Crisis Communication and Crisis Management: An Ethical Approach
Publication Year: 2017
Crisis Communication and Crisis Management: An Ethical Approach is the only text on the market to provide students with the integration of ethical inquiry into the fundamentals of crisis communication.. Authors Burton St. John III and Yvette E. Pearson combine comprehensive coverage of the key skills, concepts, and theories of crisis communication with an extensive collection of contemporary case studies, giving students a strong understanding of the essential role that communicators play in moments of crisis. Students are encouraged to build upon their communication and ethical decision making skills using a variety of stakeholder inventories, hypothetical scenarios, discussion questions, and professional profiles. Students will also gain exposure to a mixture of discrete and ongoing crises, preparing them to manage both one-time crises and continuing crises.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Section 1: An Ethically Grounded Approachto Crisis Management
- Chapter 1: Fundamentals of Crisis Management and Ethics
- Chapter 2: Issues Management and Managing Crises
- Chapter 3: Integrating Ethical Theory and Crisis Management
- Section 2: Case Studies
- Chapter 4: Health Communication
- Chapter 5: Environmental Communication
- Chapter 6: Advocacy Communication
- Chapter 7: Strategic Communication
- Chapter 8: Government Communication
- Chapter 9: Science Communication
- Chapter 10: Technology Communication
- Section 3: The Future of Ethics and Crisis Management
- Chapter 11: The Way Forward
SAGE Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver’s Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
3 Church Street
#10-04 Samsung Hub
Copyright © 2017 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: St. John, Burton, author. | Pearson, Yvette E., author.
Title: Crisis communication and crisis management : an ethical approach / Burton St. John III, Old Dominion University, Yvette E. Pearson, Old Dominion University.
Description: Los Angeles : SAGE Publications, [2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016010156 | ISBN 9781483316147 (pbk. : alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: Communication in crisis management. | Crisis management.
Classification: LCC HD49.3 .S72 2017 | DDC 363.34/8068—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016010156
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
Acquisitions Editor: Terri Accomazzo
Editorial Assistant: Erik Helton
Production Editor: Olivia Weber-Stenis
Copy Editor: Tina Hardy
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Proofreader: Dennis Webb
Cover Designer: Alexa Turner
Marketing Manager: Ashlee Blunk
The need for ethical crisis management and crisis communications continues to be as pressing as ever. As this volume goes to print, we see continual examples of the rapid-fire emergence of crisis. Take, for example, crisis eruptions that occurred within one week in the winter of 2015. Hispanic groups protest against NBC for inviting Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump to host Saturday Night Live. 1 Exxon faces increasing calls for a federal investigation as reports emerge that archival documents show the company knew, in the 1970s, the risk that fossil fuels posed for climate change but instead chose to communicate doubt about such a concern.2 Airlines around the world encounter anxiety about security measures in the wake of fears that a bomb brought down a Russian airplane in the Sinai Peninsula.3
Clearly, when it comes to crises, there is no one typical example. From the aforementioned scenarios, we can see, however, one component that is in common: the need for a continual and concentrated focus on stakeholders affected by an organization’s decisions and actions. In particular, this volume shows that organizations faced with either warning signs of a crisis, or the actual emergence of a crisis, should incorporate an ethical awareness into how they attempt to manage such events. In doing so, this volume attempts to address what has been a common impediment to learning from crises: too much of an emphasis on key actors in a crisis management situation using certain processes and procedures to attempt to gain control and remedy the situation—what has been called a “modernist” view.4 In contrast, Bell observed, more optimistically, that broader understandings are arising gradually in the study of crisis management and crisis communications, as they comprise a field of “burgeoning research” that is explaining “its applied value.”5 Noticeably absent in her observation, however, is the value of philosophical inquiry, particularly ethical analysis, for the prevention and alleviation of crises.
This volume was inspired by an interest in integrating ethical inquiry more fully into all stages of crisis management, something we see as a distinctive contribution among books that seek to address both the nature of crises and how to best prepare for and manage crises. In part this is accomplished by helping readers develop an understanding of their [Page xii]status as moral agents; for all of us, in virtue of our ability to reason, have the capacity for moral agency. Regardless of one’s career choice or station in life, he or she is fundamentally a moral agent. Arguably, most moral decisions are fairly straightforward and even mundane. For example, it takes little, if any, reflection to conclude that one should refrain from deliberately driving into a crowd of pedestrians in the crosswalk just so he or she can get to a business meeting on time. When it comes to more complex moral issues—and crisis management and crisis communications are certainly fraught with complexity—greater reflection is required. This in-depth examination is necessary not only for accurate identification of the relevant ethical issues but also for engagement in fruitful analyses of the problems requiring resolution.
It should be understood that moral agents have the capacity to engage in moral examination even when there is variation in experience, skill, or willingness to do so. Also, as with most areas of human experience, there are ethical problems that may be more resistant to solutions than others. And there are times when one will reach the limits of his or her competence and must seek out others for consultation to identify, adequately analyze, and resolve a moral problem. People commonly acknowledge their limitations in other areas and reach out to others when, for example, seeking greater understanding or a solution to a problem in the context of law or medicine. Just as prudence dictates consultation with a lawyer or physician when there are legal or medical questions requiring knowledge or experience beyond one’s own, consultation with other moral agents, particularly those who have more experience grappling with ethical issues, is often useful in shedding light on the morally relevant elements of certain situations, including crises. This is not to suggest that only those who specialize in the academic discipline of ethics can address ethical problems; instead, immersion in ethical inquiry characteristic of those with academic training in philosophy brings to the table an important and useful skill set. Though specialists in ethics are subject to the same human frailties as anyone else, people with extensive academic training in ethical inquiry will likely identify ethical issues more readily and have more tools immediately available to deploy when faced with an ethical issue or set of issues. This is chiefly because they have studied multiple ethical theories in detail, engaged in logical analysis of arguments defending various positions on ethical issues, and examined numerous real-life and hypothetical scenarios.
Much to the chagrin of people who study ethics in depth and take seriously the view that ethical inquiry is important, ethics is often distorted or ignored by individuals or organizations seeking to achieve goals deemed more important, such as preserving or bolstering one’s reputation, making money, or gaining power. Often, such self-interested motivations lead people to act in ways that are neither morally defensible nor remotely virtuous. Correspondingly, compliance with laws or organizational rules, routines, policies, and procedures is conflated with acting ethically. This is problematic, however, as it is erroneous to assume that all laws, policies, or work procedures have been informed by ethical considerations or subject to ethical analysis to determine whether they are consistent with moral rules. [Page xiii]For example, laws are not necessarily morally sound, and it is neither practical nor desirable to legislate morality. There have been numerous U.S. laws that clearly fly in the face of basic moral requirements to treat people as autonomous beings, capable of making their own decisions regarding their lives, such as laws permitting slavery or requiring forcible sterilization of people. Additionally, it would not follow that committing actions currently prohibited by law, such as murder, would suddenly become morally permissible if laws prohibiting murder were repealed tomorrow. Furthermore, work routines, policies, or procedures may have been formulated without moral reflection and, instead, focus primarily on maximizing efficiency, pleasing the interests of dominant interests within and without the organization, or avoiding legal repercussions. In sum, as a crisis arises, deference to laws or the organizational rules provide an inadequate basis for the ethical examination needed to successfully address the crisis.
An additional concern is consideration of ethical issues, if it emerges at all, often occurs only after something disastrous has occurred. Frequently, there’s a belated recognition that moral rules were violated and said violations likely contributed to the problem. There may be a temporary public discussion of what happened along with some expressions of indignation, allegations that a person or organization acted “unethically,” that such behavior is intolerable, and that the organization or stakeholders impacted by the organization will make sure such actions do not recur. An organization may also be punished legally if the ethically problematic behavior also involved violations of a specific law. This is an all-too-common story line of how crisis is addressed in these times. What we see less frequently is a meaningful integration of ethics into the culture of an organization or profession as it faces a crisis. People may give lip service by crafting a “code of ethics” that may rarely see the light of day or be read by anyone other than the person(s) who authored it. Even more problematically, countermessages might be communicated, suggesting that any “ethics training” or creation of a code of ethics was merely a matter of checking the ethics box before getting down to more important matters.
As an antidote, this volume offers recent case studies that are designed to lead readers through the process of seeing that, as moral agents, all people have certain basic ethical obligations when encountering crises. We group crises cases by arenas of common practice in public relations (e.g., strategic communication, health communication, advocacy communication) that may also be useful as broader areas of study for a wide array of students in such areas as business and public administration, marketing, and allied health care professions. In doing so, this volume lays out cases that call on readers to examine the role of moral reasoning in crisis management. We emphasize this approach because, all too often, the modern, hyper-communicated environment that surrounds crises pushes organizations to respond before ethical issues have been fully identified or examined carefully. A more deliberative approach toward crises that inculcates awareness of ethical concerns can allow readers to develop a more anticipatory approach that respects the needs of multiple stakeholders and increases the odds of successfully resolving a crisis. Accordingly, [Page xiv]across this volume, we offer several features to help spur such deliberation beyond standard discussion questions after each case study. Boxed items titled “Consider This” offer questions about significant elements of a crisis that need more reflection and then an articulation of ethics in action. “Decision Points” offer a hypothetical next-stage crisis, with questions provided to help guide the reader to think critically about ethical choices. “Stakeholder Inventory” boxed items provide key information about stakeholders affected by a crisis, along with questions about how to address those stakeholders’ interests in an ethically sound manner. Finally, in some case studies, a “Professional Voice” section provides additional valuable lessons from communications scholars about the role of ethics in managing a crisis. These features of the case studies reinforce that mindfulness concerning ethical facets of a crisis is integral to crisis prevention and ethically informed crisis management, which will better ensure protection of the morally legitimate interests of clients, their stakeholders, and society at large.January 2016Notes
1. Zorthian, J. (2015). Protestors march against Donald Trump hosting “Saturday Night Live.” Time, November 8. Available at: http://time.com/4103975/donald-trump-saturday-night-live-protesters/
2. Cama, T. (2015, November 9). Pressure builds to probe Exxon climate claims. The Hill. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/259436-pressure-builds-to-probe-exxon-climate-claims
3. Townsend, M. (2015, November 8). Russian plane crash: Calls for new era of airport security after Sinai terror. The Guardian (UK). Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/07/new-era-airport-security-sinai-terror
4. Mehta, A., & Xavier, R. (2012). Tracking the defining moments of crisis process and practice. Public Relations Review, 38, 376–382; Ihlen, O. (2010). Love in tough times: Crisis communication and public relations. The Review of Communication, 10(2), 98–111.
5. Bell, L. M. (2010). Crisis communication: The praxis of response. The Review of Communication, 10(2), 142–155; see p. 142.
This work has been long in the making and, as such, calls for acknowledgments to several who have, through their support and past encouragement, helped make it possible. Burton St. John thanks his family (Dana, Melissa, and Aaron) for their patient support. Stephen Pullen, chair of Old Dominion University’s Communications and Theatre Arts Department, has been a consistent source of support. Colleagues Carol Considine, Michelle Covi, Kirsten Johnson, and Wie Yusuf have been consistently helpful on insights concerning risk and crisis management. He also extends his thanks to individuals who have, across his career, provided insights during crisis management and crisis communications situations, especially Dianne Williams, Jim Mruk, Joseph Breckenridge, Larry Dingman, Diane Todd, and Paul Harrington. Yvette Pearson is grateful for constant encouragement, support, and vital humorous interludes provided by her husband, Peter. Several friends and colleagues have also been invaluable in providing moral, intellectual, and logistical support, especially Robyn Bluhm, Jason Borenstein, Jennifer Fish, Marcia Kennedy, Yuping Liu-Thompkins, and Dale E. Miller. Thanks are also due to students from past course offerings who provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts of case studies included in this text.
The authors also thank Matt Byrnie, Theresa Accomazzo, Janae Masnovi, and Gabrielle Piccininni of SAGE and are thankful for the keen eye of editing and writing professional Tina Hardy. We are particularly grateful for Matt’s consistent encouragement of this project from its inception. Finally, we extend our thanks to the reviewers listed below for their reviews of our original proposal, which were helpful in bringing this volume to fruition.
SAGE Publishing acknowledges the contributions of the following reviewers:
Julie Davis, College of Charleston
Barbara S. Gainey, Kennesaw State University
Nick Linardopoulos, Rutgers University
Lori Melton McKinnon, Oklahoma State University
Sally J. Ray, Western Kentucky University
John D. Stone, James Madison University
About the Authors
Selected References[Page 200]1992 ). Ancient ethics and modern morality. Philosophical Perspectives, 6, 119–136.(2010 ). Crisis communication: The praxis of response. The Review of Communication, 10(2), 142–155.(1995 ). Accounts, excuses, and apologies. Albany: State University of New York Press.(1997 ). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23, 177–186.(2006 ). Ethical considerations in the conduct of electronic surveillance research. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(3), 611–619., , , , , & . (2011 ). A stakeholder approach to issues management. New York, NY: Business Expert Press.(2009 ). What communication professionals tell us regarding dominant coalition access and gaining membership. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 418–443.(2015 ). Auto recall crisis, framing, and ethical response: Toyota’s missteps. Public Relations Review, 41, 40–49., & (2013 ). Cutlip & Center’s effective public relations (, & (11thed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.2005 ). Science and medicine in Nazi Germany: Is moral inquiry into Nazi medical crimes immoral? Isaac Franck Distinguished Memorial Lectures on Ethics. Washington, DC: Program for Jewish Civilization.(1984 ). Issues management: Origins of the future. Stamford, CT: IAP.(2001 ). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In & (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 231–269). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE., & (2012 ). Ongoing crisis communications ((3rded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.2012 ). The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review, 38, 408–415., & (2010 ). Crisis management in the new strategy landscape. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE., , & (2008 ). Krafting the obesity message: A case study in framing and issues management. Public Relations Review, 34, 373–379., , & (1997 ). Issues management: Managing trends through the issues life cycle. In (Ed.), The handbook of strategic public relations and integrated communication (pp. 173–188). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.([Page 201] ( 2011 ). Crisis communication: A casebook approach (4thed.). New York, NY: Routledge.1986 ). Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable. New York, NY: AMACOM.(2008 ). Crisis management in a complex world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press., & (2010 ). Theory in feminist bioethics. In , , & (Eds.), Feminist bioethics: At the center on the margins (pp. 61–70). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press., & (2010 ). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.(1984 ). Managing public relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston., & (1992 ). Strategic management, publics, and issues. In (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 117–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (2006 ). Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1988 ). Issues management: Developing corporate survival strategies. In (Ed.), Strategic issues management: How organizations influence and respond to public interests and policies (pp. 1–44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.(1986 ). Issues management: Corporate public policymaking in an information society. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE., & (2001 ). The girl who cried pain: A bias against women in the treatment of pain. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29, 13–27., & (2010 ). Love in tough times: Crisis communication and public relations. Review of Communication, 10(2), 98–111.(1785 ). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals ( , Trans., 1990 ). New York, NY: Macmillan.(2006 ). An invitation to feminist ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.(1996 ). A resource-based-view of the socially responsible firm: Stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as strategic assets. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1355–1363.(1988 ). Issues management and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 191–198., & (2012 ). Tracking the defining moments of crisis process and practice. Public Relations Review, 38, 376–382., & (2011 ). The great conversation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.(1861 ). Utilitarianism ( , Ed., 1979 ). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.(1994 ). Crisis management and environmentalism: A natural fit. California Management Review, 36(2), 101–113.(1979 ). Research by the conference board sheds light on problems of semantics, issue identification and classification—and some likely issues for the ’80s. Public Relations Journal, 35, 43–46.(2012 ). PR professionals as organizational conscience. Journal of Mass Media Research, 27, 220–234., & (2006 ). Responsible advocacy through strategic risk communication. In & (Eds.), Ethics in public relations: Responsible advocacy (pp. 131–153). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE., & (2003 ). Placing animals in urban environmental ethics. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(1), 64–78.([Page 202] ( 1995 ). Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for health professionals. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(3), 253–277.2012 ). Theoretical approaches to and sociocultural perspectives in crisis communication. In & (Eds.), Case studies in crisis communication: International perspectives on hits and misses (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Routledge.(1977 ). Vegetarianism and “the other weight problem.” In & (Eds.), World hunger and moral obligation (pp. 180–193). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://www.hughlafollette.com/eip4/vegetarianism.pdf(1997 ). Can ethics provide answers? New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.(2003 ). The elements of moral philosophy ((4thed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.2001 ). Trust us, we’re experts! How industry manipulates science and gambles with your future. New York, NY: Penguin., & (2005 ). Risk issues and crisis management: A casebook of best practice (, & (3rded.). London, UK: Kogan Page.1993 ). Issues management in strategic planning. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.(2011 ). Scientific research and public trust. Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 399–409.(2009 ). Approaches to ethics for corporate crisis management. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 109–116.(1978 ). Advocacy advertising—The American experience. California Management Review, 11, 55–67.(2010 ). The fundamentals of ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.(2005 ). Property rights and genetic engineering: Developing nations at risk. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 137–138.(1990 ). Beyond contingency planning: Toward a model of crisis management. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 40(2), 263–275.(1997 ). Is it time to abandon brain death? Hastings Center Report, 27, 29–37.(1993 ). Managing issues acts as a bridge to strategic planning. Public Relations Journal, 49(11), 38–40., & (2011 ). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity (, , & (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.2010 ). Why fallacies appear to be better arguments than they are. Informal Logic, 30(2), 159–184.(1973 ). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 273–283., & (2010 ). Environmental scanning: An application of information literacy skills at the workplace. Journal of Information Science, 36(6), 719–732., , & (