The Social Thought of Erving Goffman

Books

Michael Hviid Jacobsen & Søren Kristiansen

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Social Thinkers Series

    Series Editor

    A. Javier Treviño, Wheaton College, Norton, MA

    Published

    The Social Thought of Georg Simmel, By Horst J. Helle

    The Social Thought of Karl Marx, By Justin P. Holt

    The Social Thought of Erving Goffman, By Michael Hviid Jacobsen and Søren Kristiansen

    The Social Thought of Émile Durkheim, By Alexander Riley

    The Social Thought of C. Wright Mills, By A. Javier Treviño

    Forthcoming

    The Social Thought of Talcott Parsons, By Helmut Staubmann

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Series Editor's Foreword

    The SAGE Social Thinkers series is dedicated to making available compact, reader-friendly paperbacks that examine the thought of major figures from within and beyond sociology. The books in this series provide concise introductions to the work, life, and influences of the most prominent social thinkers. Written in accessible and provocative prose, these books are designed for advanced undergraduate and graduate students of sociology, politics, economics, and social philosophy, as well as for scholars and socially curious general readers.

    The first few volumes in the series are devoted to the “classical” thinkers—Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Georg Simmel, George Hebert Mead, Talcott Parsons, and C. Wright Mills—who, through their seminal writings, laid the foundation for much of current social thought. Subsequent books will feature more “contemporary” scholars as well as those not yet adequately represented in the canon: Jane Addams, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Harold Garfinkel, Norbert Elias, Jean Baudrillard, and Pierre Bourdieu. Particular attention is paid to those aspects of the social thinker's personal background and intellectual influences that most impacted his or her approach in better understanding individuals and society.

    Consistent with SAGE's distinguished track record of publishing high-quality textbooks in sociology, the carefully assembled volumes in the Social Thinkers series are authored by respected scholars committed to disseminating the discipline's rich heritage of social thought and to helping students comprehend key concepts. The information offered in these books will be invaluable for making sense of the complexities of contemporary social life and various issues that have become central concerns of the human condition: inequality, social order, social control, deviance, the social self, rationality, reflexivity, and so on.

    These books in the series can be used as self-contained volumes or in conjunction with textbooks in sociological theory. Each volume concludes with a Further Readings chapter intended to facilitate additional study and research. As a collection, the Social Thinkers series will stand as a testament to the robustness of contemporary social thought. Our hope is that these books on the great social thinkers will give students a deeper understanding of modern and postmodern Western social thought and encourage them to engage in sociological dialogue.

    Premised on Newton's aphorism, “If I have seen farther, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants” (an aphorism, incidentally, that was introduced into sociology by Robert K. Merton, himself a towering figure in the discipline), the Social Thinkers series aims to place its readers on the shoulders of the giants of 19th- and 20th-century social thought.

    Acknowledgments

    In this volume of the SAGE Social Thinkers series, we are proud to present the work of one of the key sociologists of the 20th century, namely Erving Goffman. His work has intrigued and inspired new generations of sociologists and students within neighboring disciplines such as anthropology, psychology, criminology, media studies, behavioral sciences, and philosophy to take seriously what people say and do in ordinary, everyday encounters.

    We want to extend our gratitude to A. Javier Treviño for inviting us along on this exciting project and for his competent suggestions for revisions of the manuscript. Some of the material used in this book is revised, expanded, and updated from a Danish introductory book to the work of Erving Goffman titled Erving Goffman—sociologien om det elementære livs sociale former [Erving Goffman—The Sociology of the Social Forms of Elementary Life] published by Hans Reitzels Publishing House of Copenhagen in 2002. We are grateful for their permission to publish revised and translated parts of this book in this volume, thereby making it accessible to an English-speaking audience. We also want to extend our gratitude to Kirsten Gammelgaard for assistance in translating some extracts from this Danish volume. Moreover, we are grateful to Routledge of London—the publisher of The Contemporary Goffman (edited by Michael Hviid Jacobsen in 2010)—in which an earlier version of Chapter 4 appeared and from which the introductions to certain ideas and points have been extracted.

    Michael HviidJacobsen, SørenKristiansen, Aalborg, autumn 2013
  • Glossary

    • Abduction A mode of reasoning or logic of inference that borrows insights from, respectively, induction and deduction but that—contrary to their clear-cut theory generation or theory testing—is primarily concerned with a line of reasoning that moves from observation to the proposition of a hypothesis that can account for or explain the observed phenomenon (at times called qualified guessing).
    • Backstage One of the important regions in Goffman's dramaturgy. “Backstage” describes the activities that take place behind the scenes. Being backstage, actors may relax and feel less restrained by interactional roles although not necessarily behaving authentically (see frontstage).
    • Character contests An interactional sequence involving a confrontation between two individuals both attempting to maintain their face at the other's expense.
    • Chicago School Descriptive label used to define the researchers—sociologists and social workers—working at the sociology department at the University of Chicago from the late 19th century and onward and who, despite differences in themes and approaches, particularly promoted an interactionist research focus and relied on qualitative research methods.
    • Civil inattention A minor interaction ritual and type of unfocused interaction by which people acknowledge the presence of others without violating their privacy. By performing civil inattention, people display themselves as nonthreatening interactional parties.
    • Creative abduction A notion invented by Umberto Eco to describe a type of abduction (see abduction) that, in particularly imaginative and creative way, seeks to account for, give meaning to, or explain a given observed phenomenon.
    • Deference The behaviors or courtesies by which actors demonstrate respect or appreciation of other people's selves. To receive signs of deference, people need to behave in appropriate ways (see demeanor).
    • Definition of the situation Designating the interactional process involving individuals’ cooperation regarding the maintenance or negotiation of a particular way of understanding a social situation. A specific definition of the situation involves specific interactional norms and role requirements.
    • Demeanor The appearance and behavior of a person. When presenting himself in good demeanor and thus recognizing interactional norms, a person will receive deference from the social environment (see deference).
    • Dramaturgy The use of theatrical and dramaturgical concepts to describe aspects of social life. Dramaturgy focuses on the performative and role-playing aspects of social interaction. Goffman used the dramaturgical concepts to describe the elements and processes of the interaction order.
    • Felicity's condition Denotes the background assumption or principle underlying all other background assumptions in verbal and nonverbal interaction, which binds social interaction together and makes it safe, recognizable, understandable, and meaningful to participants.
    • Footing A notion closely connected to that of frame that refers to the ways in which participants in verbal interaction align themselves to others or to the content of what is being said in a given social situation.
    • Frame A concept that captures the mental equipment people actively draw on when trying to understand the situations and occurrences taking place around them and that helps them organize their experiences and navigate in social situations.
    • Frame analysis The name for the analysis of frames, which are those mental maps, matrices of perception, or implicit and underlying understandings that govern our comprehension and definition of situations and guide our actions. Frame analysis involves trying to understand why people act in certain ways and how they organize their experiences according to various specific frames.
    • Frontstage An important region in Goffman's dramaturgy. Engaging in a performance on the frontstage, people perceive themselves to be in front of an audience, and thus they attempt to make impressions by playing roles and by giving and giving off information.
    • Genderism A term reserved for the gender-based construction of gender roles, which, for example, involve predictable representations of men and women, often stereotypical gender expectations and gender images, a highly organized arrangement between the sexes, different gender identities, and gender-specific practices.
    • Grounded theory A methodological approach building on a radical inductivist position that, through specified sampling, coding, and analytical procedures, is primarily concerned with generating concepts and constructing theory based on the collection of data material rather than on testing or verifying existing theories.
    • Impression management The acts by which people create impressions of themselves and situations for an audience. This involves the information that people purposely give and information given off unknowingly as well as the monitoring of others in order to detect their impression management.
    • Interaction order A social domain regulated by certain norms in which people are physically copresent. According to Goffman, the interaction order is the order that can be observed in people's face-to-face interactions and an order worthy of study in its own right.
    • Interaction ritual The defensive or protective acts and procedures used in social interaction to display respect for others and to avoid embarrassment and threats to the course of social interaction. Interaction ritual involves a symbolic aspect as people display respect for individuals’ faces and for the underlying social order.
    • Keying Concept that means something like “using a key” and refers to the utterances or actions that signal the meaning of interaction to participants, including its laminations, its relation to different frames, and so forth. When using specific keys, we unlock and define or redefine situations in different ways.
    • Labeling theory A theoretical perspective on deviance rooted in symbolic interactionism defining labeling as a dynamic and interactive process involving initial acts and societal reaction resulting in the definition of individuals as deviant as a result of their violation of socially constructed rules.
    • Looping A source of mortification involving an interactive process by which an individual's attempt to protect himself against mortification is interpreted as resistance and treated as an aspect of his failure.
    • Maverick Someone who consciously stands outside of, straddles, or sits astride the barricades between official and well-established paradigms in social research and provides an original perspective.
    • Metaphor Textual or literary device used to show or propose the similarity between two—often unconnected—realms of being (for example, everyday life and theatrical performance) that, through their combination, imaginatively helps shed light on overlooked, undiscovered, or hidden aspects of the phenomenon one seeks to understand.
    • Methodology of violation An approach to investigating social life that as its point of departure has the study of situations when rules are broken, norms are violated, or crises occur in the normal and smooth functioning or regulated order of everyday life.
    • Microsociology A branch of sociology primarily concerned with different aspects of everyday life such as social interaction, identity, and agency in situational or face-to-face settings and often neglecting or less interested in more conventional macrosociological topics such as social inequality, politics, or structural arrangements.
    • Moral career A process taking place in institutional arrangements that involves the transformation of a person from a normal human being to a less valued human person stripped of his human dignity and civilian rights.
    • Mortification of self A process through which an individual is bereaved of the necessary resources to present himself as a free, self-determined, and competent citizen, resulting in experiences of loss of human dignity and self-respect.
    • Participant observation Method of data collection—at times more broadly subsumed under the headings of ethnography or fieldwork—in which the researcher actively participates in the lives and actions of those studied and often subjects him/herself to the same life conditions of his/her research subjects.
    • Performance The behavior or activities that a person presents in front of an audience. When engaging in performance, actors create impressions of themselves for an audience in order to facilitate interaction and to establish or maintain identity.
    • Region A notion used by Goffman to describe that social interaction takes place within different settings involving different roles and perceptions of audience. The main regions in Goffman's dramaturgy are frontstage, backstage, and outside the stage.
    • Rituals Symbolic acts by which someone or something regarded as sacred is treated with appropriate respect.
    • Role distance A term describing the acts by which a person displays some level of detachment from the role he is presently performing. By practicing role distance, a person acknowledges playing a certain social role but disassociates himself from the specific type of role available in the situation.
    • Self The image of a person that is produced from the impressions and responses in social situations. In Goffman's perspective, the self is thus a product that emerges from the performances of the actor, the actual scene, and the interpretations of the audience.
    • Sign vehicles A notion proposed by Goffman to describe the ways that individuals use the particular setting, their manner, and their appearance to convey information about themselves. These vehicles constitute the major parts of a person's front.
    • Sophisticated irony A term used to describe how irony or a playful ironic stance toward one's research topic, one's readers, or one's own methodology and findings may serve important analytical purposes such as, for example, creating a sense of familiarity with what is described, teasing or seducing the reader, allowing for sarcastic comments, or providing a bulwark against critique.
    • Stigma A social process by which individuals displaying discrediting attributes or behaviors are negatively labeled and sanctioned. Stigma often involves status loss and feelings of shame, anxiety, and embarrassment.
    • Symbolic interactionism An approach to or perspective on sociology, often regarded as microsociological or social psychological, concerned with studying how people through processes of social interaction (such as verbal or nonverbal behavior) with others and definitions of the situation develop, rely on, and derive subjective meaning about others, selves, and society.
    • System requirements Those preconditions or communication-technical demands of interaction (in Goffman's case, primarily verbal interaction or talk) that interaction—as a system of mutual engagement between participants—must abide by if it is to succeed as interaction.
    • Territories (of the self) Goffman's term for the area around an individual, particular objects to which an individual has priority rights, an individual's temporal turn or place, or information about an individual of which the individual is expected to have control. In Goffman's ethological analysis, these territories that can be encroached on by others constitute the self.
    • Total institution A type of institution with an encompassing character and with a blocking of inmates’ contact with the outside world as well as their possibilities of leaving the establishment.

    Bibliography of Goffman's Writings

    Goffman, E. (1949). Some characteristics of response to depicted experience. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago.
    Goffman, E. (1951). Symbols of class status.British Journal of Sociology, 11, 294–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/588083
    Goffman, E. (1952). On cooling the mark out: Some aspects of adaptation to failure.Psychiatry, 15, 451–463.
    Goffman, E. (1953a). The service station dealer: The man and his work.Chicago: Social Research Incorporation.
    Goffman, Goffman. (1953b). Communication conduct in an island community. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Chicago.
    Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231.
    Goffman, E. (1956a). The nature of deference and demeanor.American Anthropologist, 58(3), 473–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00070
    Goffman, E. (1956b). Embarrassment and social organization.American Journal of Sociology, 62, 264–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/222003
    Goffman, E. (1957a). Alienation from interaction.Human Relations, 10, 47–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675701000103
    Goffman, E. (1957b). On some convergences of sociology and psychiatry.Psychiatry, 20(3), 201–203.
    Goffman, E. (1957c). Interpersonal persuasion. In B.Schaffner (Ed.), Group processes.New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, pp. 117–193.
    Goffman, E. (1957d). Some dimensions of the problem. In D. J.Levinson & R. H.Williams (Eds.), The patient and the mental hospital.New York: Free Press, pp. 507–510.
    Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life.New York: Overlook Press.
    Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    Goffman, E. (1963). Behaviour in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings.New York: Free Press.
    Goffman, E. (1964a). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Chicago: Aldine.
    Goffman, E. (1964b). The neglected situation.American Anthropologist, 66(2), special issue: 133–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    Goffman, E. (1966). Communication and enforcement systems. In K.Archibald (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict.Berkeley, CA: Institute for International Studies, pp. 198–220.
    Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour.New York: Anchor Books.
    Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order.New York: Basic Books.
    Goffman, E. (1972). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.New York: Harper & Row.
    Goffman, E. (1976a). Replies and responses.Language and Society, 5(3), 257–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007156
    Goffman, E. (1976b). Gender advertisements: Studies in the anthropology of visual communication.Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 3(2), 69–154.
    Goffman, E. (1977a). The arrangement between the sexes.Theory and Society, 4, 301–331.
    Goffman, E. (1977b). Genderisms: An admittedly malicious look at how advertising reinforces sexual role stereotypes.Psychology Today, 11(3), 60–63.
    Goffman, E. (1977c). La ritualisation de la féminité.Actes de la recherce en sciences sociales, 14, 34–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/arss.1977.2553
    Goffman, E. (1979a). Gender advertisements.London: Macmillan.
    Goffman, E. (1979b). Footing.Semiotica, 25(1–2), 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1
    Goffman, E. (1981a). Forms of talk.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Goffman, E. (1981b). Reply to Denzin and Keller.Contemporary Sociology, 10(1), 60–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2067804
    Goffman, E. (1983a). The interaction order.American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095141
    Goffman, E. (1983b). Felicity's condition.American Journal of Sociology, 89, 1–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095141
    Goffman, E. (1983c). Microsociologie et historie. In P.Fritsch (Ed.), Le Sens de L'ordinaire.Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, pp. 197–202.
    Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(2), 123–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124189018002001

    References

    Abels, H. (1998). Interaktion, identität, präsentation.Wiesbaden: Westdeutsche Verlag.
    Abrahams, R. D. (1984). Pros and players. Raritan, 3(4), 76–94.
    Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1989). The gloried self: The aggrandizement and the constriction of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(4), 299–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786993
    Ainlay, S., Becker, G., & Coleman, L. M. (Eds.). (1986). The dilemma of difference: A multidisciplinary view of stigma.New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7568-5
    Alaszewski, A., & Manthorpe, J. (1995). Goffman, the individual, institutions and stigmatization. Nursing Times, 91, 38–39.
    Albas, D., & Albas, C. (1988). Aces and bombers: The post-exam impression management strategies of students. Symbolic Interaction, 11, 289–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1988.11.2.289
    Album, D. (1995). Hvordan går det med Goffman og Garfinkel? Teorier om samhandling ansikt til ansikt. Sociologisk Tidsskrift, 4, 245–262.
    Album, D. (1996). Nære fremmede: Patientkulturen i sykehus [Close strangers: Patient culture in a Norwegian hospital].Otta: Tano.
    Album, D. (2010). Close strangers: Patient-patient interaction rituals in acute care hospitals. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 352–371. London: Routledge.
    Altheide, D. L. (1997). The news media, the problem frame and the production of fear. Sociological Quarterly, 38(4), 647–668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00758.x
    Anderson, R. J., Hughes, J. A., & Sharrock, W. (1985). Reading sociology: Goffman as example. In R. J.Anderson, J. A.Hughes, & W.Sharrock (Eds.), The Sociology Game.London: Longman.
    Andreski, S. (1972). Social sciences as sorcery.London: Pelican Books.
    Atkinson, P. (1989). Goffman's poetics. Human Studies, 12(1–2), 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00142839
    Attewell, P. (1974). Ethnomethodology since Garfinkel. Theory and Society, 1, 179–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160158
    Baldamus, W. W. (1972). The role of discoveries in social science. In T.Shannin (Ed.), The rules of the game: Cross-disciplinary essays on models in scholarly thought, pp. 276–302. London: Tavistock.
    Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Battershill, C. D. (1990). Erving Goffman as a precursor to post-modern sociology. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 163–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Bauman, Z. (1967). Image of man in the modern sociology–Some methodological remarks. Polish Sociological Bulletin, 7(1), 12–21.
    Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance.New York: Free Press.
    Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on?Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/799147
    Becker, H. S. (2003). The politics of presentation: Goffman and total institutions. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 659–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.659
    Belknap, P. & Leonard, W. M., II. (1991). A conceptual replication and extension of Erving Goffman's study of gender advertisements. Sex Roles, 25(3/4), 103–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289848
    Bell, P., & Milic, M. (2002). Goffman's Gender Advertisements revisited: Combining content analysis with semiotic analysis. Visual Communication, 1(2), 203–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100205
    Berger, B. M. (1973). A fan letter on Erving Goffman. Dissent, 20, 353–361.
    Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    Bergesen, A. (1984). Reflections on Erving Goffman. Quarterly Journal of Sociology, 8, 51–54.
    Berman, M. (1972). Weird but brilliant light on the way we live now: Review of Relations in public. In G. A.Fine & G. W. H.Smith (Eds.), Erving Goffman: A four-volume set, Vol I., pp. 266–277 (Sage Masters in Modern Social Thought Series). London: Sage Publications.
    Birenbaum, A., & Sagarin, E. (Eds.). (1973). People in places: The sociology of the familiar.London: Nelson.
    Birrell, S. (1981). Sport as ritual: Interpretations from Durkheim to Goffman. Social Forces, 60, 354–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/60.2.354
    Birrell, S., & Donnelly, P. (2004). Reclaiming Goffman: Erving Goffman's influence on the sociology of sport. In R.Giulianotti (Ed.), Sport and modern social theorists, pp. 49–64. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave/Macmillan.
    Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method.Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Bock, P. K. (1988). The importance of Erving Goffman to psychological anthropology. Ethos, 16, 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/eth.1988.16.1.02a00010
    Boeskov, B. (1975). Sindsygdom: en social tilbøjelighed. In BoGregersen (Ed.), Om Goffman–11 artikler, pp. 142–157. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
    Bonsu, S. K. (2007). The presentation of dead selves in everyday life: Obituaries and impression management. Symbolic Interaction, 30(2), 199–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2007.30.2.199
    Borey, V. (2004). Tenant-landlord conflict: Goffman's interaction ritual applied. http://Suite101.com: The Genuine Article.
    Bottomore, T., & Nisbet, R. (Eds.) (1978). A history of sociological analysis.New York: Basic Books.
    Bouissac, P. (1990). Incidents, accidents, failures: The representation of negative experience in public entertainment. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 409–442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Boulton, M. (2001). “We pray by his mouth”: Karl Barth, Erving Goffman and a theology of invocation. Modern Theology, 17(1), 67–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0025.00152
    Bourdieu, P. (1983). Erving Goffman: Discoverer of the infinitely small. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(1), 112–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276483002001012
    Bourdieu, P. (1998). Masculine domination.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bovone, L., & Rovati, G. (Eds.). (1992). L'ordine dell'interazione: La sociologia di Erving Goffman.Rome: Armando Editore.
    Branaman, A. (1997). Goffman's social theory. In C.Lemert & A.Branaman (Eds.), The Goffman reader, pp. xvl-lxxxii. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Branaman, A. (2003). Interaction and hierarchy in everyday life. In A. J.Treviño (Ed.), Goffman's legacy.New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Branaman, A. (2010). The protean Goffman: Erving Goffman and the new individualism. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The Contemporary Goffman, pp. 232–255. London: Routledge.
    Branco, D. J. (1983). Dramaturgical rhetoric: Erving Goffman's theory of communication-conduct.Iowa City: University Library Microfilms.
    Brandt, B., & Tatsis, K. (2009). Using Goffman's concepts to explore collaborative interaction processes in elementary school mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 39–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14794800902732217
    Brent, E. E. et al. (1989). Erving: A program to teach sociological reasoning from the dramaturgical perspective. Teaching Sociology, 17(1), 38–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1317923
    Brent, J. (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce: A life.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Brewster, B. H., & Bell, M. M. (2009). The environmental Goffman: Toward an environmental sociology of everyday life. Society & Natural Resources, 23(1), 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802653505
    Brickell, C. (2005). Masculinities, performativity and subversion: A sociological reappraisal. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 24–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03257515
    Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2014). Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences. In P.Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research methods.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Brissett, D., & Edgley, C. (Eds.). (1990). Life as theater (
    2nd ed.
    ). Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
    Brittan, A. (1973). Meanings and situations.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Brown, D. K. (2003). Goffman's dramaturgical sociology: Developing a meaningful theoretical context and exercise involving embarrassment and social organization. Teaching Sociology, 31, 288–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3211326
    Brown, R. H. (1976). Social theory as metaphor: On the logic of discovery for sciences of conduct. Theory and Society, 3, 169–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00161676
    Brown, R. H. (1977). A poetics for sociology: Toward a logic of discovery for the human sciences.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Brown, R. E. (2005). Acting presidential: The dramaturgy of Bush versus Kerry. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(1), 78–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764205279397
    Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity and the rise of sociological research.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Burke, K. (1936/1984). Permanence and change.Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
    Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman.London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203205501
    Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex.London: Routledge.
    Bynum, J., & Pranter, C. (1984). Goffman: content and method for seminal thought. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 12, 95–99.
    Cahill, S., Fine, G. A., & Grant, L. (1995). Dimensions in qualitative research. In K. S.Cook, G. A.Fine, & J. S.House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology, pp. 605–628. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Cappetti, C. (1993). Writing Chicago: Modernism, ethnography and the novel.New York: Columbia University Press.
    Carnevale, F. A. (2007). Revisiting Goffman's Stigma: The social experience of families with children requiring mechanical ventilation at home. Journal of Child Health Care, 11(1), 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367493507073057
    Carter, A. (1979). Female persons. The Guardian, 31 May.
    Caudill, W. (1962). Review of Erving Goffman's Asylums. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 366–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/223363
    Cavan, R. S. (1983). The Chicago school of sociology, 1918–1933. Urban Life, 11, 407–420.
    Chayko, M. (1993). What is real in the age of virtual reality? “Reframing” frame analysis for a technological world. Symbolic Interaction, 16(2), 171–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1993.16.2.171
    Chriss, J. J. (1993). Durkheim's cult of the individual as civil religion: Its appropriation by Erving Goffman. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 251–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1993.9982028
    Chriss, J. J. (1995a). Some thoughts on recent efforts to further systematize Goffman. Sociological Forum, 10(1), 177–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02098570
    Chriss, J. J. (1995b). Habermas, Goffman, and communicative action: Implications for professional practice. American Sociological Review, 60, 545–565. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096294
    Chriss, J. J. (1999). Role distance and the negational self. In G.Smith (Ed.), Goffman and social organization: Studies in a sociological legacy, pp. 64–80. London: Routledge.
    Collett, J. L., & Childs, E. (2009). Meaningful performances: Considering the contributions of the dramaturgical approach to studying family. Sociology Compass, 3–4, 689–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00223.x
    Collins, R. (1981a). The three stages of Goffman. In R.Collins, Sociology since the midcentury: Essays in theory cumulation, pp. 219–253. New York: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-181340-6.50016-X
    Collins, R. (1981b). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227351
    Collins, R. (1985). Three sociological traditions.New York: Oxford University Press.
    Collins, R. (1986). The passing of intellectual generations: Reflections on the death of Erving Goffman. Sociological Theory, 4(1), 106–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202109
    Collins, R. (1988a). Theoretical sociology.San Diego: Harcourt Brace.
    Collins, R. (1988b). Theoretical continuities in Goffman's Work. In P.Drew. & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order, pp. 41–63. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Collins, R. (1990). Stratification, emotional energy and the transient emotions. In T. D.Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions, pp. 27–57. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744
    Collins, R., & Makowsky, M. (1993). The discovery of society.New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Combs, J., & Mansfield, M. (Eds.). (1976). Drama in life.New York: Hastings House.
    Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order.New York: Scribner's.
    Corradi, C. (1990). The metaphoric structure of scientific explanation. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 16(3), 161–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019145379001600301
    Corsaro, W. A. (1983). Review of Erving Goffman's Forms of talk. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 220–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227843
    Coser, L. (1976). Sociological theory from the Chicago dominance to 1965. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 145–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.001045
    Cosgrave, J. F. (2008). Goffman revisited: Action and character in the era of legalized gambling. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 1(1), 80–96.
    Craib, I. (1978). Erving Goffman: Frame analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 8, 79–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839317800800108
    Crossley, N. (1995). Body techniques, agency and intercorporeality: On Goffman's Relations in public. Sociology, 29(1), 133–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029001009
    Czyzewski, M. (1987). Erving Goffman on the individual: A reconstruction. Polish Sociological Bulletin, 17(3), 31–41.
    Dahrendorf, R. (1973). Homo sociologicus.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Damari, C. (2012). From Durkheim to Goffman: Collective consciousness and meta-frame. In A.Salvini, D.Altheide, & C.Nuti (Eds.), The present and future of symbolic interactionism (Vol. II), pp. 39–46. Milan: Franco Angeli/Sociologia.
    David, P. (1980). The reluctant self-presentation of Erving Goffman. The Times Higher Education Supplement, September 19, p. 7.
    Davis, M. S. (1971). That's interesting–Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(4), 309–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211
    Davis, M. S. (1975). Review of Frame analysis. Contemporary Sociology, 4(6), 599–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2064021
    Davis, M. S. (1997). Georg Simmel and Erving Goffman: Legitimators of the sociological investigation of human experience. Qualitative Sociology, 20(3), 369–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024779300122
    Dawe, A. (1973). The underworld-view of Erving Goffman. British Journal of Sociology, 24, 246–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/588382
    Dell, P., & Marinova, D. (2002). Erving Goffman and the Internet. Theory of science (teorie vedy). Journal for Theory of Science, Technology and Communication, 4, 85–98.
    Denzin, N. K. (2002). Much ado about Goffman. American Sociologist, 33(2), 105–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12108-002-1005-3
    Denzin, N. K., & Keller, C. (1981). Frame analysis reconsidered. Contemporary Sociology, 10(1), 52–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2067803
    Dillard, C., Browning, L. D., Sitkin, S. B., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2000). Impression management and the use of procedures at the Ritz-Carlton: Moral standards and dramaturgical discipline. Communication Studies, 51(4), 404–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970009388534
    Ditton, J. (Ed.). (1980). The view from Goffman.London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16268-0
    Donnelly, C. M., & Wright, B. R. E. (2013). Goffman goes to church: Face-saving and the maintenance of collective order in religious ceremonies. Sociological Research Online, 18(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.2869
    Drake, M. S. (2005). Erving Goffman's political sociology and the politics of disabled people's movement in the UK. In B.Haas (Ed.), Macht–Performativität, Performanz und Polittheater seit 1990, pp. 61–73. Würzberg: Königshausen und Neumann.
    Drew, P., & Wootton, A. (Eds.). (1988a). Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Drew, P., & Wootton, A. (1988b). Introduction. In P.Drew & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order, pp. 1–13. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Durkheim, É. (1912/1943). The elementary forms of religious life.New York: Free Press.
    Durkheim, É. (1982). The rules of sociological method.New York: Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9
    Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language.London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9
    Edmondson, R. (1984). Rhetoric in sociology.London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06698-8
    Elias, N. (1939/1994). The civilizing process.Oxford: Blackwell.
    Eliasoph, N. (1990). Political culture and the presentation of a political self: A study of the public sphere in the spirit of Erving Goffman. Theory and Society, 19, 465–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00137622
    Elkind, D. (1975). Encountering Erving Goffman. Human Behavior, 4(3), 25–30.
    Elliot, A. (2001). Concepts of the self.Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
    Erwin, R. (1992). The nature of Goffman. The Centennial Review, 36, 327–342.
    Ewing, D. W. (2002). Disability and feminism: Goffman revisited. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 1(2), 73–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J198v01n02_05
    Farrall, S., & Calverley, A. (2006). Understanding desistance from crime: Theoretical directions in resettlement and rehabilitation.Berkshire, UK. Open University Press.
    Fine, G. A., (1984). Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 239–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.001323
    Fine, G. A., & Manning, P. (2003). Erving Goffman. In G.Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major contemporary social theorists.Oxford: Blackwell.
    Fine, G. A., & Martin, D. D. (1990). Sarcasm, satire, and irony as voices in Erving Goffman's Asylums. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19(1), 89–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124190019001005
    Fine, G. A., & Martin, D. D. (1995). Humour in ethnographic writing: Sarcasm, satire, and irony as voices in Erving Goffman's Asylums. In J.van Maanen (Ed.), Representation in ethnography, pp. 185–197. London: Sage Publications.
    Fine, G. A., & Smith, G. W. H. (Eds.). (2000). Erving Goffman: A four-volume set (Sage Masters in Modern Social Thought Series). London: Sage Publications.
    Fontana, A. (1980). The mask and beyond: The enigmatic sociology of Erving Goffman. In J. D.Douglas (Ed.), Introduction to the sociologies of everyday life, pp. 62–81. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Ford, J. (1975). Paradigms and fairy tales, volume 1–2.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Fosberg, H., & Vagli, Å. (2006). The social construction of emotions in child protection case-talk. Qualitative Social Work, 5(1), 9–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473325006061535
    Foss, D. C. (1972). Self and the revolt against method. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2, 291–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839317200200122
    Foucault, M. (1961/1973). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in an age of reason.New York: Vintage Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203278796
    Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.London: Penguin.
    Franzese, R. J. (2009). The sociology of deviance: Difference, tradition and stigma.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.
    Friedson, E. (1983). Celebrating Erving Goffman. Contemporary Sociology, 12(4), 359–362.
    Frisby, D. (1981). Sociological impressionism: A reassessment of the social theory of Georg Simmel.London: Heinemann.
    Gamson, W. A. (1985). Goffman's legacy to political sociology. Theory and Society, 14(5), 605–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160018
    Gardner, C. B. (1989). Analyzing gender in public places: Rethinking Goffman's vision of everyday life. American Sociologist, 20(1), 42–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02697786
    Gardner, C. B., & Gronfein, W. P. (2005). Reflections on varieties of shame induction, shame management and shame avoidance in some works of Erving Goffman. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 175–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.175
    Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 420–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/221800
    Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism (edited by A. W.Rawls). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
    Gellner, E. (1975). Ethnomethodology: The re-enchanted industry or the Californian way of subjectivity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5(4), 431–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839317500500305
    Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life.New York: Basic Books.
    Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method.London: Hutchinson University Library.
    Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society.Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology.Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Giddens, A. (1988). Goffman as a systematic social theorist. In P.Drew & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order, pp. 260–279. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Giglioli, P. P. (1984). Una lettura durkheimiana di Goffman. Rassegna italiana di sociologia, 3, 401–427.
    Gillespie, J. B. (1980). The phenomenon of the public wife: An exercise in Goffman's impression management. Symbolic Interaction, 3(2), 109–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1980.3.2.109
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1964). Awareness contexts and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 29(5), 669–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2091417
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of dying.Chicago: Aldine.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
    Goffman, E. (1949). Some characteristics of response to depicted experience. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago.
    Goffman, E. (1953a). The service station dealer: The man and his work.Chicago: Social Research Incorporation.
    Goffman, E. (1953b). Communication conduct in an island community. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Chicago.
    Goffman, E. (1956). The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58(3), 473–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00070
    Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life.New York: The Overlook Press.
    Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings.New York: Free Press.
    Goffman, E. (1964). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Chicago: Aldine.
    Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour.New York: Anchor Books.
    Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order.New York: Basic Books.
    Goffman, E. (1972). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.New York: Harper & Row.
    Goffman, E. (1977a). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00206983
    Goffman, E. (1977b). Genderisms: An admittedly malicious look at how advertising reinforces sexual role stereotypes. Psychology Today, 11(3), 60–63.
    Goffman, E. (1977c). La ritualisation de la féminité. Actes de la recherce en sciences sociales, 14, 34–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/arss.1977.2553
    Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements.London: Macmillan.
    Goffman, E. (1981a). Forms of talk.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Goffman, E. (1981b). Reply to Denzin and Keller. Contemporary Sociology, 10(1), 60–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2067804
    Goffman, E. (1983a). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095141
    Goffman, E. (1983b). Felicity's condition. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 1–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227833
    Goffman, E. (1983c). Microsociologie et historie. In P.Fritsch (Ed.), Le Sens de L'ordinaire.Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. pp. 197–202
    Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(2), 123–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124189018002001
    Gonos, G. (1977). “Situation” versus “frame”: The “interactionist” and “structuralist” analyses of everyday life. American Sociological Review, 42, 854–867. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094572
    Gonzales, P. B. (1993). Shame, peer and oscillating frames in DWI conviction: Extending Goffman's sociological landscape. Symbolic Interaction, 16(3), 257–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1993.16.3.257
    Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology.London: Heinemann.
    Gregersen, B. (Ed.). (1975). Om Goffman–11 artikler.Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
    Grimshaw, A. D. (1983). Erving Goffman: A personal appreciation. Language in Society, 12(1), 147–148.
    Gusfield, J. R. (1995). Preface: A second Chicago school? In G. A.Fine (Ed.), A second Chicago school?–The development of a postwar American sociology, pp. ix-xvi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Habermas, J. (1973/1997). Legitimation crisis.Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society.Boston: Beacon Press.
    Hacking, I. (2004). Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society, 33(3), 277–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225671
    Hall, J. A. (1977). Sincerity and politics: “Existentialists” vs. Goffman and Proust. Sociological Review, 25(3), 535–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1977.tb00303.x
    Hancock, J. T., Toma, C., & Ellison, N. (2007). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. CHI 2007 Proceedings, April 28-May 3. Available at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240624.1240697
    Handler, R. (2009). Erving Goffman and the gestural dynamics of modern selfhood. Past & Present, 203(4), 280–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtp013
    Handler, R. (2012). What's up, Doctor Goffman? Tell us where the action is!Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (New Series), 18, 179–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01737.x
    Hannerz, U. (1980). The city as theater: Tales of Goffman. In U.Hannerz, Exploring the city: Inquiries toward an urban anthropology.New York: Columbia University Press.
    Hare, P., & Blumberg, H. (1988). Dramaturgical analysis of social interaction.New York: Praeger.
    Hargreaves, T. (2011). Pro-environmental interaction: Engaging Goffman on pro-environmental behaviour change. CSERGE Working Paper, 2011–04.
    Hartland, N. G. (1994). Goffman's attitude and social analysis. Human Studies, 17, 251–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01323604
    Hatch, J. A. (1987). Impression management in kindergarten classrooms: An analysis of children's face-work in peer interactions. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18(2), 100–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1987.18.2.04x0668r
    Hazelrigg, L. (1992). Reading Goffman's framing as provocation of a discipline. Human Studies, 15, 239–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00182108
    Heath, C. (1988). Embarrassment and interactional organisation. In P.Drew & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order, pp. 136–160. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Heede, D. (1997). Det tomme menneske: Introduktion til Michel Foucault [The empty man: An introduction to the works of Michel Foucault]. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
    Heilman, S. C. (1979). Communication and interaction: A parallel in the theoretical outlooks of Erving Goffman and Ray Birdwhistell. Communication, 4(2), 221–234.
    Henslin, J. M., & Biggs, M. A. (1978). Dramaturgical desexualization: The sociology of vaginal examination. In J. M.Henslin & E.Sagarin (Eds.), The sociology of sex: An introductory reader, pp. 243–272. New York: Schoken Books.
    Hettlage, R., & KarlL. (Eds.). (1991). Erving Goffman: Ein soziologischer Klassiker der zweiten Generation.Bern: Haupt.
    Hillyard, S. (1999). Responding to text construction: Goffman's reflexive imagination. In A.Massey & G.Walford (Eds.), Studies in educational ethnography: Explorations in methodology, volume 2, pp. 57–71. Bingley: Emerald.
    Hinshaw, S. P. (2007). The mark of shame: Stigma of mental illness and agenda for change.New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227049
    Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling.Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Hochschild, A. R. (1990). Gender codes in women's advice books. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 277–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Hollis, M. (1977). Models of man: Philosophical thoughts on social action.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286722
    Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, Jaber F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world.New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hopper, M. (1981). Five key concepts of the dramaturgical perspective. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 9(1), 47–52.
    Hughes, E. C. (1969). Review of Erving Goffman: Interaction ritual. American Journal of Sociology, 75(3), 425–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/224800
    Hymes, D. (1984). On Erving Goffman. Theory and Society, 13, 621–631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160910
    Isaac, J. (Ed.). (1989). Le parler frais d'Erving Goffman.Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
    Isaac, J. (2002). Erving Goffman et al microsociologie (
    2nd ed.
    ). Paris: PUF.
    Jacobsen, M. H. (Ed.). (2008). Encountering the everyday–An introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed.London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
    Jacobsen, M. H. (Ed.). (2010a). The contemporary Goffman.London: Routledge.
    Jacobsen, M. H. (2010b). Recognition as ritualized reciprocation–The interaction order as a realm of recognition. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 199–231. London: Routledge.
    Jacobsen, M. H. (2014). Den metaforiske fantasi–Kreativ rekontekstualisering og rekonstruktion i kvalitativ metode. In J. E.Møller, S.Bengtsen, & K. P.Munk (Eds.), Metodefetichisme–Kvalitativ metode på afveje?Aarhus: Aarhus University Press (forthcoming).
    Jacobsen, M. H., Antoft, R., & Jørgensen, A. (2013). Chicago vice and virtue–The poetic imagination meets the sociological imagination. In M. H.Jacobsen, M. S.Drake, K.Keohane, & A.Petersen (Eds.), Imaginative methodologies in the social sciences–Creativity, poetics and rhetorics in social research, pp. 23–54. Farnham: Ashgate.
    Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2002). Erving Goffman–Sociologien om det elementære livs sociale former.Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
    Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2006). Goffmans metaforer–Om den genbeskrivende og rekontekstualiserende metode hos Erving Goffman. Sosiologi i dag, 36(1), 5–33.
    Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2009). Micro-recognition–Erving Goffman as recognition thinker. Sosiologisk Årbok/Yearbook of Sociology, 14(3–4), 47–76.
    Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2010). Labelling Erving Goffman–The presentation and appropriation of Erving Goffman in sociology. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 64–97. London: Routledge.
    Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2012). Micro-social interaction and everyday life. In G. C.Aakvaag, M. H.Jacobsen, & T.Johansson (Eds.), Introduction to sociology: Scandinavian sensibilities, pp. 238–255. London: Pearson Education.
    James, W. (1950). Principles of psychology, volume 2.New York: Dover.
    Jameson, F. (1976). On Goffman's frame analysis. Theory and Society, 3(1), 119–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00158482
    Jaworski, G. D. (2000). Erving Goffman: The reluctant apprentice. Symbolic Interaction, 23(3), 299–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2000.23.3.299
    Jenkins, R. (2008). Erving Goffman: A major theorist of power?Journal of Power, 2(2), 157–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17540290802227577
    Jenkins, R. (2010). The 21st-century interaction order. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 257–274. London: Routledge.
    Jensen, O. B. (2006). “Facework,” flow and the city: Simmel, Goffman and mobility in the contemporary city. Mobilities, 1(2), 143–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17450100600726506
    Jensen, O. B. (2010). Erving Goffman and everyday life mobility. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 333–351. London: Routledge.
    Johansson, C. (2007). Goffman's sociology: An inspiring source for developing public relations theory. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 275–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.006
    Jørgensen, A., & Smith, D. (2008). The Chicago school of sociology: Survival in the urban jungle. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), Encountering the everyday–An introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed, pp. 45–68. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
    Kalekin-Fishman, D. (1988). Games, rituals and theater: Elements in Goffman's grammar of social action. Sociologia Internationalis, 26(2), 133–146.
    Kang, M. E. (1997). The portrayal of women's images in magazine advertisements: Goffman's gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 979–996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02936350
    Katz, I. (1982). Stigma: A social psychological analysis.New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Kendon, A. (1988). Goffman's approach to face-to-face interaction. In P.Drew & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order, pp. 14–40. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Kim, K. (2002). Order and agency in modernity: Talcott Parsons, Erving Goffman and Harold Garfinkel.New York: State University of New York Press.
    Kjørup, S. (1985). Forskning og samfund [Research and society].Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
    Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology: Towards a reconstruction of social theory and methodology. In K.Knorr-Cetina & A. V.Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macrosociologies, pp. 1–47. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Kristiansen, S. (2000). Kreativ sociologi–Om Erving Goffmans sociologiske teori og metode [Creative sociology–On the sociological method and theory of Erving Goffman]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Social Relations and Organisation, Aalborg University.
    Kristiansen, S. (2002). Det kvalitative continuum: om data og teoriudvikling i kvalitativ sociologi. In M. H.Jacobsen, S.Kristiansen, & A.Prieur (Eds.), Liv, fortælling, tekst–Strejftog i kvalitativ sociologi, pp. 315–340. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
    Kuzmics, H. (1991). Embarrassment and civilization: On some similarities and differences in the work of Goffman and Elias. Theory, Culture & Society, 8, 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327691008002001
    Langman, L. (1992). Alienation and everyday life: Goffman meets Marx at the shopping mall. In F.Geyer & W.Heinz (Eds.), Alienation, society and the individual: Continuity and change in theory and research, pp. 107–124. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
    Lanigan, R. L. (1988). Is Erving Goffman a phenomenologist?Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 335–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295038809366720
    Larsen, J. (2010). Goffman and the tourist gaze: A performative perspective on tourism mobilities. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 313–332. London: Routledge.
    Laursen, E. (1997). Selvet mellem personlighed og rolle [Self between personality and role]. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University.
    Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research.London: Sage Publications.
    Ledger, M. (1982). The observer. Pennsylvania Gazette, February 28, pp. 36–42.
    Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1986). Erving Goffman and the concept of social order. Paper presented at the conference Erving Goffman: An Interdisciplinary Appreciation, University of York, July 8–11.
    Lemert, C. (1997). Goffman. In C.Lemert & A.Branaman (Eds.), The Goffman reader, pp. ix-xliii. New York: Blackwell.
    Lemert, C., & A.Branaman (Eds.). (1997). The Goffman reader.New York: Blackwell.
    Lindgren, G. (1994). Fenomenologi i praktikken. In B.Starrin & P.Svensson (Eds.), Kvalitativ metod och vetenskabsteori, pp. 91–110. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    Ling, R. (2010). The “unboothed” phone: Goffman and the use of mobile communication. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 257–274. London: Routledge.
    Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
    Littlejohn, S. W. (1977). Review essay: Frame analysis and communication. Communication Research, 4, 485–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400406
    Lofland, J. (1984). Erving Goffman's sociological legacies. Urban Life, 13(1), 7–34.
    Lofland, L. H. (1995). Social interaction: Continuities and complexities in the study of nonintimate sociality. In K.Cook, G. A.Fine, & J. S.House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology, pp. 176–201. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Luckmann, T. (1985). On Goffman's last work. Semiotica, 53, 175–178.
    Luhmann, N. (1973/1979). Trust and power.Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
    Luhmann, N. (1984/1995). Social systems.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Lyman, S. M. (1973). Civilization: Contents, discontents, malcontents. Contemporary Sociology, 2, 360–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2062036
    Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1970). A sociology of the absurd.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1975). The drama of social reality.New York: Oxford University Press.
    Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge.Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
    Lysgaard, S. (1976). Arbeiderkollektivet: En studie i de underordnedes sosiologi [The worker collectivity: A sociology of subordinates].Oslo: Oslo University Press.
    MacCannell, D. (1990). The descent of the ego. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution, and social interaction, pp. 19–40. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    MacIntyre, A. (1969). The self as a work of art. New Statesman, March 28, 447–448.
    Mali, J. (2008). Comparison of the characteristics of homes for older people in Slovenia with Goffman's concept of the total institution. European Journal of Social Work, 11(4), 431–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691450802220966
    Manning, P. K. (1976). The decline of civility: A comment on Erving Goffman's sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 13(1), 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1976.tb00755.x
    Manning, P. K. (1980). Goffman's framing order: Style as structure. In J.Ditton (Ed.), The view from Goffman, pp. 252–284. London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16268-0_10
    Manning, P. K. (2008). Goffman on organizations. Organization Studies, 29(5), 677–699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088767
    Manning, P. K., & Hawkins, K. (1990). Legal decisions: A frame analytic perspective. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 203–234. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Manning, P. (1991). Drama as life: The significance of Goffman's changing use of the theatrical metaphor. Sociological Theory, 9(1), 70–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/201874
    Manning, P. (1992). Erving Goffman and modern sociology.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Manning, P. (2005). Reinvigorating the tradition of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 167–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.167
    Markowitz, F. E. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 335–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2676342
    Marx, G. T. (1984). Role models and role distance: A remembrance of Erving Goffman. Theory and Society, 13, 649–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160912
    Marx, G. T. (2004). Some concepts that may be useful in understanding the myriad forms and contexts of surveillance. Intelligence and National Security, 19(2), 226–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268452042000302976
    Mathiesen, T. (1965). The defences of the weak: A sociological study of a Norwegian correctional institution.London: Tavistock.
    Matthews, F. H. (1977). Quest for an American sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago school.Montreal: McGill University Press.
    Matza, D. (1969). Becoming deviant.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    McDonald, G., Higgins, J., & Shuker, M. J. (2008). Addressing the baseline: Erving Goffman and the ethics in a postgraduate degree for practising teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 233–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923377
    McGregor, G. (1986). A view from the fort: Erving Goffman as Canadian. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 23(4), 531–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1986.tb00821.x
    McGregor, G. (1995). Gender advertisements then and now: Goffman, symbolic interactionism and the problem of history. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 17, 3–42.
    McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation: The organization of meaning in social interaction.Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
    Mead, G. H. (1934/1967). Mind, self and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Messinger, S. L., et al. (1962). Life as theater: Notes on the dramaturgic approach to social reality. Sociometry, 25(1), 98–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786040
    Meyrowitz, J. (1990). Redefining the situation: Extending dramaturgy into a theory of social change and media effects. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 65–98. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Millen, N., & Walker, C. (2002). Overcoming the stigma of chronic illness: Strategies for normalisation of a “spoiled identity.”Health Sociology Review, 10, 89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2001.10.2.89
    Miller, H. (1995). The presentation of self in electronic life. Paper presented at a conference on Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space, at Goldsmith's College, June 1995.
    Miller, T. G. (1986). Goffman, positivism and the self. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 16(2), 177–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318601600202
    Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination.New York: Oxford University Press.
    Morris, M. B. (1977). An excursion into creative sociology.Oxford: Blackwell.
    Mortensen, N. (2000). Det moderne individs paradokser [The paradoxes of the modern self]. Distinktion, 1, 91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2000.9672773
    Mullins, N. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology.New York: Harper and Row.
    Münch, R. (1986). The American creed in sociological theory: Exchange, negotiated order, accommodated individualism, and contingency. Sociological Theory, 4: 41–60.
    Musil, R. (1953/1995). The man without qualities, volume I.London: Minerva.
    Nahavandi, F. (1979). Introduction à la sociologie d'Erving Goffman.Brussels: Editions de l'université.
    Neale, J., Nettleton, S., & Pickering, L. (2011). Recovery from problem drug use: What can we learn from the sociologist Erving Goffman?Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 18(1), 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09687631003705546
    Nelson, K. B. (2009). Enhancing the attendee's experience through creative design of the event environment: Applying Goffman's dramaturgical perspective. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 10(2), 120–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15470140902922023
    Neri, G. S. (2002). Goffman oltre Goffman: Ulteriori sviluppi del modelle drammaturgico.Rome: Bibliosofica.
    Nisbet, R. A. (1970). The social bond: An introduction to the study of society.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    Nisbet, R. (1976/2002). Sociology as an art form.New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
    Nizet, J., & Rigaux, N. (2005). La Sociologie de Erving Goffman.Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
    Nunberg, G. (1981). The theatricality of everyday life. New York Times Book Review, May 10.
    O'Mealy, J. H. (2013). Alan Bennett: A critical introduction.London: Routledge.
    O'Neill, J. (1981). A preface to Frame analysis. Human Studies, 4, 359–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02127467
    Oommen, T. K. (1990). Erving Goffman and the study of everyday protest. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 389–408. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Oromaner, M. (1980). Erving Goffman and the academic community. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 10, 287–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318001000304
    Park, G. (1990). Making sense of religion by direct observation: An application of frame analysis. In S. H.Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction, pp. 235–276. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family socialization and interaction processes.New York: Routledge.
    Partington, M., & Cushion, C. J. (2012). Performance during performance: Using Goffman to understand the behaviours of elite youth football coaches during games. Sports Coaching Review, 1(2), 93–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2013.790167
    Paxton, M. (2004). Gone fishin': A framing analysis of the fight over a small town's city seal. Journal of Media and Religion, 3(1), 43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328415jmr0301_3
    Peirce, C. S. (1979). Collected papers.Cambridge, MA: University of Harvard Press.
    Peräkylä, A. (1988). Four frames of death in modern hospital. In A.Gilmore & S.Gilmore (Eds.), A safer death: Multidisciplinary aspects of terminal care, pp. 41–51. New York: Plenum Press.
    Perry, N. (2000). The two cultures of the total institution. In G. A.Fine & G. W. H.Smith (Eds.), Erving Goffman: A four-volume set, Vol. III, pp. 173–183 (Sage Masters in Modern Social Thought Series). London: Sage Publications.
    Persson, A. (2012). Ritualisering och sårbarhety–Ansikte mot ansikte med Goffmans perspektiv på social interaction.Malmö: Liber.
    Petrunik, M. (1980). The rise and fall of “labelling theory”: The construction and destruction of a sociological strawman. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 5(3), 213–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3340175
    Pettit, M. (2011). The con man as model organism: The methodological roots of Erving Goffman's dramaturgical self. History of the Human Sciences, 24(2), 138–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695111398828
    Philips, A. (2010). On Erving Goffman. The Threepenny Review, Fall 2010. Available at http://www.threepennyreview.com/samples/phillips_f10.html
    Phillips, J. (1983). Goffman's linguistic turn: A comment on Forms of talk. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(1), 114–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276483002001013
    Pinch, T. (2010). The invisible technologies of Goffman's sociology: From the merry-go-round to the Internet. Technology and Culture, 51(2), 409–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tech.0.0456
    Platt, J. (1995). Research methods and the second Chicago school. In G. A.Fine (Ed.), A second Chicago school?–The development of a postwar American sociology, pp. 82–107. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Posner, J. (1978). Erving Goffman: His presentation of self. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 8, 67–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839317800800107
    Psathas, G. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on Goffman: Critique and commentary. Sociological Perspectives, 39(3), 383–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1389253
    Puriola, A.-M. (2002). The multiple faces of everyday life: Frame analysis of early childhood practices. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2), 31–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13502930285208941
    Raab, J. (2008). Erving Goffman: Klassiker der Wissenssoziologie.Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
    Rasmussen, S. A. (1975). Stigma [Stima]. In B.Gregersen (Ed.), Om Goffman–11 artikler [On Goffman–11 articles], pp. 92–102. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
    Rawls, A. W. (1984). Interaction as a resource for epistemological critique. Sociological Theory, 2, 222–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/223349
    Rawls, A. W. (1987). The interaction order sui generis: Goffman's contribution to social theory. Theoretical Sociology, 5, 136–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/201935
    Renfrow, D. G. (2004). A cartography of passing in everyday life. Symbolic Interaction, 27(4), 485–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2004.27.4.485
    Rettie, R. M. (2009). Mobile telephone communication: Extending Goffman to mediated interaction. Sociology, 43(3), 421–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038509103197
    Richard, M. P. (1986). Goffman revisited: Relatives vs. administrators in nursing homes. Qualitative Sociology, 9(4), 321–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00988462
    Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
    Riesman, D., Glazer, N., & Denney, R. (1953/2001). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Riggins, S. H. (Ed.). (1990). Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution and social interaction.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110847291
    Rigney, D. (2001). The metaphorical society: An invitation to social theory.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
    Ritsher, J. B., & Phelan, J. C. (2004). Internalized stigma predicts erosion of morale among psychiatric outpatients. Psychiatry Research, 129, 257–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.003
    Ritzer, G. (1992). Sociological theory (
    3rd ed.
    ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social contexts.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E.Rosch & B. B.Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization, pp. 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Rosenfeld, S. (1997). Labeling mental illness: The effects of services and perceived stigma on life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 62, 660–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657432
    Ross, D. A. R. (2007). Backstage with the knowledge boys and girls: Goffman and distributed agency in an organic online community. Organization Studies, 28(3), 307–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076000
    Rutledge, S. E., Abell, N., Padmore, J., & McCann, T. J. (2008). AIDS stigma in health services in the eastern Caribbean. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 17–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01133.x
    Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Sannicolas, N. (1997). Erving Goffman, dramaturgy, and on-line relationships. Available at http://www.members.aol.com/Cybersoc.
    Sarbin, T. R. (2003). The dramaturgical approach to social psychology: The influence of Erving Goffman. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), The anatomy of impact–What makes the great works of social psychology great, pp. 125–136. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10563-007
    Sarmicanic, L. (2004). Goffman, pets and people: An analysis of humans and their companion animals. ReVision, 27(2), 42–47.
    Scambler, G. (2006). Jigsaws, models and the sociology of stigma. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(2), 273–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jocr.v5i2.273
    Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology: Discourse, emotion and social structure.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Scheff, T. J. (2003). The Goffman legacy–Deconstructing/reconstructing social science. In A. J.Treviño (Ed.), Goffman's legacy, pp. 50–70. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Scheff, T. J. (2005). Looking-glass self: Goffman as symbolic interactionist. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 147–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.147
    Scheff, T. J. (2006). Goffman unbound!–A new paradigm for social science.Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
    Scheff, T. J. (2010). A new Goffman: Robert W. Fuller's politics of dignity. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 185–198. London: Routledge.
    Scheibe, K. E. (2002). The drama of everyday life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Schimmelfennig, F. (2002). Goffman meets IR: Dramaturgical action in international community. International Review of Sociology, 12(3), 417–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0390670022000041411
    Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2102818
    Schutz, A. (1970). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In D.Emmet & A.MacIntyre (Eds.), Sociological theory and philosophical analysis, pp. 1–19. New York: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15388-6_1
    Schwalbe, M. L. (1993). Goffman against postmodernism: Emotion and the reality of the self. Symbolic Interaction, 16(4), 333–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1993.16.4.333
    Schwartz, H., & Jacobs, J. (1979). Qualitative methods: A method to the madness.New York: Free Press.
    Shalin, D. N. (2010). Erving Goffman's self-ethnographies: Interfacing biography, theory and history. Available at http://doingmodernity.blogspot.dk/2012/04/goffmans-self-ethnographies-by-dmitri.html
    Sharrock, W. (1999). The omnipotence of the actor: Erving Goffman and “the definition of the situation.” In G.Smith (Ed.), Goffman and social organization: Studies in a sociological legacy, pp. 119–137. London: Routledge.
    Sharron, A. (2000). Frame paralysis: When time stands still. In G. A.Fine & G. W. H.Smith (Eds.), Erving Goffman: A four-volume set, Vol. III, pp. 212–238 (Sage Masters in Modern Social Thought Series). London: Sage Publications.
    Sijuwade, P. O. (1995). Counterfeit intimacy: A dramaturgical analysis of an erotic performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 23(4), 369–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.369
    Simmel, G. (1909). The problem of sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 15(3), 289–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/211783
    Simmel, G. (1971). The problem of sociology. In Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (selected writings edited and translated by D. N.Levine), pp. 23–35. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924694.001.0001
    Simmel, G. (1992). Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesell-schaftung (Gesamtausgab, Vol. II). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    Simmel, G. (1998). Hvordan er samfundet muligt? [How is society possible?]Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
    Smith, G. (1988). The sociology of Erving Goffman. Social Studies Review, 3, 118–122.
    Smith, G. (Ed.). (1999a). Goffman and social organization: Studies of a sociological legacy.London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203296875
    Smith, G. (1999b). Introduction: Interpreting Goffman's sociological legacy. In G.Smith (Ed.), Goffman and social organization: Studies in a sociological legacy, pp. 1–18. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203296875
    Smith, G. (2003). Chrysalid Goffman: A note on “Some Characteristics of Response to Depicted Experience.”Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 645–658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.645
    Smith, G. (2006). Erving Goffman.London: Taylor and Francis. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203002346
    Smith, G. (2010). Reconsidering Gender advertisements: Performativity, framing and display. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 165–184. London: Routledge.
    Smith, G., & Jacobsen, M. H. (2010). Goffman's textuality–Literary sensibilities and sociological rhetorics. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 119–146. London: Routledge.
    Snell, P. (2010). From Durkheim to the Chicago school: Against the “variables sociology” paradigm. Journal of Classical Sociology, 10(1), 51–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468795X09352557
    Stein, M. (1991). Sociology and the prosaic. Sociological Inquiry, 61(4), 421–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1991.tb00171.x
    Strong, P. M. (1983). The importance of being Erving. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5(3), 345–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10491854
    Stubbs, M. (1983). Dimensions of sociolinguistics. Language in Society, 12, 77–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009623
    Summers-Effler, E. (2007). Ritual theory. In J. E.Stets & J. H.Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions, pp. 135–154. New York: Springer.
    Sylvest, N. (1975). Interaktionsregler. In B.Gregersen (Ed.), Om Goffman–11 artikler, pp. 123–141. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
    Tannen, D. (1979). What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. O.Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing, pp. 14–56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Thomas, W. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl.Boston: Little, Brown.
    Time Magazine. (1969). Exploring a shadow world. Time Magazine, January 10, 50–51.
    Tiryakian, E. A. (1962). Sociologism and existentialism–Two perspectives on the individual and society.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Treviño, A. J., (Ed.). (2003a). Goffman's legacy.New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Treviño, A. J., (2003b). Erving Goffman and the interaction order. In A. J.Treviño (Ed.), Goffman's legacy, pp. 1–49. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Tseëlon, E. (1992a). Is the presented self sincere?Theory, Culture & Society, 9(2), 115–128.
    Tseëlon, E. (1992b). Self presentation through appearance: A manipulative vs. a dramaturgical approach. Symbolic Interaction, 15(4), 501–513.
    Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Turner, R. E., & Edgley, C. (1976). Death as theater: A dramaturgical analysis of the American funeral. Sociology and Social Research, 60(4), 377–392.
    Turner, R. (2010). Remembering Erving Goffman. Available at http://cdclv.unlv.edu/archives/interactionism/goffman/turner_roy_10.html
    van Krieken, R. (1998). Norbert Elias.London: Routledge.
    Verhoeven, J. C. (1993). An Interview with Erving Goffman, 1980. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 317–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_5
    Waksler, F. C. (1989). Erving Goffman's sociology: An introductory essay. Human Studies, 12, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00142837
    Waksler, F., & Psathas, G. (1989). Selected books and articles about Erving Goffman and of related interest. Human Studies, 12, 177–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00142837
    Wallace, R. A., & Wolf, A. (1999). Contemporary sociological theory: Expanding the classical tradition.Englewood-Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
    Wanenchak, S. (2010). Tags, threads and frames: Toward a synthesis of interaction ritual and Livejournal roleplaying. Game Studies, 10(1). Available at http://gamestudies.org/1001/articles/wanenchak.
    Watson, R. (1983). Goffman, talk and interaction: Some modulated responses. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(1), 103–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276483002001010
    Weber, M. (1972). Georg Simmel as sociologist. Social Research, 39, 155–163.
    Wedel, J. M. (1978). Ladies, we've been framed! Observations on Erving Goffman's The arrangement between the sexes. Theory & Society, 5(1), 113–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01880863
    Weigert, A. J. (1981). Sociology of everyday life.London: Longman.
    Weigert, A. J. (2003). Terrorism, identity and public order: A perspective from Goffman. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3(2), 93–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XID030201
    West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 121–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
    Wexler, M. N. (1984). The enigma of Goffman's sociology. Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 8, 40–50.
    White, R., & Hanson, D. (2002). Corporate self, corporate reputation and corporate annual reports: Re-enrolling Goffman. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18, 285–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221%2801%2900013-6
    Wiley, N. (1979). The rise and fall of dominating theories in American sociology. In W.Snizek et al. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in theory and research, pp. 49–79. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
    Williams, P., & Weninger, C. (2012). Applying Goffman's assumptions to a new media environment. In A.Salvini, D.Altheide, & C.Nuti (Eds.), The present and future of symbolic interactionism (volume II), pp. 47–60. Milan: Franco Angeli/Sociologia.
    Williams, R. (1983). Sociological tropes: A tribute to Erving Goffman. Theory, Culture & Society, 2, 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276483002001009
    Williams, R. (1988). Understanding Goffman's methods. In P.Drew & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman–Exploring the interaction order, pp. 64–88. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Williams, R. (1998). Erving Goffman. In R.Stones (Ed.), Key sociological thinkers.New York: New York University Press.
    Williams, S. J. (2000). Goffman, interactionism, and the management of stigma in everyday life. In G. A.Fine & G. W. H.Smith (Eds.), Erving Goffman: A four-volume set (Sage Masters in Modern Social Thought Series). London: Sage Publications.
    Winkin, Y. (1983). The French (re)presentation of Goffman's presentation and other books. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(1), 109–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276483002001011
    Winkin, Y. (1988). Erving Goffman: Les moments et leurs hommes.Paris: Seuil.
    Winkin, Y. (1999). Erving Goffman: What a life?–The uneasy making of an intellectual biography. In G.Smith (Ed.), Goffman and social organization: Studies in a sociological legacy, pp. 19–41. London: Routledge.
    Winkin, Y. (2000). Baltasound as the symbolic capital of social interaction. In G. A.Fine & G. W. H.Smith (Eds.), Erving Goffman: A four-volume set (Sage Masters in Modern Social Thought Series), Vol. I, pp. 193–212. London: Sage Publications.
    Winkin, Y. (2010). Goffman's greenings. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 51–63. London: Routledge.
    Winkin, Y., & Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2013). Erving Goffman–A critical introduction to media and communication theory.New York: Peter Lang.
    Young, T. R. (1971). The politics of sociology: Gouldner, Goffman and Garfinkel. American Sociologist, 6(4), 276–281.
    Ytreberg, E. (2002). Erving Goffman as the theorist of mass media. Critical Studies in Media Studies, 19(4), 481–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216570
    Ytreberg, E. (2010). The question of calculation: Erving Goffman and the pervasive planning of communication. In M. H.Jacobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman, pp. 293–312. London: Routledge.
    Zeitlin, I. M. (1973). The social psychology of Erving Goffman. In I. M.Zeitlin, Rethinking sociology: A critique of contemporary theory, pp. 191–214. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    Zussman, R. (2001). Review: Still lonely after all these years. Sociological Forum, 16(1), 157–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007617504879
    Ølgaard, B. (1975). Når mennesker mødes [Human encounters]. In B.Gregersen (Ed.), Om Goffman–11 artikler [On Goffman–11 Articles], pp. 42–65. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
    Østerberg, D. (1993). Fortolkende sociologi, volume 1: Almene emner ogmetodologi.Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    About the Authors

    Michael Hviid Jacobsen (born 1971) is a professor of sociology at Aalborg University, Denmark. He has published many titles as author or editor, including The Transformation of Modernity (Ashgate, 2001), Erving Goffman (Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2002), The Sociology of Zygmunt Bauman (Ashgate 2008), Public Sociology (Aalborg University Press, 2009), Encountering the Everyday (Palgrave/Macmillan, 2009), The Contemporary Goffman (Routledge, 2010), Utopia: Social Theory and the Future (Ashgate, 2013), Imaginative Methodologies in the Social Sciences (Ashgate, 2013), Deconstructing Death (University Press of Southern Denmark, 2013), and The Poetics of Crime (Ashgate, 2014).

    Søren Kristiansen (born 1971) is a professor of sociology at Aalborg University, Denmark. He has, as author or editor, published several titles on the work of Erving Goffman, including Kreativ sociologi (Aalborg University, 2000), Erving Goffman (Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2002), and Mikrosociologi og social samhandling (Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2004) and numerous articles in Danish and international journals. In recent years, he has turned his attention toward the sociology of gambling.


    • Loading...
Back to Top