• Entry
  • Reader's guide
  • Entries A-Z
  • Subject index

The is-ought problem in ethics arises from the is-ought, fact-value distinction. It is the problem of moving from the factual to the normative, of obtaining a prescriptive claim from a set of descriptive claims.

The problem was first raised by David Hume in the 18th century; he pointed out that while many ethicists make claims about what ought to be solely from the basis of what is, there is a big difference between the two, and writers make an imperceptible switch from is claims to ought claims with no explanation offered. He argues that the move to the ought introduces a new relation or affirmation that needs to be clarified and justified. But he can find no justification, the implication being that such a move cannot ...

    • Loading...
    locked icon

    Sign in to access this content

    Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

    • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
    • Read modern, diverse business cases
    • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles