Confronting the State: ULFA's Quest for Sovereignty
Publication Year: 2013
Confronting the State: ULFA's Quest for Sovereignty examines the complex nuances and dynamics that make ULFA (United Liberation Front of Assam) a formidable insurgent group in India. It argues that to understand the phenomenon of insurgency, one has to understand the genesis of conflict between the Indian State and the state of Assam right from the very inception of the nation-state.
The author claims that the ideological and identity issues between India and Assam have remained unresolved, and ULFA is a manifestation of that unresolved crisis. He explains that ULFA represents a mindset, a suppressed voice, which is deeply engrained in Assam's psyche. The declining support base of ULFA is not to be seen in its numerical strength; it represents the unmet aspirations of the tribal ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: From Nationalism to Secessionism: Transformation of Assamese Identity
- Chapter 2: Assam Movement: Laying the Foundation of an Armed Struggle
- Chapter 3: Periodising ULFA's Metamorphosis: From Liberator to War Lord(?)
- Chapter 4: Parag Das: The Ideologue
- Chapter 5: ‘ULFOcide’, State Terror and Truncated Democracy
- Chapter 6: What Keeps ULFA Going: Endogenous and Exogenous Factors
- Chapter 7: What Sustains ULFA?
- Chapter 8: ULFA in International Network: From Grievances to Greed
- Chapter 9: Peace Process with ULFA, Civil Society and the Indian State
- Chapter 10: Confronting the State: Exploring Ways for Sustainable Peace
- Chapter 11: Re-Visiting Immigration and Identity: Issues of Human Security, Development and Sustainable Peace
Copyright © Nani Gopal Mahanta, 2013
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
First published in 2013 by
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B1/I-1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044, India
SAGE Publications Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320, USA
SAGE Publications Ltd
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd
33 Pekin Street
#02-01 Far East Square
Published by Vivek Mehra for SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, Phototypeset in 10.5/13 Minion Pro by RECTO graphics, Delhi and printed at De-Unique, New Delhi.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available
ISBN: 978-81-321-0704-0 (HB)
The SAGE Team: Shambhu Sahu, Dhurjjati Sarma, Anju Saxena, and Dally Verghese
[Page v]To my parents and brother, Rantu Da
Thank you for choosing a SAGE product! If you have any comment, observation or feedback, I would like to personally hear from you. Please write to me email@example.com—Vivek Mehra, Managing Director and CEO, SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi
SAGE India offers special discounts for purchase of books in bulk.
We also make available special imprints and excerpts from our books on demand.
For orders and enquiries, write to us at
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B1/I-1, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, Post Bag 7
New Delhi 110044, India
E-mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Get to know more about SAGE, be invited to SAGE events, get on our mailing list. Write today email@example.com
This book is also available as an e-book.
List of Tables[Page ix]
- 1.1 Representation of Assam in Cabinet Mission 17
- 1.2 Production Capacities of Refineries in India, 1983–84 28
- 2.1 Violent Incidents during Assam Movement 48
- 3.1 Incentives for Surrender of Arms 96
- 6.1 Should Insurgency Be Suppressed or Resolved through Negotiation? 174
- 6.2 While Others Identify Themselves Only with Their State Identity, How Do You Identify Yourself? 174
- 6.3 Militants Captured and Handed Over to Police by Public 190
- 7.1 Representation of Morans in Various Private Companies 207
- 7.2 Human Development Indicators, Assam and Its Districts, 2001 215
- 7.3 Human Development Indicators, Assam and Its Districts, 2001, by Rank 217
- 8.1 Population Variation in India and Assam (in per cent) 231
- 8.2 Proportion of Muslim Population in India and Assam (in per cent) 232
- 9.1 Whether to Negotiate with Insurgents or to Suppress Them 289
- 9.2 Solving Insurgency Problem by the government Alone or by Involving the greater Society 289
- 9.3 Causes behind Insurgency in North East India 290
- 10.1 How Does One Identify in Assam? 304 [Page x]
- 11.1 Nature of Displacement from Big Dams in North East India 327
- 11.2 Non-military Insecurity Indicators 331
- 11.3 Causing Insurgency in North East India: Peoples’ Perceptions 332
- 11.4 How Do Road Blockades and Call for Bandh Affect People's Life? 333
List of Abbreviations[Page xi]
AALO All Assam Liberation Organisation AAMSU All Assam Minority Students' Union AASU All Assam Students' Union ABSU All Bodo Students' Association ABUSS Asomiya Bhasa Unnati Sadhini Sabha ADS Asian Dialogue Society AFSPA Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act AGP Asom gana Parishad AIM Assam Institute of Management AJUP Asom Jatiya Unnayan Parishad AJYCP Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuva Chatra Parishad AL Awami League ALA Assam Liberation Army APCC Assam Provincial Congress Committee APLA Assam People's Liberation Army ATTSA Assam Tea Tribes Students' Association AVARD-NE Association of Voluntary Agencies for Rural Development for North East AXX Axam Xahitya Xabha BLTF Bodo Liberation Tiger Force BNLA Brachin National Liberation Army BNP Bangladesh Nationalist Party BNU Brachin National Union BSF Border Security Force CCHQ Central Command Headquarters CHQ Central Headquarters CNF Chin National Front CPI Communist Party of India [Page xii] CPI (ML) Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) CR Conflict Resolution CSDS Centre for the Study of Developing Societies DGFI Directorate general of Forces Intelligence DHD Dimasa Halong Daugah DRDA District Rural Development Agency GHQ General Headquarters GOC General Officer Commanding GOI Government of India HDI Human Development Index HSLC High School Leaving Certificate IAS Indian Administrative Services IB Intelligence Bureau ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights IIE Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship IIFT Indian Institute of Foreign Trade IMDT Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunal) Act IOJ Islamic Oikya Jote IOC Indian Oil Corporation IPS Indian Police Services ISI Inter-Services Intelligence JCI Jute Corporation of India JKLF Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front JMB Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh JMMB Jagrata Matri Mukti Bahini KIA Kachin Independence Army KIO Kachin Independence Organisation KLO Kamatapur Liberation Organisation KMSS Krishak Mukti Sangram Samity LMG Light Machine gun LOC Letter of Credit MASS Manab Adhikar Sangram Samiti MHQ Mobile Headquarters NDFB National Democratic Front of Bodoland NEEPCO North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited [Page xiii] NERDA North East Regional Defence Army NESO North East Students' Organisation NHPC National Hydroelectric Power Corporation NNC Naga National Council NRCP National River Conservation Plan NSA National Security Act NSCN (IM) Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (Isak-Muivah) NSCN National Socialist Council of Nagaland NSF Naga Students' Federation NSI National Security Intelligence OC officer-in-charge OIL Oil India Limited OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries PCG People's Consultative group PCPIA People's Committee for Peace Initiative in Assam PLA People's Liberation Army PLP Purbanchal Lok Parishad PREPAK People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak PWG People's War group RAW Research and Analysis Wing RBA Royal Bhutan Army SAARC South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation SP Superintendent of Police SULA Seven Unit Liberation Army SULFA Surrendered United Liberation Front of Asom TADA Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act TMPK Takam Mising Porin Kebang UCS Unified Command Structure ULASS United Liberation Army of Seven States ULF United Liberation Front ULFA United Liberation Front of Asom UMF United Minorities Front UNLF United National Liberation Front UNPO Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization UPDS United People's Democratic Solidarity UPSC Union Public Service Commission URMCA United Reservationist Minority Council of Assam/United Revolutionary Minority Council of Assam
The nation- and state-building project of India faces daunting challenges in North East India. What stifles is the simplistic, linear, development-centric approach of scholars and security experts from ‘mainstream’ India. Such a narrative neglects a host of other factors that sustain insurgency and violence in the region. It will be a gross mistake to analyse the phenomenon as only emanating from ‘greed’ factors and easy accessibility of arms in the region. These factors certainly play a decisive role—however, the centrality of analysis based on these factors does not answer many questions. As Sanjib Baruah said, poverty, underdevelopment and lack of economic opportunities are everyone's favourite bogey as causes of armed conflict.1 However, nature of state building, or the myopic vision of conflict resolution, receives scant attention from the policy maker of New Delhi. The people of the region are yet to own the Indian State. The problem lies with the legitimacy of the Indian State. North East India still remains the best experimenting ground, for what our security experts term as ‘Carrot and Stick Policy’.
A majority of the armed rebellions in the North East region are led by people of Mongoloid origin. In other words, the indigenous North Eastern people of Mongoloid origin whose roots spread out in the South-East Asian region are yet to feel comfortable with the idioms of the Indian nation-state.
Armed rebellion in the North Eastern region is a medium—a language, a voice—to express their grievances. While the State may have the bounden duty to confront a violent movement, it has to understand the mindset, the psyche that keeps such violence going for ages. Undeniably, [Page xvi]the Indian State has won the war against United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA).
ULFA represents a mindset, a suppressed voice which is deeply engrained in Assam's psyche. ULFA is the last source of Assam's protest against New Delhi, especially after the decline of All Assam Students' Union (AASU) and regional forces like Asom gana Parishad (AgP). The declining support base of ULFA is not to be seen in its numerical strength. It represents the unmet aspirations of the innumerable tribal and ethnic groups of Assam. It is true that the organisation is losing its base in the urban areas because of its indiscriminate bomb blasts and killings. Such deviations did take place—but what about the original issues that the organisation had raised, like the issues of resource control and of land. The ethnic groups of Assam face twin challenges—one from the unchecked illegal immigration across the border and the other from the internal migration from mainland India—which have posed serious questions to the representation and identity of the smaller communities. Their greatest fear is that they have become alien in their own historical homeland and the groups have no mechanism to give vent to their grievances. They face a State which is insensitive, corrupt and partisan—that which listens to the logic of electoral dynamics. These ethnic groups, on the other hand, do not have the numerical strength through which they can influence the state politics.
The nature and issues of Assam's politics have remained the same from the days of the colonial period. The stalwarts of Assam have raised these issues right from the 1940s. They demanded a genuine federal structure that can protect the identities of smaller groups, through which they have a hold on their resources and can frame their own citizenship laws.
ULFA raises certain larger issues like representation, governance, citizenship, state making and nation building and the voice of smaller ethnic groups whose immediate priority is not market and profit but issues of memory, community land and a sense of belonging to the traditional system.
We are arguing that such politics of ULFA have limitations—after 30 years of military fight the organisation has to learn from its mistakes and take a realistic stock of the situation. They have deviated tremendously from their avowed goals and have become part of an international network. There are schisms and divisions in the organisation, [Page xvii]both vertically and horizontally. Sovereignty or secession is not an issue so dear to the Assamese society. The majority of the people of Assam do not support the methods of ULFA. But those deviations notwithstanding, the Indian State has to address the issues raised by the organisation. The issues that ULFA raises are the issues of the people of Assam—the State cannot crush them militarily. The State may win a battle but would lose the hearts of their own people.
Hiren Gohain, a highly celebrated intellectual of the state and instrumental in initiating peace talks between the government of India and ULFA, believes that the organisation raises certain sound principles of self-determination.2 A number of statistical surveys conducted by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) in collaboration with the Department of Political Science, gauhati University, and our own research on Human Security (The Plight of Civilians in Conflict Zone) revealed that the people of the region want a negotiated settlement of the vexed issue of insurgency. The people may not support the violent and terrorising methods of both the State and armed groups; however, there is an overwhelming approval of the ideological issues raised by groups like ULFA, with the exception of secession. ULFA's alliance with foreign agencies like Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) or Directorate general of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) is considered to be more a tactical alliance for their strategic survival. The armed group has many unique characteristics that make it different from other organisations of the state:
- It is the only organisation that speaks about the people of Assam rather than the Assamese people.
- It is the only organisation having representation from all communities—unlike the other caste-Hindu or ‘tribal’ and other ethnic organisations.
- At a time when other organisations have taken a bold stand against the immigrants, it has tried to broaden the Assamese nationality by incorporating the immigrants from Bangladesh into the framework of the people of Assam.
- It has strong anti-India, anti-Delhi stand.
[Page xviii]Although the organisation can claim to be the only one having representatives from all sections of the communities and groups, in the initial period the dominance of certain communities was very palpable. It is only in the post-1990s that the organisation has broadened its social base by incorporating various groups and communities into its fold. ULFA's emergence has to be seen in the context of contemporary history of Assam. ULFA is the culminating point of a movement that craves for a separate voice and identity for Assam. It is part of a movement that seeks to maintain the distinct identity of the composite Assamese people. It seeks to have control over its vast array of natural resources like land, crude oil, plywood, tea and forests. Quest for such a movement began during the period of the freedom struggle itself. During the period, the formulation of a future Assam province varied from an independent separate nation to the autonomous self-reliant state. There was always a fear of being inundated and overtaken by ‘stronger’ nationalities. Such insecurity was confronted by an articulation of a separate identity of Assamese people, which could be ensured through economic progress and cultural advancement. The protagonists of the freedom struggle in Assam contemplated a province which will be autonomous to fix its own destinations as an inseparable unit of the Indian State. ULFA is a logical conclusion of the process of denial of a space that began since the dawn of Independence. The entire trajectory moved through certain phases.
As we have stated above, the first phase began during the period of the freedom struggle itself. The Assamese middle class in the 1920s became highly apprehensive about the continuous immigration of East Bengal people to the region. The most worrying point for the middle class was that ‘these immigrants would in due course, further tilt the provinces’ demographic, cultural and political balance in favour of the Bengalis’.3 Assam's fight with the Centre remained the core of her politics even before the attainment of Independence. In its early period of formation, the Indian political leaders were in a hurry to form the Indian nation-state. In the process, feelings and grievances of some of the communities living in the periphery remained unanswered. The Indian ruling elites had shown great insensitivity and nonchalance to some of the fundamental questions of Assam.
[Page xix]The second phase of conflict (1947–85) can be considered as an attempt for assertion for resources, language and identity. The leaders of the Indian freedom struggle barring Gandhi and a few others were in a great hurry to capture power. In the process they neglected some of the genuine issues of the region. The first major difference of opinion between Assam and the Centre occurred over the question of settling the refugees from newly-created East Pakistan in the state.
The Centre's continuous discriminatory policies reflected from the very beginning of India's independence, particularly in the exploitation of the oil sector of Assam. For ensuring a greater share of the state in the oil sector, there emerged the popular oil refinery movement which was supported by all political parties in the state. In spite of Assam's increasing crude oil production, the government of India was not interested in establishing a new refinery in Assam. Realising the apathy of the Central government, the people of Assam belonging to all communities, languages and political outlook started a movement for the establishment of a large refinery in Assam in 1957.
According to Professor Tilottoma Misra, Assam, despite being the largest producer of tea, oil, plywood and forest products, remains one of the poorest and industrially backward states in the country.4 While the problem of continued influx and the ever-growing pressure on land coupled with the fear of the Assamese losing their socio-political identity seemed to be the immediate motivating factors of the movement, it was in actuality a popular outburst against decades of economic neglect of the state by the Central government. It is significant that the immediate popular movement which preceded the Assam Movement was the one led by the AASU on the issue of economic backwardness of the state.
The third phase of conflict with the Indian State began through regional movements and militancy broadly from 1979 to 2005. The Assam Movement had laid down the foundation for the growth of an independent Assam by ULFA. Although some writers have expressed serious doubt about the democratic content of the Assam Movement, it is one of the most popular mass-based movement in the post-Independence period of India. A strong emotional content notwithstanding, for the majority of the Assamese this was the last fight to [Page xx]ensure their identity and culture. The Assam Movement surfaced the already palpable secessionist feeling in Assam.
Majority of the leaders of the movement believed that regional political party that came out as a result of the Assam Accord failed to address the structural issues such as resource control, more powers to the state and economic development of the state, etc. The real problem is now diagnosed to be the exploitation by the Centre which could be brought to an end by an armed struggle against the State.
However, the armed rebellion by ULFA also surfaced certain structural limitations which had come into the forefront in the fourth phase of conflict with the Indian State, i.e., from 2005 onwards. Organisations like ULFA never bothered to look into the issues of governance and day-to-day problems that the people of the state used to confront on a daily basis. Struggle over land, forest and water have acquired a new dimension after the emergence of a peasant-based movement known as Krishak Mukti Sangram Samity (KMSS) in 2005 under the leadership of RTI activist Akhil Gogoi. Before launching KMSS, Gogoi was associated with another land and forest movement in the Doyang–Tengani region of the Golaghat district in 2002–2003. When the government started evicting the settlers, two organisations named Brihhattar Tengani Unnayan Sangram Samity and Dayang Mukti Sangarm Samity were formed under the leadership of Akhil Gogoi. gradually, the movement extended its activities in the districts such as Nagoan, Dhemaji and Lakhimpur in order to raise voice for the poor peasants and forest dwellers. Thus, movements centring on people's issues have become more popular and sustainable in comparison to the armed groups who have perennially neglected these issues for a dream of independent sovereign homeland.
However, issues remain. The ideological plank over which ULFA emerged remains unaddressed. It is to be seen how far the Indian State is sincere in accommodating the demands raised by ULFA. Or will it still rely on ‘Conflict Fatigue’ syndrome of the rebel leaders? ULFA in Assam represents what Sanjib Baruah prefers to call, in a terminology of Doug McAdam, Sidney Tarrow and Charles Tilly, as ‘contentious politics’.5
If we look at ULFA's ideology as ‘contentious politics’ it actually represents a continuum with other non-violent social movements, political [Page xxi]parties and interest groups. Claimants like ULFA can acquire access to power and can adapt to institutional politics; and then they become more like interest groups or conventional political parties.6 From that point, ULFA's violence is an instrumental violence, the basic premise of which is to bring certain structural changes in the behaviour and functioning of the Indian State.
Contemporary writings on the insurgency phenomenon in the region can be clubbed in a mutually antagonistic position. One school, constituted mostly by the security experts and scholars from the ‘mainstream’, conceptualises insurgency as a product of lack of development and unemployment. Security experts view groups like ULFA as puppets in the hands of foreign forces. Certain academics, particularly from the region, on the other hand, tend to overlook the role of external forces; there is a tendency to give salience to certain theoretical premises which hinge on the failure of the State in the region. Such mutually exclusive binary extrapolation actually tells us the half-truth.
This book is essentially a product of my association with the topic for more than 15 years. My interest in ULFA grew after my visit to a camp of ULFA in Bhutan in 1997. I express my gratitude to my underground friends for their very insightful exposure of the organisation. Interaction with the cadres has helped me in understanding what motivates a young boy/girl to join a path which is shrouded with life-threatening risks at every step. I owe an apology to them if I have not been able to do justice or give a sympathetic treatment to their struggle as my purpose is not to get enamoured by their individual sacrifice. My fieldwork in Bangladesh was very enriching as I had the opportunity to interact with a number of intellectuals, media personality, human rights groups and NGO workers. Among them, my interaction with Professor Imtiaz Ahmed, Professor Amena Mohsin, Professor Meghna Guha Thakurta (all from Dhaka University) was helpful in acquiring knowledge about their perception of insurgency and the role of Bangladeshi State in providing shelter to underground outfits of North East India.
I had a wide range of discussion with various officials of government of India and Assam. In a number of occasions, I was engaged in debates and discussions with g. M. Srivastav, the ex-DGP of Assam and [Page xxii]B. J. Mahanta, IGP (L&O), Assam Police, and also many others from the Army, Paramilitary Forces, the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and Special Branch (SB) who have wished to remain anonymous for their professional obligations. Many of them shared information which would have been otherwise impossible to gather. Of course, these sources were scrutinised and interrogated through the lenses of my orientation as a student of Social Sciences in general and Political Science in particular.
I am particularly grateful to my innumerable friends in the region for their help and support. I am particularly indebted to the leaders and cadres of ULFA (many of them have surrendered). I made it a point to interview them at the very first instance of their public appearance. I express my gratitude to various civil society leaders like Lachit Bordoloi, Bubumoni Goswami (from MASS), Dilip Patgiri (PCG member and Advisor, AJYCP), Ajit Bhuyan (PCG member and a human rights activist) and many others whom I cannot name them for want of space.
Subir Bhaumik—a prolific writer, journalist and a great admirer of the region—has always remained a great source of inspiration for me. I must thank my two dear friends—Professor Chandan Sarmah of Tezpur University and Dr Akhil Ranjan Dutta, Associate Professor of Political Science, gauhati University, for their meaningful association. Three of us dialogue, debate and discuss on contemporary issues of the region with varying perspectives.
My esteemed colleagues in the Department of Political Science, gauhati University—Professor Monirul Hussain, Professor Niru Hazarika, Professor Sandhya Goswami, Dr Alaka Sarma, Dr Akhil R. Dutta, Dr Jayanta K. Sarma, Dr Dhruba P. Sarma, Dr Shubrajit Konwar, Dr Joana Mehjebeen and Borosa Deka—have always inspired me in my intellectual journey. My wife asked me not to be formal in expressing my acknowledgement to her. Even at the risk of antagonising her, I must acknowledge my wife Gargi, sons Mahip and Adhip and daughter Nishtha for being constant sources of inspiration to me.
I shall always remain indebted to Professor Anuradha Dutta for her encouragement and guidance. I express my sincere gratitude and thanks to the entire family of SAGE Publications, especially Rekha Natarajan, Sugata Ghosh and Shambhu Sahu for their support. Finally, this book would not have been possible without the apt handling by Dhurjjati Sarma, the editor from SAGE.
1 Sanjib Baruah (ed.), Beyond Counter-Insurgency: Breaking the Impasse in North East India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2009), 4.
2 Hiren Gohain, ‘Chronicle of Violence and Terror: Rise of the United Liberation Front of Assam’, Economic and Political Weekly 42, no. 12 (24 March 2007): 1012–1018.
3 Amalendu Guha, ‘Nationalism: Pan-Indian and Regional, in a Historical Perspective’, in Nationalist Upsurge in Assam, ed. Arun Bhuyan (Guwahati: government of Assam, August 2000), 91.
4 Tilottoma Misra, ‘Assam: A Colonial Hinterland’, Economic and Political Weekly, 15, no. 39 (9 August 1980).
5 See Sanjib Baruah, ‘Separatist Militants and Contentious Politics in Assam, India’, Asian Survey, 49, no. 6 (2009): 951–974.
6 Sanjib Baruah, ‘The Rise and Decline of a Separatist Insurgency: Contentious Politics in Assam, India’, in Autonomy and Ethnic Conflict in South and South-East Asia, ed. Rajat Ganguly (London and New York: Routledge, 2012), 27–45.
About the Author[Page 349]
Nani Gopal Mahanta is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and Coordinator of Peace and Conflict Studies at Gauhati University, Assam, India. A former Rotary World Peace Fellow at the University of California, Berkeley (2002–04), he has published widely and has been a Visiting Fellow at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Norway. Currently, Mahanta is the President of North East India Political Science Association (NEIPSA).
Mahanta is a regular contributor to various national and regional newspapers and journals on the contemporary conflict issues in India's North East. They include Economic and Political Weekly, Socialist Perspective, India Today, The Hindustan Times, The Telegraph, The Assam Tribune, Amar Asom and Dainik Pratidin. He is also one of the most popular television commentators in the region. Currently the editor of Journal of Political Science, he has also co-edited a book entitled Conflict Dynamics in North East India: The Shifting Terrain (with Dilip Gogoi), published in February 2012.