as a colleague, but also as the warm human being he was.
Copyright © 2004 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Sage Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
Sage Publications Ltd.
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B-42, Panchsheel Enclave
Post Box 4109
New Delhi 110 017 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Culture and cognition : implications for theory and method / by Norbert Ross.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-7619-2906-1 — ISBN 0-7619-2907-X (paper)
1. Cognition and culture. I. Title.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
03 04 05 06 07 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquisitions Editor: Jim Brace-Thompson
Editorial Assistant: Karen Ehrmann
Production Editor: Julia Parnell
Copy Editor: Kristin Bergstad
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Indexer: Michael Ferreira
Cover Designer: Janet Foulger
This book will have many opponents. Experimental psychologists will accuse me of introducing flaws into essential aspects of experimental design and supporting an approach that lacks the necessary rigor to provide meaningful results. By the same token, many psychologists will question the need and virtue of studying nonstandard populations (non-undergraduate students).
Trained as an anthropologist, I tended to think that by defending their positions psychologists tried to maintain the status quo of their research, a highly time-efficient (and comfortable) research setting, where student subjects are forced to participate in studies, often run by their student colleagues.
By now I have come to think of an additional reason for this choice. Many cognitive psychologists still do not regard culture and social processes as of any interest for an understanding of processes in high-level cognition. While I have no sympathy with researchers who try only to maintain their research settings intact, I hope that this book will be read by more inquisitive minds in cognitive psychology and maybe even interest them in the topic.
Obviously, the approach proposed in this book also differs significantly from the more traditional anthropological approach of studying people from different cultures in their normal day-to-day context. While anthropologists will agree with my quest to abandon the study of undergraduate students, many will reject the idea of introducing formal experimental methods and statistical models into the field. Again, I hope their opposition does not prevent them from engaging with my arguments. I hope they will agree with me about the dire need to develop methodologies that allow us a better understanding, combined with more detailed theories about human culture, human thought, and human behavior.
In a sense, then, this book attempts to chart some middle ground between the two fields of inquiry, trying to unite the different perspectives of two academic disciplines that should never have been separated in the first place.—[Page viii]
This book is the fruit of many peoples' ideas and influences in the course of my academic development. The manuscript was written while I was a postdoctoral researcher and later an assistant research professor at Northwestern University. Here I learned many of the skills and problems of cognitive psychology and had plenty of time to discuss my ideas with colleagues, both graduate students and faculty. Most of the ideas presented in this book are, therefore, not to be seen as a reflection of my individual achievement. Instead they represent a mirror of my intellectual development within a very encouraging academic environment.
I tried to give credit to this fact by citing as much as possible of the work that was developed within a team effort to understand folk biology and both the cultural aspects of cognition and the cognitive aspects of culture. Still, it is hard to account for the many nights of discussion and hours of advice that I shared in the Petén (Guatemala) or central Wisconsin with Douglas Medin and Scott Atran. Especially, Douglas Medin helped the shaping of many of my thoughts, although I know that he will not agree with everything said in this book. I also want to thank Professor Ulrich Köhler for steering me toward this topic. I know he probably expected a very different book, but once more he took on the task of guiding me on my detours, making sure that I didn't lose track on the way.
Finally, I want to thank my family. As on previous occasions, they allowed me the extravagance of writing a book, using time that should have been theirs.[Page x]
References[Page 177][Page 190]1991). Writing against culture. In G.Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.(1999). Comments to Brumann. Current Anthropology, 40, 13–15.(1999). Attributional style, depression, and loneliness: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Chinese students. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 482–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004007(1970). The growth of word meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: Norton.(1993). Universelle Erhebungsmethoden und lokale Kognition am Beispiel urbaner Umweltethnologie in Süd-Sulawesi/Indonesien. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 118, 251–287.(1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.(1999). Sameness and the ethnological will to meaning [with commentaries]. Current Anthropology, 40, 29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ca.1999.40.issue-s1(1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.(1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral Brain Science, 21(4), 547–609.(1999). Itzaj Maya folkbiological taxonomy. In D.Medin & S.Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 119–203). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2001). Folkbiology doesn't come from folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in cross-cultural perspective. Culture and Cognition, 1, 3–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853701300063561, , , , & (1999). Folkecology and commons management in the Maya Lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 7598–7603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7598, , , , , , & (2002). Folkecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons: A garden experiment in the Maya Lowlands, 1995–2000. Current Anthropology, 43, 421–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ca.2002.43.issue-3, , , , , , , , & ([Page 178]1999). Against idealism/contra consensus. Current Anthropology, 40, 93–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/200062(2002). A bird's eye view: Triangulating biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures and expertise levels. Cognition, 84, 1–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277%2802%2900011-2, , , , & (1989). Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity. In S.Vosniadou & A.Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 76–121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.006(1953). Innovation: The basis of cultural change. New York: McGraw-Hill.(1996). Anthropology: A student's guide to theory and method. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.(1932). Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1937). Psychological methods and anthropological problems. Africa, 10, 401–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1155145(1998). The life of cognitive science. In W.Bechtel & G.Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 2–104). Malden, MA: Blackwell., , & (1992). Ethnobiological classification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(1968). Covert categories and folk taxonomies. American Anthropologist, 70, 290–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.2.02a00050, , & (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 74, 214–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140, , & (1974). Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. New York: Academic Press., , & (1969). Basic color terms. Berkeley: University of California Press., & (1964). Some semantic implications of Tzeltal numeral classifiers. American Anthropologist, 66, 79–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00840, & (1995). Research methods in anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press/Sage.(Berry, J., Poortinga, Y., & Pandey, J. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Berry, J., Poortinga, Y., Segall, M., & Dasen, P. (Eds.). (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.2001). Zafimaniry: An understanding of what is passed from parents to children: A cross-cultural investigation. Culture and Cognition, 1, 43–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853701300063570, , & (1994). Rethinking the cultural. In R.Borofsky (Ed.), Assessing cultural anthropology (pp. 243–249). New York: McGraw-Hill.(1986a). Exchange varieties and information between Aguaruna manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 428–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1986.88.issue-2(1986b). Requiem for the omniscient informant: There's life in the old girl yet. In J.Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology (S.177–S.197). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.([Page 179]1987a). Agreement between biological classification systems is not dependent on cultural transmission. American Anthropologist, 89, 914–920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1987.89.4.02a00100(1987b). Introduction. In Intracultural Variation [Special issue]. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(2), 150–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000276487031002002(1991). The information economy model applied to biological similarity judgment. In L. B.Resnick, J. M.Levine, & S. D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.(1989). Form or function: A comparison of expert and novice judgments of similarity among fish. American Anthropologist, 91, 866–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1989.91.4.02a00040, & (1990). Cognitive and contextual variation in hot-cold classifications. American Anthropologist, 92, 171–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.issue-1, & (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1991). Language & symbolic power (J. B.Thompson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1995). Forget culture: Replacement, transcendence, relexification. Cultural Anthropology, 10, 509–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.1995.10.4.02a00030(1999). Writing for culture: Why a successful concept should not be discarded. Current Anthropology, 40, 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/200058(1996). Introduction. In B.Shore (Ed.), Culture in mind. New York: Oxford University Press.(1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1979). Sex differences in Maasai cognition of personality and social identity. American Anthropologist, 81, 841–873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00050, & (1976). Balanced designs for triad tests: Two examples from English. Social Science Research, 5, 247–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X%2876%2990002-8, & (1975). A multidimensional representation of role terms. American Ethnologist, 2, 397–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.1975.2.3.02a00020, & (1972). The innovator's situation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1992). The decline of community in Zinacantán. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In D.Sperber, D.Premack, & A. J.Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. New York: Oxford University Press.(1999). Sources of conceptual change. In E.Scholnick, K.Nelson, S.Gelman, & P.Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1983). Schemata in cognitive anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 12, 429–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.12.100183.002241(1999). Comment on Brumann. Current Anthropology, 40, 15–16.(1959). Review of Skinner's Verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/411334([Page 180]2000). The cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 890–905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.110, & (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1957). Experimental design. New York: John Wiley., & (1995). Culture and cognitive development: From cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture and Psychology, 1, 25–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9511003(1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.(1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20, 253–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2785979, , & (2000). On the importance of comparative research: The case of folkbiology [Special issue]. Child Development, 71(1), 82–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.2000.71.issue-1(1999). Inductive reasoning in folkbiological thought. In D.Medin & S.Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., , , , & (What's its name: Patterns of plant identification among two Q'eqchi' Maya groups in Guatemala. Unpublished manuscript., & (n.d.).1954). The relation of Haunóo culture to the plant world. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.(1989). Cultural sharing and diversity. In R.Bolton (Ed.), The content of culture: Constants and variants (pp. 349–362). New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.(1990). Culture and human cognition. In J.Stigler, R.Shweder, & G.Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 65–129). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1992). Cognitive anthropology. In G.Schwartz, M.White, & C.Lutz (Eds.), New directions in psychological anthropology (pp. 47–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1999). Comment to Brumann. Current Anthropology, 40, 16–17.(1999). The sad story of anthropology, 1950–1999. In E. L.Cerroni-Long (Ed.), Anthropological theory in North America. Westport, CT: Berin & Garvey.(1993). New Guineans and their natural world. In S.Kellert & E. O.Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 251–271). Washington, DC: Island Press.(1999). Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengban people, Indonesian New Guinea. In D.Medin & S.Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., & (1970). Statistical studies of continuous geographical distributions. In R.Naroll & R.Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 620–639). New York: Columbia University Press.([Page 181]1932). Quantitative expression of cultural relationships. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 31, 211–256., & (1991). Der Aufstand der Tzeltal (1712–1713), Analyse einer evitalisations Bewegung im kolonialen Mesoamerika. Münster: Lit Verlag.(1998). Finalidades y cambios en el desarollo procesal de la sublevación de los Tzeltales (1712–1713) en los Altos de Chiapas, México. Memorias del Tercer Congresso Internacional de Mayistas (Julio, 1995), Chetumal (pp. 773–787). Mexico: UNAM.(1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.(2000). To whom it may concern. Anthropology Newsletter, 41(4), 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anne.2000.41.issue-4(1970). On the specificity of folk illness. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 26, 305–314.(1975). Hindsight foresight. The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1518.104.22.1688(2000). What anthropology can do for psychology: Facing physics envy, ethnocentrism, and a belief in race. American Anthropologist, 102, 552–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.issue-3(1962). The ethnographic study of cognitive systems. Washington, DC: Society of Washington.(1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1981). Guatemalan and U.S. concepts of success and failure. Human Organization, 40(2), 140–145., , , , & (1994). Cultural identity and global process. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222195(1986). Intracultural variation in folkmedical knowledge. A comparison between curers and non-curers. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 351–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1986.88.issue-2(2000). Remembering what one knows and the construction of the past: A comparison of cultural consensus theory and cultural schema theory. Ethnos, 28(3), 275–319.(1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.(1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology, 41(4), 515–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ca.2001.42.issue-4(1999). Commentary to Brumann, C. Current Anthropology, 40, 17–18.(1956). Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language, 32, 195–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/410665(1964). Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In D.Hymes (Ed.), Language in culture and society (pp. 36–39). New York: Harper and Row.(1981). Culture, language, and society. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.([Page 182]1997). Culture as process: Empirical methods for cultural psychology. In J.Berry, Y.Poortinga, & J.Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 301–346). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.(2000). What psychology can do for anthropology, or why anthropology took postmodernism on the chin. American Anthropologist, 102(3), 564–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.3.564(1978). Understanding sibling concepts: A developmental study of kin terms in Zinacantán. In P.Dasen (Ed.), Piagetian psychology (pp. 335–358). New York: Gardner Press., & (Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.1962). Social rank and evolutionary position in a coastal Peruvian village. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 18, 199–215.(1992). Cultural complexities: Studies in the social organization of meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.(1999). Commentary to Brumann, C. Current Anthropology, 40, pp. 18–19.(1975). Culture, people, nature: An introduction to general anthropology ((2nd ed.). New York: Crowell.1979). Exploratory data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage., & (1994). Young children's naïve theory of biology. Cognition, 50, 171–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2894%2990027-2, & (1969). A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 176–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2869%2980058-7(1988). Wörterbuch der Völkerkunde. Berlin: Reimer Verlag.(1995). Do children have a theory of race?Cognition, 54, 209–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2895%2991425-R(1996). Race in the making. Cambridge: MIT Press.(Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.2000). Constructivist models of the mind, contemporary psychoanalysis and the development of culture theory. American Anthropologist, 102(3), 538–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.issue-3(1992). The woman who climbed up the house: Some limitations of schema theory. In T.Schwartz, G.White, & C.Lutz (Eds.), New directions in psychological anthropology (pp. 68–79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709, , , & (1985). The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. In J.Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology (pp. 117–140). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(1993). The clash of civilizations?Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20045621(1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.(1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.([Page 183]1990). The effects of raising animals on children's biological knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 119–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00827.x(1993). The art of translation in a continuous world. In G.Pálsson (Ed.), Beyond boundaries: Understanding, translation, and the anthropological discourse (pp. 210–230). Oxford, UK: Berg.(1992). Materielle oder materialisierte Kultur?Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 117, 1–15.(1992). Developmental changes within the structure of the mammal domain. Developmental Psychology, 28, 74–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.124, , & (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1981). Cultural anthropology: A contemporary perspective ((2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.1996). Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1992). Schemes for schemata. In T.Schwartz, G.White, & C.Lutz (Eds.), New directions in psychological anthropology (pp. 59–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1955). The psychology of personal constructs (2 Vols.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1987). Variation in folkmodels and consequent behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(2), 2013–2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000276487031002006(1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., , & (1977). Meaning and context: A study in contextual shifts in meaning of Maasai personality descriptors. American Ethnologist, 4, 734–761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.1977.4.4.02a00090, & (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1995, , , & (1949a). Mirror of man: The relation of anthropology to modern life. New York: Whittlesey House.(1949b). The philosophy of the Navajo Indians. In F.Northrop (Ed.), Ideological differences and world order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(1993). Anthropologie und Ethnomethodologie: Eine theoretische und methodische Herausforderung. In J.Stagl (Hg.), Grundfragen der Ethnologie (pp. 167–182). Berlin: Reimer Verlag.(1977). Chonbilal Ch'ulelal. Grundformen mesoamerika-nischer Kosmologie und Religion in einem Gebets-text auf Maya Tzotzil. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag.(1989). Schamanismus in Mesoamerika? In B.Illius & M.Laubscher (Eds.), Circumpacifica, Festschrift für Thomas Bartels (pp. 257–275). Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.([Page 184]1982). Current trends in cognitive anthropology. Anthropos, 77, 329–350., , & (1994). Culture, identity and the project of a cosmopolitan anthropology. Man, 29, 537–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2804342(1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1998). Kultur und Evolutionstheorie. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 123, 5–20.(2003). Secondary-biodiversity: Local perceptions of forest habitats, the Maya of Solferino, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology., & (1995). Requiem or recognition: Not omniscient and not plain informants. Culture & Psychology, 1, 215–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9512004(1984). Properties of culture: An ethnographic view. R.Shweder & R.Le Vine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotions (pp. 67–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1980). Applied regression: An introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1951). Life in a Mexican village: Tepoztlán restudied. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(1994). Has culture theory lost its mind?Ethos, 22, 284–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/eth.1994.22.issue-3(1936). The study of man: An introduction. New York: D. Appleton-Century.(1997). The tree of life. Universals of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 251–295., , , , & (1956). A semantic analysis of the Pawnee kinship usage. Language, 32, 159–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/410664(1998). Statistics for anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1999). Essentialism, power and representation of caste: A developmental study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering. Vol. 60(2-B), Aug. 1999, 0856. Cary, NC: University Microfilms International.(1968). Notes on a theory and non-theory in anthropology. In R.Manners & D.Kaplan (Eds.), Theory in anthropology: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine., & (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224, & (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922–934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.522, & (1996). Anthropological theory: An introductory history. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield., & (1999). Introduction. In D.Medin & S.Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., & ([Page 185]1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome?Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0645, , , & (2000). Are there kinds of concepts?Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 121–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.121, , & (1996). Cognitive psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College., & (2002). Categorization and reasoning in relation to culture and expertise. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 1–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421%2802%2980003-2, , , , & (2003). The role of culture in the folkbiology of freshwater fish. Manuscript submitted for publication., , , , & (2001, April). Measuring intra- and inter-cultural variation among free lists: An example from English and Spanish emotion terms. Paper presented at the Culture and Explanation Workshop, Northwestern University., , & (1871). Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family (Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Vol. 17, No. 218). Washington, D.C.(1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289, & (1989). Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 572–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-73184.108.40.2062, & (1984). A method of testing alternative theories: An example from English kinship. American Anthropologist, 86, 668–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.issue-3, & (1962). Data quality control, a new research technique: Prolegomena to a cross-cultural study of culture stress. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.(1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.(1996). Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1990). Category based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 85–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.185, , , , & (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.(1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92, 289–316.(1989). The meaning of illness among the Koma of Northern Nigeria. In A.Jacobson-Widding & D.Westerlund (Eds.), Culture, experience and pluralism. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.(1987). Culture and cognition. In D.Holland & N.Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1940). On social structure. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 70, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2844197([Page 186]1952). Structure and function in primitive society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.(1930). Tepoztlan, a Mexican village: A study of folk life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1979). Network analysis of the diffusion of innovations. In P.Holland & S.Leinhardt (Eds.), Perspectives on social network research (pp. 137–164). New York: Academic Press.(1994). Cultural knowledge and cognitive structure. In M.Suárez-Orozco, G.Spindler, & L.Spindler (Eds.), The making of psychological anthropology (Vol. 2, pp. 254–283). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.(1999). Cultural consensus as a statistical model. Current Anthropology, 40, 103–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/200063(1996). Culture as shared cognitive representations. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [USA], 93, 4699–4705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.10.4699, , , , & (1964). Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. American Anthropologist, 68, 146–170., & (1997). Cultural universals: Measuring the semantic structure of emotion terms in English and Japanese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 5489–5494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.10.5489, , & (1989). Systemic culture patterns and high concordance codes. In R.Bolton (Ed.), The content of culture: Constants and variants (pp. 363–381). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press., & (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00020, , & (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.(1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192–233.(1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2876%2990013-X, , , (1989). Anthropologies and histories: Essays in culture, history and political economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.(1994). Die Entwicklung der Blumenindustrie in Zinacantán. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 119, 59–73.(1997). Nutz Lok'el li Kaxlane. Die Vertreibung der Ladinos aus San Andrés Larraínzar, Chiapas, Mexico. Von Geschichten, einem Ereignis und Geschichte. Münster: LIT Verlag.(2001). Bilder vom Regenwald: Mentale Modelle, Kulturwandel und Umweltverhalten bei den Lakandonen von Mexiko. Münster: LIT Verlag.(2002a). Cognitive aspects of intergenerational change: Mental models, cultural change and environmental behavior among the Lacandon Maya of southern Mexico. Human Organization, 61, 125–138.(2002b). Lacandon Maya intergenerational change and the erosion of folkbiological knowledge. In J.Stepp, F.Wyndham, & R.Zarger (Eds.), Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology (pp. 585–592). Athens: University of Georgia Press.([Page 187]The flowering of man: Naming of plants among the Tzotzil Maya of Zinacantán, Mexico. In W.Ahn, B.Goldstone, B.Love, A.Markman, & P.Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the lab: Festschrift in honor of Douglas L. Medin. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.(in press).2000). The development of folkbiological thought: A cross-cultural approach (Unpublished manuscript). Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology (Athens, Georgia)., & (2003). On the tip of the tongue: Cultural models, expertise, and the organization of knowledge. Field Methods., & (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014%2802%2900142-9, , , & (Mexican migrants in Chicago. Unpublished manuscript., & (n.d.).1989). Rang und Ansehen bei den Makassar von Gowa (Süd-Sulawesi/Indonesien). Berlin: Reimer Verlag.(1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.(1989). Margaret Mead und Samoa: Zur Qualität und Interpretation ethnologischer Feldforschungsdaten. In B.Illius & M.Laubscher (Eds.), Circumpacifica, Festschrift für Thomas Bartels (pp. 441–457). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.(1996a). Muster sozialer Ordnung; Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Berlin: Reimer Verlag.(1996b). Reconsidering social networks: Reciprocal gift exchange among the !Kung. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 6, 7–21.(2000, September). Mead Freeman déja vu. Anthropology News, p. 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anne.2000.41.issue-6(1996). Culture in mind. New York: Oxford University Press.(1991). Thinking through cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 73–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2802222(1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.(1955). Sociocultural and psychological processes in menomini acculturation. (University of California Publications in Culture and Society, vol. 5.) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.(1971). Some eliciting and computational procedures for descriptive semantics. In P.Kay (Ed.), Explorations in mathematical anthropology (pp. 79–116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., , & (1992). Models and motives. In R.D'Andrade & C.Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.([Page 188]1992). Preliminaries to a theory of culture acquisition. In H.Pick, P.van den Broek, & D.Knill (Eds.), Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., & (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1964). Studies in ethnoscience. In Transcultural studies in cognition [Special issue]. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 99–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00850(1981). Remedios caseros: Mexican-American home remedies and community health problems. Social Science and Medicine, 15B, 107–114.(1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. London: J. Murray.(1989). Gender metaphors in maladies and medicine: The symbolism of protective charms among the Giriama of Kenya. In A.Jacobson-Widding & D.Westerlund (Eds.), Culture, experience and pluralism (pp. 45–57). Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.(1980). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J.Berry, Y.Poortinga, & J.Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 257–300). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., & (1993). María de la Candelaria, india natural de Cancuc. Mexico: UNAM.(1967). Tendencia de cambio en las tierras altas de Chiapas. América Indígena, 27(2), 199–222.(1981). The invention of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1995). The final requiem for the omniscient informant? An interdisciplinary approach to everyday cognition. Culture & Psychology, 1, 167–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9512002(Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. (Eds.). (1993). Alltagswissen: Der kognitive Ansatz im interdisziplinären Dialog. Fribourg: Mueller Verlag.1983). New data on intracultural variability: The hot/cold concept of medicine and illness. Human Organization, 42, 249–257.(1984a). Consistency and consensus among informants: Disease concepts in a rural Mexican town. American Anthropologist, 86, 966–975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.issue-4(1984b). Cross-cultural concepts of illness: Variation and validation. American Anthropologist, 86, 341–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.2.02a00090(1987). Shared knowledge, intracultural variation, and knowledge aggregation. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 178–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000276487031002004(1988). Systematic data collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1990). Metric scaling: Correspondence analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1987). The myth of a sub-culture of corporal punishment. Human Organization, 46, 39–47., , & (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 1070–1090., & ([Page 189]1999). Comment to Brumann. Current Anthropology, 40, 19–21.(1999). Evolution and devolution of folkbiological knowledge. Cognition, 73, 177–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277%2899%2900051-7, , & (2000). Social expectations among African American, Hispanic, and European American adolescents. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(2), 283–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400305, & (1982). Variation in the choice of treatment in two Mexican communities. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 1453–1465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536%2882%2990060-0, & (2001). Acculturation and ethnobotanical knowledge loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela. In L.Maffi (Ed.), On biocultural diversity (pp. 190–211). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Press.(
About the Author[Page 203]
Norbert O. Ross is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University. Previously, he was Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, where he co-founded the Program in Culture, Language and Cognition. His research deals with the broad issue of culture and cognition, targeting questions such as effects of cultural change, the acquisition of cultural knowledge, and effect of culture on human thinking and behavior. While most of his research is within the realm of folk biology, he also conducted research on issues of health and religion. He is principal investigator or co-principal investigator on several research grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Health.
Dr. Ross is fluent in two Maya languages and most of his research takes place among Maya people in Mexico and Guatemala. In addition, he also conducts research among Native Americans and Hispanic populations in the United States. He is the author of two books (published in Germany), several book chapters, and many journal articles. Originally from Germany, he earned a Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of Freiburg.