Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application
Publication Year: 1997
What is a committed employee? Are such employees better or worse off than uncommitted employees? What are the organizational advantages and disadvantages of having a committed workforce? This book overviews academic and popular perspectives on commitment in employees. It examines the multiple faces of commitment and the links that have been established between the various forms of commitment and organizational behaviour. In addition, questions concerning individual differences, organizational characteristics, job characteristics and work experiences associated with commitment are explored. The volume concludes with a discussion of what organizations can do to manage commitment effectively, including under difficult circumst
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- What is a Committed Employee?
- Does Commitment Matter Anymore?
- Plan of the Book
- Chapter 2: Meaning of Commitment
- Nature of Commitment
- Focus of Commitment
- Integration of the Multidimensional Approaches
- Chapter 3: Consequences of Organizational Commitment
- Hypothesized Consequences of Organizational Commitment
- Organizational Commitment and Behavior: Research Evidence
- Summary and Conclusions
- Chapter 4: Development of Organizational Commitment
- Development of Affective Commitment
- Development of Continuance Commitment
- Development of Normative Commitment
- Summary and Conclusions
- Chapter 5: Managing for Commitment
- A Theoretical Framework
- Human Resource Management Practices
- Management of Change
- Summary and Implications
- Chapter 6: Multiple Commitments in the Workplace
- Generalizability of the Three-Component Conceptualization
- Multiple Commitments at Work
- Chapter 7: A Look Back and a Look Ahead
- A Look Back
- A Look Ahead
Advanced Topics in Organizational Behavior[Page ii]
The Advanced Topics in Organizational Behavior series examines current and emerging issues in the field of organizational behavior. Written by researchers who are widely acknowledged subject area experts, the books provide an authoritative, up-to-date review of the conceptual, research, and practical implications of the major issues in organizational behavior.
Editors: Julian Barling, Queen's University
Kevin Kelloway, University of Guelph
Editorial Board: Victor M. Catano, Saint Mary's University
Cary L. Cooper, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Daniel G. Gallagher, James Madison University
Jean Hartley, University of Warwick
Denise Rousseau, Carnegie-Mellon University
Paul Spector, University of South Florida
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston
Copyright © 1997 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
For information, address to:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications Ltd.
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
Greater Kailash I
New Delhi 110 048 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Meyer, John P., 1950-
Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application / John P. Meyer and Natalie J. Allen.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-7619-0104-3 (acid-free paper). —ISBN 0-7619-0105-1 (pbk.: acid-free paper)
1. Employee motivation. 2. Employee morale. 3. Work ethic. 4. Organizational behavior. I. Allen, Natalie Jean. II. Title. III. Series.
HF5549.5.M63M49 1997 96-45780
09 08 07 06 05 12 11 10 9 8
Acquiring Editor: Marquita Flemming
Editorial Assistant: Frances Borghi
Production Editor: Sherrise M. Purdum
Production Assistant: Karen Wiley
Typesetter/Designer: Marion S. Warren
Print Buyer: Anna Chin
[Page vii]To our families
We started to conduct research on commitment in the early 1980s. Our interest was stimulated initially by practical considerations: What made some volunteers in nonprofit organizations so highly committed to their work, and how might this sense of commitment be instilled in others? As we began to examine the literature for clues about how commitment develops and is maintained, we discovered little consensus on the meaning of commitment. We spent many hours discussing the various definitions and trying to determine who was “right.” Eventually, we came to the conclusion that commitment is a multifaceted construct and that our understanding of how people become committed to an organization, nonprofit or otherwise, is better served by acknowledging this complexity rather than by choosing one approach over another.
Our main objective in writing this book was to summarize what we have learned over the last decade and a half about what commitment is, how it develops, and what its implications are both for employees and for their organizations. Our focus is largely on the results of quantitative empirical research undertaken to establish general principles that apply across organizations (at least in North America). We recognize, therefore, that our treatment of the topic might have most obvious relevance to an academic audience, whether they are actively involved in commitment research or have a general interest in organizational behavior research.
[Page ix]It is our hope, however, that those with more practical interests will also benefit from reading this book. Indeed, we believe that the framework provided here will help provide a better understanding of the commitment process and allow practitioners to scrutinize carefully the reports of more in-depth qualitative analyses of what did or did not work in other organizations and to evaluate what programs are most likely to work for them. Our scientific approach, therefore, should complement the treatment provided in business and trade journals, as well as in the popular press.
The title of this book, Commitment in the Workplace, was chosen to reflect the various entities within the world of work to which one might become committed, including the organization, job, profession/occupation, manager/supervisor, team, and union. Indeed, it is becoming increasingly apparent that to explain why people do what they do at work, we need to understand the potentially complex relations among their various work and nonwork commitments. Nevertheless, the reader will discover that much of the theory and research discussed in this book focuses on employees' commitment to the organization. This focus reflects the state of the field: Only recently have researchers begun to look systematically at other work-relevant commitments. We attempt, at various points throughout the book, to demonstrate how what we have learned about organizational commitment might be applied to understanding commitment to other entities.
Some might question whether employee commitment is a relevant issue in this era of rapid change, including reengineering and downsizing. The comment made by one executive upon learning that we were involved in this project was, “I guess it will be a short book.” We acknowledge that relationships between organizations and their employees are indeed changing. This fact, however, does not undermine the value of understanding how commitments develop and influence the nature of employee-organization relationships. To the contrary, we believe that workers, as human beings, inevitably develop commitments of one form or another that have an influence on their behavior at work. By understanding when and how commitments develop and how they help shape attitudes and behaviors, organizations will be in a better position to anticipate the impact that change will have and to manage it more effectively.
The contributions of many individuals and organizations over the years have helped shape our thinking, our research program, and ultimately, this book. These include the many theorists and investigators whose work we cite throughout this book, including those whose work we turned to when we first became interested in commitment, and the more recent contributors to the literature whose work has consistently helped renew our interest and clarify our understanding. Our own [Page x]research was made possible by research grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and Imperial Oil of Canada, Ltd. Several former graduate students—Ramona Bobocel, Ian Gellatly, Greg Irving, and Cathy Smith—were active contributors in our research program. We were also very fortunate to have a number of very capable research assistants—Denise McLean, Patricia Lee, Alanna Leffley, Linda Irving, Jeff Nolan, Meridith Black, and Julie McCarthy—who spent many hours in the library and at the computer. Meridith and Julie also assisted greatly in the preparation of the final manuscript (and its previous incarnations). To each of these individuals we owe a sincere debt of gratitude. We also thank Julian Barling and Kevin Kelloway, the series editors, for inviting us to write this book, the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Marquita Flemming and the editorial staff at Sage for their help in the production process. Finally, we thank our parents—Doug and Trudy Allen and Gerry and Toddy Meyer—for their early support and encouragement, and our families—Steve, Jeffrey, and Sarah Lupker, and Trudy, Matthew, and Samantha Meyer—for being there when we needed them the most. It is to you that we dedicate this book.
Appendix: Measurement of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment[Page 116]
As we noted in Chapter 2, it is now generally recognized that commitment is a multidimensional construct. Our own research in the area of organizational commitment began with an attempt to illustrate how inconsistencies in the conceptualization and measurement of commitment might interfere with our understanding of the commitment process (Meyer & Allen, 1984). This early work led ultimately to the development of a three-component model of commitment and of measures of the three components: affective, continuance, and normative commitment (Allen & Meyer, 1990a; Meyer & Allen, 1991). This three-component framework served as the basis for our subsequent research and, in large measure, provides the structure for our discussion of commitment throughout this book.
Although of seemingly less relevance than research conducted to examine the development and consequences of commitment, particularly to those with applied interests, research conducted for purposes of development and evaluation of commitment measures is nevertheless important. Indeed, the meaningfulness of [Page 117]substantive research depends on it. In this appendix, we present the Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales referred to throughout this book, briefly describe how they were developed, and summarize the results of recent research as they pertain to the psychometric properties of these measures. A more complete review of this research is provided by Allen and Meyer (1996).
Schwab (1980) outlined a set of recommendations for the psychometric evaluation of measures used in organizational behavior research. Included among the recommendations is an examination of the reliability (e.g., internal consistency, temporal stability) and factor structure of the measures. Items within a scale should measure the same construct, scale scores should be relatively stable across time (assuming no major changes in conditions that influence the construct), and items written to measure one construct should not correlate highly with items intended to measure unrelated constructs. Beyond this, Schwab noted that the construct validity of a measure can be assessed by examining its correlations with other constructs and comparing these correlations with what is expected theoretically. In the case of the Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales being evaluated here, the three-component model described by Meyer and Allen (1991) provides such a theoretical framework, or “nomological net” (Cronbach & Meehl, 1955).Development of the Measures
Development of the Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales was based on the scale construction principles outlined by Jackson (1970) and described in detail elsewhere (Allen & Meyer, 1990a). Briefly, definitions of the three constructs were used to develop an initial pool of items that was then administered to a sample of men and women working in various occupations and organizations. Items were selected for inclusion in the scales on the basis of a series of decision rules that took into account the distribution of responses on the 7-point agree-disagree scale for each item, item-scale correlations, content redundancy, and the desire to include both positively and negatively keyed items. Each of the three scales resulting from this process comprised 8 items. These items are presented in Table A.1.[Page 118]
TABLE A.1 Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales Affective Commitment Scale Items
- I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career in this organization.
- I enjoy discussing my organization with people outside it.a
- I really feel as if this organization's problems are my own.
- I think I could easily become as attached to another organization as I am to this one. (R)a
- I do not feel like “part of the family” at my organization. (R)
- I do not feel “emotionally attached” to this organization. (R)
- This organization has a great deal of personal meaning for me.
- I do not feel a strong sense of belonging to my organization. (R)
Continuance Commitment Scale Items
- I am not afraid of what might happen if I quit my job without having another one lined up. (R)a
- It would be very hard for me to leave my organization right now, even if I wanted to.
- Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decided I wanted to leave my organization right now.
- It wouldn't be too costly for me to leave my organization in the near future. (R)a
- Right now, staying with my organization is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
- I believe that I have too few options to consider leaving this organization.
- One of the few negative consequences of leaving this organization would be the scarcity of available alternatives.
- One of the major reasons I continue to work for this organization is that leaving would require considerable personal sacrifice; another organization may not match the overall benefits I have here.
- If I had not already put so much of myself into this organization, I might consider working elsewhere.b
Normative Commitment Scale Items (Original)
- I think that people these days move from company to company too often.
- I do not believe that a person must always be loyal to his or her organization. (R)
- Jumping from organization to organization does not seem at all unethical to me. (R)
- One of the major reasons I continue to work for this organization is that I believe loyalty is important and therefore feel a sense of moral obligation to remain.
- If I got another offer for a better job elsewhere, I would not feel it was right to leave my organization.
- I was taught to believe in the value of remaining loyal to one organization.
- Things were better in the days when people stayed with one organization for most of their careers.
- I do not think that wanting to be a “company man” or “company woman” is sensible anymore. (R)
Normative Commitment Scale Items (Revised)
NOTE: Responses to each item are made on a 7-point scale with anchors labeled (1) strongly disagree and (7) strongly agree. R indicates a reverse-keyed item (scoring is reversed). The original scales comprise 8 items each (Allen & Meyer, 1990a); the revised scales each comprise 6 items (Meyer et al., 1993). For administration, items from the three scales are mixed to form a 24- (original) or 18- (revised) item series.
- I do not feel any obligation to remain with my current employer. (R)
- Even if it were to my advantage, I do not feel it would be right to leave my organization now.
- I would feel guilty if I left my organization now.
- This organization deserves my loyalty.
- I would not leave my organization right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it.
- I owe a great deal to my organization.
a Item included in the original but not in the revised scales.
b Item included in the revised Continuance Commitment Scale only.
A revision of the three scales was undertaken recently in response to some of the findings reported below. The revision was most extensive in the case of normative commitment (see Meyer et al., 1993). The revised scales are also [Page 119]reported in Table A.1. In the review that follows, no distinction is made between the original and revised scales except where analyses addressed the revision specifically.[Page 120]Reliability EstimatesInternal Consistency
Internal consistency of the three scales has typically been estimated by using coefficient alpha. The number of estimates obtained for the three scales range from a low of 20 for the Normative Commitment Scale to a high of more than 40 for the Affective Commitment Scale. Median reliabilities for the Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales, respectively, are .85, .79, and .73 (for actual estimates across studies, see Allen & Meyer, 1996, Table 1). With few exceptions, reliability estimates exceed .70.Temporal Stability
Temporal stability is evaluated by correlating measures of commitment obtained at different times (test-retest reliability). Relatively few published studies have reported test-retest reliability estimates, and those that have, have typically collected data from newcomers at various points during their first year of employment. Temporal stability tends to be lower when commitment is measured very early in employees' careers. Vandenberg and Self (1993), for example, found test-retest reliabilities as low as .38 for affective commitment and .44 for continuance commitment when commitment measured on the first day of work was correlated with commitment 6 months later. Meyer et al. (1991) and Meyer et al. (1993) found reliability estimates above .60 when the measures of affective, continuance, and normative commitment included in the correlation were obtained after at least 1 month on the job. Blau, Paul, and St. John (1993) found a test-retest reliability coefficient of .94 for the Affective Commitment Scale when administered 7 weeks apart to a sample of employees with an average tenure of more than 5 years. Together, these findings suggest that, as might be expected, commitment is in a state of flux in the early period of employment but quickly begins to stabilize.Factor Structure
The factor structure of the commitment measures has been examined in several studies using both exploratory and confirmatory analyses. Some analyses [Page 121]include items from all three measures; others included only Affective Commitment Scale and/or Continuance Commitment Scale items. For the most part, the results of both the exploratory (Allen & Meyer, 1990a; McGee & Ford, 1987; Reilly & Orsak, 1991) and confirmatory (Dunham et al., 1994; Hackett et al., 1994; Meyer, Allen, & Gellatly, 1990; Moorman et al., 1993; Shore & Tetrick, 1991; Somers, 1993; Vandenberghe, 1996) studies provide evidence to suggest that affective, continuance, and normative commitment are indeed distinguishable constructs. (For a more detailed summary of results, see Allen & Meyer, 1996.)
Factor analyses have also been conducted to determine whether the commitment measures are distinguishable from related constructs. These studies have provided evidence that the three commitment constructs are indeed distinguishable from measures of job satisfaction (Shore & Tetrick, 1991), career, job, and work values (Blau et al., 1993), career commitment (Reilly & Orsak, 1991), occupational commitment (Meyer et al., 1993), and perceived organizational support (Shore & Tetrick). This evidence helps in addressing concerns raised by Morrow (1983) about the contribution made by organizational commitment research (see Chapter 2 and Morrow, 1993, for a more detailed discussion of this issue).Tests of the Nomological Net
As noted above, the three-component model of commitment developed by Allen and Meyer (1990a; Meyer & Allen, 1991) outlines a set of hypothesized relations between the three commitment variables and other variables presumed to be antecedents and consequences of commitment. By demonstrating that the pattern of empirical findings matches the hypothesized pattern, further evidence is provided for the construct validity of the measures. We discuss the results of relevant studies (e.g., Allen & Meyer, 1990a; Bycio et al., 1995; Dunham et al., 1994; Hackett et al., 1994; Konovsky & Cropanzano, 1991; Meyer et al., 1990; Shore & Wayne, 1993; Whitener & Walz, 1993) in considerable detail in Chapters 3 and 4 and, therefore, do not do so again here. These findings are also discussed by Allen and Meyer (1996) specifically as they pertain to the construct validity of the measures. In general, the findings tend to be consistent with the prediction and add to our confidence in the construct validity of the measures.[Page 122]Unresolved Issues
Despite the generally supportive evidence described above, some findings suggest the need for further refinements in the conceptualization and measurement of commitment. Most notably, the Continuance Commitment Scale has been found in some studies to comprise two related dimensions—one reflecting lack of alternatives, and the other high personal sacrifice (Hackett et al., 1994; McGee & Ford, 1987; Meyer et al., 1990; Somers, 1993). The implications of this are unclear. McGee and Ford found that the two subscales correlated in opposite directions with affective commitment and concluded that these subscales measure somewhat different constructs. They advocated further development of the subscales. In contrast, others have found that the two dimensions/subscales are highly related and correlate similarly with other constructs (e.g., Hackett et al., 1994; Meyer et al., 1989). These findings, combined with evidence that the internal consistency of the full Continuance Commitment Scale is acceptable (Allen & Meyer, 1996), suggest that little may be gained by further development of the subscales. Nevertheless, users might be wise to evaluate the utility of using subscales on a case-by-case basis until this issue is resolved (Meyer et al., 1990).
Studies have also revealed stronger than expected correlations between the Affective Commitment Scale and the Normative Commitment Scale, suggesting that feelings of affective attachment and sense of obligation to an organization are not independent of one another (e.g., Hackett et al., 1994). The two scales also tend to show similar patterns of correlations with antecedent (particularly work experience) and outcome measures; the correlations involving the Affective Commitment Scale, however, tend to be somewhat stronger than those involving the Normative Commitment Scale (see Allen & Meyer, 1996). A recent modification of the Normative Commitment Scale did not correct these problems (Meyer et al., 1993).
Finally, Vandenberg and Self (1993) found that the factor structure of the Affective Commitment Scale and the Continuance Commitment Scale was somewhat unstable during the early months of employment, and the researchers cautioned that the scales might not be appropriate for use with new employees. Meyer and Gardner (1994) conducted similar analyses, however, and found little evidence of instability. The difference in findings might be because of differences in the timing of measurement in the two studies; Vandenberg and Self obtained their measures after 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months, whereas Meyer and Gardner administered their measures after 1, 6, and 12 months. In the light of these findings, researchers wanting to use these measures to examine changes in commitment [Page 123]and/or its correlations with other variables over time should determine that the factor structure is indeed stable over the time frame examined.Summary and Conclusions
The findings reported here provide considerable support for the reliability and validity of the Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales. Construct validation is, of course, an ongoing process. We identified a few areas where further investigation is required and acknowledge that others might arise as additional research is conducted.
Space does not permit us to provide a detailed review of other measures of commitment used in the research described in this book. Of these measures, the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire has received the most thorough and generally positive evaluation (see Mowday et al., 1979, and Mowday et al., 1982, for details). The measures of identification, internalization, and compliance developed by O'Reilly and Chatman (1986) have received somewhat mixed reviews (e.g., Caldwell et al., 1990; Harris et al., 1993; O'Reilly et al., 1991; Vandenberg et al., 1994). Becker and his colleagues (Becker, 1992; Becker et al., 1996) have developed modified versions of the identification and internalization constructs that show some promise. Measures used in other studies (e.g., Jaros et al., 1993; Mayer & Schoorman, 1992; Penley & Gould, 1988) have not received enough attention to provide an adequate evaluation at this time. As we noted in Chapter 2, consumers of commitment research should be sensitive to the considerable variability in the nature and quality of measures used. Moreover, scale labels and construct definitions can sometimes be confusing.[Page 124]
References[Page 125]1995). Previous work experience and organizational socialization: A longitudinal examination, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 839–862. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256748(1996). Affective reactions to the group and the organization. In M. A.West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 371–396). Chichester, UK: Wiley.(1990a). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x, & (1990b). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847–858. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256294, & (1993). Organizational commitment: Evidence of career stage effects?. Journal of Business Research, 26, 49–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2893%2990042-N, & (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043, & (1973). On operationalizing the concept of commitment. Social Forces, 51, 448–454., , & (1994). Organizational commitment and employees' performance ratings: Both type of commitment and type of performance count. Psychological Reports, 75, 1539–1551. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.3f.1539, & (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392596, & (1983). Organizational-professional conflict among U.S. and Israeli professional accountants. Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 153–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9922816, & (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Belmont, CA: Dorsey.(1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 488–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2524274([Page 126]1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256705(1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 803–829. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256569, , & (1996). Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 149–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256634, & (1993). Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 26, 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2893%2990043-O, Jr., , & (1990). Strategies of organizational socialization and their impact on newcomer adjustment. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11, 198–212., & (1991). Pre-employment predictors of union attitudes: The role of family socialization and work beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 725–731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.725, , & (1990). Predicting employee commitment to company and union: Divergent models. Journal of Occupational Commitment, 63, 49–61., , & (1994). Exploring the distinctive nature of work commitments: Their relationships with personal characteristics, job performance, and propensity to leave. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 14, 41–56., & (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/255959, & (1994). Professional and organizational commitment among engineers: Conflicting or complementing?. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, 108–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.293377, & (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/222820(1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256481(1993). Profiles of commitment: An empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 177–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140207, & (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 464–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256788, , , & (1993). Panel analysis of the moderating effects of commitment on job satisfaction, intent to quit, and health following organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 552–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.552, & (1992). Global assignments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., , & (1989). Using job involvement and organizational commitment interactively to predict turnover. Journal of Management, 15, 115–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500110, & (1993). On developing a general index of work commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 298–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1021, , & (1985). The measurement and prediction of career commitment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 277–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00201.x(1987). Using a person-environment fit model to predict job involvement and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 240–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2887%2990003-0(1962). Formal organization. San Francisco: Chandler., & (1969). Work values and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 456–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028653(1988). Psychological stressors associated with industrial relations. In C. L.Cooper & R.Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work (pp. 175–205). Chichester, UK: Wiley., & ([Page 127]1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in the global context. Academy of Management Review, 16, 262–290., & (1983). Realistic job previews: A critical appraisal and future research directions. Academy of Management Review, 8, 612–619.(1995). Economic dependency on work: A moderator of the relationship between organizational commitment and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 261–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256735, , & (1994). Jobshift: How to prosper in a workplace without jobs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.(1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39–61.(1990). When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reaction to the layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 389–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2890%2990065-T, , , & (1987). Survivors' reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help from our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392882, , , , & (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 241–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393223, , & (1993). Interactive effect of job content and content on the reactions of layoff survivors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 187–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124, , , , & (1988). Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 139–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.139, , & (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393914(1976). Measurement of beliefs. Human Relations, 29, 1177–1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872677602901206(1992). Employee ownership, attitudes, and turnover: An empirical assessment. Human Relations, 45, 711–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500704(1993). The effects of employee ownership on employee attitudes: An integrated causal model and path analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 633–657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00319.x(1988). Successful partnerships: HR and strategic planning at eight top firms. Organizational Dynamics, 17, 27–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2888%2990017-4(1989). The human side of mergers and acquisitions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., & (1995). Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.468, , & (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality, 1, 103–127., & (1990). Building organizational commitment: A multi-firm study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 245–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00525.x, , & (1994). Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource Management, 33, 189–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330204(1993, August 29). If cultures don't fit, mergers may fail. New York Times, p. F9., & (1994). The human effects of mergers and acquisitions. In C. L.Cooper & D. M.Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 47–61). New York: John Wiley., & ([Page 128]1982). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. Boston: Kent.(1993). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned?. Academy of Management Executive, 7, 95–104.(1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work?. American Psychologist, 50, 928–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.11.928(1993). How HR drives TQM. Personnel Journal, 72, 48B-480.(1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 730–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.730, , , , & (1991). Career stage as a moderator of the relationships between organizational commitment and its outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 253–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00558.x(1993a). Age and tenure in relation to organizational commitment: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 143–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1402_2(1993b). On the discriminant validity of the Meyer and Allen (1984) measure of organizational commitment: How does it fit with the work commitment construct?. In N. S.Bruning (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Administrative Science Association of Canada: Organizational Behavior, 14, 82–91.(1995). A multidimensional approach to the relation between organizational commitment and nonwork participation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 189–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1012, & (1990). A re-examination of the side-bet theory as applied to organizational commitment: A meta-analysis. Human Relations, 43, 1015–1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679004301005, & (1987). Comparative effects of personal and situational influences on job outcomes of new professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 558–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.558, , & (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040957, & (1981). Functional turnover: An empirical assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 716–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.716, , & (1989). Career versus organizational commitment: Antecedents and consequences of retail salespeoples' commitment. Journal of Retailing, 65, 80–106., , & (1991). Developing and testing a model of survivor responses to layoffs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 302–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2891%2990032-H, , & (1991). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. In R. M.Steers & L. W.Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (44–57). New York: McGraw-Hill., & (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 40, 445–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872678704000704, & (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 370–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.370, , & (1988). Toward a strategic perspective of human resource management. In L.Dyer (Ed.), Human resource management: Evolving roles and responsibilities (pp. 1–46). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs., & (1991). Person-job fit: Aconceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L.Cooper & I. T.Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 285–357). New York: John Wiley.(1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46, 641–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00889.x([Page 129]1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029(1990). The person-environment fit approach to stress: Recurring problems and some suggested solutions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 293–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110405, & (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51, , & (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500, , , & (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134(1994). How to increase employee loyalty while you downsize. Business Horizons, 37, 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813%2894%2990032-9(The end of corporate loyalty. (1986, August 4). Business Week, pp. 42–49.1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21, 1–25., , , , & (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 596–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/255909(1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 78–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073%2881%2990016-7, & (1989). Managing layoffs: Experiences at the Challenger disaster site and the Pittsburgh Steel Mills. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 52–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2889%2990031-4, & (1983). Acomparison of two organizational commitment scales. Personnel Psychology, 36, 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00505.x, & (1991). Candidates' reactions to assessment centers and their outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 117–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00547.x(1992). Support for profit sharing and organizational commitment: A path analysis. Human Relations, 45, 507–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500505, & (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256422, & (For better or worse. (1987, January 12). Business Week, pp. 38–40.1993, July-August). After the layoff: Closing the barn door before all the horses are gone. Business Horizons, 36, 34–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813%2805%2980117-X, & (1984). Commitment to company and union: Parallel models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 367–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.367, & (1991). Predictors and outcomes of different patterns of organizational and union loyalty. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 129–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00548.x, & (1995). Impact of early socialization on union commitment and participation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 147–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.147, , , & (1989). Career experiences, perceptions of employment practices, and psychological commitment to the organization. Human Relations, 42, 975–991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872678904201102, & (1995). The effects of understaffing on individual and group performance in professional and trade occupations. Journal of Management, 21, 175–190., & (1995). Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 469–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160507(1981). Psychology. New York: Norton.([Page 130]1989). Attractiveness of child care and related employer-supported benefits and policies to married and single parents. Child & Youth Care Quarterly, 18, 23–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01086798, , Koch- , , & (1990). Dual allegiance: Renewal, reconsideration, and recantation. Personnel Psychology, 43, 37–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02005.x, & (1980). Commitment to the union: Development of a measure and an examination of its correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 479–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.479, , , , & (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 165–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092623(1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01385031(1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a worksite smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.288(1979). The relationship between job insecurity and turnover and its differential effect on employee quality level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA., & (1986). Rebalancing the workforce at IBM: A case study of redeployment and revitalization. Organizational Dynamics, 14, 30–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2886%2990042-2, , & (1971). An investigation of the role of career salience in vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1, 209–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2871%2990022-4(1993). Multiple commitments at work and extra-role behavior during three stages of organizational tenure. Journal of Business Research, 26, 31–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2893%2990041-M(1992). Antecedents to commitment to a parent company and a foreign operation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 65–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256473, & (1991). Effects of work redesign on employee perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors: A long-term investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 425–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256449(1996, April). Professional association participation: An application and extension of labor union models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA., & (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01757.x, & (1994). Professional/organizational commitment and job satisfaction for employed lawyers. Human Relations, 47, 801–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700703, & (1994). Human resource practices as communications and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33, 447–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330311, & (1994). Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 617–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.617, , & (1994). Further assessments of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 15–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.15, , & (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley., & (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391488, , & (1976). Occupations and the social structure ((2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: HarperCollins., & ([Page 131]1993). Psychological attachment: Relationships with job characteristics, attitudes, and preferences for newcomer development. Group and Organization Management, 18, 459–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601193184005, , , & (1987). Pack your own parachute: How to survive mergers, takeovers, and other corporate disasters. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.(1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1994). The psychology of mergers and acquisitions. In C. L.Cooper & I. T.Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 247–281). New York: John Wiley., & (1986). Turnover functionality versus turnover frequency: A note on work attitudes and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 606–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.606, & (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 555–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393833, & (1994). Organizational commitment: One of many commitments or key mediating construct?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1568–1587. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256799, & (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3), 635–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256741(1990). HRM practices and employee commitment: Possibilities, pitfalls, and paradoxes. British Journal of Management, 1, 147–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1990.tb00003.x, , & (1989). An investigation of assessment-based development centers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 4, 11–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001716, , & (1989). An empirical assessment of salesperson motivation, commitment, and job outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 9, 25–33., , & (1996). Further assessments of a three-component model of occupational commitment: Generalizability and differences across occupations. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Brunswick, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada., , & (1994). Reexamination of the met-expectations hypothesis: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 937–949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.937, & (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D.Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.(1990). Relationship of job stress and Type-A behavior to employees' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychosomatic health problems, and turnover motivation. Human Relations, 43, 727–738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679004300802(1993). Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 951–995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256642, , , & (1994). Family role identification as a source of gender differences in the relationship between parenthood and organizational commitment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.(1979). Leader behavior in a police command bureaucracy: A closer look at the quasi-military model. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2989873, & (1991). Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 309–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073%2867%2990024-4([Page 132]1991). Combining head and heart in complex organizations: A test of Etzioni's dual compliance structure hypothesis. Human Relations, 44, 1255–1272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679104401202, & (1993). An exploratory investigation into the relationships between promotion and turnover: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study. Journal of Management, 19, 33–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900103, , , & (1990). A longitudinal assessment of the impact of selected organizational influences on salespeoples' organizational commitment during early employment. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 333–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172590, , , & (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29 (2), 262–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256188(1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33, 499–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092438(1983). Frontiers for strategic human resource planning and management. Human Resource Management, 22, 9–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930220104(1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341(1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206(Pre-employment predictors of union attitudes: The moderating role of parental identification. Journal of Social Psychology., , & (in press).1992). The construct validity of union commitment: Development and dimensionality of a shorter scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 197–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00498.x, , & (1994). Pre-employment predictors of union attitudes: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 631–634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.631, & (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106(1977). Issues in the study of “professionals” in organizations: The case of scientists and engineers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 329–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073%2877%2990034-4, , & (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to beliefSan Diego, CA: Academic Press.(1993). Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 502–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256590, & (1992). Relationship between an organization's actual human resource efforts and employee attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 17 (2), 135–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601192172003, , & (1992). Nonwork participation and work attitudes: A test of scarcity vs. expansion models of personal resources. Human Relations, 45, 775–795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500802(1987). Employee stock ownership and employee attitudes: A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 319–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.319(1988). Correlates of employee satisfaction with stock ownership: Who likes an ESOP most?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 630–638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.630, & (1991). Behavioral commitment and tenure of new employees: A replication and extension. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 194–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256307, & (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 168–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199, , & (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.698, & ([Page 133]1988). Human resource management and a culture of respect: Effects on employees' organizational commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 57–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01385453(1991). Fairness, legal compliance, and organizational commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 283–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01385033(1986). High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.(1992). Affective attachment to nested groups: A choice process theory. American Sociological Review, 57, 327–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096239(1992). A study of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Unpublished master's thesis, Sung Kyun Kwan University, Seoul, Korea.(1992). Commitment propensity, organizational commitment, and voluntary turnover: A longitudinal study of organizational entry processes. Journal of Management, 18, 15–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800102, , , & (1992, June). HR policies ensure the mirage won't vanish. HR Magazine, 85–91.(1994). Exploring the organizational commitment-performance linkage in marketing: A study of life insurance salespeople. Journal of Business Research, 29, 57–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2894%2990027-2, , & (1980). What should be done with equity theory?. In K. J.Gergen, M. S.Greenberg, & R. H.Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2(1989). Employee work attitudes and management practice in the U.S. and Japan: Evidence from a large comparative survey. California Management Review, 32, 89–106.(1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum., & (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0021692, & (1995). A field study of distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 99–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02249273, & (1985). Organizational commitment: A comparison of American, Japanese, and Korean employees. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 213–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256069, , & (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2524483(1985). Relational contracts: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, 483–525.(1995). A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 418–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.418, , , & (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment: Influences of work positions and family roles. Work and Occupations, 20, 368–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888493020003005, , & (1977). Organizational commitment and turnover: A predictive study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391746, & (1993). Stress and the union steward's role. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 433–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140505, & (1988). A causal model of organizational commitment in a military training environment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 321–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2888%2990023-1(1991). Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 127–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.127, & ([Page 134]1989). A causal model of the antecedents of organizational commitment among professionals and nonprofessionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 299–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2889%2990022-5, & (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171, & (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 671–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256492, & (1985). Strategies for reducing employee turnover: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 342–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.342, & (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the Affective and Continuance Commitment Scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 638–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.638, & (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.424, , & (1992). The influence of layoff severity on postlayoff union commitment among survivors: The moderating effect of the perceived legitimacy of a layoff account. Personnel Psychology, 45, 579–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00861.x(1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372, & (1986, June). Development and consequences of three components of organizational commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Whistler, British Columbia., & (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822%2891%2990011-Z, & (1995, May). Work characteristic and work attitude relations: Moderating effect of attributions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL., & (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 710–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.710, , & (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538, , & (1991). Development of organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal study of pre- and post-entry influences. Journal of Management, 17, 717–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700406, , & (1994, March). Assessment of change in organizational commitment during the first year of employment: An application of confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Research Methods Division, Conference on Causal Modelling, West Lafayette, IN., & (Test of the moderating effect of work values on the relations between early work experiences and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior., , & (in press).1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 152–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.152, , , , & (1995). Organizational entry: An investigation of newcomer communication behavior and uncertainty. Communication Research, 22, 54–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365095022001003, , & ([Page 135]1984). Designing strategic human resource systems. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 36–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2884%2990030-5, & (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030477, & (1994). Relationships between self-concepts, aspirations, emotional responses, and intent to leave a downsizing organization. Human Resource Management, 33, 281–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330208(1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 209–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01419445, , & (1980). Structural influences on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 50–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2880%2990014-7, & (1993). Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 173–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.173(1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256798(1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 486–500.(1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, CT: JAI.(1986). On assessing measures of work commitment. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 7, 139–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030070206, & (1993). Introduction: Understanding and managing loyalty in a multi-commitment world. Journal of Business Research, 26, 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2893%2990038-Q, & (1988). Determinants of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 41, 467–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872678804100604(1974). Unit performance, situational factors, and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 231–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073%2874%2990048-8, , & (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press., , & (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2879%2990072-1, , & (1992). Employee commitment: Resolving some issues. Work and Occupations, 19, 211–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888492019003001, , & (1995). “Not on seat”: An investigation of some correlates of organizational citizenship behavior in Nigeria. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 111–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01069.x(1989). Organizational commitment among Japanese and U.S. workers. Organizational Studies, 10, 281–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000301(1993). Changes in employee attitudes after an acquisition: A longitudinal analysis. Group and Organization Management, 18, 390–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601193184002, & (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256591, & (1994). Using organizational commitment and job involvement to predict budgetary slack: A research note. Accounting Organization and Society, 19, 289–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682%2894%2990036-1(1986). The role of human resource management practices in predicting organizational commitment. Group & Organization Studies, 11, 335–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0364108286114003(1995). Voices of survivors: Words that downsizing CEOs should hear. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 23–34., & (1981). The commitment and job tenure of new employees: Some evidence of postdecisional justification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 597–616. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392342, & ([Page 136]1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492, & (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256404, , & (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.(1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x, & (1987). Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets. Industrial Relations, 26, 46–67.(1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963–974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.963(1993). Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 569–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.569(1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849–874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00971.x, & (1985). The paradox of “corporate culture”: Reconciling ourselves to socialization. California Management Review, 27, 26–41.(1993). Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers: Their psychological involvement and effects on employee coworkers. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1082–1096. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256646(1988). Etzioni's model of organizational involvement: A perspective for understanding commitment to organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030090105, & (1987). Organizational commitment: Pre-employment propensity and initial work experiences. Journal of Management, 13, 163–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300113, & (1990). Employee ownership: Implications for management. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 32–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2890%2990062-T, & (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 706–719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.706, & (A question of loyalty. (1991, September 23). Newsweek, p. 8.1989). An anatomy of autonomy: Managing professionals. Academy of Management Executive, 3, 216–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.1989.4274740(1987). Commitment and the organization: The organization man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12, 460–471.(1990). The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 361–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110504(1993). Cross-cultural research on organizational commitment: A review and application of Hofstede's value survey module. Journal of Business Research, 26, 91–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963%2893%2990045-Q(1991). Interrelationships of work commitment constructs. Work and Occupations, 18, 194–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888491018002004, & (1990). The behavioral expression of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 210–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2890%2990028-Z, , & (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10, 465–476.(1986). Conflict and organizational commitments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 508–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.508(1996). The loyalty effect. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.([Page 137]1991). A career stage analysis of career and organizational commitment in nursing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 311–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2891%2990041-J, & (1981). Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations, 12, 1013–1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872678103401201, & (1969). An empirical study of Howard Becker's side-bet theory. Social Forces, 47, 475–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2574537, & (1991). The impact of personnel selection and assessment methods on candidates. Human Relations, 44, 963–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679104400904, , , & (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 137–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256773, , & (1974). For harmony and strength: Japanese white-collar organization in anthropological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1989). Personal consequences of employee commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 649–661. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256438(1989). Psychological and implicit contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942(1995). Promises in action: Psychological contracts in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1995). Changing individual-organization attachments. In A.Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (290–322). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., & (1989, August). A post office initiative to stamp out stress. Personnel Management, 40–45., , & (1989). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment: A study of salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 9, 30–41., & (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 211–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.211(1977a). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B.Staw & G.Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1–54). Chicago: St. Clair.(1977b). Commitment is too easy!. Organizational Dynamics, 6, 62–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2877%2990035-3(1995). Corporate support in the aftermath of a natural disaster: Effects on employee strains. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 504–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256690, , & (1991). Beyond the call of duty: A field study of extra-role behavior in voluntary organizations. Human Relations, 44, 569–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679104400603, & (1994). Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 455–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.455, , & (1980). Organizational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.(1981). Differentiating commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6, 589–599.(1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 207–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.1987.4275740, & (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3–43.(1992). A field study of employees' attitudes and behaviors after promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 511–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.511, , & (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 110–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256304, & (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. New York: Freeman.([Page 138]1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 143–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391824(1994). Mediating influences on the employee commitment-job performance relationship. Unpublished manuscript., & (1991). A construct validity study of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 637–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.637, & (1994). The psychological contract as an exploratory framework in the employment relationship. In C. L.Cooper & D. M.Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 91–109). New York: John Wiley., & (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774–780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.774, & (1995). Human resource management and firm performance: Testing a contingency model of executive controls. Journal of Management, 21, 711–737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100407, & (1993). A test of the relationship between affective and continuance commitment using non-recursive models. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 185–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1993.tb00528.x(1995). Organizational commitment, turnover, and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160107(1994). Organizational commitment and whistle-blowing. Group and Organization Management, 19, 270–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601194193003, & (1993). Examining the psychometric properties of a scale on a smallish sample: An example using an occupational commitment scale. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 7, 90–93., , & (1974). Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of changing a major organizational reward: A natural field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 742–751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036292(1977, August). Two sides of commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.(1987). Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. In L. L.Cummings & B. M.Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 297–332). Greenwich, CT: JAI., & (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391745(1993). Workers' evaluations of the “ends” and the “means”: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1022, & (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1991). Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.759, , , & (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x, & (1989). Employee ownership and perceptions at work. Work and Occupations, 16, 26–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888489016001002, , & (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S.Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (1994). Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 666–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.666, , & ([Page 139]1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00962.x, & (1993). Assessing newcomers' changing commitments to the organization during the first 6 months of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 557–568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.557, & (1994). A critical examination of the internalization, identification, and compliance commitment measures. Journal of Management, 20, 123–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000106, , & (1996). Assessing organizational commitment in a Belgian context: Evidence for the three-dimensional model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 371–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00778.x(1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209–264., & (1989). The value content of organizational mission as a factor in the commitment of members. Psychological Reports, 65, 27–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.19188.8.131.52, , & (1993). Organizational dependence and the likelihood of complying with organizational pressures to behave unethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 245–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01686452(1979). Dual unions and political processes in organizations. Industrial Relations, 18, 32–43., & (1993). Professional and organizational commitment: Compatible or incompatible?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 333–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1023(1985). Toward a strategy of eliciting employee commitment based on policies of mutuality. In R. E.Walton & P. R.Lawrence (Eds.), Human resource management trends and challenges. Boston: Harvard Business School.(1980). Organizational entry. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.(1992). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, orientation, and socialization of newcomers ((2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.1989). Organizational entry research: Current status and future directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 7, 59–120., & (1992). The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 288–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.288, , , & (1990). A comparative analysis of organizational commitment among workers in the cooperative and private sectors. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 11, 93–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X90111005, & (1993). Exchange theory determinants of affective and continuance commitment and turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 265–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1019, & (1956). The organization man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.(1982). Commitment in organizations: Anormative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418–428.(1977). Commitment: A behavioral approach to job involvement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10, 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2877%2990041-0, & (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305, & (1992). Effects of group-level and individual-level variation in leader behaviors on subordinate attitudes and performance. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 65, 115–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00489.x, , & (1988). Antecedents of value based and economic organizational commitment. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada—Organizational Behavior Division, 9, 124–133.([Page 140]1990). Students' commitment to their academic program: Antecedents and consequences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Whistler, British Columbia.(Workplace of the future: A report of the Conference on the Future of the American Workplace. (1993). New York: U.S. Departments of Commerce and Labor.1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 295–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800205, & (1994). Interpersonal attachment and organizational commitment: Subgroup hypothesis revisited. Human Relations, 47, 329–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700305, , & (1989). Contrasting group and organizational commitment: Evidence for differences among multilevel attachments. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 267–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030100306, & (
About the Authors[Page 150]
John P. Meyer received his Ph.D. in 1978 from the University of Western Ontario, where he is Professor and Director of the Industrial and Organizational Psychology program. In addition to his work on commitment, he has conducted research in the areas of work motivation, organizational justice, conflict management, personality and job performance, and performance appraisal. His research has been published in leading journals in the fields of I/O psychology (e.g., Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Occupational Psychology) and management (e.g., Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Management). He is currently involved in research to examine the cross-cultural generalizability of the commitment model he developed with Natalie Allen.
Natalie J. Allen received her Ph.D. in 1985 from the University of Western Ontario, where she is Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology. Prior to joining the Psychology Department, she was Director of the Center for Administrative and Information Studies, a multidisciplinary research and teaching unit at Western. Although much of her research has focused on commitment in the workplace, other research interests include cross-cultural issues within organizational behavior and the psychology of work teams. Her work has appeared in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Evaluation and Program Planning, Journal of Vocational Behavior, and Academy of Management Journal.